_multiplyComplex, imaginary part

Percentage Accurate: 99.1% → 99.7%

Time: 1.9s

Alternatives: 5

Speedup: 1.0×

• 23.4% of points produce a very large (infinite) output. You may want to add a precondition.

Specification

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x.re \cdot y.im + x.im \cdot y.re \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x.re x.im y.re y.im)
 :precision binary64
 (+ (* x.re y.im) (* x.im y.re)))

C

double code(double x_46_re, double x_46_im, double y_46_re, double y_46_im) {
	return (x_46_re * y_46_im) + (x_46_im * y_46_re);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x_46re, x_46im, y_46re, y_46im)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x_46re
    real(8), intent (in) :: x_46im
    real(8), intent (in) :: y_46re
    real(8), intent (in) :: y_46im
    code = (x_46re * y_46im) + (x_46im * y_46re)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x_46_re, double x_46_im, double y_46_re, double y_46_im) {
	return (x_46_re * y_46_im) + (x_46_im * y_46_re);
}

Python

def code(x_46_re, x_46_im, y_46_re, y_46_im):
	return (x_46_re * y_46_im) + (x_46_im * y_46_re)

Julia

function code(x_46_re, x_46_im, y_46_re, y_46_im)
	return Float64(Float64(x_46_re * y_46_im) + Float64(x_46_im * y_46_re))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x_46_re, x_46_im, y_46_re, y_46_im)
	tmp = (x_46_re * y_46_im) + (x_46_im * y_46_re);
end

Wolfram

code[x$46$re_, x$46$im_, y$46$re_, y$46$im_] := N[(N[(x$46$re * y$46$im), $MachinePrecision] + N[(x$46$im * y$46$re), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Initial Program: 99.1% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x.re \cdot y.im + x.im \cdot y.re \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x.re x.im y.re y.im)
 :precision binary64
 (+ (* x.re y.im) (* x.im y.re)))

C

double code(double x_46_re, double x_46_im, double y_46_re, double y_46_im) {
	return (x_46_re * y_46_im) + (x_46_im * y_46_re);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x_46re, x_46im, y_46re, y_46im)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x_46re
    real(8), intent (in) :: x_46im
    real(8), intent (in) :: y_46re
    real(8), intent (in) :: y_46im
    code = (x_46re * y_46im) + (x_46im * y_46re)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x_46_re, double x_46_im, double y_46_re, double y_46_im) {
	return (x_46_re * y_46_im) + (x_46_im * y_46_re);
}

Python

def code(x_46_re, x_46_im, y_46_re, y_46_im):
	return (x_46_re * y_46_im) + (x_46_im * y_46_re)

Julia

function code(x_46_re, x_46_im, y_46_re, y_46_im)
	return Float64(Float64(x_46_re * y_46_im) + Float64(x_46_im * y_46_re))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x_46_re, x_46_im, y_46_re, y_46_im)
	tmp = (x_46_re * y_46_im) + (x_46_im * y_46_re);
end

Wolfram

code[x$46$re_, x$46$im_, y$46$re_, y$46$im_] := N[(N[(x$46$re * y$46$im), $MachinePrecision] + N[(x$46$im * y$46$re), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Alternative 1: 99.7% accurate, 0.1× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \mathsf{fma}\left(y.re, x.im, x.re \cdot y.im\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x.re x.im y.re y.im)
 :precision binary64
 (fma y.re x.im (* x.re y.im)))

C

double code(double x_46_re, double x_46_im, double y_46_re, double y_46_im) {
	return fma(y_46_re, x_46_im, (x_46_re * y_46_im));
}

Julia

function code(x_46_re, x_46_im, y_46_re, y_46_im)
	return fma(y_46_re, x_46_im, Float64(x_46_re * y_46_im))
end

Wolfram

code[x$46$re_, x$46$im_, y$46$re_, y$46$im_] := N[(y$46$re * x$46$im + N[(x$46$re * y$46$im), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 98.8%

   \[x.re \cdot y.im + x.im \cdot y.re \]

2. Taylor expanded in x.re around 0 98.8%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x.re \cdot y.im + y.re \cdot x.im} \]
3. Step-by-step derivation

   1. +-commutative 98.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y.re \cdot x.im + x.re \cdot y.im} \]

   2. fma-def 99.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y.re, x.im, x.re \cdot y.im\right)} \]

4. Simplified 99.6%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y.re, x.im, x.re \cdot y.im\right)} \]

5. Final simplification 99.6%

   \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y.re, x.im, x.re \cdot y.im\right) \]

Alternative 2: 99.4% accurate, 0.1× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \mathsf{fma}\left(x.re, y.im, y.re \cdot x.im\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x.re x.im y.re y.im)
 :precision binary64
 (fma x.re y.im (* y.re x.im)))

C

double code(double x_46_re, double x_46_im, double y_46_re, double y_46_im) {
	return fma(x_46_re, y_46_im, (y_46_re * x_46_im));
}

Julia

function code(x_46_re, x_46_im, y_46_re, y_46_im)
	return fma(x_46_re, y_46_im, Float64(y_46_re * x_46_im))
end

Wolfram

code[x$46$re_, x$46$im_, y$46$re_, y$46$im_] := N[(x$46$re * y$46$im + N[(y$46$re * x$46$im), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 98.8%

   \[x.re \cdot y.im + x.im \cdot y.re \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. fma-def 99.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x.re, y.im, x.im \cdot y.re\right)} \]

3. Simplified 99.2%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x.re, y.im, x.im \cdot y.re\right)} \]

4. Final simplification 99.2%

   \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x.re, y.im, y.re \cdot x.im\right) \]

Alternative 3: 67.7% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x.im \leq -1.05 \cdot 10^{+71}:\\ \;\;\;\;y.re \cdot x.im\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x.im \leq 7.5 \cdot 10^{-126}:\\ \;\;\;\;x.re \cdot y.im\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;y.re \cdot x.im\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x.re x.im y.re y.im)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= x.im -1.05e+71)
   (* y.re x.im)
   (if (<= x.im 7.5e-126) (* x.re y.im) (* y.re x.im))))

C

double code(double x_46_re, double x_46_im, double y_46_re, double y_46_im) {
	double tmp;
	if (x_46_im <= -1.05e+71) {
		tmp = y_46_re * x_46_im;
	} else if (x_46_im <= 7.5e-126) {
		tmp = x_46_re * y_46_im;
	} else {
		tmp = y_46_re * x_46_im;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x_46re, x_46im, y_46re, y_46im)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x_46re
    real(8), intent (in) :: x_46im
    real(8), intent (in) :: y_46re
    real(8), intent (in) :: y_46im
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (x_46im <= (-1.05d+71)) then
        tmp = y_46re * x_46im
    else if (x_46im <= 7.5d-126) then
        tmp = x_46re * y_46im
    else
        tmp = y_46re * x_46im
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x_46_re, double x_46_im, double y_46_re, double y_46_im) {
	double tmp;
	if (x_46_im <= -1.05e+71) {
		tmp = y_46_re * x_46_im;
	} else if (x_46_im <= 7.5e-126) {
		tmp = x_46_re * y_46_im;
	} else {
		tmp = y_46_re * x_46_im;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x_46_re, x_46_im, y_46_re, y_46_im):
	tmp = 0
	if x_46_im <= -1.05e+71:
		tmp = y_46_re * x_46_im
	elif x_46_im <= 7.5e-126:
		tmp = x_46_re * y_46_im
	else:
		tmp = y_46_re * x_46_im
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x_46_re, x_46_im, y_46_re, y_46_im)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (x_46_im <= -1.05e+71)
		tmp = Float64(y_46_re * x_46_im);
	elseif (x_46_im <= 7.5e-126)
		tmp = Float64(x_46_re * y_46_im);
	else
		tmp = Float64(y_46_re * x_46_im);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x_46_re, x_46_im, y_46_re, y_46_im)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (x_46_im <= -1.05e+71)
		tmp = y_46_re * x_46_im;
	elseif (x_46_im <= 7.5e-126)
		tmp = x_46_re * y_46_im;
	else
		tmp = y_46_re * x_46_im;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x$46$re_, x$46$im_, y$46$re_, y$46$im_] := If[LessEqual[x$46$im, -1.05e+71], N[(y$46$re * x$46$im), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[x$46$im, 7.5e-126], N[(x$46$re * y$46$im), $MachinePrecision], N[(y$46$re * x$46$im), $MachinePrecision]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if x.im < -1.04999999999999995e71 or 7.49999999999999976e-126 < x.im

   1. Initial program 97.7%

      \[x.re \cdot y.im + x.im \cdot y.re \]

   2. Taylor expanded in x.re around 0 70.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y.re \cdot x.im} \]

   if -1.04999999999999995e71 < x.im < 7.49999999999999976e-126

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[x.re \cdot y.im + x.im \cdot y.re \]

   2. Taylor expanded in x.re around inf 68.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x.re \cdot y.im} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 69.4%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x.im \leq -1.05 \cdot 10^{+71}:\\ \;\;\;\;y.re \cdot x.im\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x.im \leq 7.5 \cdot 10^{-126}:\\ \;\;\;\;x.re \cdot y.im\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;y.re \cdot x.im\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 4: 99.1% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x.re \cdot y.im + y.re \cdot x.im \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x.re x.im y.re y.im)
 :precision binary64
 (+ (* x.re y.im) (* y.re x.im)))

C

double code(double x_46_re, double x_46_im, double y_46_re, double y_46_im) {
	return (x_46_re * y_46_im) + (y_46_re * x_46_im);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x_46re, x_46im, y_46re, y_46im)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x_46re
    real(8), intent (in) :: x_46im
    real(8), intent (in) :: y_46re
    real(8), intent (in) :: y_46im
    code = (x_46re * y_46im) + (y_46re * x_46im)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x_46_re, double x_46_im, double y_46_re, double y_46_im) {
	return (x_46_re * y_46_im) + (y_46_re * x_46_im);
}

Python

def code(x_46_re, x_46_im, y_46_re, y_46_im):
	return (x_46_re * y_46_im) + (y_46_re * x_46_im)

Julia

function code(x_46_re, x_46_im, y_46_re, y_46_im)
	return Float64(Float64(x_46_re * y_46_im) + Float64(y_46_re * x_46_im))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x_46_re, x_46_im, y_46_re, y_46_im)
	tmp = (x_46_re * y_46_im) + (y_46_re * x_46_im);
end

Wolfram

code[x$46$re_, x$46$im_, y$46$re_, y$46$im_] := N[(N[(x$46$re * y$46$im), $MachinePrecision] + N[(y$46$re * x$46$im), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 98.8%

   \[x.re \cdot y.im + x.im \cdot y.re \]

2. Final simplification 98.8%

   \[\leadsto x.re \cdot y.im + y.re \cdot x.im \]

Alternative 5: 52.4% accurate, 2.3× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x.re \cdot y.im \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x.re x.im y.re y.im) :precision binary64 (* x.re y.im))

C

double code(double x_46_re, double x_46_im, double y_46_re, double y_46_im) {
	return x_46_re * y_46_im;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x_46re, x_46im, y_46re, y_46im)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x_46re
    real(8), intent (in) :: x_46im
    real(8), intent (in) :: y_46re
    real(8), intent (in) :: y_46im
    code = x_46re * y_46im
end function

Java

public static double code(double x_46_re, double x_46_im, double y_46_re, double y_46_im) {
	return x_46_re * y_46_im;
}

Python

def code(x_46_re, x_46_im, y_46_re, y_46_im):
	return x_46_re * y_46_im

Julia

function code(x_46_re, x_46_im, y_46_re, y_46_im)
	return Float64(x_46_re * y_46_im)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x_46_re, x_46_im, y_46_re, y_46_im)
	tmp = x_46_re * y_46_im;
end

Wolfram

code[x$46$re_, x$46$im_, y$46$re_, y$46$im_] := N[(x$46$re * y$46$im), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 98.8%

   \[x.re \cdot y.im + x.im \cdot y.re \]

2. Taylor expanded in x.re around inf 49.9%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x.re \cdot y.im} \]

3. Final simplification 49.9%

   \[\leadsto x.re \cdot y.im \]

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2023200 
(FPCore (x.re x.im y.re y.im)
  :name "_multiplyComplex, imaginary part"
  :precision binary64
  (+ (* x.re y.im) (* x.im y.re)))