forward-v

Percentage Accurate: 30.5% → 99.7%
Time: 1.9min
Alternatives: 8
Speedup: 4.4×

Specification

?
\[0.5 \cdot \left(ArB \cdot \log \left(\frac{1 - U}{1 + U}\right)\right) \]
(FPCore (U ArB)
  :precision binary64
  :pre TRUE
  (* 0.5 (* ArB (log (/ (- 1.0 U) (+ 1.0 U))))))
double code(double U, double ArB) {
	return 0.5 * (ArB * log(((1.0 - U) / (1.0 + U))));
}
real(8) function code(u, arb)
use fmin_fmax_functions
    real(8), intent (in) :: u
    real(8), intent (in) :: arb
    code = 0.5d0 * (arb * log(((1.0d0 - u) / (1.0d0 + u))))
end function
public static double code(double U, double ArB) {
	return 0.5 * (ArB * Math.log(((1.0 - U) / (1.0 + U))));
}
def code(U, ArB):
	return 0.5 * (ArB * math.log(((1.0 - U) / (1.0 + U))))
function code(U, ArB)
	return Float64(0.5 * Float64(ArB * log(Float64(Float64(1.0 - U) / Float64(1.0 + U)))))
end
function tmp = code(U, ArB)
	tmp = 0.5 * (ArB * log(((1.0 - U) / (1.0 + U))));
end
code[U_, ArB_] := N[(0.5 * N[(ArB * N[Log[N[(N[(1.0 - U), $MachinePrecision] / N[(1.0 + U), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]
f(U, ArB):
	U in [-inf, +inf],
	ArB in [-inf, +inf]
code: THEORY
BEGIN
f(U, ArB: real): real =
	(5e-1) * (ArB * (ln((((1) - U) / ((1) + U)))))
END code
0.5 \cdot \left(ArB \cdot \log \left(\frac{1 - U}{1 + U}\right)\right)

Local Percentage Accuracy vs ?

The average percentage accuracy by input value. Horizontal axis shows value of an input variable; the variable is choosen in the title. Vertical axis is accuracy; higher is better. Red represent the original program, while blue represents Herbie's suggestion. These can be toggled with buttons below the plot. The line is an average while dots represent individual samples.

Accuracy vs Speed?

Herbie found 8 alternatives:

AlternativeAccuracySpeedup
The accuracy (vertical axis) and speed (horizontal axis) of each alternatives. Up and to the right is better. The red square shows the initial program, and each blue circle shows an alternative.The line shows the best available speed-accuracy tradeoffs.

Initial Program: 30.5% accurate, 1.0× speedup?

\[0.5 \cdot \left(ArB \cdot \log \left(\frac{1 - U}{1 + U}\right)\right) \]
(FPCore (U ArB)
  :precision binary64
  :pre TRUE
  (* 0.5 (* ArB (log (/ (- 1.0 U) (+ 1.0 U))))))
double code(double U, double ArB) {
	return 0.5 * (ArB * log(((1.0 - U) / (1.0 + U))));
}
real(8) function code(u, arb)
use fmin_fmax_functions
    real(8), intent (in) :: u
    real(8), intent (in) :: arb
    code = 0.5d0 * (arb * log(((1.0d0 - u) / (1.0d0 + u))))
end function
public static double code(double U, double ArB) {
	return 0.5 * (ArB * Math.log(((1.0 - U) / (1.0 + U))));
}
def code(U, ArB):
	return 0.5 * (ArB * math.log(((1.0 - U) / (1.0 + U))))
function code(U, ArB)
	return Float64(0.5 * Float64(ArB * log(Float64(Float64(1.0 - U) / Float64(1.0 + U)))))
end
function tmp = code(U, ArB)
	tmp = 0.5 * (ArB * log(((1.0 - U) / (1.0 + U))));
end
code[U_, ArB_] := N[(0.5 * N[(ArB * N[Log[N[(N[(1.0 - U), $MachinePrecision] / N[(1.0 + U), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]
f(U, ArB):
	U in [-inf, +inf],
	ArB in [-inf, +inf]
code: THEORY
BEGIN
f(U, ArB: real): real =
	(5e-1) * (ArB * (ln((((1) - U) / ((1) + U)))))
END code
0.5 \cdot \left(ArB \cdot \log \left(\frac{1 - U}{1 + U}\right)\right)

Alternative 1: 99.7% accurate, 0.7× speedup?

\[\left(\left(U \cdot U\right) \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(-0.14285714285714285, U \cdot U, -0.2\right), U \cdot U, -0.3333333333333333\right) \cdot ArB\right) - ArB\right) \cdot U \]
(FPCore (U ArB)
  :precision binary64
  :pre TRUE
  (*
 (-
  (*
   (* U U)
   (*
    (fma
     (fma -0.14285714285714285 (* U U) -0.2)
     (* U U)
     -0.3333333333333333)
    ArB))
  ArB)
 U))
double code(double U, double ArB) {
	return (((U * U) * (fma(fma(-0.14285714285714285, (U * U), -0.2), (U * U), -0.3333333333333333) * ArB)) - ArB) * U;
}
function code(U, ArB)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(U * U) * Float64(fma(fma(-0.14285714285714285, Float64(U * U), -0.2), Float64(U * U), -0.3333333333333333) * ArB)) - ArB) * U)
end
code[U_, ArB_] := N[(N[(N[(N[(U * U), $MachinePrecision] * N[(N[(N[(-0.14285714285714285 * N[(U * U), $MachinePrecision] + -0.2), $MachinePrecision] * N[(U * U), $MachinePrecision] + -0.3333333333333333), $MachinePrecision] * ArB), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - ArB), $MachinePrecision] * U), $MachinePrecision]
f(U, ArB):
	U in [-inf, +inf],
	ArB in [-inf, +inf]
code: THEORY
BEGIN
f(U, ArB: real): real =
	(((U * U) * ((((((-142857142857142849212692681248881854116916656494140625e-54) * (U * U)) + (-200000000000000011102230246251565404236316680908203125e-54)) * (U * U)) + (-333333333333333314829616256247390992939472198486328125e-54)) * ArB)) - ArB) * U
END code
\left(\left(U \cdot U\right) \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(-0.14285714285714285, U \cdot U, -0.2\right), U \cdot U, -0.3333333333333333\right) \cdot ArB\right) - ArB\right) \cdot U
Derivation
  1. Initial program 30.5%

    \[0.5 \cdot \left(ArB \cdot \log \left(\frac{1 - U}{1 + U}\right)\right) \]
  2. Taylor expanded in U around 0

    \[\leadsto U \cdot \left(-1 \cdot ArB + {U}^{2} \cdot \left(\frac{-1}{3} \cdot ArB + {U}^{2} \cdot \left(\frac{-1}{5} \cdot ArB + \frac{-1}{7} \cdot \left(ArB \cdot {U}^{2}\right)\right)\right)\right) \]
  3. Applied rewrites99.7%

    \[\leadsto U \cdot \mathsf{fma}\left(-1, ArB, {U}^{2} \cdot \mathsf{fma}\left(-0.3333333333333333, ArB, {U}^{2} \cdot \mathsf{fma}\left(-0.2, ArB, -0.14285714285714285 \cdot \left(ArB \cdot {U}^{2}\right)\right)\right)\right) \]
  4. Applied rewrites99.7%

    \[\leadsto U \cdot \left(\left(U \cdot U\right) \cdot \mathsf{fma}\left(ArB \cdot \left(U \cdot U\right), \mathsf{fma}\left(-0.14285714285714285, U \cdot U, -0.2\right), -0.3333333333333333 \cdot ArB\right) - ArB\right) \]
  5. Applied rewrites99.7%

    \[\leadsto \left(\left(U \cdot U\right) \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(-0.14285714285714285, U \cdot U, -0.2\right), U \cdot U, -0.3333333333333333\right) \cdot ArB\right) - ArB\right) \cdot U \]
  6. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 2: 99.7% accurate, 0.7× speedup?

\[\left(ArB \cdot \mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(-0.14285714285714285, U \cdot U, -0.2\right), U \cdot U, -0.3333333333333333\right), U \cdot U, -1\right)\right) \cdot U \]
(FPCore (U ArB)
  :precision binary64
  :pre TRUE
  (*
 (*
  ArB
  (fma
   (fma
    (fma -0.14285714285714285 (* U U) -0.2)
    (* U U)
    -0.3333333333333333)
   (* U U)
   -1.0))
 U))
double code(double U, double ArB) {
	return (ArB * fma(fma(fma(-0.14285714285714285, (U * U), -0.2), (U * U), -0.3333333333333333), (U * U), -1.0)) * U;
}
function code(U, ArB)
	return Float64(Float64(ArB * fma(fma(fma(-0.14285714285714285, Float64(U * U), -0.2), Float64(U * U), -0.3333333333333333), Float64(U * U), -1.0)) * U)
end
code[U_, ArB_] := N[(N[(ArB * N[(N[(N[(-0.14285714285714285 * N[(U * U), $MachinePrecision] + -0.2), $MachinePrecision] * N[(U * U), $MachinePrecision] + -0.3333333333333333), $MachinePrecision] * N[(U * U), $MachinePrecision] + -1.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] * U), $MachinePrecision]
f(U, ArB):
	U in [-inf, +inf],
	ArB in [-inf, +inf]
code: THEORY
BEGIN
f(U, ArB: real): real =
	(ArB * (((((((-142857142857142849212692681248881854116916656494140625e-54) * (U * U)) + (-200000000000000011102230246251565404236316680908203125e-54)) * (U * U)) + (-333333333333333314829616256247390992939472198486328125e-54)) * (U * U)) + (-1))) * U
END code
\left(ArB \cdot \mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(-0.14285714285714285, U \cdot U, -0.2\right), U \cdot U, -0.3333333333333333\right), U \cdot U, -1\right)\right) \cdot U
Derivation
  1. Initial program 30.5%

    \[0.5 \cdot \left(ArB \cdot \log \left(\frac{1 - U}{1 + U}\right)\right) \]
  2. Taylor expanded in U around 0

    \[\leadsto U \cdot \left(-1 \cdot ArB + {U}^{2} \cdot \left(\frac{-1}{3} \cdot ArB + {U}^{2} \cdot \left(\frac{-1}{5} \cdot ArB + \frac{-1}{7} \cdot \left(ArB \cdot {U}^{2}\right)\right)\right)\right) \]
  3. Applied rewrites99.7%

    \[\leadsto U \cdot \mathsf{fma}\left(-1, ArB, {U}^{2} \cdot \mathsf{fma}\left(-0.3333333333333333, ArB, {U}^{2} \cdot \mathsf{fma}\left(-0.2, ArB, -0.14285714285714285 \cdot \left(ArB \cdot {U}^{2}\right)\right)\right)\right) \]
  4. Applied rewrites99.7%

    \[\leadsto U \cdot \left(\left(U \cdot U\right) \cdot \mathsf{fma}\left(ArB \cdot \left(U \cdot U\right), \mathsf{fma}\left(-0.14285714285714285, U \cdot U, -0.2\right), -0.3333333333333333 \cdot ArB\right) - ArB\right) \]
  5. Applied rewrites99.7%

    \[\leadsto \left(\left(U \cdot U\right) \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(-0.14285714285714285, U \cdot U, -0.2\right), U \cdot U, -0.3333333333333333\right) \cdot ArB\right) - ArB\right) \cdot U \]
  6. Applied rewrites99.7%

    \[\leadsto \left(ArB \cdot \mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(-0.14285714285714285, U \cdot U, -0.2\right), U \cdot U, -0.3333333333333333\right), U \cdot U, -1\right)\right) \cdot U \]
  7. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 3: 99.6% accurate, 0.9× speedup?

\[\left(\left(U \cdot U\right) \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(-0.2, U \cdot U, -0.3333333333333333\right) \cdot ArB\right) - ArB\right) \cdot U \]
(FPCore (U ArB)
  :precision binary64
  :pre TRUE
  (*
 (- (* (* U U) (* (fma -0.2 (* U U) -0.3333333333333333) ArB)) ArB)
 U))
double code(double U, double ArB) {
	return (((U * U) * (fma(-0.2, (U * U), -0.3333333333333333) * ArB)) - ArB) * U;
}
function code(U, ArB)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(U * U) * Float64(fma(-0.2, Float64(U * U), -0.3333333333333333) * ArB)) - ArB) * U)
end
code[U_, ArB_] := N[(N[(N[(N[(U * U), $MachinePrecision] * N[(N[(-0.2 * N[(U * U), $MachinePrecision] + -0.3333333333333333), $MachinePrecision] * ArB), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - ArB), $MachinePrecision] * U), $MachinePrecision]
f(U, ArB):
	U in [-inf, +inf],
	ArB in [-inf, +inf]
code: THEORY
BEGIN
f(U, ArB: real): real =
	(((U * U) * ((((-200000000000000011102230246251565404236316680908203125e-54) * (U * U)) + (-333333333333333314829616256247390992939472198486328125e-54)) * ArB)) - ArB) * U
END code
\left(\left(U \cdot U\right) \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(-0.2, U \cdot U, -0.3333333333333333\right) \cdot ArB\right) - ArB\right) \cdot U
Derivation
  1. Initial program 30.5%

    \[0.5 \cdot \left(ArB \cdot \log \left(\frac{1 - U}{1 + U}\right)\right) \]
  2. Taylor expanded in U around 0

    \[\leadsto U \cdot \left(-1 \cdot ArB + {U}^{2} \cdot \left(\frac{-1}{3} \cdot ArB + {U}^{2} \cdot \left(\frac{-1}{5} \cdot ArB + \frac{-1}{7} \cdot \left(ArB \cdot {U}^{2}\right)\right)\right)\right) \]
  3. Applied rewrites99.7%

    \[\leadsto U \cdot \mathsf{fma}\left(-1, ArB, {U}^{2} \cdot \mathsf{fma}\left(-0.3333333333333333, ArB, {U}^{2} \cdot \mathsf{fma}\left(-0.2, ArB, -0.14285714285714285 \cdot \left(ArB \cdot {U}^{2}\right)\right)\right)\right) \]
  4. Applied rewrites99.7%

    \[\leadsto U \cdot \left(\left(U \cdot U\right) \cdot \mathsf{fma}\left(ArB \cdot \left(U \cdot U\right), \mathsf{fma}\left(-0.14285714285714285, U \cdot U, -0.2\right), -0.3333333333333333 \cdot ArB\right) - ArB\right) \]
  5. Applied rewrites99.7%

    \[\leadsto \left(\left(U \cdot U\right) \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(-0.14285714285714285, U \cdot U, -0.2\right), U \cdot U, -0.3333333333333333\right) \cdot ArB\right) - ArB\right) \cdot U \]
  6. Taylor expanded in U around 0

    \[\leadsto \left(\left(U \cdot U\right) \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(\frac{-1}{5}, U \cdot U, -0.3333333333333333\right) \cdot ArB\right) - ArB\right) \cdot U \]
  7. Applied rewrites99.6%

    \[\leadsto \left(\left(U \cdot U\right) \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(-0.2, U \cdot U, -0.3333333333333333\right) \cdot ArB\right) - ArB\right) \cdot U \]
  8. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 4: 99.5% accurate, 1.2× speedup?

\[\left(\left(U \cdot U\right) \cdot U\right) \cdot \left(-0.3333333333333333 \cdot ArB\right) - ArB \cdot U \]
(FPCore (U ArB)
  :precision binary64
  :pre TRUE
  (- (* (* (* U U) U) (* -0.3333333333333333 ArB)) (* ArB U)))
double code(double U, double ArB) {
	return (((U * U) * U) * (-0.3333333333333333 * ArB)) - (ArB * U);
}
real(8) function code(u, arb)
use fmin_fmax_functions
    real(8), intent (in) :: u
    real(8), intent (in) :: arb
    code = (((u * u) * u) * ((-0.3333333333333333d0) * arb)) - (arb * u)
end function
public static double code(double U, double ArB) {
	return (((U * U) * U) * (-0.3333333333333333 * ArB)) - (ArB * U);
}
def code(U, ArB):
	return (((U * U) * U) * (-0.3333333333333333 * ArB)) - (ArB * U)
function code(U, ArB)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(U * U) * U) * Float64(-0.3333333333333333 * ArB)) - Float64(ArB * U))
end
function tmp = code(U, ArB)
	tmp = (((U * U) * U) * (-0.3333333333333333 * ArB)) - (ArB * U);
end
code[U_, ArB_] := N[(N[(N[(N[(U * U), $MachinePrecision] * U), $MachinePrecision] * N[(-0.3333333333333333 * ArB), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - N[(ArB * U), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]
f(U, ArB):
	U in [-inf, +inf],
	ArB in [-inf, +inf]
code: THEORY
BEGIN
f(U, ArB: real): real =
	(((U * U) * U) * ((-333333333333333314829616256247390992939472198486328125e-54) * ArB)) - (ArB * U)
END code
\left(\left(U \cdot U\right) \cdot U\right) \cdot \left(-0.3333333333333333 \cdot ArB\right) - ArB \cdot U
Derivation
  1. Initial program 30.5%

    \[0.5 \cdot \left(ArB \cdot \log \left(\frac{1 - U}{1 + U}\right)\right) \]
  2. Taylor expanded in U around 0

    \[\leadsto U \cdot \left(-1 \cdot ArB + \frac{-1}{3} \cdot \left(ArB \cdot {U}^{2}\right)\right) \]
  3. Applied rewrites99.5%

    \[\leadsto U \cdot \mathsf{fma}\left(-1, ArB, -0.3333333333333333 \cdot \left(ArB \cdot {U}^{2}\right)\right) \]
  4. Applied rewrites99.5%

    \[\leadsto \left(\left(U \cdot U\right) \cdot U\right) \cdot \left(-0.3333333333333333 \cdot ArB\right) - ArB \cdot U \]
  5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 5: 99.5% accurate, 1.5× speedup?

\[\mathsf{fma}\left(-0.3333333333333333, U \cdot U, -1\right) \cdot \left(ArB \cdot U\right) \]
(FPCore (U ArB)
  :precision binary64
  :pre TRUE
  (* (fma -0.3333333333333333 (* U U) -1.0) (* ArB U)))
double code(double U, double ArB) {
	return fma(-0.3333333333333333, (U * U), -1.0) * (ArB * U);
}
function code(U, ArB)
	return Float64(fma(-0.3333333333333333, Float64(U * U), -1.0) * Float64(ArB * U))
end
code[U_, ArB_] := N[(N[(-0.3333333333333333 * N[(U * U), $MachinePrecision] + -1.0), $MachinePrecision] * N[(ArB * U), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]
f(U, ArB):
	U in [-inf, +inf],
	ArB in [-inf, +inf]
code: THEORY
BEGIN
f(U, ArB: real): real =
	(((-333333333333333314829616256247390992939472198486328125e-54) * (U * U)) + (-1)) * (ArB * U)
END code
\mathsf{fma}\left(-0.3333333333333333, U \cdot U, -1\right) \cdot \left(ArB \cdot U\right)
Derivation
  1. Initial program 30.5%

    \[0.5 \cdot \left(ArB \cdot \log \left(\frac{1 - U}{1 + U}\right)\right) \]
  2. Taylor expanded in U around 0

    \[\leadsto U \cdot \left(-1 \cdot ArB + \frac{-1}{3} \cdot \left(ArB \cdot {U}^{2}\right)\right) \]
  3. Applied rewrites99.5%

    \[\leadsto U \cdot \mathsf{fma}\left(-1, ArB, -0.3333333333333333 \cdot \left(ArB \cdot {U}^{2}\right)\right) \]
  4. Applied rewrites99.5%

    \[\leadsto U \cdot \left(ArB \cdot \mathsf{fma}\left(-0.3333333333333333, U \cdot U, -1\right)\right) \]
  5. Applied rewrites99.5%

    \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(-0.3333333333333333, U \cdot U, -1\right) \cdot \left(ArB \cdot U\right) \]
  6. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 6: 99.5% accurate, 1.5× speedup?

\[U \cdot \left(ArB \cdot \mathsf{fma}\left(-0.3333333333333333, U \cdot U, -1\right)\right) \]
(FPCore (U ArB)
  :precision binary64
  :pre TRUE
  (* U (* ArB (fma -0.3333333333333333 (* U U) -1.0))))
double code(double U, double ArB) {
	return U * (ArB * fma(-0.3333333333333333, (U * U), -1.0));
}
function code(U, ArB)
	return Float64(U * Float64(ArB * fma(-0.3333333333333333, Float64(U * U), -1.0)))
end
code[U_, ArB_] := N[(U * N[(ArB * N[(-0.3333333333333333 * N[(U * U), $MachinePrecision] + -1.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]
f(U, ArB):
	U in [-inf, +inf],
	ArB in [-inf, +inf]
code: THEORY
BEGIN
f(U, ArB: real): real =
	U * (ArB * (((-333333333333333314829616256247390992939472198486328125e-54) * (U * U)) + (-1)))
END code
U \cdot \left(ArB \cdot \mathsf{fma}\left(-0.3333333333333333, U \cdot U, -1\right)\right)
Derivation
  1. Initial program 30.5%

    \[0.5 \cdot \left(ArB \cdot \log \left(\frac{1 - U}{1 + U}\right)\right) \]
  2. Taylor expanded in U around 0

    \[\leadsto U \cdot \left(-1 \cdot ArB + \frac{-1}{3} \cdot \left(ArB \cdot {U}^{2}\right)\right) \]
  3. Applied rewrites99.5%

    \[\leadsto U \cdot \mathsf{fma}\left(-1, ArB, -0.3333333333333333 \cdot \left(ArB \cdot {U}^{2}\right)\right) \]
  4. Applied rewrites99.5%

    \[\leadsto U \cdot \left(ArB \cdot \mathsf{fma}\left(-0.3333333333333333, U \cdot U, -1\right)\right) \]
  5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 7: 99.0% accurate, 4.4× speedup?

\[-ArB \cdot U \]
(FPCore (U ArB)
  :precision binary64
  :pre TRUE
  (- (* ArB U)))
double code(double U, double ArB) {
	return -(ArB * U);
}
real(8) function code(u, arb)
use fmin_fmax_functions
    real(8), intent (in) :: u
    real(8), intent (in) :: arb
    code = -(arb * u)
end function
public static double code(double U, double ArB) {
	return -(ArB * U);
}
def code(U, ArB):
	return -(ArB * U)
function code(U, ArB)
	return Float64(-Float64(ArB * U))
end
function tmp = code(U, ArB)
	tmp = -(ArB * U);
end
code[U_, ArB_] := (-N[(ArB * U), $MachinePrecision])
f(U, ArB):
	U in [-inf, +inf],
	ArB in [-inf, +inf]
code: THEORY
BEGIN
f(U, ArB: real): real =
	- (ArB * U)
END code
-ArB \cdot U
Derivation
  1. Initial program 30.5%

    \[0.5 \cdot \left(ArB \cdot \log \left(\frac{1 - U}{1 + U}\right)\right) \]
  2. Taylor expanded in U around 0

    \[\leadsto -1 \cdot \left(ArB \cdot U\right) \]
  3. Applied rewrites99.0%

    \[\leadsto -1 \cdot \left(ArB \cdot U\right) \]
  4. Applied rewrites99.0%

    \[\leadsto -ArB \cdot U \]
  5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 8: 1.9% accurate, 4.6× speedup?

\[\frac{ArB}{U} \]
(FPCore (U ArB)
  :precision binary64
  :pre TRUE
  (/ ArB U))
double code(double U, double ArB) {
	return ArB / U;
}
real(8) function code(u, arb)
use fmin_fmax_functions
    real(8), intent (in) :: u
    real(8), intent (in) :: arb
    code = arb / u
end function
public static double code(double U, double ArB) {
	return ArB / U;
}
def code(U, ArB):
	return ArB / U
function code(U, ArB)
	return Float64(ArB / U)
end
function tmp = code(U, ArB)
	tmp = ArB / U;
end
code[U_, ArB_] := N[(ArB / U), $MachinePrecision]
f(U, ArB):
	U in [-inf, +inf],
	ArB in [-inf, +inf]
code: THEORY
BEGIN
f(U, ArB: real): real =
	ArB / U
END code
\frac{ArB}{U}
Derivation
  1. Initial program 30.5%

    \[0.5 \cdot \left(ArB \cdot \log \left(\frac{1 - U}{1 + U}\right)\right) \]
  2. Taylor expanded in U around inf

    \[\leadsto \frac{ArB}{U} \]
  3. Applied rewrites1.9%

    \[\leadsto \frac{ArB}{U} \]
  4. Add Preprocessing

Reproduce

?
herbie shell --seed 2026050 +o generate:egglog
(FPCore (U ArB)
  :name "forward-v"
  :precision binary64
  (* 0.5 (* ArB (log (/ (- 1.0 U) (+ 1.0 U))))))