Sample trimmed logistic on [-pi, pi]

Percentage Accurate: 98.9% → 99.0%
Time: 5.0s
Alternatives: 10
Speedup: 1.0×

Specification

?
\[\left(2.328306437 \cdot 10^{-10} \leq u \land u \leq 1\right) \land \left(0 \leq s \land s \leq 1.0651631\right)\]
\[\begin{array}{l} t_0 := \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\\ \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - t\_0\right) + t\_0} - 1\right) \end{array} \]
(FPCore (u s)
  :precision binary32
  :pre (and (and (<= 2.328306437e-10 u) (<= u 1.0))
     (and (<= 0.0 s) (<= s 1.0651631)))
  (let* ((t_0 (/ 1.0 (+ 1.0 (exp (/ PI s))))))
  (*
   (- s)
   (log
    (-
     (/ 1.0 (+ (* u (- (/ 1.0 (+ 1.0 (exp (/ (- PI) s)))) t_0)) t_0))
     1.0)))))
float code(float u, float s) {
	float t_0 = 1.0f / (1.0f + expf((((float) M_PI) / s)));
	return -s * logf(((1.0f / ((u * ((1.0f / (1.0f + expf((-((float) M_PI) / s)))) - t_0)) + t_0)) - 1.0f));
}
function code(u, s)
	t_0 = Float32(Float32(1.0) / Float32(Float32(1.0) + exp(Float32(Float32(pi) / s))))
	return Float32(Float32(-s) * log(Float32(Float32(Float32(1.0) / Float32(Float32(u * Float32(Float32(Float32(1.0) / Float32(Float32(1.0) + exp(Float32(Float32(-Float32(pi)) / s)))) - t_0)) + t_0)) - Float32(1.0))))
end
function tmp = code(u, s)
	t_0 = single(1.0) / (single(1.0) + exp((single(pi) / s)));
	tmp = -s * log(((single(1.0) / ((u * ((single(1.0) / (single(1.0) + exp((-single(pi) / s)))) - t_0)) + t_0)) - single(1.0)));
end
\begin{array}{l}
t_0 := \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\\
\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - t\_0\right) + t\_0} - 1\right)
\end{array}

Local Percentage Accuracy vs ?

The average percentage accuracy by input value. Horizontal axis shows value of an input variable; the variable is choosen in the title. Vertical axis is accuracy; higher is better. Red represent the original program, while blue represents Herbie's suggestion. These can be toggled with buttons below the plot. The line is an average while dots represent individual samples.

Accuracy vs Speed?

Herbie found 10 alternatives:

AlternativeAccuracySpeedup
The accuracy (vertical axis) and speed (horizontal axis) of each alternatives. Up and to the right is better. The red square shows the initial program, and each blue circle shows an alternative.The line shows the best available speed-accuracy tradeoffs.

Initial Program: 98.9% accurate, 1.0× speedup?

\[\left(2.328306437 \cdot 10^{-10} \leq u \land u \leq 1\right) \land \left(0 \leq s \land s \leq 1.0651631\right)\]
\[\begin{array}{l} t_0 := \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\\ \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - t\_0\right) + t\_0} - 1\right) \end{array} \]
(FPCore (u s)
  :precision binary32
  :pre (and (and (<= 2.328306437e-10 u) (<= u 1.0))
     (and (<= 0.0 s) (<= s 1.0651631)))
  (let* ((t_0 (/ 1.0 (+ 1.0 (exp (/ PI s))))))
  (*
   (- s)
   (log
    (-
     (/ 1.0 (+ (* u (- (/ 1.0 (+ 1.0 (exp (/ (- PI) s)))) t_0)) t_0))
     1.0)))))
float code(float u, float s) {
	float t_0 = 1.0f / (1.0f + expf((((float) M_PI) / s)));
	return -s * logf(((1.0f / ((u * ((1.0f / (1.0f + expf((-((float) M_PI) / s)))) - t_0)) + t_0)) - 1.0f));
}
function code(u, s)
	t_0 = Float32(Float32(1.0) / Float32(Float32(1.0) + exp(Float32(Float32(pi) / s))))
	return Float32(Float32(-s) * log(Float32(Float32(Float32(1.0) / Float32(Float32(u * Float32(Float32(Float32(1.0) / Float32(Float32(1.0) + exp(Float32(Float32(-Float32(pi)) / s)))) - t_0)) + t_0)) - Float32(1.0))))
end
function tmp = code(u, s)
	t_0 = single(1.0) / (single(1.0) + exp((single(pi) / s)));
	tmp = -s * log(((single(1.0) / ((u * ((single(1.0) / (single(1.0) + exp((-single(pi) / s)))) - t_0)) + t_0)) - single(1.0)));
end
\begin{array}{l}
t_0 := \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\\
\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - t\_0\right) + t\_0} - 1\right)
\end{array}

Alternative 1: 99.0% accurate, 0.5× speedup?

\[\left(2.328306437 \cdot 10^{-10} \leq u \land u \leq 1\right) \land \left(0 \leq s \land s \leq 1.0651631\right)\]
\[\begin{array}{l} t_0 := e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}\\ t_1 := \left(\left(\left(\frac{1}{\mathsf{fma}\left(t\_0, u, u\right)} - \frac{-1}{e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}} - -1}\right) - \frac{-1}{-1 - t\_0}\right) \cdot u\right) \cdot 2\\ \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{2 - t\_1}{t\_1}\right) \end{array} \]
(FPCore (u s)
  :precision binary32
  :pre (and (and (<= 2.328306437e-10 u) (<= u 1.0))
     (and (<= 0.0 s) (<= s 1.0651631)))
  (let* ((t_0 (exp (/ PI s)))
       (t_1
        (*
         (*
          (-
           (-
            (/ 1.0 (fma t_0 u u))
            (/ -1.0 (- (exp (/ (- PI) s)) -1.0)))
           (/ -1.0 (- -1.0 t_0)))
          u)
         2.0)))
  (* (- s) (log (/ (- 2.0 t_1) t_1)))))
float code(float u, float s) {
	float t_0 = expf((((float) M_PI) / s));
	float t_1 = ((((1.0f / fmaf(t_0, u, u)) - (-1.0f / (expf((-((float) M_PI) / s)) - -1.0f))) - (-1.0f / (-1.0f - t_0))) * u) * 2.0f;
	return -s * logf(((2.0f - t_1) / t_1));
}
function code(u, s)
	t_0 = exp(Float32(Float32(pi) / s))
	t_1 = Float32(Float32(Float32(Float32(Float32(Float32(1.0) / fma(t_0, u, u)) - Float32(Float32(-1.0) / Float32(exp(Float32(Float32(-Float32(pi)) / s)) - Float32(-1.0)))) - Float32(Float32(-1.0) / Float32(Float32(-1.0) - t_0))) * u) * Float32(2.0))
	return Float32(Float32(-s) * log(Float32(Float32(Float32(2.0) - t_1) / t_1)))
end
\begin{array}{l}
t_0 := e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}\\
t_1 := \left(\left(\left(\frac{1}{\mathsf{fma}\left(t\_0, u, u\right)} - \frac{-1}{e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}} - -1}\right) - \frac{-1}{-1 - t\_0}\right) \cdot u\right) \cdot 2\\
\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{2 - t\_1}{t\_1}\right)
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Initial program 98.9%

    \[\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} - 1\right) \]
  2. Taylor expanded in u around inf

    \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}\right)} + \frac{1}{1 + e^{-1 \cdot \frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right)} - 1\right) \]
  3. Step-by-step derivation
    1. Applied rewrites98.9%

      \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}\right)} + \frac{1}{1 + e^{-1 \cdot \frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right)} - 1\right) \]
    2. Step-by-step derivation
      1. Applied rewrites98.9%

        \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\left(\frac{1}{\mathsf{fma}\left(e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}, u, u\right)} - \frac{-1}{e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}} - -1}\right) - \frac{1}{e^{\frac{\pi}{s}} - -1}\right)} - 1\right) \]
      2. Step-by-step derivation
        1. Applied rewrites99.0%

          \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{2 - \left(\left(\left(\frac{1}{\mathsf{fma}\left(e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}, u, u\right)} - \frac{-1}{e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}} - -1}\right) - \frac{-1}{-1 - e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) \cdot u\right) \cdot 2}{\left(\left(\left(\frac{1}{\mathsf{fma}\left(e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}, u, u\right)} - \frac{-1}{e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}} - -1}\right) - \frac{-1}{-1 - e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) \cdot u\right) \cdot 2}\right) \]
        2. Add Preprocessing

        Alternative 2: 98.9% accurate, 1.0× speedup?

        \[\left(2.328306437 \cdot 10^{-10} \leq u \land u \leq 1\right) \land \left(0 \leq s \land s \leq 1.0651631\right)\]
        \[\begin{array}{l} t_0 := e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}\\ \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\left(\frac{1}{\mathsf{fma}\left(t\_0, u, u\right)} - \frac{-1}{e^{\frac{-3.1415927410125732}{s}} - -1}\right) - \frac{1}{t\_0 - -1}\right)} - 1\right) \end{array} \]
        (FPCore (u s)
          :precision binary32
          :pre (and (and (<= 2.328306437e-10 u) (<= u 1.0))
             (and (<= 0.0 s) (<= s 1.0651631)))
          (let* ((t_0 (exp (/ PI s))))
          (*
           (- s)
           (log
            (-
             (/
              1.0
              (*
               u
               (-
                (-
                 (/ 1.0 (fma t_0 u u))
                 (/ -1.0 (- (exp (/ -3.1415927410125732 s)) -1.0)))
                (/ 1.0 (- t_0 -1.0)))))
             1.0)))))
        float code(float u, float s) {
        	float t_0 = expf((((float) M_PI) / s));
        	return -s * logf(((1.0f / (u * (((1.0f / fmaf(t_0, u, u)) - (-1.0f / (expf((-3.1415927410125732f / s)) - -1.0f))) - (1.0f / (t_0 - -1.0f))))) - 1.0f));
        }
        
        function code(u, s)
        	t_0 = exp(Float32(Float32(pi) / s))
        	return Float32(Float32(-s) * log(Float32(Float32(Float32(1.0) / Float32(u * Float32(Float32(Float32(Float32(1.0) / fma(t_0, u, u)) - Float32(Float32(-1.0) / Float32(exp(Float32(Float32(-3.1415927410125732) / s)) - Float32(-1.0)))) - Float32(Float32(1.0) / Float32(t_0 - Float32(-1.0)))))) - Float32(1.0))))
        end
        
        \begin{array}{l}
        t_0 := e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}\\
        \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\left(\frac{1}{\mathsf{fma}\left(t\_0, u, u\right)} - \frac{-1}{e^{\frac{-3.1415927410125732}{s}} - -1}\right) - \frac{1}{t\_0 - -1}\right)} - 1\right)
        \end{array}
        
        Derivation
        1. Initial program 98.9%

          \[\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} - 1\right) \]
        2. Taylor expanded in u around inf

          \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}\right)} + \frac{1}{1 + e^{-1 \cdot \frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right)} - 1\right) \]
        3. Step-by-step derivation
          1. Applied rewrites98.9%

            \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}\right)} + \frac{1}{1 + e^{-1 \cdot \frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right)} - 1\right) \]
          2. Step-by-step derivation
            1. Applied rewrites98.9%

              \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\left(\frac{1}{\mathsf{fma}\left(e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}, u, u\right)} - \frac{-1}{e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}} - -1}\right) - \frac{1}{e^{\frac{\pi}{s}} - -1}\right)} - 1\right) \]
            2. Evaluated real constant98.9%

              \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\left(\frac{1}{\mathsf{fma}\left(e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}, u, u\right)} - \frac{-1}{e^{\frac{-3.1415927410125732}{s}} - -1}\right) - \frac{1}{e^{\frac{\pi}{s}} - -1}\right)} - 1\right) \]
            3. Add Preprocessing

            Alternative 3: 97.6% accurate, 1.3× speedup?

            \[\left(2.328306437 \cdot 10^{-10} \leq u \land u \leq 1\right) \land \left(0 \leq s \land s \leq 1.0651631\right)\]
            \[\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{-1 \cdot \frac{\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right)} - 1\right) \]
            (FPCore (u s)
              :precision binary32
              :pre (and (and (<= 2.328306437e-10 u) (<= u 1.0))
                 (and (<= 0.0 s) (<= s 1.0651631)))
              (*
             (- s)
             (log
              (-
               (/
                1.0
                (*
                 u
                 (-
                  (/ 1.0 (+ 1.0 (exp (* -1.0 (/ PI s)))))
                  (/ 1.0 (+ 1.0 (exp (/ PI s)))))))
               1.0))))
            float code(float u, float s) {
            	return -s * logf(((1.0f / (u * ((1.0f / (1.0f + expf((-1.0f * (((float) M_PI) / s))))) - (1.0f / (1.0f + expf((((float) M_PI) / s))))))) - 1.0f));
            }
            
            function code(u, s)
            	return Float32(Float32(-s) * log(Float32(Float32(Float32(1.0) / Float32(u * Float32(Float32(Float32(1.0) / Float32(Float32(1.0) + exp(Float32(Float32(-1.0) * Float32(Float32(pi) / s))))) - Float32(Float32(1.0) / Float32(Float32(1.0) + exp(Float32(Float32(pi) / s))))))) - Float32(1.0))))
            end
            
            function tmp = code(u, s)
            	tmp = -s * log(((single(1.0) / (u * ((single(1.0) / (single(1.0) + exp((single(-1.0) * (single(pi) / s))))) - (single(1.0) / (single(1.0) + exp((single(pi) / s))))))) - single(1.0)));
            end
            
            \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{-1 \cdot \frac{\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right)} - 1\right)
            
            Derivation
            1. Initial program 98.9%

              \[\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} - 1\right) \]
            2. Taylor expanded in u around inf

              \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{-1 \cdot \frac{\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right)} - 1\right) \]
            3. Step-by-step derivation
              1. Applied rewrites97.6%

                \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{-1 \cdot \frac{\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right)} - 1\right) \]
              2. Add Preprocessing

              Alternative 4: 85.6% accurate, 1.3× speedup?

              \[\left(2.328306437 \cdot 10^{-10} \leq u \land u \leq 1\right) \land \left(0 \leq s \land s \leq 1.0651631\right)\]
              \[\begin{array}{l} t_0 := \frac{1}{2 + \frac{\pi}{s}}\\ \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-3.1415927410125732}{s}}} - t\_0\right) + t\_0} - 1\right) \end{array} \]
              (FPCore (u s)
                :precision binary32
                :pre (and (and (<= 2.328306437e-10 u) (<= u 1.0))
                   (and (<= 0.0 s) (<= s 1.0651631)))
                (let* ((t_0 (/ 1.0 (+ 2.0 (/ PI s)))))
                (*
                 (- s)
                 (log
                  (-
                   (/
                    1.0
                    (+
                     (* u (- (/ 1.0 (+ 1.0 (exp (/ -3.1415927410125732 s)))) t_0))
                     t_0))
                   1.0)))))
              float code(float u, float s) {
              	float t_0 = 1.0f / (2.0f + (((float) M_PI) / s));
              	return -s * logf(((1.0f / ((u * ((1.0f / (1.0f + expf((-3.1415927410125732f / s)))) - t_0)) + t_0)) - 1.0f));
              }
              
              function code(u, s)
              	t_0 = Float32(Float32(1.0) / Float32(Float32(2.0) + Float32(Float32(pi) / s)))
              	return Float32(Float32(-s) * log(Float32(Float32(Float32(1.0) / Float32(Float32(u * Float32(Float32(Float32(1.0) / Float32(Float32(1.0) + exp(Float32(Float32(-3.1415927410125732) / s)))) - t_0)) + t_0)) - Float32(1.0))))
              end
              
              function tmp = code(u, s)
              	t_0 = single(1.0) / (single(2.0) + (single(pi) / s));
              	tmp = -s * log(((single(1.0) / ((u * ((single(1.0) / (single(1.0) + exp((single(-3.1415927410125732) / s)))) - t_0)) + t_0)) - single(1.0)));
              end
              
              \begin{array}{l}
              t_0 := \frac{1}{2 + \frac{\pi}{s}}\\
              \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-3.1415927410125732}{s}}} - t\_0\right) + t\_0} - 1\right)
              \end{array}
              
              Derivation
              1. Initial program 98.9%

                \[\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} - 1\right) \]
              2. Taylor expanded in s around inf

                \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{2 + \frac{\pi}{s}}\right) + \frac{1}{2 + \frac{\pi}{s}}} - 1\right) \]
              3. Step-by-step derivation
                1. Applied rewrites85.6%

                  \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{2 + \frac{\pi}{s}}\right) + \frac{1}{2 + \frac{\pi}{s}}} - 1\right) \]
                2. Evaluated real constant85.6%

                  \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-3.1415927410125732}{s}}} - \frac{1}{2 + \frac{\pi}{s}}\right) + \frac{1}{2 + \frac{\pi}{s}}} - 1\right) \]
                3. Add Preprocessing

                Alternative 5: 85.0% accurate, 1.9× speedup?

                \[\left(2.328306437 \cdot 10^{-10} \leq u \land u \leq 1\right) \land \left(0 \leq s \land s \leq 1.0651631\right)\]
                \[\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(\frac{1}{1 + 2 \cdot \frac{u \cdot \left(0.25 \cdot \pi - -0.25 \cdot \pi\right)}{s}}, \frac{\pi}{s} - -2, -1\right)\right) \]
                (FPCore (u s)
                  :precision binary32
                  :pre (and (and (<= 2.328306437e-10 u) (<= u 1.0))
                     (and (<= 0.0 s) (<= s 1.0651631)))
                  (*
                 (- s)
                 (log
                  (fma
                   (/ 1.0 (+ 1.0 (* 2.0 (/ (* u (- (* 0.25 PI) (* -0.25 PI))) s))))
                   (- (/ PI s) -2.0)
                   -1.0))))
                float code(float u, float s) {
                	return -s * logf(fmaf((1.0f / (1.0f + (2.0f * ((u * ((0.25f * ((float) M_PI)) - (-0.25f * ((float) M_PI)))) / s)))), ((((float) M_PI) / s) - -2.0f), -1.0f));
                }
                
                function code(u, s)
                	return Float32(Float32(-s) * log(fma(Float32(Float32(1.0) / Float32(Float32(1.0) + Float32(Float32(2.0) * Float32(Float32(u * Float32(Float32(Float32(0.25) * Float32(pi)) - Float32(Float32(-0.25) * Float32(pi)))) / s)))), Float32(Float32(Float32(pi) / s) - Float32(-2.0)), Float32(-1.0))))
                end
                
                \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(\frac{1}{1 + 2 \cdot \frac{u \cdot \left(0.25 \cdot \pi - -0.25 \cdot \pi\right)}{s}}, \frac{\pi}{s} - -2, -1\right)\right)
                
                Derivation
                1. Initial program 98.9%

                  \[\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} - 1\right) \]
                2. Taylor expanded in s around inf

                  \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{2 + \frac{\pi}{s}}\right) + \frac{1}{2 + \frac{\pi}{s}}} - 1\right) \]
                3. Step-by-step derivation
                  1. Applied rewrites85.6%

                    \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{2 + \frac{\pi}{s}}\right) + \frac{1}{2 + \frac{\pi}{s}}} - 1\right) \]
                  2. Step-by-step derivation
                    1. Applied rewrites85.0%

                      \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(\frac{1}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\frac{1}{e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}} - -1} - \frac{1}{\frac{\pi}{s} - -2}, u \cdot \left(\frac{\pi}{s} - -2\right), 1\right)}, \frac{\pi}{s} - -2, -1\right)\right) \]
                    2. Taylor expanded in s around inf

                      \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(\frac{1}{1 + 2 \cdot \frac{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{4} \cdot \pi - \frac{-1}{4} \cdot \pi\right)}{s}}, \frac{\pi}{s} - -2, -1\right)\right) \]
                    3. Step-by-step derivation
                      1. Applied rewrites85.0%

                        \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(\frac{1}{1 + 2 \cdot \frac{u \cdot \left(0.25 \cdot \pi - -0.25 \cdot \pi\right)}{s}}, \frac{\pi}{s} - -2, -1\right)\right) \]
                      2. Add Preprocessing

                      Alternative 6: 36.0% accurate, 2.0× speedup?

                      \[\left(2.328306437 \cdot 10^{-10} \leq u \land u \leq 1\right) \land \left(0 \leq s \land s \leq 1.0651631\right)\]
                      \[\begin{array}{l} t_0 := \frac{1}{2 + \frac{\pi}{s}}\\ \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(0.5 - t\_0\right) + t\_0} - 1\right) \end{array} \]
                      (FPCore (u s)
                        :precision binary32
                        :pre (and (and (<= 2.328306437e-10 u) (<= u 1.0))
                           (and (<= 0.0 s) (<= s 1.0651631)))
                        (let* ((t_0 (/ 1.0 (+ 2.0 (/ PI s)))))
                        (* (- s) (log (- (/ 1.0 (+ (* u (- 0.5 t_0)) t_0)) 1.0)))))
                      float code(float u, float s) {
                      	float t_0 = 1.0f / (2.0f + (((float) M_PI) / s));
                      	return -s * logf(((1.0f / ((u * (0.5f - t_0)) + t_0)) - 1.0f));
                      }
                      
                      function code(u, s)
                      	t_0 = Float32(Float32(1.0) / Float32(Float32(2.0) + Float32(Float32(pi) / s)))
                      	return Float32(Float32(-s) * log(Float32(Float32(Float32(1.0) / Float32(Float32(u * Float32(Float32(0.5) - t_0)) + t_0)) - Float32(1.0))))
                      end
                      
                      function tmp = code(u, s)
                      	t_0 = single(1.0) / (single(2.0) + (single(pi) / s));
                      	tmp = -s * log(((single(1.0) / ((u * (single(0.5) - t_0)) + t_0)) - single(1.0)));
                      end
                      
                      \begin{array}{l}
                      t_0 := \frac{1}{2 + \frac{\pi}{s}}\\
                      \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(0.5 - t\_0\right) + t\_0} - 1\right)
                      \end{array}
                      
                      Derivation
                      1. Initial program 98.9%

                        \[\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} - 1\right) \]
                      2. Taylor expanded in s around inf

                        \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{2 + \frac{\pi}{s}}\right) + \frac{1}{2 + \frac{\pi}{s}}} - 1\right) \]
                      3. Step-by-step derivation
                        1. Applied rewrites85.6%

                          \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{2 + \frac{\pi}{s}}\right) + \frac{1}{2 + \frac{\pi}{s}}} - 1\right) \]
                        2. Taylor expanded in s around inf

                          \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{2} - \frac{1}{2 + \frac{\pi}{s}}\right) + \frac{1}{2 + \frac{\pi}{s}}} - 1\right) \]
                        3. Step-by-step derivation
                          1. Applied rewrites36.0%

                            \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(0.5 - \frac{1}{2 + \frac{\pi}{s}}\right) + \frac{1}{2 + \frac{\pi}{s}}} - 1\right) \]
                          2. Add Preprocessing

                          Alternative 7: 25.1% accurate, 4.5× speedup?

                          \[\left(2.328306437 \cdot 10^{-10} \leq u \land u \leq 1\right) \land \left(0 \leq s \land s \leq 1.0651631\right)\]
                          \[\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\left(2 + \frac{\pi}{s}\right) - 1\right) \]
                          (FPCore (u s)
                            :precision binary32
                            :pre (and (and (<= 2.328306437e-10 u) (<= u 1.0))
                               (and (<= 0.0 s) (<= s 1.0651631)))
                            (* (- s) (log (- (+ 2.0 (/ PI s)) 1.0))))
                          float code(float u, float s) {
                          	return -s * logf(((2.0f + (((float) M_PI) / s)) - 1.0f));
                          }
                          
                          function code(u, s)
                          	return Float32(Float32(-s) * log(Float32(Float32(Float32(2.0) + Float32(Float32(pi) / s)) - Float32(1.0))))
                          end
                          
                          function tmp = code(u, s)
                          	tmp = -s * log(((single(2.0) + (single(pi) / s)) - single(1.0)));
                          end
                          
                          \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\left(2 + \frac{\pi}{s}\right) - 1\right)
                          
                          Derivation
                          1. Initial program 98.9%

                            \[\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} - 1\right) \]
                          2. Taylor expanded in u around inf

                            \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}\right)} + \frac{1}{1 + e^{-1 \cdot \frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right)} - 1\right) \]
                          3. Step-by-step derivation
                            1. Applied rewrites98.9%

                              \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}\right)} + \frac{1}{1 + e^{-1 \cdot \frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right)} - 1\right) \]
                            2. Step-by-step derivation
                              1. Applied rewrites98.9%

                                \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\left(\frac{1}{\mathsf{fma}\left(e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}, u, u\right)} - \frac{-1}{e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}} - -1}\right) - \frac{1}{e^{\frac{\pi}{s}} - -1}\right)} - 1\right) \]
                              2. Taylor expanded in s around -inf

                                \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\left(2 + 4 \cdot \frac{u \cdot \left(\frac{-1}{4} \cdot \pi - \frac{1}{4} \cdot \pi\right) - \frac{-1}{4} \cdot \pi}{s}\right) - 1\right) \]
                              3. Step-by-step derivation
                                1. Applied rewrites24.8%

                                  \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\left(2 + 4 \cdot \frac{u \cdot \left(-0.25 \cdot \pi - 0.25 \cdot \pi\right) - -0.25 \cdot \pi}{s}\right) - 1\right) \]
                                2. Taylor expanded in u around 0

                                  \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\left(2 + \frac{\pi}{s}\right) - 1\right) \]
                                3. Step-by-step derivation
                                  1. Applied rewrites25.1%

                                    \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\left(2 + \frac{\pi}{s}\right) - 1\right) \]
                                  2. Add Preprocessing

                                  Alternative 8: 11.4% accurate, 5.0× speedup?

                                  \[\left(2.328306437 \cdot 10^{-10} \leq u \land u \leq 1\right) \land \left(0 \leq s \land s \leq 1.0651631\right)\]
                                  \[{-1.4645918607711792}^{3} \]
                                  (FPCore (u s)
                                    :precision binary32
                                    :pre (and (and (<= 2.328306437e-10 u) (<= u 1.0))
                                       (and (<= 0.0 s) (<= s 1.0651631)))
                                    (pow -1.4645918607711792 3.0))
                                  float code(float u, float s) {
                                  	return powf(-1.4645918607711792f, 3.0f);
                                  }
                                  
                                  real(4) function code(u, s)
                                  use fmin_fmax_functions
                                      real(4), intent (in) :: u
                                      real(4), intent (in) :: s
                                      code = (-1.4645918607711792e0) ** 3.0e0
                                  end function
                                  
                                  function code(u, s)
                                  	return Float32(-1.4645918607711792) ^ Float32(3.0)
                                  end
                                  
                                  function tmp = code(u, s)
                                  	tmp = single(-1.4645918607711792) ^ single(3.0);
                                  end
                                  
                                  {-1.4645918607711792}^{3}
                                  
                                  Derivation
                                  1. Initial program 98.9%

                                    \[\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} - 1\right) \]
                                  2. Taylor expanded in u around 0

                                    \[\leadsto -1 \cdot \pi \]
                                  3. Step-by-step derivation
                                    1. Applied rewrites11.4%

                                      \[\leadsto -1 \cdot \pi \]
                                    2. Step-by-step derivation
                                      1. Applied rewrites11.4%

                                        \[\leadsto {\left(\sqrt[3]{-\pi}\right)}^{3} \]
                                      2. Evaluated real constant11.4%

                                        \[\leadsto {-1.4645918607711792}^{3} \]
                                      3. Add Preprocessing

                                      Alternative 9: 11.4% accurate, 90.2× speedup?

                                      \[\left(2.328306437 \cdot 10^{-10} \leq u \land u \leq 1\right) \land \left(0 \leq s \land s \leq 1.0651631\right)\]
                                      \[-3.1415927410125732 \]
                                      (FPCore (u s)
                                        :precision binary32
                                        :pre (and (and (<= 2.328306437e-10 u) (<= u 1.0))
                                           (and (<= 0.0 s) (<= s 1.0651631)))
                                        -3.1415927410125732)
                                      float code(float u, float s) {
                                      	return -3.1415927410125732f;
                                      }
                                      
                                      real(4) function code(u, s)
                                      use fmin_fmax_functions
                                          real(4), intent (in) :: u
                                          real(4), intent (in) :: s
                                          code = -3.1415927410125732e0
                                      end function
                                      
                                      function code(u, s)
                                      	return Float32(-3.1415927410125732)
                                      end
                                      
                                      function tmp = code(u, s)
                                      	tmp = single(-3.1415927410125732);
                                      end
                                      
                                      -3.1415927410125732
                                      
                                      Derivation
                                      1. Initial program 98.9%

                                        \[\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} - 1\right) \]
                                      2. Taylor expanded in u around 0

                                        \[\leadsto -1 \cdot \pi \]
                                      3. Step-by-step derivation
                                        1. Applied rewrites11.4%

                                          \[\leadsto -1 \cdot \pi \]
                                        2. Evaluated real constant11.4%

                                          \[\leadsto -3.1415927410125732 \]
                                        3. Add Preprocessing

                                        Reproduce

                                        ?
                                        herbie shell --seed 2025359 
                                        (FPCore (u s)
                                          :name "Sample trimmed logistic on [-pi, pi]"
                                          :precision binary32
                                          :pre (and (and (<= 2.328306437e-10 u) (<= u 1.0)) (and (<= 0.0 s) (<= s 1.0651631)))
                                          (* (- s) (log (- (/ 1.0 (+ (* u (- (/ 1.0 (+ 1.0 (exp (/ (- PI) s)))) (/ 1.0 (+ 1.0 (exp (/ PI s)))))) (/ 1.0 (+ 1.0 (exp (/ PI s)))))) 1.0))))