math.sqrt on complex, imaginary part, im greater than 0 branch

Percentage Accurate: 28.4% → 53.3%
Time: 2.8s
Alternatives: 5
Speedup: 1.6×

Specification

?
\[im > 0\]
\[0.5 \cdot \sqrt{2 \cdot \left(\sqrt{re \cdot re + im \cdot im} - re\right)} \]
(FPCore (re im)
  :precision binary64
  (* 0.5 (sqrt (* 2.0 (- (sqrt (+ (* re re) (* im im))) re)))))
double code(double re, double im) {
	return 0.5 * sqrt((2.0 * (sqrt(((re * re) + (im * im))) - re)));
}
real(8) function code(re, im)
use fmin_fmax_functions
    real(8), intent (in) :: re
    real(8), intent (in) :: im
    code = 0.5d0 * sqrt((2.0d0 * (sqrt(((re * re) + (im * im))) - re)))
end function
public static double code(double re, double im) {
	return 0.5 * Math.sqrt((2.0 * (Math.sqrt(((re * re) + (im * im))) - re)));
}
def code(re, im):
	return 0.5 * math.sqrt((2.0 * (math.sqrt(((re * re) + (im * im))) - re)))
function code(re, im)
	return Float64(0.5 * sqrt(Float64(2.0 * Float64(sqrt(Float64(Float64(re * re) + Float64(im * im))) - re))))
end
function tmp = code(re, im)
	tmp = 0.5 * sqrt((2.0 * (sqrt(((re * re) + (im * im))) - re)));
end
code[re_, im_] := N[(0.5 * N[Sqrt[N[(2.0 * N[(N[Sqrt[N[(N[(re * re), $MachinePrecision] + N[(im * im), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] - re), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]
0.5 \cdot \sqrt{2 \cdot \left(\sqrt{re \cdot re + im \cdot im} - re\right)}

Local Percentage Accuracy vs ?

The average percentage accuracy by input value. Horizontal axis shows value of an input variable; the variable is choosen in the title. Vertical axis is accuracy; higher is better. Red represent the original program, while blue represents Herbie's suggestion. These can be toggled with buttons below the plot. The line is an average while dots represent individual samples.

Accuracy vs Speed?

Herbie found 5 alternatives:

AlternativeAccuracySpeedup
The accuracy (vertical axis) and speed (horizontal axis) of each alternatives. Up and to the right is better. The red square shows the initial program, and each blue circle shows an alternative.The line shows the best available speed-accuracy tradeoffs.

Initial Program: 28.4% accurate, 1.0× speedup?

\[0.5 \cdot \sqrt{2 \cdot \left(\sqrt{re \cdot re + im \cdot im} - re\right)} \]
(FPCore (re im)
  :precision binary64
  (* 0.5 (sqrt (* 2.0 (- (sqrt (+ (* re re) (* im im))) re)))))
double code(double re, double im) {
	return 0.5 * sqrt((2.0 * (sqrt(((re * re) + (im * im))) - re)));
}
real(8) function code(re, im)
use fmin_fmax_functions
    real(8), intent (in) :: re
    real(8), intent (in) :: im
    code = 0.5d0 * sqrt((2.0d0 * (sqrt(((re * re) + (im * im))) - re)))
end function
public static double code(double re, double im) {
	return 0.5 * Math.sqrt((2.0 * (Math.sqrt(((re * re) + (im * im))) - re)));
}
def code(re, im):
	return 0.5 * math.sqrt((2.0 * (math.sqrt(((re * re) + (im * im))) - re)))
function code(re, im)
	return Float64(0.5 * sqrt(Float64(2.0 * Float64(sqrt(Float64(Float64(re * re) + Float64(im * im))) - re))))
end
function tmp = code(re, im)
	tmp = 0.5 * sqrt((2.0 * (sqrt(((re * re) + (im * im))) - re)));
end
code[re_, im_] := N[(0.5 * N[Sqrt[N[(2.0 * N[(N[Sqrt[N[(N[(re * re), $MachinePrecision] + N[(im * im), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] - re), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]
0.5 \cdot \sqrt{2 \cdot \left(\sqrt{re \cdot re + im \cdot im} - re\right)}

Alternative 1: 53.3% accurate, 0.3× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} t_0 := 0 \cdot \sqrt{\left|im\right| \cdot 2}\\ t_1 := 0.5 \cdot \sqrt{2 \cdot \left(\sqrt{re \cdot re + \left|im\right| \cdot \left|im\right|} - re\right)}\\ \mathbf{if}\;t\_1 \leq 2 \cdot 10^{+55}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_0\\ \mathbf{elif}\;t\_1 \leq 10^{+76}:\\ \;\;\;\;\sqrt{\left(\sqrt{\mathsf{fma}\left(\left|im\right|, \left|im\right|, re \cdot re\right)} - re\right) \cdot 2} \cdot 0.5\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_0\\ \end{array} \]
(FPCore (re im)
  :precision binary64
  (let* ((t_0 (* 0.0 (sqrt (* (fabs im) 2.0))))
       (t_1
        (*
         0.5
         (sqrt
          (*
           2.0
           (- (sqrt (+ (* re re) (* (fabs im) (fabs im)))) re))))))
  (if (<= t_1 2e+55)
    t_0
    (if (<= t_1 1e+76)
      (*
       (sqrt
        (* (- (sqrt (fma (fabs im) (fabs im) (* re re))) re) 2.0))
       0.5)
      t_0))))
double code(double re, double im) {
	double t_0 = 0.0 * sqrt((fabs(im) * 2.0));
	double t_1 = 0.5 * sqrt((2.0 * (sqrt(((re * re) + (fabs(im) * fabs(im)))) - re)));
	double tmp;
	if (t_1 <= 2e+55) {
		tmp = t_0;
	} else if (t_1 <= 1e+76) {
		tmp = sqrt(((sqrt(fma(fabs(im), fabs(im), (re * re))) - re) * 2.0)) * 0.5;
	} else {
		tmp = t_0;
	}
	return tmp;
}
function code(re, im)
	t_0 = Float64(0.0 * sqrt(Float64(abs(im) * 2.0)))
	t_1 = Float64(0.5 * sqrt(Float64(2.0 * Float64(sqrt(Float64(Float64(re * re) + Float64(abs(im) * abs(im)))) - re))))
	tmp = 0.0
	if (t_1 <= 2e+55)
		tmp = t_0;
	elseif (t_1 <= 1e+76)
		tmp = Float64(sqrt(Float64(Float64(sqrt(fma(abs(im), abs(im), Float64(re * re))) - re) * 2.0)) * 0.5);
	else
		tmp = t_0;
	end
	return tmp
end
code[re_, im_] := Block[{t$95$0 = N[(0.0 * N[Sqrt[N[(N[Abs[im], $MachinePrecision] * 2.0), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, Block[{t$95$1 = N[(0.5 * N[Sqrt[N[(2.0 * N[(N[Sqrt[N[(N[(re * re), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[Abs[im], $MachinePrecision] * N[Abs[im], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] - re), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[t$95$1, 2e+55], t$95$0, If[LessEqual[t$95$1, 1e+76], N[(N[Sqrt[N[(N[(N[Sqrt[N[(N[Abs[im], $MachinePrecision] * N[Abs[im], $MachinePrecision] + N[(re * re), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] - re), $MachinePrecision] * 2.0), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] * 0.5), $MachinePrecision], t$95$0]]]]
\begin{array}{l}
t_0 := 0 \cdot \sqrt{\left|im\right| \cdot 2}\\
t_1 := 0.5 \cdot \sqrt{2 \cdot \left(\sqrt{re \cdot re + \left|im\right| \cdot \left|im\right|} - re\right)}\\
\mathbf{if}\;t\_1 \leq 2 \cdot 10^{+55}:\\
\;\;\;\;t\_0\\

\mathbf{elif}\;t\_1 \leq 10^{+76}:\\
\;\;\;\;\sqrt{\left(\sqrt{\mathsf{fma}\left(\left|im\right|, \left|im\right|, re \cdot re\right)} - re\right) \cdot 2} \cdot 0.5\\

\mathbf{else}:\\
\;\;\;\;t\_0\\


\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Split input into 2 regimes
  2. if (*.f64 #s(literal 1/2 binary64) (sqrt.f64 (*.f64 #s(literal 2 binary64) (-.f64 (sqrt.f64 (+.f64 (*.f64 re re) (*.f64 im im))) re)))) < 2e55 or 1e76 < (*.f64 #s(literal 1/2 binary64) (sqrt.f64 (*.f64 #s(literal 2 binary64) (-.f64 (sqrt.f64 (+.f64 (*.f64 re re) (*.f64 im im))) re))))

    1. Initial program 28.4%

      \[0.5 \cdot \sqrt{2 \cdot \left(\sqrt{re \cdot re + im \cdot im} - re\right)} \]
    2. Taylor expanded in im around inf

      \[\leadsto 0.5 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{im \cdot \left(2 + -2 \cdot \frac{re}{im}\right)}} \]
    3. Step-by-step derivation
      1. lower-*.f64N/A

        \[\leadsto \frac{1}{2} \cdot \sqrt{im \cdot \color{blue}{\left(2 + -2 \cdot \frac{re}{im}\right)}} \]
      2. lower-+.f64N/A

        \[\leadsto \frac{1}{2} \cdot \sqrt{im \cdot \left(2 + \color{blue}{-2 \cdot \frac{re}{im}}\right)} \]
      3. lower-*.f64N/A

        \[\leadsto \frac{1}{2} \cdot \sqrt{im \cdot \left(2 + -2 \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{re}{im}}\right)} \]
      4. lower-/.f6427.9%

        \[\leadsto 0.5 \cdot \sqrt{im \cdot \left(2 + -2 \cdot \frac{re}{\color{blue}{im}}\right)} \]
    4. Applied rewrites27.9%

      \[\leadsto 0.5 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{im \cdot \left(2 + -2 \cdot \frac{re}{im}\right)}} \]
    5. Taylor expanded in re around 0

      \[\leadsto 0.5 \cdot \sqrt{im \cdot 2} \]
    6. Step-by-step derivation
      1. Applied rewrites26.9%

        \[\leadsto 0.5 \cdot \sqrt{im \cdot 2} \]
      2. Taylor expanded in undef-var around zero

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{0} \cdot \sqrt{im \cdot 2} \]
      3. Step-by-step derivation
        1. Applied rewrites3.3%

          \[\leadsto \color{blue}{0} \cdot \sqrt{im \cdot 2} \]

        if 2e55 < (*.f64 #s(literal 1/2 binary64) (sqrt.f64 (*.f64 #s(literal 2 binary64) (-.f64 (sqrt.f64 (+.f64 (*.f64 re re) (*.f64 im im))) re)))) < 1e76

        1. Initial program 28.4%

          \[0.5 \cdot \sqrt{2 \cdot \left(\sqrt{re \cdot re + im \cdot im} - re\right)} \]
        2. Step-by-step derivation
          1. lift-*.f64N/A

            \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1}{2} \cdot \sqrt{2 \cdot \left(\sqrt{re \cdot re + im \cdot im} - re\right)}} \]
          2. *-commutativeN/A

            \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\sqrt{2 \cdot \left(\sqrt{re \cdot re + im \cdot im} - re\right)} \cdot \frac{1}{2}} \]
          3. lower-*.f6428.4%

            \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\sqrt{2 \cdot \left(\sqrt{re \cdot re + im \cdot im} - re\right)} \cdot 0.5} \]
          4. lift-*.f64N/A

            \[\leadsto \sqrt{\color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(\sqrt{re \cdot re + im \cdot im} - re\right)}} \cdot \frac{1}{2} \]
          5. *-commutativeN/A

            \[\leadsto \sqrt{\color{blue}{\left(\sqrt{re \cdot re + im \cdot im} - re\right) \cdot 2}} \cdot \frac{1}{2} \]
          6. lower-*.f6428.4%

            \[\leadsto \sqrt{\color{blue}{\left(\sqrt{re \cdot re + im \cdot im} - re\right) \cdot 2}} \cdot 0.5 \]
          7. lift-+.f64N/A

            \[\leadsto \sqrt{\left(\sqrt{\color{blue}{re \cdot re + im \cdot im}} - re\right) \cdot 2} \cdot \frac{1}{2} \]
          8. +-commutativeN/A

            \[\leadsto \sqrt{\left(\sqrt{\color{blue}{im \cdot im + re \cdot re}} - re\right) \cdot 2} \cdot \frac{1}{2} \]
          9. lift-*.f64N/A

            \[\leadsto \sqrt{\left(\sqrt{\color{blue}{im \cdot im} + re \cdot re} - re\right) \cdot 2} \cdot \frac{1}{2} \]
          10. lower-fma.f6428.4%

            \[\leadsto \sqrt{\left(\sqrt{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(im, im, re \cdot re\right)}} - re\right) \cdot 2} \cdot 0.5 \]
        3. Applied rewrites28.4%

          \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\sqrt{\left(\sqrt{\mathsf{fma}\left(im, im, re \cdot re\right)} - re\right) \cdot 2} \cdot 0.5} \]
      4. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
      5. Add Preprocessing

      Alternative 2: 52.7% accurate, 1.6× speedup?

      \[\begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;re \leq -3.9 \cdot 10^{+220}:\\ \;\;\;\;0.5 \cdot \sqrt{-4 \cdot re}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;0 \cdot \sqrt{\left|im\right| \cdot 2}\\ \end{array} \]
      (FPCore (re im)
        :precision binary64
        (if (<= re -3.9e+220)
        (* 0.5 (sqrt (* -4.0 re)))
        (* 0.0 (sqrt (* (fabs im) 2.0)))))
      double code(double re, double im) {
      	double tmp;
      	if (re <= -3.9e+220) {
      		tmp = 0.5 * sqrt((-4.0 * re));
      	} else {
      		tmp = 0.0 * sqrt((fabs(im) * 2.0));
      	}
      	return tmp;
      }
      
      real(8) function code(re, im)
      use fmin_fmax_functions
          real(8), intent (in) :: re
          real(8), intent (in) :: im
          real(8) :: tmp
          if (re <= (-3.9d+220)) then
              tmp = 0.5d0 * sqrt(((-4.0d0) * re))
          else
              tmp = 0.0d0 * sqrt((abs(im) * 2.0d0))
          end if
          code = tmp
      end function
      
      public static double code(double re, double im) {
      	double tmp;
      	if (re <= -3.9e+220) {
      		tmp = 0.5 * Math.sqrt((-4.0 * re));
      	} else {
      		tmp = 0.0 * Math.sqrt((Math.abs(im) * 2.0));
      	}
      	return tmp;
      }
      
      def code(re, im):
      	tmp = 0
      	if re <= -3.9e+220:
      		tmp = 0.5 * math.sqrt((-4.0 * re))
      	else:
      		tmp = 0.0 * math.sqrt((math.fabs(im) * 2.0))
      	return tmp
      
      function code(re, im)
      	tmp = 0.0
      	if (re <= -3.9e+220)
      		tmp = Float64(0.5 * sqrt(Float64(-4.0 * re)));
      	else
      		tmp = Float64(0.0 * sqrt(Float64(abs(im) * 2.0)));
      	end
      	return tmp
      end
      
      function tmp_2 = code(re, im)
      	tmp = 0.0;
      	if (re <= -3.9e+220)
      		tmp = 0.5 * sqrt((-4.0 * re));
      	else
      		tmp = 0.0 * sqrt((abs(im) * 2.0));
      	end
      	tmp_2 = tmp;
      end
      
      code[re_, im_] := If[LessEqual[re, -3.9e+220], N[(0.5 * N[Sqrt[N[(-4.0 * re), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(0.0 * N[Sqrt[N[(N[Abs[im], $MachinePrecision] * 2.0), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]
      
      \begin{array}{l}
      \mathbf{if}\;re \leq -3.9 \cdot 10^{+220}:\\
      \;\;\;\;0.5 \cdot \sqrt{-4 \cdot re}\\
      
      \mathbf{else}:\\
      \;\;\;\;0 \cdot \sqrt{\left|im\right| \cdot 2}\\
      
      
      \end{array}
      
      Derivation
      1. Split input into 2 regimes
      2. if re < -3.9000000000000002e220

        1. Initial program 28.4%

          \[0.5 \cdot \sqrt{2 \cdot \left(\sqrt{re \cdot re + im \cdot im} - re\right)} \]
        2. Taylor expanded in re around -inf

          \[\leadsto 0.5 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{-4 \cdot re}} \]
        3. Step-by-step derivation
          1. lower-*.f6413.6%

            \[\leadsto 0.5 \cdot \sqrt{-4 \cdot \color{blue}{re}} \]
        4. Applied rewrites13.6%

          \[\leadsto 0.5 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{-4 \cdot re}} \]

        if -3.9000000000000002e220 < re

        1. Initial program 28.4%

          \[0.5 \cdot \sqrt{2 \cdot \left(\sqrt{re \cdot re + im \cdot im} - re\right)} \]
        2. Taylor expanded in im around inf

          \[\leadsto 0.5 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{im \cdot \left(2 + -2 \cdot \frac{re}{im}\right)}} \]
        3. Step-by-step derivation
          1. lower-*.f64N/A

            \[\leadsto \frac{1}{2} \cdot \sqrt{im \cdot \color{blue}{\left(2 + -2 \cdot \frac{re}{im}\right)}} \]
          2. lower-+.f64N/A

            \[\leadsto \frac{1}{2} \cdot \sqrt{im \cdot \left(2 + \color{blue}{-2 \cdot \frac{re}{im}}\right)} \]
          3. lower-*.f64N/A

            \[\leadsto \frac{1}{2} \cdot \sqrt{im \cdot \left(2 + -2 \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{re}{im}}\right)} \]
          4. lower-/.f6427.9%

            \[\leadsto 0.5 \cdot \sqrt{im \cdot \left(2 + -2 \cdot \frac{re}{\color{blue}{im}}\right)} \]
        4. Applied rewrites27.9%

          \[\leadsto 0.5 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{im \cdot \left(2 + -2 \cdot \frac{re}{im}\right)}} \]
        5. Taylor expanded in re around 0

          \[\leadsto 0.5 \cdot \sqrt{im \cdot 2} \]
        6. Step-by-step derivation
          1. Applied rewrites26.9%

            \[\leadsto 0.5 \cdot \sqrt{im \cdot 2} \]
          2. Taylor expanded in undef-var around zero

            \[\leadsto \color{blue}{0} \cdot \sqrt{im \cdot 2} \]
          3. Step-by-step derivation
            1. Applied rewrites3.3%

              \[\leadsto \color{blue}{0} \cdot \sqrt{im \cdot 2} \]
          4. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
          5. Add Preprocessing

          Alternative 3: 39.2% accurate, 1.3× speedup?

          \[\begin{array}{l} t_0 := \sqrt{-4 \cdot re}\\ \mathbf{if}\;re \leq -3.9 \cdot 10^{+220}:\\ \;\;\;\;0.5 \cdot t\_0\\ \mathbf{elif}\;re \leq -1.3 \cdot 10^{-298}:\\ \;\;\;\;0 \cdot t\_0\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;0.5 \cdot \sqrt{2 \cdot \left|im\right|}\\ \end{array} \]
          (FPCore (re im)
            :precision binary64
            (let* ((t_0 (sqrt (* -4.0 re))))
            (if (<= re -3.9e+220)
              (* 0.5 t_0)
              (if (<= re -1.3e-298)
                (* 0.0 t_0)
                (* 0.5 (sqrt (* 2.0 (fabs im))))))))
          double code(double re, double im) {
          	double t_0 = sqrt((-4.0 * re));
          	double tmp;
          	if (re <= -3.9e+220) {
          		tmp = 0.5 * t_0;
          	} else if (re <= -1.3e-298) {
          		tmp = 0.0 * t_0;
          	} else {
          		tmp = 0.5 * sqrt((2.0 * fabs(im)));
          	}
          	return tmp;
          }
          
          real(8) function code(re, im)
          use fmin_fmax_functions
              real(8), intent (in) :: re
              real(8), intent (in) :: im
              real(8) :: t_0
              real(8) :: tmp
              t_0 = sqrt(((-4.0d0) * re))
              if (re <= (-3.9d+220)) then
                  tmp = 0.5d0 * t_0
              else if (re <= (-1.3d-298)) then
                  tmp = 0.0d0 * t_0
              else
                  tmp = 0.5d0 * sqrt((2.0d0 * abs(im)))
              end if
              code = tmp
          end function
          
          public static double code(double re, double im) {
          	double t_0 = Math.sqrt((-4.0 * re));
          	double tmp;
          	if (re <= -3.9e+220) {
          		tmp = 0.5 * t_0;
          	} else if (re <= -1.3e-298) {
          		tmp = 0.0 * t_0;
          	} else {
          		tmp = 0.5 * Math.sqrt((2.0 * Math.abs(im)));
          	}
          	return tmp;
          }
          
          def code(re, im):
          	t_0 = math.sqrt((-4.0 * re))
          	tmp = 0
          	if re <= -3.9e+220:
          		tmp = 0.5 * t_0
          	elif re <= -1.3e-298:
          		tmp = 0.0 * t_0
          	else:
          		tmp = 0.5 * math.sqrt((2.0 * math.fabs(im)))
          	return tmp
          
          function code(re, im)
          	t_0 = sqrt(Float64(-4.0 * re))
          	tmp = 0.0
          	if (re <= -3.9e+220)
          		tmp = Float64(0.5 * t_0);
          	elseif (re <= -1.3e-298)
          		tmp = Float64(0.0 * t_0);
          	else
          		tmp = Float64(0.5 * sqrt(Float64(2.0 * abs(im))));
          	end
          	return tmp
          end
          
          function tmp_2 = code(re, im)
          	t_0 = sqrt((-4.0 * re));
          	tmp = 0.0;
          	if (re <= -3.9e+220)
          		tmp = 0.5 * t_0;
          	elseif (re <= -1.3e-298)
          		tmp = 0.0 * t_0;
          	else
          		tmp = 0.5 * sqrt((2.0 * abs(im)));
          	end
          	tmp_2 = tmp;
          end
          
          code[re_, im_] := Block[{t$95$0 = N[Sqrt[N[(-4.0 * re), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[re, -3.9e+220], N[(0.5 * t$95$0), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[re, -1.3e-298], N[(0.0 * t$95$0), $MachinePrecision], N[(0.5 * N[Sqrt[N[(2.0 * N[Abs[im], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]]]
          
          \begin{array}{l}
          t_0 := \sqrt{-4 \cdot re}\\
          \mathbf{if}\;re \leq -3.9 \cdot 10^{+220}:\\
          \;\;\;\;0.5 \cdot t\_0\\
          
          \mathbf{elif}\;re \leq -1.3 \cdot 10^{-298}:\\
          \;\;\;\;0 \cdot t\_0\\
          
          \mathbf{else}:\\
          \;\;\;\;0.5 \cdot \sqrt{2 \cdot \left|im\right|}\\
          
          
          \end{array}
          
          Derivation
          1. Split input into 3 regimes
          2. if re < -3.9000000000000002e220

            1. Initial program 28.4%

              \[0.5 \cdot \sqrt{2 \cdot \left(\sqrt{re \cdot re + im \cdot im} - re\right)} \]
            2. Taylor expanded in re around -inf

              \[\leadsto 0.5 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{-4 \cdot re}} \]
            3. Step-by-step derivation
              1. lower-*.f6413.6%

                \[\leadsto 0.5 \cdot \sqrt{-4 \cdot \color{blue}{re}} \]
            4. Applied rewrites13.6%

              \[\leadsto 0.5 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{-4 \cdot re}} \]

            if -3.9000000000000002e220 < re < -1.2999999999999999e-298

            1. Initial program 28.4%

              \[0.5 \cdot \sqrt{2 \cdot \left(\sqrt{re \cdot re + im \cdot im} - re\right)} \]
            2. Taylor expanded in re around -inf

              \[\leadsto 0.5 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{-4 \cdot re}} \]
            3. Step-by-step derivation
              1. lower-*.f6413.6%

                \[\leadsto 0.5 \cdot \sqrt{-4 \cdot \color{blue}{re}} \]
            4. Applied rewrites13.6%

              \[\leadsto 0.5 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{-4 \cdot re}} \]
            5. Taylor expanded in undef-var around zero

              \[\leadsto \color{blue}{0} \cdot \sqrt{-4 \cdot re} \]
            6. Step-by-step derivation
              1. Applied rewrites25.3%

                \[\leadsto \color{blue}{0} \cdot \sqrt{-4 \cdot re} \]

              if -1.2999999999999999e-298 < re

              1. Initial program 28.4%

                \[0.5 \cdot \sqrt{2 \cdot \left(\sqrt{re \cdot re + im \cdot im} - re\right)} \]
              2. Taylor expanded in re around inf

                \[\leadsto 0.5 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{\frac{{im}^{2}}{re}}} \]
              3. Step-by-step derivation
                1. lower-/.f64N/A

                  \[\leadsto \frac{1}{2} \cdot \sqrt{\frac{{im}^{2}}{\color{blue}{re}}} \]
                2. lower-pow.f6423.0%

                  \[\leadsto 0.5 \cdot \sqrt{\frac{{im}^{2}}{re}} \]
              4. Applied rewrites23.0%

                \[\leadsto 0.5 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{\frac{{im}^{2}}{re}}} \]
              5. Taylor expanded in im around inf

                \[\leadsto 0.5 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{2 \cdot im}} \]
              6. Step-by-step derivation
                1. lower-*.f6426.9%

                  \[\leadsto 0.5 \cdot \sqrt{2 \cdot \color{blue}{im}} \]
              7. Applied rewrites26.9%

                \[\leadsto 0.5 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{2 \cdot im}} \]
            7. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.
            8. Add Preprocessing

            Alternative 4: 33.9% accurate, 1.6× speedup?

            \[\begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;re \leq -2.2 \cdot 10^{+62}:\\ \;\;\;\;0.5 \cdot \sqrt{-4 \cdot re}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;0.5 \cdot \sqrt{2 \cdot \left|im\right|}\\ \end{array} \]
            (FPCore (re im)
              :precision binary64
              (if (<= re -2.2e+62)
              (* 0.5 (sqrt (* -4.0 re)))
              (* 0.5 (sqrt (* 2.0 (fabs im))))))
            double code(double re, double im) {
            	double tmp;
            	if (re <= -2.2e+62) {
            		tmp = 0.5 * sqrt((-4.0 * re));
            	} else {
            		tmp = 0.5 * sqrt((2.0 * fabs(im)));
            	}
            	return tmp;
            }
            
            real(8) function code(re, im)
            use fmin_fmax_functions
                real(8), intent (in) :: re
                real(8), intent (in) :: im
                real(8) :: tmp
                if (re <= (-2.2d+62)) then
                    tmp = 0.5d0 * sqrt(((-4.0d0) * re))
                else
                    tmp = 0.5d0 * sqrt((2.0d0 * abs(im)))
                end if
                code = tmp
            end function
            
            public static double code(double re, double im) {
            	double tmp;
            	if (re <= -2.2e+62) {
            		tmp = 0.5 * Math.sqrt((-4.0 * re));
            	} else {
            		tmp = 0.5 * Math.sqrt((2.0 * Math.abs(im)));
            	}
            	return tmp;
            }
            
            def code(re, im):
            	tmp = 0
            	if re <= -2.2e+62:
            		tmp = 0.5 * math.sqrt((-4.0 * re))
            	else:
            		tmp = 0.5 * math.sqrt((2.0 * math.fabs(im)))
            	return tmp
            
            function code(re, im)
            	tmp = 0.0
            	if (re <= -2.2e+62)
            		tmp = Float64(0.5 * sqrt(Float64(-4.0 * re)));
            	else
            		tmp = Float64(0.5 * sqrt(Float64(2.0 * abs(im))));
            	end
            	return tmp
            end
            
            function tmp_2 = code(re, im)
            	tmp = 0.0;
            	if (re <= -2.2e+62)
            		tmp = 0.5 * sqrt((-4.0 * re));
            	else
            		tmp = 0.5 * sqrt((2.0 * abs(im)));
            	end
            	tmp_2 = tmp;
            end
            
            code[re_, im_] := If[LessEqual[re, -2.2e+62], N[(0.5 * N[Sqrt[N[(-4.0 * re), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(0.5 * N[Sqrt[N[(2.0 * N[Abs[im], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]
            
            \begin{array}{l}
            \mathbf{if}\;re \leq -2.2 \cdot 10^{+62}:\\
            \;\;\;\;0.5 \cdot \sqrt{-4 \cdot re}\\
            
            \mathbf{else}:\\
            \;\;\;\;0.5 \cdot \sqrt{2 \cdot \left|im\right|}\\
            
            
            \end{array}
            
            Derivation
            1. Split input into 2 regimes
            2. if re < -2.2000000000000001e62

              1. Initial program 28.4%

                \[0.5 \cdot \sqrt{2 \cdot \left(\sqrt{re \cdot re + im \cdot im} - re\right)} \]
              2. Taylor expanded in re around -inf

                \[\leadsto 0.5 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{-4 \cdot re}} \]
              3. Step-by-step derivation
                1. lower-*.f6413.6%

                  \[\leadsto 0.5 \cdot \sqrt{-4 \cdot \color{blue}{re}} \]
              4. Applied rewrites13.6%

                \[\leadsto 0.5 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{-4 \cdot re}} \]

              if -2.2000000000000001e62 < re

              1. Initial program 28.4%

                \[0.5 \cdot \sqrt{2 \cdot \left(\sqrt{re \cdot re + im \cdot im} - re\right)} \]
              2. Taylor expanded in re around inf

                \[\leadsto 0.5 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{\frac{{im}^{2}}{re}}} \]
              3. Step-by-step derivation
                1. lower-/.f64N/A

                  \[\leadsto \frac{1}{2} \cdot \sqrt{\frac{{im}^{2}}{\color{blue}{re}}} \]
                2. lower-pow.f6423.0%

                  \[\leadsto 0.5 \cdot \sqrt{\frac{{im}^{2}}{re}} \]
              4. Applied rewrites23.0%

                \[\leadsto 0.5 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{\frac{{im}^{2}}{re}}} \]
              5. Taylor expanded in im around inf

                \[\leadsto 0.5 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{2 \cdot im}} \]
              6. Step-by-step derivation
                1. lower-*.f6426.9%

                  \[\leadsto 0.5 \cdot \sqrt{2 \cdot \color{blue}{im}} \]
              7. Applied rewrites26.9%

                \[\leadsto 0.5 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{2 \cdot im}} \]
            3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
            4. Add Preprocessing

            Alternative 5: 13.6% accurate, 2.5× speedup?

            \[0.5 \cdot \sqrt{-4 \cdot re} \]
            (FPCore (re im)
              :precision binary64
              (* 0.5 (sqrt (* -4.0 re))))
            double code(double re, double im) {
            	return 0.5 * sqrt((-4.0 * re));
            }
            
            real(8) function code(re, im)
            use fmin_fmax_functions
                real(8), intent (in) :: re
                real(8), intent (in) :: im
                code = 0.5d0 * sqrt(((-4.0d0) * re))
            end function
            
            public static double code(double re, double im) {
            	return 0.5 * Math.sqrt((-4.0 * re));
            }
            
            def code(re, im):
            	return 0.5 * math.sqrt((-4.0 * re))
            
            function code(re, im)
            	return Float64(0.5 * sqrt(Float64(-4.0 * re)))
            end
            
            function tmp = code(re, im)
            	tmp = 0.5 * sqrt((-4.0 * re));
            end
            
            code[re_, im_] := N[(0.5 * N[Sqrt[N[(-4.0 * re), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]
            
            0.5 \cdot \sqrt{-4 \cdot re}
            
            Derivation
            1. Initial program 28.4%

              \[0.5 \cdot \sqrt{2 \cdot \left(\sqrt{re \cdot re + im \cdot im} - re\right)} \]
            2. Taylor expanded in re around -inf

              \[\leadsto 0.5 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{-4 \cdot re}} \]
            3. Step-by-step derivation
              1. lower-*.f6413.6%

                \[\leadsto 0.5 \cdot \sqrt{-4 \cdot \color{blue}{re}} \]
            4. Applied rewrites13.6%

              \[\leadsto 0.5 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{-4 \cdot re}} \]
            5. Add Preprocessing

            Reproduce

            ?
            herbie shell --seed 2025313 -o setup:search
            (FPCore (re im)
              :name "math.sqrt on complex, imaginary part, im greater than 0 branch"
              :precision binary64
              :pre (> im 0.0)
              (* 0.5 (sqrt (* 2.0 (- (sqrt (+ (* re re) (* im im))) re)))))