Linear.V4:$cdot from linear-1.19.1.3, C

Percentage Accurate: 95.9% → 98.1%

Time: 3.2s

Alternatives: 13

Speedup: 1.1×

• 41.6% of points produce a very large (infinite) output. You may want to add a precondition.

Specification

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
 :precision binary64
 (+ (+ (+ (* x y) (* z t)) (* a b)) (* c i)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	return (((x * y) + (z * t)) + (a * b)) + (c * i);
}

Fortran

module fmin_fmax_functions
    implicit none
    private
    public fmax
    public fmin

    interface fmax
        module procedure fmax88
        module procedure fmax44
        module procedure fmax84
        module procedure fmax48
    end interface
    interface fmin
        module procedure fmin88
        module procedure fmin44
        module procedure fmin84
        module procedure fmin48
    end interface
contains
    real(8) function fmax88(x, y) result (res)
        real(8), intent (in) :: x
        real(8), intent (in) :: y
        res = merge(y, merge(x, max(x, y), y /= y), x /= x)
    end function
    real(4) function fmax44(x, y) result (res)
        real(4), intent (in) :: x
        real(4), intent (in) :: y
        res = merge(y, merge(x, max(x, y), y /= y), x /= x)
    end function
    real(8) function fmax84(x, y) result(res)
        real(8), intent (in) :: x
        real(4), intent (in) :: y
        res = merge(dble(y), merge(x, max(x, dble(y)), y /= y), x /= x)
    end function
    real(8) function fmax48(x, y) result(res)
        real(4), intent (in) :: x
        real(8), intent (in) :: y
        res = merge(y, merge(dble(x), max(dble(x), y), y /= y), x /= x)
    end function
    real(8) function fmin88(x, y) result (res)
        real(8), intent (in) :: x
        real(8), intent (in) :: y
        res = merge(y, merge(x, min(x, y), y /= y), x /= x)
    end function
    real(4) function fmin44(x, y) result (res)
        real(4), intent (in) :: x
        real(4), intent (in) :: y
        res = merge(y, merge(x, min(x, y), y /= y), x /= x)
    end function
    real(8) function fmin84(x, y) result(res)
        real(8), intent (in) :: x
        real(4), intent (in) :: y
        res = merge(dble(y), merge(x, min(x, dble(y)), y /= y), x /= x)
    end function
    real(8) function fmin48(x, y) result(res)
        real(4), intent (in) :: x
        real(8), intent (in) :: y
        res = merge(y, merge(dble(x), min(dble(x), y), y /= y), x /= x)
    end function
end module

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
use fmin_fmax_functions
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: c
    real(8), intent (in) :: i
    code = (((x * y) + (z * t)) + (a * b)) + (c * i)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	return (((x * y) + (z * t)) + (a * b)) + (c * i);
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i):
	return (((x * y) + (z * t)) + (a * b)) + (c * i)

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(x * y) + Float64(z * t)) + Float64(a * b)) + Float64(c * i))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = (((x * y) + (z * t)) + (a * b)) + (c * i);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := N[(N[(N[(N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(c * i), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Initial Program: 95.9% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
 :precision binary64
 (+ (+ (+ (* x y) (* z t)) (* a b)) (* c i)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	return (((x * y) + (z * t)) + (a * b)) + (c * i);
}

Fortran

module fmin_fmax_functions
    implicit none
    private
    public fmax
    public fmin

    interface fmax
        module procedure fmax88
        module procedure fmax44
        module procedure fmax84
        module procedure fmax48
    end interface
    interface fmin
        module procedure fmin88
        module procedure fmin44
        module procedure fmin84
        module procedure fmin48
    end interface
contains
    real(8) function fmax88(x, y) result (res)
        real(8), intent (in) :: x
        real(8), intent (in) :: y
        res = merge(y, merge(x, max(x, y), y /= y), x /= x)
    end function
    real(4) function fmax44(x, y) result (res)
        real(4), intent (in) :: x
        real(4), intent (in) :: y
        res = merge(y, merge(x, max(x, y), y /= y), x /= x)
    end function
    real(8) function fmax84(x, y) result(res)
        real(8), intent (in) :: x
        real(4), intent (in) :: y
        res = merge(dble(y), merge(x, max(x, dble(y)), y /= y), x /= x)
    end function
    real(8) function fmax48(x, y) result(res)
        real(4), intent (in) :: x
        real(8), intent (in) :: y
        res = merge(y, merge(dble(x), max(dble(x), y), y /= y), x /= x)
    end function
    real(8) function fmin88(x, y) result (res)
        real(8), intent (in) :: x
        real(8), intent (in) :: y
        res = merge(y, merge(x, min(x, y), y /= y), x /= x)
    end function
    real(4) function fmin44(x, y) result (res)
        real(4), intent (in) :: x
        real(4), intent (in) :: y
        res = merge(y, merge(x, min(x, y), y /= y), x /= x)
    end function
    real(8) function fmin84(x, y) result(res)
        real(8), intent (in) :: x
        real(4), intent (in) :: y
        res = merge(dble(y), merge(x, min(x, dble(y)), y /= y), x /= x)
    end function
    real(8) function fmin48(x, y) result(res)
        real(4), intent (in) :: x
        real(8), intent (in) :: y
        res = merge(y, merge(dble(x), min(dble(x), y), y /= y), x /= x)
    end function
end module

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
use fmin_fmax_functions
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: c
    real(8), intent (in) :: i
    code = (((x * y) + (z * t)) + (a * b)) + (c * i)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	return (((x * y) + (z * t)) + (a * b)) + (c * i);
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i):
	return (((x * y) + (z * t)) + (a * b)) + (c * i)

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(x * y) + Float64(z * t)) + Float64(a * b)) + Float64(c * i))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = (((x * y) + (z * t)) + (a * b)) + (c * i);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := N[(N[(N[(N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(c * i), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Alternative 1: 98.1% accurate, 1.1× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \mathsf{fma}\left(y, x, \mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, \mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, t \cdot z\right)\right)\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
 :precision binary64
 (fma y x (fma i c (fma b a (* t z)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	return fma(y, x, fma(i, c, fma(b, a, (t * z))));
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	return fma(y, x, fma(i, c, fma(b, a, Float64(t * z))))
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := N[(y * x + N[(i * c + N[(b * a + N[(t * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 95.9%

   \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. lift-+.f64 N/A

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i} \]

   2. lift-*.f64 N/A

      \[\leadsto \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + \color{blue}{c \cdot i} \]

   3. fp-cancel-sign-sub-inv N/A

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) - \left(\mathsf{neg}\left(c\right)\right) \cdot i} \]

   4. lift-+.f64 N/A

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} - \left(\mathsf{neg}\left(c\right)\right) \cdot i \]

   5. lift-+.f64 N/A

      \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)} + a \cdot b\right) - \left(\mathsf{neg}\left(c\right)\right) \cdot i \]

   6. associate-+l+ N/A

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot y + \left(z \cdot t + a \cdot b\right)\right)} - \left(\mathsf{neg}\left(c\right)\right) \cdot i \]

   7. associate--l+ N/A

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot y + \left(\left(z \cdot t + a \cdot b\right) - \left(\mathsf{neg}\left(c\right)\right) \cdot i\right)} \]

   8. lift-*.f64 N/A

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot y} + \left(\left(z \cdot t + a \cdot b\right) - \left(\mathsf{neg}\left(c\right)\right) \cdot i\right) \]

   9. *-commutative N/A

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot x} + \left(\left(z \cdot t + a \cdot b\right) - \left(\mathsf{neg}\left(c\right)\right) \cdot i\right) \]

   10. lower-fma.f64 N/A

       \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, x, \left(z \cdot t + a \cdot b\right) - \left(\mathsf{neg}\left(c\right)\right) \cdot i\right)} \]

   11. fp-cancel-sign-sub-inv N/A

       \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, x, \color{blue}{\left(z \cdot t + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i}\right) \]

   12. lift-*.f64 N/A

       \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, x, \left(z \cdot t + a \cdot b\right) + \color{blue}{c \cdot i}\right) \]

   13. +-commutative N/A

       \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, x, \color{blue}{c \cdot i + \left(z \cdot t + a \cdot b\right)}\right) \]

   14. lift-*.f64 N/A

       \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, x, \color{blue}{c \cdot i} + \left(z \cdot t + a \cdot b\right)\right) \]

   15. *-commutative N/A

       \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, x, \color{blue}{i \cdot c} + \left(z \cdot t + a \cdot b\right)\right) \]

   16. lower-fma.f64 N/A

       \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, x, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, z \cdot t + a \cdot b\right)}\right) \]

   17. +-commutative N/A

       \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, x, \mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, \color{blue}{a \cdot b + z \cdot t}\right)\right) \]

   18. lift-*.f64 N/A

       \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, x, \mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, \color{blue}{a \cdot b} + z \cdot t\right)\right) \]

   19. *-commutative N/A

       \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, x, \mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, \color{blue}{b \cdot a} + z \cdot t\right)\right) \]

   20. lower-fma.f64 98.1

       \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, x, \mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, z \cdot t\right)}\right)\right) \]

3. Applied rewrites 98.1%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, x, \mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, \mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, t \cdot z\right)\right)\right)} \]
4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 2: 89.8% accurate, 0.8× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;a \cdot b \leq -2 \cdot 10^{+78}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, t \cdot z\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;a \cdot b \leq 10^{+127}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(y, x, \mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, t \cdot z\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(z, t, \mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, a \cdot b\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= (* a b) -2e+78)
   (fma a b (fma c i (* t z)))
   (if (<= (* a b) 1e+127)
     (fma y x (fma i c (* t z)))
     (fma z t (fma i c (* a b))))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double tmp;
	if ((a * b) <= -2e+78) {
		tmp = fma(a, b, fma(c, i, (t * z)));
	} else if ((a * b) <= 1e+127) {
		tmp = fma(y, x, fma(i, c, (t * z)));
	} else {
		tmp = fma(z, t, fma(i, c, (a * b)));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (Float64(a * b) <= -2e+78)
		tmp = fma(a, b, fma(c, i, Float64(t * z)));
	elseif (Float64(a * b) <= 1e+127)
		tmp = fma(y, x, fma(i, c, Float64(t * z)));
	else
		tmp = fma(z, t, fma(i, c, Float64(a * b)));
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := If[LessEqual[N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision], -2e+78], N[(a * b + N[(c * i + N[(t * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision], 1e+127], N[(y * x + N[(i * c + N[(t * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(z * t + N[(i * c + N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if (*.f64 a b) < -2.00000000000000002e78

   1. Initial program 95.9%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]

   2. Taylor expanded in x around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(c \cdot i + t \cdot z\right)} \]
   3. Step-by-step derivation

      1. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(a, \color{blue}{b}, c \cdot i + t \cdot z\right) \]

      2. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, t \cdot z\right)\right) \]

      3. lower-*.f64 74.7

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, t \cdot z\right)\right) \]

   4. Applied rewrites 74.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, t \cdot z\right)\right)} \]

   if -2.00000000000000002e78 < (*.f64 a b) < 9.99999999999999955e126

   1. Initial program 95.9%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]

   2. Taylor expanded in a around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c \cdot i + \left(t \cdot z + x \cdot y\right)} \]
   3. Step-by-step derivation

      1. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, \color{blue}{i}, t \cdot z + x \cdot y\right) \]

      2. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(t, z, x \cdot y\right)\right) \]

      3. lower-*.f64 75.1

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(t, z, x \cdot y\right)\right) \]

   4. Applied rewrites 75.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(t, z, x \cdot y\right)\right)} \]
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. lift-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto c \cdot i + \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(t, z, x \cdot y\right)} \]

      2. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(t, z, x \cdot y\right) + \color{blue}{c \cdot i} \]

      3. lift-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \left(t \cdot z + x \cdot y\right) + \color{blue}{c} \cdot i \]

      4. lift-*.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \left(t \cdot z + x \cdot y\right) + c \cdot i \]

      5. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \left(x \cdot y + t \cdot z\right) + \color{blue}{c} \cdot i \]

      6. associate-+l+ N/A

         \[\leadsto x \cdot y + \color{blue}{\left(t \cdot z + c \cdot i\right)} \]

      7. lift-*.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto x \cdot y + \left(\color{blue}{t \cdot z} + c \cdot i\right) \]

      8. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto y \cdot x + \left(\color{blue}{t \cdot z} + c \cdot i\right) \]

      9. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto y \cdot x + \left(c \cdot i + \color{blue}{t \cdot z}\right) \]

      10. lift-fma.f64 N/A

          \[\leadsto y \cdot x + \mathsf{fma}\left(c, \color{blue}{i}, t \cdot z\right) \]

      11. lower-fma.f64 75.2

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \color{blue}{x}, \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, t \cdot z\right)\right) \]

      12. lift-fma.f64 N/A

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, x, c \cdot i + t \cdot z\right) \]

      13. *-commutative N/A

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, x, i \cdot c + t \cdot z\right) \]

      14. lower-fma.f64 75.2

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, x, \mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, t \cdot z\right)\right) \]

   6. Applied rewrites 75.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, x, \mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, t \cdot z\right)\right)} \]

   if 9.99999999999999955e126 < (*.f64 a b)

   1. Initial program 95.9%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. lift-+.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i} \]

      2. lift-+.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} + c \cdot i \]

      3. associate-+l+ N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + \left(a \cdot b + c \cdot i\right)} \]

      4. lift-+.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)} + \left(a \cdot b + c \cdot i\right) \]

      5. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(z \cdot t + x \cdot y\right)} + \left(a \cdot b + c \cdot i\right) \]

      6. associate-+l+ N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot t + \left(x \cdot y + \left(a \cdot b + c \cdot i\right)\right)} \]

      7. lift-*.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot t} + \left(x \cdot y + \left(a \cdot b + c \cdot i\right)\right) \]

      8. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, t, x \cdot y + \left(a \cdot b + c \cdot i\right)\right)} \]

      9. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z, t, \color{blue}{\left(a \cdot b + c \cdot i\right) + x \cdot y}\right) \]

      10. +-commutative N/A

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z, t, \color{blue}{\left(c \cdot i + a \cdot b\right)} + x \cdot y\right) \]

      11. associate-+l+ N/A

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z, t, \color{blue}{c \cdot i + \left(a \cdot b + x \cdot y\right)}\right) \]

      12. lift-*.f64 N/A

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z, t, \color{blue}{c \cdot i} + \left(a \cdot b + x \cdot y\right)\right) \]

      13. *-commutative N/A

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z, t, \color{blue}{i \cdot c} + \left(a \cdot b + x \cdot y\right)\right) \]

      14. lower-fma.f64 N/A

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z, t, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, a \cdot b + x \cdot y\right)}\right) \]

      15. add-flip N/A

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z, t, \mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, \color{blue}{a \cdot b - \left(\mathsf{neg}\left(x \cdot y\right)\right)}\right)\right) \]

      16. sub-flip N/A

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z, t, \mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(\mathsf{neg}\left(\left(\mathsf{neg}\left(x \cdot y\right)\right)\right)\right)}\right)\right) \]

      17. lift-*.f64 N/A

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z, t, \mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, \color{blue}{a \cdot b} + \left(\mathsf{neg}\left(\left(\mathsf{neg}\left(x \cdot y\right)\right)\right)\right)\right)\right) \]

      18. *-commutative N/A

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z, t, \mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, \color{blue}{b \cdot a} + \left(\mathsf{neg}\left(\left(\mathsf{neg}\left(x \cdot y\right)\right)\right)\right)\right)\right) \]

      19. remove-double-neg N/A

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z, t, \mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, b \cdot a + \color{blue}{x \cdot y}\right)\right) \]

      20. lower-fma.f64 98.2

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z, t, \mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, x \cdot y\right)}\right)\right) \]

      21. lift-*.f64 N/A

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z, t, \mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, \mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \color{blue}{x \cdot y}\right)\right)\right) \]

      22. *-commutative N/A

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z, t, \mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, \mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \color{blue}{y \cdot x}\right)\right)\right) \]

      23. lower-*.f64 98.2

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z, t, \mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, \mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \color{blue}{y \cdot x}\right)\right)\right) \]

   3. Applied rewrites 98.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, t, \mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, \mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, y \cdot x\right)\right)\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in x around 0

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z, t, \mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, \color{blue}{a \cdot b}\right)\right) \]
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. lower-*.f64 75.3

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z, t, \mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, a \cdot \color{blue}{b}\right)\right) \]

   6. Applied rewrites 75.3%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z, t, \mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, \color{blue}{a \cdot b}\right)\right) \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.
4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 3: 89.6% accurate, 0.8× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_1 := \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, t \cdot z\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{if}\;a \cdot b \leq -2 \cdot 10^{+78}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_1\\ \mathbf{elif}\;a \cdot b \leq 10^{+127}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(y, x, \mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, t \cdot z\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_1\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_1 (fma a b (fma c i (* t z)))))
   (if (<= (* a b) -2e+78)
     t_1
     (if (<= (* a b) 1e+127) (fma y x (fma i c (* t z))) t_1))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double t_1 = fma(a, b, fma(c, i, (t * z)));
	double tmp;
	if ((a * b) <= -2e+78) {
		tmp = t_1;
	} else if ((a * b) <= 1e+127) {
		tmp = fma(y, x, fma(i, c, (t * z)));
	} else {
		tmp = t_1;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	t_1 = fma(a, b, fma(c, i, Float64(t * z)))
	tmp = 0.0
	if (Float64(a * b) <= -2e+78)
		tmp = t_1;
	elseif (Float64(a * b) <= 1e+127)
		tmp = fma(y, x, fma(i, c, Float64(t * z)));
	else
		tmp = t_1;
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := Block[{t$95$1 = N[(a * b + N[(c * i + N[(t * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision], -2e+78], t$95$1, If[LessEqual[N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision], 1e+127], N[(y * x + N[(i * c + N[(t * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], t$95$1]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (*.f64 a b) < -2.00000000000000002e78 or 9.99999999999999955e126 < (*.f64 a b)

   1. Initial program 95.9%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]

   2. Taylor expanded in x around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(c \cdot i + t \cdot z\right)} \]
   3. Step-by-step derivation

      1. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(a, \color{blue}{b}, c \cdot i + t \cdot z\right) \]

      2. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, t \cdot z\right)\right) \]

      3. lower-*.f64 74.7

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, t \cdot z\right)\right) \]

   4. Applied rewrites 74.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, t \cdot z\right)\right)} \]

   if -2.00000000000000002e78 < (*.f64 a b) < 9.99999999999999955e126

   1. Initial program 95.9%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]

   2. Taylor expanded in a around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c \cdot i + \left(t \cdot z + x \cdot y\right)} \]
   3. Step-by-step derivation

      1. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, \color{blue}{i}, t \cdot z + x \cdot y\right) \]

      2. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(t, z, x \cdot y\right)\right) \]

      3. lower-*.f64 75.1

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(t, z, x \cdot y\right)\right) \]

   4. Applied rewrites 75.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(t, z, x \cdot y\right)\right)} \]
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. lift-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto c \cdot i + \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(t, z, x \cdot y\right)} \]

      2. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(t, z, x \cdot y\right) + \color{blue}{c \cdot i} \]

      3. lift-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \left(t \cdot z + x \cdot y\right) + \color{blue}{c} \cdot i \]

      4. lift-*.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \left(t \cdot z + x \cdot y\right) + c \cdot i \]

      5. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \left(x \cdot y + t \cdot z\right) + \color{blue}{c} \cdot i \]

      6. associate-+l+ N/A

         \[\leadsto x \cdot y + \color{blue}{\left(t \cdot z + c \cdot i\right)} \]

      7. lift-*.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto x \cdot y + \left(\color{blue}{t \cdot z} + c \cdot i\right) \]

      8. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto y \cdot x + \left(\color{blue}{t \cdot z} + c \cdot i\right) \]

      9. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto y \cdot x + \left(c \cdot i + \color{blue}{t \cdot z}\right) \]

      10. lift-fma.f64 N/A

          \[\leadsto y \cdot x + \mathsf{fma}\left(c, \color{blue}{i}, t \cdot z\right) \]

      11. lower-fma.f64 75.2

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \color{blue}{x}, \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, t \cdot z\right)\right) \]

      12. lift-fma.f64 N/A

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, x, c \cdot i + t \cdot z\right) \]

      13. *-commutative N/A

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, x, i \cdot c + t \cdot z\right) \]

      14. lower-fma.f64 75.2

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, x, \mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, t \cdot z\right)\right) \]

   6. Applied rewrites 75.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, x, \mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, t \cdot z\right)\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 4: 89.6% accurate, 0.8× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_1 := \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, t \cdot z\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{if}\;a \cdot b \leq -2 \cdot 10^{+78}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_1\\ \mathbf{elif}\;a \cdot b \leq 10^{+127}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(t, z, x \cdot y\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_1\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_1 (fma a b (fma c i (* t z)))))
   (if (<= (* a b) -2e+78)
     t_1
     (if (<= (* a b) 1e+127) (fma c i (fma t z (* x y))) t_1))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double t_1 = fma(a, b, fma(c, i, (t * z)));
	double tmp;
	if ((a * b) <= -2e+78) {
		tmp = t_1;
	} else if ((a * b) <= 1e+127) {
		tmp = fma(c, i, fma(t, z, (x * y)));
	} else {
		tmp = t_1;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	t_1 = fma(a, b, fma(c, i, Float64(t * z)))
	tmp = 0.0
	if (Float64(a * b) <= -2e+78)
		tmp = t_1;
	elseif (Float64(a * b) <= 1e+127)
		tmp = fma(c, i, fma(t, z, Float64(x * y)));
	else
		tmp = t_1;
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := Block[{t$95$1 = N[(a * b + N[(c * i + N[(t * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision], -2e+78], t$95$1, If[LessEqual[N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision], 1e+127], N[(c * i + N[(t * z + N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], t$95$1]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (*.f64 a b) < -2.00000000000000002e78 or 9.99999999999999955e126 < (*.f64 a b)

   1. Initial program 95.9%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]

   2. Taylor expanded in x around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(c \cdot i + t \cdot z\right)} \]
   3. Step-by-step derivation

      1. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(a, \color{blue}{b}, c \cdot i + t \cdot z\right) \]

      2. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, t \cdot z\right)\right) \]

      3. lower-*.f64 74.7

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, t \cdot z\right)\right) \]

   4. Applied rewrites 74.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, t \cdot z\right)\right)} \]

   if -2.00000000000000002e78 < (*.f64 a b) < 9.99999999999999955e126

   1. Initial program 95.9%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]

   2. Taylor expanded in a around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c \cdot i + \left(t \cdot z + x \cdot y\right)} \]
   3. Step-by-step derivation

      1. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, \color{blue}{i}, t \cdot z + x \cdot y\right) \]

      2. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(t, z, x \cdot y\right)\right) \]

      3. lower-*.f64 75.1

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(t, z, x \cdot y\right)\right) \]

   4. Applied rewrites 75.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(t, z, x \cdot y\right)\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 5: 84.9% accurate, 0.8× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_1 := \mathsf{fma}\left(t, z, x \cdot y\right)\\ \mathbf{if}\;x \cdot y \leq -5 \cdot 10^{+144}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_1\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \cdot y \leq 5 \cdot 10^{+85}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, t \cdot z\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_1\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_1 (fma t z (* x y))))
   (if (<= (* x y) -5e+144)
     t_1
     (if (<= (* x y) 5e+85) (fma a b (fma c i (* t z))) t_1))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double t_1 = fma(t, z, (x * y));
	double tmp;
	if ((x * y) <= -5e+144) {
		tmp = t_1;
	} else if ((x * y) <= 5e+85) {
		tmp = fma(a, b, fma(c, i, (t * z)));
	} else {
		tmp = t_1;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	t_1 = fma(t, z, Float64(x * y))
	tmp = 0.0
	if (Float64(x * y) <= -5e+144)
		tmp = t_1;
	elseif (Float64(x * y) <= 5e+85)
		tmp = fma(a, b, fma(c, i, Float64(t * z)));
	else
		tmp = t_1;
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := Block[{t$95$1 = N[(t * z + N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision], -5e+144], t$95$1, If[LessEqual[N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision], 5e+85], N[(a * b + N[(c * i + N[(t * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], t$95$1]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (*.f64 x y) < -4.9999999999999999e144 or 5.0000000000000001e85 < (*.f64 x y)

   1. Initial program 95.9%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]

   2. Taylor expanded in a around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c \cdot i + \left(t \cdot z + x \cdot y\right)} \]
   3. Step-by-step derivation

      1. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, \color{blue}{i}, t \cdot z + x \cdot y\right) \]

      2. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(t, z, x \cdot y\right)\right) \]

      3. lower-*.f64 75.1

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(t, z, x \cdot y\right)\right) \]

   4. Applied rewrites 75.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(t, z, x \cdot y\right)\right)} \]

   5. Taylor expanded in z around 0

      \[\leadsto c \cdot i + \color{blue}{x \cdot y} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, x \cdot y\right) \]

      2. lower-*.f64 52.0

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, x \cdot y\right) \]

   7. Applied rewrites 52.0%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, \color{blue}{i}, x \cdot y\right) \]

   8. Taylor expanded in x around 0

      \[\leadsto c \cdot i \]
   9. Step-by-step derivation

      1. lower-*.f64 27.5

         \[\leadsto c \cdot i \]

   10. Applied rewrites 27.5%

       \[\leadsto c \cdot i \]

   11. Taylor expanded in c around 0

       \[\leadsto t \cdot z + \color{blue}{x \cdot y} \]
   12. Step-by-step derivation

       1. lower-fma.f64 N/A

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(t, z, x \cdot y\right) \]

       2. lower-*.f64 51.5

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(t, z, x \cdot y\right) \]

   13. Applied rewrites 51.5%

       \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(t, \color{blue}{z}, x \cdot y\right) \]

   if -4.9999999999999999e144 < (*.f64 x y) < 5.0000000000000001e85

   1. Initial program 95.9%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]

   2. Taylor expanded in x around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(c \cdot i + t \cdot z\right)} \]
   3. Step-by-step derivation

      1. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(a, \color{blue}{b}, c \cdot i + t \cdot z\right) \]

      2. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, t \cdot z\right)\right) \]

      3. lower-*.f64 74.7

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, t \cdot z\right)\right) \]

   4. Applied rewrites 74.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, t \cdot z\right)\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 6: 74.8% accurate, 0.6× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_1 := \mathsf{fma}\left(t, z, x \cdot y\right)\\ t_2 := x \cdot y + z \cdot t\\ \mathbf{if}\;t\_2 \leq -5 \cdot 10^{+194}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_1\\ \mathbf{elif}\;t\_2 \leq 2 \cdot 10^{+180}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, c \cdot i\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_1\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_1 (fma t z (* x y))) (t_2 (+ (* x y) (* z t))))
   (if (<= t_2 -5e+194) t_1 (if (<= t_2 2e+180) (fma a b (* c i)) t_1))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double t_1 = fma(t, z, (x * y));
	double t_2 = (x * y) + (z * t);
	double tmp;
	if (t_2 <= -5e+194) {
		tmp = t_1;
	} else if (t_2 <= 2e+180) {
		tmp = fma(a, b, (c * i));
	} else {
		tmp = t_1;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	t_1 = fma(t, z, Float64(x * y))
	t_2 = Float64(Float64(x * y) + Float64(z * t))
	tmp = 0.0
	if (t_2 <= -5e+194)
		tmp = t_1;
	elseif (t_2 <= 2e+180)
		tmp = fma(a, b, Float64(c * i));
	else
		tmp = t_1;
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := Block[{t$95$1 = N[(t * z + N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, Block[{t$95$2 = N[(N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[t$95$2, -5e+194], t$95$1, If[LessEqual[t$95$2, 2e+180], N[(a * b + N[(c * i), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], t$95$1]]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (+.f64 (*.f64 x y) (*.f64 z t)) < -4.99999999999999989e194 or 2e180 < (+.f64 (*.f64 x y) (*.f64 z t))

   1. Initial program 95.9%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]

   2. Taylor expanded in a around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c \cdot i + \left(t \cdot z + x \cdot y\right)} \]
   3. Step-by-step derivation

      1. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, \color{blue}{i}, t \cdot z + x \cdot y\right) \]

      2. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(t, z, x \cdot y\right)\right) \]

      3. lower-*.f64 75.1

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(t, z, x \cdot y\right)\right) \]

   4. Applied rewrites 75.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(t, z, x \cdot y\right)\right)} \]

   5. Taylor expanded in z around 0

      \[\leadsto c \cdot i + \color{blue}{x \cdot y} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, x \cdot y\right) \]

      2. lower-*.f64 52.0

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, x \cdot y\right) \]

   7. Applied rewrites 52.0%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, \color{blue}{i}, x \cdot y\right) \]

   8. Taylor expanded in x around 0

      \[\leadsto c \cdot i \]
   9. Step-by-step derivation

      1. lower-*.f64 27.5

         \[\leadsto c \cdot i \]

   10. Applied rewrites 27.5%

       \[\leadsto c \cdot i \]

   11. Taylor expanded in c around 0

       \[\leadsto t \cdot z + \color{blue}{x \cdot y} \]
   12. Step-by-step derivation

       1. lower-fma.f64 N/A

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(t, z, x \cdot y\right) \]

       2. lower-*.f64 51.5

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(t, z, x \cdot y\right) \]

   13. Applied rewrites 51.5%

       \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(t, \color{blue}{z}, x \cdot y\right) \]

   if -4.99999999999999989e194 < (+.f64 (*.f64 x y) (*.f64 z t)) < 2e180

   1. Initial program 95.9%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]

   2. Taylor expanded in x around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(c \cdot i + t \cdot z\right)} \]
   3. Step-by-step derivation

      1. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(a, \color{blue}{b}, c \cdot i + t \cdot z\right) \]

      2. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, t \cdot z\right)\right) \]

      3. lower-*.f64 74.7

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, t \cdot z\right)\right) \]

   4. Applied rewrites 74.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, t \cdot z\right)\right)} \]

   5. Taylor expanded in z around 0

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, c \cdot i\right) \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. lower-*.f64 51.7

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, c \cdot i\right) \]

   7. Applied rewrites 51.7%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, c \cdot i\right) \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 7: 67.2% accurate, 0.6× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_1 := \mathsf{fma}\left(t, z, x \cdot y\right)\\ t_2 := \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, t \cdot z\right)\\ \mathbf{if}\;a \cdot b \leq -2 \cdot 10^{+78}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_2\\ \mathbf{elif}\;a \cdot b \leq 10^{-228}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_1\\ \mathbf{elif}\;a \cdot b \leq 10^{-58}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(y, x, c \cdot i\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;a \cdot b \leq 10^{+127}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_1\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_2\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_1 (fma t z (* x y))) (t_2 (fma a b (* t z))))
   (if (<= (* a b) -2e+78)
     t_2
     (if (<= (* a b) 1e-228)
       t_1
       (if (<= (* a b) 1e-58)
         (fma y x (* c i))
         (if (<= (* a b) 1e+127) t_1 t_2))))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double t_1 = fma(t, z, (x * y));
	double t_2 = fma(a, b, (t * z));
	double tmp;
	if ((a * b) <= -2e+78) {
		tmp = t_2;
	} else if ((a * b) <= 1e-228) {
		tmp = t_1;
	} else if ((a * b) <= 1e-58) {
		tmp = fma(y, x, (c * i));
	} else if ((a * b) <= 1e+127) {
		tmp = t_1;
	} else {
		tmp = t_2;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	t_1 = fma(t, z, Float64(x * y))
	t_2 = fma(a, b, Float64(t * z))
	tmp = 0.0
	if (Float64(a * b) <= -2e+78)
		tmp = t_2;
	elseif (Float64(a * b) <= 1e-228)
		tmp = t_1;
	elseif (Float64(a * b) <= 1e-58)
		tmp = fma(y, x, Float64(c * i));
	elseif (Float64(a * b) <= 1e+127)
		tmp = t_1;
	else
		tmp = t_2;
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := Block[{t$95$1 = N[(t * z + N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, Block[{t$95$2 = N[(a * b + N[(t * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision], -2e+78], t$95$2, If[LessEqual[N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision], 1e-228], t$95$1, If[LessEqual[N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision], 1e-58], N[(y * x + N[(c * i), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision], 1e+127], t$95$1, t$95$2]]]]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if (*.f64 a b) < -2.00000000000000002e78 or 9.99999999999999955e126 < (*.f64 a b)

   1. Initial program 95.9%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]

   2. Taylor expanded in x around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(c \cdot i + t \cdot z\right)} \]
   3. Step-by-step derivation

      1. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(a, \color{blue}{b}, c \cdot i + t \cdot z\right) \]

      2. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, t \cdot z\right)\right) \]

      3. lower-*.f64 74.7

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, t \cdot z\right)\right) \]

   4. Applied rewrites 74.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, t \cdot z\right)\right)} \]

   5. Taylor expanded in z around 0

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, c \cdot i\right) \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. lower-*.f64 51.7

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, c \cdot i\right) \]

   7. Applied rewrites 51.7%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, c \cdot i\right) \]

   8. Taylor expanded in c around 0

      \[\leadsto a \cdot b + \color{blue}{t \cdot z} \]
   9. Step-by-step derivation

      1. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, t \cdot z\right) \]

      2. lower-*.f64 51.5

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, t \cdot z\right) \]

   10. Applied rewrites 51.5%

       \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(a, \color{blue}{b}, t \cdot z\right) \]

   if -2.00000000000000002e78 < (*.f64 a b) < 1.00000000000000003e-228 or 1e-58 < (*.f64 a b) < 9.99999999999999955e126

   1. Initial program 95.9%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]

   2. Taylor expanded in a around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c \cdot i + \left(t \cdot z + x \cdot y\right)} \]
   3. Step-by-step derivation

      1. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, \color{blue}{i}, t \cdot z + x \cdot y\right) \]

      2. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(t, z, x \cdot y\right)\right) \]

      3. lower-*.f64 75.1

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(t, z, x \cdot y\right)\right) \]

   4. Applied rewrites 75.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(t, z, x \cdot y\right)\right)} \]

   5. Taylor expanded in z around 0

      \[\leadsto c \cdot i + \color{blue}{x \cdot y} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, x \cdot y\right) \]

      2. lower-*.f64 52.0

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, x \cdot y\right) \]

   7. Applied rewrites 52.0%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, \color{blue}{i}, x \cdot y\right) \]

   8. Taylor expanded in x around 0

      \[\leadsto c \cdot i \]
   9. Step-by-step derivation

      1. lower-*.f64 27.5

         \[\leadsto c \cdot i \]

   10. Applied rewrites 27.5%

       \[\leadsto c \cdot i \]

   11. Taylor expanded in c around 0

       \[\leadsto t \cdot z + \color{blue}{x \cdot y} \]
   12. Step-by-step derivation

       1. lower-fma.f64 N/A

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(t, z, x \cdot y\right) \]

       2. lower-*.f64 51.5

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(t, z, x \cdot y\right) \]

   13. Applied rewrites 51.5%

       \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(t, \color{blue}{z}, x \cdot y\right) \]

   if 1.00000000000000003e-228 < (*.f64 a b) < 1e-58

   1. Initial program 95.9%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]

   2. Taylor expanded in a around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c \cdot i + \left(t \cdot z + x \cdot y\right)} \]
   3. Step-by-step derivation

      1. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, \color{blue}{i}, t \cdot z + x \cdot y\right) \]

      2. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(t, z, x \cdot y\right)\right) \]

      3. lower-*.f64 75.1

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(t, z, x \cdot y\right)\right) \]

   4. Applied rewrites 75.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(t, z, x \cdot y\right)\right)} \]

   5. Taylor expanded in z around 0

      \[\leadsto c \cdot i + \color{blue}{x \cdot y} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, x \cdot y\right) \]

      2. lower-*.f64 52.0

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, x \cdot y\right) \]

   7. Applied rewrites 52.0%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, \color{blue}{i}, x \cdot y\right) \]
   8. Step-by-step derivation

      1. lift-*.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, x \cdot y\right) \]

      2. lift-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto c \cdot i + x \cdot \color{blue}{y} \]

      3. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto x \cdot y + c \cdot \color{blue}{i} \]

      4. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto y \cdot x + c \cdot i \]

      5. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, x, c \cdot i\right) \]

      6. lift-*.f64 52.0

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, x, c \cdot i\right) \]

   9. Applied rewrites 52.0%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, x, c \cdot i\right) \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.
4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 8: 67.2% accurate, 0.6× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_1 := \mathsf{fma}\left(t, z, x \cdot y\right)\\ t_2 := \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, t \cdot z\right)\\ \mathbf{if}\;a \cdot b \leq -2 \cdot 10^{+78}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_2\\ \mathbf{elif}\;a \cdot b \leq 10^{-228}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_1\\ \mathbf{elif}\;a \cdot b \leq 10^{-58}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, x \cdot y\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;a \cdot b \leq 10^{+127}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_1\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_2\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_1 (fma t z (* x y))) (t_2 (fma a b (* t z))))
   (if (<= (* a b) -2e+78)
     t_2
     (if (<= (* a b) 1e-228)
       t_1
       (if (<= (* a b) 1e-58)
         (fma c i (* x y))
         (if (<= (* a b) 1e+127) t_1 t_2))))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double t_1 = fma(t, z, (x * y));
	double t_2 = fma(a, b, (t * z));
	double tmp;
	if ((a * b) <= -2e+78) {
		tmp = t_2;
	} else if ((a * b) <= 1e-228) {
		tmp = t_1;
	} else if ((a * b) <= 1e-58) {
		tmp = fma(c, i, (x * y));
	} else if ((a * b) <= 1e+127) {
		tmp = t_1;
	} else {
		tmp = t_2;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	t_1 = fma(t, z, Float64(x * y))
	t_2 = fma(a, b, Float64(t * z))
	tmp = 0.0
	if (Float64(a * b) <= -2e+78)
		tmp = t_2;
	elseif (Float64(a * b) <= 1e-228)
		tmp = t_1;
	elseif (Float64(a * b) <= 1e-58)
		tmp = fma(c, i, Float64(x * y));
	elseif (Float64(a * b) <= 1e+127)
		tmp = t_1;
	else
		tmp = t_2;
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := Block[{t$95$1 = N[(t * z + N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, Block[{t$95$2 = N[(a * b + N[(t * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision], -2e+78], t$95$2, If[LessEqual[N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision], 1e-228], t$95$1, If[LessEqual[N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision], 1e-58], N[(c * i + N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision], 1e+127], t$95$1, t$95$2]]]]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if (*.f64 a b) < -2.00000000000000002e78 or 9.99999999999999955e126 < (*.f64 a b)

   1. Initial program 95.9%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]

   2. Taylor expanded in x around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(c \cdot i + t \cdot z\right)} \]
   3. Step-by-step derivation

      1. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(a, \color{blue}{b}, c \cdot i + t \cdot z\right) \]

      2. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, t \cdot z\right)\right) \]

      3. lower-*.f64 74.7

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, t \cdot z\right)\right) \]

   4. Applied rewrites 74.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, t \cdot z\right)\right)} \]

   5. Taylor expanded in z around 0

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, c \cdot i\right) \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. lower-*.f64 51.7

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, c \cdot i\right) \]

   7. Applied rewrites 51.7%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, c \cdot i\right) \]

   8. Taylor expanded in c around 0

      \[\leadsto a \cdot b + \color{blue}{t \cdot z} \]
   9. Step-by-step derivation

      1. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, t \cdot z\right) \]

      2. lower-*.f64 51.5

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, t \cdot z\right) \]

   10. Applied rewrites 51.5%

       \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(a, \color{blue}{b}, t \cdot z\right) \]

   if -2.00000000000000002e78 < (*.f64 a b) < 1.00000000000000003e-228 or 1e-58 < (*.f64 a b) < 9.99999999999999955e126

   1. Initial program 95.9%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]

   2. Taylor expanded in a around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c \cdot i + \left(t \cdot z + x \cdot y\right)} \]
   3. Step-by-step derivation

      1. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, \color{blue}{i}, t \cdot z + x \cdot y\right) \]

      2. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(t, z, x \cdot y\right)\right) \]

      3. lower-*.f64 75.1

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(t, z, x \cdot y\right)\right) \]

   4. Applied rewrites 75.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(t, z, x \cdot y\right)\right)} \]

   5. Taylor expanded in z around 0

      \[\leadsto c \cdot i + \color{blue}{x \cdot y} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, x \cdot y\right) \]

      2. lower-*.f64 52.0

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, x \cdot y\right) \]

   7. Applied rewrites 52.0%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, \color{blue}{i}, x \cdot y\right) \]

   8. Taylor expanded in x around 0

      \[\leadsto c \cdot i \]
   9. Step-by-step derivation

      1. lower-*.f64 27.5

         \[\leadsto c \cdot i \]

   10. Applied rewrites 27.5%

       \[\leadsto c \cdot i \]

   11. Taylor expanded in c around 0

       \[\leadsto t \cdot z + \color{blue}{x \cdot y} \]
   12. Step-by-step derivation

       1. lower-fma.f64 N/A

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(t, z, x \cdot y\right) \]

       2. lower-*.f64 51.5

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(t, z, x \cdot y\right) \]

   13. Applied rewrites 51.5%

       \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(t, \color{blue}{z}, x \cdot y\right) \]

   if 1.00000000000000003e-228 < (*.f64 a b) < 1e-58

   1. Initial program 95.9%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]

   2. Taylor expanded in a around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c \cdot i + \left(t \cdot z + x \cdot y\right)} \]
   3. Step-by-step derivation

      1. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, \color{blue}{i}, t \cdot z + x \cdot y\right) \]

      2. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(t, z, x \cdot y\right)\right) \]

      3. lower-*.f64 75.1

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(t, z, x \cdot y\right)\right) \]

   4. Applied rewrites 75.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(t, z, x \cdot y\right)\right)} \]

   5. Taylor expanded in z around 0

      \[\leadsto c \cdot i + \color{blue}{x \cdot y} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, x \cdot y\right) \]

      2. lower-*.f64 52.0

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, x \cdot y\right) \]

   7. Applied rewrites 52.0%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, \color{blue}{i}, x \cdot y\right) \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.
4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 9: 62.1% accurate, 1.3× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -5.2 \cdot 10^{+34}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(z, t, b \cdot a\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;z \leq 1.4 \cdot 10^{+29}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, x \cdot y\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, t \cdot z\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= z -5.2e+34)
   (fma z t (* b a))
   (if (<= z 1.4e+29) (fma c i (* x y)) (fma a b (* t z)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double tmp;
	if (z <= -5.2e+34) {
		tmp = fma(z, t, (b * a));
	} else if (z <= 1.4e+29) {
		tmp = fma(c, i, (x * y));
	} else {
		tmp = fma(a, b, (t * z));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (z <= -5.2e+34)
		tmp = fma(z, t, Float64(b * a));
	elseif (z <= 1.4e+29)
		tmp = fma(c, i, Float64(x * y));
	else
		tmp = fma(a, b, Float64(t * z));
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := If[LessEqual[z, -5.2e+34], N[(z * t + N[(b * a), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[z, 1.4e+29], N[(c * i + N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(a * b + N[(t * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if z < -5.19999999999999995e34

   1. Initial program 95.9%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]

   2. Taylor expanded in x around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(c \cdot i + t \cdot z\right)} \]
   3. Step-by-step derivation

      1. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(a, \color{blue}{b}, c \cdot i + t \cdot z\right) \]

      2. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, t \cdot z\right)\right) \]

      3. lower-*.f64 74.7

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, t \cdot z\right)\right) \]

   4. Applied rewrites 74.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, t \cdot z\right)\right)} \]

   5. Taylor expanded in z around 0

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, c \cdot i\right) \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. lower-*.f64 51.7

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, c \cdot i\right) \]

   7. Applied rewrites 51.7%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, c \cdot i\right) \]

   8. Taylor expanded in c around 0

      \[\leadsto a \cdot b + \color{blue}{t \cdot z} \]
   9. Step-by-step derivation

      1. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, t \cdot z\right) \]

      2. lower-*.f64 51.5

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, t \cdot z\right) \]

   10. Applied rewrites 51.5%

       \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(a, \color{blue}{b}, t \cdot z\right) \]
   11. Step-by-step derivation

       1. lift-*.f64 N/A

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, t \cdot z\right) \]

       2. lift-fma.f64 N/A

          \[\leadsto a \cdot b + t \cdot \color{blue}{z} \]

       3. +-commutative N/A

          \[\leadsto t \cdot z + a \cdot \color{blue}{b} \]

       4. *-commutative N/A

          \[\leadsto z \cdot t + a \cdot b \]

       5. lower-fma.f64 N/A

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z, t, a \cdot b\right) \]

       6. *-commutative N/A

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z, t, b \cdot a\right) \]

       7. lower-*.f64 51.5

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z, t, b \cdot a\right) \]

   12. Applied rewrites 51.5%

       \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z, t, b \cdot a\right) \]

   if -5.19999999999999995e34 < z < 1.4e29

   1. Initial program 95.9%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]

   2. Taylor expanded in a around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c \cdot i + \left(t \cdot z + x \cdot y\right)} \]
   3. Step-by-step derivation

      1. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, \color{blue}{i}, t \cdot z + x \cdot y\right) \]

      2. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(t, z, x \cdot y\right)\right) \]

      3. lower-*.f64 75.1

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(t, z, x \cdot y\right)\right) \]

   4. Applied rewrites 75.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(t, z, x \cdot y\right)\right)} \]

   5. Taylor expanded in z around 0

      \[\leadsto c \cdot i + \color{blue}{x \cdot y} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, x \cdot y\right) \]

      2. lower-*.f64 52.0

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, x \cdot y\right) \]

   7. Applied rewrites 52.0%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, \color{blue}{i}, x \cdot y\right) \]

   if 1.4e29 < z

   1. Initial program 95.9%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]

   2. Taylor expanded in x around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(c \cdot i + t \cdot z\right)} \]
   3. Step-by-step derivation

      1. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(a, \color{blue}{b}, c \cdot i + t \cdot z\right) \]

      2. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, t \cdot z\right)\right) \]

      3. lower-*.f64 74.7

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, t \cdot z\right)\right) \]

   4. Applied rewrites 74.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, t \cdot z\right)\right)} \]

   5. Taylor expanded in z around 0

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, c \cdot i\right) \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. lower-*.f64 51.7

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, c \cdot i\right) \]

   7. Applied rewrites 51.7%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, c \cdot i\right) \]

   8. Taylor expanded in c around 0

      \[\leadsto a \cdot b + \color{blue}{t \cdot z} \]
   9. Step-by-step derivation

      1. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, t \cdot z\right) \]

      2. lower-*.f64 51.5

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, t \cdot z\right) \]

   10. Applied rewrites 51.5%

       \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(a, \color{blue}{b}, t \cdot z\right) \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.
4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 10: 62.0% accurate, 0.9× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;c \cdot i \leq -3.4 \cdot 10^{+201}:\\ \;\;\;\;c \cdot i\\ \mathbf{elif}\;c \cdot i \leq 2.6 \cdot 10^{+299}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, t \cdot z\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;c \cdot i\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= (* c i) -3.4e+201)
   (* c i)
   (if (<= (* c i) 2.6e+299) (fma a b (* t z)) (* c i))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double tmp;
	if ((c * i) <= -3.4e+201) {
		tmp = c * i;
	} else if ((c * i) <= 2.6e+299) {
		tmp = fma(a, b, (t * z));
	} else {
		tmp = c * i;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (Float64(c * i) <= -3.4e+201)
		tmp = Float64(c * i);
	elseif (Float64(c * i) <= 2.6e+299)
		tmp = fma(a, b, Float64(t * z));
	else
		tmp = Float64(c * i);
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := If[LessEqual[N[(c * i), $MachinePrecision], -3.4e+201], N[(c * i), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[N[(c * i), $MachinePrecision], 2.6e+299], N[(a * b + N[(t * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(c * i), $MachinePrecision]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (*.f64 c i) < -3.4e201 or 2.6e299 < (*.f64 c i)

   1. Initial program 95.9%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]

   2. Taylor expanded in a around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c \cdot i + \left(t \cdot z + x \cdot y\right)} \]
   3. Step-by-step derivation

      1. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, \color{blue}{i}, t \cdot z + x \cdot y\right) \]

      2. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(t, z, x \cdot y\right)\right) \]

      3. lower-*.f64 75.1

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(t, z, x \cdot y\right)\right) \]

   4. Applied rewrites 75.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(t, z, x \cdot y\right)\right)} \]

   5. Taylor expanded in z around 0

      \[\leadsto c \cdot i + \color{blue}{x \cdot y} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, x \cdot y\right) \]

      2. lower-*.f64 52.0

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, x \cdot y\right) \]

   7. Applied rewrites 52.0%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, \color{blue}{i}, x \cdot y\right) \]

   8. Taylor expanded in x around 0

      \[\leadsto c \cdot i \]
   9. Step-by-step derivation

      1. lower-*.f64 27.5

         \[\leadsto c \cdot i \]

   10. Applied rewrites 27.5%

       \[\leadsto c \cdot i \]

   if -3.4e201 < (*.f64 c i) < 2.6e299

   1. Initial program 95.9%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]

   2. Taylor expanded in x around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(c \cdot i + t \cdot z\right)} \]
   3. Step-by-step derivation

      1. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(a, \color{blue}{b}, c \cdot i + t \cdot z\right) \]

      2. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, t \cdot z\right)\right) \]

      3. lower-*.f64 74.7

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, t \cdot z\right)\right) \]

   4. Applied rewrites 74.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, t \cdot z\right)\right)} \]

   5. Taylor expanded in z around 0

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, c \cdot i\right) \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. lower-*.f64 51.7

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, c \cdot i\right) \]

   7. Applied rewrites 51.7%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, c \cdot i\right) \]

   8. Taylor expanded in c around 0

      \[\leadsto a \cdot b + \color{blue}{t \cdot z} \]
   9. Step-by-step derivation

      1. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, t \cdot z\right) \]

      2. lower-*.f64 51.5

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, t \cdot z\right) \]

   10. Applied rewrites 51.5%

       \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(a, \color{blue}{b}, t \cdot z\right) \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 11: 43.4% accurate, 0.7× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;a \cdot b \leq -1.1 \cdot 10^{+99}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot b\\ \mathbf{elif}\;a \cdot b \leq 4 \cdot 10^{-276}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot y\\ \mathbf{elif}\;a \cdot b \leq 3.4 \cdot 10^{-52}:\\ \;\;\;\;c \cdot i\\ \mathbf{elif}\;a \cdot b \leq 8.2 \cdot 10^{+126}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot y\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot b\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= (* a b) -1.1e+99)
   (* a b)
   (if (<= (* a b) 4e-276)
     (* x y)
     (if (<= (* a b) 3.4e-52)
       (* c i)
       (if (<= (* a b) 8.2e+126) (* x y) (* a b))))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double tmp;
	if ((a * b) <= -1.1e+99) {
		tmp = a * b;
	} else if ((a * b) <= 4e-276) {
		tmp = x * y;
	} else if ((a * b) <= 3.4e-52) {
		tmp = c * i;
	} else if ((a * b) <= 8.2e+126) {
		tmp = x * y;
	} else {
		tmp = a * b;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

module fmin_fmax_functions
    implicit none
    private
    public fmax
    public fmin

    interface fmax
        module procedure fmax88
        module procedure fmax44
        module procedure fmax84
        module procedure fmax48
    end interface
    interface fmin
        module procedure fmin88
        module procedure fmin44
        module procedure fmin84
        module procedure fmin48
    end interface
contains
    real(8) function fmax88(x, y) result (res)
        real(8), intent (in) :: x
        real(8), intent (in) :: y
        res = merge(y, merge(x, max(x, y), y /= y), x /= x)
    end function
    real(4) function fmax44(x, y) result (res)
        real(4), intent (in) :: x
        real(4), intent (in) :: y
        res = merge(y, merge(x, max(x, y), y /= y), x /= x)
    end function
    real(8) function fmax84(x, y) result(res)
        real(8), intent (in) :: x
        real(4), intent (in) :: y
        res = merge(dble(y), merge(x, max(x, dble(y)), y /= y), x /= x)
    end function
    real(8) function fmax48(x, y) result(res)
        real(4), intent (in) :: x
        real(8), intent (in) :: y
        res = merge(y, merge(dble(x), max(dble(x), y), y /= y), x /= x)
    end function
    real(8) function fmin88(x, y) result (res)
        real(8), intent (in) :: x
        real(8), intent (in) :: y
        res = merge(y, merge(x, min(x, y), y /= y), x /= x)
    end function
    real(4) function fmin44(x, y) result (res)
        real(4), intent (in) :: x
        real(4), intent (in) :: y
        res = merge(y, merge(x, min(x, y), y /= y), x /= x)
    end function
    real(8) function fmin84(x, y) result(res)
        real(8), intent (in) :: x
        real(4), intent (in) :: y
        res = merge(dble(y), merge(x, min(x, dble(y)), y /= y), x /= x)
    end function
    real(8) function fmin48(x, y) result(res)
        real(4), intent (in) :: x
        real(8), intent (in) :: y
        res = merge(y, merge(dble(x), min(dble(x), y), y /= y), x /= x)
    end function
end module

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
use fmin_fmax_functions
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: c
    real(8), intent (in) :: i
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((a * b) <= (-1.1d+99)) then
        tmp = a * b
    else if ((a * b) <= 4d-276) then
        tmp = x * y
    else if ((a * b) <= 3.4d-52) then
        tmp = c * i
    else if ((a * b) <= 8.2d+126) then
        tmp = x * y
    else
        tmp = a * b
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double tmp;
	if ((a * b) <= -1.1e+99) {
		tmp = a * b;
	} else if ((a * b) <= 4e-276) {
		tmp = x * y;
	} else if ((a * b) <= 3.4e-52) {
		tmp = c * i;
	} else if ((a * b) <= 8.2e+126) {
		tmp = x * y;
	} else {
		tmp = a * b;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i):
	tmp = 0
	if (a * b) <= -1.1e+99:
		tmp = a * b
	elif (a * b) <= 4e-276:
		tmp = x * y
	elif (a * b) <= 3.4e-52:
		tmp = c * i
	elif (a * b) <= 8.2e+126:
		tmp = x * y
	else:
		tmp = a * b
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (Float64(a * b) <= -1.1e+99)
		tmp = Float64(a * b);
	elseif (Float64(a * b) <= 4e-276)
		tmp = Float64(x * y);
	elseif (Float64(a * b) <= 3.4e-52)
		tmp = Float64(c * i);
	elseif (Float64(a * b) <= 8.2e+126)
		tmp = Float64(x * y);
	else
		tmp = Float64(a * b);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((a * b) <= -1.1e+99)
		tmp = a * b;
	elseif ((a * b) <= 4e-276)
		tmp = x * y;
	elseif ((a * b) <= 3.4e-52)
		tmp = c * i;
	elseif ((a * b) <= 8.2e+126)
		tmp = x * y;
	else
		tmp = a * b;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := If[LessEqual[N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision], -1.1e+99], N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision], 4e-276], N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision], 3.4e-52], N[(c * i), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision], 8.2e+126], N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision], N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision]]]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if (*.f64 a b) < -1.09999999999999989e99 or 8.2000000000000001e126 < (*.f64 a b)

   1. Initial program 95.9%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]

   2. Taylor expanded in x around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(c \cdot i + t \cdot z\right)} \]
   3. Step-by-step derivation

      1. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(a, \color{blue}{b}, c \cdot i + t \cdot z\right) \]

      2. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, t \cdot z\right)\right) \]

      3. lower-*.f64 74.7

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, t \cdot z\right)\right) \]

   4. Applied rewrites 74.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, t \cdot z\right)\right)} \]

   5. Taylor expanded in z around 0

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, c \cdot i\right) \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. lower-*.f64 51.7

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, c \cdot i\right) \]

   7. Applied rewrites 51.7%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, c \cdot i\right) \]

   8. Taylor expanded in c around 0

      \[\leadsto a \cdot b + \color{blue}{t \cdot z} \]
   9. Step-by-step derivation

      1. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, t \cdot z\right) \]

      2. lower-*.f64 51.5

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, t \cdot z\right) \]

   10. Applied rewrites 51.5%

       \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(a, \color{blue}{b}, t \cdot z\right) \]

   11. Taylor expanded in z around 0

       \[\leadsto a \cdot b \]
   12. Step-by-step derivation

       1. lower-*.f64 27.6

          \[\leadsto a \cdot b \]

   13. Applied rewrites 27.6%

       \[\leadsto a \cdot b \]

   if -1.09999999999999989e99 < (*.f64 a b) < 4e-276 or 3.40000000000000017e-52 < (*.f64 a b) < 8.2000000000000001e126

   1. Initial program 95.9%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]

   2. Taylor expanded in x around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(c \cdot i + t \cdot z\right)} \]
   3. Step-by-step derivation

      1. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(a, \color{blue}{b}, c \cdot i + t \cdot z\right) \]

      2. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, t \cdot z\right)\right) \]

      3. lower-*.f64 74.7

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, t \cdot z\right)\right) \]

   4. Applied rewrites 74.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, t \cdot z\right)\right)} \]

   5. Taylor expanded in z around 0

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, c \cdot i\right) \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. lower-*.f64 51.7

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, c \cdot i\right) \]

   7. Applied rewrites 51.7%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, c \cdot i\right) \]

   8. Taylor expanded in c around 0

      \[\leadsto a \cdot b + \color{blue}{t \cdot z} \]
   9. Step-by-step derivation

      1. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, t \cdot z\right) \]

      2. lower-*.f64 51.5

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, t \cdot z\right) \]

   10. Applied rewrites 51.5%

       \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(a, \color{blue}{b}, t \cdot z\right) \]

   11. Taylor expanded in x around inf

       \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot y} \]
   12. Step-by-step derivation

       1. lower-*.f64 27.5

          \[\leadsto x \cdot \color{blue}{y} \]

   13. Applied rewrites 27.5%

       \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot y} \]

   if 4e-276 < (*.f64 a b) < 3.40000000000000017e-52

   1. Initial program 95.9%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]

   2. Taylor expanded in a around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c \cdot i + \left(t \cdot z + x \cdot y\right)} \]
   3. Step-by-step derivation

      1. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, \color{blue}{i}, t \cdot z + x \cdot y\right) \]

      2. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(t, z, x \cdot y\right)\right) \]

      3. lower-*.f64 75.1

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(t, z, x \cdot y\right)\right) \]

   4. Applied rewrites 75.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(t, z, x \cdot y\right)\right)} \]

   5. Taylor expanded in z around 0

      \[\leadsto c \cdot i + \color{blue}{x \cdot y} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, x \cdot y\right) \]

      2. lower-*.f64 52.0

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, x \cdot y\right) \]

   7. Applied rewrites 52.0%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, \color{blue}{i}, x \cdot y\right) \]

   8. Taylor expanded in x around 0

      \[\leadsto c \cdot i \]
   9. Step-by-step derivation

      1. lower-*.f64 27.5

         \[\leadsto c \cdot i \]

   10. Applied rewrites 27.5%

       \[\leadsto c \cdot i \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.
4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 12: 42.5% accurate, 1.2× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;a \cdot b \leq -2.7 \cdot 10^{+14}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot b\\ \mathbf{elif}\;a \cdot b \leq 3.15 \cdot 10^{+182}:\\ \;\;\;\;c \cdot i\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot b\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= (* a b) -2.7e+14)
   (* a b)
   (if (<= (* a b) 3.15e+182) (* c i) (* a b))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double tmp;
	if ((a * b) <= -2.7e+14) {
		tmp = a * b;
	} else if ((a * b) <= 3.15e+182) {
		tmp = c * i;
	} else {
		tmp = a * b;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

module fmin_fmax_functions
    implicit none
    private
    public fmax
    public fmin

    interface fmax
        module procedure fmax88
        module procedure fmax44
        module procedure fmax84
        module procedure fmax48
    end interface
    interface fmin
        module procedure fmin88
        module procedure fmin44
        module procedure fmin84
        module procedure fmin48
    end interface
contains
    real(8) function fmax88(x, y) result (res)
        real(8), intent (in) :: x
        real(8), intent (in) :: y
        res = merge(y, merge(x, max(x, y), y /= y), x /= x)
    end function
    real(4) function fmax44(x, y) result (res)
        real(4), intent (in) :: x
        real(4), intent (in) :: y
        res = merge(y, merge(x, max(x, y), y /= y), x /= x)
    end function
    real(8) function fmax84(x, y) result(res)
        real(8), intent (in) :: x
        real(4), intent (in) :: y
        res = merge(dble(y), merge(x, max(x, dble(y)), y /= y), x /= x)
    end function
    real(8) function fmax48(x, y) result(res)
        real(4), intent (in) :: x
        real(8), intent (in) :: y
        res = merge(y, merge(dble(x), max(dble(x), y), y /= y), x /= x)
    end function
    real(8) function fmin88(x, y) result (res)
        real(8), intent (in) :: x
        real(8), intent (in) :: y
        res = merge(y, merge(x, min(x, y), y /= y), x /= x)
    end function
    real(4) function fmin44(x, y) result (res)
        real(4), intent (in) :: x
        real(4), intent (in) :: y
        res = merge(y, merge(x, min(x, y), y /= y), x /= x)
    end function
    real(8) function fmin84(x, y) result(res)
        real(8), intent (in) :: x
        real(4), intent (in) :: y
        res = merge(dble(y), merge(x, min(x, dble(y)), y /= y), x /= x)
    end function
    real(8) function fmin48(x, y) result(res)
        real(4), intent (in) :: x
        real(8), intent (in) :: y
        res = merge(y, merge(dble(x), min(dble(x), y), y /= y), x /= x)
    end function
end module

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
use fmin_fmax_functions
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: c
    real(8), intent (in) :: i
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((a * b) <= (-2.7d+14)) then
        tmp = a * b
    else if ((a * b) <= 3.15d+182) then
        tmp = c * i
    else
        tmp = a * b
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double tmp;
	if ((a * b) <= -2.7e+14) {
		tmp = a * b;
	} else if ((a * b) <= 3.15e+182) {
		tmp = c * i;
	} else {
		tmp = a * b;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i):
	tmp = 0
	if (a * b) <= -2.7e+14:
		tmp = a * b
	elif (a * b) <= 3.15e+182:
		tmp = c * i
	else:
		tmp = a * b
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (Float64(a * b) <= -2.7e+14)
		tmp = Float64(a * b);
	elseif (Float64(a * b) <= 3.15e+182)
		tmp = Float64(c * i);
	else
		tmp = Float64(a * b);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((a * b) <= -2.7e+14)
		tmp = a * b;
	elseif ((a * b) <= 3.15e+182)
		tmp = c * i;
	else
		tmp = a * b;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := If[LessEqual[N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision], -2.7e+14], N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision], 3.15e+182], N[(c * i), $MachinePrecision], N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (*.f64 a b) < -2.7e14 or 3.15000000000000014e182 < (*.f64 a b)

   1. Initial program 95.9%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]

   2. Taylor expanded in x around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(c \cdot i + t \cdot z\right)} \]
   3. Step-by-step derivation

      1. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(a, \color{blue}{b}, c \cdot i + t \cdot z\right) \]

      2. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, t \cdot z\right)\right) \]

      3. lower-*.f64 74.7

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, t \cdot z\right)\right) \]

   4. Applied rewrites 74.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, t \cdot z\right)\right)} \]

   5. Taylor expanded in z around 0

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, c \cdot i\right) \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. lower-*.f64 51.7

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, c \cdot i\right) \]

   7. Applied rewrites 51.7%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, c \cdot i\right) \]

   8. Taylor expanded in c around 0

      \[\leadsto a \cdot b + \color{blue}{t \cdot z} \]
   9. Step-by-step derivation

      1. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, t \cdot z\right) \]

      2. lower-*.f64 51.5

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, t \cdot z\right) \]

   10. Applied rewrites 51.5%

       \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(a, \color{blue}{b}, t \cdot z\right) \]

   11. Taylor expanded in z around 0

       \[\leadsto a \cdot b \]
   12. Step-by-step derivation

       1. lower-*.f64 27.6

          \[\leadsto a \cdot b \]

   13. Applied rewrites 27.6%

       \[\leadsto a \cdot b \]

   if -2.7e14 < (*.f64 a b) < 3.15000000000000014e182

   1. Initial program 95.9%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]

   2. Taylor expanded in a around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c \cdot i + \left(t \cdot z + x \cdot y\right)} \]
   3. Step-by-step derivation

      1. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, \color{blue}{i}, t \cdot z + x \cdot y\right) \]

      2. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(t, z, x \cdot y\right)\right) \]

      3. lower-*.f64 75.1

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(t, z, x \cdot y\right)\right) \]

   4. Applied rewrites 75.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(t, z, x \cdot y\right)\right)} \]

   5. Taylor expanded in z around 0

      \[\leadsto c \cdot i + \color{blue}{x \cdot y} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, x \cdot y\right) \]

      2. lower-*.f64 52.0

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, x \cdot y\right) \]

   7. Applied rewrites 52.0%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, \color{blue}{i}, x \cdot y\right) \]

   8. Taylor expanded in x around 0

      \[\leadsto c \cdot i \]
   9. Step-by-step derivation

      1. lower-*.f64 27.5

         \[\leadsto c \cdot i \]

   10. Applied rewrites 27.5%

       \[\leadsto c \cdot i \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 13: 27.6% accurate, 5.3× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ a \cdot b \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b c i) :precision binary64 (* a b))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	return a * b;
}

Fortran

module fmin_fmax_functions
    implicit none
    private
    public fmax
    public fmin

    interface fmax
        module procedure fmax88
        module procedure fmax44
        module procedure fmax84
        module procedure fmax48
    end interface
    interface fmin
        module procedure fmin88
        module procedure fmin44
        module procedure fmin84
        module procedure fmin48
    end interface
contains
    real(8) function fmax88(x, y) result (res)
        real(8), intent (in) :: x
        real(8), intent (in) :: y
        res = merge(y, merge(x, max(x, y), y /= y), x /= x)
    end function
    real(4) function fmax44(x, y) result (res)
        real(4), intent (in) :: x
        real(4), intent (in) :: y
        res = merge(y, merge(x, max(x, y), y /= y), x /= x)
    end function
    real(8) function fmax84(x, y) result(res)
        real(8), intent (in) :: x
        real(4), intent (in) :: y
        res = merge(dble(y), merge(x, max(x, dble(y)), y /= y), x /= x)
    end function
    real(8) function fmax48(x, y) result(res)
        real(4), intent (in) :: x
        real(8), intent (in) :: y
        res = merge(y, merge(dble(x), max(dble(x), y), y /= y), x /= x)
    end function
    real(8) function fmin88(x, y) result (res)
        real(8), intent (in) :: x
        real(8), intent (in) :: y
        res = merge(y, merge(x, min(x, y), y /= y), x /= x)
    end function
    real(4) function fmin44(x, y) result (res)
        real(4), intent (in) :: x
        real(4), intent (in) :: y
        res = merge(y, merge(x, min(x, y), y /= y), x /= x)
    end function
    real(8) function fmin84(x, y) result(res)
        real(8), intent (in) :: x
        real(4), intent (in) :: y
        res = merge(dble(y), merge(x, min(x, dble(y)), y /= y), x /= x)
    end function
    real(8) function fmin48(x, y) result(res)
        real(4), intent (in) :: x
        real(8), intent (in) :: y
        res = merge(y, merge(dble(x), min(dble(x), y), y /= y), x /= x)
    end function
end module

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
use fmin_fmax_functions
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: c
    real(8), intent (in) :: i
    code = a * b
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	return a * b;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i):
	return a * b

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	return Float64(a * b)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = a * b;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 95.9%

   \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]

2. Taylor expanded in x around 0

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(c \cdot i + t \cdot z\right)} \]
3. Step-by-step derivation

   1. lower-fma.f64 N/A

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(a, \color{blue}{b}, c \cdot i + t \cdot z\right) \]

   2. lower-fma.f64 N/A

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, t \cdot z\right)\right) \]

   3. lower-*.f64 74.7

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, t \cdot z\right)\right) \]

4. Applied rewrites 74.7%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, t \cdot z\right)\right)} \]

5. Taylor expanded in z around 0

   \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, c \cdot i\right) \]
6. Step-by-step derivation

   1. lower-*.f64 51.7

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, c \cdot i\right) \]

7. Applied rewrites 51.7%

   \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, c \cdot i\right) \]

8. Taylor expanded in c around 0

   \[\leadsto a \cdot b + \color{blue}{t \cdot z} \]
9. Step-by-step derivation

   1. lower-fma.f64 N/A

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, t \cdot z\right) \]

   2. lower-*.f64 51.5

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, t \cdot z\right) \]

10. Applied rewrites 51.5%

    \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(a, \color{blue}{b}, t \cdot z\right) \]

11. Taylor expanded in z around 0

    \[\leadsto a \cdot b \]
12. Step-by-step derivation

    1. lower-*.f64 27.6

       \[\leadsto a \cdot b \]

13. Applied rewrites 27.6%

    \[\leadsto a \cdot b \]
14. Add Preprocessing

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2025159 
(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
  :name "Linear.V4:$cdot from linear-1.19.1.3, C"
  :precision binary64
  (+ (+ (+ (* x y) (* z t)) (* a b)) (* c i)))