Falkner and Boettcher, Appendix A

Percentage Accurate: 90.4% → 97.9%

Time: 10.5s

Alternatives: 9

Speedup: 1.3×

• 22.1% of points produce a very large (infinite) output. You may want to add a precondition.

Specification

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \frac{a \cdot {k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (a k m)
 :precision binary64
 (/ (* a (pow k m)) (+ (+ 1.0 (* 10.0 k)) (* k k))))

C

double code(double a, double k, double m) {
	return (a * pow(k, m)) / ((1.0 + (10.0 * k)) + (k * k));
}

Fortran

module fmin_fmax_functions
    implicit none
    private
    public fmax
    public fmin

    interface fmax
        module procedure fmax88
        module procedure fmax44
        module procedure fmax84
        module procedure fmax48
    end interface
    interface fmin
        module procedure fmin88
        module procedure fmin44
        module procedure fmin84
        module procedure fmin48
    end interface
contains
    real(8) function fmax88(x, y) result (res)
        real(8), intent (in) :: x
        real(8), intent (in) :: y
        res = merge(y, merge(x, max(x, y), y /= y), x /= x)
    end function
    real(4) function fmax44(x, y) result (res)
        real(4), intent (in) :: x
        real(4), intent (in) :: y
        res = merge(y, merge(x, max(x, y), y /= y), x /= x)
    end function
    real(8) function fmax84(x, y) result(res)
        real(8), intent (in) :: x
        real(4), intent (in) :: y
        res = merge(dble(y), merge(x, max(x, dble(y)), y /= y), x /= x)
    end function
    real(8) function fmax48(x, y) result(res)
        real(4), intent (in) :: x
        real(8), intent (in) :: y
        res = merge(y, merge(dble(x), max(dble(x), y), y /= y), x /= x)
    end function
    real(8) function fmin88(x, y) result (res)
        real(8), intent (in) :: x
        real(8), intent (in) :: y
        res = merge(y, merge(x, min(x, y), y /= y), x /= x)
    end function
    real(4) function fmin44(x, y) result (res)
        real(4), intent (in) :: x
        real(4), intent (in) :: y
        res = merge(y, merge(x, min(x, y), y /= y), x /= x)
    end function
    real(8) function fmin84(x, y) result(res)
        real(8), intent (in) :: x
        real(4), intent (in) :: y
        res = merge(dble(y), merge(x, min(x, dble(y)), y /= y), x /= x)
    end function
    real(8) function fmin48(x, y) result(res)
        real(4), intent (in) :: x
        real(8), intent (in) :: y
        res = merge(y, merge(dble(x), min(dble(x), y), y /= y), x /= x)
    end function
end module

real(8) function code(a, k, m)
use fmin_fmax_functions
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: k
    real(8), intent (in) :: m
    code = (a * (k ** m)) / ((1.0d0 + (10.0d0 * k)) + (k * k))
end function

Java

public static double code(double a, double k, double m) {
	return (a * Math.pow(k, m)) / ((1.0 + (10.0 * k)) + (k * k));
}

Python

def code(a, k, m):
	return (a * math.pow(k, m)) / ((1.0 + (10.0 * k)) + (k * k))

Julia

function code(a, k, m)
	return Float64(Float64(a * (k ^ m)) / Float64(Float64(1.0 + Float64(10.0 * k)) + Float64(k * k)))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(a, k, m)
	tmp = (a * (k ^ m)) / ((1.0 + (10.0 * k)) + (k * k));
end

Wolfram

code[a_, k_, m_] := N[(N[(a * N[Power[k, m], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / N[(N[(1.0 + N[(10.0 * k), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(k * k), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Initial Program: 90.4% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \frac{a \cdot {k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (a k m)
 :precision binary64
 (/ (* a (pow k m)) (+ (+ 1.0 (* 10.0 k)) (* k k))))

C

double code(double a, double k, double m) {
	return (a * pow(k, m)) / ((1.0 + (10.0 * k)) + (k * k));
}

Fortran

module fmin_fmax_functions
    implicit none
    private
    public fmax
    public fmin

    interface fmax
        module procedure fmax88
        module procedure fmax44
        module procedure fmax84
        module procedure fmax48
    end interface
    interface fmin
        module procedure fmin88
        module procedure fmin44
        module procedure fmin84
        module procedure fmin48
    end interface
contains
    real(8) function fmax88(x, y) result (res)
        real(8), intent (in) :: x
        real(8), intent (in) :: y
        res = merge(y, merge(x, max(x, y), y /= y), x /= x)
    end function
    real(4) function fmax44(x, y) result (res)
        real(4), intent (in) :: x
        real(4), intent (in) :: y
        res = merge(y, merge(x, max(x, y), y /= y), x /= x)
    end function
    real(8) function fmax84(x, y) result(res)
        real(8), intent (in) :: x
        real(4), intent (in) :: y
        res = merge(dble(y), merge(x, max(x, dble(y)), y /= y), x /= x)
    end function
    real(8) function fmax48(x, y) result(res)
        real(4), intent (in) :: x
        real(8), intent (in) :: y
        res = merge(y, merge(dble(x), max(dble(x), y), y /= y), x /= x)
    end function
    real(8) function fmin88(x, y) result (res)
        real(8), intent (in) :: x
        real(8), intent (in) :: y
        res = merge(y, merge(x, min(x, y), y /= y), x /= x)
    end function
    real(4) function fmin44(x, y) result (res)
        real(4), intent (in) :: x
        real(4), intent (in) :: y
        res = merge(y, merge(x, min(x, y), y /= y), x /= x)
    end function
    real(8) function fmin84(x, y) result(res)
        real(8), intent (in) :: x
        real(4), intent (in) :: y
        res = merge(dble(y), merge(x, min(x, dble(y)), y /= y), x /= x)
    end function
    real(8) function fmin48(x, y) result(res)
        real(4), intent (in) :: x
        real(8), intent (in) :: y
        res = merge(y, merge(dble(x), min(dble(x), y), y /= y), x /= x)
    end function
end module

real(8) function code(a, k, m)
use fmin_fmax_functions
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: k
    real(8), intent (in) :: m
    code = (a * (k ** m)) / ((1.0d0 + (10.0d0 * k)) + (k * k))
end function

Java

public static double code(double a, double k, double m) {
	return (a * Math.pow(k, m)) / ((1.0 + (10.0 * k)) + (k * k));
}

Python

def code(a, k, m):
	return (a * math.pow(k, m)) / ((1.0 + (10.0 * k)) + (k * k))

Julia

function code(a, k, m)
	return Float64(Float64(a * (k ^ m)) / Float64(Float64(1.0 + Float64(10.0 * k)) + Float64(k * k)))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(a, k, m)
	tmp = (a * (k ^ m)) / ((1.0 + (10.0 * k)) + (k * k));
end

Wolfram

code[a_, k_, m_] := N[(N[(a * N[Power[k, m], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / N[(N[(1.0 + N[(10.0 * k), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(k * k), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Alternative 1: 97.9% accurate, 1.3× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_0 := {k}^{m} \cdot a\\ \mathbf{if}\;m \leq -0.039:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_0\\ \mathbf{elif}\;m \leq 2.5 \cdot 10^{-8}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{a}{\mathsf{fma}\left(k + 10, k, 1\right)}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_0\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (a k m)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_0 (* (pow k m) a)))
   (if (<= m -0.039) t_0 (if (<= m 2.5e-8) (/ a (fma (+ k 10.0) k 1.0)) t_0))))

C

double code(double a, double k, double m) {
	double t_0 = pow(k, m) * a;
	double tmp;
	if (m <= -0.039) {
		tmp = t_0;
	} else if (m <= 2.5e-8) {
		tmp = a / fma((k + 10.0), k, 1.0);
	} else {
		tmp = t_0;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Julia

function code(a, k, m)
	t_0 = Float64((k ^ m) * a)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (m <= -0.039)
		tmp = t_0;
	elseif (m <= 2.5e-8)
		tmp = Float64(a / fma(Float64(k + 10.0), k, 1.0));
	else
		tmp = t_0;
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

code[a_, k_, m_] := Block[{t$95$0 = N[(N[Power[k, m], $MachinePrecision] * a), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[m, -0.039], t$95$0, If[LessEqual[m, 2.5e-8], N[(a / N[(N[(k + 10.0), $MachinePrecision] * k + 1.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], t$95$0]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if m < -0.0389999999999999999 or 2.4999999999999999e-8 < m

   1. Initial program 90.4%

      \[\frac{a \cdot {k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k} \]

   3. Applied rewrites 90.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{{k}^{m}}{\mathsf{fma}\left(k + 10, k, 1\right)} \cdot a} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in k around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{{k}^{m}} \cdot a \]

   6. Applied rewrites 82.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{{k}^{m}} \cdot a \]

   if -0.0389999999999999999 < m < 2.4999999999999999e-8

   1. Initial program 90.4%

      \[\frac{a \cdot {k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k} \]

   2. Taylor expanded in m around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{a}{1 + \left(10 \cdot k + {k}^{2}\right)}} \]

   4. Applied rewrites 44.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{a}{1 + \mathsf{fma}\left(10, k, {k}^{2}\right)}} \]

   6. Applied rewrites 44.7%

      \[\leadsto \frac{a}{\mathsf{fma}\left(k + 10, \color{blue}{k}, 1\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 2: 97.9% accurate, 0.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_0 := \frac{a \cdot {k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}\\ \mathbf{if}\;t\_0 \leq \infty:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_0\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(99 \cdot k - 10, k, 1\right) \cdot a\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (a k m)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_0 (/ (* a (pow k m)) (+ (+ 1.0 (* 10.0 k)) (* k k)))))
   (if (<= t_0 INFINITY) t_0 (* (fma (- (* 99.0 k) 10.0) k 1.0) a))))

C

double code(double a, double k, double m) {
	double t_0 = (a * pow(k, m)) / ((1.0 + (10.0 * k)) + (k * k));
	double tmp;
	if (t_0 <= ((double) INFINITY)) {
		tmp = t_0;
	} else {
		tmp = fma(((99.0 * k) - 10.0), k, 1.0) * a;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Julia

function code(a, k, m)
	t_0 = Float64(Float64(a * (k ^ m)) / Float64(Float64(1.0 + Float64(10.0 * k)) + Float64(k * k)))
	tmp = 0.0
	if (t_0 <= Inf)
		tmp = t_0;
	else
		tmp = Float64(fma(Float64(Float64(99.0 * k) - 10.0), k, 1.0) * a);
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

code[a_, k_, m_] := Block[{t$95$0 = N[(N[(a * N[Power[k, m], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / N[(N[(1.0 + N[(10.0 * k), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(k * k), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[t$95$0, Infinity], t$95$0, N[(N[(N[(N[(99.0 * k), $MachinePrecision] - 10.0), $MachinePrecision] * k + 1.0), $MachinePrecision] * a), $MachinePrecision]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (/.f64 (*.f64 a (pow.f64 k m)) (+.f64 (+.f64 #s(literal 1 binary64) (*.f64 #s(literal 10 binary64) k)) (*.f64 k k))) < +inf.0

   1. Initial program 90.4%

      \[\frac{a \cdot {k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k} \]

   if +inf.0 < (/.f64 (*.f64 a (pow.f64 k m)) (+.f64 (+.f64 #s(literal 1 binary64) (*.f64 #s(literal 10 binary64) k)) (*.f64 k k)))

   1. Initial program 90.4%

      \[\frac{a \cdot {k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k} \]

   2. Taylor expanded in m around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{a}{1 + \left(10 \cdot k + {k}^{2}\right)}} \]

   4. Applied rewrites 44.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{a}{1 + \mathsf{fma}\left(10, k, {k}^{2}\right)}} \]

   6. Applied rewrites 44.7%

      \[\leadsto \frac{1}{\mathsf{fma}\left(k + 10, k, 1\right)} \cdot \color{blue}{a} \]

   7. Taylor expanded in k around 0

      \[\leadsto \left(1 + k \cdot \left(99 \cdot k - 10\right)\right) \cdot a \]

   9. Applied rewrites 28.3%

      \[\leadsto \left(1 + k \cdot \left(99 \cdot k - 10\right)\right) \cdot a \]

   11. Applied rewrites 28.3%

       \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(99 \cdot k - 10, k, 1\right) \cdot a \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 3: 97.2% accurate, 0.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\frac{a \cdot {k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k} \leq \infty:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{{k}^{m}}{\mathsf{fma}\left(k + 10, k, 1\right)} \cdot a\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(99 \cdot k - 10, k, 1\right) \cdot a\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (a k m)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= (/ (* a (pow k m)) (+ (+ 1.0 (* 10.0 k)) (* k k))) INFINITY)
   (* (/ (pow k m) (fma (+ k 10.0) k 1.0)) a)
   (* (fma (- (* 99.0 k) 10.0) k 1.0) a)))

C

double code(double a, double k, double m) {
	double tmp;
	if (((a * pow(k, m)) / ((1.0 + (10.0 * k)) + (k * k))) <= ((double) INFINITY)) {
		tmp = (pow(k, m) / fma((k + 10.0), k, 1.0)) * a;
	} else {
		tmp = fma(((99.0 * k) - 10.0), k, 1.0) * a;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Julia

function code(a, k, m)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (Float64(Float64(a * (k ^ m)) / Float64(Float64(1.0 + Float64(10.0 * k)) + Float64(k * k))) <= Inf)
		tmp = Float64(Float64((k ^ m) / fma(Float64(k + 10.0), k, 1.0)) * a);
	else
		tmp = Float64(fma(Float64(Float64(99.0 * k) - 10.0), k, 1.0) * a);
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

code[a_, k_, m_] := If[LessEqual[N[(N[(a * N[Power[k, m], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / N[(N[(1.0 + N[(10.0 * k), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(k * k), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], Infinity], N[(N[(N[Power[k, m], $MachinePrecision] / N[(N[(k + 10.0), $MachinePrecision] * k + 1.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] * a), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[(N[(N[(99.0 * k), $MachinePrecision] - 10.0), $MachinePrecision] * k + 1.0), $MachinePrecision] * a), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (/.f64 (*.f64 a (pow.f64 k m)) (+.f64 (+.f64 #s(literal 1 binary64) (*.f64 #s(literal 10 binary64) k)) (*.f64 k k))) < +inf.0

   1. Initial program 90.4%

      \[\frac{a \cdot {k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k} \]

   3. Applied rewrites 90.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{{k}^{m}}{\mathsf{fma}\left(k + 10, k, 1\right)} \cdot a} \]

   if +inf.0 < (/.f64 (*.f64 a (pow.f64 k m)) (+.f64 (+.f64 #s(literal 1 binary64) (*.f64 #s(literal 10 binary64) k)) (*.f64 k k)))

   1. Initial program 90.4%

      \[\frac{a \cdot {k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k} \]

   2. Taylor expanded in m around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{a}{1 + \left(10 \cdot k + {k}^{2}\right)}} \]

   4. Applied rewrites 44.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{a}{1 + \mathsf{fma}\left(10, k, {k}^{2}\right)}} \]

   6. Applied rewrites 44.7%

      \[\leadsto \frac{1}{\mathsf{fma}\left(k + 10, k, 1\right)} \cdot \color{blue}{a} \]

   7. Taylor expanded in k around 0

      \[\leadsto \left(1 + k \cdot \left(99 \cdot k - 10\right)\right) \cdot a \]

   9. Applied rewrites 28.3%

      \[\leadsto \left(1 + k \cdot \left(99 \cdot k - 10\right)\right) \cdot a \]

   11. Applied rewrites 28.3%

       \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(99 \cdot k - 10, k, 1\right) \cdot a \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 4: 52.9% accurate, 0.7× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\frac{a \cdot {k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k} \leq 10^{+160}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{a}{\mathsf{fma}\left(k + 10, k, 1\right)}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(99 \cdot k - 10, k, 1\right) \cdot a\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (a k m)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= (/ (* a (pow k m)) (+ (+ 1.0 (* 10.0 k)) (* k k))) 1e+160)
   (/ a (fma (+ k 10.0) k 1.0))
   (* (fma (- (* 99.0 k) 10.0) k 1.0) a)))

C

double code(double a, double k, double m) {
	double tmp;
	if (((a * pow(k, m)) / ((1.0 + (10.0 * k)) + (k * k))) <= 1e+160) {
		tmp = a / fma((k + 10.0), k, 1.0);
	} else {
		tmp = fma(((99.0 * k) - 10.0), k, 1.0) * a;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Julia

function code(a, k, m)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (Float64(Float64(a * (k ^ m)) / Float64(Float64(1.0 + Float64(10.0 * k)) + Float64(k * k))) <= 1e+160)
		tmp = Float64(a / fma(Float64(k + 10.0), k, 1.0));
	else
		tmp = Float64(fma(Float64(Float64(99.0 * k) - 10.0), k, 1.0) * a);
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

code[a_, k_, m_] := If[LessEqual[N[(N[(a * N[Power[k, m], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / N[(N[(1.0 + N[(10.0 * k), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(k * k), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], 1e+160], N[(a / N[(N[(k + 10.0), $MachinePrecision] * k + 1.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[(N[(N[(99.0 * k), $MachinePrecision] - 10.0), $MachinePrecision] * k + 1.0), $MachinePrecision] * a), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (/.f64 (*.f64 a (pow.f64 k m)) (+.f64 (+.f64 #s(literal 1 binary64) (*.f64 #s(literal 10 binary64) k)) (*.f64 k k))) < 1.00000000000000001e160

   1. Initial program 90.4%

      \[\frac{a \cdot {k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k} \]

   2. Taylor expanded in m around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{a}{1 + \left(10 \cdot k + {k}^{2}\right)}} \]

   4. Applied rewrites 44.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{a}{1 + \mathsf{fma}\left(10, k, {k}^{2}\right)}} \]

   6. Applied rewrites 44.7%

      \[\leadsto \frac{a}{\mathsf{fma}\left(k + 10, \color{blue}{k}, 1\right)} \]

   if 1.00000000000000001e160 < (/.f64 (*.f64 a (pow.f64 k m)) (+.f64 (+.f64 #s(literal 1 binary64) (*.f64 #s(literal 10 binary64) k)) (*.f64 k k)))

   1. Initial program 90.4%

      \[\frac{a \cdot {k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k} \]

   2. Taylor expanded in m around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{a}{1 + \left(10 \cdot k + {k}^{2}\right)}} \]

   4. Applied rewrites 44.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{a}{1 + \mathsf{fma}\left(10, k, {k}^{2}\right)}} \]

   6. Applied rewrites 44.7%

      \[\leadsto \frac{1}{\mathsf{fma}\left(k + 10, k, 1\right)} \cdot \color{blue}{a} \]

   7. Taylor expanded in k around 0

      \[\leadsto \left(1 + k \cdot \left(99 \cdot k - 10\right)\right) \cdot a \]

   9. Applied rewrites 28.3%

      \[\leadsto \left(1 + k \cdot \left(99 \cdot k - 10\right)\right) \cdot a \]

   11. Applied rewrites 28.3%

       \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(99 \cdot k - 10, k, 1\right) \cdot a \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 5: 47.5% accurate, 0.7× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\frac{a \cdot {k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k} \leq 5 \cdot 10^{+304}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{a}{\mathsf{fma}\left(k + 10, k, 1\right)}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;k \cdot \mathsf{fma}\left(-10, a, \frac{a}{k}\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (a k m)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= (/ (* a (pow k m)) (+ (+ 1.0 (* 10.0 k)) (* k k))) 5e+304)
   (/ a (fma (+ k 10.0) k 1.0))
   (* k (fma -10.0 a (/ a k)))))

C

double code(double a, double k, double m) {
	double tmp;
	if (((a * pow(k, m)) / ((1.0 + (10.0 * k)) + (k * k))) <= 5e+304) {
		tmp = a / fma((k + 10.0), k, 1.0);
	} else {
		tmp = k * fma(-10.0, a, (a / k));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Julia

function code(a, k, m)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (Float64(Float64(a * (k ^ m)) / Float64(Float64(1.0 + Float64(10.0 * k)) + Float64(k * k))) <= 5e+304)
		tmp = Float64(a / fma(Float64(k + 10.0), k, 1.0));
	else
		tmp = Float64(k * fma(-10.0, a, Float64(a / k)));
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

code[a_, k_, m_] := If[LessEqual[N[(N[(a * N[Power[k, m], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / N[(N[(1.0 + N[(10.0 * k), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(k * k), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], 5e+304], N[(a / N[(N[(k + 10.0), $MachinePrecision] * k + 1.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(k * N[(-10.0 * a + N[(a / k), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (/.f64 (*.f64 a (pow.f64 k m)) (+.f64 (+.f64 #s(literal 1 binary64) (*.f64 #s(literal 10 binary64) k)) (*.f64 k k))) < 4.9999999999999997e304

   1. Initial program 90.4%

      \[\frac{a \cdot {k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k} \]

   2. Taylor expanded in m around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{a}{1 + \left(10 \cdot k + {k}^{2}\right)}} \]

   4. Applied rewrites 44.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{a}{1 + \mathsf{fma}\left(10, k, {k}^{2}\right)}} \]

   6. Applied rewrites 44.7%

      \[\leadsto \frac{a}{\mathsf{fma}\left(k + 10, \color{blue}{k}, 1\right)} \]

   if 4.9999999999999997e304 < (/.f64 (*.f64 a (pow.f64 k m)) (+.f64 (+.f64 #s(literal 1 binary64) (*.f64 #s(literal 10 binary64) k)) (*.f64 k k)))

   1. Initial program 90.4%

      \[\frac{a \cdot {k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k} \]

   2. Taylor expanded in m around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{a}{1 + \left(10 \cdot k + {k}^{2}\right)}} \]

   4. Applied rewrites 44.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{a}{1 + \mathsf{fma}\left(10, k, {k}^{2}\right)}} \]

   5. Taylor expanded in k around 0

      \[\leadsto a + \color{blue}{-10 \cdot \left(a \cdot k\right)} \]

   7. Applied rewrites 20.3%

      \[\leadsto a + \color{blue}{-10 \cdot \left(a \cdot k\right)} \]

   8. Taylor expanded in k around inf

      \[\leadsto k \cdot \left(-10 \cdot a + \color{blue}{\frac{a}{k}}\right) \]

   10. Applied rewrites 19.8%

       \[\leadsto k \cdot \mathsf{fma}\left(-10, \color{blue}{a}, \frac{a}{k}\right) \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 6: 44.7% accurate, 2.9× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \frac{a}{\mathsf{fma}\left(k + 10, k, 1\right)} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (a k m) :precision binary64 (/ a (fma (+ k 10.0) k 1.0)))

C

double code(double a, double k, double m) {
	return a / fma((k + 10.0), k, 1.0);
}

Julia

function code(a, k, m)
	return Float64(a / fma(Float64(k + 10.0), k, 1.0))
end

Wolfram

code[a_, k_, m_] := N[(a / N[(N[(k + 10.0), $MachinePrecision] * k + 1.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 90.4%

   \[\frac{a \cdot {k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k} \]

2. Taylor expanded in m around 0

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{a}{1 + \left(10 \cdot k + {k}^{2}\right)}} \]

4. Applied rewrites 44.7%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{a}{1 + \mathsf{fma}\left(10, k, {k}^{2}\right)}} \]

6. Applied rewrites 44.7%

   \[\leadsto \frac{a}{\mathsf{fma}\left(k + 10, \color{blue}{k}, 1\right)} \]
7. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 7: 29.5% accurate, 2.6× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;m \leq 3.2 \cdot 10^{+15}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{a}{\mathsf{fma}\left(10, k, 1\right)}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(a \cdot k, -10, a\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (a k m)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= m 3.2e+15) (/ a (fma 10.0 k 1.0)) (fma (* a k) -10.0 a)))

C

double code(double a, double k, double m) {
	double tmp;
	if (m <= 3.2e+15) {
		tmp = a / fma(10.0, k, 1.0);
	} else {
		tmp = fma((a * k), -10.0, a);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Julia

function code(a, k, m)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (m <= 3.2e+15)
		tmp = Float64(a / fma(10.0, k, 1.0));
	else
		tmp = fma(Float64(a * k), -10.0, a);
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

code[a_, k_, m_] := If[LessEqual[m, 3.2e+15], N[(a / N[(10.0 * k + 1.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[(a * k), $MachinePrecision] * -10.0 + a), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if m < 3.2e15

   1. Initial program 90.4%

      \[\frac{a \cdot {k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k} \]

   2. Taylor expanded in m around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{a}{1 + \left(10 \cdot k + {k}^{2}\right)}} \]

   4. Applied rewrites 44.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{a}{1 + \mathsf{fma}\left(10, k, {k}^{2}\right)}} \]

   6. Applied rewrites 44.7%

      \[\leadsto \frac{a}{\mathsf{fma}\left(k + 10, \color{blue}{k}, 1\right)} \]

   7. Taylor expanded in k around 0

      \[\leadsto \frac{a}{\mathsf{fma}\left(10, k, 1\right)} \]

   9. Applied rewrites 27.7%

      \[\leadsto \frac{a}{\mathsf{fma}\left(10, k, 1\right)} \]

   if 3.2e15 < m

   1. Initial program 90.4%

      \[\frac{a \cdot {k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k} \]

   2. Taylor expanded in m around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{a}{1 + \left(10 \cdot k + {k}^{2}\right)}} \]

   4. Applied rewrites 44.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{a}{1 + \mathsf{fma}\left(10, k, {k}^{2}\right)}} \]

   5. Taylor expanded in k around 0

      \[\leadsto a + \color{blue}{-10 \cdot \left(a \cdot k\right)} \]

   7. Applied rewrites 20.3%

      \[\leadsto a + \color{blue}{-10 \cdot \left(a \cdot k\right)} \]

   9. Applied rewrites 20.3%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(a \cdot k, -10, a\right) \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 8: 20.3% accurate, 3.9× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \mathsf{fma}\left(a \cdot k, -10, a\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (a k m) :precision binary64 (fma (* a k) -10.0 a))

C

double code(double a, double k, double m) {
	return fma((a * k), -10.0, a);
}

Julia

function code(a, k, m)
	return fma(Float64(a * k), -10.0, a)
end

Wolfram

code[a_, k_, m_] := N[(N[(a * k), $MachinePrecision] * -10.0 + a), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 90.4%

   \[\frac{a \cdot {k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k} \]

2. Taylor expanded in m around 0

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{a}{1 + \left(10 \cdot k + {k}^{2}\right)}} \]

4. Applied rewrites 44.7%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{a}{1 + \mathsf{fma}\left(10, k, {k}^{2}\right)}} \]

5. Taylor expanded in k around 0

   \[\leadsto a + \color{blue}{-10 \cdot \left(a \cdot k\right)} \]

7. Applied rewrites 20.3%

   \[\leadsto a + \color{blue}{-10 \cdot \left(a \cdot k\right)} \]

9. Applied rewrites 20.3%

   \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(a \cdot k, -10, a\right) \]
10. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 9: 19.4% accurate, 7.9× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \frac{a}{1} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (a k m) :precision binary64 (/ a 1.0))

C

double code(double a, double k, double m) {
	return a / 1.0;
}

Fortran

module fmin_fmax_functions
    implicit none
    private
    public fmax
    public fmin

    interface fmax
        module procedure fmax88
        module procedure fmax44
        module procedure fmax84
        module procedure fmax48
    end interface
    interface fmin
        module procedure fmin88
        module procedure fmin44
        module procedure fmin84
        module procedure fmin48
    end interface
contains
    real(8) function fmax88(x, y) result (res)
        real(8), intent (in) :: x
        real(8), intent (in) :: y
        res = merge(y, merge(x, max(x, y), y /= y), x /= x)
    end function
    real(4) function fmax44(x, y) result (res)
        real(4), intent (in) :: x
        real(4), intent (in) :: y
        res = merge(y, merge(x, max(x, y), y /= y), x /= x)
    end function
    real(8) function fmax84(x, y) result(res)
        real(8), intent (in) :: x
        real(4), intent (in) :: y
        res = merge(dble(y), merge(x, max(x, dble(y)), y /= y), x /= x)
    end function
    real(8) function fmax48(x, y) result(res)
        real(4), intent (in) :: x
        real(8), intent (in) :: y
        res = merge(y, merge(dble(x), max(dble(x), y), y /= y), x /= x)
    end function
    real(8) function fmin88(x, y) result (res)
        real(8), intent (in) :: x
        real(8), intent (in) :: y
        res = merge(y, merge(x, min(x, y), y /= y), x /= x)
    end function
    real(4) function fmin44(x, y) result (res)
        real(4), intent (in) :: x
        real(4), intent (in) :: y
        res = merge(y, merge(x, min(x, y), y /= y), x /= x)
    end function
    real(8) function fmin84(x, y) result(res)
        real(8), intent (in) :: x
        real(4), intent (in) :: y
        res = merge(dble(y), merge(x, min(x, dble(y)), y /= y), x /= x)
    end function
    real(8) function fmin48(x, y) result(res)
        real(4), intent (in) :: x
        real(8), intent (in) :: y
        res = merge(y, merge(dble(x), min(dble(x), y), y /= y), x /= x)
    end function
end module

real(8) function code(a, k, m)
use fmin_fmax_functions
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: k
    real(8), intent (in) :: m
    code = a / 1.0d0
end function

Java

public static double code(double a, double k, double m) {
	return a / 1.0;
}

Python

def code(a, k, m):
	return a / 1.0

Julia

function code(a, k, m)
	return Float64(a / 1.0)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(a, k, m)
	tmp = a / 1.0;
end

Wolfram

code[a_, k_, m_] := N[(a / 1.0), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 90.4%

   \[\frac{a \cdot {k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k} \]

2. Taylor expanded in m around 0

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{a}{1 + \left(10 \cdot k + {k}^{2}\right)}} \]

4. Applied rewrites 44.7%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{a}{1 + \mathsf{fma}\left(10, k, {k}^{2}\right)}} \]

5. Taylor expanded in k around 0

   \[\leadsto \frac{a}{1} \]

7. Applied rewrites 19.4%

   \[\leadsto \frac{a}{1} \]
8. Add Preprocessing

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2025153 
(FPCore (a k m)
  :name "Falkner and Boettcher, Appendix A"
  :precision binary64
  (/ (* a (pow k m)) (+ (+ 1.0 (* 10.0 k)) (* k k))))