VandenBroeck and Keller, Equation (6)

Percentage Accurate: 77.0% → 99.3%

Time: 8.5s

Alternatives: 5

Speedup: 2.7×

Specification

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \pi \cdot \ell - \frac{1}{F \cdot F} \cdot \tan \left(\pi \cdot \ell\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (F l)
 :precision binary64
 (- (* PI l) (* (/ 1.0 (* F F)) (tan (* PI l)))))

C

double code(double F, double l) {
	return (((double) M_PI) * l) - ((1.0 / (F * F)) * tan((((double) M_PI) * l)));
}

Java

public static double code(double F, double l) {
	return (Math.PI * l) - ((1.0 / (F * F)) * Math.tan((Math.PI * l)));
}

Python

def code(F, l):
	return (math.pi * l) - ((1.0 / (F * F)) * math.tan((math.pi * l)))

Julia

function code(F, l)
	return Float64(Float64(pi * l) - Float64(Float64(1.0 / Float64(F * F)) * tan(Float64(pi * l))))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(F, l)
	tmp = (pi * l) - ((1.0 / (F * F)) * tan((pi * l)));
end

Wolfram

code[F_, l_] := N[(N[(Pi * l), $MachinePrecision] - N[(N[(1.0 / N[(F * F), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] * N[Tan[N[(Pi * l), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Initial Program: 77.0% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \pi \cdot \ell - \frac{1}{F \cdot F} \cdot \tan \left(\pi \cdot \ell\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (F l)
 :precision binary64
 (- (* PI l) (* (/ 1.0 (* F F)) (tan (* PI l)))))

C

double code(double F, double l) {
	return (((double) M_PI) * l) - ((1.0 / (F * F)) * tan((((double) M_PI) * l)));
}

Java

public static double code(double F, double l) {
	return (Math.PI * l) - ((1.0 / (F * F)) * Math.tan((Math.PI * l)));
}

Python

def code(F, l):
	return (math.pi * l) - ((1.0 / (F * F)) * math.tan((math.pi * l)))

Julia

function code(F, l)
	return Float64(Float64(pi * l) - Float64(Float64(1.0 / Float64(F * F)) * tan(Float64(pi * l))))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(F, l)
	tmp = (pi * l) - ((1.0 / (F * F)) * tan((pi * l)));
end

Wolfram

code[F_, l_] := N[(N[(Pi * l), $MachinePrecision] - N[(N[(1.0 / N[(F * F), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] * N[Tan[N[(Pi * l), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Alternative 1: 99.3% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} l\_m = \left|\ell\right| \\ l\_s = \mathsf{copysign}\left(1, \ell\right) \\ l\_s \cdot \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;l\_m \leq 1.95 \cdot 10^{+15}:\\ \;\;\;\;\pi \cdot l\_m - \frac{\frac{\tan \left(\pi \cdot l\_m\right)}{F}}{F}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;l\_m \cdot \pi\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

l\_m = (fabs.f64 l)
l\_s = (copysign.f64 #s(literal 1 binary64) l)
(FPCore (l_s F l_m)
 :precision binary64
 (*
  l_s
  (if (<= l_m 1.95e+15)
    (- (* PI l_m) (/ (/ (tan (* PI l_m)) F) F))
    (* l_m PI))))

C

l\_m = fabs(l);
l\_s = copysign(1.0, l);
double code(double l_s, double F, double l_m) {
	double tmp;
	if (l_m <= 1.95e+15) {
		tmp = (((double) M_PI) * l_m) - ((tan((((double) M_PI) * l_m)) / F) / F);
	} else {
		tmp = l_m * ((double) M_PI);
	}
	return l_s * tmp;
}

Java

l\_m = Math.abs(l);
l\_s = Math.copySign(1.0, l);
public static double code(double l_s, double F, double l_m) {
	double tmp;
	if (l_m <= 1.95e+15) {
		tmp = (Math.PI * l_m) - ((Math.tan((Math.PI * l_m)) / F) / F);
	} else {
		tmp = l_m * Math.PI;
	}
	return l_s * tmp;
}

Python

l\_m = math.fabs(l)
l\_s = math.copysign(1.0, l)
def code(l_s, F, l_m):
	tmp = 0
	if l_m <= 1.95e+15:
		tmp = (math.pi * l_m) - ((math.tan((math.pi * l_m)) / F) / F)
	else:
		tmp = l_m * math.pi
	return l_s * tmp

Julia

l\_m = abs(l)
l\_s = copysign(1.0, l)
function code(l_s, F, l_m)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (l_m <= 1.95e+15)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(pi * l_m) - Float64(Float64(tan(Float64(pi * l_m)) / F) / F));
	else
		tmp = Float64(l_m * pi);
	end
	return Float64(l_s * tmp)
end

MATLAB

l\_m = abs(l);
l\_s = sign(l) * abs(1.0);
function tmp_2 = code(l_s, F, l_m)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (l_m <= 1.95e+15)
		tmp = (pi * l_m) - ((tan((pi * l_m)) / F) / F);
	else
		tmp = l_m * pi;
	end
	tmp_2 = l_s * tmp;
end

Wolfram

l\_m = N[Abs[l], $MachinePrecision]
l\_s = N[With[{TMP1 = Abs[1.0], TMP2 = Sign[l]}, TMP1 * If[TMP2 == 0, 1, TMP2]], $MachinePrecision]
code[l$95$s_, F_, l$95$m_] := N[(l$95$s * If[LessEqual[l$95$m, 1.95e+15], N[(N[(Pi * l$95$m), $MachinePrecision] - N[(N[(N[Tan[N[(Pi * l$95$m), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] / F), $MachinePrecision] / F), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(l$95$m * Pi), $MachinePrecision]]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if l < 1.95e15

   1. Initial program 77.0%

      \[\pi \cdot \ell - \frac{1}{F \cdot F} \cdot \tan \left(\pi \cdot \ell\right) \]

   3. Applied rewrites 82.6%

      \[\leadsto \pi \cdot \ell - \color{blue}{\frac{\frac{\tan \left(\pi \cdot \ell\right)}{F}}{F}} \]

   if 1.95e15 < l

   1. Initial program 77.0%

      \[\pi \cdot \ell - \frac{1}{F \cdot F} \cdot \tan \left(\pi \cdot \ell\right) \]

   2. Taylor expanded in F around inf

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\ell \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right)} \]

   4. Applied rewrites 73.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\ell \cdot \pi} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 2: 98.5% accurate, 2.7× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} l\_m = \left|\ell\right| \\ l\_s = \mathsf{copysign}\left(1, \ell\right) \\ l\_s \cdot \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;l\_m \leq 1.9 \cdot 10^{+15}:\\ \;\;\;\;\pi \cdot l\_m - \frac{\pi}{F} \cdot \frac{l\_m}{F}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;l\_m \cdot \pi\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

l\_m = (fabs.f64 l)
l\_s = (copysign.f64 #s(literal 1 binary64) l)
(FPCore (l_s F l_m)
 :precision binary64
 (*
  l_s
  (if (<= l_m 1.9e+15) (- (* PI l_m) (* (/ PI F) (/ l_m F))) (* l_m PI))))

C

l\_m = fabs(l);
l\_s = copysign(1.0, l);
double code(double l_s, double F, double l_m) {
	double tmp;
	if (l_m <= 1.9e+15) {
		tmp = (((double) M_PI) * l_m) - ((((double) M_PI) / F) * (l_m / F));
	} else {
		tmp = l_m * ((double) M_PI);
	}
	return l_s * tmp;
}

Java

l\_m = Math.abs(l);
l\_s = Math.copySign(1.0, l);
public static double code(double l_s, double F, double l_m) {
	double tmp;
	if (l_m <= 1.9e+15) {
		tmp = (Math.PI * l_m) - ((Math.PI / F) * (l_m / F));
	} else {
		tmp = l_m * Math.PI;
	}
	return l_s * tmp;
}

Python

l\_m = math.fabs(l)
l\_s = math.copysign(1.0, l)
def code(l_s, F, l_m):
	tmp = 0
	if l_m <= 1.9e+15:
		tmp = (math.pi * l_m) - ((math.pi / F) * (l_m / F))
	else:
		tmp = l_m * math.pi
	return l_s * tmp

Julia

l\_m = abs(l)
l\_s = copysign(1.0, l)
function code(l_s, F, l_m)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (l_m <= 1.9e+15)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(pi * l_m) - Float64(Float64(pi / F) * Float64(l_m / F)));
	else
		tmp = Float64(l_m * pi);
	end
	return Float64(l_s * tmp)
end

MATLAB

l\_m = abs(l);
l\_s = sign(l) * abs(1.0);
function tmp_2 = code(l_s, F, l_m)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (l_m <= 1.9e+15)
		tmp = (pi * l_m) - ((pi / F) * (l_m / F));
	else
		tmp = l_m * pi;
	end
	tmp_2 = l_s * tmp;
end

Wolfram

l\_m = N[Abs[l], $MachinePrecision]
l\_s = N[With[{TMP1 = Abs[1.0], TMP2 = Sign[l]}, TMP1 * If[TMP2 == 0, 1, TMP2]], $MachinePrecision]
code[l$95$s_, F_, l$95$m_] := N[(l$95$s * If[LessEqual[l$95$m, 1.9e+15], N[(N[(Pi * l$95$m), $MachinePrecision] - N[(N[(Pi / F), $MachinePrecision] * N[(l$95$m / F), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(l$95$m * Pi), $MachinePrecision]]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if l < 1.9e15

   1. Initial program 77.0%

      \[\pi \cdot \ell - \frac{1}{F \cdot F} \cdot \tan \left(\pi \cdot \ell\right) \]

   2. Taylor expanded in l around 0

      \[\leadsto \pi \cdot \ell - \color{blue}{\frac{\ell \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{{F}^{2}}} \]

   4. Applied rewrites 69.5%

      \[\leadsto \pi \cdot \ell - \color{blue}{\frac{\ell \cdot \pi}{{F}^{2}}} \]

   6. Applied rewrites 74.9%

      \[\leadsto \pi \cdot \ell - \frac{\pi}{F} \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{\ell}{F}} \]

   if 1.9e15 < l

   1. Initial program 77.0%

      \[\pi \cdot \ell - \frac{1}{F \cdot F} \cdot \tan \left(\pi \cdot \ell\right) \]

   2. Taylor expanded in F around inf

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\ell \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right)} \]

   4. Applied rewrites 73.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\ell \cdot \pi} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 3: 93.2% accurate, 2.7× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} l\_m = \left|\ell\right| \\ l\_s = \mathsf{copysign}\left(1, \ell\right) \\ l\_s \cdot \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;l\_m \leq 1.9 \cdot 10^{+15}:\\ \;\;\;\;\pi \cdot l\_m - \frac{\pi \cdot l\_m}{F \cdot F}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;l\_m \cdot \pi\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

l\_m = (fabs.f64 l)
l\_s = (copysign.f64 #s(literal 1 binary64) l)
(FPCore (l_s F l_m)
 :precision binary64
 (*
  l_s
  (if (<= l_m 1.9e+15) (- (* PI l_m) (/ (* PI l_m) (* F F))) (* l_m PI))))

C

l\_m = fabs(l);
l\_s = copysign(1.0, l);
double code(double l_s, double F, double l_m) {
	double tmp;
	if (l_m <= 1.9e+15) {
		tmp = (((double) M_PI) * l_m) - ((((double) M_PI) * l_m) / (F * F));
	} else {
		tmp = l_m * ((double) M_PI);
	}
	return l_s * tmp;
}

Java

l\_m = Math.abs(l);
l\_s = Math.copySign(1.0, l);
public static double code(double l_s, double F, double l_m) {
	double tmp;
	if (l_m <= 1.9e+15) {
		tmp = (Math.PI * l_m) - ((Math.PI * l_m) / (F * F));
	} else {
		tmp = l_m * Math.PI;
	}
	return l_s * tmp;
}

Python

l\_m = math.fabs(l)
l\_s = math.copysign(1.0, l)
def code(l_s, F, l_m):
	tmp = 0
	if l_m <= 1.9e+15:
		tmp = (math.pi * l_m) - ((math.pi * l_m) / (F * F))
	else:
		tmp = l_m * math.pi
	return l_s * tmp

Julia

l\_m = abs(l)
l\_s = copysign(1.0, l)
function code(l_s, F, l_m)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (l_m <= 1.9e+15)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(pi * l_m) - Float64(Float64(pi * l_m) / Float64(F * F)));
	else
		tmp = Float64(l_m * pi);
	end
	return Float64(l_s * tmp)
end

MATLAB

l\_m = abs(l);
l\_s = sign(l) * abs(1.0);
function tmp_2 = code(l_s, F, l_m)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (l_m <= 1.9e+15)
		tmp = (pi * l_m) - ((pi * l_m) / (F * F));
	else
		tmp = l_m * pi;
	end
	tmp_2 = l_s * tmp;
end

Wolfram

l\_m = N[Abs[l], $MachinePrecision]
l\_s = N[With[{TMP1 = Abs[1.0], TMP2 = Sign[l]}, TMP1 * If[TMP2 == 0, 1, TMP2]], $MachinePrecision]
code[l$95$s_, F_, l$95$m_] := N[(l$95$s * If[LessEqual[l$95$m, 1.9e+15], N[(N[(Pi * l$95$m), $MachinePrecision] - N[(N[(Pi * l$95$m), $MachinePrecision] / N[(F * F), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(l$95$m * Pi), $MachinePrecision]]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if l < 1.9e15

   1. Initial program 77.0%

      \[\pi \cdot \ell - \frac{1}{F \cdot F} \cdot \tan \left(\pi \cdot \ell\right) \]

   2. Taylor expanded in l around 0

      \[\leadsto \pi \cdot \ell - \color{blue}{\frac{\ell \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{{F}^{2}}} \]

   4. Applied rewrites 69.5%

      \[\leadsto \pi \cdot \ell - \color{blue}{\frac{\ell \cdot \pi}{{F}^{2}}} \]

   6. Applied rewrites 69.5%

      \[\leadsto \pi \cdot \ell - \color{blue}{\frac{\pi \cdot \ell}{F \cdot F}} \]

   if 1.9e15 < l

   1. Initial program 77.0%

      \[\pi \cdot \ell - \frac{1}{F \cdot F} \cdot \tan \left(\pi \cdot \ell\right) \]

   2. Taylor expanded in F around inf

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\ell \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right)} \]

   4. Applied rewrites 73.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\ell \cdot \pi} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 4: 93.2% accurate, 2.7× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} l\_m = \left|\ell\right| \\ l\_s = \mathsf{copysign}\left(1, \ell\right) \\ l\_s \cdot \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;l\_m \leq 1.9 \cdot 10^{+15}:\\ \;\;\;\;\pi \cdot l\_m - \frac{l\_m}{F \cdot F} \cdot \pi\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;l\_m \cdot \pi\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

l\_m = (fabs.f64 l)
l\_s = (copysign.f64 #s(literal 1 binary64) l)
(FPCore (l_s F l_m)
 :precision binary64
 (*
  l_s
  (if (<= l_m 1.9e+15) (- (* PI l_m) (* (/ l_m (* F F)) PI)) (* l_m PI))))

C

l\_m = fabs(l);
l\_s = copysign(1.0, l);
double code(double l_s, double F, double l_m) {
	double tmp;
	if (l_m <= 1.9e+15) {
		tmp = (((double) M_PI) * l_m) - ((l_m / (F * F)) * ((double) M_PI));
	} else {
		tmp = l_m * ((double) M_PI);
	}
	return l_s * tmp;
}

Java

l\_m = Math.abs(l);
l\_s = Math.copySign(1.0, l);
public static double code(double l_s, double F, double l_m) {
	double tmp;
	if (l_m <= 1.9e+15) {
		tmp = (Math.PI * l_m) - ((l_m / (F * F)) * Math.PI);
	} else {
		tmp = l_m * Math.PI;
	}
	return l_s * tmp;
}

Python

l\_m = math.fabs(l)
l\_s = math.copysign(1.0, l)
def code(l_s, F, l_m):
	tmp = 0
	if l_m <= 1.9e+15:
		tmp = (math.pi * l_m) - ((l_m / (F * F)) * math.pi)
	else:
		tmp = l_m * math.pi
	return l_s * tmp

Julia

l\_m = abs(l)
l\_s = copysign(1.0, l)
function code(l_s, F, l_m)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (l_m <= 1.9e+15)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(pi * l_m) - Float64(Float64(l_m / Float64(F * F)) * pi));
	else
		tmp = Float64(l_m * pi);
	end
	return Float64(l_s * tmp)
end

MATLAB

l\_m = abs(l);
l\_s = sign(l) * abs(1.0);
function tmp_2 = code(l_s, F, l_m)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (l_m <= 1.9e+15)
		tmp = (pi * l_m) - ((l_m / (F * F)) * pi);
	else
		tmp = l_m * pi;
	end
	tmp_2 = l_s * tmp;
end

Wolfram

l\_m = N[Abs[l], $MachinePrecision]
l\_s = N[With[{TMP1 = Abs[1.0], TMP2 = Sign[l]}, TMP1 * If[TMP2 == 0, 1, TMP2]], $MachinePrecision]
code[l$95$s_, F_, l$95$m_] := N[(l$95$s * If[LessEqual[l$95$m, 1.9e+15], N[(N[(Pi * l$95$m), $MachinePrecision] - N[(N[(l$95$m / N[(F * F), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] * Pi), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(l$95$m * Pi), $MachinePrecision]]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if l < 1.9e15

   1. Initial program 77.0%

      \[\pi \cdot \ell - \frac{1}{F \cdot F} \cdot \tan \left(\pi \cdot \ell\right) \]

   2. Taylor expanded in l around 0

      \[\leadsto \pi \cdot \ell - \color{blue}{\frac{\ell \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{{F}^{2}}} \]

   4. Applied rewrites 69.5%

      \[\leadsto \pi \cdot \ell - \color{blue}{\frac{\ell \cdot \pi}{{F}^{2}}} \]

   6. Applied rewrites 69.5%

      \[\leadsto \pi \cdot \ell - \frac{\ell}{F \cdot F} \cdot \color{blue}{\pi} \]

   if 1.9e15 < l

   1. Initial program 77.0%

      \[\pi \cdot \ell - \frac{1}{F \cdot F} \cdot \tan \left(\pi \cdot \ell\right) \]

   2. Taylor expanded in F around inf

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\ell \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right)} \]

   4. Applied rewrites 73.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\ell \cdot \pi} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 5: 73.9% accurate, 13.6× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} l\_m = \left|\ell\right| \\ l\_s = \mathsf{copysign}\left(1, \ell\right) \\ l\_s \cdot \left(l\_m \cdot \pi\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

l\_m = (fabs.f64 l)
l\_s = (copysign.f64 #s(literal 1 binary64) l)
(FPCore (l_s F l_m) :precision binary64 (* l_s (* l_m PI)))

C

l\_m = fabs(l);
l\_s = copysign(1.0, l);
double code(double l_s, double F, double l_m) {
	return l_s * (l_m * ((double) M_PI));
}

Java

l\_m = Math.abs(l);
l\_s = Math.copySign(1.0, l);
public static double code(double l_s, double F, double l_m) {
	return l_s * (l_m * Math.PI);
}

Python

l\_m = math.fabs(l)
l\_s = math.copysign(1.0, l)
def code(l_s, F, l_m):
	return l_s * (l_m * math.pi)

Julia

l\_m = abs(l)
l\_s = copysign(1.0, l)
function code(l_s, F, l_m)
	return Float64(l_s * Float64(l_m * pi))
end

MATLAB

l\_m = abs(l);
l\_s = sign(l) * abs(1.0);
function tmp = code(l_s, F, l_m)
	tmp = l_s * (l_m * pi);
end

Wolfram

l\_m = N[Abs[l], $MachinePrecision]
l\_s = N[With[{TMP1 = Abs[1.0], TMP2 = Sign[l]}, TMP1 * If[TMP2 == 0, 1, TMP2]], $MachinePrecision]
code[l$95$s_, F_, l$95$m_] := N[(l$95$s * N[(l$95$m * Pi), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 77.0%

   \[\pi \cdot \ell - \frac{1}{F \cdot F} \cdot \tan \left(\pi \cdot \ell\right) \]

2. Taylor expanded in F around inf

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\ell \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right)} \]

4. Applied rewrites 73.9%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\ell \cdot \pi} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2025153 
(FPCore (F l)
  :name "VandenBroeck and Keller, Equation (6)"
  :precision binary64
  (- (* PI l) (* (/ 1.0 (* F F)) (tan (* PI l)))))