Logistic function from Lakshay Garg

Percentage Accurate: 54.0% → 100.0%
Time: 9.1s
Alternatives: 6
Speedup: 1.3×

Specification

?
\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \frac{2}{1 + e^{-2 \cdot x}} - 1 \end{array} \]
(FPCore (x) :precision binary64 (- (/ 2.0 (+ 1.0 (exp (* -2.0 x)))) 1.0))
double code(double x) {
	return (2.0 / (1.0 + exp((-2.0 * x)))) - 1.0;
}
module fmin_fmax_functions
    implicit none
    private
    public fmax
    public fmin

    interface fmax
        module procedure fmax88
        module procedure fmax44
        module procedure fmax84
        module procedure fmax48
    end interface
    interface fmin
        module procedure fmin88
        module procedure fmin44
        module procedure fmin84
        module procedure fmin48
    end interface
contains
    real(8) function fmax88(x, y) result (res)
        real(8), intent (in) :: x
        real(8), intent (in) :: y
        res = merge(y, merge(x, max(x, y), y /= y), x /= x)
    end function
    real(4) function fmax44(x, y) result (res)
        real(4), intent (in) :: x
        real(4), intent (in) :: y
        res = merge(y, merge(x, max(x, y), y /= y), x /= x)
    end function
    real(8) function fmax84(x, y) result(res)
        real(8), intent (in) :: x
        real(4), intent (in) :: y
        res = merge(dble(y), merge(x, max(x, dble(y)), y /= y), x /= x)
    end function
    real(8) function fmax48(x, y) result(res)
        real(4), intent (in) :: x
        real(8), intent (in) :: y
        res = merge(y, merge(dble(x), max(dble(x), y), y /= y), x /= x)
    end function
    real(8) function fmin88(x, y) result (res)
        real(8), intent (in) :: x
        real(8), intent (in) :: y
        res = merge(y, merge(x, min(x, y), y /= y), x /= x)
    end function
    real(4) function fmin44(x, y) result (res)
        real(4), intent (in) :: x
        real(4), intent (in) :: y
        res = merge(y, merge(x, min(x, y), y /= y), x /= x)
    end function
    real(8) function fmin84(x, y) result(res)
        real(8), intent (in) :: x
        real(4), intent (in) :: y
        res = merge(dble(y), merge(x, min(x, dble(y)), y /= y), x /= x)
    end function
    real(8) function fmin48(x, y) result(res)
        real(4), intent (in) :: x
        real(8), intent (in) :: y
        res = merge(y, merge(dble(x), min(dble(x), y), y /= y), x /= x)
    end function
end module

real(8) function code(x)
use fmin_fmax_functions
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    code = (2.0d0 / (1.0d0 + exp(((-2.0d0) * x)))) - 1.0d0
end function
public static double code(double x) {
	return (2.0 / (1.0 + Math.exp((-2.0 * x)))) - 1.0;
}
def code(x):
	return (2.0 / (1.0 + math.exp((-2.0 * x)))) - 1.0
function code(x)
	return Float64(Float64(2.0 / Float64(1.0 + exp(Float64(-2.0 * x)))) - 1.0)
end
function tmp = code(x)
	tmp = (2.0 / (1.0 + exp((-2.0 * x)))) - 1.0;
end
code[x_] := N[(N[(2.0 / N[(1.0 + N[Exp[N[(-2.0 * x), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - 1.0), $MachinePrecision]
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\frac{2}{1 + e^{-2 \cdot x}} - 1
\end{array}

Local Percentage Accuracy vs ?

The average percentage accuracy by input value. Horizontal axis shows value of an input variable; the variable is choosen in the title. Vertical axis is accuracy; higher is better. Red represent the original program, while blue represents Herbie's suggestion. These can be toggled with buttons below the plot. The line is an average while dots represent individual samples.

Accuracy vs Speed?

Herbie found 6 alternatives:

AlternativeAccuracySpeedup
The accuracy (vertical axis) and speed (horizontal axis) of each alternatives. Up and to the right is better. The red square shows the initial program, and each blue circle shows an alternative.The line shows the best available speed-accuracy tradeoffs.

Initial Program: 54.0% accurate, 1.0× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \frac{2}{1 + e^{-2 \cdot x}} - 1 \end{array} \]
(FPCore (x) :precision binary64 (- (/ 2.0 (+ 1.0 (exp (* -2.0 x)))) 1.0))
double code(double x) {
	return (2.0 / (1.0 + exp((-2.0 * x)))) - 1.0;
}
module fmin_fmax_functions
    implicit none
    private
    public fmax
    public fmin

    interface fmax
        module procedure fmax88
        module procedure fmax44
        module procedure fmax84
        module procedure fmax48
    end interface
    interface fmin
        module procedure fmin88
        module procedure fmin44
        module procedure fmin84
        module procedure fmin48
    end interface
contains
    real(8) function fmax88(x, y) result (res)
        real(8), intent (in) :: x
        real(8), intent (in) :: y
        res = merge(y, merge(x, max(x, y), y /= y), x /= x)
    end function
    real(4) function fmax44(x, y) result (res)
        real(4), intent (in) :: x
        real(4), intent (in) :: y
        res = merge(y, merge(x, max(x, y), y /= y), x /= x)
    end function
    real(8) function fmax84(x, y) result(res)
        real(8), intent (in) :: x
        real(4), intent (in) :: y
        res = merge(dble(y), merge(x, max(x, dble(y)), y /= y), x /= x)
    end function
    real(8) function fmax48(x, y) result(res)
        real(4), intent (in) :: x
        real(8), intent (in) :: y
        res = merge(y, merge(dble(x), max(dble(x), y), y /= y), x /= x)
    end function
    real(8) function fmin88(x, y) result (res)
        real(8), intent (in) :: x
        real(8), intent (in) :: y
        res = merge(y, merge(x, min(x, y), y /= y), x /= x)
    end function
    real(4) function fmin44(x, y) result (res)
        real(4), intent (in) :: x
        real(4), intent (in) :: y
        res = merge(y, merge(x, min(x, y), y /= y), x /= x)
    end function
    real(8) function fmin84(x, y) result(res)
        real(8), intent (in) :: x
        real(4), intent (in) :: y
        res = merge(dble(y), merge(x, min(x, dble(y)), y /= y), x /= x)
    end function
    real(8) function fmin48(x, y) result(res)
        real(4), intent (in) :: x
        real(8), intent (in) :: y
        res = merge(y, merge(dble(x), min(dble(x), y), y /= y), x /= x)
    end function
end module

real(8) function code(x)
use fmin_fmax_functions
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    code = (2.0d0 / (1.0d0 + exp(((-2.0d0) * x)))) - 1.0d0
end function
public static double code(double x) {
	return (2.0 / (1.0 + Math.exp((-2.0 * x)))) - 1.0;
}
def code(x):
	return (2.0 / (1.0 + math.exp((-2.0 * x)))) - 1.0
function code(x)
	return Float64(Float64(2.0 / Float64(1.0 + exp(Float64(-2.0 * x)))) - 1.0)
end
function tmp = code(x)
	tmp = (2.0 / (1.0 + exp((-2.0 * x)))) - 1.0;
end
code[x_] := N[(N[(2.0 / N[(1.0 + N[Exp[N[(-2.0 * x), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - 1.0), $MachinePrecision]
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\frac{2}{1 + e^{-2 \cdot x}} - 1
\end{array}

Alternative 1: 100.0% accurate, 0.7× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_0 := \mathsf{expm1}\left(-2 \cdot x\right)\\ \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -10000:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{2}{t\_0 + 2} - 1\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{t\_0}{\left(-t\_0\right) - 2}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]
(FPCore (x)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_0 (expm1 (* -2.0 x))))
   (if (<= x -10000.0) (- (/ 2.0 (+ t_0 2.0)) 1.0) (/ t_0 (- (- t_0) 2.0)))))
double code(double x) {
	double t_0 = expm1((-2.0 * x));
	double tmp;
	if (x <= -10000.0) {
		tmp = (2.0 / (t_0 + 2.0)) - 1.0;
	} else {
		tmp = t_0 / (-t_0 - 2.0);
	}
	return tmp;
}
public static double code(double x) {
	double t_0 = Math.expm1((-2.0 * x));
	double tmp;
	if (x <= -10000.0) {
		tmp = (2.0 / (t_0 + 2.0)) - 1.0;
	} else {
		tmp = t_0 / (-t_0 - 2.0);
	}
	return tmp;
}
def code(x):
	t_0 = math.expm1((-2.0 * x))
	tmp = 0
	if x <= -10000.0:
		tmp = (2.0 / (t_0 + 2.0)) - 1.0
	else:
		tmp = t_0 / (-t_0 - 2.0)
	return tmp
function code(x)
	t_0 = expm1(Float64(-2.0 * x))
	tmp = 0.0
	if (x <= -10000.0)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(2.0 / Float64(t_0 + 2.0)) - 1.0);
	else
		tmp = Float64(t_0 / Float64(Float64(-t_0) - 2.0));
	end
	return tmp
end
code[x_] := Block[{t$95$0 = N[(Exp[N[(-2.0 * x), $MachinePrecision]] - 1), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[x, -10000.0], N[(N[(2.0 / N[(t$95$0 + 2.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - 1.0), $MachinePrecision], N[(t$95$0 / N[((-t$95$0) - 2.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]]
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\begin{array}{l}
t_0 := \mathsf{expm1}\left(-2 \cdot x\right)\\
\mathbf{if}\;x \leq -10000:\\
\;\;\;\;\frac{2}{t\_0 + 2} - 1\\

\mathbf{else}:\\
\;\;\;\;\frac{t\_0}{\left(-t\_0\right) - 2}\\


\end{array}
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Split input into 2 regimes
  2. if x < -1e4

    1. Initial program 54.0%

      \[\frac{2}{1 + e^{-2 \cdot x}} - 1 \]
    2. Applied rewrites54.0%

      \[\leadsto \frac{2}{\color{blue}{\left(1 + \mathsf{expm1}\left(-2 \cdot x\right)\right) + 1}} - 1 \]
    3. Applied rewrites54.0%

      \[\leadsto \frac{2}{\color{blue}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(-2 \cdot x\right) + 2}} - 1 \]

    if -1e4 < x

    1. Initial program 54.0%

      \[\frac{2}{1 + e^{-2 \cdot x}} - 1 \]
    2. Applied rewrites76.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{\mathsf{expm1}\left(-2 \cdot x\right)}{\left(\left(-1\right) - \mathsf{expm1}\left(-2 \cdot x\right)\right) - 1}} \]
    3. Applied rewrites76.0%

      \[\leadsto \frac{\mathsf{expm1}\left(-2 \cdot x\right)}{\color{blue}{\left(-\mathsf{expm1}\left(-2 \cdot x\right)\right) - 2}} \]
  3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
  4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 2: 99.9% accurate, 0.8× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_0 := \frac{2}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(-2 \cdot x\right) + 2} - 1\\ \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -0.00082:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_0\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \leq 0.0009:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(x \cdot -0.3333333333333333, x, 1\right) \cdot x\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_0\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]
(FPCore (x)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_0 (- (/ 2.0 (+ (expm1 (* -2.0 x)) 2.0)) 1.0)))
   (if (<= x -0.00082)
     t_0
     (if (<= x 0.0009) (* (fma (* x -0.3333333333333333) x 1.0) x) t_0))))
double code(double x) {
	double t_0 = (2.0 / (expm1((-2.0 * x)) + 2.0)) - 1.0;
	double tmp;
	if (x <= -0.00082) {
		tmp = t_0;
	} else if (x <= 0.0009) {
		tmp = fma((x * -0.3333333333333333), x, 1.0) * x;
	} else {
		tmp = t_0;
	}
	return tmp;
}
function code(x)
	t_0 = Float64(Float64(2.0 / Float64(expm1(Float64(-2.0 * x)) + 2.0)) - 1.0)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (x <= -0.00082)
		tmp = t_0;
	elseif (x <= 0.0009)
		tmp = Float64(fma(Float64(x * -0.3333333333333333), x, 1.0) * x);
	else
		tmp = t_0;
	end
	return tmp
end
code[x_] := Block[{t$95$0 = N[(N[(2.0 / N[(N[(Exp[N[(-2.0 * x), $MachinePrecision]] - 1), $MachinePrecision] + 2.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - 1.0), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[x, -0.00082], t$95$0, If[LessEqual[x, 0.0009], N[(N[(N[(x * -0.3333333333333333), $MachinePrecision] * x + 1.0), $MachinePrecision] * x), $MachinePrecision], t$95$0]]]
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\begin{array}{l}
t_0 := \frac{2}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(-2 \cdot x\right) + 2} - 1\\
\mathbf{if}\;x \leq -0.00082:\\
\;\;\;\;t\_0\\

\mathbf{elif}\;x \leq 0.0009:\\
\;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(x \cdot -0.3333333333333333, x, 1\right) \cdot x\\

\mathbf{else}:\\
\;\;\;\;t\_0\\


\end{array}
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Split input into 2 regimes
  2. if x < -8.1999999999999998e-4 or 8.9999999999999998e-4 < x

    1. Initial program 54.0%

      \[\frac{2}{1 + e^{-2 \cdot x}} - 1 \]
    2. Applied rewrites54.0%

      \[\leadsto \frac{2}{\color{blue}{\left(1 + \mathsf{expm1}\left(-2 \cdot x\right)\right) + 1}} - 1 \]
    3. Applied rewrites54.0%

      \[\leadsto \frac{2}{\color{blue}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(-2 \cdot x\right) + 2}} - 1 \]

    if -8.1999999999999998e-4 < x < 8.9999999999999998e-4

    1. Initial program 54.0%

      \[\frac{2}{1 + e^{-2 \cdot x}} - 1 \]
    2. Applied rewrites76.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{\mathsf{expm1}\left(-2 \cdot x\right)}{\left(\left(-1\right) - \mathsf{expm1}\left(-2 \cdot x\right)\right) - 1}} \]
    3. Taylor expanded in x around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(1 + \frac{-1}{3} \cdot {x}^{2}\right)} \]
    4. Applied rewrites50.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(1 + -0.3333333333333333 \cdot {x}^{2}\right)} \]
    5. Applied rewrites50.3%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x \cdot -0.3333333333333333, x, 1\right) \cdot \color{blue}{x} \]
  3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
  4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 3: 78.0% accurate, 0.6× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;1 + e^{-2 \cdot x} \leq 2.0001:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{\mathsf{expm1}\left(-2 \cdot x\right)}{-2}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{2}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x - \left(2 - x\right), x, 2\right)} - 1\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]
(FPCore (x)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= (+ 1.0 (exp (* -2.0 x))) 2.0001)
   (/ (expm1 (* -2.0 x)) -2.0)
   (- (/ 2.0 (fma (- x (- 2.0 x)) x 2.0)) 1.0)))
double code(double x) {
	double tmp;
	if ((1.0 + exp((-2.0 * x))) <= 2.0001) {
		tmp = expm1((-2.0 * x)) / -2.0;
	} else {
		tmp = (2.0 / fma((x - (2.0 - x)), x, 2.0)) - 1.0;
	}
	return tmp;
}
function code(x)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (Float64(1.0 + exp(Float64(-2.0 * x))) <= 2.0001)
		tmp = Float64(expm1(Float64(-2.0 * x)) / -2.0);
	else
		tmp = Float64(Float64(2.0 / fma(Float64(x - Float64(2.0 - x)), x, 2.0)) - 1.0);
	end
	return tmp
end
code[x_] := If[LessEqual[N[(1.0 + N[Exp[N[(-2.0 * x), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], 2.0001], N[(N[(Exp[N[(-2.0 * x), $MachinePrecision]] - 1), $MachinePrecision] / -2.0), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[(2.0 / N[(N[(x - N[(2.0 - x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] * x + 2.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - 1.0), $MachinePrecision]]
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\begin{array}{l}
\mathbf{if}\;1 + e^{-2 \cdot x} \leq 2.0001:\\
\;\;\;\;\frac{\mathsf{expm1}\left(-2 \cdot x\right)}{-2}\\

\mathbf{else}:\\
\;\;\;\;\frac{2}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x - \left(2 - x\right), x, 2\right)} - 1\\


\end{array}
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Split input into 2 regimes
  2. if (+.f64 #s(literal 1 binary64) (exp.f64 (*.f64 #s(literal -2 binary64) x))) < 2.00010000000000021

    1. Initial program 54.0%

      \[\frac{2}{1 + e^{-2 \cdot x}} - 1 \]
    2. Applied rewrites76.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{\mathsf{expm1}\left(-2 \cdot x\right)}{\left(\left(-1\right) - \mathsf{expm1}\left(-2 \cdot x\right)\right) - 1}} \]
    3. Taylor expanded in x around 0

      \[\leadsto \frac{\mathsf{expm1}\left(-2 \cdot x\right)}{\color{blue}{-2}} \]
    4. Applied rewrites54.7%

      \[\leadsto \frac{\mathsf{expm1}\left(-2 \cdot x\right)}{\color{blue}{-2}} \]

    if 2.00010000000000021 < (+.f64 #s(literal 1 binary64) (exp.f64 (*.f64 #s(literal -2 binary64) x)))

    1. Initial program 54.0%

      \[\frac{2}{1 + e^{-2 \cdot x}} - 1 \]
    2. Taylor expanded in x around 0

      \[\leadsto \frac{2}{\color{blue}{2 + x \cdot \left(2 \cdot x - 2\right)}} - 1 \]
    3. Applied rewrites28.1%

      \[\leadsto \frac{2}{\color{blue}{2 + x \cdot \left(2 \cdot x - 2\right)}} - 1 \]
    4. Applied rewrites28.1%

      \[\leadsto \frac{2}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x - \left(2 - x\right), \color{blue}{x}, 2\right)} - 1 \]
  3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
  4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 4: 77.7% accurate, 1.3× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -1.8 \cdot 10^{-8}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{2}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, -2, 2\right)} - 1\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{\mathsf{expm1}\left(-2 \cdot x\right)}{-2}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]
(FPCore (x)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= x -1.8e-8)
   (- (/ 2.0 (fma x -2.0 2.0)) 1.0)
   (/ (expm1 (* -2.0 x)) -2.0)))
double code(double x) {
	double tmp;
	if (x <= -1.8e-8) {
		tmp = (2.0 / fma(x, -2.0, 2.0)) - 1.0;
	} else {
		tmp = expm1((-2.0 * x)) / -2.0;
	}
	return tmp;
}
function code(x)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (x <= -1.8e-8)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(2.0 / fma(x, -2.0, 2.0)) - 1.0);
	else
		tmp = Float64(expm1(Float64(-2.0 * x)) / -2.0);
	end
	return tmp
end
code[x_] := If[LessEqual[x, -1.8e-8], N[(N[(2.0 / N[(x * -2.0 + 2.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - 1.0), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[(Exp[N[(-2.0 * x), $MachinePrecision]] - 1), $MachinePrecision] / -2.0), $MachinePrecision]]
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\begin{array}{l}
\mathbf{if}\;x \leq -1.8 \cdot 10^{-8}:\\
\;\;\;\;\frac{2}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, -2, 2\right)} - 1\\

\mathbf{else}:\\
\;\;\;\;\frac{\mathsf{expm1}\left(-2 \cdot x\right)}{-2}\\


\end{array}
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Split input into 2 regimes
  2. if x < -1.79999999999999991e-8

    1. Initial program 54.0%

      \[\frac{2}{1 + e^{-2 \cdot x}} - 1 \]
    2. Taylor expanded in x around 0

      \[\leadsto \frac{2}{\color{blue}{2 + -2 \cdot x}} - 1 \]
    3. Applied rewrites27.7%

      \[\leadsto \frac{2}{\color{blue}{2 + -2 \cdot x}} - 1 \]
    4. Applied rewrites27.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{2}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, -2, 2\right)}} - 1 \]

    if -1.79999999999999991e-8 < x

    1. Initial program 54.0%

      \[\frac{2}{1 + e^{-2 \cdot x}} - 1 \]
    2. Applied rewrites76.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{\mathsf{expm1}\left(-2 \cdot x\right)}{\left(\left(-1\right) - \mathsf{expm1}\left(-2 \cdot x\right)\right) - 1}} \]
    3. Taylor expanded in x around 0

      \[\leadsto \frac{\mathsf{expm1}\left(-2 \cdot x\right)}{\color{blue}{-2}} \]
    4. Applied rewrites54.7%

      \[\leadsto \frac{\mathsf{expm1}\left(-2 \cdot x\right)}{\color{blue}{-2}} \]
  3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
  4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 5: 74.7% accurate, 1.2× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;-2 \cdot x \leq 0.002:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{2}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, -2, 2\right)} - 1\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]
(FPCore (x)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= (* -2.0 x) 0.002) x (- (/ 2.0 (fma x -2.0 2.0)) 1.0)))
double code(double x) {
	double tmp;
	if ((-2.0 * x) <= 0.002) {
		tmp = x;
	} else {
		tmp = (2.0 / fma(x, -2.0, 2.0)) - 1.0;
	}
	return tmp;
}
function code(x)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (Float64(-2.0 * x) <= 0.002)
		tmp = x;
	else
		tmp = Float64(Float64(2.0 / fma(x, -2.0, 2.0)) - 1.0);
	end
	return tmp
end
code[x_] := If[LessEqual[N[(-2.0 * x), $MachinePrecision], 0.002], x, N[(N[(2.0 / N[(x * -2.0 + 2.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - 1.0), $MachinePrecision]]
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\begin{array}{l}
\mathbf{if}\;-2 \cdot x \leq 0.002:\\
\;\;\;\;x\\

\mathbf{else}:\\
\;\;\;\;\frac{2}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, -2, 2\right)} - 1\\


\end{array}
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Split input into 2 regimes
  2. if (*.f64 #s(literal -2 binary64) x) < 2e-3

    1. Initial program 54.0%

      \[\frac{2}{1 + e^{-2 \cdot x}} - 1 \]
    2. Taylor expanded in x around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} \]
    3. Applied rewrites52.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} \]

    if 2e-3 < (*.f64 #s(literal -2 binary64) x)

    1. Initial program 54.0%

      \[\frac{2}{1 + e^{-2 \cdot x}} - 1 \]
    2. Taylor expanded in x around 0

      \[\leadsto \frac{2}{\color{blue}{2 + -2 \cdot x}} - 1 \]
    3. Applied rewrites27.7%

      \[\leadsto \frac{2}{\color{blue}{2 + -2 \cdot x}} - 1 \]
    4. Applied rewrites27.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{2}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, -2, 2\right)}} - 1 \]
  3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
  4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 6: 52.3% accurate, 22.8× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x \end{array} \]
(FPCore (x) :precision binary64 x)
double code(double x) {
	return x;
}
module fmin_fmax_functions
    implicit none
    private
    public fmax
    public fmin

    interface fmax
        module procedure fmax88
        module procedure fmax44
        module procedure fmax84
        module procedure fmax48
    end interface
    interface fmin
        module procedure fmin88
        module procedure fmin44
        module procedure fmin84
        module procedure fmin48
    end interface
contains
    real(8) function fmax88(x, y) result (res)
        real(8), intent (in) :: x
        real(8), intent (in) :: y
        res = merge(y, merge(x, max(x, y), y /= y), x /= x)
    end function
    real(4) function fmax44(x, y) result (res)
        real(4), intent (in) :: x
        real(4), intent (in) :: y
        res = merge(y, merge(x, max(x, y), y /= y), x /= x)
    end function
    real(8) function fmax84(x, y) result(res)
        real(8), intent (in) :: x
        real(4), intent (in) :: y
        res = merge(dble(y), merge(x, max(x, dble(y)), y /= y), x /= x)
    end function
    real(8) function fmax48(x, y) result(res)
        real(4), intent (in) :: x
        real(8), intent (in) :: y
        res = merge(y, merge(dble(x), max(dble(x), y), y /= y), x /= x)
    end function
    real(8) function fmin88(x, y) result (res)
        real(8), intent (in) :: x
        real(8), intent (in) :: y
        res = merge(y, merge(x, min(x, y), y /= y), x /= x)
    end function
    real(4) function fmin44(x, y) result (res)
        real(4), intent (in) :: x
        real(4), intent (in) :: y
        res = merge(y, merge(x, min(x, y), y /= y), x /= x)
    end function
    real(8) function fmin84(x, y) result(res)
        real(8), intent (in) :: x
        real(4), intent (in) :: y
        res = merge(dble(y), merge(x, min(x, dble(y)), y /= y), x /= x)
    end function
    real(8) function fmin48(x, y) result(res)
        real(4), intent (in) :: x
        real(8), intent (in) :: y
        res = merge(y, merge(dble(x), min(dble(x), y), y /= y), x /= x)
    end function
end module

real(8) function code(x)
use fmin_fmax_functions
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    code = x
end function
public static double code(double x) {
	return x;
}
def code(x):
	return x
function code(x)
	return x
end
function tmp = code(x)
	tmp = x;
end
code[x_] := x
\begin{array}{l}

\\
x
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Initial program 54.0%

    \[\frac{2}{1 + e^{-2 \cdot x}} - 1 \]
  2. Taylor expanded in x around 0

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} \]
  3. Applied rewrites52.3%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} \]
  4. Add Preprocessing

Reproduce

?
herbie shell --seed 2025153 
(FPCore (x)
  :name "Logistic function from Lakshay Garg"
  :precision binary64
  (- (/ 2.0 (+ 1.0 (exp (* -2.0 x)))) 1.0))