VandenBroeck and Keller, Equation (20)

Percentage Accurate: 6.9% → 99.1%

Time: 13.7s

Alternatives: 4

Speedup: 4.9×

• could not determine a ground truth

  1. f = 1450689000.292252

Specification

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_0 := \frac{\pi}{4} \cdot f\\ t_1 := e^{t\_0}\\ t_2 := e^{-t\_0}\\ -\frac{1}{\frac{\pi}{4}} \cdot \log \left(\frac{t\_1 + t\_2}{t\_1 - t\_2}\right) \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (f)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_0 (* (/ PI 4.0) f)) (t_1 (exp t_0)) (t_2 (exp (- t_0))))
   (- (* (/ 1.0 (/ PI 4.0)) (log (/ (+ t_1 t_2) (- t_1 t_2)))))))

C

double code(double f) {
	double t_0 = (((double) M_PI) / 4.0) * f;
	double t_1 = exp(t_0);
	double t_2 = exp(-t_0);
	return -((1.0 / (((double) M_PI) / 4.0)) * log(((t_1 + t_2) / (t_1 - t_2))));
}

Java

public static double code(double f) {
	double t_0 = (Math.PI / 4.0) * f;
	double t_1 = Math.exp(t_0);
	double t_2 = Math.exp(-t_0);
	return -((1.0 / (Math.PI / 4.0)) * Math.log(((t_1 + t_2) / (t_1 - t_2))));
}

Python

def code(f):
	t_0 = (math.pi / 4.0) * f
	t_1 = math.exp(t_0)
	t_2 = math.exp(-t_0)
	return -((1.0 / (math.pi / 4.0)) * math.log(((t_1 + t_2) / (t_1 - t_2))))

Julia

function code(f)
	t_0 = Float64(Float64(pi / 4.0) * f)
	t_1 = exp(t_0)
	t_2 = exp(Float64(-t_0))
	return Float64(-Float64(Float64(1.0 / Float64(pi / 4.0)) * log(Float64(Float64(t_1 + t_2) / Float64(t_1 - t_2)))))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(f)
	t_0 = (pi / 4.0) * f;
	t_1 = exp(t_0);
	t_2 = exp(-t_0);
	tmp = -((1.0 / (pi / 4.0)) * log(((t_1 + t_2) / (t_1 - t_2))));
end

Wolfram

code[f_] := Block[{t$95$0 = N[(N[(Pi / 4.0), $MachinePrecision] * f), $MachinePrecision]}, Block[{t$95$1 = N[Exp[t$95$0], $MachinePrecision]}, Block[{t$95$2 = N[Exp[(-t$95$0)], $MachinePrecision]}, (-N[(N[(1.0 / N[(Pi / 4.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] * N[Log[N[(N[(t$95$1 + t$95$2), $MachinePrecision] / N[(t$95$1 - t$95$2), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision])]]]

Initial Program: 6.9% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_0 := \frac{\pi}{4} \cdot f\\ t_1 := e^{t\_0}\\ t_2 := e^{-t\_0}\\ -\frac{1}{\frac{\pi}{4}} \cdot \log \left(\frac{t\_1 + t\_2}{t\_1 - t\_2}\right) \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (f)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_0 (* (/ PI 4.0) f)) (t_1 (exp t_0)) (t_2 (exp (- t_0))))
   (- (* (/ 1.0 (/ PI 4.0)) (log (/ (+ t_1 t_2) (- t_1 t_2)))))))

C

double code(double f) {
	double t_0 = (((double) M_PI) / 4.0) * f;
	double t_1 = exp(t_0);
	double t_2 = exp(-t_0);
	return -((1.0 / (((double) M_PI) / 4.0)) * log(((t_1 + t_2) / (t_1 - t_2))));
}

Java

public static double code(double f) {
	double t_0 = (Math.PI / 4.0) * f;
	double t_1 = Math.exp(t_0);
	double t_2 = Math.exp(-t_0);
	return -((1.0 / (Math.PI / 4.0)) * Math.log(((t_1 + t_2) / (t_1 - t_2))));
}

Python

def code(f):
	t_0 = (math.pi / 4.0) * f
	t_1 = math.exp(t_0)
	t_2 = math.exp(-t_0)
	return -((1.0 / (math.pi / 4.0)) * math.log(((t_1 + t_2) / (t_1 - t_2))))

Julia

function code(f)
	t_0 = Float64(Float64(pi / 4.0) * f)
	t_1 = exp(t_0)
	t_2 = exp(Float64(-t_0))
	return Float64(-Float64(Float64(1.0 / Float64(pi / 4.0)) * log(Float64(Float64(t_1 + t_2) / Float64(t_1 - t_2)))))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(f)
	t_0 = (pi / 4.0) * f;
	t_1 = exp(t_0);
	t_2 = exp(-t_0);
	tmp = -((1.0 / (pi / 4.0)) * log(((t_1 + t_2) / (t_1 - t_2))));
end

Wolfram

code[f_] := Block[{t$95$0 = N[(N[(Pi / 4.0), $MachinePrecision] * f), $MachinePrecision]}, Block[{t$95$1 = N[Exp[t$95$0], $MachinePrecision]}, Block[{t$95$2 = N[Exp[(-t$95$0)], $MachinePrecision]}, (-N[(N[(1.0 / N[(Pi / 4.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] * N[Log[N[(N[(t$95$1 + t$95$2), $MachinePrecision] / N[(t$95$1 - t$95$2), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision])]]]

Alternative 1: 99.1% accurate, 3.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \frac{4 \cdot \log \tanh \left(\left(0.25 \cdot \pi\right) \cdot f\right)}{\pi} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (f) :precision binary64 (/ (* 4.0 (log (tanh (* (* 0.25 PI) f)))) PI))

C

double code(double f) {
	return (4.0 * log(tanh(((0.25 * ((double) M_PI)) * f)))) / ((double) M_PI);
}

Java

public static double code(double f) {
	return (4.0 * Math.log(Math.tanh(((0.25 * Math.PI) * f)))) / Math.PI;
}

Python

def code(f):
	return (4.0 * math.log(math.tanh(((0.25 * math.pi) * f)))) / math.pi

Julia

function code(f)
	return Float64(Float64(4.0 * log(tanh(Float64(Float64(0.25 * pi) * f)))) / pi)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(f)
	tmp = (4.0 * log(tanh(((0.25 * pi) * f)))) / pi;
end

Wolfram

code[f_] := N[(N[(4.0 * N[Log[N[Tanh[N[(N[(0.25 * Pi), $MachinePrecision] * f), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / Pi), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 6.9%

   \[-\frac{1}{\frac{\pi}{4}} \cdot \log \left(\frac{e^{\frac{\pi}{4} \cdot f} + e^{-\frac{\pi}{4} \cdot f}}{e^{\frac{\pi}{4} \cdot f} - e^{-\frac{\pi}{4} \cdot f}}\right) \]

3. Applied rewrites 99.1%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{4 \cdot \log \tanh \left(\left(0.25 \cdot \pi\right) \cdot f\right)}{\pi}} \]
4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 2: 98.9% accurate, 3.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \log \tanh \left(\left(0.25 \cdot \pi\right) \cdot f\right) \cdot \frac{4}{\pi} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (f) :precision binary64 (* (log (tanh (* (* 0.25 PI) f))) (/ 4.0 PI)))

C

double code(double f) {
	return log(tanh(((0.25 * ((double) M_PI)) * f))) * (4.0 / ((double) M_PI));
}

Java

public static double code(double f) {
	return Math.log(Math.tanh(((0.25 * Math.PI) * f))) * (4.0 / Math.PI);
}

Python

def code(f):
	return math.log(math.tanh(((0.25 * math.pi) * f))) * (4.0 / math.pi)

Julia

function code(f)
	return Float64(log(tanh(Float64(Float64(0.25 * pi) * f))) * Float64(4.0 / pi))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(f)
	tmp = log(tanh(((0.25 * pi) * f))) * (4.0 / pi);
end

Wolfram

code[f_] := N[(N[Log[N[Tanh[N[(N[(0.25 * Pi), $MachinePrecision] * f), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] * N[(4.0 / Pi), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 6.9%

   \[-\frac{1}{\frac{\pi}{4}} \cdot \log \left(\frac{e^{\frac{\pi}{4} \cdot f} + e^{-\frac{\pi}{4} \cdot f}}{e^{\frac{\pi}{4} \cdot f} - e^{-\frac{\pi}{4} \cdot f}}\right) \]

3. Applied rewrites 98.9%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\log \tanh \left(\left(0.25 \cdot \pi\right) \cdot f\right) \cdot \frac{4}{\pi}} \]
4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 3: 95.9% accurate, 3.8× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \frac{4 \cdot \left(\log f + \log \left(0.25 \cdot \pi\right)\right)}{\pi} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (f) :precision binary64 (/ (* 4.0 (+ (log f) (log (* 0.25 PI)))) PI))

C

double code(double f) {
	return (4.0 * (log(f) + log((0.25 * ((double) M_PI))))) / ((double) M_PI);
}

Java

public static double code(double f) {
	return (4.0 * (Math.log(f) + Math.log((0.25 * Math.PI)))) / Math.PI;
}

Python

def code(f):
	return (4.0 * (math.log(f) + math.log((0.25 * math.pi)))) / math.pi

Julia

function code(f)
	return Float64(Float64(4.0 * Float64(log(f) + log(Float64(0.25 * pi)))) / pi)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(f)
	tmp = (4.0 * (log(f) + log((0.25 * pi)))) / pi;
end

Wolfram

code[f_] := N[(N[(4.0 * N[(N[Log[f], $MachinePrecision] + N[Log[N[(0.25 * Pi), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / Pi), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 6.9%

   \[-\frac{1}{\frac{\pi}{4}} \cdot \log \left(\frac{e^{\frac{\pi}{4} \cdot f} + e^{-\frac{\pi}{4} \cdot f}}{e^{\frac{\pi}{4} \cdot f} - e^{-\frac{\pi}{4} \cdot f}}\right) \]

3. Applied rewrites 99.1%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{4 \cdot \log \tanh \left(\left(0.25 \cdot \pi\right) \cdot f\right)}{\pi}} \]

4. Taylor expanded in f around 0

   \[\leadsto \frac{4 \cdot \log \color{blue}{\left(\frac{1}{4} \cdot \left(f \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right)\right)\right)}}{\pi} \]

6. Applied rewrites 95.9%

   \[\leadsto \frac{4 \cdot \log \color{blue}{\left(0.25 \cdot \left(f \cdot \pi\right)\right)}}{\pi} \]

7. Taylor expanded in f around 0

   \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{4 \cdot \left(\log f + \log \left(\frac{1}{4} \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right)\right)\right)}}{\pi} \]

9. Applied rewrites 95.9%

   \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{4 \cdot \left(\log f + \log \left(0.25 \cdot \pi\right)\right)}}{\pi} \]
10. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 4: 95.9% accurate, 4.9× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \frac{4 \cdot \log \left(0.25 \cdot \left(f \cdot \pi\right)\right)}{\pi} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (f) :precision binary64 (/ (* 4.0 (log (* 0.25 (* f PI)))) PI))

C

double code(double f) {
	return (4.0 * log((0.25 * (f * ((double) M_PI))))) / ((double) M_PI);
}

Java

public static double code(double f) {
	return (4.0 * Math.log((0.25 * (f * Math.PI)))) / Math.PI;
}

Python

def code(f):
	return (4.0 * math.log((0.25 * (f * math.pi)))) / math.pi

Julia

function code(f)
	return Float64(Float64(4.0 * log(Float64(0.25 * Float64(f * pi)))) / pi)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(f)
	tmp = (4.0 * log((0.25 * (f * pi)))) / pi;
end

Wolfram

code[f_] := N[(N[(4.0 * N[Log[N[(0.25 * N[(f * Pi), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / Pi), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 6.9%

   \[-\frac{1}{\frac{\pi}{4}} \cdot \log \left(\frac{e^{\frac{\pi}{4} \cdot f} + e^{-\frac{\pi}{4} \cdot f}}{e^{\frac{\pi}{4} \cdot f} - e^{-\frac{\pi}{4} \cdot f}}\right) \]

3. Applied rewrites 99.1%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{4 \cdot \log \tanh \left(\left(0.25 \cdot \pi\right) \cdot f\right)}{\pi}} \]

4. Taylor expanded in f around 0

   \[\leadsto \frac{4 \cdot \log \color{blue}{\left(\frac{1}{4} \cdot \left(f \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right)\right)\right)}}{\pi} \]

6. Applied rewrites 95.9%

   \[\leadsto \frac{4 \cdot \log \color{blue}{\left(0.25 \cdot \left(f \cdot \pi\right)\right)}}{\pi} \]
7. Add Preprocessing

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2025149 
(FPCore (f)
  :name "VandenBroeck and Keller, Equation (20)"
  :precision binary64
  (- (* (/ 1.0 (/ PI 4.0)) (log (/ (+ (exp (* (/ PI 4.0) f)) (exp (- (* (/ PI 4.0) f)))) (- (exp (* (/ PI 4.0) f)) (exp (- (* (/ PI 4.0) f)))))))))