Sample trimmed logistic on [-pi, pi]

Percentage Accurate: 98.9% → 98.9%
Time: 5.9s
Alternatives: 11
Speedup: 1.0×

Specification

?
\[\left(2.328306437 \cdot 10^{-10} \leq u \land u \leq 1\right) \land \left(0 \leq s \land s \leq 1.0651631\right)\]
\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_0 := \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\\ \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - t\_0\right) + t\_0} - 1\right) \end{array} \end{array} \]
(FPCore (u s)
 :precision binary32
 (let* ((t_0 (/ 1.0 (+ 1.0 (exp (/ PI s))))))
   (*
    (- s)
    (log
     (-
      (/ 1.0 (+ (* u (- (/ 1.0 (+ 1.0 (exp (/ (- PI) s)))) t_0)) t_0))
      1.0)))))
float code(float u, float s) {
	float t_0 = 1.0f / (1.0f + expf((((float) M_PI) / s)));
	return -s * logf(((1.0f / ((u * ((1.0f / (1.0f + expf((-((float) M_PI) / s)))) - t_0)) + t_0)) - 1.0f));
}
function code(u, s)
	t_0 = Float32(Float32(1.0) / Float32(Float32(1.0) + exp(Float32(Float32(pi) / s))))
	return Float32(Float32(-s) * log(Float32(Float32(Float32(1.0) / Float32(Float32(u * Float32(Float32(Float32(1.0) / Float32(Float32(1.0) + exp(Float32(Float32(-Float32(pi)) / s)))) - t_0)) + t_0)) - Float32(1.0))))
end
function tmp = code(u, s)
	t_0 = single(1.0) / (single(1.0) + exp((single(pi) / s)));
	tmp = -s * log(((single(1.0) / ((u * ((single(1.0) / (single(1.0) + exp((-single(pi) / s)))) - t_0)) + t_0)) - single(1.0)));
end
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\begin{array}{l}
t_0 := \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\\
\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - t\_0\right) + t\_0} - 1\right)
\end{array}
\end{array}

Local Percentage Accuracy vs ?

The average percentage accuracy by input value. Horizontal axis shows value of an input variable; the variable is choosen in the title. Vertical axis is accuracy; higher is better. Red represent the original program, while blue represents Herbie's suggestion. These can be toggled with buttons below the plot. The line is an average while dots represent individual samples.

Accuracy vs Speed?

Herbie found 11 alternatives:

AlternativeAccuracySpeedup
The accuracy (vertical axis) and speed (horizontal axis) of each alternatives. Up and to the right is better. The red square shows the initial program, and each blue circle shows an alternative.The line shows the best available speed-accuracy tradeoffs.

Initial Program: 98.9% accurate, 1.0× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_0 := \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\\ \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - t\_0\right) + t\_0} - 1\right) \end{array} \end{array} \]
(FPCore (u s)
 :precision binary32
 (let* ((t_0 (/ 1.0 (+ 1.0 (exp (/ PI s))))))
   (*
    (- s)
    (log
     (-
      (/ 1.0 (+ (* u (- (/ 1.0 (+ 1.0 (exp (/ (- PI) s)))) t_0)) t_0))
      1.0)))))
float code(float u, float s) {
	float t_0 = 1.0f / (1.0f + expf((((float) M_PI) / s)));
	return -s * logf(((1.0f / ((u * ((1.0f / (1.0f + expf((-((float) M_PI) / s)))) - t_0)) + t_0)) - 1.0f));
}
function code(u, s)
	t_0 = Float32(Float32(1.0) / Float32(Float32(1.0) + exp(Float32(Float32(pi) / s))))
	return Float32(Float32(-s) * log(Float32(Float32(Float32(1.0) / Float32(Float32(u * Float32(Float32(Float32(1.0) / Float32(Float32(1.0) + exp(Float32(Float32(-Float32(pi)) / s)))) - t_0)) + t_0)) - Float32(1.0))))
end
function tmp = code(u, s)
	t_0 = single(1.0) / (single(1.0) + exp((single(pi) / s)));
	tmp = -s * log(((single(1.0) / ((u * ((single(1.0) / (single(1.0) + exp((-single(pi) / s)))) - t_0)) + t_0)) - single(1.0)));
end
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\begin{array}{l}
t_0 := \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\\
\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - t\_0\right) + t\_0} - 1\right)
\end{array}
\end{array}

Alternative 1: 98.9% accurate, 1.0× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_0 := e^{\frac{\pi}{s}} + 1\\ \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{\left(\frac{1}{t\_0 \cdot u} + \left(\frac{1}{e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}} + 1} - \frac{1}{t\_0}\right)\right) \cdot u} - 1\right) \end{array} \end{array} \]
(FPCore (u s)
 :precision binary32
 (let* ((t_0 (+ (exp (/ PI s)) 1.0)))
   (*
    (- s)
    (log
     (-
      (/
       1.0
       (*
        (+
         (/ 1.0 (* t_0 u))
         (- (/ 1.0 (+ (exp (/ (- PI) s)) 1.0)) (/ 1.0 t_0)))
        u))
      1.0)))))
float code(float u, float s) {
	float t_0 = expf((((float) M_PI) / s)) + 1.0f;
	return -s * logf(((1.0f / (((1.0f / (t_0 * u)) + ((1.0f / (expf((-((float) M_PI) / s)) + 1.0f)) - (1.0f / t_0))) * u)) - 1.0f));
}
function code(u, s)
	t_0 = Float32(exp(Float32(Float32(pi) / s)) + Float32(1.0))
	return Float32(Float32(-s) * log(Float32(Float32(Float32(1.0) / Float32(Float32(Float32(Float32(1.0) / Float32(t_0 * u)) + Float32(Float32(Float32(1.0) / Float32(exp(Float32(Float32(-Float32(pi)) / s)) + Float32(1.0))) - Float32(Float32(1.0) / t_0))) * u)) - Float32(1.0))))
end
function tmp = code(u, s)
	t_0 = exp((single(pi) / s)) + single(1.0);
	tmp = -s * log(((single(1.0) / (((single(1.0) / (t_0 * u)) + ((single(1.0) / (exp((-single(pi) / s)) + single(1.0))) - (single(1.0) / t_0))) * u)) - single(1.0)));
end
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\begin{array}{l}
t_0 := e^{\frac{\pi}{s}} + 1\\
\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{\left(\frac{1}{t\_0 \cdot u} + \left(\frac{1}{e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}} + 1} - \frac{1}{t\_0}\right)\right) \cdot u} - 1\right)
\end{array}
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Initial program 98.9%

    \[\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} - 1\right) \]
  2. Taylor expanded in u around inf

    \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{\color{blue}{u \cdot \left(\left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(1 + e^{\frac{\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{s}}\right)} + \frac{1}{1 + e^{-1 \cdot \frac{\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{s}}}\right) - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{s}}}\right)}} - 1\right) \]
  3. Step-by-step derivation
    1. *-commutativeN/A

      \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{\left(\left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(1 + e^{\frac{\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{s}}\right)} + \frac{1}{1 + e^{-1 \cdot \frac{\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{s}}}\right) - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{s}}}\right) \cdot \color{blue}{u}} - 1\right) \]
    2. lower-*.f32N/A

      \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{\left(\left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(1 + e^{\frac{\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{s}}\right)} + \frac{1}{1 + e^{-1 \cdot \frac{\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{s}}}\right) - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{s}}}\right) \cdot \color{blue}{u}} - 1\right) \]
  4. Applied rewrites98.9%

    \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{\color{blue}{\left(\frac{1}{\left(e^{\frac{\pi}{s}} + 1\right) \cdot u} + \left(\frac{1}{e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}} + 1} - \frac{1}{e^{\frac{\pi}{s}} + 1}\right)\right) \cdot u}} - 1\right) \]
  5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 2: 98.9% accurate, 1.0× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_0 := \frac{1}{e^{\frac{\pi}{s}} + 1}\\ \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\frac{1}{e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}} + 1} - t\_0, u, t\_0\right)} - 1\right) \end{array} \end{array} \]
(FPCore (u s)
 :precision binary32
 (let* ((t_0 (/ 1.0 (+ (exp (/ PI s)) 1.0))))
   (*
    (- s)
    (log
     (- (/ 1.0 (fma (- (/ 1.0 (+ (exp (/ (- PI) s)) 1.0)) t_0) u t_0)) 1.0)))))
float code(float u, float s) {
	float t_0 = 1.0f / (expf((((float) M_PI) / s)) + 1.0f);
	return -s * logf(((1.0f / fmaf(((1.0f / (expf((-((float) M_PI) / s)) + 1.0f)) - t_0), u, t_0)) - 1.0f));
}
function code(u, s)
	t_0 = Float32(Float32(1.0) / Float32(exp(Float32(Float32(pi) / s)) + Float32(1.0)))
	return Float32(Float32(-s) * log(Float32(Float32(Float32(1.0) / fma(Float32(Float32(Float32(1.0) / Float32(exp(Float32(Float32(-Float32(pi)) / s)) + Float32(1.0))) - t_0), u, t_0)) - Float32(1.0))))
end
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\begin{array}{l}
t_0 := \frac{1}{e^{\frac{\pi}{s}} + 1}\\
\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\frac{1}{e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}} + 1} - t\_0, u, t\_0\right)} - 1\right)
\end{array}
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Initial program 98.9%

    \[\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} - 1\right) \]
  2. Applied rewrites98.9%

    \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\log \left(\frac{1}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\frac{1}{e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}} + 1} - \frac{1}{e^{\frac{\pi}{s}} + 1}, u, \frac{1}{e^{\frac{\pi}{s}} + 1}\right)} - 1\right)} \]
  3. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 3: 97.6% accurate, 1.3× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(-1, u, \frac{1}{\frac{1}{1 + e^{-1 \cdot \frac{\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}}\right)}{u}\right) \end{array} \]
(FPCore (u s)
 :precision binary32
 (*
  (- s)
  (log
   (/
    (fma
     -1.0
     u
     (/
      1.0
      (-
       (/ 1.0 (+ 1.0 (exp (* -1.0 (/ PI s)))))
       (/ 1.0 (+ 1.0 (exp (/ PI s)))))))
    u))))
float code(float u, float s) {
	return -s * logf((fmaf(-1.0f, u, (1.0f / ((1.0f / (1.0f + expf((-1.0f * (((float) M_PI) / s))))) - (1.0f / (1.0f + expf((((float) M_PI) / s))))))) / u));
}
function code(u, s)
	return Float32(Float32(-s) * log(Float32(fma(Float32(-1.0), u, Float32(Float32(1.0) / Float32(Float32(Float32(1.0) / Float32(Float32(1.0) + exp(Float32(Float32(-1.0) * Float32(Float32(pi) / s))))) - Float32(Float32(1.0) / Float32(Float32(1.0) + exp(Float32(Float32(pi) / s))))))) / u)))
end
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(-1, u, \frac{1}{\frac{1}{1 + e^{-1 \cdot \frac{\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}}\right)}{u}\right)
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Initial program 98.9%

    \[\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} - 1\right) \]
  2. Taylor expanded in u around inf

    \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \color{blue}{\left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{-1 \cdot \frac{\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{s}}}\right)} - 1\right)} \]
  3. Step-by-step derivation
    1. lower--.f32N/A

      \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{-1 \cdot \frac{\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{s}}}\right)} - \color{blue}{1}\right) \]
  4. Applied rewrites97.5%

    \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \color{blue}{\left(\frac{1}{\left(\frac{1}{e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}} + 1} - \frac{1}{e^{\frac{\pi}{s}} + 1}\right) \cdot u} - 1\right)} \]
  5. Taylor expanded in u around 0

    \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{-1 \cdot u + \frac{1}{\frac{1}{1 + e^{-1 \cdot \frac{\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{s}}}}}{\color{blue}{u}}\right) \]
  6. Step-by-step derivation
    1. lower-/.f32N/A

      \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{-1 \cdot u + \frac{1}{\frac{1}{1 + e^{-1 \cdot \frac{\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{s}}}}}{u}\right) \]
  7. Applied rewrites97.6%

    \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(-1, u, \frac{1}{\frac{1}{1 + e^{-1 \cdot \frac{\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}}\right)}{\color{blue}{u}}\right) \]
  8. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 4: 97.5% accurate, 1.4× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{\left(\frac{1}{e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}} + 1} - \frac{1}{e^{\frac{\pi}{s}} + 1}\right) \cdot u} - 1\right) \end{array} \]
(FPCore (u s)
 :precision binary32
 (*
  (- s)
  (log
   (-
    (/
     1.0
     (*
      (- (/ 1.0 (+ (exp (/ (- PI) s)) 1.0)) (/ 1.0 (+ (exp (/ PI s)) 1.0)))
      u))
    1.0))))
float code(float u, float s) {
	return -s * logf(((1.0f / (((1.0f / (expf((-((float) M_PI) / s)) + 1.0f)) - (1.0f / (expf((((float) M_PI) / s)) + 1.0f))) * u)) - 1.0f));
}
function code(u, s)
	return Float32(Float32(-s) * log(Float32(Float32(Float32(1.0) / Float32(Float32(Float32(Float32(1.0) / Float32(exp(Float32(Float32(-Float32(pi)) / s)) + Float32(1.0))) - Float32(Float32(1.0) / Float32(exp(Float32(Float32(pi) / s)) + Float32(1.0)))) * u)) - Float32(1.0))))
end
function tmp = code(u, s)
	tmp = -s * log(((single(1.0) / (((single(1.0) / (exp((-single(pi) / s)) + single(1.0))) - (single(1.0) / (exp((single(pi) / s)) + single(1.0)))) * u)) - single(1.0)));
end
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{\left(\frac{1}{e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}} + 1} - \frac{1}{e^{\frac{\pi}{s}} + 1}\right) \cdot u} - 1\right)
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Initial program 98.9%

    \[\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} - 1\right) \]
  2. Taylor expanded in u around inf

    \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \color{blue}{\left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{-1 \cdot \frac{\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{s}}}\right)} - 1\right)} \]
  3. Step-by-step derivation
    1. lower--.f32N/A

      \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{-1 \cdot \frac{\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{s}}}\right)} - \color{blue}{1}\right) \]
  4. Applied rewrites97.5%

    \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \color{blue}{\left(\frac{1}{\left(\frac{1}{e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}} + 1} - \frac{1}{e^{\frac{\pi}{s}} + 1}\right) \cdot u} - 1\right)} \]
  5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 5: 94.4% accurate, 1.4× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(-1, u, \frac{1}{\frac{1}{1 + e^{-1 \cdot \frac{\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + \left(1 + \frac{\pi}{s}\right)}}\right)}{u}\right) \end{array} \]
(FPCore (u s)
 :precision binary32
 (*
  (- s)
  (log
   (/
    (fma
     -1.0
     u
     (/
      1.0
      (-
       (/ 1.0 (+ 1.0 (exp (* -1.0 (/ PI s)))))
       (/ 1.0 (+ 1.0 (+ 1.0 (/ PI s)))))))
    u))))
float code(float u, float s) {
	return -s * logf((fmaf(-1.0f, u, (1.0f / ((1.0f / (1.0f + expf((-1.0f * (((float) M_PI) / s))))) - (1.0f / (1.0f + (1.0f + (((float) M_PI) / s))))))) / u));
}
function code(u, s)
	return Float32(Float32(-s) * log(Float32(fma(Float32(-1.0), u, Float32(Float32(1.0) / Float32(Float32(Float32(1.0) / Float32(Float32(1.0) + exp(Float32(Float32(-1.0) * Float32(Float32(pi) / s))))) - Float32(Float32(1.0) / Float32(Float32(1.0) + Float32(Float32(1.0) + Float32(Float32(pi) / s))))))) / u)))
end
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(-1, u, \frac{1}{\frac{1}{1 + e^{-1 \cdot \frac{\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + \left(1 + \frac{\pi}{s}\right)}}\right)}{u}\right)
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Initial program 98.9%

    \[\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} - 1\right) \]
  2. Taylor expanded in u around inf

    \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \color{blue}{\left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{-1 \cdot \frac{\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{s}}}\right)} - 1\right)} \]
  3. Step-by-step derivation
    1. lower--.f32N/A

      \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{-1 \cdot \frac{\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{s}}}\right)} - \color{blue}{1}\right) \]
  4. Applied rewrites97.5%

    \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \color{blue}{\left(\frac{1}{\left(\frac{1}{e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}} + 1} - \frac{1}{e^{\frac{\pi}{s}} + 1}\right) \cdot u} - 1\right)} \]
  5. Taylor expanded in u around 0

    \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{-1 \cdot u + \frac{1}{\frac{1}{1 + e^{-1 \cdot \frac{\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{s}}}}}{\color{blue}{u}}\right) \]
  6. Step-by-step derivation
    1. lower-/.f32N/A

      \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{-1 \cdot u + \frac{1}{\frac{1}{1 + e^{-1 \cdot \frac{\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{s}}}}}{u}\right) \]
  7. Applied rewrites97.6%

    \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(-1, u, \frac{1}{\frac{1}{1 + e^{-1 \cdot \frac{\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}}\right)}{\color{blue}{u}}\right) \]
  8. Taylor expanded in s around inf

    \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(-1, u, \frac{1}{\frac{1}{1 + e^{-1 \cdot \frac{\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + \left(1 + \frac{\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{s}\right)}}\right)}{u}\right) \]
  9. Step-by-step derivation
    1. lower-+.f32N/A

      \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(-1, u, \frac{1}{\frac{1}{1 + e^{-1 \cdot \frac{\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + \left(1 + \frac{\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{s}\right)}}\right)}{u}\right) \]
    2. lift-/.f32N/A

      \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(-1, u, \frac{1}{\frac{1}{1 + e^{-1 \cdot \frac{\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + \left(1 + \frac{\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{s}\right)}}\right)}{u}\right) \]
    3. lift-PI.f3294.4

      \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(-1, u, \frac{1}{\frac{1}{1 + e^{-1 \cdot \frac{\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + \left(1 + \frac{\pi}{s}\right)}}\right)}{u}\right) \]
  10. Applied rewrites94.4%

    \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(-1, u, \frac{1}{\frac{1}{1 + e^{-1 \cdot \frac{\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + \left(1 + \frac{\pi}{s}\right)}}\right)}{u}\right) \]
  11. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 6: 94.3% accurate, 1.6× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{\left(\frac{1}{e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}} + 1} - \frac{1}{2 + \frac{\pi}{s}}\right) \cdot u} - 1\right) \end{array} \]
(FPCore (u s)
 :precision binary32
 (*
  (- s)
  (log
   (-
    (/
     1.0
     (* (- (/ 1.0 (+ (exp (/ (- PI) s)) 1.0)) (/ 1.0 (+ 2.0 (/ PI s)))) u))
    1.0))))
float code(float u, float s) {
	return -s * logf(((1.0f / (((1.0f / (expf((-((float) M_PI) / s)) + 1.0f)) - (1.0f / (2.0f + (((float) M_PI) / s)))) * u)) - 1.0f));
}
function code(u, s)
	return Float32(Float32(-s) * log(Float32(Float32(Float32(1.0) / Float32(Float32(Float32(Float32(1.0) / Float32(exp(Float32(Float32(-Float32(pi)) / s)) + Float32(1.0))) - Float32(Float32(1.0) / Float32(Float32(2.0) + Float32(Float32(pi) / s)))) * u)) - Float32(1.0))))
end
function tmp = code(u, s)
	tmp = -s * log(((single(1.0) / (((single(1.0) / (exp((-single(pi) / s)) + single(1.0))) - (single(1.0) / (single(2.0) + (single(pi) / s)))) * u)) - single(1.0)));
end
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{\left(\frac{1}{e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}} + 1} - \frac{1}{2 + \frac{\pi}{s}}\right) \cdot u} - 1\right)
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Initial program 98.9%

    \[\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} - 1\right) \]
  2. Taylor expanded in u around inf

    \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \color{blue}{\left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{-1 \cdot \frac{\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{s}}}\right)} - 1\right)} \]
  3. Step-by-step derivation
    1. lower--.f32N/A

      \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{-1 \cdot \frac{\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{s}}}\right)} - \color{blue}{1}\right) \]
  4. Applied rewrites97.5%

    \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \color{blue}{\left(\frac{1}{\left(\frac{1}{e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}} + 1} - \frac{1}{e^{\frac{\pi}{s}} + 1}\right) \cdot u} - 1\right)} \]
  5. Taylor expanded in s around inf

    \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{\left(\frac{1}{e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}} + 1} - \frac{1}{2 + \frac{\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{s}}\right) \cdot u} - 1\right) \]
  6. Step-by-step derivation
    1. lower-+.f32N/A

      \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{\left(\frac{1}{e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}} + 1} - \frac{1}{2 + \frac{\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{s}}\right) \cdot u} - 1\right) \]
    2. lift-/.f32N/A

      \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{\left(\frac{1}{e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}} + 1} - \frac{1}{2 + \frac{\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{s}}\right) \cdot u} - 1\right) \]
    3. lift-PI.f3294.3

      \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{\left(\frac{1}{e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}} + 1} - \frac{1}{2 + \frac{\pi}{s}}\right) \cdot u} - 1\right) \]
  7. Applied rewrites94.3%

    \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{\left(\frac{1}{e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}} + 1} - \frac{1}{2 + \frac{\pi}{s}}\right) \cdot u} - 1\right) \]
  8. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 7: 25.0% accurate, 2.9× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(\frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(\pi \cdot 0.5, u, -0.25 \cdot \pi\right)}{s}, -4, 1\right)\right) \end{array} \]
(FPCore (u s)
 :precision binary32
 (* (- s) (log (fma (/ (fma (* PI 0.5) u (* -0.25 PI)) s) -4.0 1.0))))
float code(float u, float s) {
	return -s * logf(fmaf((fmaf((((float) M_PI) * 0.5f), u, (-0.25f * ((float) M_PI))) / s), -4.0f, 1.0f));
}
function code(u, s)
	return Float32(Float32(-s) * log(fma(Float32(fma(Float32(Float32(pi) * Float32(0.5)), u, Float32(Float32(-0.25) * Float32(pi))) / s), Float32(-4.0), Float32(1.0))))
end
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(\frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(\pi \cdot 0.5, u, -0.25 \cdot \pi\right)}{s}, -4, 1\right)\right)
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Initial program 98.9%

    \[\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} - 1\right) \]
  2. Taylor expanded in s around inf

    \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \color{blue}{\left(1 + -4 \cdot \frac{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{4} \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right) - \frac{-1}{4} \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right)\right) - \frac{1}{4} \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{s}\right)} \]
  3. Step-by-step derivation
    1. +-commutativeN/A

      \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(-4 \cdot \frac{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{4} \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right) - \frac{-1}{4} \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right)\right) - \frac{1}{4} \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{s} + \color{blue}{1}\right) \]
    2. *-commutativeN/A

      \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{4} \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right) - \frac{-1}{4} \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right)\right) - \frac{1}{4} \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{s} \cdot -4 + 1\right) \]
    3. lower-fma.f32N/A

      \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(\frac{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{4} \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right) - \frac{-1}{4} \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right)\right) - \frac{1}{4} \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{s}, \color{blue}{-4}, 1\right)\right) \]
  4. Applied rewrites25.0%

    \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \color{blue}{\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(\frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(\pi \cdot 0.5, u, -0.25 \cdot \pi\right)}{s}, -4, 1\right)\right)} \]
  5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 8: 14.4% accurate, 3.7× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(-s\right) \cdot \frac{1}{\frac{0.25 \cdot \pi - -0.25 \cdot \pi}{s} \cdot u} \end{array} \]
(FPCore (u s)
 :precision binary32
 (* (- s) (/ 1.0 (* (/ (- (* 0.25 PI) (* -0.25 PI)) s) u))))
float code(float u, float s) {
	return -s * (1.0f / ((((0.25f * ((float) M_PI)) - (-0.25f * ((float) M_PI))) / s) * u));
}
function code(u, s)
	return Float32(Float32(-s) * Float32(Float32(1.0) / Float32(Float32(Float32(Float32(Float32(0.25) * Float32(pi)) - Float32(Float32(-0.25) * Float32(pi))) / s) * u)))
end
function tmp = code(u, s)
	tmp = -s * (single(1.0) / ((((single(0.25) * single(pi)) - (single(-0.25) * single(pi))) / s) * u));
end
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\left(-s\right) \cdot \frac{1}{\frac{0.25 \cdot \pi - -0.25 \cdot \pi}{s} \cdot u}
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Initial program 98.9%

    \[\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} - 1\right) \]
  2. Taylor expanded in u around inf

    \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{-1 \cdot \frac{\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{s}}}\right)}} \]
  3. Step-by-step derivation
    1. mul-1-negN/A

      \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\mathsf{neg}\left(\frac{\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{s}\right)}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{s}}}\right)} \]
    2. distribute-frac-negN/A

      \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\mathsf{neg}\left(\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)\right)}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{s}}}\right)} \]
    3. lower-/.f32N/A

      \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \frac{1}{\color{blue}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\mathsf{neg}\left(\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)\right)}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{s}}}\right)}} \]
  4. Applied rewrites17.3%

    \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{1}{\left(\frac{1}{e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}} + 1} - \frac{1}{e^{\frac{\pi}{s}} + 1}\right) \cdot u}} \]
  5. Taylor expanded in s around inf

    \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \frac{1}{\frac{\frac{1}{4} \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right) - \frac{-1}{4} \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{s} \cdot u} \]
  6. Step-by-step derivation
    1. lower-/.f32N/A

      \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \frac{1}{\frac{\frac{1}{4} \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right) - \frac{-1}{4} \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{s} \cdot u} \]
    2. lower--.f32N/A

      \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \frac{1}{\frac{\frac{1}{4} \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right) - \frac{-1}{4} \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{s} \cdot u} \]
    3. lower-*.f32N/A

      \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \frac{1}{\frac{\frac{1}{4} \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right) - \frac{-1}{4} \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{s} \cdot u} \]
    4. lift-PI.f32N/A

      \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \frac{1}{\frac{\frac{1}{4} \cdot \pi - \frac{-1}{4} \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{s} \cdot u} \]
    5. lift-*.f32N/A

      \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \frac{1}{\frac{\frac{1}{4} \cdot \pi - \frac{-1}{4} \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{s} \cdot u} \]
    6. lift-PI.f3214.4

      \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \frac{1}{\frac{0.25 \cdot \pi - -0.25 \cdot \pi}{s} \cdot u} \]
  7. Applied rewrites14.4%

    \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \frac{1}{\frac{0.25 \cdot \pi - -0.25 \cdot \pi}{s} \cdot u} \]
  8. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 9: 14.4% accurate, 4.4× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(-s\right) \cdot \frac{s}{u \cdot \left(0.25 \cdot \pi - -0.25 \cdot \pi\right)} \end{array} \]
(FPCore (u s)
 :precision binary32
 (* (- s) (/ s (* u (- (* 0.25 PI) (* -0.25 PI))))))
float code(float u, float s) {
	return -s * (s / (u * ((0.25f * ((float) M_PI)) - (-0.25f * ((float) M_PI)))));
}
function code(u, s)
	return Float32(Float32(-s) * Float32(s / Float32(u * Float32(Float32(Float32(0.25) * Float32(pi)) - Float32(Float32(-0.25) * Float32(pi))))))
end
function tmp = code(u, s)
	tmp = -s * (s / (u * ((single(0.25) * single(pi)) - (single(-0.25) * single(pi)))));
end
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\left(-s\right) \cdot \frac{s}{u \cdot \left(0.25 \cdot \pi - -0.25 \cdot \pi\right)}
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Initial program 98.9%

    \[\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} - 1\right) \]
  2. Taylor expanded in u around inf

    \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{-1 \cdot \frac{\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{s}}}\right)}} \]
  3. Step-by-step derivation
    1. mul-1-negN/A

      \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\mathsf{neg}\left(\frac{\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{s}\right)}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{s}}}\right)} \]
    2. distribute-frac-negN/A

      \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\mathsf{neg}\left(\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)\right)}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{s}}}\right)} \]
    3. lower-/.f32N/A

      \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \frac{1}{\color{blue}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\mathsf{neg}\left(\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)\right)}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{s}}}\right)}} \]
  4. Applied rewrites17.3%

    \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{1}{\left(\frac{1}{e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}} + 1} - \frac{1}{e^{\frac{\pi}{s}} + 1}\right) \cdot u}} \]
  5. Taylor expanded in s around inf

    \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \frac{s}{\color{blue}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{4} \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right) - \frac{-1}{4} \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right)\right)}} \]
  6. Step-by-step derivation
    1. lower-/.f32N/A

      \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \frac{s}{u \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\frac{1}{4} \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right) - \frac{-1}{4} \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right)\right)}} \]
    2. lower-*.f32N/A

      \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \frac{s}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{4} \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right) - \color{blue}{\frac{-1}{4} \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}\right)} \]
    3. lower--.f32N/A

      \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \frac{s}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{4} \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right) - \frac{-1}{4} \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}\right)} \]
    4. lower-*.f32N/A

      \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \frac{s}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{4} \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right) - \frac{-1}{4} \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right)\right)} \]
    5. lift-PI.f32N/A

      \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \frac{s}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{4} \cdot \pi - \frac{-1}{4} \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right)\right)} \]
    6. lift-*.f32N/A

      \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \frac{s}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{4} \cdot \pi - \frac{-1}{4} \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right)\right)} \]
    7. lift-PI.f3214.4

      \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \frac{s}{u \cdot \left(0.25 \cdot \pi - -0.25 \cdot \pi\right)} \]
  7. Applied rewrites14.4%

    \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \frac{s}{\color{blue}{u \cdot \left(0.25 \cdot \pi - -0.25 \cdot \pi\right)}} \]
  8. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 10: 11.6% accurate, 5.9× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \mathsf{fma}\left(\pi \cdot 0.5, u, -0.25 \cdot \pi\right) \cdot 4 \end{array} \]
(FPCore (u s) :precision binary32 (* (fma (* PI 0.5) u (* -0.25 PI)) 4.0))
float code(float u, float s) {
	return fmaf((((float) M_PI) * 0.5f), u, (-0.25f * ((float) M_PI))) * 4.0f;
}
function code(u, s)
	return Float32(fma(Float32(Float32(pi) * Float32(0.5)), u, Float32(Float32(-0.25) * Float32(pi))) * Float32(4.0))
end
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\mathsf{fma}\left(\pi \cdot 0.5, u, -0.25 \cdot \pi\right) \cdot 4
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Initial program 98.9%

    \[\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} - 1\right) \]
  2. Taylor expanded in s around inf

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{4 \cdot \left(u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{4} \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right) - \frac{-1}{4} \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right)\right) - \frac{1}{4} \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right)\right)} \]
  3. Step-by-step derivation
    1. *-commutativeN/A

      \[\leadsto \left(u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{4} \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right) - \frac{-1}{4} \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right)\right) - \frac{1}{4} \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right)\right) \cdot \color{blue}{4} \]
    2. lower-*.f32N/A

      \[\leadsto \left(u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{4} \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right) - \frac{-1}{4} \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right)\right) - \frac{1}{4} \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right)\right) \cdot \color{blue}{4} \]
  4. Applied rewrites11.6%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\pi \cdot 0.5, u, -0.25 \cdot \pi\right) \cdot 4} \]
  5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 11: 11.5% accurate, 46.3× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ -\pi \end{array} \]
(FPCore (u s) :precision binary32 (- PI))
float code(float u, float s) {
	return -((float) M_PI);
}
function code(u, s)
	return Float32(-Float32(pi))
end
function tmp = code(u, s)
	tmp = -single(pi);
end
\begin{array}{l}

\\
-\pi
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Initial program 98.9%

    \[\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} - 1\right) \]
  2. Taylor expanded in u around 0

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right)} \]
  3. Step-by-step derivation
    1. mul-1-negN/A

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{neg}\left(\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)\right) \]
    2. lift-neg.f32N/A

      \[\leadsto -\mathsf{PI}\left(\right) \]
    3. lift-PI.f3211.5

      \[\leadsto -\pi \]
  4. Applied rewrites11.5%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-\pi} \]
  5. Add Preprocessing

Reproduce

?
herbie shell --seed 2025136 
(FPCore (u s)
  :name "Sample trimmed logistic on [-pi, pi]"
  :precision binary32
  :pre (and (and (<= 2.328306437e-10 u) (<= u 1.0)) (and (<= 0.0 s) (<= s 1.0651631)))
  (* (- s) (log (- (/ 1.0 (+ (* u (- (/ 1.0 (+ 1.0 (exp (/ (- PI) s)))) (/ 1.0 (+ 1.0 (exp (/ PI s)))))) (/ 1.0 (+ 1.0 (exp (/ PI s)))))) 1.0))))