Sample trimmed logistic on [-pi, pi]

Percentage Accurate: 99.0% → 99.0%
Time: 3.7s
Alternatives: 9
Speedup: N/A×

Specification

?
\[\left(2.328306437 \cdot 10^{-10} \leq u \land u \leq 1\right) \land \left(0 \leq s \land s \leq 1.0651631\right)\]
\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_0 := \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\\ \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - t\_0\right) + t\_0} - 1\right) \end{array} \end{array} \]
(FPCore (u s)
 :precision binary32
 (let* ((t_0 (/ 1.0 (+ 1.0 (exp (/ PI s))))))
   (*
    (- s)
    (log
     (-
      (/ 1.0 (+ (* u (- (/ 1.0 (+ 1.0 (exp (/ (- PI) s)))) t_0)) t_0))
      1.0)))))
float code(float u, float s) {
	float t_0 = 1.0f / (1.0f + expf((((float) M_PI) / s)));
	return -s * logf(((1.0f / ((u * ((1.0f / (1.0f + expf((-((float) M_PI) / s)))) - t_0)) + t_0)) - 1.0f));
}
function code(u, s)
	t_0 = Float32(Float32(1.0) / Float32(Float32(1.0) + exp(Float32(Float32(pi) / s))))
	return Float32(Float32(-s) * log(Float32(Float32(Float32(1.0) / Float32(Float32(u * Float32(Float32(Float32(1.0) / Float32(Float32(1.0) + exp(Float32(Float32(-Float32(pi)) / s)))) - t_0)) + t_0)) - Float32(1.0))))
end
function tmp = code(u, s)
	t_0 = single(1.0) / (single(1.0) + exp((single(pi) / s)));
	tmp = -s * log(((single(1.0) / ((u * ((single(1.0) / (single(1.0) + exp((-single(pi) / s)))) - t_0)) + t_0)) - single(1.0)));
end
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\begin{array}{l}
t_0 := \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\\
\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - t\_0\right) + t\_0} - 1\right)
\end{array}
\end{array}

Local Percentage Accuracy vs ?

The average percentage accuracy by input value. Horizontal axis shows value of an input variable; the variable is choosen in the title. Vertical axis is accuracy; higher is better. Red represent the original program, while blue represents Herbie's suggestion. These can be toggled with buttons below the plot. The line is an average while dots represent individual samples.

Accuracy vs Speed?

Herbie found 9 alternatives:

AlternativeAccuracySpeedup
The accuracy (vertical axis) and speed (horizontal axis) of each alternatives. Up and to the right is better. The red square shows the initial program, and each blue circle shows an alternative.The line shows the best available speed-accuracy tradeoffs.

Initial Program: 99.0% accurate, 1.0× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_0 := \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\\ \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - t\_0\right) + t\_0} - 1\right) \end{array} \end{array} \]
(FPCore (u s)
 :precision binary32
 (let* ((t_0 (/ 1.0 (+ 1.0 (exp (/ PI s))))))
   (*
    (- s)
    (log
     (-
      (/ 1.0 (+ (* u (- (/ 1.0 (+ 1.0 (exp (/ (- PI) s)))) t_0)) t_0))
      1.0)))))
float code(float u, float s) {
	float t_0 = 1.0f / (1.0f + expf((((float) M_PI) / s)));
	return -s * logf(((1.0f / ((u * ((1.0f / (1.0f + expf((-((float) M_PI) / s)))) - t_0)) + t_0)) - 1.0f));
}
function code(u, s)
	t_0 = Float32(Float32(1.0) / Float32(Float32(1.0) + exp(Float32(Float32(pi) / s))))
	return Float32(Float32(-s) * log(Float32(Float32(Float32(1.0) / Float32(Float32(u * Float32(Float32(Float32(1.0) / Float32(Float32(1.0) + exp(Float32(Float32(-Float32(pi)) / s)))) - t_0)) + t_0)) - Float32(1.0))))
end
function tmp = code(u, s)
	t_0 = single(1.0) / (single(1.0) + exp((single(pi) / s)));
	tmp = -s * log(((single(1.0) / ((u * ((single(1.0) / (single(1.0) + exp((-single(pi) / s)))) - t_0)) + t_0)) - single(1.0)));
end
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\begin{array}{l}
t_0 := \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\\
\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - t\_0\right) + t\_0} - 1\right)
\end{array}
\end{array}

Alternative 1: 99.0% accurate, 1.0× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_0 := \frac{1}{e^{\frac{\pi}{s}} - -1}\\ \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\frac{1}{e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}} - -1} - t\_0, u, t\_0\right)} - 1\right) \end{array} \end{array} \]
(FPCore (u s)
 :precision binary32
 (let* ((t_0 (/ 1.0 (- (exp (/ PI s)) -1.0))))
   (*
    (- s)
    (log
     (-
      (/ 1.0 (fma (- (/ 1.0 (- (exp (/ (- PI) s)) -1.0)) t_0) u t_0))
      1.0)))))
float code(float u, float s) {
	float t_0 = 1.0f / (expf((((float) M_PI) / s)) - -1.0f);
	return -s * logf(((1.0f / fmaf(((1.0f / (expf((-((float) M_PI) / s)) - -1.0f)) - t_0), u, t_0)) - 1.0f));
}
function code(u, s)
	t_0 = Float32(Float32(1.0) / Float32(exp(Float32(Float32(pi) / s)) - Float32(-1.0)))
	return Float32(Float32(-s) * log(Float32(Float32(Float32(1.0) / fma(Float32(Float32(Float32(1.0) / Float32(exp(Float32(Float32(-Float32(pi)) / s)) - Float32(-1.0))) - t_0), u, t_0)) - Float32(1.0))))
end
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\begin{array}{l}
t_0 := \frac{1}{e^{\frac{\pi}{s}} - -1}\\
\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\frac{1}{e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}} - -1} - t\_0, u, t\_0\right)} - 1\right)
\end{array}
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Initial program 99.0%

    \[\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} - 1\right) \]
  2. Applied rewrites99.0%

    \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\frac{1}{e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}} + 1} - \frac{1}{e^{\frac{\pi}{s}} + 1}, u, \frac{1}{e^{\frac{\pi}{s}} + 1}\right)}} - 1\right) \]
  3. Step-by-step derivation
    1. Applied rewrites99.0%

      \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\log \left(\frac{1}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\frac{1}{e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}} - -1} - \frac{1}{e^{\frac{\pi}{s}} - -1}, u, \frac{1}{e^{\frac{\pi}{s}} - -1}\right)} - 1\right)} \]
    2. Add Preprocessing

    Alternative 2: 97.7% accurate, 1.4× speedup?

    \[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{\left(\frac{1}{e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}} - -1} - \frac{1}{e^{\frac{\pi}{s}} - -1}\right) \cdot u} - 1\right) \end{array} \]
    (FPCore (u s)
     :precision binary32
     (*
      (- s)
      (log
       (-
        (/
         1.0
         (*
          (- (/ 1.0 (- (exp (/ (- PI) s)) -1.0)) (/ 1.0 (- (exp (/ PI s)) -1.0)))
          u))
        1.0))))
    float code(float u, float s) {
    	return -s * logf(((1.0f / (((1.0f / (expf((-((float) M_PI) / s)) - -1.0f)) - (1.0f / (expf((((float) M_PI) / s)) - -1.0f))) * u)) - 1.0f));
    }
    
    function code(u, s)
    	return Float32(Float32(-s) * log(Float32(Float32(Float32(1.0) / Float32(Float32(Float32(Float32(1.0) / Float32(exp(Float32(Float32(-Float32(pi)) / s)) - Float32(-1.0))) - Float32(Float32(1.0) / Float32(exp(Float32(Float32(pi) / s)) - Float32(-1.0)))) * u)) - Float32(1.0))))
    end
    
    function tmp = code(u, s)
    	tmp = -s * log(((single(1.0) / (((single(1.0) / (exp((-single(pi) / s)) - single(-1.0))) - (single(1.0) / (exp((single(pi) / s)) - single(-1.0)))) * u)) - single(1.0)));
    end
    
    \begin{array}{l}
    
    \\
    \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{\left(\frac{1}{e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}} - -1} - \frac{1}{e^{\frac{\pi}{s}} - -1}\right) \cdot u} - 1\right)
    \end{array}
    
    Derivation
    1. Initial program 99.0%

      \[\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} - 1\right) \]
    2. Taylor expanded in u around inf

      \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\color{blue}{\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{-1 \cdot \frac{\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{s}}}\right)}} - 1\right) \]
    3. Applied rewrites97.7%

      \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\color{blue}{\frac{1}{\left(\frac{1}{e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}} + 1} - \frac{1}{e^{\frac{\pi}{s}} + 1}\right) \cdot u}} - 1\right) \]
    4. Step-by-step derivation
      1. Applied rewrites97.7%

        \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{\color{blue}{\left(\frac{1}{e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}} - -1} - \frac{1}{e^{\frac{\pi}{s}} - -1}\right) \cdot u}} - 1\right) \]
      2. Add Preprocessing

      Alternative 3: 94.6% accurate, 1.6× speedup?

      \[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{\left(\frac{1}{e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}} - -1} - \frac{1}{2 + \frac{\pi}{s}}\right) \cdot u} - 1\right) \end{array} \]
      (FPCore (u s)
       :precision binary32
       (*
        (- s)
        (log
         (-
          (/
           1.0
           (* (- (/ 1.0 (- (exp (/ (- PI) s)) -1.0)) (/ 1.0 (+ 2.0 (/ PI s)))) u))
          1.0))))
      float code(float u, float s) {
      	return -s * logf(((1.0f / (((1.0f / (expf((-((float) M_PI) / s)) - -1.0f)) - (1.0f / (2.0f + (((float) M_PI) / s)))) * u)) - 1.0f));
      }
      
      function code(u, s)
      	return Float32(Float32(-s) * log(Float32(Float32(Float32(1.0) / Float32(Float32(Float32(Float32(1.0) / Float32(exp(Float32(Float32(-Float32(pi)) / s)) - Float32(-1.0))) - Float32(Float32(1.0) / Float32(Float32(2.0) + Float32(Float32(pi) / s)))) * u)) - Float32(1.0))))
      end
      
      function tmp = code(u, s)
      	tmp = -s * log(((single(1.0) / (((single(1.0) / (exp((-single(pi) / s)) - single(-1.0))) - (single(1.0) / (single(2.0) + (single(pi) / s)))) * u)) - single(1.0)));
      end
      
      \begin{array}{l}
      
      \\
      \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{\left(\frac{1}{e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}} - -1} - \frac{1}{2 + \frac{\pi}{s}}\right) \cdot u} - 1\right)
      \end{array}
      
      Derivation
      1. Initial program 99.0%

        \[\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} - 1\right) \]
      2. Taylor expanded in u around inf

        \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\color{blue}{\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{-1 \cdot \frac{\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{s}}}\right)}} - 1\right) \]
      3. Applied rewrites97.7%

        \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\color{blue}{\frac{1}{\left(\frac{1}{e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}} + 1} - \frac{1}{e^{\frac{\pi}{s}} + 1}\right) \cdot u}} - 1\right) \]
      4. Step-by-step derivation
        1. Applied rewrites97.7%

          \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{\color{blue}{\left(\frac{1}{e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}} - -1} - \frac{1}{e^{\frac{\pi}{s}} - -1}\right) \cdot u}} - 1\right) \]
        2. Taylor expanded in s around inf

          \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{\left(\frac{1}{e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}} - -1} - \frac{1}{2 + \frac{\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{s}}\right) \cdot u} - 1\right) \]
        3. Step-by-step derivation
          1. lower-+.f32N/A

            \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{\left(\frac{1}{e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}} - -1} - \frac{1}{2 + \frac{\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{s}}\right) \cdot u} - 1\right) \]
          2. lift-/.f32N/A

            \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{\left(\frac{1}{e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}} - -1} - \frac{1}{2 + \frac{\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{s}}\right) \cdot u} - 1\right) \]
          3. lift-PI.f3294.6

            \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{\left(\frac{1}{e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}} - -1} - \frac{1}{2 + \frac{\pi}{s}}\right) \cdot u} - 1\right) \]
        4. Applied rewrites94.6%

          \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{\left(\frac{1}{e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}} - -1} - \frac{1}{2 + \frac{\pi}{s}}\right) \cdot u} - 1\right) \]
        5. Add Preprocessing

        Alternative 4: 37.1% accurate, 2.7× speedup?

        \[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{\left(0.5 - \frac{1}{2 + \frac{\pi}{s}}\right) \cdot u} - 1\right) \end{array} \]
        (FPCore (u s)
         :precision binary32
         (* (- s) (log (- (/ 1.0 (* (- 0.5 (/ 1.0 (+ 2.0 (/ PI s)))) u)) 1.0))))
        float code(float u, float s) {
        	return -s * logf(((1.0f / ((0.5f - (1.0f / (2.0f + (((float) M_PI) / s)))) * u)) - 1.0f));
        }
        
        function code(u, s)
        	return Float32(Float32(-s) * log(Float32(Float32(Float32(1.0) / Float32(Float32(Float32(0.5) - Float32(Float32(1.0) / Float32(Float32(2.0) + Float32(Float32(pi) / s)))) * u)) - Float32(1.0))))
        end
        
        function tmp = code(u, s)
        	tmp = -s * log(((single(1.0) / ((single(0.5) - (single(1.0) / (single(2.0) + (single(pi) / s)))) * u)) - single(1.0)));
        end
        
        \begin{array}{l}
        
        \\
        \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{\left(0.5 - \frac{1}{2 + \frac{\pi}{s}}\right) \cdot u} - 1\right)
        \end{array}
        
        Derivation
        1. Initial program 99.0%

          \[\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} - 1\right) \]
        2. Taylor expanded in u around inf

          \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\color{blue}{\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{-1 \cdot \frac{\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{s}}}\right)}} - 1\right) \]
        3. Applied rewrites97.7%

          \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\color{blue}{\frac{1}{\left(\frac{1}{e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}} + 1} - \frac{1}{e^{\frac{\pi}{s}} + 1}\right) \cdot u}} - 1\right) \]
        4. Step-by-step derivation
          1. Applied rewrites97.7%

            \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{\color{blue}{\left(\frac{1}{e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}} - -1} - \frac{1}{e^{\frac{\pi}{s}} - -1}\right) \cdot u}} - 1\right) \]
          2. Taylor expanded in s around inf

            \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{\left(\frac{1}{e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}} - -1} - \frac{1}{2 + \frac{\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{s}}\right) \cdot u} - 1\right) \]
          3. Step-by-step derivation
            1. lower-+.f32N/A

              \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{\left(\frac{1}{e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}} - -1} - \frac{1}{2 + \frac{\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{s}}\right) \cdot u} - 1\right) \]
            2. lift-/.f32N/A

              \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{\left(\frac{1}{e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}} - -1} - \frac{1}{2 + \frac{\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{s}}\right) \cdot u} - 1\right) \]
            3. lift-PI.f3294.6

              \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{\left(\frac{1}{e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}} - -1} - \frac{1}{2 + \frac{\pi}{s}}\right) \cdot u} - 1\right) \]
          4. Applied rewrites94.6%

            \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{\left(\frac{1}{e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}} - -1} - \frac{1}{2 + \frac{\pi}{s}}\right) \cdot u} - 1\right) \]
          5. Taylor expanded in s around inf

            \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{\left(\frac{1}{2} - \frac{1}{2 + \frac{\pi}{s}}\right) \cdot u} - 1\right) \]
          6. Step-by-step derivation
            1. Applied rewrites37.1%

              \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{\left(0.5 - \frac{1}{2 + \frac{\pi}{s}}\right) \cdot u} - 1\right) \]
            2. Add Preprocessing

            Alternative 5: 25.1% accurate, 5.1× speedup?

            \[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(1 + \frac{\pi}{s}\right) \end{array} \]
            (FPCore (u s) :precision binary32 (* (- s) (log (+ 1.0 (/ PI s)))))
            float code(float u, float s) {
            	return -s * logf((1.0f + (((float) M_PI) / s)));
            }
            
            function code(u, s)
            	return Float32(Float32(-s) * log(Float32(Float32(1.0) + Float32(Float32(pi) / s))))
            end
            
            function tmp = code(u, s)
            	tmp = -s * log((single(1.0) + (single(pi) / s)));
            end
            
            \begin{array}{l}
            
            \\
            \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(1 + \frac{\pi}{s}\right)
            \end{array}
            
            Derivation
            1. Initial program 99.0%

              \[\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} - 1\right) \]
            2. Taylor expanded in s around inf

              \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \color{blue}{\left(1 + -4 \cdot \frac{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{4} \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right) - \frac{-1}{4} \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right)\right) - \frac{1}{4} \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{s}\right)} \]
            3. Step-by-step derivation
              1. +-commutativeN/A

                \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(-4 \cdot \frac{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{4} \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right) - \frac{-1}{4} \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right)\right) - \frac{1}{4} \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{s} + \color{blue}{1}\right) \]
              2. *-commutativeN/A

                \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{4} \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right) - \frac{-1}{4} \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right)\right) - \frac{1}{4} \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{s} \cdot -4 + 1\right) \]
              3. lower-fma.f32N/A

                \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(\frac{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{4} \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right) - \frac{-1}{4} \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right)\right) - \frac{1}{4} \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{s}, \color{blue}{-4}, 1\right)\right) \]
            4. Applied rewrites24.8%

              \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \color{blue}{\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(\frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(\pi \cdot 0.5, u, -0.25 \cdot \pi\right)}{s}, -4, 1\right)\right)} \]
            5. Taylor expanded in u around 0

              \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(1 + \color{blue}{\frac{\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{s}}\right) \]
            6. Step-by-step derivation
              1. lower-+.f32N/A

                \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(1 + \frac{\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{\color{blue}{s}}\right) \]
              2. lift-/.f32N/A

                \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(1 + \frac{\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{s}\right) \]
              3. lift-PI.f3225.1

                \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(1 + \frac{\pi}{s}\right) \]
            7. Applied rewrites25.1%

              \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(1 + \color{blue}{\frac{\pi}{s}}\right) \]
            8. Add Preprocessing

            Alternative 6: 11.5% accurate, 5.6× speedup?

            \[\begin{array}{l} \\ u \cdot \mathsf{fma}\left(-1, \frac{\pi}{u}, 2 \cdot \pi\right) \end{array} \]
            (FPCore (u s) :precision binary32 (* u (fma -1.0 (/ PI u) (* 2.0 PI))))
            float code(float u, float s) {
            	return u * fmaf(-1.0f, (((float) M_PI) / u), (2.0f * ((float) M_PI)));
            }
            
            function code(u, s)
            	return Float32(u * fma(Float32(-1.0), Float32(Float32(pi) / u), Float32(Float32(2.0) * Float32(pi))))
            end
            
            \begin{array}{l}
            
            \\
            u \cdot \mathsf{fma}\left(-1, \frac{\pi}{u}, 2 \cdot \pi\right)
            \end{array}
            
            Derivation
            1. Initial program 99.0%

              \[\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} - 1\right) \]
            2. Taylor expanded in s around inf

              \[\leadsto \color{blue}{4 \cdot \left(u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{4} \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right) - \frac{-1}{4} \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right)\right) - \frac{1}{4} \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right)\right)} \]
            3. Step-by-step derivation
              1. *-commutativeN/A

                \[\leadsto \left(u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{4} \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right) - \frac{-1}{4} \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right)\right) - \frac{1}{4} \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right)\right) \cdot \color{blue}{4} \]
              2. lower-*.f32N/A

                \[\leadsto \left(u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{4} \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right) - \frac{-1}{4} \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right)\right) - \frac{1}{4} \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right)\right) \cdot \color{blue}{4} \]
            4. Applied rewrites11.5%

              \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\pi \cdot 0.5, u, -0.25 \cdot \pi\right) \cdot 4} \]
            5. Taylor expanded in u around inf

              \[\leadsto u \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot \frac{\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{u} + 2 \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right)\right)} \]
            6. Step-by-step derivation
              1. lower-*.f32N/A

                \[\leadsto u \cdot \left(-1 \cdot \frac{\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{u} + \color{blue}{2 \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}\right) \]
              2. lower-fma.f32N/A

                \[\leadsto u \cdot \mathsf{fma}\left(-1, \frac{\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{\color{blue}{u}}, 2 \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right)\right) \]
              3. lower-/.f32N/A

                \[\leadsto u \cdot \mathsf{fma}\left(-1, \frac{\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{u}, 2 \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right)\right) \]
              4. lift-PI.f32N/A

                \[\leadsto u \cdot \mathsf{fma}\left(-1, \frac{\pi}{u}, 2 \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right)\right) \]
              5. lower-*.f32N/A

                \[\leadsto u \cdot \mathsf{fma}\left(-1, \frac{\pi}{u}, 2 \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right)\right) \]
              6. lift-PI.f3211.5

                \[\leadsto u \cdot \mathsf{fma}\left(-1, \frac{\pi}{u}, 2 \cdot \pi\right) \]
            7. Applied rewrites11.5%

              \[\leadsto u \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(-1, \frac{\pi}{u}, 2 \cdot \pi\right)} \]
            8. Add Preprocessing

            Alternative 7: 11.5% accurate, 7.3× speedup?

            \[\begin{array}{l} \\ \mathsf{fma}\left(-1, \pi, 2 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right)\right) \end{array} \]
            (FPCore (u s) :precision binary32 (fma -1.0 PI (* 2.0 (* u PI))))
            float code(float u, float s) {
            	return fmaf(-1.0f, ((float) M_PI), (2.0f * (u * ((float) M_PI))));
            }
            
            function code(u, s)
            	return fma(Float32(-1.0), Float32(pi), Float32(Float32(2.0) * Float32(u * Float32(pi))))
            end
            
            \begin{array}{l}
            
            \\
            \mathsf{fma}\left(-1, \pi, 2 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right)\right)
            \end{array}
            
            Derivation
            1. Initial program 99.0%

              \[\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} - 1\right) \]
            2. Taylor expanded in s around inf

              \[\leadsto \color{blue}{4 \cdot \left(u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{4} \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right) - \frac{-1}{4} \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right)\right) - \frac{1}{4} \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right)\right)} \]
            3. Step-by-step derivation
              1. *-commutativeN/A

                \[\leadsto \left(u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{4} \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right) - \frac{-1}{4} \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right)\right) - \frac{1}{4} \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right)\right) \cdot \color{blue}{4} \]
              2. lower-*.f32N/A

                \[\leadsto \left(u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{4} \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right) - \frac{-1}{4} \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right)\right) - \frac{1}{4} \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right)\right) \cdot \color{blue}{4} \]
            4. Applied rewrites11.5%

              \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\pi \cdot 0.5, u, -0.25 \cdot \pi\right) \cdot 4} \]
            5. Taylor expanded in u around 0

              \[\leadsto -1 \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right) + \color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(u \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right)\right)} \]
            6. Step-by-step derivation
              1. lower-fma.f32N/A

                \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(-1, \mathsf{PI}\left(\right), 2 \cdot \left(u \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right)\right)\right) \]
              2. lift-PI.f32N/A

                \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(-1, \pi, 2 \cdot \left(u \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right)\right)\right) \]
              3. lower-*.f32N/A

                \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(-1, \pi, 2 \cdot \left(u \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right)\right)\right) \]
              4. lower-*.f32N/A

                \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(-1, \pi, 2 \cdot \left(u \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right)\right)\right) \]
              5. lift-PI.f3211.5

                \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(-1, \pi, 2 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right)\right) \]
            7. Applied rewrites11.5%

              \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(-1, \color{blue}{\pi}, 2 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right)\right) \]
            8. Add Preprocessing

            Alternative 8: 11.2% accurate, 8.2× speedup?

            \[\begin{array}{l} \\ u \cdot \left(-1 \cdot \frac{\pi}{u}\right) \end{array} \]
            (FPCore (u s) :precision binary32 (* u (* -1.0 (/ PI u))))
            float code(float u, float s) {
            	return u * (-1.0f * (((float) M_PI) / u));
            }
            
            function code(u, s)
            	return Float32(u * Float32(Float32(-1.0) * Float32(Float32(pi) / u)))
            end
            
            function tmp = code(u, s)
            	tmp = u * (single(-1.0) * (single(pi) / u));
            end
            
            \begin{array}{l}
            
            \\
            u \cdot \left(-1 \cdot \frac{\pi}{u}\right)
            \end{array}
            
            Derivation
            1. Initial program 99.0%

              \[\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} - 1\right) \]
            2. Taylor expanded in s around inf

              \[\leadsto \color{blue}{4 \cdot \left(u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{4} \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right) - \frac{-1}{4} \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right)\right) - \frac{1}{4} \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right)\right)} \]
            3. Step-by-step derivation
              1. *-commutativeN/A

                \[\leadsto \left(u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{4} \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right) - \frac{-1}{4} \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right)\right) - \frac{1}{4} \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right)\right) \cdot \color{blue}{4} \]
              2. lower-*.f32N/A

                \[\leadsto \left(u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{4} \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right) - \frac{-1}{4} \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right)\right) - \frac{1}{4} \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right)\right) \cdot \color{blue}{4} \]
            4. Applied rewrites11.5%

              \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\pi \cdot 0.5, u, -0.25 \cdot \pi\right) \cdot 4} \]
            5. Taylor expanded in u around inf

              \[\leadsto u \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot \frac{\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{u} + 2 \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right)\right)} \]
            6. Step-by-step derivation
              1. lower-*.f32N/A

                \[\leadsto u \cdot \left(-1 \cdot \frac{\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{u} + \color{blue}{2 \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}\right) \]
              2. lower-fma.f32N/A

                \[\leadsto u \cdot \mathsf{fma}\left(-1, \frac{\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{\color{blue}{u}}, 2 \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right)\right) \]
              3. lower-/.f32N/A

                \[\leadsto u \cdot \mathsf{fma}\left(-1, \frac{\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{u}, 2 \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right)\right) \]
              4. lift-PI.f32N/A

                \[\leadsto u \cdot \mathsf{fma}\left(-1, \frac{\pi}{u}, 2 \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right)\right) \]
              5. lower-*.f32N/A

                \[\leadsto u \cdot \mathsf{fma}\left(-1, \frac{\pi}{u}, 2 \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right)\right) \]
              6. lift-PI.f3211.5

                \[\leadsto u \cdot \mathsf{fma}\left(-1, \frac{\pi}{u}, 2 \cdot \pi\right) \]
            7. Applied rewrites11.5%

              \[\leadsto u \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(-1, \frac{\pi}{u}, 2 \cdot \pi\right)} \]
            8. Taylor expanded in u around 0

              \[\leadsto u \cdot \left(-1 \cdot \frac{\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{\color{blue}{u}}\right) \]
            9. Step-by-step derivation
              1. lower-*.f32N/A

                \[\leadsto u \cdot \left(-1 \cdot \frac{\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{u}\right) \]
              2. lift-/.f32N/A

                \[\leadsto u \cdot \left(-1 \cdot \frac{\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{u}\right) \]
              3. lift-PI.f3211.2

                \[\leadsto u \cdot \left(-1 \cdot \frac{\pi}{u}\right) \]
            10. Applied rewrites11.2%

              \[\leadsto u \cdot \left(-1 \cdot \frac{\pi}{\color{blue}{u}}\right) \]
            11. Add Preprocessing

            Alternative 9: 11.2% accurate, 46.3× speedup?

            \[\begin{array}{l} \\ -\pi \end{array} \]
            (FPCore (u s) :precision binary32 (- PI))
            float code(float u, float s) {
            	return -((float) M_PI);
            }
            
            function code(u, s)
            	return Float32(-Float32(pi))
            end
            
            function tmp = code(u, s)
            	tmp = -single(pi);
            end
            
            \begin{array}{l}
            
            \\
            -\pi
            \end{array}
            
            Derivation
            1. Initial program 99.0%

              \[\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} - 1\right) \]
            2. Taylor expanded in u around 0

              \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right)} \]
            3. Step-by-step derivation
              1. mul-1-negN/A

                \[\leadsto \mathsf{neg}\left(\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)\right) \]
              2. lift-neg.f32N/A

                \[\leadsto -\mathsf{PI}\left(\right) \]
              3. lift-PI.f3211.2

                \[\leadsto -\pi \]
            4. Applied rewrites11.2%

              \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-\pi} \]
            5. Add Preprocessing

            Reproduce

            ?
            herbie shell --seed 2025134 
            (FPCore (u s)
              :name "Sample trimmed logistic on [-pi, pi]"
              :precision binary32
              :pre (and (and (<= 2.328306437e-10 u) (<= u 1.0)) (and (<= 0.0 s) (<= s 1.0651631)))
              (* (- s) (log (- (/ 1.0 (+ (* u (- (/ 1.0 (+ 1.0 (exp (/ (- PI) s)))) (/ 1.0 (+ 1.0 (exp (/ PI s)))))) (/ 1.0 (+ 1.0 (exp (/ PI s)))))) 1.0))))