Sample trimmed logistic on [-pi, pi]

Percentage Accurate: 98.9% → 98.9%
Time: 4.4s
Alternatives: 9
Speedup: 1.0×

Specification

?
\[\left(2.328306437 \cdot 10^{-10} \leq u \land u \leq 1\right) \land \left(0 \leq s \land s \leq 1.0651631\right)\]
\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_0 := \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\\ \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - t\_0\right) + t\_0} - 1\right) \end{array} \end{array} \]
(FPCore (u s)
 :precision binary32
 (let* ((t_0 (/ 1.0 (+ 1.0 (exp (/ PI s))))))
   (*
    (- s)
    (log
     (-
      (/ 1.0 (+ (* u (- (/ 1.0 (+ 1.0 (exp (/ (- PI) s)))) t_0)) t_0))
      1.0)))))
float code(float u, float s) {
	float t_0 = 1.0f / (1.0f + expf((((float) M_PI) / s)));
	return -s * logf(((1.0f / ((u * ((1.0f / (1.0f + expf((-((float) M_PI) / s)))) - t_0)) + t_0)) - 1.0f));
}
function code(u, s)
	t_0 = Float32(Float32(1.0) / Float32(Float32(1.0) + exp(Float32(Float32(pi) / s))))
	return Float32(Float32(-s) * log(Float32(Float32(Float32(1.0) / Float32(Float32(u * Float32(Float32(Float32(1.0) / Float32(Float32(1.0) + exp(Float32(Float32(-Float32(pi)) / s)))) - t_0)) + t_0)) - Float32(1.0))))
end
function tmp = code(u, s)
	t_0 = single(1.0) / (single(1.0) + exp((single(pi) / s)));
	tmp = -s * log(((single(1.0) / ((u * ((single(1.0) / (single(1.0) + exp((-single(pi) / s)))) - t_0)) + t_0)) - single(1.0)));
end
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\begin{array}{l}
t_0 := \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\\
\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - t\_0\right) + t\_0} - 1\right)
\end{array}
\end{array}

Local Percentage Accuracy vs ?

The average percentage accuracy by input value. Horizontal axis shows value of an input variable; the variable is choosen in the title. Vertical axis is accuracy; higher is better. Red represent the original program, while blue represents Herbie's suggestion. These can be toggled with buttons below the plot. The line is an average while dots represent individual samples.

Accuracy vs Speed?

Herbie found 9 alternatives:

AlternativeAccuracySpeedup
The accuracy (vertical axis) and speed (horizontal axis) of each alternatives. Up and to the right is better. The red square shows the initial program, and each blue circle shows an alternative.The line shows the best available speed-accuracy tradeoffs.

Initial Program: 98.9% accurate, 1.0× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_0 := \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\\ \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - t\_0\right) + t\_0} - 1\right) \end{array} \end{array} \]
(FPCore (u s)
 :precision binary32
 (let* ((t_0 (/ 1.0 (+ 1.0 (exp (/ PI s))))))
   (*
    (- s)
    (log
     (-
      (/ 1.0 (+ (* u (- (/ 1.0 (+ 1.0 (exp (/ (- PI) s)))) t_0)) t_0))
      1.0)))))
float code(float u, float s) {
	float t_0 = 1.0f / (1.0f + expf((((float) M_PI) / s)));
	return -s * logf(((1.0f / ((u * ((1.0f / (1.0f + expf((-((float) M_PI) / s)))) - t_0)) + t_0)) - 1.0f));
}
function code(u, s)
	t_0 = Float32(Float32(1.0) / Float32(Float32(1.0) + exp(Float32(Float32(pi) / s))))
	return Float32(Float32(-s) * log(Float32(Float32(Float32(1.0) / Float32(Float32(u * Float32(Float32(Float32(1.0) / Float32(Float32(1.0) + exp(Float32(Float32(-Float32(pi)) / s)))) - t_0)) + t_0)) - Float32(1.0))))
end
function tmp = code(u, s)
	t_0 = single(1.0) / (single(1.0) + exp((single(pi) / s)));
	tmp = -s * log(((single(1.0) / ((u * ((single(1.0) / (single(1.0) + exp((-single(pi) / s)))) - t_0)) + t_0)) - single(1.0)));
end
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\begin{array}{l}
t_0 := \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\\
\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - t\_0\right) + t\_0} - 1\right)
\end{array}
\end{array}

Alternative 1: 98.9% accurate, 1.0× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_0 := \frac{1}{e^{\frac{\pi}{s}} - -1}\\ \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\frac{1}{e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}} - -1} - t\_0, u, t\_0\right)} - 1\right) \end{array} \end{array} \]
(FPCore (u s)
 :precision binary32
 (let* ((t_0 (/ 1.0 (- (exp (/ PI s)) -1.0))))
   (*
    (- s)
    (log
     (-
      (/ 1.0 (fma (- (/ 1.0 (- (exp (/ (- PI) s)) -1.0)) t_0) u t_0))
      1.0)))))
float code(float u, float s) {
	float t_0 = 1.0f / (expf((((float) M_PI) / s)) - -1.0f);
	return -s * logf(((1.0f / fmaf(((1.0f / (expf((-((float) M_PI) / s)) - -1.0f)) - t_0), u, t_0)) - 1.0f));
}
function code(u, s)
	t_0 = Float32(Float32(1.0) / Float32(exp(Float32(Float32(pi) / s)) - Float32(-1.0)))
	return Float32(Float32(-s) * log(Float32(Float32(Float32(1.0) / fma(Float32(Float32(Float32(1.0) / Float32(exp(Float32(Float32(-Float32(pi)) / s)) - Float32(-1.0))) - t_0), u, t_0)) - Float32(1.0))))
end
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\begin{array}{l}
t_0 := \frac{1}{e^{\frac{\pi}{s}} - -1}\\
\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\frac{1}{e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}} - -1} - t\_0, u, t\_0\right)} - 1\right)
\end{array}
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Initial program 98.9%

    \[\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} - 1\right) \]
  2. Applied rewrites98.9%

    \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\frac{1}{e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}} + 1} - \frac{1}{e^{\frac{\pi}{s}} + 1}, u, \frac{1}{e^{\frac{\pi}{s}} + 1}\right)}} - 1\right) \]
  3. Step-by-step derivation
    1. Applied rewrites98.9%

      \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\log \left(\frac{1}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\frac{1}{e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}} - -1} - \frac{1}{e^{\frac{\pi}{s}} - -1}, u, \frac{1}{e^{\frac{\pi}{s}} - -1}\right)} - 1\right)} \]
    2. Add Preprocessing

    Alternative 2: 97.6% accurate, 1.4× speedup?

    \[\begin{array}{l} \\ \log \left(\frac{1}{\left(\frac{1}{e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}} - -1} - \frac{1}{e^{\frac{\pi}{s}} - -1}\right) \cdot u} - 1\right) \cdot \left(-s\right) \end{array} \]
    (FPCore (u s)
     :precision binary32
     (*
      (log
       (-
        (/
         1.0
         (*
          (- (/ 1.0 (- (exp (/ (- PI) s)) -1.0)) (/ 1.0 (- (exp (/ PI s)) -1.0)))
          u))
        1.0))
      (- s)))
    float code(float u, float s) {
    	return logf(((1.0f / (((1.0f / (expf((-((float) M_PI) / s)) - -1.0f)) - (1.0f / (expf((((float) M_PI) / s)) - -1.0f))) * u)) - 1.0f)) * -s;
    }
    
    function code(u, s)
    	return Float32(log(Float32(Float32(Float32(1.0) / Float32(Float32(Float32(Float32(1.0) / Float32(exp(Float32(Float32(-Float32(pi)) / s)) - Float32(-1.0))) - Float32(Float32(1.0) / Float32(exp(Float32(Float32(pi) / s)) - Float32(-1.0)))) * u)) - Float32(1.0))) * Float32(-s))
    end
    
    function tmp = code(u, s)
    	tmp = log(((single(1.0) / (((single(1.0) / (exp((-single(pi) / s)) - single(-1.0))) - (single(1.0) / (exp((single(pi) / s)) - single(-1.0)))) * u)) - single(1.0))) * -s;
    end
    
    \begin{array}{l}
    
    \\
    \log \left(\frac{1}{\left(\frac{1}{e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}} - -1} - \frac{1}{e^{\frac{\pi}{s}} - -1}\right) \cdot u} - 1\right) \cdot \left(-s\right)
    \end{array}
    
    Derivation
    1. Initial program 98.9%

      \[\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} - 1\right) \]
    2. Applied rewrites98.9%

      \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\frac{1}{e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}} + 1} - \frac{1}{e^{\frac{\pi}{s}} + 1}, u, \frac{1}{e^{\frac{\pi}{s}} + 1}\right)}} - 1\right) \]
    3. Taylor expanded in u around inf

      \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\color{blue}{\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{-1 \cdot \frac{\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{s}}}\right)}} - 1\right) \]
    4. Applied rewrites97.6%

      \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\color{blue}{\frac{1}{\left(\frac{1}{e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}} - -1} - \frac{1}{e^{\frac{\pi}{s}} - -1}\right) \cdot u}} - 1\right) \]
    5. Step-by-step derivation
      1. lift-*.f32N/A

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{\left(\frac{1}{e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}} - -1} - \frac{1}{e^{\frac{\pi}{s}} - -1}\right) \cdot u} - 1\right)} \]
      2. *-commutativeN/A

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\log \left(\frac{1}{\left(\frac{1}{e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}} - -1} - \frac{1}{e^{\frac{\pi}{s}} - -1}\right) \cdot u} - 1\right) \cdot \left(-s\right)} \]
      3. lower-*.f3297.6

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\log \left(\frac{1}{\left(\frac{1}{e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}} - -1} - \frac{1}{e^{\frac{\pi}{s}} - -1}\right) \cdot u} - 1\right) \cdot \left(-s\right)} \]
    6. Applied rewrites97.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\log \left(\frac{1}{\left(\frac{1}{e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}} - -1} - \frac{1}{e^{\frac{\pi}{s}} - -1}\right) \cdot u} - 1\right) \cdot \left(-s\right)} \]
    7. Add Preprocessing

    Alternative 3: 94.3% accurate, 1.6× speedup?

    \[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{\left(\frac{1}{e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}} - -1} - \frac{1}{2 + \frac{\pi}{s}}\right) \cdot u} - 1\right) \end{array} \]
    (FPCore (u s)
     :precision binary32
     (*
      (- s)
      (log
       (-
        (/
         1.0
         (* (- (/ 1.0 (- (exp (/ (- PI) s)) -1.0)) (/ 1.0 (+ 2.0 (/ PI s)))) u))
        1.0))))
    float code(float u, float s) {
    	return -s * logf(((1.0f / (((1.0f / (expf((-((float) M_PI) / s)) - -1.0f)) - (1.0f / (2.0f + (((float) M_PI) / s)))) * u)) - 1.0f));
    }
    
    function code(u, s)
    	return Float32(Float32(-s) * log(Float32(Float32(Float32(1.0) / Float32(Float32(Float32(Float32(1.0) / Float32(exp(Float32(Float32(-Float32(pi)) / s)) - Float32(-1.0))) - Float32(Float32(1.0) / Float32(Float32(2.0) + Float32(Float32(pi) / s)))) * u)) - Float32(1.0))))
    end
    
    function tmp = code(u, s)
    	tmp = -s * log(((single(1.0) / (((single(1.0) / (exp((-single(pi) / s)) - single(-1.0))) - (single(1.0) / (single(2.0) + (single(pi) / s)))) * u)) - single(1.0)));
    end
    
    \begin{array}{l}
    
    \\
    \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{\left(\frac{1}{e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}} - -1} - \frac{1}{2 + \frac{\pi}{s}}\right) \cdot u} - 1\right)
    \end{array}
    
    Derivation
    1. Initial program 98.9%

      \[\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} - 1\right) \]
    2. Applied rewrites98.9%

      \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\frac{1}{e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}} + 1} - \frac{1}{e^{\frac{\pi}{s}} + 1}, u, \frac{1}{e^{\frac{\pi}{s}} + 1}\right)}} - 1\right) \]
    3. Taylor expanded in u around inf

      \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\color{blue}{\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{-1 \cdot \frac{\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{s}}}\right)}} - 1\right) \]
    4. Applied rewrites97.6%

      \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\color{blue}{\frac{1}{\left(\frac{1}{e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}} - -1} - \frac{1}{e^{\frac{\pi}{s}} - -1}\right) \cdot u}} - 1\right) \]
    5. Taylor expanded in s around inf

      \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{\left(\frac{1}{e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}} - -1} - \frac{1}{2 + \frac{\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{s}}\right) \cdot u} - 1\right) \]
    6. Step-by-step derivation
      1. lower-+.f32N/A

        \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{\left(\frac{1}{e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}} - -1} - \frac{1}{2 + \frac{\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{s}}\right) \cdot u} - 1\right) \]
      2. lift-/.f32N/A

        \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{\left(\frac{1}{e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}} - -1} - \frac{1}{2 + \frac{\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{s}}\right) \cdot u} - 1\right) \]
      3. lift-PI.f3294.3

        \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{\left(\frac{1}{e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}} - -1} - \frac{1}{2 + \frac{\pi}{s}}\right) \cdot u} - 1\right) \]
    7. Applied rewrites94.3%

      \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{\left(\frac{1}{e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}} - -1} - \frac{1}{2 + \frac{\pi}{s}}\right) \cdot u} - 1\right) \]
    8. Add Preprocessing

    Alternative 4: 37.1% accurate, 2.0× speedup?

    \[\begin{array}{l} \\ \log \left(\frac{1}{\left(0.5 - \frac{1}{e^{\frac{\pi}{s}} - -1}\right) \cdot u} - 1\right) \cdot \left(-s\right) \end{array} \]
    (FPCore (u s)
     :precision binary32
     (* (log (- (/ 1.0 (* (- 0.5 (/ 1.0 (- (exp (/ PI s)) -1.0))) u)) 1.0)) (- s)))
    float code(float u, float s) {
    	return logf(((1.0f / ((0.5f - (1.0f / (expf((((float) M_PI) / s)) - -1.0f))) * u)) - 1.0f)) * -s;
    }
    
    function code(u, s)
    	return Float32(log(Float32(Float32(Float32(1.0) / Float32(Float32(Float32(0.5) - Float32(Float32(1.0) / Float32(exp(Float32(Float32(pi) / s)) - Float32(-1.0)))) * u)) - Float32(1.0))) * Float32(-s))
    end
    
    function tmp = code(u, s)
    	tmp = log(((single(1.0) / ((single(0.5) - (single(1.0) / (exp((single(pi) / s)) - single(-1.0)))) * u)) - single(1.0))) * -s;
    end
    
    \begin{array}{l}
    
    \\
    \log \left(\frac{1}{\left(0.5 - \frac{1}{e^{\frac{\pi}{s}} - -1}\right) \cdot u} - 1\right) \cdot \left(-s\right)
    \end{array}
    
    Derivation
    1. Initial program 98.9%

      \[\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} - 1\right) \]
    2. Applied rewrites98.9%

      \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\frac{1}{e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}} + 1} - \frac{1}{e^{\frac{\pi}{s}} + 1}, u, \frac{1}{e^{\frac{\pi}{s}} + 1}\right)}} - 1\right) \]
    3. Taylor expanded in u around inf

      \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\color{blue}{\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{-1 \cdot \frac{\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{s}}}\right)}} - 1\right) \]
    4. Applied rewrites97.6%

      \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\color{blue}{\frac{1}{\left(\frac{1}{e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}} - -1} - \frac{1}{e^{\frac{\pi}{s}} - -1}\right) \cdot u}} - 1\right) \]
    5. Step-by-step derivation
      1. lift-*.f32N/A

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{\left(\frac{1}{e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}} - -1} - \frac{1}{e^{\frac{\pi}{s}} - -1}\right) \cdot u} - 1\right)} \]
      2. *-commutativeN/A

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\log \left(\frac{1}{\left(\frac{1}{e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}} - -1} - \frac{1}{e^{\frac{\pi}{s}} - -1}\right) \cdot u} - 1\right) \cdot \left(-s\right)} \]
      3. lower-*.f3297.6

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\log \left(\frac{1}{\left(\frac{1}{e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}} - -1} - \frac{1}{e^{\frac{\pi}{s}} - -1}\right) \cdot u} - 1\right) \cdot \left(-s\right)} \]
    6. Applied rewrites97.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\log \left(\frac{1}{\left(\frac{1}{e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}} - -1} - \frac{1}{e^{\frac{\pi}{s}} - -1}\right) \cdot u} - 1\right) \cdot \left(-s\right)} \]
    7. Taylor expanded in s around inf

      \[\leadsto \log \left(\frac{1}{\left(\frac{1}{2} - \frac{1}{e^{\frac{\pi}{s}} - -1}\right) \cdot u} - 1\right) \cdot \left(-s\right) \]
    8. Step-by-step derivation
      1. Applied rewrites37.1%

        \[\leadsto \log \left(\frac{1}{\left(0.5 - \frac{1}{e^{\frac{\pi}{s}} - -1}\right) \cdot u} - 1\right) \cdot \left(-s\right) \]
      2. Add Preprocessing

      Alternative 5: 25.1% accurate, 5.1× speedup?

      \[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{\pi}{s} + 1\right) \end{array} \]
      (FPCore (u s) :precision binary32 (* (- s) (log (+ (/ PI s) 1.0))))
      float code(float u, float s) {
      	return -s * logf(((((float) M_PI) / s) + 1.0f));
      }
      
      function code(u, s)
      	return Float32(Float32(-s) * log(Float32(Float32(Float32(pi) / s) + Float32(1.0))))
      end
      
      function tmp = code(u, s)
      	tmp = -s * log(((single(pi) / s) + single(1.0)));
      end
      
      \begin{array}{l}
      
      \\
      \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{\pi}{s} + 1\right)
      \end{array}
      
      Derivation
      1. Initial program 98.9%

        \[\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} - 1\right) \]
      2. Applied rewrites98.9%

        \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\frac{1}{e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}} + 1} - \frac{1}{e^{\frac{\pi}{s}} + 1}, u, \frac{1}{e^{\frac{\pi}{s}} + 1}\right)}} - 1\right) \]
      3. Step-by-step derivation
        1. Applied rewrites98.9%

          \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\log \left(\frac{1}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\frac{1}{e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}} - -1} - \frac{1}{e^{\frac{\pi}{s}} - -1}, u, \frac{1}{e^{\frac{\pi}{s}} - -1}\right)} - 1\right)} \]
        2. Taylor expanded in s around -inf

          \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \color{blue}{\left(1 + 4 \cdot \frac{u \cdot \left(\frac{-1}{4} \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right) - \frac{1}{4} \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right)\right) - \frac{-1}{4} \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{s}\right)} \]
        3. Step-by-step derivation
          1. +-commutativeN/A

            \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(4 \cdot \frac{u \cdot \left(\frac{-1}{4} \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right) - \frac{1}{4} \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right)\right) - \frac{-1}{4} \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{s} + \color{blue}{1}\right) \]
          2. *-commutativeN/A

            \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{u \cdot \left(\frac{-1}{4} \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right) - \frac{1}{4} \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right)\right) - \frac{-1}{4} \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{s} \cdot 4 + 1\right) \]
          3. lower-fma.f32N/A

            \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(\frac{u \cdot \left(\frac{-1}{4} \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right) - \frac{1}{4} \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right)\right) - \frac{-1}{4} \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{s}, \color{blue}{4}, 1\right)\right) \]
        4. Applied rewrites24.9%

          \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \color{blue}{\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(\frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(\pi \cdot -0.5, u, 0.25 \cdot \pi\right)}{s}, 4, 1\right)\right)} \]
        5. Taylor expanded in u around 0

          \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(1 + \color{blue}{\frac{\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{s}}\right) \]
        6. Step-by-step derivation
          1. +-commutativeN/A

            \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{s} + 1\right) \]
          2. lower-+.f32N/A

            \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{s} + 1\right) \]
          3. lift-/.f32N/A

            \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{s} + 1\right) \]
          4. lift-PI.f3225.1

            \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{\pi}{s} + 1\right) \]
        7. Applied rewrites25.1%

          \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{\pi}{s} + \color{blue}{1}\right) \]
        8. Add Preprocessing

        Alternative 6: 11.5% accurate, 5.4× speedup?

        \[\begin{array}{l} \\ \mathsf{fma}\left(\frac{-\pi}{u}, u, \left(\pi + \pi\right) \cdot u\right) \end{array} \]
        (FPCore (u s) :precision binary32 (fma (/ (- PI) u) u (* (+ PI PI) u)))
        float code(float u, float s) {
        	return fmaf((-((float) M_PI) / u), u, ((((float) M_PI) + ((float) M_PI)) * u));
        }
        
        function code(u, s)
        	return fma(Float32(Float32(-Float32(pi)) / u), u, Float32(Float32(Float32(pi) + Float32(pi)) * u))
        end
        
        \begin{array}{l}
        
        \\
        \mathsf{fma}\left(\frac{-\pi}{u}, u, \left(\pi + \pi\right) \cdot u\right)
        \end{array}
        
        Derivation
        1. Initial program 98.9%

          \[\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} - 1\right) \]
        2. Taylor expanded in s around inf

          \[\leadsto \color{blue}{4 \cdot \left(u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{4} \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right) - \frac{-1}{4} \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right)\right) - \frac{1}{4} \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right)\right)} \]
        3. Step-by-step derivation
          1. *-commutativeN/A

            \[\leadsto \left(u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{4} \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right) - \frac{-1}{4} \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right)\right) - \frac{1}{4} \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right)\right) \cdot \color{blue}{4} \]
          2. lower-*.f32N/A

            \[\leadsto \left(u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{4} \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right) - \frac{-1}{4} \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right)\right) - \frac{1}{4} \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right)\right) \cdot \color{blue}{4} \]
        4. Applied rewrites11.5%

          \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\pi \cdot 0.5, u, -0.25 \cdot \pi\right) \cdot 4} \]
        5. Taylor expanded in u around inf

          \[\leadsto u \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot \frac{\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{u} + 2 \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right)\right)} \]
        6. Step-by-step derivation
          1. *-commutativeN/A

            \[\leadsto \left(-1 \cdot \frac{\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{u} + 2 \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right)\right) \cdot u \]
          2. lower-*.f32N/A

            \[\leadsto \left(-1 \cdot \frac{\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{u} + 2 \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right)\right) \cdot u \]
          3. +-commutativeN/A

            \[\leadsto \left(2 \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right) + -1 \cdot \frac{\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{u}\right) \cdot u \]
          4. lower-fma.f32N/A

            \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(2, \mathsf{PI}\left(\right), -1 \cdot \frac{\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{u}\right) \cdot u \]
          5. lift-PI.f32N/A

            \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(2, \pi, -1 \cdot \frac{\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{u}\right) \cdot u \]
          6. associate-*r/N/A

            \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(2, \pi, \frac{-1 \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{u}\right) \cdot u \]
          7. lower-/.f32N/A

            \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(2, \pi, \frac{-1 \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{u}\right) \cdot u \]
          8. mul-1-negN/A

            \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(2, \pi, \frac{\mathsf{neg}\left(\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)\right)}{u}\right) \cdot u \]
          9. lift-neg.f32N/A

            \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(2, \pi, \frac{-\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{u}\right) \cdot u \]
          10. lift-PI.f3211.5

            \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(2, \pi, \frac{-\pi}{u}\right) \cdot u \]
        7. Applied rewrites11.5%

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(2, \pi, \frac{-\pi}{u}\right) \cdot \color{blue}{u} \]
        8. Step-by-step derivation
          1. lift-*.f32N/A

            \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(2, \pi, \frac{-\pi}{u}\right) \cdot u \]
          2. lift-PI.f32N/A

            \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(2, \mathsf{PI}\left(\right), \frac{-\pi}{u}\right) \cdot u \]
          3. lift-fma.f32N/A

            \[\leadsto \left(2 \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right) + \frac{-\pi}{u}\right) \cdot u \]
          4. lift-/.f32N/A

            \[\leadsto \left(2 \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right) + \frac{-\pi}{u}\right) \cdot u \]
          5. lift-PI.f32N/A

            \[\leadsto \left(2 \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right) + \frac{-\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{u}\right) \cdot u \]
          6. lift-neg.f32N/A

            \[\leadsto \left(2 \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right) + \frac{\mathsf{neg}\left(\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)\right)}{u}\right) \cdot u \]
          7. distribute-frac-negN/A

            \[\leadsto \left(2 \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right) + \left(\mathsf{neg}\left(\frac{\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{u}\right)\right)\right) \cdot u \]
          8. mul-1-negN/A

            \[\leadsto \left(2 \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right) + -1 \cdot \frac{\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{u}\right) \cdot u \]
          9. +-commutativeN/A

            \[\leadsto \left(-1 \cdot \frac{\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{u} + 2 \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right)\right) \cdot u \]
          10. *-commutativeN/A

            \[\leadsto u \cdot \left(-1 \cdot \frac{\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{u} + \color{blue}{2 \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}\right) \]
          11. distribute-rgt-inN/A

            \[\leadsto \left(-1 \cdot \frac{\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{u}\right) \cdot u + \left(2 \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right)\right) \cdot \color{blue}{u} \]
          12. lower-fma.f32N/A

            \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(-1 \cdot \frac{\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{u}, u, \left(2 \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right)\right) \cdot u\right) \]
          13. mul-1-negN/A

            \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{neg}\left(\frac{\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{u}\right), u, \left(2 \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right)\right) \cdot u\right) \]
          14. distribute-frac-negN/A

            \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\frac{\mathsf{neg}\left(\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)\right)}{u}, u, \left(2 \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right)\right) \cdot u\right) \]
          15. lift-neg.f32N/A

            \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\frac{-\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{u}, u, \left(2 \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right)\right) \cdot u\right) \]
          16. lift-PI.f32N/A

            \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\frac{-\pi}{u}, u, \left(2 \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right)\right) \cdot u\right) \]
          17. lift-/.f32N/A

            \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\frac{-\pi}{u}, u, \left(2 \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right)\right) \cdot u\right) \]
          18. lower-*.f32N/A

            \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\frac{-\pi}{u}, u, \left(2 \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right)\right) \cdot u\right) \]
        9. Applied rewrites11.5%

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\frac{-\pi}{u}, u, \left(\pi + \pi\right) \cdot u\right) \]
        10. Add Preprocessing

        Alternative 7: 11.5% accurate, 9.3× speedup?

        \[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(u \cdot \pi\right) \cdot 2 - \pi \end{array} \]
        (FPCore (u s) :precision binary32 (- (* (* u PI) 2.0) PI))
        float code(float u, float s) {
        	return ((u * ((float) M_PI)) * 2.0f) - ((float) M_PI);
        }
        
        function code(u, s)
        	return Float32(Float32(Float32(u * Float32(pi)) * Float32(2.0)) - Float32(pi))
        end
        
        function tmp = code(u, s)
        	tmp = ((u * single(pi)) * single(2.0)) - single(pi);
        end
        
        \begin{array}{l}
        
        \\
        \left(u \cdot \pi\right) \cdot 2 - \pi
        \end{array}
        
        Derivation
        1. Initial program 98.9%

          \[\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} - 1\right) \]
        2. Taylor expanded in s around inf

          \[\leadsto \color{blue}{4 \cdot \left(u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{4} \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right) - \frac{-1}{4} \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right)\right) - \frac{1}{4} \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right)\right)} \]
        3. Step-by-step derivation
          1. *-commutativeN/A

            \[\leadsto \left(u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{4} \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right) - \frac{-1}{4} \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right)\right) - \frac{1}{4} \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right)\right) \cdot \color{blue}{4} \]
          2. lower-*.f32N/A

            \[\leadsto \left(u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{4} \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right) - \frac{-1}{4} \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right)\right) - \frac{1}{4} \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right)\right) \cdot \color{blue}{4} \]
        4. Applied rewrites11.5%

          \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\pi \cdot 0.5, u, -0.25 \cdot \pi\right) \cdot 4} \]
        5. Taylor expanded in u around inf

          \[\leadsto u \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot \frac{\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{u} + 2 \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right)\right)} \]
        6. Step-by-step derivation
          1. *-commutativeN/A

            \[\leadsto \left(-1 \cdot \frac{\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{u} + 2 \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right)\right) \cdot u \]
          2. lower-*.f32N/A

            \[\leadsto \left(-1 \cdot \frac{\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{u} + 2 \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right)\right) \cdot u \]
          3. +-commutativeN/A

            \[\leadsto \left(2 \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right) + -1 \cdot \frac{\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{u}\right) \cdot u \]
          4. lower-fma.f32N/A

            \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(2, \mathsf{PI}\left(\right), -1 \cdot \frac{\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{u}\right) \cdot u \]
          5. lift-PI.f32N/A

            \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(2, \pi, -1 \cdot \frac{\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{u}\right) \cdot u \]
          6. associate-*r/N/A

            \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(2, \pi, \frac{-1 \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{u}\right) \cdot u \]
          7. lower-/.f32N/A

            \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(2, \pi, \frac{-1 \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{u}\right) \cdot u \]
          8. mul-1-negN/A

            \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(2, \pi, \frac{\mathsf{neg}\left(\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)\right)}{u}\right) \cdot u \]
          9. lift-neg.f32N/A

            \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(2, \pi, \frac{-\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{u}\right) \cdot u \]
          10. lift-PI.f3211.5

            \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(2, \pi, \frac{-\pi}{u}\right) \cdot u \]
        7. Applied rewrites11.5%

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(2, \pi, \frac{-\pi}{u}\right) \cdot \color{blue}{u} \]
        8. Taylor expanded in u around inf

          \[\leadsto \left(2 \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right)\right) \cdot u \]
        9. Step-by-step derivation
          1. count-2-revN/A

            \[\leadsto \left(\mathsf{PI}\left(\right) + \mathsf{PI}\left(\right)\right) \cdot u \]
          2. lower-+.f32N/A

            \[\leadsto \left(\mathsf{PI}\left(\right) + \mathsf{PI}\left(\right)\right) \cdot u \]
          3. lift-PI.f32N/A

            \[\leadsto \left(\pi + \mathsf{PI}\left(\right)\right) \cdot u \]
          4. lift-PI.f325.0

            \[\leadsto \left(\pi + \pi\right) \cdot u \]
        10. Applied rewrites5.0%

          \[\leadsto \left(\pi + \pi\right) \cdot u \]
        11. Taylor expanded in u around 0

          \[\leadsto -1 \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right) + \color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(u \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right)\right)} \]
        12. Step-by-step derivation
          1. +-commutativeN/A

            \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(u \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right)\right) + -1 \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)} \]
          2. mul-1-negN/A

            \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(u \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right)\right) + \left(\mathsf{neg}\left(\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)\right)\right) \]
          3. sub-flipN/A

            \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(u \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right)\right) - \mathsf{PI}\left(\right) \]
          4. lower--.f32N/A

            \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(u \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right)\right) - \mathsf{PI}\left(\right) \]
          5. *-commutativeN/A

            \[\leadsto \left(u \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right)\right) \cdot 2 - \mathsf{PI}\left(\right) \]
          6. lower-*.f32N/A

            \[\leadsto \left(u \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right)\right) \cdot 2 - \mathsf{PI}\left(\right) \]
          7. lower-*.f32N/A

            \[\leadsto \left(u \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right)\right) \cdot 2 - \mathsf{PI}\left(\right) \]
          8. lift-PI.f32N/A

            \[\leadsto \left(u \cdot \pi\right) \cdot 2 - \mathsf{PI}\left(\right) \]
          9. lift-PI.f3211.5

            \[\leadsto \left(u \cdot \pi\right) \cdot 2 - \pi \]
        13. Applied rewrites11.5%

          \[\leadsto \left(u \cdot \pi\right) \cdot 2 - \color{blue}{\pi} \]
        14. Add Preprocessing

        Alternative 8: 11.3% accurate, 10.3× speedup?

        \[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(-s\right) \cdot \frac{\pi}{s} \end{array} \]
        (FPCore (u s) :precision binary32 (* (- s) (/ PI s)))
        float code(float u, float s) {
        	return -s * (((float) M_PI) / s);
        }
        
        function code(u, s)
        	return Float32(Float32(-s) * Float32(Float32(pi) / s))
        end
        
        function tmp = code(u, s)
        	tmp = -s * (single(pi) / s);
        end
        
        \begin{array}{l}
        
        \\
        \left(-s\right) \cdot \frac{\pi}{s}
        \end{array}
        
        Derivation
        1. Initial program 98.9%

          \[\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} - 1\right) \]
        2. Taylor expanded in u around 0

          \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{s}} \]
        3. Step-by-step derivation
          1. lift-/.f32N/A

            \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \frac{\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{\color{blue}{s}} \]
          2. lift-PI.f3211.2

            \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \frac{\pi}{s} \]
        4. Applied rewrites11.2%

          \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{\pi}{s}} \]
        5. Add Preprocessing

        Alternative 9: 11.2% accurate, 46.3× speedup?

        \[\begin{array}{l} \\ -\pi \end{array} \]
        (FPCore (u s) :precision binary32 (- PI))
        float code(float u, float s) {
        	return -((float) M_PI);
        }
        
        function code(u, s)
        	return Float32(-Float32(pi))
        end
        
        function tmp = code(u, s)
        	tmp = -single(pi);
        end
        
        \begin{array}{l}
        
        \\
        -\pi
        \end{array}
        
        Derivation
        1. Initial program 98.9%

          \[\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} - 1\right) \]
        2. Taylor expanded in u around 0

          \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right)} \]
        3. Step-by-step derivation
          1. mul-1-negN/A

            \[\leadsto \mathsf{neg}\left(\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)\right) \]
          2. lift-neg.f32N/A

            \[\leadsto -\mathsf{PI}\left(\right) \]
          3. lift-PI.f3211.3

            \[\leadsto -\pi \]
        4. Applied rewrites11.3%

          \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-\pi} \]
        5. Add Preprocessing

        Reproduce

        ?
        herbie shell --seed 2025129 
        (FPCore (u s)
          :name "Sample trimmed logistic on [-pi, pi]"
          :precision binary32
          :pre (and (and (<= 2.328306437e-10 u) (<= u 1.0)) (and (<= 0.0 s) (<= s 1.0651631)))
          (* (- s) (log (- (/ 1.0 (+ (* u (- (/ 1.0 (+ 1.0 (exp (/ (- PI) s)))) (/ 1.0 (+ 1.0 (exp (/ PI s)))))) (/ 1.0 (+ 1.0 (exp (/ PI s)))))) 1.0))))