VandenBroeck and Keller, Equation (20)

Percentage Accurate: 6.6% → 96.7%
Time: 9.7s
Alternatives: 6
Speedup: 4.8×

Specification

?
\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_0 := \frac{\pi}{4} \cdot f\\ t_1 := e^{t\_0}\\ t_2 := e^{-t\_0}\\ -\frac{1}{\frac{\pi}{4}} \cdot \log \left(\frac{t\_1 + t\_2}{t\_1 - t\_2}\right) \end{array} \end{array} \]
(FPCore (f)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_0 (* (/ PI 4.0) f)) (t_1 (exp t_0)) (t_2 (exp (- t_0))))
   (- (* (/ 1.0 (/ PI 4.0)) (log (/ (+ t_1 t_2) (- t_1 t_2)))))))
double code(double f) {
	double t_0 = (((double) M_PI) / 4.0) * f;
	double t_1 = exp(t_0);
	double t_2 = exp(-t_0);
	return -((1.0 / (((double) M_PI) / 4.0)) * log(((t_1 + t_2) / (t_1 - t_2))));
}
public static double code(double f) {
	double t_0 = (Math.PI / 4.0) * f;
	double t_1 = Math.exp(t_0);
	double t_2 = Math.exp(-t_0);
	return -((1.0 / (Math.PI / 4.0)) * Math.log(((t_1 + t_2) / (t_1 - t_2))));
}
def code(f):
	t_0 = (math.pi / 4.0) * f
	t_1 = math.exp(t_0)
	t_2 = math.exp(-t_0)
	return -((1.0 / (math.pi / 4.0)) * math.log(((t_1 + t_2) / (t_1 - t_2))))
function code(f)
	t_0 = Float64(Float64(pi / 4.0) * f)
	t_1 = exp(t_0)
	t_2 = exp(Float64(-t_0))
	return Float64(-Float64(Float64(1.0 / Float64(pi / 4.0)) * log(Float64(Float64(t_1 + t_2) / Float64(t_1 - t_2)))))
end
function tmp = code(f)
	t_0 = (pi / 4.0) * f;
	t_1 = exp(t_0);
	t_2 = exp(-t_0);
	tmp = -((1.0 / (pi / 4.0)) * log(((t_1 + t_2) / (t_1 - t_2))));
end
code[f_] := Block[{t$95$0 = N[(N[(Pi / 4.0), $MachinePrecision] * f), $MachinePrecision]}, Block[{t$95$1 = N[Exp[t$95$0], $MachinePrecision]}, Block[{t$95$2 = N[Exp[(-t$95$0)], $MachinePrecision]}, (-N[(N[(1.0 / N[(Pi / 4.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] * N[Log[N[(N[(t$95$1 + t$95$2), $MachinePrecision] / N[(t$95$1 - t$95$2), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision])]]]
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\begin{array}{l}
t_0 := \frac{\pi}{4} \cdot f\\
t_1 := e^{t\_0}\\
t_2 := e^{-t\_0}\\
-\frac{1}{\frac{\pi}{4}} \cdot \log \left(\frac{t\_1 + t\_2}{t\_1 - t\_2}\right)
\end{array}
\end{array}

Local Percentage Accuracy vs ?

The average percentage accuracy by input value. Horizontal axis shows value of an input variable; the variable is choosen in the title. Vertical axis is accuracy; higher is better. Red represent the original program, while blue represents Herbie's suggestion. These can be toggled with buttons below the plot. The line is an average while dots represent individual samples.

Accuracy vs Speed?

Herbie found 6 alternatives:

AlternativeAccuracySpeedup
The accuracy (vertical axis) and speed (horizontal axis) of each alternatives. Up and to the right is better. The red square shows the initial program, and each blue circle shows an alternative.The line shows the best available speed-accuracy tradeoffs.

Initial Program: 6.6% accurate, 1.0× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_0 := \frac{\pi}{4} \cdot f\\ t_1 := e^{t\_0}\\ t_2 := e^{-t\_0}\\ -\frac{1}{\frac{\pi}{4}} \cdot \log \left(\frac{t\_1 + t\_2}{t\_1 - t\_2}\right) \end{array} \end{array} \]
(FPCore (f)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_0 (* (/ PI 4.0) f)) (t_1 (exp t_0)) (t_2 (exp (- t_0))))
   (- (* (/ 1.0 (/ PI 4.0)) (log (/ (+ t_1 t_2) (- t_1 t_2)))))))
double code(double f) {
	double t_0 = (((double) M_PI) / 4.0) * f;
	double t_1 = exp(t_0);
	double t_2 = exp(-t_0);
	return -((1.0 / (((double) M_PI) / 4.0)) * log(((t_1 + t_2) / (t_1 - t_2))));
}
public static double code(double f) {
	double t_0 = (Math.PI / 4.0) * f;
	double t_1 = Math.exp(t_0);
	double t_2 = Math.exp(-t_0);
	return -((1.0 / (Math.PI / 4.0)) * Math.log(((t_1 + t_2) / (t_1 - t_2))));
}
def code(f):
	t_0 = (math.pi / 4.0) * f
	t_1 = math.exp(t_0)
	t_2 = math.exp(-t_0)
	return -((1.0 / (math.pi / 4.0)) * math.log(((t_1 + t_2) / (t_1 - t_2))))
function code(f)
	t_0 = Float64(Float64(pi / 4.0) * f)
	t_1 = exp(t_0)
	t_2 = exp(Float64(-t_0))
	return Float64(-Float64(Float64(1.0 / Float64(pi / 4.0)) * log(Float64(Float64(t_1 + t_2) / Float64(t_1 - t_2)))))
end
function tmp = code(f)
	t_0 = (pi / 4.0) * f;
	t_1 = exp(t_0);
	t_2 = exp(-t_0);
	tmp = -((1.0 / (pi / 4.0)) * log(((t_1 + t_2) / (t_1 - t_2))));
end
code[f_] := Block[{t$95$0 = N[(N[(Pi / 4.0), $MachinePrecision] * f), $MachinePrecision]}, Block[{t$95$1 = N[Exp[t$95$0], $MachinePrecision]}, Block[{t$95$2 = N[Exp[(-t$95$0)], $MachinePrecision]}, (-N[(N[(1.0 / N[(Pi / 4.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] * N[Log[N[(N[(t$95$1 + t$95$2), $MachinePrecision] / N[(t$95$1 - t$95$2), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision])]]]
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\begin{array}{l}
t_0 := \frac{\pi}{4} \cdot f\\
t_1 := e^{t\_0}\\
t_2 := e^{-t\_0}\\
-\frac{1}{\frac{\pi}{4}} \cdot \log \left(\frac{t\_1 + t\_2}{t\_1 - t\_2}\right)
\end{array}
\end{array}

Alternative 1: 96.7% accurate, 1.0× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_0 := \left(f \cdot \pi\right) \cdot 0.25\\ t_1 := \sinh t\_0 \cdot 2\\ \frac{\log \left(\frac{e^{t\_0}}{t\_1} + \frac{e^{\left(f \cdot \pi\right) \cdot -0.25}}{t\_1}\right)}{\pi} \cdot -4 \end{array} \end{array} \]
(FPCore (f)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_0 (* (* f PI) 0.25)) (t_1 (* (sinh t_0) 2.0)))
   (*
    (/ (log (+ (/ (exp t_0) t_1) (/ (exp (* (* f PI) -0.25)) t_1))) PI)
    -4.0)))
double code(double f) {
	double t_0 = (f * ((double) M_PI)) * 0.25;
	double t_1 = sinh(t_0) * 2.0;
	return (log(((exp(t_0) / t_1) + (exp(((f * ((double) M_PI)) * -0.25)) / t_1))) / ((double) M_PI)) * -4.0;
}
public static double code(double f) {
	double t_0 = (f * Math.PI) * 0.25;
	double t_1 = Math.sinh(t_0) * 2.0;
	return (Math.log(((Math.exp(t_0) / t_1) + (Math.exp(((f * Math.PI) * -0.25)) / t_1))) / Math.PI) * -4.0;
}
def code(f):
	t_0 = (f * math.pi) * 0.25
	t_1 = math.sinh(t_0) * 2.0
	return (math.log(((math.exp(t_0) / t_1) + (math.exp(((f * math.pi) * -0.25)) / t_1))) / math.pi) * -4.0
function code(f)
	t_0 = Float64(Float64(f * pi) * 0.25)
	t_1 = Float64(sinh(t_0) * 2.0)
	return Float64(Float64(log(Float64(Float64(exp(t_0) / t_1) + Float64(exp(Float64(Float64(f * pi) * -0.25)) / t_1))) / pi) * -4.0)
end
function tmp = code(f)
	t_0 = (f * pi) * 0.25;
	t_1 = sinh(t_0) * 2.0;
	tmp = (log(((exp(t_0) / t_1) + (exp(((f * pi) * -0.25)) / t_1))) / pi) * -4.0;
end
code[f_] := Block[{t$95$0 = N[(N[(f * Pi), $MachinePrecision] * 0.25), $MachinePrecision]}, Block[{t$95$1 = N[(N[Sinh[t$95$0], $MachinePrecision] * 2.0), $MachinePrecision]}, N[(N[(N[Log[N[(N[(N[Exp[t$95$0], $MachinePrecision] / t$95$1), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[Exp[N[(N[(f * Pi), $MachinePrecision] * -0.25), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] / t$95$1), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] / Pi), $MachinePrecision] * -4.0), $MachinePrecision]]]
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\begin{array}{l}
t_0 := \left(f \cdot \pi\right) \cdot 0.25\\
t_1 := \sinh t\_0 \cdot 2\\
\frac{\log \left(\frac{e^{t\_0}}{t\_1} + \frac{e^{\left(f \cdot \pi\right) \cdot -0.25}}{t\_1}\right)}{\pi} \cdot -4
\end{array}
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Initial program 6.6%

    \[-\frac{1}{\frac{\pi}{4}} \cdot \log \left(\frac{e^{\frac{\pi}{4} \cdot f} + e^{-\frac{\pi}{4} \cdot f}}{e^{\frac{\pi}{4} \cdot f} - e^{-\frac{\pi}{4} \cdot f}}\right) \]
  2. Taylor expanded in f around inf

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-4 \cdot \frac{\log \left(\frac{e^{\mathsf{neg}\left(\frac{1}{4} \cdot \left(f \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right)\right)\right)} + e^{\frac{1}{4} \cdot \left(f \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right)\right)}}{e^{\frac{1}{4} \cdot \left(f \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right)\right)} - e^{\mathsf{neg}\left(\frac{1}{4} \cdot \left(f \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right)\right)\right)}}\right)}{\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}} \]
  3. Step-by-step derivation
    1. *-commutativeN/A

      \[\leadsto \frac{\log \left(\frac{e^{\mathsf{neg}\left(\frac{1}{4} \cdot \left(f \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right)\right)\right)} + e^{\frac{1}{4} \cdot \left(f \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right)\right)}}{e^{\frac{1}{4} \cdot \left(f \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right)\right)} - e^{\mathsf{neg}\left(\frac{1}{4} \cdot \left(f \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right)\right)\right)}}\right)}{\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)} \cdot \color{blue}{-4} \]
    2. lower-*.f64N/A

      \[\leadsto \frac{\log \left(\frac{e^{\mathsf{neg}\left(\frac{1}{4} \cdot \left(f \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right)\right)\right)} + e^{\frac{1}{4} \cdot \left(f \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right)\right)}}{e^{\frac{1}{4} \cdot \left(f \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right)\right)} - e^{\mathsf{neg}\left(\frac{1}{4} \cdot \left(f \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right)\right)\right)}}\right)}{\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)} \cdot \color{blue}{-4} \]
  4. Applied rewrites96.7%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{\log \left(\frac{2 \cdot \cosh \left(\left(\pi \cdot f\right) \cdot -0.25\right)}{2 \cdot \sinh \left(\left(\pi \cdot f\right) \cdot 0.25\right)}\right)}{\pi} \cdot -4} \]
  5. Applied rewrites96.7%

    \[\leadsto \frac{\log \left(\frac{e^{\left(f \cdot \pi\right) \cdot 0.25}}{\sinh \left(\left(f \cdot \pi\right) \cdot 0.25\right) \cdot 2} + \frac{e^{\left(f \cdot \pi\right) \cdot -0.25}}{\sinh \left(\left(f \cdot \pi\right) \cdot 0.25\right) \cdot 2}\right)}{\pi} \cdot -4 \]
  6. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 2: 96.7% accurate, 1.8× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_0 := \left(f \cdot \pi\right) \cdot 0.25\\ \frac{\log \left(\frac{\cosh t\_0}{\sinh t\_0}\right)}{\pi} \cdot -4 \end{array} \end{array} \]
(FPCore (f)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_0 (* (* f PI) 0.25)))
   (* (/ (log (/ (cosh t_0) (sinh t_0))) PI) -4.0)))
double code(double f) {
	double t_0 = (f * ((double) M_PI)) * 0.25;
	return (log((cosh(t_0) / sinh(t_0))) / ((double) M_PI)) * -4.0;
}
public static double code(double f) {
	double t_0 = (f * Math.PI) * 0.25;
	return (Math.log((Math.cosh(t_0) / Math.sinh(t_0))) / Math.PI) * -4.0;
}
def code(f):
	t_0 = (f * math.pi) * 0.25
	return (math.log((math.cosh(t_0) / math.sinh(t_0))) / math.pi) * -4.0
function code(f)
	t_0 = Float64(Float64(f * pi) * 0.25)
	return Float64(Float64(log(Float64(cosh(t_0) / sinh(t_0))) / pi) * -4.0)
end
function tmp = code(f)
	t_0 = (f * pi) * 0.25;
	tmp = (log((cosh(t_0) / sinh(t_0))) / pi) * -4.0;
end
code[f_] := Block[{t$95$0 = N[(N[(f * Pi), $MachinePrecision] * 0.25), $MachinePrecision]}, N[(N[(N[Log[N[(N[Cosh[t$95$0], $MachinePrecision] / N[Sinh[t$95$0], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] / Pi), $MachinePrecision] * -4.0), $MachinePrecision]]
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\begin{array}{l}
t_0 := \left(f \cdot \pi\right) \cdot 0.25\\
\frac{\log \left(\frac{\cosh t\_0}{\sinh t\_0}\right)}{\pi} \cdot -4
\end{array}
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Initial program 6.6%

    \[-\frac{1}{\frac{\pi}{4}} \cdot \log \left(\frac{e^{\frac{\pi}{4} \cdot f} + e^{-\frac{\pi}{4} \cdot f}}{e^{\frac{\pi}{4} \cdot f} - e^{-\frac{\pi}{4} \cdot f}}\right) \]
  2. Taylor expanded in f around inf

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-4 \cdot \frac{\log \left(\frac{e^{\mathsf{neg}\left(\frac{1}{4} \cdot \left(f \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right)\right)\right)} + e^{\frac{1}{4} \cdot \left(f \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right)\right)}}{e^{\frac{1}{4} \cdot \left(f \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right)\right)} - e^{\mathsf{neg}\left(\frac{1}{4} \cdot \left(f \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right)\right)\right)}}\right)}{\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}} \]
  3. Step-by-step derivation
    1. *-commutativeN/A

      \[\leadsto \frac{\log \left(\frac{e^{\mathsf{neg}\left(\frac{1}{4} \cdot \left(f \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right)\right)\right)} + e^{\frac{1}{4} \cdot \left(f \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right)\right)}}{e^{\frac{1}{4} \cdot \left(f \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right)\right)} - e^{\mathsf{neg}\left(\frac{1}{4} \cdot \left(f \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right)\right)\right)}}\right)}{\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)} \cdot \color{blue}{-4} \]
    2. lower-*.f64N/A

      \[\leadsto \frac{\log \left(\frac{e^{\mathsf{neg}\left(\frac{1}{4} \cdot \left(f \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right)\right)\right)} + e^{\frac{1}{4} \cdot \left(f \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right)\right)}}{e^{\frac{1}{4} \cdot \left(f \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right)\right)} - e^{\mathsf{neg}\left(\frac{1}{4} \cdot \left(f \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right)\right)\right)}}\right)}{\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)} \cdot \color{blue}{-4} \]
  4. Applied rewrites96.7%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{\log \left(\frac{2 \cdot \cosh \left(\left(\pi \cdot f\right) \cdot -0.25\right)}{2 \cdot \sinh \left(\left(\pi \cdot f\right) \cdot 0.25\right)}\right)}{\pi} \cdot -4} \]
  5. Applied rewrites96.7%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{\log \left(\frac{\cosh \left(\left(f \cdot \pi\right) \cdot 0.25\right)}{\sinh \left(\left(f \cdot \pi\right) \cdot 0.25\right)}\right)}{\pi} \cdot -4} \]
  6. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 3: 96.1% accurate, 1.9× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \frac{\log \left(\frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(0.03125 \cdot \left(f \cdot f\right), \pi \cdot \pi, 1\right)}{\sinh \left(\left(f \cdot \pi\right) \cdot 0.25\right)}\right)}{\pi} \cdot -4 \end{array} \]
(FPCore (f)
 :precision binary64
 (*
  (/
   (log (/ (fma (* 0.03125 (* f f)) (* PI PI) 1.0) (sinh (* (* f PI) 0.25))))
   PI)
  -4.0))
double code(double f) {
	return (log((fma((0.03125 * (f * f)), (((double) M_PI) * ((double) M_PI)), 1.0) / sinh(((f * ((double) M_PI)) * 0.25)))) / ((double) M_PI)) * -4.0;
}
function code(f)
	return Float64(Float64(log(Float64(fma(Float64(0.03125 * Float64(f * f)), Float64(pi * pi), 1.0) / sinh(Float64(Float64(f * pi) * 0.25)))) / pi) * -4.0)
end
code[f_] := N[(N[(N[Log[N[(N[(N[(0.03125 * N[(f * f), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] * N[(Pi * Pi), $MachinePrecision] + 1.0), $MachinePrecision] / N[Sinh[N[(N[(f * Pi), $MachinePrecision] * 0.25), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] / Pi), $MachinePrecision] * -4.0), $MachinePrecision]
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\frac{\log \left(\frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(0.03125 \cdot \left(f \cdot f\right), \pi \cdot \pi, 1\right)}{\sinh \left(\left(f \cdot \pi\right) \cdot 0.25\right)}\right)}{\pi} \cdot -4
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Initial program 6.6%

    \[-\frac{1}{\frac{\pi}{4}} \cdot \log \left(\frac{e^{\frac{\pi}{4} \cdot f} + e^{-\frac{\pi}{4} \cdot f}}{e^{\frac{\pi}{4} \cdot f} - e^{-\frac{\pi}{4} \cdot f}}\right) \]
  2. Taylor expanded in f around inf

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-4 \cdot \frac{\log \left(\frac{e^{\mathsf{neg}\left(\frac{1}{4} \cdot \left(f \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right)\right)\right)} + e^{\frac{1}{4} \cdot \left(f \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right)\right)}}{e^{\frac{1}{4} \cdot \left(f \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right)\right)} - e^{\mathsf{neg}\left(\frac{1}{4} \cdot \left(f \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right)\right)\right)}}\right)}{\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}} \]
  3. Step-by-step derivation
    1. *-commutativeN/A

      \[\leadsto \frac{\log \left(\frac{e^{\mathsf{neg}\left(\frac{1}{4} \cdot \left(f \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right)\right)\right)} + e^{\frac{1}{4} \cdot \left(f \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right)\right)}}{e^{\frac{1}{4} \cdot \left(f \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right)\right)} - e^{\mathsf{neg}\left(\frac{1}{4} \cdot \left(f \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right)\right)\right)}}\right)}{\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)} \cdot \color{blue}{-4} \]
    2. lower-*.f64N/A

      \[\leadsto \frac{\log \left(\frac{e^{\mathsf{neg}\left(\frac{1}{4} \cdot \left(f \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right)\right)\right)} + e^{\frac{1}{4} \cdot \left(f \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right)\right)}}{e^{\frac{1}{4} \cdot \left(f \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right)\right)} - e^{\mathsf{neg}\left(\frac{1}{4} \cdot \left(f \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right)\right)\right)}}\right)}{\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)} \cdot \color{blue}{-4} \]
  4. Applied rewrites96.7%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{\log \left(\frac{2 \cdot \cosh \left(\left(\pi \cdot f\right) \cdot -0.25\right)}{2 \cdot \sinh \left(\left(\pi \cdot f\right) \cdot 0.25\right)}\right)}{\pi} \cdot -4} \]
  5. Applied rewrites96.7%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{\log \left(\frac{\cosh \left(\left(f \cdot \pi\right) \cdot 0.25\right)}{\sinh \left(\left(f \cdot \pi\right) \cdot 0.25\right)}\right)}{\pi} \cdot -4} \]
  6. Taylor expanded in f around 0

    \[\leadsto \frac{\log \left(\frac{1 + \frac{1}{32} \cdot \left({f}^{2} \cdot {\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}^{2}\right)}{\sinh \left(\left(f \cdot \pi\right) \cdot \frac{1}{4}\right)}\right)}{\pi} \cdot -4 \]
  7. Step-by-step derivation
    1. +-commutativeN/A

      \[\leadsto \frac{\log \left(\frac{\frac{1}{32} \cdot \left({f}^{2} \cdot {\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}^{2}\right) + 1}{\sinh \left(\left(f \cdot \pi\right) \cdot \frac{1}{4}\right)}\right)}{\pi} \cdot -4 \]
    2. associate-*r*N/A

      \[\leadsto \frac{\log \left(\frac{\left(\frac{1}{32} \cdot {f}^{2}\right) \cdot {\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}^{2} + 1}{\sinh \left(\left(f \cdot \pi\right) \cdot \frac{1}{4}\right)}\right)}{\pi} \cdot -4 \]
    3. lower-fma.f64N/A

      \[\leadsto \frac{\log \left(\frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(\frac{1}{32} \cdot {f}^{2}, {\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}^{2}, 1\right)}{\sinh \left(\left(f \cdot \pi\right) \cdot \frac{1}{4}\right)}\right)}{\pi} \cdot -4 \]
    4. lower-*.f64N/A

      \[\leadsto \frac{\log \left(\frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(\frac{1}{32} \cdot {f}^{2}, {\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}^{2}, 1\right)}{\sinh \left(\left(f \cdot \pi\right) \cdot \frac{1}{4}\right)}\right)}{\pi} \cdot -4 \]
    5. unpow2N/A

      \[\leadsto \frac{\log \left(\frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(\frac{1}{32} \cdot \left(f \cdot f\right), {\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}^{2}, 1\right)}{\sinh \left(\left(f \cdot \pi\right) \cdot \frac{1}{4}\right)}\right)}{\pi} \cdot -4 \]
    6. lower-*.f64N/A

      \[\leadsto \frac{\log \left(\frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(\frac{1}{32} \cdot \left(f \cdot f\right), {\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}^{2}, 1\right)}{\sinh \left(\left(f \cdot \pi\right) \cdot \frac{1}{4}\right)}\right)}{\pi} \cdot -4 \]
    7. unpow2N/A

      \[\leadsto \frac{\log \left(\frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(\frac{1}{32} \cdot \left(f \cdot f\right), \mathsf{PI}\left(\right) \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right), 1\right)}{\sinh \left(\left(f \cdot \pi\right) \cdot \frac{1}{4}\right)}\right)}{\pi} \cdot -4 \]
    8. lower-*.f64N/A

      \[\leadsto \frac{\log \left(\frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(\frac{1}{32} \cdot \left(f \cdot f\right), \mathsf{PI}\left(\right) \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right), 1\right)}{\sinh \left(\left(f \cdot \pi\right) \cdot \frac{1}{4}\right)}\right)}{\pi} \cdot -4 \]
    9. lift-PI.f64N/A

      \[\leadsto \frac{\log \left(\frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(\frac{1}{32} \cdot \left(f \cdot f\right), \pi \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right), 1\right)}{\sinh \left(\left(f \cdot \pi\right) \cdot \frac{1}{4}\right)}\right)}{\pi} \cdot -4 \]
    10. lift-PI.f6496.1

      \[\leadsto \frac{\log \left(\frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(0.03125 \cdot \left(f \cdot f\right), \pi \cdot \pi, 1\right)}{\sinh \left(\left(f \cdot \pi\right) \cdot 0.25\right)}\right)}{\pi} \cdot -4 \]
  8. Applied rewrites96.1%

    \[\leadsto \frac{\log \left(\frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(0.03125 \cdot \left(f \cdot f\right), \pi \cdot \pi, 1\right)}{\sinh \left(\left(f \cdot \pi\right) \cdot 0.25\right)}\right)}{\pi} \cdot -4 \]
  9. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 4: 95.8% accurate, 2.2× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \frac{\log \left(\frac{2 \cdot \cosh \left(\left(\pi \cdot f\right) \cdot -0.25\right)}{\left(0.5 \cdot \pi\right) \cdot f}\right)}{\pi} \cdot -4 \end{array} \]
(FPCore (f)
 :precision binary64
 (* (/ (log (/ (* 2.0 (cosh (* (* PI f) -0.25))) (* (* 0.5 PI) f))) PI) -4.0))
double code(double f) {
	return (log(((2.0 * cosh(((((double) M_PI) * f) * -0.25))) / ((0.5 * ((double) M_PI)) * f))) / ((double) M_PI)) * -4.0;
}
public static double code(double f) {
	return (Math.log(((2.0 * Math.cosh(((Math.PI * f) * -0.25))) / ((0.5 * Math.PI) * f))) / Math.PI) * -4.0;
}
def code(f):
	return (math.log(((2.0 * math.cosh(((math.pi * f) * -0.25))) / ((0.5 * math.pi) * f))) / math.pi) * -4.0
function code(f)
	return Float64(Float64(log(Float64(Float64(2.0 * cosh(Float64(Float64(pi * f) * -0.25))) / Float64(Float64(0.5 * pi) * f))) / pi) * -4.0)
end
function tmp = code(f)
	tmp = (log(((2.0 * cosh(((pi * f) * -0.25))) / ((0.5 * pi) * f))) / pi) * -4.0;
end
code[f_] := N[(N[(N[Log[N[(N[(2.0 * N[Cosh[N[(N[(Pi * f), $MachinePrecision] * -0.25), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / N[(N[(0.5 * Pi), $MachinePrecision] * f), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] / Pi), $MachinePrecision] * -4.0), $MachinePrecision]
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\frac{\log \left(\frac{2 \cdot \cosh \left(\left(\pi \cdot f\right) \cdot -0.25\right)}{\left(0.5 \cdot \pi\right) \cdot f}\right)}{\pi} \cdot -4
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Initial program 6.6%

    \[-\frac{1}{\frac{\pi}{4}} \cdot \log \left(\frac{e^{\frac{\pi}{4} \cdot f} + e^{-\frac{\pi}{4} \cdot f}}{e^{\frac{\pi}{4} \cdot f} - e^{-\frac{\pi}{4} \cdot f}}\right) \]
  2. Taylor expanded in f around inf

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-4 \cdot \frac{\log \left(\frac{e^{\mathsf{neg}\left(\frac{1}{4} \cdot \left(f \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right)\right)\right)} + e^{\frac{1}{4} \cdot \left(f \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right)\right)}}{e^{\frac{1}{4} \cdot \left(f \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right)\right)} - e^{\mathsf{neg}\left(\frac{1}{4} \cdot \left(f \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right)\right)\right)}}\right)}{\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}} \]
  3. Step-by-step derivation
    1. *-commutativeN/A

      \[\leadsto \frac{\log \left(\frac{e^{\mathsf{neg}\left(\frac{1}{4} \cdot \left(f \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right)\right)\right)} + e^{\frac{1}{4} \cdot \left(f \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right)\right)}}{e^{\frac{1}{4} \cdot \left(f \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right)\right)} - e^{\mathsf{neg}\left(\frac{1}{4} \cdot \left(f \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right)\right)\right)}}\right)}{\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)} \cdot \color{blue}{-4} \]
    2. lower-*.f64N/A

      \[\leadsto \frac{\log \left(\frac{e^{\mathsf{neg}\left(\frac{1}{4} \cdot \left(f \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right)\right)\right)} + e^{\frac{1}{4} \cdot \left(f \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right)\right)}}{e^{\frac{1}{4} \cdot \left(f \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right)\right)} - e^{\mathsf{neg}\left(\frac{1}{4} \cdot \left(f \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right)\right)\right)}}\right)}{\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)} \cdot \color{blue}{-4} \]
  4. Applied rewrites96.7%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{\log \left(\frac{2 \cdot \cosh \left(\left(\pi \cdot f\right) \cdot -0.25\right)}{2 \cdot \sinh \left(\left(\pi \cdot f\right) \cdot 0.25\right)}\right)}{\pi} \cdot -4} \]
  5. Taylor expanded in f around 0

    \[\leadsto \frac{\log \left(\frac{2 \cdot \cosh \left(\left(\pi \cdot f\right) \cdot \frac{-1}{4}\right)}{f \cdot \left(\frac{1}{4} \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right) - \frac{-1}{4} \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right)\right)}\right)}{\pi} \cdot -4 \]
  6. Step-by-step derivation
    1. *-commutativeN/A

      \[\leadsto \frac{\log \left(\frac{2 \cdot \cosh \left(\left(\pi \cdot f\right) \cdot \frac{-1}{4}\right)}{\left(\frac{1}{4} \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right) - \frac{-1}{4} \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right)\right) \cdot f}\right)}{\pi} \cdot -4 \]
    2. lower-*.f64N/A

      \[\leadsto \frac{\log \left(\frac{2 \cdot \cosh \left(\left(\pi \cdot f\right) \cdot \frac{-1}{4}\right)}{\left(\frac{1}{4} \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right) - \frac{-1}{4} \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right)\right) \cdot f}\right)}{\pi} \cdot -4 \]
    3. distribute-rgt-out--N/A

      \[\leadsto \frac{\log \left(\frac{2 \cdot \cosh \left(\left(\pi \cdot f\right) \cdot \frac{-1}{4}\right)}{\left(\mathsf{PI}\left(\right) \cdot \left(\frac{1}{4} - \frac{-1}{4}\right)\right) \cdot f}\right)}{\pi} \cdot -4 \]
    4. metadata-evalN/A

      \[\leadsto \frac{\log \left(\frac{2 \cdot \cosh \left(\left(\pi \cdot f\right) \cdot \frac{-1}{4}\right)}{\left(\mathsf{PI}\left(\right) \cdot \frac{1}{2}\right) \cdot f}\right)}{\pi} \cdot -4 \]
    5. *-commutativeN/A

      \[\leadsto \frac{\log \left(\frac{2 \cdot \cosh \left(\left(\pi \cdot f\right) \cdot \frac{-1}{4}\right)}{\left(\frac{1}{2} \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right)\right) \cdot f}\right)}{\pi} \cdot -4 \]
    6. lower-*.f64N/A

      \[\leadsto \frac{\log \left(\frac{2 \cdot \cosh \left(\left(\pi \cdot f\right) \cdot \frac{-1}{4}\right)}{\left(\frac{1}{2} \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right)\right) \cdot f}\right)}{\pi} \cdot -4 \]
    7. lift-PI.f6495.8

      \[\leadsto \frac{\log \left(\frac{2 \cdot \cosh \left(\left(\pi \cdot f\right) \cdot -0.25\right)}{\left(0.5 \cdot \pi\right) \cdot f}\right)}{\pi} \cdot -4 \]
  7. Applied rewrites95.8%

    \[\leadsto \frac{\log \left(\frac{2 \cdot \cosh \left(\left(\pi \cdot f\right) \cdot -0.25\right)}{\left(0.5 \cdot \pi\right) \cdot f}\right)}{\pi} \cdot -4 \]
  8. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 5: 95.7% accurate, 3.2× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \frac{4}{\pi} \cdot \left(-\left(\left(-\log f\right) + \log \left(\frac{2}{0.5 \cdot \pi}\right)\right)\right) \end{array} \]
(FPCore (f)
 :precision binary64
 (* (/ 4.0 PI) (- (+ (- (log f)) (log (/ 2.0 (* 0.5 PI)))))))
double code(double f) {
	return (4.0 / ((double) M_PI)) * -(-log(f) + log((2.0 / (0.5 * ((double) M_PI)))));
}
public static double code(double f) {
	return (4.0 / Math.PI) * -(-Math.log(f) + Math.log((2.0 / (0.5 * Math.PI))));
}
def code(f):
	return (4.0 / math.pi) * -(-math.log(f) + math.log((2.0 / (0.5 * math.pi))))
function code(f)
	return Float64(Float64(4.0 / pi) * Float64(-Float64(Float64(-log(f)) + log(Float64(2.0 / Float64(0.5 * pi))))))
end
function tmp = code(f)
	tmp = (4.0 / pi) * -(-log(f) + log((2.0 / (0.5 * pi))));
end
code[f_] := N[(N[(4.0 / Pi), $MachinePrecision] * (-N[((-N[Log[f], $MachinePrecision]) + N[Log[N[(2.0 / N[(0.5 * Pi), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision])), $MachinePrecision]
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\frac{4}{\pi} \cdot \left(-\left(\left(-\log f\right) + \log \left(\frac{2}{0.5 \cdot \pi}\right)\right)\right)
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Initial program 6.6%

    \[-\frac{1}{\frac{\pi}{4}} \cdot \log \left(\frac{e^{\frac{\pi}{4} \cdot f} + e^{-\frac{\pi}{4} \cdot f}}{e^{\frac{\pi}{4} \cdot f} - e^{-\frac{\pi}{4} \cdot f}}\right) \]
  2. Taylor expanded in f around 0

    \[\leadsto -\frac{1}{\frac{\pi}{4}} \cdot \log \left(\frac{\color{blue}{1} + e^{-\frac{\pi}{4} \cdot f}}{e^{\frac{\pi}{4} \cdot f} - e^{-\frac{\pi}{4} \cdot f}}\right) \]
  3. Step-by-step derivation
    1. Applied rewrites5.3%

      \[\leadsto -\frac{1}{\frac{\pi}{4}} \cdot \log \left(\frac{\color{blue}{1} + e^{-\frac{\pi}{4} \cdot f}}{e^{\frac{\pi}{4} \cdot f} - e^{-\frac{\pi}{4} \cdot f}}\right) \]
    2. Taylor expanded in f around 0

      \[\leadsto -\frac{1}{\frac{\pi}{4}} \cdot \log \left(\frac{1 + e^{-\frac{\pi}{4} \cdot f}}{\color{blue}{1} - e^{-\frac{\pi}{4} \cdot f}}\right) \]
    3. Step-by-step derivation
      1. Applied rewrites6.6%

        \[\leadsto -\frac{1}{\frac{\pi}{4}} \cdot \log \left(\frac{1 + e^{-\frac{\pi}{4} \cdot f}}{\color{blue}{1} - e^{-\frac{\pi}{4} \cdot f}}\right) \]
      2. Step-by-step derivation
        1. lift-neg.f64N/A

          \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{neg}\left(\frac{1}{\frac{\pi}{4}} \cdot \log \left(\frac{1 + e^{-\frac{\pi}{4} \cdot f}}{1 - e^{-\frac{\pi}{4} \cdot f}}\right)\right)} \]
        2. lift-*.f64N/A

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{neg}\left(\color{blue}{\frac{1}{\frac{\pi}{4}} \cdot \log \left(\frac{1 + e^{-\frac{\pi}{4} \cdot f}}{1 - e^{-\frac{\pi}{4} \cdot f}}\right)}\right) \]
        3. distribute-rgt-neg-inN/A

          \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1}{\frac{\pi}{4}} \cdot \left(\mathsf{neg}\left(\log \left(\frac{1 + e^{-\frac{\pi}{4} \cdot f}}{1 - e^{-\frac{\pi}{4} \cdot f}}\right)\right)\right)} \]
        4. lower-*.f64N/A

          \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1}{\frac{\pi}{4}} \cdot \left(\mathsf{neg}\left(\log \left(\frac{1 + e^{-\frac{\pi}{4} \cdot f}}{1 - e^{-\frac{\pi}{4} \cdot f}}\right)\right)\right)} \]
      3. Applied rewrites6.6%

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{4}{\pi} \cdot \left(-\log \left(\frac{e^{\frac{\pi}{4} \cdot \left(-f\right)} + 1}{1 - e^{\frac{\pi}{4} \cdot \left(-f\right)}}\right)\right)} \]
      4. Taylor expanded in f around 0

        \[\leadsto \frac{4}{\pi} \cdot \left(-\log \left(\frac{\color{blue}{1} + 1}{1 - e^{\frac{\pi}{4} \cdot \left(-f\right)}}\right)\right) \]
      5. Step-by-step derivation
        1. Applied rewrites4.3%

          \[\leadsto \frac{4}{\pi} \cdot \left(-\log \left(\frac{\color{blue}{1} + 1}{1 - e^{\frac{\pi}{4} \cdot \left(-f\right)}}\right)\right) \]
        2. Taylor expanded in f around 0

          \[\leadsto \frac{4}{\pi} \cdot \left(-\log \left(\frac{1 + 1}{1 - \color{blue}{1}}\right)\right) \]
        3. Step-by-step derivation
          1. Applied rewrites3.1%

            \[\leadsto \frac{4}{\pi} \cdot \left(-\log \left(\frac{1 + 1}{1 - \color{blue}{1}}\right)\right) \]
          2. Taylor expanded in f around 0

            \[\leadsto \frac{4}{\pi} \cdot \left(-\color{blue}{\left(\log \left(\frac{2}{\frac{1}{4} \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right) - \frac{-1}{4} \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}\right) + -1 \cdot \log f\right)}\right) \]
          3. Applied rewrites95.7%

            \[\leadsto \frac{4}{\pi} \cdot \left(-\color{blue}{\left(\left(-\log f\right) + \log \left(\frac{2}{0.5 \cdot \pi}\right)\right)}\right) \]
          4. Add Preprocessing

          Alternative 6: 95.7% accurate, 4.8× speedup?

          \[\begin{array}{l} \\ \frac{\log \left(\frac{4}{f \cdot \pi}\right)}{\pi} \cdot -4 \end{array} \]
          (FPCore (f) :precision binary64 (* (/ (log (/ 4.0 (* f PI))) PI) -4.0))
          double code(double f) {
          	return (log((4.0 / (f * ((double) M_PI)))) / ((double) M_PI)) * -4.0;
          }
          
          public static double code(double f) {
          	return (Math.log((4.0 / (f * Math.PI))) / Math.PI) * -4.0;
          }
          
          def code(f):
          	return (math.log((4.0 / (f * math.pi))) / math.pi) * -4.0
          
          function code(f)
          	return Float64(Float64(log(Float64(4.0 / Float64(f * pi))) / pi) * -4.0)
          end
          
          function tmp = code(f)
          	tmp = (log((4.0 / (f * pi))) / pi) * -4.0;
          end
          
          code[f_] := N[(N[(N[Log[N[(4.0 / N[(f * Pi), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] / Pi), $MachinePrecision] * -4.0), $MachinePrecision]
          
          \begin{array}{l}
          
          \\
          \frac{\log \left(\frac{4}{f \cdot \pi}\right)}{\pi} \cdot -4
          \end{array}
          
          Derivation
          1. Initial program 6.6%

            \[-\frac{1}{\frac{\pi}{4}} \cdot \log \left(\frac{e^{\frac{\pi}{4} \cdot f} + e^{-\frac{\pi}{4} \cdot f}}{e^{\frac{\pi}{4} \cdot f} - e^{-\frac{\pi}{4} \cdot f}}\right) \]
          2. Taylor expanded in f around 0

            \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-4 \cdot \frac{\log \left(\frac{2}{\frac{1}{4} \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right) - \frac{-1}{4} \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}\right) + -1 \cdot \log f}{\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}} \]
          3. Step-by-step derivation
            1. *-commutativeN/A

              \[\leadsto \frac{\log \left(\frac{2}{\frac{1}{4} \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right) - \frac{-1}{4} \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}\right) + -1 \cdot \log f}{\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)} \cdot \color{blue}{-4} \]
            2. lower-*.f64N/A

              \[\leadsto \frac{\log \left(\frac{2}{\frac{1}{4} \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right) - \frac{-1}{4} \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}\right) + -1 \cdot \log f}{\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)} \cdot \color{blue}{-4} \]
          4. Applied rewrites95.7%

            \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{\log \left(\frac{2}{\left(\pi \cdot 0.5\right) \cdot f}\right)}{\pi} \cdot -4} \]
          5. Taylor expanded in f around 0

            \[\leadsto \frac{\log \left(\frac{4}{f \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}\right)}{\pi} \cdot -4 \]
          6. Step-by-step derivation
            1. lower-/.f64N/A

              \[\leadsto \frac{\log \left(\frac{4}{f \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}\right)}{\pi} \cdot -4 \]
            2. lower-*.f64N/A

              \[\leadsto \frac{\log \left(\frac{4}{f \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}\right)}{\pi} \cdot -4 \]
            3. lift-PI.f6495.7

              \[\leadsto \frac{\log \left(\frac{4}{f \cdot \pi}\right)}{\pi} \cdot -4 \]
          7. Applied rewrites95.7%

            \[\leadsto \frac{\log \left(\frac{4}{f \cdot \pi}\right)}{\pi} \cdot -4 \]
          8. Add Preprocessing

          Reproduce

          ?
          herbie shell --seed 2025120 
          (FPCore (f)
            :name "VandenBroeck and Keller, Equation (20)"
            :precision binary64
            (- (* (/ 1.0 (/ PI 4.0)) (log (/ (+ (exp (* (/ PI 4.0) f)) (exp (- (* (/ PI 4.0) f)))) (- (exp (* (/ PI 4.0) f)) (exp (- (* (/ PI 4.0) f)))))))))