Graphics.Rasterific.CubicBezier:cachedBezierAt from Rasterific-0.6.1

Percentage Accurate: 92.7% → 96.6%

Time: 3.2s

Alternatives: 10

Speedup: 0.5×

• 31.4% of points produce a very large (infinite) output. You may want to add a precondition.

Specification

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b)
 :precision binary64
 (+ (+ (+ x (* y z)) (* t a)) (* (* a z) b)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	return ((x + (y * z)) + (t * a)) + ((a * z) * b);
}

Fortran

module fmin_fmax_functions
    implicit none
    private
    public fmax
    public fmin

    interface fmax
        module procedure fmax88
        module procedure fmax44
        module procedure fmax84
        module procedure fmax48
    end interface
    interface fmin
        module procedure fmin88
        module procedure fmin44
        module procedure fmin84
        module procedure fmin48
    end interface
contains
    real(8) function fmax88(x, y) result (res)
        real(8), intent (in) :: x
        real(8), intent (in) :: y
        res = merge(y, merge(x, max(x, y), y /= y), x /= x)
    end function
    real(4) function fmax44(x, y) result (res)
        real(4), intent (in) :: x
        real(4), intent (in) :: y
        res = merge(y, merge(x, max(x, y), y /= y), x /= x)
    end function
    real(8) function fmax84(x, y) result(res)
        real(8), intent (in) :: x
        real(4), intent (in) :: y
        res = merge(dble(y), merge(x, max(x, dble(y)), y /= y), x /= x)
    end function
    real(8) function fmax48(x, y) result(res)
        real(4), intent (in) :: x
        real(8), intent (in) :: y
        res = merge(y, merge(dble(x), max(dble(x), y), y /= y), x /= x)
    end function
    real(8) function fmin88(x, y) result (res)
        real(8), intent (in) :: x
        real(8), intent (in) :: y
        res = merge(y, merge(x, min(x, y), y /= y), x /= x)
    end function
    real(4) function fmin44(x, y) result (res)
        real(4), intent (in) :: x
        real(4), intent (in) :: y
        res = merge(y, merge(x, min(x, y), y /= y), x /= x)
    end function
    real(8) function fmin84(x, y) result(res)
        real(8), intent (in) :: x
        real(4), intent (in) :: y
        res = merge(dble(y), merge(x, min(x, dble(y)), y /= y), x /= x)
    end function
    real(8) function fmin48(x, y) result(res)
        real(4), intent (in) :: x
        real(8), intent (in) :: y
        res = merge(y, merge(dble(x), min(dble(x), y), y /= y), x /= x)
    end function
end module

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
use fmin_fmax_functions
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    code = ((x + (y * z)) + (t * a)) + ((a * z) * b)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	return ((x + (y * z)) + (t * a)) + ((a * z) * b);
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b):
	return ((x + (y * z)) + (t * a)) + ((a * z) * b)

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(x + Float64(y * z)) + Float64(t * a)) + Float64(Float64(a * z) * b))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = ((x + (y * z)) + (t * a)) + ((a * z) * b);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := N[(N[(N[(x + N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(t * a), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(a * z), $MachinePrecision] * b), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Initial Program: 92.7% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b)
 :precision binary64
 (+ (+ (+ x (* y z)) (* t a)) (* (* a z) b)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	return ((x + (y * z)) + (t * a)) + ((a * z) * b);
}

Fortran

module fmin_fmax_functions
    implicit none
    private
    public fmax
    public fmin

    interface fmax
        module procedure fmax88
        module procedure fmax44
        module procedure fmax84
        module procedure fmax48
    end interface
    interface fmin
        module procedure fmin88
        module procedure fmin44
        module procedure fmin84
        module procedure fmin48
    end interface
contains
    real(8) function fmax88(x, y) result (res)
        real(8), intent (in) :: x
        real(8), intent (in) :: y
        res = merge(y, merge(x, max(x, y), y /= y), x /= x)
    end function
    real(4) function fmax44(x, y) result (res)
        real(4), intent (in) :: x
        real(4), intent (in) :: y
        res = merge(y, merge(x, max(x, y), y /= y), x /= x)
    end function
    real(8) function fmax84(x, y) result(res)
        real(8), intent (in) :: x
        real(4), intent (in) :: y
        res = merge(dble(y), merge(x, max(x, dble(y)), y /= y), x /= x)
    end function
    real(8) function fmax48(x, y) result(res)
        real(4), intent (in) :: x
        real(8), intent (in) :: y
        res = merge(y, merge(dble(x), max(dble(x), y), y /= y), x /= x)
    end function
    real(8) function fmin88(x, y) result (res)
        real(8), intent (in) :: x
        real(8), intent (in) :: y
        res = merge(y, merge(x, min(x, y), y /= y), x /= x)
    end function
    real(4) function fmin44(x, y) result (res)
        real(4), intent (in) :: x
        real(4), intent (in) :: y
        res = merge(y, merge(x, min(x, y), y /= y), x /= x)
    end function
    real(8) function fmin84(x, y) result(res)
        real(8), intent (in) :: x
        real(4), intent (in) :: y
        res = merge(dble(y), merge(x, min(x, dble(y)), y /= y), x /= x)
    end function
    real(8) function fmin48(x, y) result(res)
        real(4), intent (in) :: x
        real(8), intent (in) :: y
        res = merge(y, merge(dble(x), min(dble(x), y), y /= y), x /= x)
    end function
end module

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
use fmin_fmax_functions
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    code = ((x + (y * z)) + (t * a)) + ((a * z) * b)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	return ((x + (y * z)) + (t * a)) + ((a * z) * b);
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b):
	return ((x + (y * z)) + (t * a)) + ((a * z) * b)

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(x + Float64(y * z)) + Float64(t * a)) + Float64(Float64(a * z) * b))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = ((x + (y * z)) + (t * a)) + ((a * z) * b);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := N[(N[(N[(x + N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(t * a), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(a * z), $MachinePrecision] * b), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Alternative 1: 96.6% accurate, 0.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_1 := \left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b\\ \mathbf{if}\;t\_1 \leq \infty:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_1\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(b, z, t\right), a, x\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_1 (+ (+ (+ x (* y z)) (* t a)) (* (* a z) b))))
   (if (<= t_1 INFINITY) t_1 (fma (fma b z t) a x))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double t_1 = ((x + (y * z)) + (t * a)) + ((a * z) * b);
	double tmp;
	if (t_1 <= ((double) INFINITY)) {
		tmp = t_1;
	} else {
		tmp = fma(fma(b, z, t), a, x);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	t_1 = Float64(Float64(Float64(x + Float64(y * z)) + Float64(t * a)) + Float64(Float64(a * z) * b))
	tmp = 0.0
	if (t_1 <= Inf)
		tmp = t_1;
	else
		tmp = fma(fma(b, z, t), a, x);
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := Block[{t$95$1 = N[(N[(N[(x + N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(t * a), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(a * z), $MachinePrecision] * b), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[t$95$1, Infinity], t$95$1, N[(N[(b * z + t), $MachinePrecision] * a + x), $MachinePrecision]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (+.f64 (+.f64 (+.f64 x (*.f64 y z)) (*.f64 t a)) (*.f64 (*.f64 a z) b)) < +inf.0

   1. Initial program 97.7%

      \[\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \]

   if +inf.0 < (+.f64 (+.f64 (+.f64 x (*.f64 y z)) (*.f64 t a)) (*.f64 (*.f64 a z) b))

   1. Initial program 0.0%

      \[\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \]

   2. Taylor expanded in y around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \left(a \cdot t + a \cdot \left(b \cdot z\right)\right)} \]
   3. Step-by-step derivation

      1. distribute-lft-in N/A

         \[\leadsto x + a \cdot \color{blue}{\left(t + b \cdot z\right)} \]

      2. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \left(t + b \cdot z\right) + \color{blue}{x} \]

      3. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \left(t + b \cdot z\right) \cdot a + x \]

      4. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(t + b \cdot z, \color{blue}{a}, x\right) \]

      5. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(b \cdot z + t, a, x\right) \]

      6. lower-fma.f64 75.7

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(b, z, t\right), a, x\right) \]

   4. Applied rewrites 75.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(b, z, t\right), a, x\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 2: 87.5% accurate, 1.1× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_1 := \mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(b, z, t\right), a, x\right)\\ \mathbf{if}\;a \leq -7.2 \cdot 10^{+43}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_1\\ \mathbf{elif}\;a \leq 1.75 \cdot 10^{+67}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(a, t, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, y, x\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_1\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_1 (fma (fma b z t) a x)))
   (if (<= a -7.2e+43) t_1 (if (<= a 1.75e+67) (fma a t (fma z y x)) t_1))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double t_1 = fma(fma(b, z, t), a, x);
	double tmp;
	if (a <= -7.2e+43) {
		tmp = t_1;
	} else if (a <= 1.75e+67) {
		tmp = fma(a, t, fma(z, y, x));
	} else {
		tmp = t_1;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	t_1 = fma(fma(b, z, t), a, x)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (a <= -7.2e+43)
		tmp = t_1;
	elseif (a <= 1.75e+67)
		tmp = fma(a, t, fma(z, y, x));
	else
		tmp = t_1;
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := Block[{t$95$1 = N[(N[(b * z + t), $MachinePrecision] * a + x), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[a, -7.2e+43], t$95$1, If[LessEqual[a, 1.75e+67], N[(a * t + N[(z * y + x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], t$95$1]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if a < -7.2000000000000002e43 or 1.75e67 < a

   1. Initial program 84.8%

      \[\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \]

   2. Taylor expanded in y around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \left(a \cdot t + a \cdot \left(b \cdot z\right)\right)} \]
   3. Step-by-step derivation

      1. distribute-lft-in N/A

         \[\leadsto x + a \cdot \color{blue}{\left(t + b \cdot z\right)} \]

      2. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \left(t + b \cdot z\right) + \color{blue}{x} \]

      3. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \left(t + b \cdot z\right) \cdot a + x \]

      4. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(t + b \cdot z, \color{blue}{a}, x\right) \]

      5. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(b \cdot z + t, a, x\right) \]

      6. lower-fma.f64 91.4

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(b, z, t\right), a, x\right) \]

   4. Applied rewrites 91.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(b, z, t\right), a, x\right)} \]

   if -7.2000000000000002e43 < a < 1.75e67

   1. Initial program 98.2%

      \[\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \]

   2. Taylor expanded in b around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \left(a \cdot t + y \cdot z\right)} \]
   3. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto x + \left(y \cdot z + \color{blue}{a \cdot t}\right) \]

      2. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto x + \left(y \cdot z + t \cdot \color{blue}{a}\right) \]

      3. associate-+l+ N/A

         \[\leadsto \left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \color{blue}{t \cdot a} \]

      4. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto t \cdot a + \color{blue}{\left(x + y \cdot z\right)} \]

      5. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto a \cdot t + \left(\color{blue}{x} + y \cdot z\right) \]

      6. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(a, \color{blue}{t}, x + y \cdot z\right) \]

      7. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(a, t, y \cdot z + x\right) \]

      8. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(a, t, z \cdot y + x\right) \]

      9. lower-fma.f64 84.7

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(a, t, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, y, x\right)\right) \]

   4. Applied rewrites 84.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(a, t, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, y, x\right)\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 3: 83.3% accurate, 1.1× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_1 := \mathsf{fma}\left(a \cdot z, b, x\right)\\ \mathbf{if}\;b \leq -1.5 \cdot 10^{+156}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_1\\ \mathbf{elif}\;b \leq 1.45 \cdot 10^{+164}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(a, t, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, y, x\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_1\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_1 (fma (* a z) b x)))
   (if (<= b -1.5e+156) t_1 (if (<= b 1.45e+164) (fma a t (fma z y x)) t_1))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double t_1 = fma((a * z), b, x);
	double tmp;
	if (b <= -1.5e+156) {
		tmp = t_1;
	} else if (b <= 1.45e+164) {
		tmp = fma(a, t, fma(z, y, x));
	} else {
		tmp = t_1;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	t_1 = fma(Float64(a * z), b, x)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (b <= -1.5e+156)
		tmp = t_1;
	elseif (b <= 1.45e+164)
		tmp = fma(a, t, fma(z, y, x));
	else
		tmp = t_1;
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := Block[{t$95$1 = N[(N[(a * z), $MachinePrecision] * b + x), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[b, -1.5e+156], t$95$1, If[LessEqual[b, 1.45e+164], N[(a * t + N[(z * y + x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], t$95$1]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if b < -1.5e156 or 1.4499999999999999e164 < b

   1. Initial program 90.2%

      \[\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \]

   2. Taylor expanded in x around inf

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \]
   3. Step-by-step derivation

   4. Applied rewrites 75.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \]
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. lift-+.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b} \]

      2. lift-*.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b} \]

      3. lift-*.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(a \cdot z\right)} \cdot b \]

      4. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b + x} \]

      5. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(a \cdot z, b, x\right)} \]

      6. lift-*.f64 75.8

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{a \cdot z}, b, x\right) \]

      7. +-commutative 75.8

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(a \cdot z, b, x\right) \]

      8. *-commutative 75.8

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(a \cdot z, b, x\right) \]

      9. +-commutative 75.8

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(a \cdot z, b, x\right) \]

      10. *-commutative 75.8

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(a \cdot z, b, x\right) \]

   6. Applied rewrites 75.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(a \cdot z, b, x\right)} \]

   if -1.5e156 < b < 1.4499999999999999e164

   1. Initial program 93.5%

      \[\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \]

   2. Taylor expanded in b around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \left(a \cdot t + y \cdot z\right)} \]
   3. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto x + \left(y \cdot z + \color{blue}{a \cdot t}\right) \]

      2. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto x + \left(y \cdot z + t \cdot \color{blue}{a}\right) \]

      3. associate-+l+ N/A

         \[\leadsto \left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \color{blue}{t \cdot a} \]

      4. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto t \cdot a + \color{blue}{\left(x + y \cdot z\right)} \]

      5. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto a \cdot t + \left(\color{blue}{x} + y \cdot z\right) \]

      6. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(a, \color{blue}{t}, x + y \cdot z\right) \]

      7. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(a, t, y \cdot z + x\right) \]

      8. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(a, t, z \cdot y + x\right) \]

      9. lower-fma.f64 85.7

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(a, t, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, y, x\right)\right) \]

   4. Applied rewrites 85.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(a, t, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, y, x\right)\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 4: 74.1% accurate, 1.3× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_1 := \mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, y\right) \cdot z\\ \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -1.82 \cdot 10^{+37}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_1\\ \mathbf{elif}\;z \leq 750000000:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(a, t, x\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_1\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_1 (* (fma b a y) z)))
   (if (<= z -1.82e+37) t_1 (if (<= z 750000000.0) (fma a t x) t_1))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double t_1 = fma(b, a, y) * z;
	double tmp;
	if (z <= -1.82e+37) {
		tmp = t_1;
	} else if (z <= 750000000.0) {
		tmp = fma(a, t, x);
	} else {
		tmp = t_1;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	t_1 = Float64(fma(b, a, y) * z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (z <= -1.82e+37)
		tmp = t_1;
	elseif (z <= 750000000.0)
		tmp = fma(a, t, x);
	else
		tmp = t_1;
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := Block[{t$95$1 = N[(N[(b * a + y), $MachinePrecision] * z), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[z, -1.82e+37], t$95$1, If[LessEqual[z, 750000000.0], N[(a * t + x), $MachinePrecision], t$95$1]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if z < -1.81999999999999998e37 or 7.5e8 < z

   1. Initial program 85.9%

      \[\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \]

   2. Taylor expanded in z around inf

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(y + a \cdot b\right)} \]
   3. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \left(y + a \cdot b\right) \cdot \color{blue}{z} \]

      2. lower-*.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \left(y + a \cdot b\right) \cdot \color{blue}{z} \]

      3. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \left(a \cdot b + y\right) \cdot z \]

      4. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \left(b \cdot a + y\right) \cdot z \]

      5. lower-fma.f64 76.2

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, y\right) \cdot z \]

   4. Applied rewrites 76.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, y\right) \cdot z} \]

   if -1.81999999999999998e37 < z < 7.5e8

   1. Initial program 98.4%

      \[\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \]

   2. Taylor expanded in z around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + a \cdot t} \]
   3. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto a \cdot t + \color{blue}{x} \]

      2. lower-fma.f64 72.4

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(a, \color{blue}{t}, x\right) \]

   4. Applied rewrites 72.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(a, t, x\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 5: 62.9% accurate, 1.6× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;a \leq -1.3 \cdot 10^{+65}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b\\ \mathbf{elif}\;a \leq 9.2 \cdot 10^{-75}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(z, y, x\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(a, t, x\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= a -1.3e+65)
   (* (* a z) b)
   (if (<= a 9.2e-75) (fma z y x) (fma a t x))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if (a <= -1.3e+65) {
		tmp = (a * z) * b;
	} else if (a <= 9.2e-75) {
		tmp = fma(z, y, x);
	} else {
		tmp = fma(a, t, x);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (a <= -1.3e+65)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(a * z) * b);
	elseif (a <= 9.2e-75)
		tmp = fma(z, y, x);
	else
		tmp = fma(a, t, x);
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := If[LessEqual[a, -1.3e+65], N[(N[(a * z), $MachinePrecision] * b), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[a, 9.2e-75], N[(z * y + x), $MachinePrecision], N[(a * t + x), $MachinePrecision]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if a < -1.30000000000000001e65

   1. Initial program 84.5%

      \[\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \]

   2. Taylor expanded in b around inf

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(b \cdot z\right)} \]
   3. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \left(b \cdot z\right) \cdot \color{blue}{a} \]

      2. lower-*.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \left(b \cdot z\right) \cdot \color{blue}{a} \]

      3. lower-*.f64 43.6

         \[\leadsto \left(b \cdot z\right) \cdot a \]

   4. Applied rewrites 43.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(b \cdot z\right) \cdot a} \]
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. lift-*.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \left(b \cdot z\right) \cdot \color{blue}{a} \]

      2. lift-*.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \left(b \cdot z\right) \cdot a \]

      3. associate-*l* N/A

         \[\leadsto b \cdot \color{blue}{\left(z \cdot a\right)} \]

      4. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto b \cdot \left(a \cdot \color{blue}{z}\right) \]

      5. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot \color{blue}{b} \]

      6. lower-*.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot \color{blue}{b} \]

      7. lift-*.f64 43.8

         \[\leadsto \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \]

   6. Applied rewrites 43.8%

      \[\leadsto \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot \color{blue}{b} \]

   if -1.30000000000000001e65 < a < 9.2e-75

   1. Initial program 98.3%

      \[\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \]

   2. Taylor expanded in a around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + y \cdot z} \]
   3. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto y \cdot z + \color{blue}{x} \]

      2. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto z \cdot y + x \]

      3. lower-fma.f64 72.9

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z, \color{blue}{y}, x\right) \]

   4. Applied rewrites 72.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, y, x\right)} \]

   if 9.2e-75 < a

   1. Initial program 89.2%

      \[\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \]

   2. Taylor expanded in z around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + a \cdot t} \]
   3. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto a \cdot t + \color{blue}{x} \]

      2. lower-fma.f64 54.4

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(a, \color{blue}{t}, x\right) \]

   4. Applied rewrites 54.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(a, t, x\right)} \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.
4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 6: 61.3% accurate, 1.6× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;t \leq -3.45 \cdot 10^{+130}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(a, t, x\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;t \leq 6.5 \cdot 10^{+34}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(z, y, x\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(a, t, x\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= t -3.45e+130)
   (fma a t x)
   (if (<= t 6.5e+34) (fma z y x) (fma a t x))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if (t <= -3.45e+130) {
		tmp = fma(a, t, x);
	} else if (t <= 6.5e+34) {
		tmp = fma(z, y, x);
	} else {
		tmp = fma(a, t, x);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (t <= -3.45e+130)
		tmp = fma(a, t, x);
	elseif (t <= 6.5e+34)
		tmp = fma(z, y, x);
	else
		tmp = fma(a, t, x);
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := If[LessEqual[t, -3.45e+130], N[(a * t + x), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[t, 6.5e+34], N[(z * y + x), $MachinePrecision], N[(a * t + x), $MachinePrecision]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if t < -3.4500000000000001e130 or 6.50000000000000017e34 < t

   1. Initial program 90.6%

      \[\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \]

   2. Taylor expanded in z around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + a \cdot t} \]
   3. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto a \cdot t + \color{blue}{x} \]

      2. lower-fma.f64 69.9

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(a, \color{blue}{t}, x\right) \]

   4. Applied rewrites 69.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(a, t, x\right)} \]

   if -3.4500000000000001e130 < t < 6.50000000000000017e34

   1. Initial program 93.9%

      \[\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \]

   2. Taylor expanded in a around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + y \cdot z} \]
   3. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto y \cdot z + \color{blue}{x} \]

      2. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto z \cdot y + x \]

      3. lower-fma.f64 58.8

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z, \color{blue}{y}, x\right) \]

   4. Applied rewrites 58.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, y, x\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 7: 58.4% accurate, 1.6× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -1.25 \cdot 10^{+41}:\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot y\\ \mathbf{elif}\;z \leq 8500000000:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(a, t, x\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot y\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= z -1.25e+41) (* z y) (if (<= z 8500000000.0) (fma a t x) (* z y))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if (z <= -1.25e+41) {
		tmp = z * y;
	} else if (z <= 8500000000.0) {
		tmp = fma(a, t, x);
	} else {
		tmp = z * y;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (z <= -1.25e+41)
		tmp = Float64(z * y);
	elseif (z <= 8500000000.0)
		tmp = fma(a, t, x);
	else
		tmp = Float64(z * y);
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := If[LessEqual[z, -1.25e+41], N[(z * y), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[z, 8500000000.0], N[(a * t + x), $MachinePrecision], N[(z * y), $MachinePrecision]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if z < -1.25000000000000006e41 or 8.5e9 < z

   1. Initial program 85.7%

      \[\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \]

   2. Taylor expanded in y around inf

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot z} \]
   3. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto z \cdot \color{blue}{y} \]

      2. lower-*.f64 41.4

         \[\leadsto z \cdot \color{blue}{y} \]

   4. Applied rewrites 41.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot y} \]

   if -1.25000000000000006e41 < z < 8.5e9

   1. Initial program 98.4%

      \[\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \]

   2. Taylor expanded in z around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + a \cdot t} \]
   3. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto a \cdot t + \color{blue}{x} \]

      2. lower-fma.f64 72.2

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(a, \color{blue}{t}, x\right) \]

   4. Applied rewrites 72.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(a, t, x\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 8: 40.1% accurate, 1.4× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -2.55 \cdot 10^{-53}:\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot y\\ \mathbf{elif}\;z \leq 2.7 \cdot 10^{-110}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \mathbf{elif}\;z \leq 15000000:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot t\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot y\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= z -2.55e-53)
   (* z y)
   (if (<= z 2.7e-110) x (if (<= z 15000000.0) (* a t) (* z y)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if (z <= -2.55e-53) {
		tmp = z * y;
	} else if (z <= 2.7e-110) {
		tmp = x;
	} else if (z <= 15000000.0) {
		tmp = a * t;
	} else {
		tmp = z * y;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

module fmin_fmax_functions
    implicit none
    private
    public fmax
    public fmin

    interface fmax
        module procedure fmax88
        module procedure fmax44
        module procedure fmax84
        module procedure fmax48
    end interface
    interface fmin
        module procedure fmin88
        module procedure fmin44
        module procedure fmin84
        module procedure fmin48
    end interface
contains
    real(8) function fmax88(x, y) result (res)
        real(8), intent (in) :: x
        real(8), intent (in) :: y
        res = merge(y, merge(x, max(x, y), y /= y), x /= x)
    end function
    real(4) function fmax44(x, y) result (res)
        real(4), intent (in) :: x
        real(4), intent (in) :: y
        res = merge(y, merge(x, max(x, y), y /= y), x /= x)
    end function
    real(8) function fmax84(x, y) result(res)
        real(8), intent (in) :: x
        real(4), intent (in) :: y
        res = merge(dble(y), merge(x, max(x, dble(y)), y /= y), x /= x)
    end function
    real(8) function fmax48(x, y) result(res)
        real(4), intent (in) :: x
        real(8), intent (in) :: y
        res = merge(y, merge(dble(x), max(dble(x), y), y /= y), x /= x)
    end function
    real(8) function fmin88(x, y) result (res)
        real(8), intent (in) :: x
        real(8), intent (in) :: y
        res = merge(y, merge(x, min(x, y), y /= y), x /= x)
    end function
    real(4) function fmin44(x, y) result (res)
        real(4), intent (in) :: x
        real(4), intent (in) :: y
        res = merge(y, merge(x, min(x, y), y /= y), x /= x)
    end function
    real(8) function fmin84(x, y) result(res)
        real(8), intent (in) :: x
        real(4), intent (in) :: y
        res = merge(dble(y), merge(x, min(x, dble(y)), y /= y), x /= x)
    end function
    real(8) function fmin48(x, y) result(res)
        real(4), intent (in) :: x
        real(8), intent (in) :: y
        res = merge(y, merge(dble(x), min(dble(x), y), y /= y), x /= x)
    end function
end module

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
use fmin_fmax_functions
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (z <= (-2.55d-53)) then
        tmp = z * y
    else if (z <= 2.7d-110) then
        tmp = x
    else if (z <= 15000000.0d0) then
        tmp = a * t
    else
        tmp = z * y
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if (z <= -2.55e-53) {
		tmp = z * y;
	} else if (z <= 2.7e-110) {
		tmp = x;
	} else if (z <= 15000000.0) {
		tmp = a * t;
	} else {
		tmp = z * y;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b):
	tmp = 0
	if z <= -2.55e-53:
		tmp = z * y
	elif z <= 2.7e-110:
		tmp = x
	elif z <= 15000000.0:
		tmp = a * t
	else:
		tmp = z * y
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (z <= -2.55e-53)
		tmp = Float64(z * y);
	elseif (z <= 2.7e-110)
		tmp = x;
	elseif (z <= 15000000.0)
		tmp = Float64(a * t);
	else
		tmp = Float64(z * y);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (z <= -2.55e-53)
		tmp = z * y;
	elseif (z <= 2.7e-110)
		tmp = x;
	elseif (z <= 15000000.0)
		tmp = a * t;
	else
		tmp = z * y;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := If[LessEqual[z, -2.55e-53], N[(z * y), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[z, 2.7e-110], x, If[LessEqual[z, 15000000.0], N[(a * t), $MachinePrecision], N[(z * y), $MachinePrecision]]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if z < -2.55000000000000022e-53 or 1.5e7 < z

   1. Initial program 87.6%

      \[\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \]

   2. Taylor expanded in y around inf

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot z} \]
   3. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto z \cdot \color{blue}{y} \]

      2. lower-*.f64 38.7

         \[\leadsto z \cdot \color{blue}{y} \]

   4. Applied rewrites 38.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot y} \]

   if -2.55000000000000022e-53 < z < 2.6999999999999998e-110

   1. Initial program 98.6%

      \[\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \]

   2. Taylor expanded in x around inf

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} \]
   3. Step-by-step derivation

   4. Applied rewrites 40.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} \]

   if 2.6999999999999998e-110 < z < 1.5e7

   1. Initial program 98.3%

      \[\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \]

   2. Taylor expanded in t around inf

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot t} \]
   3. Step-by-step derivation

      1. lower-*.f64 32.0

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \color{blue}{t} \]

   4. Applied rewrites 32.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot t} \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.
4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 9: 38.7% accurate, 1.8× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -27500:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \leq 2.35 \cdot 10^{+52}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot t\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= x -27500.0) x (if (<= x 2.35e+52) (* a t) x)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if (x <= -27500.0) {
		tmp = x;
	} else if (x <= 2.35e+52) {
		tmp = a * t;
	} else {
		tmp = x;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

module fmin_fmax_functions
    implicit none
    private
    public fmax
    public fmin

    interface fmax
        module procedure fmax88
        module procedure fmax44
        module procedure fmax84
        module procedure fmax48
    end interface
    interface fmin
        module procedure fmin88
        module procedure fmin44
        module procedure fmin84
        module procedure fmin48
    end interface
contains
    real(8) function fmax88(x, y) result (res)
        real(8), intent (in) :: x
        real(8), intent (in) :: y
        res = merge(y, merge(x, max(x, y), y /= y), x /= x)
    end function
    real(4) function fmax44(x, y) result (res)
        real(4), intent (in) :: x
        real(4), intent (in) :: y
        res = merge(y, merge(x, max(x, y), y /= y), x /= x)
    end function
    real(8) function fmax84(x, y) result(res)
        real(8), intent (in) :: x
        real(4), intent (in) :: y
        res = merge(dble(y), merge(x, max(x, dble(y)), y /= y), x /= x)
    end function
    real(8) function fmax48(x, y) result(res)
        real(4), intent (in) :: x
        real(8), intent (in) :: y
        res = merge(y, merge(dble(x), max(dble(x), y), y /= y), x /= x)
    end function
    real(8) function fmin88(x, y) result (res)
        real(8), intent (in) :: x
        real(8), intent (in) :: y
        res = merge(y, merge(x, min(x, y), y /= y), x /= x)
    end function
    real(4) function fmin44(x, y) result (res)
        real(4), intent (in) :: x
        real(4), intent (in) :: y
        res = merge(y, merge(x, min(x, y), y /= y), x /= x)
    end function
    real(8) function fmin84(x, y) result(res)
        real(8), intent (in) :: x
        real(4), intent (in) :: y
        res = merge(dble(y), merge(x, min(x, dble(y)), y /= y), x /= x)
    end function
    real(8) function fmin48(x, y) result(res)
        real(4), intent (in) :: x
        real(8), intent (in) :: y
        res = merge(y, merge(dble(x), min(dble(x), y), y /= y), x /= x)
    end function
end module

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
use fmin_fmax_functions
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (x <= (-27500.0d0)) then
        tmp = x
    else if (x <= 2.35d+52) then
        tmp = a * t
    else
        tmp = x
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if (x <= -27500.0) {
		tmp = x;
	} else if (x <= 2.35e+52) {
		tmp = a * t;
	} else {
		tmp = x;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b):
	tmp = 0
	if x <= -27500.0:
		tmp = x
	elif x <= 2.35e+52:
		tmp = a * t
	else:
		tmp = x
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (x <= -27500.0)
		tmp = x;
	elseif (x <= 2.35e+52)
		tmp = Float64(a * t);
	else
		tmp = x;
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (x <= -27500.0)
		tmp = x;
	elseif (x <= 2.35e+52)
		tmp = a * t;
	else
		tmp = x;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := If[LessEqual[x, -27500.0], x, If[LessEqual[x, 2.35e+52], N[(a * t), $MachinePrecision], x]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if x < -27500 or 2.35e52 < x

   1. Initial program 93.4%

      \[\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \]

   2. Taylor expanded in x around inf

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} \]
   3. Step-by-step derivation

   4. Applied rewrites 46.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} \]

   if -27500 < x < 2.35e52

   1. Initial program 92.1%

      \[\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \]

   2. Taylor expanded in t around inf

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot t} \]
   3. Step-by-step derivation

      1. lower-*.f64 35.0

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \color{blue}{t} \]

   4. Applied rewrites 35.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot t} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 10: 26.5% accurate, 21.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b) :precision binary64 x)

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	return x;
}

Fortran

module fmin_fmax_functions
    implicit none
    private
    public fmax
    public fmin

    interface fmax
        module procedure fmax88
        module procedure fmax44
        module procedure fmax84
        module procedure fmax48
    end interface
    interface fmin
        module procedure fmin88
        module procedure fmin44
        module procedure fmin84
        module procedure fmin48
    end interface
contains
    real(8) function fmax88(x, y) result (res)
        real(8), intent (in) :: x
        real(8), intent (in) :: y
        res = merge(y, merge(x, max(x, y), y /= y), x /= x)
    end function
    real(4) function fmax44(x, y) result (res)
        real(4), intent (in) :: x
        real(4), intent (in) :: y
        res = merge(y, merge(x, max(x, y), y /= y), x /= x)
    end function
    real(8) function fmax84(x, y) result(res)
        real(8), intent (in) :: x
        real(4), intent (in) :: y
        res = merge(dble(y), merge(x, max(x, dble(y)), y /= y), x /= x)
    end function
    real(8) function fmax48(x, y) result(res)
        real(4), intent (in) :: x
        real(8), intent (in) :: y
        res = merge(y, merge(dble(x), max(dble(x), y), y /= y), x /= x)
    end function
    real(8) function fmin88(x, y) result (res)
        real(8), intent (in) :: x
        real(8), intent (in) :: y
        res = merge(y, merge(x, min(x, y), y /= y), x /= x)
    end function
    real(4) function fmin44(x, y) result (res)
        real(4), intent (in) :: x
        real(4), intent (in) :: y
        res = merge(y, merge(x, min(x, y), y /= y), x /= x)
    end function
    real(8) function fmin84(x, y) result(res)
        real(8), intent (in) :: x
        real(4), intent (in) :: y
        res = merge(dble(y), merge(x, min(x, dble(y)), y /= y), x /= x)
    end function
    real(8) function fmin48(x, y) result(res)
        real(4), intent (in) :: x
        real(8), intent (in) :: y
        res = merge(y, merge(dble(x), min(dble(x), y), y /= y), x /= x)
    end function
end module

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
use fmin_fmax_functions
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    code = x
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	return x;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b):
	return x

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	return x
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = x;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := x

Derivation

1. Initial program 92.7%

   \[\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \]

2. Taylor expanded in x around inf

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} \]
3. Step-by-step derivation

4. Applied rewrites 26.5%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2025119 
(FPCore (x y z t a b)
  :name "Graphics.Rasterific.CubicBezier:cachedBezierAt from Rasterific-0.6.1"
  :precision binary64
  (+ (+ (+ x (* y z)) (* t a)) (* (* a z) b)))