Graphics.Rasterific.CubicBezier:cachedBezierAt from Rasterific-0.6.1

Percentage Accurate: 92.2% → 96.3%

Time: 3.7s

Alternatives: 13

Speedup: 1.1×

• 32.5% of points produce a very large (infinite) output. You may want to add a precondition.

Specification

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b)
 :precision binary64
 (+ (+ (+ x (* y z)) (* t a)) (* (* a z) b)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	return ((x + (y * z)) + (t * a)) + ((a * z) * b);
}

Fortran

module fmin_fmax_functions
    implicit none
    private
    public fmax
    public fmin

    interface fmax
        module procedure fmax88
        module procedure fmax44
        module procedure fmax84
        module procedure fmax48
    end interface
    interface fmin
        module procedure fmin88
        module procedure fmin44
        module procedure fmin84
        module procedure fmin48
    end interface
contains
    real(8) function fmax88(x, y) result (res)
        real(8), intent (in) :: x
        real(8), intent (in) :: y
        res = merge(y, merge(x, max(x, y), y /= y), x /= x)
    end function
    real(4) function fmax44(x, y) result (res)
        real(4), intent (in) :: x
        real(4), intent (in) :: y
        res = merge(y, merge(x, max(x, y), y /= y), x /= x)
    end function
    real(8) function fmax84(x, y) result(res)
        real(8), intent (in) :: x
        real(4), intent (in) :: y
        res = merge(dble(y), merge(x, max(x, dble(y)), y /= y), x /= x)
    end function
    real(8) function fmax48(x, y) result(res)
        real(4), intent (in) :: x
        real(8), intent (in) :: y
        res = merge(y, merge(dble(x), max(dble(x), y), y /= y), x /= x)
    end function
    real(8) function fmin88(x, y) result (res)
        real(8), intent (in) :: x
        real(8), intent (in) :: y
        res = merge(y, merge(x, min(x, y), y /= y), x /= x)
    end function
    real(4) function fmin44(x, y) result (res)
        real(4), intent (in) :: x
        real(4), intent (in) :: y
        res = merge(y, merge(x, min(x, y), y /= y), x /= x)
    end function
    real(8) function fmin84(x, y) result(res)
        real(8), intent (in) :: x
        real(4), intent (in) :: y
        res = merge(dble(y), merge(x, min(x, dble(y)), y /= y), x /= x)
    end function
    real(8) function fmin48(x, y) result(res)
        real(4), intent (in) :: x
        real(8), intent (in) :: y
        res = merge(y, merge(dble(x), min(dble(x), y), y /= y), x /= x)
    end function
end module

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
use fmin_fmax_functions
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    code = ((x + (y * z)) + (t * a)) + ((a * z) * b)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	return ((x + (y * z)) + (t * a)) + ((a * z) * b);
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b):
	return ((x + (y * z)) + (t * a)) + ((a * z) * b)

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(x + Float64(y * z)) + Float64(t * a)) + Float64(Float64(a * z) * b))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = ((x + (y * z)) + (t * a)) + ((a * z) * b);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := N[(N[(N[(x + N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(t * a), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(a * z), $MachinePrecision] * b), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Initial Program: 92.2% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b)
 :precision binary64
 (+ (+ (+ x (* y z)) (* t a)) (* (* a z) b)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	return ((x + (y * z)) + (t * a)) + ((a * z) * b);
}

Fortran

module fmin_fmax_functions
    implicit none
    private
    public fmax
    public fmin

    interface fmax
        module procedure fmax88
        module procedure fmax44
        module procedure fmax84
        module procedure fmax48
    end interface
    interface fmin
        module procedure fmin88
        module procedure fmin44
        module procedure fmin84
        module procedure fmin48
    end interface
contains
    real(8) function fmax88(x, y) result (res)
        real(8), intent (in) :: x
        real(8), intent (in) :: y
        res = merge(y, merge(x, max(x, y), y /= y), x /= x)
    end function
    real(4) function fmax44(x, y) result (res)
        real(4), intent (in) :: x
        real(4), intent (in) :: y
        res = merge(y, merge(x, max(x, y), y /= y), x /= x)
    end function
    real(8) function fmax84(x, y) result(res)
        real(8), intent (in) :: x
        real(4), intent (in) :: y
        res = merge(dble(y), merge(x, max(x, dble(y)), y /= y), x /= x)
    end function
    real(8) function fmax48(x, y) result(res)
        real(4), intent (in) :: x
        real(8), intent (in) :: y
        res = merge(y, merge(dble(x), max(dble(x), y), y /= y), x /= x)
    end function
    real(8) function fmin88(x, y) result (res)
        real(8), intent (in) :: x
        real(8), intent (in) :: y
        res = merge(y, merge(x, min(x, y), y /= y), x /= x)
    end function
    real(4) function fmin44(x, y) result (res)
        real(4), intent (in) :: x
        real(4), intent (in) :: y
        res = merge(y, merge(x, min(x, y), y /= y), x /= x)
    end function
    real(8) function fmin84(x, y) result(res)
        real(8), intent (in) :: x
        real(4), intent (in) :: y
        res = merge(dble(y), merge(x, min(x, dble(y)), y /= y), x /= x)
    end function
    real(8) function fmin48(x, y) result(res)
        real(4), intent (in) :: x
        real(8), intent (in) :: y
        res = merge(y, merge(dble(x), min(dble(x), y), y /= y), x /= x)
    end function
end module

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
use fmin_fmax_functions
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    code = ((x + (y * z)) + (t * a)) + ((a * z) * b)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	return ((x + (y * z)) + (t * a)) + ((a * z) * b);
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b):
	return ((x + (y * z)) + (t * a)) + ((a * z) * b)

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(x + Float64(y * z)) + Float64(t * a)) + Float64(Float64(a * z) * b))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = ((x + (y * z)) + (t * a)) + ((a * z) * b);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := N[(N[(N[(x + N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(t * a), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(a * z), $MachinePrecision] * b), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Alternative 1: 96.3% accurate, 0.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_1 := \left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b\\ \mathbf{if}\;t\_1 \leq \infty:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_1\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(b, z, t\right) \cdot a\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_1 (+ (+ (+ x (* y z)) (* t a)) (* (* a z) b))))
   (if (<= t_1 INFINITY) t_1 (* (fma b z t) a))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double t_1 = ((x + (y * z)) + (t * a)) + ((a * z) * b);
	double tmp;
	if (t_1 <= ((double) INFINITY)) {
		tmp = t_1;
	} else {
		tmp = fma(b, z, t) * a;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	t_1 = Float64(Float64(Float64(x + Float64(y * z)) + Float64(t * a)) + Float64(Float64(a * z) * b))
	tmp = 0.0
	if (t_1 <= Inf)
		tmp = t_1;
	else
		tmp = Float64(fma(b, z, t) * a);
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := Block[{t$95$1 = N[(N[(N[(x + N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(t * a), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(a * z), $MachinePrecision] * b), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[t$95$1, Infinity], t$95$1, N[(N[(b * z + t), $MachinePrecision] * a), $MachinePrecision]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (+.f64 (+.f64 (+.f64 x (*.f64 y z)) (*.f64 t a)) (*.f64 (*.f64 a z) b)) < +inf.0

   1. Initial program 97.6%

      \[\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \]

   if +inf.0 < (+.f64 (+.f64 (+.f64 x (*.f64 y z)) (*.f64 t a)) (*.f64 (*.f64 a z) b))

   1. Initial program 0.0%

      \[\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \]

   2. Taylor expanded in a around inf

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(t + b \cdot z\right)} \]
   3. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \left(t + b \cdot z\right) \cdot \color{blue}{a} \]

      2. lower-*.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \left(t + b \cdot z\right) \cdot \color{blue}{a} \]

      3. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \left(b \cdot z + t\right) \cdot a \]

      4. lower-fma.f64 74.5

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(b, z, t\right) \cdot a \]

   4. Applied rewrites 74.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, z, t\right) \cdot a} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 2: 86.7% accurate, 1.1× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_1 := \mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, y\right), z, x\right)\\ \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -3.1 \cdot 10^{+83}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_1\\ \mathbf{elif}\;z \leq 5600000000000:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \mathsf{fma}\left(b, z, t\right) \cdot a\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_1\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_1 (fma (fma b a y) z x)))
   (if (<= z -3.1e+83)
     t_1
     (if (<= z 5600000000000.0) (+ x (* (fma b z t) a)) t_1))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double t_1 = fma(fma(b, a, y), z, x);
	double tmp;
	if (z <= -3.1e+83) {
		tmp = t_1;
	} else if (z <= 5600000000000.0) {
		tmp = x + (fma(b, z, t) * a);
	} else {
		tmp = t_1;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	t_1 = fma(fma(b, a, y), z, x)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (z <= -3.1e+83)
		tmp = t_1;
	elseif (z <= 5600000000000.0)
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(fma(b, z, t) * a));
	else
		tmp = t_1;
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := Block[{t$95$1 = N[(N[(b * a + y), $MachinePrecision] * z + x), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[z, -3.1e+83], t$95$1, If[LessEqual[z, 5600000000000.0], N[(x + N[(N[(b * z + t), $MachinePrecision] * a), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], t$95$1]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if z < -3.09999999999999992e83 or 5.6e12 < z

   1. Initial program 84.6%

      \[\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \]

   2. Taylor expanded in t around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \left(a \cdot \left(b \cdot z\right) + y \cdot z\right)} \]
   3. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \left(a \cdot \left(b \cdot z\right) + y \cdot z\right) + \color{blue}{x} \]

      2. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \left(y \cdot z + a \cdot \left(b \cdot z\right)\right) + x \]

      3. associate-*r* N/A

         \[\leadsto \left(y \cdot z + \left(a \cdot b\right) \cdot z\right) + x \]

      4. distribute-rgt-in N/A

         \[\leadsto z \cdot \left(y + a \cdot b\right) + x \]

      5. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \left(y + a \cdot b\right) \cdot z + x \]

      6. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y + a \cdot b, \color{blue}{z}, x\right) \]

      7. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(a \cdot b + y, z, x\right) \]

      8. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(b \cdot a + y, z, x\right) \]

      9. lower-fma.f64 89.1

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, y\right), z, x\right) \]

   4. Applied rewrites 89.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, y\right), z, x\right)} \]

   if -3.09999999999999992e83 < z < 5.6e12

   1. Initial program 97.9%

      \[\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. lift-+.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b} \]

      2. lift-+.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right)} + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \]

      3. lift-+.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{\left(x + y \cdot z\right)} + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \]

      4. lift-*.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \left(\left(x + \color{blue}{y \cdot z}\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \]

      5. lift-*.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \color{blue}{\left(a \cdot z\right)} \cdot b \]

      6. lift-*.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \color{blue}{\left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b} \]

      7. associate-+l+ N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b\right)} \]

      8. lift-*.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(\color{blue}{t \cdot a} + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b\right) \]

      9. associate-*l* N/A

         \[\leadsto \left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(z \cdot b\right)}\right) \]

      10. *-commutative N/A

          \[\leadsto \left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + a \cdot \color{blue}{\left(b \cdot z\right)}\right) \]

      11. *-commutative N/A

          \[\leadsto \left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + \color{blue}{\left(b \cdot z\right) \cdot a}\right) \]

      12. distribute-rgt-in N/A

          \[\leadsto \left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(t + b \cdot z\right)} \]

      13. lower-+.f64 N/A

          \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + a \cdot \left(t + b \cdot z\right)} \]

      14. +-commutative N/A

          \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z + x\right)} + a \cdot \left(t + b \cdot z\right) \]

      15. *-commutative N/A

          \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{z \cdot y} + x\right) + a \cdot \left(t + b \cdot z\right) \]

      16. lower-fma.f64 N/A

          \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, y, x\right)} + a \cdot \left(t + b \cdot z\right) \]

      17. *-commutative N/A

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z, y, x\right) + \color{blue}{\left(t + b \cdot z\right) \cdot a} \]

      18. lower-*.f64 N/A

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z, y, x\right) + \color{blue}{\left(t + b \cdot z\right) \cdot a} \]

      19. +-commutative N/A

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z, y, x\right) + \color{blue}{\left(b \cdot z + t\right)} \cdot a \]

      20. lower-fma.f64 99.3

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z, y, x\right) + \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, z, t\right)} \cdot a \]

   3. Applied rewrites 99.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, y, x\right) + \mathsf{fma}\left(b, z, t\right) \cdot a} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in x around inf

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} + \mathsf{fma}\left(b, z, t\right) \cdot a \]
   5. Step-by-step derivation

   6. Applied rewrites 84.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} + \mathsf{fma}\left(b, z, t\right) \cdot a \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 3: 94.9% accurate, 1.1× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -1.8 \cdot 10^{+104}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, y\right), z, x\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(z, y, x\right) + \mathsf{fma}\left(b, z, t\right) \cdot a\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= z -1.8e+104) (fma (fma b a y) z x) (+ (fma z y x) (* (fma b z t) a))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if (z <= -1.8e+104) {
		tmp = fma(fma(b, a, y), z, x);
	} else {
		tmp = fma(z, y, x) + (fma(b, z, t) * a);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (z <= -1.8e+104)
		tmp = fma(fma(b, a, y), z, x);
	else
		tmp = Float64(fma(z, y, x) + Float64(fma(b, z, t) * a));
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := If[LessEqual[z, -1.8e+104], N[(N[(b * a + y), $MachinePrecision] * z + x), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[(z * y + x), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(b * z + t), $MachinePrecision] * a), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if z < -1.8e104

   1. Initial program 83.4%

      \[\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \]

   2. Taylor expanded in t around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \left(a \cdot \left(b \cdot z\right) + y \cdot z\right)} \]
   3. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \left(a \cdot \left(b \cdot z\right) + y \cdot z\right) + \color{blue}{x} \]

      2. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \left(y \cdot z + a \cdot \left(b \cdot z\right)\right) + x \]

      3. associate-*r* N/A

         \[\leadsto \left(y \cdot z + \left(a \cdot b\right) \cdot z\right) + x \]

      4. distribute-rgt-in N/A

         \[\leadsto z \cdot \left(y + a \cdot b\right) + x \]

      5. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \left(y + a \cdot b\right) \cdot z + x \]

      6. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y + a \cdot b, \color{blue}{z}, x\right) \]

      7. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(a \cdot b + y, z, x\right) \]

      8. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(b \cdot a + y, z, x\right) \]

      9. lower-fma.f64 91.1

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, y\right), z, x\right) \]

   4. Applied rewrites 91.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, y\right), z, x\right)} \]

   if -1.8e104 < z

   1. Initial program 94.0%

      \[\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. lift-+.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b} \]

      2. lift-+.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right)} + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \]

      3. lift-+.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{\left(x + y \cdot z\right)} + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \]

      4. lift-*.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \left(\left(x + \color{blue}{y \cdot z}\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \]

      5. lift-*.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \color{blue}{\left(a \cdot z\right)} \cdot b \]

      6. lift-*.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \color{blue}{\left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b} \]

      7. associate-+l+ N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b\right)} \]

      8. lift-*.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(\color{blue}{t \cdot a} + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b\right) \]

      9. associate-*l* N/A

         \[\leadsto \left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(z \cdot b\right)}\right) \]

      10. *-commutative N/A

          \[\leadsto \left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + a \cdot \color{blue}{\left(b \cdot z\right)}\right) \]

      11. *-commutative N/A

          \[\leadsto \left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + \color{blue}{\left(b \cdot z\right) \cdot a}\right) \]

      12. distribute-rgt-in N/A

          \[\leadsto \left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(t + b \cdot z\right)} \]

      13. lower-+.f64 N/A

          \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + a \cdot \left(t + b \cdot z\right)} \]

      14. +-commutative N/A

          \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z + x\right)} + a \cdot \left(t + b \cdot z\right) \]

      15. *-commutative N/A

          \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{z \cdot y} + x\right) + a \cdot \left(t + b \cdot z\right) \]

      16. lower-fma.f64 N/A

          \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, y, x\right)} + a \cdot \left(t + b \cdot z\right) \]

      17. *-commutative N/A

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z, y, x\right) + \color{blue}{\left(t + b \cdot z\right) \cdot a} \]

      18. lower-*.f64 N/A

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z, y, x\right) + \color{blue}{\left(t + b \cdot z\right) \cdot a} \]

      19. +-commutative N/A

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z, y, x\right) + \color{blue}{\left(b \cdot z + t\right)} \cdot a \]

      20. lower-fma.f64 95.8

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z, y, x\right) + \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, z, t\right)} \cdot a \]

   3. Applied rewrites 95.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, y, x\right) + \mathsf{fma}\left(b, z, t\right) \cdot a} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 4: 86.7% accurate, 1.2× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_1 := \mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, y\right), z, x\right)\\ \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -3.1 \cdot 10^{+83}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_1\\ \mathbf{elif}\;z \leq 5600000000000:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(b, z, t\right), a, x\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_1\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_1 (fma (fma b a y) z x)))
   (if (<= z -3.1e+83)
     t_1
     (if (<= z 5600000000000.0) (fma (fma b z t) a x) t_1))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double t_1 = fma(fma(b, a, y), z, x);
	double tmp;
	if (z <= -3.1e+83) {
		tmp = t_1;
	} else if (z <= 5600000000000.0) {
		tmp = fma(fma(b, z, t), a, x);
	} else {
		tmp = t_1;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	t_1 = fma(fma(b, a, y), z, x)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (z <= -3.1e+83)
		tmp = t_1;
	elseif (z <= 5600000000000.0)
		tmp = fma(fma(b, z, t), a, x);
	else
		tmp = t_1;
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := Block[{t$95$1 = N[(N[(b * a + y), $MachinePrecision] * z + x), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[z, -3.1e+83], t$95$1, If[LessEqual[z, 5600000000000.0], N[(N[(b * z + t), $MachinePrecision] * a + x), $MachinePrecision], t$95$1]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if z < -3.09999999999999992e83 or 5.6e12 < z

   1. Initial program 84.6%

      \[\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \]

   2. Taylor expanded in t around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \left(a \cdot \left(b \cdot z\right) + y \cdot z\right)} \]
   3. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \left(a \cdot \left(b \cdot z\right) + y \cdot z\right) + \color{blue}{x} \]

      2. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \left(y \cdot z + a \cdot \left(b \cdot z\right)\right) + x \]

      3. associate-*r* N/A

         \[\leadsto \left(y \cdot z + \left(a \cdot b\right) \cdot z\right) + x \]

      4. distribute-rgt-in N/A

         \[\leadsto z \cdot \left(y + a \cdot b\right) + x \]

      5. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \left(y + a \cdot b\right) \cdot z + x \]

      6. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y + a \cdot b, \color{blue}{z}, x\right) \]

      7. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(a \cdot b + y, z, x\right) \]

      8. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(b \cdot a + y, z, x\right) \]

      9. lower-fma.f64 89.1

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, y\right), z, x\right) \]

   4. Applied rewrites 89.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, y\right), z, x\right)} \]

   if -3.09999999999999992e83 < z < 5.6e12

   1. Initial program 97.9%

      \[\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \]

   2. Taylor expanded in y around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \left(a \cdot t + a \cdot \left(b \cdot z\right)\right)} \]
   3. Step-by-step derivation

      1. distribute-lft-in N/A

         \[\leadsto x + a \cdot \color{blue}{\left(t + b \cdot z\right)} \]

      2. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \left(t + b \cdot z\right) + \color{blue}{x} \]

      3. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \left(t + b \cdot z\right) \cdot a + x \]

      4. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(t + b \cdot z, \color{blue}{a}, x\right) \]

      5. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(b \cdot z + t, a, x\right) \]

      6. lower-fma.f64 84.8

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(b, z, t\right), a, x\right) \]

   4. Applied rewrites 84.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(b, z, t\right), a, x\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 5: 87.2% accurate, 1.2× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_1 := \mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, y\right), z, x\right)\\ \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -1.25 \cdot 10^{+24}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_1\\ \mathbf{elif}\;z \leq 5.6 \cdot 10^{+42}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(a, t, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, y, x\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_1\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_1 (fma (fma b a y) z x)))
   (if (<= z -1.25e+24) t_1 (if (<= z 5.6e+42) (fma a t (fma z y x)) t_1))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double t_1 = fma(fma(b, a, y), z, x);
	double tmp;
	if (z <= -1.25e+24) {
		tmp = t_1;
	} else if (z <= 5.6e+42) {
		tmp = fma(a, t, fma(z, y, x));
	} else {
		tmp = t_1;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	t_1 = fma(fma(b, a, y), z, x)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (z <= -1.25e+24)
		tmp = t_1;
	elseif (z <= 5.6e+42)
		tmp = fma(a, t, fma(z, y, x));
	else
		tmp = t_1;
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := Block[{t$95$1 = N[(N[(b * a + y), $MachinePrecision] * z + x), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[z, -1.25e+24], t$95$1, If[LessEqual[z, 5.6e+42], N[(a * t + N[(z * y + x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], t$95$1]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if z < -1.25000000000000011e24 or 5.5999999999999999e42 < z

   1. Initial program 84.6%

      \[\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \]

   2. Taylor expanded in t around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \left(a \cdot \left(b \cdot z\right) + y \cdot z\right)} \]
   3. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \left(a \cdot \left(b \cdot z\right) + y \cdot z\right) + \color{blue}{x} \]

      2. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \left(y \cdot z + a \cdot \left(b \cdot z\right)\right) + x \]

      3. associate-*r* N/A

         \[\leadsto \left(y \cdot z + \left(a \cdot b\right) \cdot z\right) + x \]

      4. distribute-rgt-in N/A

         \[\leadsto z \cdot \left(y + a \cdot b\right) + x \]

      5. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \left(y + a \cdot b\right) \cdot z + x \]

      6. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y + a \cdot b, \color{blue}{z}, x\right) \]

      7. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(a \cdot b + y, z, x\right) \]

      8. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(b \cdot a + y, z, x\right) \]

      9. lower-fma.f64 88.7

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, y\right), z, x\right) \]

   4. Applied rewrites 88.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, y\right), z, x\right)} \]

   if -1.25000000000000011e24 < z < 5.5999999999999999e42

   1. Initial program 98.5%

      \[\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \]

   2. Taylor expanded in b around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \left(a \cdot t + y \cdot z\right)} \]
   3. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto x + \left(y \cdot z + \color{blue}{a \cdot t}\right) \]

      2. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto x + \left(y \cdot z + t \cdot \color{blue}{a}\right) \]

      3. lift-*.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto x + \left(y \cdot z + t \cdot \color{blue}{a}\right) \]

      4. associate-+l+ N/A

         \[\leadsto \left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \color{blue}{t \cdot a} \]

      5. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto t \cdot a + \color{blue}{\left(x + y \cdot z\right)} \]

      6. lift-*.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto t \cdot a + \left(\color{blue}{x} + y \cdot z\right) \]

      7. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto a \cdot t + \left(\color{blue}{x} + y \cdot z\right) \]

      8. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(a, \color{blue}{t}, x + y \cdot z\right) \]

      9. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(a, t, y \cdot z + x\right) \]

      10. *-commutative N/A

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(a, t, z \cdot y + x\right) \]

      11. lower-fma.f64 86.0

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(a, t, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, y, x\right)\right) \]

   4. Applied rewrites 86.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(a, t, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, y, x\right)\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 6: 80.7% accurate, 1.2× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_1 := \mathsf{fma}\left(b, z, t\right) \cdot a\\ \mathbf{if}\;b \leq -5.4 \cdot 10^{+190}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_1\\ \mathbf{elif}\;b \leq 1.35 \cdot 10^{+198}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(a, t, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, y, x\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_1\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_1 (* (fma b z t) a)))
   (if (<= b -5.4e+190) t_1 (if (<= b 1.35e+198) (fma a t (fma z y x)) t_1))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double t_1 = fma(b, z, t) * a;
	double tmp;
	if (b <= -5.4e+190) {
		tmp = t_1;
	} else if (b <= 1.35e+198) {
		tmp = fma(a, t, fma(z, y, x));
	} else {
		tmp = t_1;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	t_1 = Float64(fma(b, z, t) * a)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (b <= -5.4e+190)
		tmp = t_1;
	elseif (b <= 1.35e+198)
		tmp = fma(a, t, fma(z, y, x));
	else
		tmp = t_1;
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := Block[{t$95$1 = N[(N[(b * z + t), $MachinePrecision] * a), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[b, -5.4e+190], t$95$1, If[LessEqual[b, 1.35e+198], N[(a * t + N[(z * y + x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], t$95$1]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if b < -5.40000000000000008e190 or 1.35e198 < b

   1. Initial program 90.4%

      \[\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \]

   2. Taylor expanded in a around inf

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(t + b \cdot z\right)} \]
   3. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \left(t + b \cdot z\right) \cdot \color{blue}{a} \]

      2. lower-*.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \left(t + b \cdot z\right) \cdot \color{blue}{a} \]

      3. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \left(b \cdot z + t\right) \cdot a \]

      4. lower-fma.f64 67.5

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(b, z, t\right) \cdot a \]

   4. Applied rewrites 67.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, z, t\right) \cdot a} \]

   if -5.40000000000000008e190 < b < 1.35e198

   1. Initial program 92.6%

      \[\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \]

   2. Taylor expanded in b around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \left(a \cdot t + y \cdot z\right)} \]
   3. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto x + \left(y \cdot z + \color{blue}{a \cdot t}\right) \]

      2. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto x + \left(y \cdot z + t \cdot \color{blue}{a}\right) \]

      3. lift-*.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto x + \left(y \cdot z + t \cdot \color{blue}{a}\right) \]

      4. associate-+l+ N/A

         \[\leadsto \left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \color{blue}{t \cdot a} \]

      5. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto t \cdot a + \color{blue}{\left(x + y \cdot z\right)} \]

      6. lift-*.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto t \cdot a + \left(\color{blue}{x} + y \cdot z\right) \]

      7. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto a \cdot t + \left(\color{blue}{x} + y \cdot z\right) \]

      8. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(a, \color{blue}{t}, x + y \cdot z\right) \]

      9. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(a, t, y \cdot z + x\right) \]

      10. *-commutative N/A

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(a, t, z \cdot y + x\right) \]

      11. lower-fma.f64 83.7

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(a, t, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, y, x\right)\right) \]

   4. Applied rewrites 83.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(a, t, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, y, x\right)\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 7: 74.6% accurate, 1.2× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_1 := \mathsf{fma}\left(b, z, t\right) \cdot a\\ \mathbf{if}\;a \leq -1.05 \cdot 10^{-26}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_1\\ \mathbf{elif}\;a \leq 6.2 \cdot 10^{-32}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(z, y, x\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_1\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_1 (* (fma b z t) a)))
   (if (<= a -1.05e-26) t_1 (if (<= a 6.2e-32) (fma z y x) t_1))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double t_1 = fma(b, z, t) * a;
	double tmp;
	if (a <= -1.05e-26) {
		tmp = t_1;
	} else if (a <= 6.2e-32) {
		tmp = fma(z, y, x);
	} else {
		tmp = t_1;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	t_1 = Float64(fma(b, z, t) * a)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (a <= -1.05e-26)
		tmp = t_1;
	elseif (a <= 6.2e-32)
		tmp = fma(z, y, x);
	else
		tmp = t_1;
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := Block[{t$95$1 = N[(N[(b * z + t), $MachinePrecision] * a), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[a, -1.05e-26], t$95$1, If[LessEqual[a, 6.2e-32], N[(z * y + x), $MachinePrecision], t$95$1]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if a < -1.05000000000000004e-26 or 6.20000000000000021e-32 < a

   1. Initial program 86.7%

      \[\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \]

   2. Taylor expanded in a around inf

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(t + b \cdot z\right)} \]
   3. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \left(t + b \cdot z\right) \cdot \color{blue}{a} \]

      2. lower-*.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \left(t + b \cdot z\right) \cdot \color{blue}{a} \]

      3. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \left(b \cdot z + t\right) \cdot a \]

      4. lower-fma.f64 73.2

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(b, z, t\right) \cdot a \]

   4. Applied rewrites 73.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, z, t\right) \cdot a} \]

   if -1.05000000000000004e-26 < a < 6.20000000000000021e-32

   1. Initial program 98.8%

      \[\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \]

   2. Taylor expanded in a around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + y \cdot z} \]
   3. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto y \cdot z + \color{blue}{x} \]

      2. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto z \cdot y + x \]

      3. lower-fma.f64 76.4

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z, \color{blue}{y}, x\right) \]

   4. Applied rewrites 76.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, y, x\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 8: 74.8% accurate, 1.2× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_1 := \mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, y\right) \cdot z\\ \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -2.8 \cdot 10^{-13}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_1\\ \mathbf{elif}\;z \leq 1.06 \cdot 10^{+17}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(a, t, x\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_1\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_1 (* (fma b a y) z)))
   (if (<= z -2.8e-13) t_1 (if (<= z 1.06e+17) (fma a t x) t_1))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double t_1 = fma(b, a, y) * z;
	double tmp;
	if (z <= -2.8e-13) {
		tmp = t_1;
	} else if (z <= 1.06e+17) {
		tmp = fma(a, t, x);
	} else {
		tmp = t_1;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	t_1 = Float64(fma(b, a, y) * z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (z <= -2.8e-13)
		tmp = t_1;
	elseif (z <= 1.06e+17)
		tmp = fma(a, t, x);
	else
		tmp = t_1;
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := Block[{t$95$1 = N[(N[(b * a + y), $MachinePrecision] * z), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[z, -2.8e-13], t$95$1, If[LessEqual[z, 1.06e+17], N[(a * t + x), $MachinePrecision], t$95$1]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if z < -2.8000000000000002e-13 or 1.06e17 < z

   1. Initial program 85.9%

      \[\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \]

   2. Taylor expanded in z around inf

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(y + a \cdot b\right)} \]
   3. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \left(y + a \cdot b\right) \cdot \color{blue}{z} \]

      2. lower-*.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \left(y + a \cdot b\right) \cdot \color{blue}{z} \]

      3. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \left(a \cdot b + y\right) \cdot z \]

      4. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \left(b \cdot a + y\right) \cdot z \]

      5. lower-fma.f64 75.0

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, y\right) \cdot z \]

   4. Applied rewrites 75.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, y\right) \cdot z} \]

   if -2.8000000000000002e-13 < z < 1.06e17

   1. Initial program 98.6%

      \[\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \]

   2. Taylor expanded in z around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + a \cdot t} \]
   3. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto a \cdot t + \color{blue}{x} \]

      2. lower-fma.f64 74.7

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(a, \color{blue}{t}, x\right) \]

   4. Applied rewrites 74.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(a, t, x\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 9: 63.4% accurate, 1.6× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -3.1 \cdot 10^{+83}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(z, y, x\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;z \leq 6900000000000:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(a, t, x\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(z, y, x\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= z -3.1e+83)
   (fma z y x)
   (if (<= z 6900000000000.0) (fma a t x) (fma z y x))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if (z <= -3.1e+83) {
		tmp = fma(z, y, x);
	} else if (z <= 6900000000000.0) {
		tmp = fma(a, t, x);
	} else {
		tmp = fma(z, y, x);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (z <= -3.1e+83)
		tmp = fma(z, y, x);
	elseif (z <= 6900000000000.0)
		tmp = fma(a, t, x);
	else
		tmp = fma(z, y, x);
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := If[LessEqual[z, -3.1e+83], N[(z * y + x), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[z, 6900000000000.0], N[(a * t + x), $MachinePrecision], N[(z * y + x), $MachinePrecision]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if z < -3.09999999999999992e83 or 6.9e12 < z

   1. Initial program 84.5%

      \[\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \]

   2. Taylor expanded in a around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + y \cdot z} \]
   3. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto y \cdot z + \color{blue}{x} \]

      2. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto z \cdot y + x \]

      3. lower-fma.f64 53.8

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z, \color{blue}{y}, x\right) \]

   4. Applied rewrites 53.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, y, x\right)} \]

   if -3.09999999999999992e83 < z < 6.9e12

   1. Initial program 97.9%

      \[\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \]

   2. Taylor expanded in z around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + a \cdot t} \]
   3. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto a \cdot t + \color{blue}{x} \]

      2. lower-fma.f64 70.6

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(a, \color{blue}{t}, x\right) \]

   4. Applied rewrites 70.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(a, t, x\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 10: 58.8% accurate, 1.6× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -8.8 \cdot 10^{+108}:\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot y\\ \mathbf{elif}\;z \leq 4.5 \cdot 10^{+18}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(a, t, x\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot y\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= z -8.8e+108) (* z y) (if (<= z 4.5e+18) (fma a t x) (* z y))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if (z <= -8.8e+108) {
		tmp = z * y;
	} else if (z <= 4.5e+18) {
		tmp = fma(a, t, x);
	} else {
		tmp = z * y;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (z <= -8.8e+108)
		tmp = Float64(z * y);
	elseif (z <= 4.5e+18)
		tmp = fma(a, t, x);
	else
		tmp = Float64(z * y);
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := If[LessEqual[z, -8.8e+108], N[(z * y), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[z, 4.5e+18], N[(a * t + x), $MachinePrecision], N[(z * y), $MachinePrecision]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if z < -8.8000000000000005e108 or 4.5e18 < z

   1. Initial program 84.0%

      \[\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \]

   2. Taylor expanded in y around inf

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot z} \]
   3. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto z \cdot \color{blue}{y} \]

      2. lower-*.f64 43.1

         \[\leadsto z \cdot \color{blue}{y} \]

   4. Applied rewrites 43.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot y} \]

   if -8.8000000000000005e108 < z < 4.5e18

   1. Initial program 97.7%

      \[\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \]

   2. Taylor expanded in z around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + a \cdot t} \]
   3. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto a \cdot t + \color{blue}{x} \]

      2. lower-fma.f64 69.3

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(a, \color{blue}{t}, x\right) \]

   4. Applied rewrites 69.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(a, t, x\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 11: 39.0% accurate, 1.7× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -3.1 \cdot 10^{+83}:\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot y\\ \mathbf{elif}\;z \leq 10^{+16}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot t\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot y\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= z -3.1e+83) (* z y) (if (<= z 1e+16) (* a t) (* z y))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if (z <= -3.1e+83) {
		tmp = z * y;
	} else if (z <= 1e+16) {
		tmp = a * t;
	} else {
		tmp = z * y;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

module fmin_fmax_functions
    implicit none
    private
    public fmax
    public fmin

    interface fmax
        module procedure fmax88
        module procedure fmax44
        module procedure fmax84
        module procedure fmax48
    end interface
    interface fmin
        module procedure fmin88
        module procedure fmin44
        module procedure fmin84
        module procedure fmin48
    end interface
contains
    real(8) function fmax88(x, y) result (res)
        real(8), intent (in) :: x
        real(8), intent (in) :: y
        res = merge(y, merge(x, max(x, y), y /= y), x /= x)
    end function
    real(4) function fmax44(x, y) result (res)
        real(4), intent (in) :: x
        real(4), intent (in) :: y
        res = merge(y, merge(x, max(x, y), y /= y), x /= x)
    end function
    real(8) function fmax84(x, y) result(res)
        real(8), intent (in) :: x
        real(4), intent (in) :: y
        res = merge(dble(y), merge(x, max(x, dble(y)), y /= y), x /= x)
    end function
    real(8) function fmax48(x, y) result(res)
        real(4), intent (in) :: x
        real(8), intent (in) :: y
        res = merge(y, merge(dble(x), max(dble(x), y), y /= y), x /= x)
    end function
    real(8) function fmin88(x, y) result (res)
        real(8), intent (in) :: x
        real(8), intent (in) :: y
        res = merge(y, merge(x, min(x, y), y /= y), x /= x)
    end function
    real(4) function fmin44(x, y) result (res)
        real(4), intent (in) :: x
        real(4), intent (in) :: y
        res = merge(y, merge(x, min(x, y), y /= y), x /= x)
    end function
    real(8) function fmin84(x, y) result(res)
        real(8), intent (in) :: x
        real(4), intent (in) :: y
        res = merge(dble(y), merge(x, min(x, dble(y)), y /= y), x /= x)
    end function
    real(8) function fmin48(x, y) result(res)
        real(4), intent (in) :: x
        real(8), intent (in) :: y
        res = merge(y, merge(dble(x), min(dble(x), y), y /= y), x /= x)
    end function
end module

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
use fmin_fmax_functions
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (z <= (-3.1d+83)) then
        tmp = z * y
    else if (z <= 1d+16) then
        tmp = a * t
    else
        tmp = z * y
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if (z <= -3.1e+83) {
		tmp = z * y;
	} else if (z <= 1e+16) {
		tmp = a * t;
	} else {
		tmp = z * y;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b):
	tmp = 0
	if z <= -3.1e+83:
		tmp = z * y
	elif z <= 1e+16:
		tmp = a * t
	else:
		tmp = z * y
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (z <= -3.1e+83)
		tmp = Float64(z * y);
	elseif (z <= 1e+16)
		tmp = Float64(a * t);
	else
		tmp = Float64(z * y);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (z <= -3.1e+83)
		tmp = z * y;
	elseif (z <= 1e+16)
		tmp = a * t;
	else
		tmp = z * y;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := If[LessEqual[z, -3.1e+83], N[(z * y), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[z, 1e+16], N[(a * t), $MachinePrecision], N[(z * y), $MachinePrecision]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if z < -3.09999999999999992e83 or 1e16 < z

   1. Initial program 84.5%

      \[\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \]

   2. Taylor expanded in y around inf

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot z} \]
   3. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto z \cdot \color{blue}{y} \]

      2. lower-*.f64 42.6

         \[\leadsto z \cdot \color{blue}{y} \]

   4. Applied rewrites 42.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot y} \]

   if -3.09999999999999992e83 < z < 1e16

   1. Initial program 97.9%

      \[\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \]

   2. Taylor expanded in t around inf

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot t} \]
   3. Step-by-step derivation

      1. lower-*.f64 36.3

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \color{blue}{t} \]

   4. Applied rewrites 36.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot t} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 12: 39.6% accurate, 1.7× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;a \leq -4.6 \cdot 10^{-27}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot t\\ \mathbf{elif}\;a \leq 3.9 \cdot 10^{-31}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot t\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= a -4.6e-27) (* a t) (if (<= a 3.9e-31) x (* a t))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if (a <= -4.6e-27) {
		tmp = a * t;
	} else if (a <= 3.9e-31) {
		tmp = x;
	} else {
		tmp = a * t;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

module fmin_fmax_functions
    implicit none
    private
    public fmax
    public fmin

    interface fmax
        module procedure fmax88
        module procedure fmax44
        module procedure fmax84
        module procedure fmax48
    end interface
    interface fmin
        module procedure fmin88
        module procedure fmin44
        module procedure fmin84
        module procedure fmin48
    end interface
contains
    real(8) function fmax88(x, y) result (res)
        real(8), intent (in) :: x
        real(8), intent (in) :: y
        res = merge(y, merge(x, max(x, y), y /= y), x /= x)
    end function
    real(4) function fmax44(x, y) result (res)
        real(4), intent (in) :: x
        real(4), intent (in) :: y
        res = merge(y, merge(x, max(x, y), y /= y), x /= x)
    end function
    real(8) function fmax84(x, y) result(res)
        real(8), intent (in) :: x
        real(4), intent (in) :: y
        res = merge(dble(y), merge(x, max(x, dble(y)), y /= y), x /= x)
    end function
    real(8) function fmax48(x, y) result(res)
        real(4), intent (in) :: x
        real(8), intent (in) :: y
        res = merge(y, merge(dble(x), max(dble(x), y), y /= y), x /= x)
    end function
    real(8) function fmin88(x, y) result (res)
        real(8), intent (in) :: x
        real(8), intent (in) :: y
        res = merge(y, merge(x, min(x, y), y /= y), x /= x)
    end function
    real(4) function fmin44(x, y) result (res)
        real(4), intent (in) :: x
        real(4), intent (in) :: y
        res = merge(y, merge(x, min(x, y), y /= y), x /= x)
    end function
    real(8) function fmin84(x, y) result(res)
        real(8), intent (in) :: x
        real(4), intent (in) :: y
        res = merge(dble(y), merge(x, min(x, dble(y)), y /= y), x /= x)
    end function
    real(8) function fmin48(x, y) result(res)
        real(4), intent (in) :: x
        real(8), intent (in) :: y
        res = merge(y, merge(dble(x), min(dble(x), y), y /= y), x /= x)
    end function
end module

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
use fmin_fmax_functions
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (a <= (-4.6d-27)) then
        tmp = a * t
    else if (a <= 3.9d-31) then
        tmp = x
    else
        tmp = a * t
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if (a <= -4.6e-27) {
		tmp = a * t;
	} else if (a <= 3.9e-31) {
		tmp = x;
	} else {
		tmp = a * t;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b):
	tmp = 0
	if a <= -4.6e-27:
		tmp = a * t
	elif a <= 3.9e-31:
		tmp = x
	else:
		tmp = a * t
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (a <= -4.6e-27)
		tmp = Float64(a * t);
	elseif (a <= 3.9e-31)
		tmp = x;
	else
		tmp = Float64(a * t);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (a <= -4.6e-27)
		tmp = a * t;
	elseif (a <= 3.9e-31)
		tmp = x;
	else
		tmp = a * t;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := If[LessEqual[a, -4.6e-27], N[(a * t), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[a, 3.9e-31], x, N[(a * t), $MachinePrecision]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if a < -4.5999999999999999e-27 or 3.9000000000000001e-31 < a

   1. Initial program 86.7%

      \[\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \]

   2. Taylor expanded in t around inf

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot t} \]
   3. Step-by-step derivation

      1. lower-*.f64 39.7

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \color{blue}{t} \]

   4. Applied rewrites 39.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot t} \]

   if -4.5999999999999999e-27 < a < 3.9000000000000001e-31

   1. Initial program 98.8%

      \[\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \]

   2. Taylor expanded in x around inf

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} \]
   3. Step-by-step derivation

   4. Applied rewrites 39.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 13: 26.5% accurate, 30.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b) :precision binary64 x)

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	return x;
}

Fortran

module fmin_fmax_functions
    implicit none
    private
    public fmax
    public fmin

    interface fmax
        module procedure fmax88
        module procedure fmax44
        module procedure fmax84
        module procedure fmax48
    end interface
    interface fmin
        module procedure fmin88
        module procedure fmin44
        module procedure fmin84
        module procedure fmin48
    end interface
contains
    real(8) function fmax88(x, y) result (res)
        real(8), intent (in) :: x
        real(8), intent (in) :: y
        res = merge(y, merge(x, max(x, y), y /= y), x /= x)
    end function
    real(4) function fmax44(x, y) result (res)
        real(4), intent (in) :: x
        real(4), intent (in) :: y
        res = merge(y, merge(x, max(x, y), y /= y), x /= x)
    end function
    real(8) function fmax84(x, y) result(res)
        real(8), intent (in) :: x
        real(4), intent (in) :: y
        res = merge(dble(y), merge(x, max(x, dble(y)), y /= y), x /= x)
    end function
    real(8) function fmax48(x, y) result(res)
        real(4), intent (in) :: x
        real(8), intent (in) :: y
        res = merge(y, merge(dble(x), max(dble(x), y), y /= y), x /= x)
    end function
    real(8) function fmin88(x, y) result (res)
        real(8), intent (in) :: x
        real(8), intent (in) :: y
        res = merge(y, merge(x, min(x, y), y /= y), x /= x)
    end function
    real(4) function fmin44(x, y) result (res)
        real(4), intent (in) :: x
        real(4), intent (in) :: y
        res = merge(y, merge(x, min(x, y), y /= y), x /= x)
    end function
    real(8) function fmin84(x, y) result(res)
        real(8), intent (in) :: x
        real(4), intent (in) :: y
        res = merge(dble(y), merge(x, min(x, dble(y)), y /= y), x /= x)
    end function
    real(8) function fmin48(x, y) result(res)
        real(4), intent (in) :: x
        real(8), intent (in) :: y
        res = merge(y, merge(dble(x), min(dble(x), y), y /= y), x /= x)
    end function
end module

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
use fmin_fmax_functions
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    code = x
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	return x;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b):
	return x

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	return x
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = x;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := x

Derivation

1. Initial program 92.2%

   \[\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \]

2. Taylor expanded in x around inf

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} \]
3. Step-by-step derivation

4. Applied rewrites 26.5%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Developer Target 1: 97.6% accurate, 0.8× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_1 := z \cdot \left(b \cdot a + y\right) + \left(x + t \cdot a\right)\\ \mathbf{if}\;z < -11820553527347888000:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_1\\ \mathbf{elif}\;z < 4.7589743188364287 \cdot 10^{-122}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(b \cdot z + t\right) \cdot a + \left(z \cdot y + x\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_1\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_1 (+ (* z (+ (* b a) y)) (+ x (* t a)))))
   (if (< z -11820553527347888000.0)
     t_1
     (if (< z 4.7589743188364287e-122)
       (+ (* (+ (* b z) t) a) (+ (* z y) x))
       t_1))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double t_1 = (z * ((b * a) + y)) + (x + (t * a));
	double tmp;
	if (z < -11820553527347888000.0) {
		tmp = t_1;
	} else if (z < 4.7589743188364287e-122) {
		tmp = (((b * z) + t) * a) + ((z * y) + x);
	} else {
		tmp = t_1;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

module fmin_fmax_functions
    implicit none
    private
    public fmax
    public fmin

    interface fmax
        module procedure fmax88
        module procedure fmax44
        module procedure fmax84
        module procedure fmax48
    end interface
    interface fmin
        module procedure fmin88
        module procedure fmin44
        module procedure fmin84
        module procedure fmin48
    end interface
contains
    real(8) function fmax88(x, y) result (res)
        real(8), intent (in) :: x
        real(8), intent (in) :: y
        res = merge(y, merge(x, max(x, y), y /= y), x /= x)
    end function
    real(4) function fmax44(x, y) result (res)
        real(4), intent (in) :: x
        real(4), intent (in) :: y
        res = merge(y, merge(x, max(x, y), y /= y), x /= x)
    end function
    real(8) function fmax84(x, y) result(res)
        real(8), intent (in) :: x
        real(4), intent (in) :: y
        res = merge(dble(y), merge(x, max(x, dble(y)), y /= y), x /= x)
    end function
    real(8) function fmax48(x, y) result(res)
        real(4), intent (in) :: x
        real(8), intent (in) :: y
        res = merge(y, merge(dble(x), max(dble(x), y), y /= y), x /= x)
    end function
    real(8) function fmin88(x, y) result (res)
        real(8), intent (in) :: x
        real(8), intent (in) :: y
        res = merge(y, merge(x, min(x, y), y /= y), x /= x)
    end function
    real(4) function fmin44(x, y) result (res)
        real(4), intent (in) :: x
        real(4), intent (in) :: y
        res = merge(y, merge(x, min(x, y), y /= y), x /= x)
    end function
    real(8) function fmin84(x, y) result(res)
        real(8), intent (in) :: x
        real(4), intent (in) :: y
        res = merge(dble(y), merge(x, min(x, dble(y)), y /= y), x /= x)
    end function
    real(8) function fmin48(x, y) result(res)
        real(4), intent (in) :: x
        real(8), intent (in) :: y
        res = merge(y, merge(dble(x), min(dble(x), y), y /= y), x /= x)
    end function
end module

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
use fmin_fmax_functions
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8) :: t_1
    real(8) :: tmp
    t_1 = (z * ((b * a) + y)) + (x + (t * a))
    if (z < (-11820553527347888000.0d0)) then
        tmp = t_1
    else if (z < 4.7589743188364287d-122) then
        tmp = (((b * z) + t) * a) + ((z * y) + x)
    else
        tmp = t_1
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double t_1 = (z * ((b * a) + y)) + (x + (t * a));
	double tmp;
	if (z < -11820553527347888000.0) {
		tmp = t_1;
	} else if (z < 4.7589743188364287e-122) {
		tmp = (((b * z) + t) * a) + ((z * y) + x);
	} else {
		tmp = t_1;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b):
	t_1 = (z * ((b * a) + y)) + (x + (t * a))
	tmp = 0
	if z < -11820553527347888000.0:
		tmp = t_1
	elif z < 4.7589743188364287e-122:
		tmp = (((b * z) + t) * a) + ((z * y) + x)
	else:
		tmp = t_1
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	t_1 = Float64(Float64(z * Float64(Float64(b * a) + y)) + Float64(x + Float64(t * a)))
	tmp = 0.0
	if (z < -11820553527347888000.0)
		tmp = t_1;
	elseif (z < 4.7589743188364287e-122)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(b * z) + t) * a) + Float64(Float64(z * y) + x));
	else
		tmp = t_1;
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	t_1 = (z * ((b * a) + y)) + (x + (t * a));
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (z < -11820553527347888000.0)
		tmp = t_1;
	elseif (z < 4.7589743188364287e-122)
		tmp = (((b * z) + t) * a) + ((z * y) + x);
	else
		tmp = t_1;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := Block[{t$95$1 = N[(N[(z * N[(N[(b * a), $MachinePrecision] + y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(x + N[(t * a), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, If[Less[z, -11820553527347888000.0], t$95$1, If[Less[z, 4.7589743188364287e-122], N[(N[(N[(N[(b * z), $MachinePrecision] + t), $MachinePrecision] * a), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(z * y), $MachinePrecision] + x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], t$95$1]]]

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2025096 
(FPCore (x y z t a b)
  :name "Graphics.Rasterific.CubicBezier:cachedBezierAt from Rasterific-0.6.1"
  :precision binary64

  :alt
  (! :herbie-platform default (if (< z -11820553527347888000) (+ (* z (+ (* b a) y)) (+ x (* t a))) (if (< z 47589743188364287/1000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000) (+ (* (+ (* b z) t) a) (+ (* z y) x)) (+ (* z (+ (* b a) y)) (+ x (* t a))))))

  (+ (+ (+ x (* y z)) (* t a)) (* (* a z) b)))