Graphics.Rasterific.CubicBezier:cachedBezierAt from Rasterific-0.6.1

Percentage Accurate: 92.2% → 96.5%

Time: 3.2s

Alternatives: 10

Speedup: 0.5×

• 33.4% of points produce a very large (infinite) output. You may want to add a precondition.

Specification

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b)
 :precision binary64
 (+ (+ (+ x (* y z)) (* t a)) (* (* a z) b)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	return ((x + (y * z)) + (t * a)) + ((a * z) * b);
}

Fortran

module fmin_fmax_functions
    implicit none
    private
    public fmax
    public fmin

    interface fmax
        module procedure fmax88
        module procedure fmax44
        module procedure fmax84
        module procedure fmax48
    end interface
    interface fmin
        module procedure fmin88
        module procedure fmin44
        module procedure fmin84
        module procedure fmin48
    end interface
contains
    real(8) function fmax88(x, y) result (res)
        real(8), intent (in) :: x
        real(8), intent (in) :: y
        res = merge(y, merge(x, max(x, y), y /= y), x /= x)
    end function
    real(4) function fmax44(x, y) result (res)
        real(4), intent (in) :: x
        real(4), intent (in) :: y
        res = merge(y, merge(x, max(x, y), y /= y), x /= x)
    end function
    real(8) function fmax84(x, y) result(res)
        real(8), intent (in) :: x
        real(4), intent (in) :: y
        res = merge(dble(y), merge(x, max(x, dble(y)), y /= y), x /= x)
    end function
    real(8) function fmax48(x, y) result(res)
        real(4), intent (in) :: x
        real(8), intent (in) :: y
        res = merge(y, merge(dble(x), max(dble(x), y), y /= y), x /= x)
    end function
    real(8) function fmin88(x, y) result (res)
        real(8), intent (in) :: x
        real(8), intent (in) :: y
        res = merge(y, merge(x, min(x, y), y /= y), x /= x)
    end function
    real(4) function fmin44(x, y) result (res)
        real(4), intent (in) :: x
        real(4), intent (in) :: y
        res = merge(y, merge(x, min(x, y), y /= y), x /= x)
    end function
    real(8) function fmin84(x, y) result(res)
        real(8), intent (in) :: x
        real(4), intent (in) :: y
        res = merge(dble(y), merge(x, min(x, dble(y)), y /= y), x /= x)
    end function
    real(8) function fmin48(x, y) result(res)
        real(4), intent (in) :: x
        real(8), intent (in) :: y
        res = merge(y, merge(dble(x), min(dble(x), y), y /= y), x /= x)
    end function
end module

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
use fmin_fmax_functions
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    code = ((x + (y * z)) + (t * a)) + ((a * z) * b)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	return ((x + (y * z)) + (t * a)) + ((a * z) * b);
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b):
	return ((x + (y * z)) + (t * a)) + ((a * z) * b)

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(x + Float64(y * z)) + Float64(t * a)) + Float64(Float64(a * z) * b))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = ((x + (y * z)) + (t * a)) + ((a * z) * b);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := N[(N[(N[(x + N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(t * a), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(a * z), $MachinePrecision] * b), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Initial Program: 92.2% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b)
 :precision binary64
 (+ (+ (+ x (* y z)) (* t a)) (* (* a z) b)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	return ((x + (y * z)) + (t * a)) + ((a * z) * b);
}

Fortran

module fmin_fmax_functions
    implicit none
    private
    public fmax
    public fmin

    interface fmax
        module procedure fmax88
        module procedure fmax44
        module procedure fmax84
        module procedure fmax48
    end interface
    interface fmin
        module procedure fmin88
        module procedure fmin44
        module procedure fmin84
        module procedure fmin48
    end interface
contains
    real(8) function fmax88(x, y) result (res)
        real(8), intent (in) :: x
        real(8), intent (in) :: y
        res = merge(y, merge(x, max(x, y), y /= y), x /= x)
    end function
    real(4) function fmax44(x, y) result (res)
        real(4), intent (in) :: x
        real(4), intent (in) :: y
        res = merge(y, merge(x, max(x, y), y /= y), x /= x)
    end function
    real(8) function fmax84(x, y) result(res)
        real(8), intent (in) :: x
        real(4), intent (in) :: y
        res = merge(dble(y), merge(x, max(x, dble(y)), y /= y), x /= x)
    end function
    real(8) function fmax48(x, y) result(res)
        real(4), intent (in) :: x
        real(8), intent (in) :: y
        res = merge(y, merge(dble(x), max(dble(x), y), y /= y), x /= x)
    end function
    real(8) function fmin88(x, y) result (res)
        real(8), intent (in) :: x
        real(8), intent (in) :: y
        res = merge(y, merge(x, min(x, y), y /= y), x /= x)
    end function
    real(4) function fmin44(x, y) result (res)
        real(4), intent (in) :: x
        real(4), intent (in) :: y
        res = merge(y, merge(x, min(x, y), y /= y), x /= x)
    end function
    real(8) function fmin84(x, y) result(res)
        real(8), intent (in) :: x
        real(4), intent (in) :: y
        res = merge(dble(y), merge(x, min(x, dble(y)), y /= y), x /= x)
    end function
    real(8) function fmin48(x, y) result(res)
        real(4), intent (in) :: x
        real(8), intent (in) :: y
        res = merge(y, merge(dble(x), min(dble(x), y), y /= y), x /= x)
    end function
end module

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
use fmin_fmax_functions
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    code = ((x + (y * z)) + (t * a)) + ((a * z) * b)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	return ((x + (y * z)) + (t * a)) + ((a * z) * b);
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b):
	return ((x + (y * z)) + (t * a)) + ((a * z) * b)

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(x + Float64(y * z)) + Float64(t * a)) + Float64(Float64(a * z) * b))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = ((x + (y * z)) + (t * a)) + ((a * z) * b);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := N[(N[(N[(x + N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(t * a), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(a * z), $MachinePrecision] * b), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Alternative 1: 96.5% accurate, 0.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_1 := \left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b\\ \mathbf{if}\;t\_1 \leq \infty:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_1\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(b, z, t\right), a, x\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_1 (+ (+ (+ x (* y z)) (* t a)) (* (* a z) b))))
   (if (<= t_1 INFINITY) t_1 (fma (fma b z t) a x))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double t_1 = ((x + (y * z)) + (t * a)) + ((a * z) * b);
	double tmp;
	if (t_1 <= ((double) INFINITY)) {
		tmp = t_1;
	} else {
		tmp = fma(fma(b, z, t), a, x);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	t_1 = Float64(Float64(Float64(x + Float64(y * z)) + Float64(t * a)) + Float64(Float64(a * z) * b))
	tmp = 0.0
	if (t_1 <= Inf)
		tmp = t_1;
	else
		tmp = fma(fma(b, z, t), a, x);
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := Block[{t$95$1 = N[(N[(N[(x + N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(t * a), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(a * z), $MachinePrecision] * b), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[t$95$1, Infinity], t$95$1, N[(N[(b * z + t), $MachinePrecision] * a + x), $MachinePrecision]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (+.f64 (+.f64 (+.f64 x (*.f64 y z)) (*.f64 t a)) (*.f64 (*.f64 a z) b)) < +inf.0

   1. Initial program 98.4%

      \[\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   if +inf.0 < (+.f64 (+.f64 (+.f64 x (*.f64 y z)) (*.f64 t a)) (*.f64 (*.f64 a z) b))

   1. Initial program 0.0%

      \[\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in y around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \left(a \cdot t + a \cdot \left(b \cdot z\right)\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. distribute-lft-in N/A

         \[\leadsto x + a \cdot \color{blue}{\left(t + b \cdot z\right)} \]

      2. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \left(t + b \cdot z\right) + \color{blue}{x} \]

      3. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \left(t + b \cdot z\right) \cdot a + x \]

      4. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(t + b \cdot z, \color{blue}{a}, x\right) \]

      5. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(b \cdot z + t, a, x\right) \]

      6. lower-fma.f64 80.3

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(b, z, t\right), a, x\right) \]

   5. Applied rewrites 80.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(b, z, t\right), a, x\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 2: 40.3% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -3.3 \cdot 10^{+81}:\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot y\\ \mathbf{elif}\;y \leq -7.2 \cdot 10^{-60}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot t\\ \mathbf{elif}\;y \leq 4.1 \cdot 10^{-132}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \mathbf{elif}\;y \leq 3.9 \cdot 10^{+33}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot t\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot y\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= y -3.3e+81)
   (* z y)
   (if (<= y -7.2e-60)
     (* a t)
     (if (<= y 4.1e-132) x (if (<= y 3.9e+33) (* a t) (* z y))))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= -3.3e+81) {
		tmp = z * y;
	} else if (y <= -7.2e-60) {
		tmp = a * t;
	} else if (y <= 4.1e-132) {
		tmp = x;
	} else if (y <= 3.9e+33) {
		tmp = a * t;
	} else {
		tmp = z * y;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

module fmin_fmax_functions
    implicit none
    private
    public fmax
    public fmin

    interface fmax
        module procedure fmax88
        module procedure fmax44
        module procedure fmax84
        module procedure fmax48
    end interface
    interface fmin
        module procedure fmin88
        module procedure fmin44
        module procedure fmin84
        module procedure fmin48
    end interface
contains
    real(8) function fmax88(x, y) result (res)
        real(8), intent (in) :: x
        real(8), intent (in) :: y
        res = merge(y, merge(x, max(x, y), y /= y), x /= x)
    end function
    real(4) function fmax44(x, y) result (res)
        real(4), intent (in) :: x
        real(4), intent (in) :: y
        res = merge(y, merge(x, max(x, y), y /= y), x /= x)
    end function
    real(8) function fmax84(x, y) result(res)
        real(8), intent (in) :: x
        real(4), intent (in) :: y
        res = merge(dble(y), merge(x, max(x, dble(y)), y /= y), x /= x)
    end function
    real(8) function fmax48(x, y) result(res)
        real(4), intent (in) :: x
        real(8), intent (in) :: y
        res = merge(y, merge(dble(x), max(dble(x), y), y /= y), x /= x)
    end function
    real(8) function fmin88(x, y) result (res)
        real(8), intent (in) :: x
        real(8), intent (in) :: y
        res = merge(y, merge(x, min(x, y), y /= y), x /= x)
    end function
    real(4) function fmin44(x, y) result (res)
        real(4), intent (in) :: x
        real(4), intent (in) :: y
        res = merge(y, merge(x, min(x, y), y /= y), x /= x)
    end function
    real(8) function fmin84(x, y) result(res)
        real(8), intent (in) :: x
        real(4), intent (in) :: y
        res = merge(dble(y), merge(x, min(x, dble(y)), y /= y), x /= x)
    end function
    real(8) function fmin48(x, y) result(res)
        real(4), intent (in) :: x
        real(8), intent (in) :: y
        res = merge(y, merge(dble(x), min(dble(x), y), y /= y), x /= x)
    end function
end module

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
use fmin_fmax_functions
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (y <= (-3.3d+81)) then
        tmp = z * y
    else if (y <= (-7.2d-60)) then
        tmp = a * t
    else if (y <= 4.1d-132) then
        tmp = x
    else if (y <= 3.9d+33) then
        tmp = a * t
    else
        tmp = z * y
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= -3.3e+81) {
		tmp = z * y;
	} else if (y <= -7.2e-60) {
		tmp = a * t;
	} else if (y <= 4.1e-132) {
		tmp = x;
	} else if (y <= 3.9e+33) {
		tmp = a * t;
	} else {
		tmp = z * y;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b):
	tmp = 0
	if y <= -3.3e+81:
		tmp = z * y
	elif y <= -7.2e-60:
		tmp = a * t
	elif y <= 4.1e-132:
		tmp = x
	elif y <= 3.9e+33:
		tmp = a * t
	else:
		tmp = z * y
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (y <= -3.3e+81)
		tmp = Float64(z * y);
	elseif (y <= -7.2e-60)
		tmp = Float64(a * t);
	elseif (y <= 4.1e-132)
		tmp = x;
	elseif (y <= 3.9e+33)
		tmp = Float64(a * t);
	else
		tmp = Float64(z * y);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (y <= -3.3e+81)
		tmp = z * y;
	elseif (y <= -7.2e-60)
		tmp = a * t;
	elseif (y <= 4.1e-132)
		tmp = x;
	elseif (y <= 3.9e+33)
		tmp = a * t;
	else
		tmp = z * y;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := If[LessEqual[y, -3.3e+81], N[(z * y), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[y, -7.2e-60], N[(a * t), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[y, 4.1e-132], x, If[LessEqual[y, 3.9e+33], N[(a * t), $MachinePrecision], N[(z * y), $MachinePrecision]]]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if y < -3.3e81 or 3.9000000000000002e33 < y

   1. Initial program 88.9%

      \[\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in y around inf

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot z} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto z \cdot \color{blue}{y} \]

      2. lower-*.f64 62.9

         \[\leadsto z \cdot \color{blue}{y} \]

   5. Applied rewrites 62.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot y} \]

   if -3.3e81 < y < -7.2e-60 or 4.10000000000000007e-132 < y < 3.9000000000000002e33

   1. Initial program 89.6%

      \[\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in t around inf

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot t} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. lower-*.f64 47.9

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \color{blue}{t} \]

   5. Applied rewrites 47.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot t} \]

   if -7.2e-60 < y < 4.10000000000000007e-132

   1. Initial program 93.4%

      \[\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around inf

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

   5. Applied rewrites 38.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.
4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 3: 86.3% accurate, 1.2× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;a \leq -2.05 \cdot 10^{+81} \lor \neg \left(a \leq 3.2 \cdot 10^{+94}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(b, z, t\right), a, x\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(a, t, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, y, x\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= a -2.05e+81) (not (<= a 3.2e+94)))
   (fma (fma b z t) a x)
   (fma a t (fma z y x))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if ((a <= -2.05e+81) || !(a <= 3.2e+94)) {
		tmp = fma(fma(b, z, t), a, x);
	} else {
		tmp = fma(a, t, fma(z, y, x));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((a <= -2.05e+81) || !(a <= 3.2e+94))
		tmp = fma(fma(b, z, t), a, x);
	else
		tmp = fma(a, t, fma(z, y, x));
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := If[Or[LessEqual[a, -2.05e+81], N[Not[LessEqual[a, 3.2e+94]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(N[(b * z + t), $MachinePrecision] * a + x), $MachinePrecision], N[(a * t + N[(z * y + x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if a < -2.05000000000000006e81 or 3.20000000000000014e94 < a

   1. Initial program 79.2%

      \[\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in y around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \left(a \cdot t + a \cdot \left(b \cdot z\right)\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. distribute-lft-in N/A

         \[\leadsto x + a \cdot \color{blue}{\left(t + b \cdot z\right)} \]

      2. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \left(t + b \cdot z\right) + \color{blue}{x} \]

      3. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \left(t + b \cdot z\right) \cdot a + x \]

      4. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(t + b \cdot z, \color{blue}{a}, x\right) \]

      5. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(b \cdot z + t, a, x\right) \]

      6. lower-fma.f64 92.1

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(b, z, t\right), a, x\right) \]

   5. Applied rewrites 92.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(b, z, t\right), a, x\right)} \]

   if -2.05000000000000006e81 < a < 3.20000000000000014e94

   1. Initial program 98.0%

      \[\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in b around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \left(a \cdot t + y \cdot z\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto x + \left(y \cdot z + \color{blue}{a \cdot t}\right) \]

      2. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto x + \left(y \cdot z + t \cdot \color{blue}{a}\right) \]

      3. lift-*.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto x + \left(y \cdot z + t \cdot \color{blue}{a}\right) \]

      4. associate-+l+ N/A

         \[\leadsto \left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \color{blue}{t \cdot a} \]

      5. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto t \cdot a + \color{blue}{\left(x + y \cdot z\right)} \]

      6. lift-*.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto t \cdot a + \left(\color{blue}{x} + y \cdot z\right) \]

      7. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto a \cdot t + \left(\color{blue}{x} + y \cdot z\right) \]

      8. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(a, \color{blue}{t}, x + y \cdot z\right) \]

      9. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(a, t, y \cdot z + x\right) \]

      10. *-commutative N/A

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(a, t, z \cdot y + x\right) \]

      11. lower-fma.f64 91.3

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(a, t, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, y, x\right)\right) \]

   5. Applied rewrites 91.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(a, t, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, y, x\right)\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 91.6%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;a \leq -2.05 \cdot 10^{+81} \lor \neg \left(a \leq 3.2 \cdot 10^{+94}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(b, z, t\right), a, x\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(a, t, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, y, x\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 4: 74.8% accurate, 1.2× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;a \leq -1.9 \cdot 10^{+81} \lor \neg \left(a \leq 2.2 \cdot 10^{+20}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(b, z, t\right) \cdot a\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(z, y, x\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= a -1.9e+81) (not (<= a 2.2e+20))) (* (fma b z t) a) (fma z y x)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if ((a <= -1.9e+81) || !(a <= 2.2e+20)) {
		tmp = fma(b, z, t) * a;
	} else {
		tmp = fma(z, y, x);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((a <= -1.9e+81) || !(a <= 2.2e+20))
		tmp = Float64(fma(b, z, t) * a);
	else
		tmp = fma(z, y, x);
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := If[Or[LessEqual[a, -1.9e+81], N[Not[LessEqual[a, 2.2e+20]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(N[(b * z + t), $MachinePrecision] * a), $MachinePrecision], N[(z * y + x), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if a < -1.9e81 or 2.2e20 < a

   1. Initial program 80.8%

      \[\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in a around inf

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(t + b \cdot z\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \left(t + b \cdot z\right) \cdot \color{blue}{a} \]

      2. lower-*.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \left(t + b \cdot z\right) \cdot \color{blue}{a} \]

      3. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \left(b \cdot z + t\right) \cdot a \]

      4. lower-fma.f64 80.4

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(b, z, t\right) \cdot a \]

   5. Applied rewrites 80.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, z, t\right) \cdot a} \]

   if -1.9e81 < a < 2.2e20

   1. Initial program 99.2%

      \[\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in a around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + y \cdot z} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto y \cdot z + \color{blue}{x} \]

      2. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto z \cdot y + x \]

      3. lower-fma.f64 78.9

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z, \color{blue}{y}, x\right) \]

   5. Applied rewrites 78.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, y, x\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 79.6%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;a \leq -1.9 \cdot 10^{+81} \lor \neg \left(a \leq 2.2 \cdot 10^{+20}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(b, z, t\right) \cdot a\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(z, y, x\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 5: 74.8% accurate, 1.2× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -8.5 \cdot 10^{-11} \lor \neg \left(z \leq 1.65 \cdot 10^{-31}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, y\right) \cdot z\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(a, t, x\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= z -8.5e-11) (not (<= z 1.65e-31))) (* (fma b a y) z) (fma a t x)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z <= -8.5e-11) || !(z <= 1.65e-31)) {
		tmp = fma(b, a, y) * z;
	} else {
		tmp = fma(a, t, x);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((z <= -8.5e-11) || !(z <= 1.65e-31))
		tmp = Float64(fma(b, a, y) * z);
	else
		tmp = fma(a, t, x);
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := If[Or[LessEqual[z, -8.5e-11], N[Not[LessEqual[z, 1.65e-31]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(N[(b * a + y), $MachinePrecision] * z), $MachinePrecision], N[(a * t + x), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if z < -8.50000000000000037e-11 or 1.65e-31 < z

   1. Initial program 83.7%

      \[\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in z around inf

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(y + a \cdot b\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \left(y + a \cdot b\right) \cdot \color{blue}{z} \]

      2. lower-*.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \left(y + a \cdot b\right) \cdot \color{blue}{z} \]

      3. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \left(a \cdot b + y\right) \cdot z \]

      4. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \left(b \cdot a + y\right) \cdot z \]

      5. lower-fma.f64 75.7

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, y\right) \cdot z \]

   5. Applied rewrites 75.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, y\right) \cdot z} \]

   if -8.50000000000000037e-11 < z < 1.65e-31

   1. Initial program 99.1%

      \[\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in z around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + a \cdot t} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto a \cdot t + \color{blue}{x} \]

      2. lower-fma.f64 81.9

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(a, \color{blue}{t}, x\right) \]

   5. Applied rewrites 81.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(a, t, x\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 78.5%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -8.5 \cdot 10^{-11} \lor \neg \left(z \leq 1.65 \cdot 10^{-31}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, y\right) \cdot z\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(a, t, x\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 6: 63.0% accurate, 1.6× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -4.2 \cdot 10^{+81} \lor \neg \left(y \leq 3.9 \cdot 10^{+33}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(z, y, x\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(a, t, x\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= y -4.2e+81) (not (<= y 3.9e+33))) (fma z y x) (fma a t x)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if ((y <= -4.2e+81) || !(y <= 3.9e+33)) {
		tmp = fma(z, y, x);
	} else {
		tmp = fma(a, t, x);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((y <= -4.2e+81) || !(y <= 3.9e+33))
		tmp = fma(z, y, x);
	else
		tmp = fma(a, t, x);
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := If[Or[LessEqual[y, -4.2e+81], N[Not[LessEqual[y, 3.9e+33]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(z * y + x), $MachinePrecision], N[(a * t + x), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if y < -4.1999999999999997e81 or 3.9000000000000002e33 < y

   1. Initial program 88.9%

      \[\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in a around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + y \cdot z} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto y \cdot z + \color{blue}{x} \]

      2. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto z \cdot y + x \]

      3. lower-fma.f64 75.6

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z, \color{blue}{y}, x\right) \]

   5. Applied rewrites 75.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, y, x\right)} \]

   if -4.1999999999999997e81 < y < 3.9000000000000002e33

   1. Initial program 91.8%

      \[\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in z around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + a \cdot t} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto a \cdot t + \color{blue}{x} \]

      2. lower-fma.f64 66.8

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(a, \color{blue}{t}, x\right) \]

   5. Applied rewrites 66.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(a, t, x\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 70.2%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -4.2 \cdot 10^{+81} \lor \neg \left(y \leq 3.9 \cdot 10^{+33}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(z, y, x\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(a, t, x\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 7: 57.0% accurate, 1.6× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -1.6 \cdot 10^{+109} \lor \neg \left(y \leq 4.8 \cdot 10^{+33}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot y\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(a, t, x\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= y -1.6e+109) (not (<= y 4.8e+33))) (* z y) (fma a t x)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if ((y <= -1.6e+109) || !(y <= 4.8e+33)) {
		tmp = z * y;
	} else {
		tmp = fma(a, t, x);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((y <= -1.6e+109) || !(y <= 4.8e+33))
		tmp = Float64(z * y);
	else
		tmp = fma(a, t, x);
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := If[Or[LessEqual[y, -1.6e+109], N[Not[LessEqual[y, 4.8e+33]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(z * y), $MachinePrecision], N[(a * t + x), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if y < -1.6000000000000001e109 or 4.8e33 < y

   1. Initial program 88.2%

      \[\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in y around inf

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot z} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto z \cdot \color{blue}{y} \]

      2. lower-*.f64 64.6

         \[\leadsto z \cdot \color{blue}{y} \]

   5. Applied rewrites 64.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot y} \]

   if -1.6000000000000001e109 < y < 4.8e33

   1. Initial program 92.1%

      \[\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in z around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + a \cdot t} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto a \cdot t + \color{blue}{x} \]

      2. lower-fma.f64 66.2

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(a, \color{blue}{t}, x\right) \]

   5. Applied rewrites 66.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(a, t, x\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 65.6%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -1.6 \cdot 10^{+109} \lor \neg \left(y \leq 4.8 \cdot 10^{+33}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot y\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(a, t, x\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 8: 80.1% accurate, 1.6× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;a \leq 4.2 \cdot 10^{+94}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(a, t, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, y, x\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(b, z, t\right) \cdot a\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= a 4.2e+94) (fma a t (fma z y x)) (* (fma b z t) a)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if (a <= 4.2e+94) {
		tmp = fma(a, t, fma(z, y, x));
	} else {
		tmp = fma(b, z, t) * a;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (a <= 4.2e+94)
		tmp = fma(a, t, fma(z, y, x));
	else
		tmp = Float64(fma(b, z, t) * a);
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := If[LessEqual[a, 4.2e+94], N[(a * t + N[(z * y + x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[(b * z + t), $MachinePrecision] * a), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if a < 4.19999999999999979e94

   1. Initial program 93.8%

      \[\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in b around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \left(a \cdot t + y \cdot z\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto x + \left(y \cdot z + \color{blue}{a \cdot t}\right) \]

      2. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto x + \left(y \cdot z + t \cdot \color{blue}{a}\right) \]

      3. lift-*.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto x + \left(y \cdot z + t \cdot \color{blue}{a}\right) \]

      4. associate-+l+ N/A

         \[\leadsto \left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \color{blue}{t \cdot a} \]

      5. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto t \cdot a + \color{blue}{\left(x + y \cdot z\right)} \]

      6. lift-*.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto t \cdot a + \left(\color{blue}{x} + y \cdot z\right) \]

      7. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto a \cdot t + \left(\color{blue}{x} + y \cdot z\right) \]

      8. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(a, \color{blue}{t}, x + y \cdot z\right) \]

      9. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(a, t, y \cdot z + x\right) \]

      10. *-commutative N/A

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(a, t, z \cdot y + x\right) \]

      11. lower-fma.f64 87.4

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(a, t, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, y, x\right)\right) \]

   5. Applied rewrites 87.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(a, t, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, y, x\right)\right)} \]

   if 4.19999999999999979e94 < a

   1. Initial program 77.1%

      \[\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in a around inf

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(t + b \cdot z\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \left(t + b \cdot z\right) \cdot \color{blue}{a} \]

      2. lower-*.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \left(t + b \cdot z\right) \cdot \color{blue}{a} \]

      3. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \left(b \cdot z + t\right) \cdot a \]

      4. lower-fma.f64 86.2

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(b, z, t\right) \cdot a \]

   5. Applied rewrites 86.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, z, t\right) \cdot a} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 9: 39.1% accurate, 1.7× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;a \leq -1.3 \cdot 10^{-21} \lor \neg \left(a \leq 2.2 \cdot 10^{+20}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot t\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= a -1.3e-21) (not (<= a 2.2e+20))) (* a t) x))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if ((a <= -1.3e-21) || !(a <= 2.2e+20)) {
		tmp = a * t;
	} else {
		tmp = x;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

module fmin_fmax_functions
    implicit none
    private
    public fmax
    public fmin

    interface fmax
        module procedure fmax88
        module procedure fmax44
        module procedure fmax84
        module procedure fmax48
    end interface
    interface fmin
        module procedure fmin88
        module procedure fmin44
        module procedure fmin84
        module procedure fmin48
    end interface
contains
    real(8) function fmax88(x, y) result (res)
        real(8), intent (in) :: x
        real(8), intent (in) :: y
        res = merge(y, merge(x, max(x, y), y /= y), x /= x)
    end function
    real(4) function fmax44(x, y) result (res)
        real(4), intent (in) :: x
        real(4), intent (in) :: y
        res = merge(y, merge(x, max(x, y), y /= y), x /= x)
    end function
    real(8) function fmax84(x, y) result(res)
        real(8), intent (in) :: x
        real(4), intent (in) :: y
        res = merge(dble(y), merge(x, max(x, dble(y)), y /= y), x /= x)
    end function
    real(8) function fmax48(x, y) result(res)
        real(4), intent (in) :: x
        real(8), intent (in) :: y
        res = merge(y, merge(dble(x), max(dble(x), y), y /= y), x /= x)
    end function
    real(8) function fmin88(x, y) result (res)
        real(8), intent (in) :: x
        real(8), intent (in) :: y
        res = merge(y, merge(x, min(x, y), y /= y), x /= x)
    end function
    real(4) function fmin44(x, y) result (res)
        real(4), intent (in) :: x
        real(4), intent (in) :: y
        res = merge(y, merge(x, min(x, y), y /= y), x /= x)
    end function
    real(8) function fmin84(x, y) result(res)
        real(8), intent (in) :: x
        real(4), intent (in) :: y
        res = merge(dble(y), merge(x, min(x, dble(y)), y /= y), x /= x)
    end function
    real(8) function fmin48(x, y) result(res)
        real(4), intent (in) :: x
        real(8), intent (in) :: y
        res = merge(y, merge(dble(x), min(dble(x), y), y /= y), x /= x)
    end function
end module

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
use fmin_fmax_functions
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((a <= (-1.3d-21)) .or. (.not. (a <= 2.2d+20))) then
        tmp = a * t
    else
        tmp = x
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if ((a <= -1.3e-21) || !(a <= 2.2e+20)) {
		tmp = a * t;
	} else {
		tmp = x;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b):
	tmp = 0
	if (a <= -1.3e-21) or not (a <= 2.2e+20):
		tmp = a * t
	else:
		tmp = x
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((a <= -1.3e-21) || !(a <= 2.2e+20))
		tmp = Float64(a * t);
	else
		tmp = x;
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((a <= -1.3e-21) || ~((a <= 2.2e+20)))
		tmp = a * t;
	else
		tmp = x;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := If[Or[LessEqual[a, -1.3e-21], N[Not[LessEqual[a, 2.2e+20]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(a * t), $MachinePrecision], x]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if a < -1.30000000000000009e-21 or 2.2e20 < a

   1. Initial program 82.7%

      \[\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in t around inf

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot t} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. lower-*.f64 45.3

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \color{blue}{t} \]

   5. Applied rewrites 45.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot t} \]

   if -1.30000000000000009e-21 < a < 2.2e20

   1. Initial program 99.2%

      \[\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around inf

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

   5. Applied rewrites 39.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 42.7%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;a \leq -1.3 \cdot 10^{-21} \lor \neg \left(a \leq 2.2 \cdot 10^{+20}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot t\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 10: 25.8% accurate, 30.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b) :precision binary64 x)

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	return x;
}

Fortran

module fmin_fmax_functions
    implicit none
    private
    public fmax
    public fmin

    interface fmax
        module procedure fmax88
        module procedure fmax44
        module procedure fmax84
        module procedure fmax48
    end interface
    interface fmin
        module procedure fmin88
        module procedure fmin44
        module procedure fmin84
        module procedure fmin48
    end interface
contains
    real(8) function fmax88(x, y) result (res)
        real(8), intent (in) :: x
        real(8), intent (in) :: y
        res = merge(y, merge(x, max(x, y), y /= y), x /= x)
    end function
    real(4) function fmax44(x, y) result (res)
        real(4), intent (in) :: x
        real(4), intent (in) :: y
        res = merge(y, merge(x, max(x, y), y /= y), x /= x)
    end function
    real(8) function fmax84(x, y) result(res)
        real(8), intent (in) :: x
        real(4), intent (in) :: y
        res = merge(dble(y), merge(x, max(x, dble(y)), y /= y), x /= x)
    end function
    real(8) function fmax48(x, y) result(res)
        real(4), intent (in) :: x
        real(8), intent (in) :: y
        res = merge(y, merge(dble(x), max(dble(x), y), y /= y), x /= x)
    end function
    real(8) function fmin88(x, y) result (res)
        real(8), intent (in) :: x
        real(8), intent (in) :: y
        res = merge(y, merge(x, min(x, y), y /= y), x /= x)
    end function
    real(4) function fmin44(x, y) result (res)
        real(4), intent (in) :: x
        real(4), intent (in) :: y
        res = merge(y, merge(x, min(x, y), y /= y), x /= x)
    end function
    real(8) function fmin84(x, y) result(res)
        real(8), intent (in) :: x
        real(4), intent (in) :: y
        res = merge(dble(y), merge(x, min(x, dble(y)), y /= y), x /= x)
    end function
    real(8) function fmin48(x, y) result(res)
        real(4), intent (in) :: x
        real(8), intent (in) :: y
        res = merge(y, merge(dble(x), min(dble(x), y), y /= y), x /= x)
    end function
end module

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
use fmin_fmax_functions
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    code = x
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	return x;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b):
	return x

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	return x
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = x;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := x

Derivation

1. Initial program 90.7%

   \[\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \]
2. Add Preprocessing

3. Taylor expanded in x around inf

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} \]
4. Step-by-step derivation

5. Applied rewrites 24.6%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} \]
6. Add Preprocessing

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2025084 
(FPCore (x y z t a b)
  :name "Graphics.Rasterific.CubicBezier:cachedBezierAt from Rasterific-0.6.1"
  :precision binary64

  :alt
  (! :herbie-platform default (if (< z -11820553527347888000) (+ (* z (+ (* b a) y)) (+ x (* t a))) (if (< z 47589743188364287/1000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000) (+ (* (+ (* b z) t) a) (+ (* z y) x)) (+ (* z (+ (* b a) y)) (+ x (* t a))))))

  (+ (+ (+ x (* y z)) (* t a)) (* (* a z) b)))