Graphics.Rasterific.CubicBezier:cachedBezierAt from Rasterific-0.6.1

Percentage Accurate: 92.0% → 96.5%

Time: 3.9s

Alternatives: 11

Speedup: 0.5×

• 32.2% of points produce a very large (infinite) output. You may want to add a precondition.

Specification

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b)
 :precision binary64
 (+ (+ (+ x (* y z)) (* t a)) (* (* a z) b)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	return ((x + (y * z)) + (t * a)) + ((a * z) * b);
}

Fortran

module fmin_fmax_functions
    implicit none
    private
    public fmax
    public fmin

    interface fmax
        module procedure fmax88
        module procedure fmax44
        module procedure fmax84
        module procedure fmax48
    end interface
    interface fmin
        module procedure fmin88
        module procedure fmin44
        module procedure fmin84
        module procedure fmin48
    end interface
contains
    real(8) function fmax88(x, y) result (res)
        real(8), intent (in) :: x
        real(8), intent (in) :: y
        res = merge(y, merge(x, max(x, y), y /= y), x /= x)
    end function
    real(4) function fmax44(x, y) result (res)
        real(4), intent (in) :: x
        real(4), intent (in) :: y
        res = merge(y, merge(x, max(x, y), y /= y), x /= x)
    end function
    real(8) function fmax84(x, y) result(res)
        real(8), intent (in) :: x
        real(4), intent (in) :: y
        res = merge(dble(y), merge(x, max(x, dble(y)), y /= y), x /= x)
    end function
    real(8) function fmax48(x, y) result(res)
        real(4), intent (in) :: x
        real(8), intent (in) :: y
        res = merge(y, merge(dble(x), max(dble(x), y), y /= y), x /= x)
    end function
    real(8) function fmin88(x, y) result (res)
        real(8), intent (in) :: x
        real(8), intent (in) :: y
        res = merge(y, merge(x, min(x, y), y /= y), x /= x)
    end function
    real(4) function fmin44(x, y) result (res)
        real(4), intent (in) :: x
        real(4), intent (in) :: y
        res = merge(y, merge(x, min(x, y), y /= y), x /= x)
    end function
    real(8) function fmin84(x, y) result(res)
        real(8), intent (in) :: x
        real(4), intent (in) :: y
        res = merge(dble(y), merge(x, min(x, dble(y)), y /= y), x /= x)
    end function
    real(8) function fmin48(x, y) result(res)
        real(4), intent (in) :: x
        real(8), intent (in) :: y
        res = merge(y, merge(dble(x), min(dble(x), y), y /= y), x /= x)
    end function
end module

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
use fmin_fmax_functions
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    code = ((x + (y * z)) + (t * a)) + ((a * z) * b)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	return ((x + (y * z)) + (t * a)) + ((a * z) * b);
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b):
	return ((x + (y * z)) + (t * a)) + ((a * z) * b)

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(x + Float64(y * z)) + Float64(t * a)) + Float64(Float64(a * z) * b))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = ((x + (y * z)) + (t * a)) + ((a * z) * b);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := N[(N[(N[(x + N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(t * a), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(a * z), $MachinePrecision] * b), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Initial Program: 92.0% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b)
 :precision binary64
 (+ (+ (+ x (* y z)) (* t a)) (* (* a z) b)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	return ((x + (y * z)) + (t * a)) + ((a * z) * b);
}

Fortran

module fmin_fmax_functions
    implicit none
    private
    public fmax
    public fmin

    interface fmax
        module procedure fmax88
        module procedure fmax44
        module procedure fmax84
        module procedure fmax48
    end interface
    interface fmin
        module procedure fmin88
        module procedure fmin44
        module procedure fmin84
        module procedure fmin48
    end interface
contains
    real(8) function fmax88(x, y) result (res)
        real(8), intent (in) :: x
        real(8), intent (in) :: y
        res = merge(y, merge(x, max(x, y), y /= y), x /= x)
    end function
    real(4) function fmax44(x, y) result (res)
        real(4), intent (in) :: x
        real(4), intent (in) :: y
        res = merge(y, merge(x, max(x, y), y /= y), x /= x)
    end function
    real(8) function fmax84(x, y) result(res)
        real(8), intent (in) :: x
        real(4), intent (in) :: y
        res = merge(dble(y), merge(x, max(x, dble(y)), y /= y), x /= x)
    end function
    real(8) function fmax48(x, y) result(res)
        real(4), intent (in) :: x
        real(8), intent (in) :: y
        res = merge(y, merge(dble(x), max(dble(x), y), y /= y), x /= x)
    end function
    real(8) function fmin88(x, y) result (res)
        real(8), intent (in) :: x
        real(8), intent (in) :: y
        res = merge(y, merge(x, min(x, y), y /= y), x /= x)
    end function
    real(4) function fmin44(x, y) result (res)
        real(4), intent (in) :: x
        real(4), intent (in) :: y
        res = merge(y, merge(x, min(x, y), y /= y), x /= x)
    end function
    real(8) function fmin84(x, y) result(res)
        real(8), intent (in) :: x
        real(4), intent (in) :: y
        res = merge(dble(y), merge(x, min(x, dble(y)), y /= y), x /= x)
    end function
    real(8) function fmin48(x, y) result(res)
        real(4), intent (in) :: x
        real(8), intent (in) :: y
        res = merge(y, merge(dble(x), min(dble(x), y), y /= y), x /= x)
    end function
end module

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
use fmin_fmax_functions
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    code = ((x + (y * z)) + (t * a)) + ((a * z) * b)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	return ((x + (y * z)) + (t * a)) + ((a * z) * b);
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b):
	return ((x + (y * z)) + (t * a)) + ((a * z) * b)

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(x + Float64(y * z)) + Float64(t * a)) + Float64(Float64(a * z) * b))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = ((x + (y * z)) + (t * a)) + ((a * z) * b);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := N[(N[(N[(x + N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(t * a), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(a * z), $MachinePrecision] * b), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Alternative 1: 96.5% accurate, 0.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_1 := \left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b\\ \mathbf{if}\;t\_1 \leq \infty:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_1\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, y\right) \cdot z\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_1 (+ (+ (+ x (* y z)) (* t a)) (* (* a z) b))))
   (if (<= t_1 INFINITY) t_1 (* (fma b a y) z))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double t_1 = ((x + (y * z)) + (t * a)) + ((a * z) * b);
	double tmp;
	if (t_1 <= ((double) INFINITY)) {
		tmp = t_1;
	} else {
		tmp = fma(b, a, y) * z;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	t_1 = Float64(Float64(Float64(x + Float64(y * z)) + Float64(t * a)) + Float64(Float64(a * z) * b))
	tmp = 0.0
	if (t_1 <= Inf)
		tmp = t_1;
	else
		tmp = Float64(fma(b, a, y) * z);
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := Block[{t$95$1 = N[(N[(N[(x + N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(t * a), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(a * z), $MachinePrecision] * b), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[t$95$1, Infinity], t$95$1, N[(N[(b * a + y), $MachinePrecision] * z), $MachinePrecision]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (+.f64 (+.f64 (+.f64 x (*.f64 y z)) (*.f64 t a)) (*.f64 (*.f64 a z) b)) < +inf.0

   1. Initial program 94.7%

      \[\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   if +inf.0 < (+.f64 (+.f64 (+.f64 x (*.f64 y z)) (*.f64 t a)) (*.f64 (*.f64 a z) b))

   1. Initial program 0.0%

      \[\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in z around inf

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(y + a \cdot b\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \left(y + a \cdot b\right) \cdot \color{blue}{z} \]

      2. lower-*.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \left(y + a \cdot b\right) \cdot \color{blue}{z} \]

      3. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \left(a \cdot b + y\right) \cdot z \]

      4. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \left(b \cdot a + y\right) \cdot z \]

      5. lower-fma.f64 94.4

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, y\right) \cdot z \]

   5. Applied rewrites 94.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, y\right) \cdot z} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 2: 60.7% accurate, 0.9× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;a \leq -1.55 \cdot 10^{+200}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(a, t, x\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;a \leq -1.85 \cdot 10^{-15}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(b \cdot z\right) \cdot a\\ \mathbf{elif}\;a \leq 2.5 \cdot 10^{+75}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(z, y, x\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;a \leq 3.8 \cdot 10^{+212}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(a, t, x\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= a -1.55e+200)
   (fma a t x)
   (if (<= a -1.85e-15)
     (* (* b z) a)
     (if (<= a 2.5e+75)
       (fma z y x)
       (if (<= a 3.8e+212) (fma a t x) (* (* a z) b))))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if (a <= -1.55e+200) {
		tmp = fma(a, t, x);
	} else if (a <= -1.85e-15) {
		tmp = (b * z) * a;
	} else if (a <= 2.5e+75) {
		tmp = fma(z, y, x);
	} else if (a <= 3.8e+212) {
		tmp = fma(a, t, x);
	} else {
		tmp = (a * z) * b;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (a <= -1.55e+200)
		tmp = fma(a, t, x);
	elseif (a <= -1.85e-15)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(b * z) * a);
	elseif (a <= 2.5e+75)
		tmp = fma(z, y, x);
	elseif (a <= 3.8e+212)
		tmp = fma(a, t, x);
	else
		tmp = Float64(Float64(a * z) * b);
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := If[LessEqual[a, -1.55e+200], N[(a * t + x), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[a, -1.85e-15], N[(N[(b * z), $MachinePrecision] * a), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[a, 2.5e+75], N[(z * y + x), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[a, 3.8e+212], N[(a * t + x), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[(a * z), $MachinePrecision] * b), $MachinePrecision]]]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 4 regimes

2. if a < -1.54999999999999997e200 or 2.5000000000000001e75 < a < 3.79999999999999988e212

   1. Initial program 81.8%

      \[\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in z around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + a \cdot t} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto a \cdot t + \color{blue}{x} \]

      2. lower-fma.f64 69.7

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(a, \color{blue}{t}, x\right) \]

   5. Applied rewrites 69.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(a, t, x\right)} \]

   if -1.54999999999999997e200 < a < -1.85000000000000008e-15

   1. Initial program 74.1%

      \[\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in b around inf

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(b \cdot z\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \left(b \cdot z\right) \cdot \color{blue}{a} \]

      2. lower-*.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \left(b \cdot z\right) \cdot \color{blue}{a} \]

      3. lower-*.f64 53.5

         \[\leadsto \left(b \cdot z\right) \cdot a \]

   5. Applied rewrites 53.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(b \cdot z\right) \cdot a} \]

   if -1.85000000000000008e-15 < a < 2.5000000000000001e75

   1. Initial program 98.5%

      \[\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in a around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + y \cdot z} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto y \cdot z + \color{blue}{x} \]

      2. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto z \cdot y + x \]

      3. lower-fma.f64 74.3

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z, \color{blue}{y}, x\right) \]

   5. Applied rewrites 74.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, y, x\right)} \]

   if 3.79999999999999988e212 < a

   1. Initial program 68.7%

      \[\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in b around inf

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(b \cdot z\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \left(b \cdot z\right) \cdot \color{blue}{a} \]

      2. lower-*.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \left(b \cdot z\right) \cdot \color{blue}{a} \]

      3. lower-*.f64 62.1

         \[\leadsto \left(b \cdot z\right) \cdot a \]

   5. Applied rewrites 62.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(b \cdot z\right) \cdot a} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. lift-*.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \left(b \cdot z\right) \cdot a \]

      2. lift-*.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \left(b \cdot z\right) \cdot \color{blue}{a} \]

      3. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \color{blue}{\left(b \cdot z\right)} \]

      4. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \left(z \cdot \color{blue}{b}\right) \]

      5. associate-*l* N/A

         \[\leadsto \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot \color{blue}{b} \]

      6. lower-*.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot \color{blue}{b} \]

      7. lower-*.f64 65.6

         \[\leadsto \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \]

   7. Applied rewrites 65.6%

      \[\leadsto \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot \color{blue}{b} \]
3. Recombined 4 regimes into one program.
4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 3: 60.7% accurate, 0.9× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_1 := \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b\\ \mathbf{if}\;a \leq -1.55 \cdot 10^{+200}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(a, t, x\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;a \leq -1.85 \cdot 10^{-15}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_1\\ \mathbf{elif}\;a \leq 2.5 \cdot 10^{+75}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(z, y, x\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;a \leq 3.8 \cdot 10^{+212}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(a, t, x\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_1\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_1 (* (* a z) b)))
   (if (<= a -1.55e+200)
     (fma a t x)
     (if (<= a -1.85e-15)
       t_1
       (if (<= a 2.5e+75) (fma z y x) (if (<= a 3.8e+212) (fma a t x) t_1))))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double t_1 = (a * z) * b;
	double tmp;
	if (a <= -1.55e+200) {
		tmp = fma(a, t, x);
	} else if (a <= -1.85e-15) {
		tmp = t_1;
	} else if (a <= 2.5e+75) {
		tmp = fma(z, y, x);
	} else if (a <= 3.8e+212) {
		tmp = fma(a, t, x);
	} else {
		tmp = t_1;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	t_1 = Float64(Float64(a * z) * b)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (a <= -1.55e+200)
		tmp = fma(a, t, x);
	elseif (a <= -1.85e-15)
		tmp = t_1;
	elseif (a <= 2.5e+75)
		tmp = fma(z, y, x);
	elseif (a <= 3.8e+212)
		tmp = fma(a, t, x);
	else
		tmp = t_1;
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := Block[{t$95$1 = N[(N[(a * z), $MachinePrecision] * b), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[a, -1.55e+200], N[(a * t + x), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[a, -1.85e-15], t$95$1, If[LessEqual[a, 2.5e+75], N[(z * y + x), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[a, 3.8e+212], N[(a * t + x), $MachinePrecision], t$95$1]]]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if a < -1.54999999999999997e200 or 2.5000000000000001e75 < a < 3.79999999999999988e212

   1. Initial program 81.8%

      \[\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in z around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + a \cdot t} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto a \cdot t + \color{blue}{x} \]

      2. lower-fma.f64 69.7

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(a, \color{blue}{t}, x\right) \]

   5. Applied rewrites 69.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(a, t, x\right)} \]

   if -1.54999999999999997e200 < a < -1.85000000000000008e-15 or 3.79999999999999988e212 < a

   1. Initial program 72.1%

      \[\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in b around inf

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(b \cdot z\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \left(b \cdot z\right) \cdot \color{blue}{a} \]

      2. lower-*.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \left(b \cdot z\right) \cdot \color{blue}{a} \]

      3. lower-*.f64 56.7

         \[\leadsto \left(b \cdot z\right) \cdot a \]

   5. Applied rewrites 56.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(b \cdot z\right) \cdot a} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. lift-*.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \left(b \cdot z\right) \cdot a \]

      2. lift-*.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \left(b \cdot z\right) \cdot \color{blue}{a} \]

      3. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \color{blue}{\left(b \cdot z\right)} \]

      4. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \left(z \cdot \color{blue}{b}\right) \]

      5. associate-*l* N/A

         \[\leadsto \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot \color{blue}{b} \]

      6. lower-*.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot \color{blue}{b} \]

      7. lower-*.f64 57.7

         \[\leadsto \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \]

   7. Applied rewrites 57.7%

      \[\leadsto \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot \color{blue}{b} \]

   if -1.85000000000000008e-15 < a < 2.5000000000000001e75

   1. Initial program 98.5%

      \[\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in a around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + y \cdot z} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto y \cdot z + \color{blue}{x} \]

      2. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto z \cdot y + x \]

      3. lower-fma.f64 74.3

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z, \color{blue}{y}, x\right) \]

   5. Applied rewrites 74.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, y, x\right)} \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.
4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 4: 86.7% accurate, 1.2× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;b \leq -3.9 \cdot 10^{+95} \lor \neg \left(b \leq 8.2 \cdot 10^{+67}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(b, z, t\right), a, x\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(a, t, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, y, x\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= b -3.9e+95) (not (<= b 8.2e+67)))
   (fma (fma b z t) a x)
   (fma a t (fma z y x))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if ((b <= -3.9e+95) || !(b <= 8.2e+67)) {
		tmp = fma(fma(b, z, t), a, x);
	} else {
		tmp = fma(a, t, fma(z, y, x));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((b <= -3.9e+95) || !(b <= 8.2e+67))
		tmp = fma(fma(b, z, t), a, x);
	else
		tmp = fma(a, t, fma(z, y, x));
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := If[Or[LessEqual[b, -3.9e+95], N[Not[LessEqual[b, 8.2e+67]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(N[(b * z + t), $MachinePrecision] * a + x), $MachinePrecision], N[(a * t + N[(z * y + x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if b < -3.8999999999999997e95 or 8.19999999999999959e67 < b

   1. Initial program 88.1%

      \[\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in y around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \left(a \cdot t + a \cdot \left(b \cdot z\right)\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. distribute-lft-in N/A

         \[\leadsto x + a \cdot \color{blue}{\left(t + b \cdot z\right)} \]

      2. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \left(t + b \cdot z\right) + \color{blue}{x} \]

      3. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \left(t + b \cdot z\right) \cdot a + x \]

      4. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(t + b \cdot z, \color{blue}{a}, x\right) \]

      5. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(b \cdot z + t, a, x\right) \]

      6. lower-fma.f64 87.5

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(b, z, t\right), a, x\right) \]

   5. Applied rewrites 87.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(b, z, t\right), a, x\right)} \]

   if -3.8999999999999997e95 < b < 8.19999999999999959e67

   1. Initial program 88.0%

      \[\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in b around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \left(a \cdot t + y \cdot z\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto x + \left(y \cdot z + \color{blue}{a \cdot t}\right) \]

      2. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto x + \left(y \cdot z + t \cdot \color{blue}{a}\right) \]

      3. lift-*.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto x + \left(y \cdot z + t \cdot \color{blue}{a}\right) \]

      4. associate-+l+ N/A

         \[\leadsto \left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \color{blue}{t \cdot a} \]

      5. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto t \cdot a + \color{blue}{\left(x + y \cdot z\right)} \]

      6. lift-*.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto t \cdot a + \left(\color{blue}{x} + y \cdot z\right) \]

      7. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto a \cdot t + \left(\color{blue}{x} + y \cdot z\right) \]

      8. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(a, \color{blue}{t}, x + y \cdot z\right) \]

      9. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(a, t, y \cdot z + x\right) \]

      10. *-commutative N/A

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(a, t, z \cdot y + x\right) \]

      11. lower-fma.f64 88.8

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(a, t, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, y, x\right)\right) \]

   5. Applied rewrites 88.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(a, t, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, y, x\right)\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 88.3%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;b \leq -3.9 \cdot 10^{+95} \lor \neg \left(b \leq 8.2 \cdot 10^{+67}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(b, z, t\right), a, x\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(a, t, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, y, x\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 5: 82.6% accurate, 1.2× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;b \leq -9.8 \cdot 10^{+141}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(a \cdot z, b, x\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;b \leq 4.8 \cdot 10^{+134}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(a, t, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, y, x\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, y\right) \cdot z\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= b -9.8e+141)
   (fma (* a z) b x)
   (if (<= b 4.8e+134) (fma a t (fma z y x)) (* (fma b a y) z))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if (b <= -9.8e+141) {
		tmp = fma((a * z), b, x);
	} else if (b <= 4.8e+134) {
		tmp = fma(a, t, fma(z, y, x));
	} else {
		tmp = fma(b, a, y) * z;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (b <= -9.8e+141)
		tmp = fma(Float64(a * z), b, x);
	elseif (b <= 4.8e+134)
		tmp = fma(a, t, fma(z, y, x));
	else
		tmp = Float64(fma(b, a, y) * z);
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := If[LessEqual[b, -9.8e+141], N[(N[(a * z), $MachinePrecision] * b + x), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[b, 4.8e+134], N[(a * t + N[(z * y + x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[(b * a + y), $MachinePrecision] * z), $MachinePrecision]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if b < -9.8000000000000002e141

   1. Initial program 87.7%

      \[\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around inf

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

   5. Applied rewrites 80.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. lift-+.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b} \]

      2. lift-*.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(a \cdot z\right)} \cdot b \]

      3. lift-*.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b} \]

      4. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b + x} \]

      5. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(a \cdot z, b, x\right)} \]

      6. lift-*.f64 80.9

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{a \cdot z}, b, x\right) \]

   7. Applied rewrites 80.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(a \cdot z, b, x\right)} \]

   if -9.8000000000000002e141 < b < 4.80000000000000011e134

   1. Initial program 88.8%

      \[\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in b around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \left(a \cdot t + y \cdot z\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto x + \left(y \cdot z + \color{blue}{a \cdot t}\right) \]

      2. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto x + \left(y \cdot z + t \cdot \color{blue}{a}\right) \]

      3. lift-*.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto x + \left(y \cdot z + t \cdot \color{blue}{a}\right) \]

      4. associate-+l+ N/A

         \[\leadsto \left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \color{blue}{t \cdot a} \]

      5. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto t \cdot a + \color{blue}{\left(x + y \cdot z\right)} \]

      6. lift-*.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto t \cdot a + \left(\color{blue}{x} + y \cdot z\right) \]

      7. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto a \cdot t + \left(\color{blue}{x} + y \cdot z\right) \]

      8. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(a, \color{blue}{t}, x + y \cdot z\right) \]

      9. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(a, t, y \cdot z + x\right) \]

      10. *-commutative N/A

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(a, t, z \cdot y + x\right) \]

      11. lower-fma.f64 88.4

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(a, t, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, y, x\right)\right) \]

   5. Applied rewrites 88.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(a, t, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, y, x\right)\right)} \]

   if 4.80000000000000011e134 < b

   1. Initial program 85.0%

      \[\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in z around inf

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(y + a \cdot b\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \left(y + a \cdot b\right) \cdot \color{blue}{z} \]

      2. lower-*.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \left(y + a \cdot b\right) \cdot \color{blue}{z} \]

      3. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \left(a \cdot b + y\right) \cdot z \]

      4. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \left(b \cdot a + y\right) \cdot z \]

      5. lower-fma.f64 82.1

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, y\right) \cdot z \]

   5. Applied rewrites 82.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, y\right) \cdot z} \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.
4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 6: 74.5% accurate, 1.2× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -8.5 \cdot 10^{+17} \lor \neg \left(z \leq 1.6 \cdot 10^{-68}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, y\right) \cdot z\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(a, t, x\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= z -8.5e+17) (not (<= z 1.6e-68))) (* (fma b a y) z) (fma a t x)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z <= -8.5e+17) || !(z <= 1.6e-68)) {
		tmp = fma(b, a, y) * z;
	} else {
		tmp = fma(a, t, x);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((z <= -8.5e+17) || !(z <= 1.6e-68))
		tmp = Float64(fma(b, a, y) * z);
	else
		tmp = fma(a, t, x);
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := If[Or[LessEqual[z, -8.5e+17], N[Not[LessEqual[z, 1.6e-68]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(N[(b * a + y), $MachinePrecision] * z), $MachinePrecision], N[(a * t + x), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if z < -8.5e17 or 1.5999999999999999e-68 < z

   1. Initial program 81.3%

      \[\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in z around inf

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(y + a \cdot b\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \left(y + a \cdot b\right) \cdot \color{blue}{z} \]

      2. lower-*.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \left(y + a \cdot b\right) \cdot \color{blue}{z} \]

      3. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \left(a \cdot b + y\right) \cdot z \]

      4. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \left(b \cdot a + y\right) \cdot z \]

      5. lower-fma.f64 82.5

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, y\right) \cdot z \]

   5. Applied rewrites 82.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, y\right) \cdot z} \]

   if -8.5e17 < z < 1.5999999999999999e-68

   1. Initial program 98.1%

      \[\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in z around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + a \cdot t} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto a \cdot t + \color{blue}{x} \]

      2. lower-fma.f64 82.6

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(a, \color{blue}{t}, x\right) \]

   5. Applied rewrites 82.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(a, t, x\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 82.5%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -8.5 \cdot 10^{+17} \lor \neg \left(z \leq 1.6 \cdot 10^{-68}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, y\right) \cdot z\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(a, t, x\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 7: 40.1% accurate, 1.2× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -8.5 \cdot 10^{+17}:\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot y\\ \mathbf{elif}\;z \leq 7.5 \cdot 10^{-218}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \mathbf{elif}\;z \leq 1.6 \cdot 10^{-68}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot t\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot y\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= z -8.5e+17)
   (* z y)
   (if (<= z 7.5e-218) x (if (<= z 1.6e-68) (* a t) (* z y)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if (z <= -8.5e+17) {
		tmp = z * y;
	} else if (z <= 7.5e-218) {
		tmp = x;
	} else if (z <= 1.6e-68) {
		tmp = a * t;
	} else {
		tmp = z * y;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

module fmin_fmax_functions
    implicit none
    private
    public fmax
    public fmin

    interface fmax
        module procedure fmax88
        module procedure fmax44
        module procedure fmax84
        module procedure fmax48
    end interface
    interface fmin
        module procedure fmin88
        module procedure fmin44
        module procedure fmin84
        module procedure fmin48
    end interface
contains
    real(8) function fmax88(x, y) result (res)
        real(8), intent (in) :: x
        real(8), intent (in) :: y
        res = merge(y, merge(x, max(x, y), y /= y), x /= x)
    end function
    real(4) function fmax44(x, y) result (res)
        real(4), intent (in) :: x
        real(4), intent (in) :: y
        res = merge(y, merge(x, max(x, y), y /= y), x /= x)
    end function
    real(8) function fmax84(x, y) result(res)
        real(8), intent (in) :: x
        real(4), intent (in) :: y
        res = merge(dble(y), merge(x, max(x, dble(y)), y /= y), x /= x)
    end function
    real(8) function fmax48(x, y) result(res)
        real(4), intent (in) :: x
        real(8), intent (in) :: y
        res = merge(y, merge(dble(x), max(dble(x), y), y /= y), x /= x)
    end function
    real(8) function fmin88(x, y) result (res)
        real(8), intent (in) :: x
        real(8), intent (in) :: y
        res = merge(y, merge(x, min(x, y), y /= y), x /= x)
    end function
    real(4) function fmin44(x, y) result (res)
        real(4), intent (in) :: x
        real(4), intent (in) :: y
        res = merge(y, merge(x, min(x, y), y /= y), x /= x)
    end function
    real(8) function fmin84(x, y) result(res)
        real(8), intent (in) :: x
        real(4), intent (in) :: y
        res = merge(dble(y), merge(x, min(x, dble(y)), y /= y), x /= x)
    end function
    real(8) function fmin48(x, y) result(res)
        real(4), intent (in) :: x
        real(8), intent (in) :: y
        res = merge(y, merge(dble(x), min(dble(x), y), y /= y), x /= x)
    end function
end module

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
use fmin_fmax_functions
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (z <= (-8.5d+17)) then
        tmp = z * y
    else if (z <= 7.5d-218) then
        tmp = x
    else if (z <= 1.6d-68) then
        tmp = a * t
    else
        tmp = z * y
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if (z <= -8.5e+17) {
		tmp = z * y;
	} else if (z <= 7.5e-218) {
		tmp = x;
	} else if (z <= 1.6e-68) {
		tmp = a * t;
	} else {
		tmp = z * y;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b):
	tmp = 0
	if z <= -8.5e+17:
		tmp = z * y
	elif z <= 7.5e-218:
		tmp = x
	elif z <= 1.6e-68:
		tmp = a * t
	else:
		tmp = z * y
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (z <= -8.5e+17)
		tmp = Float64(z * y);
	elseif (z <= 7.5e-218)
		tmp = x;
	elseif (z <= 1.6e-68)
		tmp = Float64(a * t);
	else
		tmp = Float64(z * y);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (z <= -8.5e+17)
		tmp = z * y;
	elseif (z <= 7.5e-218)
		tmp = x;
	elseif (z <= 1.6e-68)
		tmp = a * t;
	else
		tmp = z * y;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := If[LessEqual[z, -8.5e+17], N[(z * y), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[z, 7.5e-218], x, If[LessEqual[z, 1.6e-68], N[(a * t), $MachinePrecision], N[(z * y), $MachinePrecision]]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if z < -8.5e17 or 1.5999999999999999e-68 < z

   1. Initial program 81.3%

      \[\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in y around inf

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot z} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto z \cdot \color{blue}{y} \]

      2. lower-*.f64 44.9

         \[\leadsto z \cdot \color{blue}{y} \]

   5. Applied rewrites 44.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot y} \]

   if -8.5e17 < z < 7.50000000000000011e-218

   1. Initial program 98.6%

      \[\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around inf

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

   5. Applied rewrites 47.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} \]

   if 7.50000000000000011e-218 < z < 1.5999999999999999e-68

   1. Initial program 97.0%

      \[\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in t around inf

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot t} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. lower-*.f64 47.8

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \color{blue}{t} \]

   5. Applied rewrites 47.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot t} \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.
4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 8: 64.0% accurate, 1.6× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -2.3 \cdot 10^{-45} \lor \neg \left(z \leq 2.2 \cdot 10^{-69}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(z, y, x\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(a, t, x\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= z -2.3e-45) (not (<= z 2.2e-69))) (fma z y x) (fma a t x)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z <= -2.3e-45) || !(z <= 2.2e-69)) {
		tmp = fma(z, y, x);
	} else {
		tmp = fma(a, t, x);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((z <= -2.3e-45) || !(z <= 2.2e-69))
		tmp = fma(z, y, x);
	else
		tmp = fma(a, t, x);
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := If[Or[LessEqual[z, -2.3e-45], N[Not[LessEqual[z, 2.2e-69]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(z * y + x), $MachinePrecision], N[(a * t + x), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if z < -2.29999999999999992e-45 or 2.2e-69 < z

   1. Initial program 81.9%

      \[\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in a around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + y \cdot z} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto y \cdot z + \color{blue}{x} \]

      2. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto z \cdot y + x \]

      3. lower-fma.f64 53.9

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z, \color{blue}{y}, x\right) \]

   5. Applied rewrites 53.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, y, x\right)} \]

   if -2.29999999999999992e-45 < z < 2.2e-69

   1. Initial program 98.9%

      \[\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in z around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + a \cdot t} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto a \cdot t + \color{blue}{x} \]

      2. lower-fma.f64 84.8

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(a, \color{blue}{t}, x\right) \]

   5. Applied rewrites 84.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(a, t, x\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 65.1%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -2.3 \cdot 10^{-45} \lor \neg \left(z \leq 2.2 \cdot 10^{-69}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(z, y, x\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(a, t, x\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 9: 58.7% accurate, 1.6× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -2.6 \cdot 10^{+96} \lor \neg \left(z \leq 1.05 \cdot 10^{-26}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot y\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(a, t, x\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= z -2.6e+96) (not (<= z 1.05e-26))) (* z y) (fma a t x)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z <= -2.6e+96) || !(z <= 1.05e-26)) {
		tmp = z * y;
	} else {
		tmp = fma(a, t, x);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((z <= -2.6e+96) || !(z <= 1.05e-26))
		tmp = Float64(z * y);
	else
		tmp = fma(a, t, x);
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := If[Or[LessEqual[z, -2.6e+96], N[Not[LessEqual[z, 1.05e-26]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(z * y), $MachinePrecision], N[(a * t + x), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if z < -2.6e96 or 1.05000000000000004e-26 < z

   1. Initial program 77.9%

      \[\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in y around inf

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot z} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto z \cdot \color{blue}{y} \]

      2. lower-*.f64 48.8

         \[\leadsto z \cdot \color{blue}{y} \]

   5. Applied rewrites 48.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot y} \]

   if -2.6e96 < z < 1.05000000000000004e-26

   1. Initial program 97.1%

      \[\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in z around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + a \cdot t} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto a \cdot t + \color{blue}{x} \]

      2. lower-fma.f64 70.6

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(a, \color{blue}{t}, x\right) \]

   5. Applied rewrites 70.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(a, t, x\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 60.3%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -2.6 \cdot 10^{+96} \lor \neg \left(z \leq 1.05 \cdot 10^{-26}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot y\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(a, t, x\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 10: 39.3% accurate, 1.7× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;a \leq -2.25 \cdot 10^{-48} \lor \neg \left(a \leq 1.18 \cdot 10^{-60}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot t\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= a -2.25e-48) (not (<= a 1.18e-60))) (* a t) x))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if ((a <= -2.25e-48) || !(a <= 1.18e-60)) {
		tmp = a * t;
	} else {
		tmp = x;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

module fmin_fmax_functions
    implicit none
    private
    public fmax
    public fmin

    interface fmax
        module procedure fmax88
        module procedure fmax44
        module procedure fmax84
        module procedure fmax48
    end interface
    interface fmin
        module procedure fmin88
        module procedure fmin44
        module procedure fmin84
        module procedure fmin48
    end interface
contains
    real(8) function fmax88(x, y) result (res)
        real(8), intent (in) :: x
        real(8), intent (in) :: y
        res = merge(y, merge(x, max(x, y), y /= y), x /= x)
    end function
    real(4) function fmax44(x, y) result (res)
        real(4), intent (in) :: x
        real(4), intent (in) :: y
        res = merge(y, merge(x, max(x, y), y /= y), x /= x)
    end function
    real(8) function fmax84(x, y) result(res)
        real(8), intent (in) :: x
        real(4), intent (in) :: y
        res = merge(dble(y), merge(x, max(x, dble(y)), y /= y), x /= x)
    end function
    real(8) function fmax48(x, y) result(res)
        real(4), intent (in) :: x
        real(8), intent (in) :: y
        res = merge(y, merge(dble(x), max(dble(x), y), y /= y), x /= x)
    end function
    real(8) function fmin88(x, y) result (res)
        real(8), intent (in) :: x
        real(8), intent (in) :: y
        res = merge(y, merge(x, min(x, y), y /= y), x /= x)
    end function
    real(4) function fmin44(x, y) result (res)
        real(4), intent (in) :: x
        real(4), intent (in) :: y
        res = merge(y, merge(x, min(x, y), y /= y), x /= x)
    end function
    real(8) function fmin84(x, y) result(res)
        real(8), intent (in) :: x
        real(4), intent (in) :: y
        res = merge(dble(y), merge(x, min(x, dble(y)), y /= y), x /= x)
    end function
    real(8) function fmin48(x, y) result(res)
        real(4), intent (in) :: x
        real(8), intent (in) :: y
        res = merge(y, merge(dble(x), min(dble(x), y), y /= y), x /= x)
    end function
end module

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
use fmin_fmax_functions
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((a <= (-2.25d-48)) .or. (.not. (a <= 1.18d-60))) then
        tmp = a * t
    else
        tmp = x
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if ((a <= -2.25e-48) || !(a <= 1.18e-60)) {
		tmp = a * t;
	} else {
		tmp = x;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b):
	tmp = 0
	if (a <= -2.25e-48) or not (a <= 1.18e-60):
		tmp = a * t
	else:
		tmp = x
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((a <= -2.25e-48) || !(a <= 1.18e-60))
		tmp = Float64(a * t);
	else
		tmp = x;
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((a <= -2.25e-48) || ~((a <= 1.18e-60)))
		tmp = a * t;
	else
		tmp = x;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := If[Or[LessEqual[a, -2.25e-48], N[Not[LessEqual[a, 1.18e-60]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(a * t), $MachinePrecision], x]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if a < -2.24999999999999994e-48 or 1.17999999999999994e-60 < a

   1. Initial program 81.1%

      \[\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in t around inf

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot t} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. lower-*.f64 39.9

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \color{blue}{t} \]

   5. Applied rewrites 39.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot t} \]

   if -2.24999999999999994e-48 < a < 1.17999999999999994e-60

   1. Initial program 98.1%

      \[\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around inf

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

   5. Applied rewrites 39.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 39.7%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;a \leq -2.25 \cdot 10^{-48} \lor \neg \left(a \leq 1.18 \cdot 10^{-60}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot t\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 11: 26.9% accurate, 30.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b) :precision binary64 x)

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	return x;
}

Fortran

module fmin_fmax_functions
    implicit none
    private
    public fmax
    public fmin

    interface fmax
        module procedure fmax88
        module procedure fmax44
        module procedure fmax84
        module procedure fmax48
    end interface
    interface fmin
        module procedure fmin88
        module procedure fmin44
        module procedure fmin84
        module procedure fmin48
    end interface
contains
    real(8) function fmax88(x, y) result (res)
        real(8), intent (in) :: x
        real(8), intent (in) :: y
        res = merge(y, merge(x, max(x, y), y /= y), x /= x)
    end function
    real(4) function fmax44(x, y) result (res)
        real(4), intent (in) :: x
        real(4), intent (in) :: y
        res = merge(y, merge(x, max(x, y), y /= y), x /= x)
    end function
    real(8) function fmax84(x, y) result(res)
        real(8), intent (in) :: x
        real(4), intent (in) :: y
        res = merge(dble(y), merge(x, max(x, dble(y)), y /= y), x /= x)
    end function
    real(8) function fmax48(x, y) result(res)
        real(4), intent (in) :: x
        real(8), intent (in) :: y
        res = merge(y, merge(dble(x), max(dble(x), y), y /= y), x /= x)
    end function
    real(8) function fmin88(x, y) result (res)
        real(8), intent (in) :: x
        real(8), intent (in) :: y
        res = merge(y, merge(x, min(x, y), y /= y), x /= x)
    end function
    real(4) function fmin44(x, y) result (res)
        real(4), intent (in) :: x
        real(4), intent (in) :: y
        res = merge(y, merge(x, min(x, y), y /= y), x /= x)
    end function
    real(8) function fmin84(x, y) result(res)
        real(8), intent (in) :: x
        real(4), intent (in) :: y
        res = merge(dble(y), merge(x, min(x, dble(y)), y /= y), x /= x)
    end function
    real(8) function fmin48(x, y) result(res)
        real(4), intent (in) :: x
        real(8), intent (in) :: y
        res = merge(y, merge(dble(x), min(dble(x), y), y /= y), x /= x)
    end function
end module

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
use fmin_fmax_functions
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    code = x
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	return x;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b):
	return x

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	return x
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = x;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := x

Derivation

1. Initial program 88.1%

   \[\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \]
2. Add Preprocessing

3. Taylor expanded in x around inf

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} \]
4. Step-by-step derivation

5. Applied rewrites 23.3%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} \]
6. Add Preprocessing

Developer Target 1: 97.2% accurate, 0.8× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_1 := z \cdot \left(b \cdot a + y\right) + \left(x + t \cdot a\right)\\ \mathbf{if}\;z < -11820553527347888000:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_1\\ \mathbf{elif}\;z < 4.7589743188364287 \cdot 10^{-122}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(b \cdot z + t\right) \cdot a + \left(z \cdot y + x\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_1\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_1 (+ (* z (+ (* b a) y)) (+ x (* t a)))))
   (if (< z -11820553527347888000.0)
     t_1
     (if (< z 4.7589743188364287e-122)
       (+ (* (+ (* b z) t) a) (+ (* z y) x))
       t_1))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double t_1 = (z * ((b * a) + y)) + (x + (t * a));
	double tmp;
	if (z < -11820553527347888000.0) {
		tmp = t_1;
	} else if (z < 4.7589743188364287e-122) {
		tmp = (((b * z) + t) * a) + ((z * y) + x);
	} else {
		tmp = t_1;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

module fmin_fmax_functions
    implicit none
    private
    public fmax
    public fmin

    interface fmax
        module procedure fmax88
        module procedure fmax44
        module procedure fmax84
        module procedure fmax48
    end interface
    interface fmin
        module procedure fmin88
        module procedure fmin44
        module procedure fmin84
        module procedure fmin48
    end interface
contains
    real(8) function fmax88(x, y) result (res)
        real(8), intent (in) :: x
        real(8), intent (in) :: y
        res = merge(y, merge(x, max(x, y), y /= y), x /= x)
    end function
    real(4) function fmax44(x, y) result (res)
        real(4), intent (in) :: x
        real(4), intent (in) :: y
        res = merge(y, merge(x, max(x, y), y /= y), x /= x)
    end function
    real(8) function fmax84(x, y) result(res)
        real(8), intent (in) :: x
        real(4), intent (in) :: y
        res = merge(dble(y), merge(x, max(x, dble(y)), y /= y), x /= x)
    end function
    real(8) function fmax48(x, y) result(res)
        real(4), intent (in) :: x
        real(8), intent (in) :: y
        res = merge(y, merge(dble(x), max(dble(x), y), y /= y), x /= x)
    end function
    real(8) function fmin88(x, y) result (res)
        real(8), intent (in) :: x
        real(8), intent (in) :: y
        res = merge(y, merge(x, min(x, y), y /= y), x /= x)
    end function
    real(4) function fmin44(x, y) result (res)
        real(4), intent (in) :: x
        real(4), intent (in) :: y
        res = merge(y, merge(x, min(x, y), y /= y), x /= x)
    end function
    real(8) function fmin84(x, y) result(res)
        real(8), intent (in) :: x
        real(4), intent (in) :: y
        res = merge(dble(y), merge(x, min(x, dble(y)), y /= y), x /= x)
    end function
    real(8) function fmin48(x, y) result(res)
        real(4), intent (in) :: x
        real(8), intent (in) :: y
        res = merge(y, merge(dble(x), min(dble(x), y), y /= y), x /= x)
    end function
end module

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
use fmin_fmax_functions
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8) :: t_1
    real(8) :: tmp
    t_1 = (z * ((b * a) + y)) + (x + (t * a))
    if (z < (-11820553527347888000.0d0)) then
        tmp = t_1
    else if (z < 4.7589743188364287d-122) then
        tmp = (((b * z) + t) * a) + ((z * y) + x)
    else
        tmp = t_1
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double t_1 = (z * ((b * a) + y)) + (x + (t * a));
	double tmp;
	if (z < -11820553527347888000.0) {
		tmp = t_1;
	} else if (z < 4.7589743188364287e-122) {
		tmp = (((b * z) + t) * a) + ((z * y) + x);
	} else {
		tmp = t_1;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b):
	t_1 = (z * ((b * a) + y)) + (x + (t * a))
	tmp = 0
	if z < -11820553527347888000.0:
		tmp = t_1
	elif z < 4.7589743188364287e-122:
		tmp = (((b * z) + t) * a) + ((z * y) + x)
	else:
		tmp = t_1
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	t_1 = Float64(Float64(z * Float64(Float64(b * a) + y)) + Float64(x + Float64(t * a)))
	tmp = 0.0
	if (z < -11820553527347888000.0)
		tmp = t_1;
	elseif (z < 4.7589743188364287e-122)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(b * z) + t) * a) + Float64(Float64(z * y) + x));
	else
		tmp = t_1;
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	t_1 = (z * ((b * a) + y)) + (x + (t * a));
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (z < -11820553527347888000.0)
		tmp = t_1;
	elseif (z < 4.7589743188364287e-122)
		tmp = (((b * z) + t) * a) + ((z * y) + x);
	else
		tmp = t_1;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := Block[{t$95$1 = N[(N[(z * N[(N[(b * a), $MachinePrecision] + y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(x + N[(t * a), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, If[Less[z, -11820553527347888000.0], t$95$1, If[Less[z, 4.7589743188364287e-122], N[(N[(N[(N[(b * z), $MachinePrecision] + t), $MachinePrecision] * a), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(z * y), $MachinePrecision] + x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], t$95$1]]]

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2025079 
(FPCore (x y z t a b)
  :name "Graphics.Rasterific.CubicBezier:cachedBezierAt from Rasterific-0.6.1"
  :precision binary64

  :alt
  (! :herbie-platform default (if (< z -11820553527347888000) (+ (* z (+ (* b a) y)) (+ x (* t a))) (if (< z 47589743188364287/1000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000) (+ (* (+ (* b z) t) a) (+ (* z y) x)) (+ (* z (+ (* b a) y)) (+ x (* t a))))))

  (+ (+ (+ x (* y z)) (* t a)) (* (* a z) b)))