Jmat.Real.lambertw, newton loop step

Percentage Accurate: 77.9% → 97.5%
Time: 17.0s
Alternatives: 3
Speedup: N/A×

Specification

?
\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_0 := wj \cdot e^{wj}\\ wj - \frac{t\_0 - x}{e^{wj} + t\_0} \end{array} \end{array} \]
(FPCore (wj x)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_0 (* wj (exp wj)))) (- wj (/ (- t_0 x) (+ (exp wj) t_0)))))
double code(double wj, double x) {
	double t_0 = wj * exp(wj);
	return wj - ((t_0 - x) / (exp(wj) + t_0));
}
module fmin_fmax_functions
    implicit none
    private
    public fmax
    public fmin

    interface fmax
        module procedure fmax88
        module procedure fmax44
        module procedure fmax84
        module procedure fmax48
    end interface
    interface fmin
        module procedure fmin88
        module procedure fmin44
        module procedure fmin84
        module procedure fmin48
    end interface
contains
    real(8) function fmax88(x, y) result (res)
        real(8), intent (in) :: x
        real(8), intent (in) :: y
        res = merge(y, merge(x, max(x, y), y /= y), x /= x)
    end function
    real(4) function fmax44(x, y) result (res)
        real(4), intent (in) :: x
        real(4), intent (in) :: y
        res = merge(y, merge(x, max(x, y), y /= y), x /= x)
    end function
    real(8) function fmax84(x, y) result(res)
        real(8), intent (in) :: x
        real(4), intent (in) :: y
        res = merge(dble(y), merge(x, max(x, dble(y)), y /= y), x /= x)
    end function
    real(8) function fmax48(x, y) result(res)
        real(4), intent (in) :: x
        real(8), intent (in) :: y
        res = merge(y, merge(dble(x), max(dble(x), y), y /= y), x /= x)
    end function
    real(8) function fmin88(x, y) result (res)
        real(8), intent (in) :: x
        real(8), intent (in) :: y
        res = merge(y, merge(x, min(x, y), y /= y), x /= x)
    end function
    real(4) function fmin44(x, y) result (res)
        real(4), intent (in) :: x
        real(4), intent (in) :: y
        res = merge(y, merge(x, min(x, y), y /= y), x /= x)
    end function
    real(8) function fmin84(x, y) result(res)
        real(8), intent (in) :: x
        real(4), intent (in) :: y
        res = merge(dble(y), merge(x, min(x, dble(y)), y /= y), x /= x)
    end function
    real(8) function fmin48(x, y) result(res)
        real(4), intent (in) :: x
        real(8), intent (in) :: y
        res = merge(y, merge(dble(x), min(dble(x), y), y /= y), x /= x)
    end function
end module

real(8) function code(wj, x)
use fmin_fmax_functions
    real(8), intent (in) :: wj
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8) :: t_0
    t_0 = wj * exp(wj)
    code = wj - ((t_0 - x) / (exp(wj) + t_0))
end function
public static double code(double wj, double x) {
	double t_0 = wj * Math.exp(wj);
	return wj - ((t_0 - x) / (Math.exp(wj) + t_0));
}
def code(wj, x):
	t_0 = wj * math.exp(wj)
	return wj - ((t_0 - x) / (math.exp(wj) + t_0))
function code(wj, x)
	t_0 = Float64(wj * exp(wj))
	return Float64(wj - Float64(Float64(t_0 - x) / Float64(exp(wj) + t_0)))
end
function tmp = code(wj, x)
	t_0 = wj * exp(wj);
	tmp = wj - ((t_0 - x) / (exp(wj) + t_0));
end
code[wj_, x_] := Block[{t$95$0 = N[(wj * N[Exp[wj], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, N[(wj - N[(N[(t$95$0 - x), $MachinePrecision] / N[(N[Exp[wj], $MachinePrecision] + t$95$0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\begin{array}{l}
t_0 := wj \cdot e^{wj}\\
wj - \frac{t\_0 - x}{e^{wj} + t\_0}
\end{array}
\end{array}

Sampling outcomes in binary64 precision:

Local Percentage Accuracy vs ?

The average percentage accuracy by input value. Horizontal axis shows value of an input variable; the variable is choosen in the title. Vertical axis is accuracy; higher is better. Red represent the original program, while blue represents Herbie's suggestion. These can be toggled with buttons below the plot. The line is an average while dots represent individual samples.

Accuracy vs Speed?

Herbie found 3 alternatives:

AlternativeAccuracySpeedup
The accuracy (vertical axis) and speed (horizontal axis) of each alternatives. Up and to the right is better. The red square shows the initial program, and each blue circle shows an alternative.The line shows the best available speed-accuracy tradeoffs.

Initial Program: 77.9% accurate, 1.0× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_0 := wj \cdot e^{wj}\\ wj - \frac{t\_0 - x}{e^{wj} + t\_0} \end{array} \end{array} \]
(FPCore (wj x)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_0 (* wj (exp wj)))) (- wj (/ (- t_0 x) (+ (exp wj) t_0)))))
double code(double wj, double x) {
	double t_0 = wj * exp(wj);
	return wj - ((t_0 - x) / (exp(wj) + t_0));
}
module fmin_fmax_functions
    implicit none
    private
    public fmax
    public fmin

    interface fmax
        module procedure fmax88
        module procedure fmax44
        module procedure fmax84
        module procedure fmax48
    end interface
    interface fmin
        module procedure fmin88
        module procedure fmin44
        module procedure fmin84
        module procedure fmin48
    end interface
contains
    real(8) function fmax88(x, y) result (res)
        real(8), intent (in) :: x
        real(8), intent (in) :: y
        res = merge(y, merge(x, max(x, y), y /= y), x /= x)
    end function
    real(4) function fmax44(x, y) result (res)
        real(4), intent (in) :: x
        real(4), intent (in) :: y
        res = merge(y, merge(x, max(x, y), y /= y), x /= x)
    end function
    real(8) function fmax84(x, y) result(res)
        real(8), intent (in) :: x
        real(4), intent (in) :: y
        res = merge(dble(y), merge(x, max(x, dble(y)), y /= y), x /= x)
    end function
    real(8) function fmax48(x, y) result(res)
        real(4), intent (in) :: x
        real(8), intent (in) :: y
        res = merge(y, merge(dble(x), max(dble(x), y), y /= y), x /= x)
    end function
    real(8) function fmin88(x, y) result (res)
        real(8), intent (in) :: x
        real(8), intent (in) :: y
        res = merge(y, merge(x, min(x, y), y /= y), x /= x)
    end function
    real(4) function fmin44(x, y) result (res)
        real(4), intent (in) :: x
        real(4), intent (in) :: y
        res = merge(y, merge(x, min(x, y), y /= y), x /= x)
    end function
    real(8) function fmin84(x, y) result(res)
        real(8), intent (in) :: x
        real(4), intent (in) :: y
        res = merge(dble(y), merge(x, min(x, dble(y)), y /= y), x /= x)
    end function
    real(8) function fmin48(x, y) result(res)
        real(4), intent (in) :: x
        real(8), intent (in) :: y
        res = merge(y, merge(dble(x), min(dble(x), y), y /= y), x /= x)
    end function
end module

real(8) function code(wj, x)
use fmin_fmax_functions
    real(8), intent (in) :: wj
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8) :: t_0
    t_0 = wj * exp(wj)
    code = wj - ((t_0 - x) / (exp(wj) + t_0))
end function
public static double code(double wj, double x) {
	double t_0 = wj * Math.exp(wj);
	return wj - ((t_0 - x) / (Math.exp(wj) + t_0));
}
def code(wj, x):
	t_0 = wj * math.exp(wj)
	return wj - ((t_0 - x) / (math.exp(wj) + t_0))
function code(wj, x)
	t_0 = Float64(wj * exp(wj))
	return Float64(wj - Float64(Float64(t_0 - x) / Float64(exp(wj) + t_0)))
end
function tmp = code(wj, x)
	t_0 = wj * exp(wj);
	tmp = wj - ((t_0 - x) / (exp(wj) + t_0));
end
code[wj_, x_] := Block[{t$95$0 = N[(wj * N[Exp[wj], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, N[(wj - N[(N[(t$95$0 - x), $MachinePrecision] / N[(N[Exp[wj], $MachinePrecision] + t$95$0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\begin{array}{l}
t_0 := wj \cdot e^{wj}\\
wj - \frac{t\_0 - x}{e^{wj} + t\_0}
\end{array}
\end{array}

Alternative 1: 97.5% accurate, N/A× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_0 := \frac{x}{e^{wj}}\\ t_1 := t\_0 - -1\\ \mathbf{if}\;wj \leq 0.65:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(-3, x, \mathsf{fma}\left(0.6666666666666666, x, \left(x \cdot -2.5\right) \cdot -2\right)\right) - -1\right) \cdot wj, -1, 1\right) - x \cdot -2.5, wj, -2 \cdot x\right), wj, x\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;wj - \mathsf{fma}\left(\frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(\frac{\frac{t\_1}{wj} - t\_1}{-wj}, -1, t\_0\right) - -1}{wj}, -1, 1\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]
(FPCore (wj x)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_0 (/ x (exp wj))) (t_1 (- t_0 -1.0)))
   (if (<= wj 0.65)
     (fma
      (fma
       (-
        (fma
         (*
          (- (fma -3.0 x (fma 0.6666666666666666 x (* (* x -2.5) -2.0))) -1.0)
          wj)
         -1.0
         1.0)
        (* x -2.5))
       wj
       (* -2.0 x))
      wj
      x)
     (-
      wj
      (fma
       (/ (- (fma (/ (- (/ t_1 wj) t_1) (- wj)) -1.0 t_0) -1.0) wj)
       -1.0
       1.0)))))
double code(double wj, double x) {
	double t_0 = x / exp(wj);
	double t_1 = t_0 - -1.0;
	double tmp;
	if (wj <= 0.65) {
		tmp = fma(fma((fma(((fma(-3.0, x, fma(0.6666666666666666, x, ((x * -2.5) * -2.0))) - -1.0) * wj), -1.0, 1.0) - (x * -2.5)), wj, (-2.0 * x)), wj, x);
	} else {
		tmp = wj - fma(((fma((((t_1 / wj) - t_1) / -wj), -1.0, t_0) - -1.0) / wj), -1.0, 1.0);
	}
	return tmp;
}
function code(wj, x)
	t_0 = Float64(x / exp(wj))
	t_1 = Float64(t_0 - -1.0)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (wj <= 0.65)
		tmp = fma(fma(Float64(fma(Float64(Float64(fma(-3.0, x, fma(0.6666666666666666, x, Float64(Float64(x * -2.5) * -2.0))) - -1.0) * wj), -1.0, 1.0) - Float64(x * -2.5)), wj, Float64(-2.0 * x)), wj, x);
	else
		tmp = Float64(wj - fma(Float64(Float64(fma(Float64(Float64(Float64(t_1 / wj) - t_1) / Float64(-wj)), -1.0, t_0) - -1.0) / wj), -1.0, 1.0));
	end
	return tmp
end
code[wj_, x_] := Block[{t$95$0 = N[(x / N[Exp[wj], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, Block[{t$95$1 = N[(t$95$0 - -1.0), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[wj, 0.65], N[(N[(N[(N[(N[(N[(N[(-3.0 * x + N[(0.6666666666666666 * x + N[(N[(x * -2.5), $MachinePrecision] * -2.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - -1.0), $MachinePrecision] * wj), $MachinePrecision] * -1.0 + 1.0), $MachinePrecision] - N[(x * -2.5), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] * wj + N[(-2.0 * x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] * wj + x), $MachinePrecision], N[(wj - N[(N[(N[(N[(N[(N[(N[(t$95$1 / wj), $MachinePrecision] - t$95$1), $MachinePrecision] / (-wj)), $MachinePrecision] * -1.0 + t$95$0), $MachinePrecision] - -1.0), $MachinePrecision] / wj), $MachinePrecision] * -1.0 + 1.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]]]
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\begin{array}{l}
t_0 := \frac{x}{e^{wj}}\\
t_1 := t\_0 - -1\\
\mathbf{if}\;wj \leq 0.65:\\
\;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(-3, x, \mathsf{fma}\left(0.6666666666666666, x, \left(x \cdot -2.5\right) \cdot -2\right)\right) - -1\right) \cdot wj, -1, 1\right) - x \cdot -2.5, wj, -2 \cdot x\right), wj, x\right)\\

\mathbf{else}:\\
\;\;\;\;wj - \mathsf{fma}\left(\frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(\frac{\frac{t\_1}{wj} - t\_1}{-wj}, -1, t\_0\right) - -1}{wj}, -1, 1\right)\\


\end{array}
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Split input into 2 regimes
  2. if wj < 0.650000000000000022

    1. Initial program 75.4%

      \[wj - \frac{wj \cdot e^{wj} - x}{e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}} \]
    2. Add Preprocessing
    3. Taylor expanded in wj around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + wj \cdot \left(wj \cdot \left(\left(1 + -1 \cdot \left(wj \cdot \left(1 + \left(-3 \cdot x + \left(-2 \cdot \left(-4 \cdot x + \frac{3}{2} \cdot x\right) + \frac{2}{3} \cdot x\right)\right)\right)\right)\right) - \left(-4 \cdot x + \frac{3}{2} \cdot x\right)\right) - 2 \cdot x\right)} \]
    4. Step-by-step derivation
      1. +-commutativeN/A

        \[\leadsto wj \cdot \left(wj \cdot \left(\left(1 + -1 \cdot \left(wj \cdot \left(1 + \left(-3 \cdot x + \left(-2 \cdot \left(-4 \cdot x + \frac{3}{2} \cdot x\right) + \frac{2}{3} \cdot x\right)\right)\right)\right)\right) - \left(-4 \cdot x + \frac{3}{2} \cdot x\right)\right) - 2 \cdot x\right) + \color{blue}{x} \]
      2. *-commutativeN/A

        \[\leadsto \left(wj \cdot \left(\left(1 + -1 \cdot \left(wj \cdot \left(1 + \left(-3 \cdot x + \left(-2 \cdot \left(-4 \cdot x + \frac{3}{2} \cdot x\right) + \frac{2}{3} \cdot x\right)\right)\right)\right)\right) - \left(-4 \cdot x + \frac{3}{2} \cdot x\right)\right) - 2 \cdot x\right) \cdot wj + x \]
      3. lower-fma.f64N/A

        \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(wj \cdot \left(\left(1 + -1 \cdot \left(wj \cdot \left(1 + \left(-3 \cdot x + \left(-2 \cdot \left(-4 \cdot x + \frac{3}{2} \cdot x\right) + \frac{2}{3} \cdot x\right)\right)\right)\right)\right) - \left(-4 \cdot x + \frac{3}{2} \cdot x\right)\right) - 2 \cdot x, \color{blue}{wj}, x\right) \]
    5. Applied rewrites99.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(-3, x, \mathsf{fma}\left(0.6666666666666666, x, \left(x \cdot -2.5\right) \cdot -2\right)\right) + 1\right) \cdot wj, -1, 1\right) - x \cdot -2.5, wj, -2 \cdot x\right), wj, x\right)} \]

    if 0.650000000000000022 < wj

    1. Initial program 33.3%

      \[wj - \frac{wj \cdot e^{wj} - x}{e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}} \]
    2. Add Preprocessing
    3. Taylor expanded in wj around -inf

      \[\leadsto wj - \color{blue}{\left(1 + -1 \cdot \frac{1 + \left(-1 \cdot \frac{-1 \cdot \frac{1 + \frac{x}{e^{wj}}}{wj} - -1 \cdot \left(1 + \frac{x}{e^{wj}}\right)}{wj} + \frac{x}{e^{wj}}\right)}{wj}\right)} \]
    4. Step-by-step derivation
      1. +-commutativeN/A

        \[\leadsto wj - \left(-1 \cdot \frac{1 + \left(-1 \cdot \frac{-1 \cdot \frac{1 + \frac{x}{e^{wj}}}{wj} - -1 \cdot \left(1 + \frac{x}{e^{wj}}\right)}{wj} + \frac{x}{e^{wj}}\right)}{wj} + \color{blue}{1}\right) \]
      2. *-commutativeN/A

        \[\leadsto wj - \left(\frac{1 + \left(-1 \cdot \frac{-1 \cdot \frac{1 + \frac{x}{e^{wj}}}{wj} - -1 \cdot \left(1 + \frac{x}{e^{wj}}\right)}{wj} + \frac{x}{e^{wj}}\right)}{wj} \cdot -1 + 1\right) \]
      3. lower-fma.f64N/A

        \[\leadsto wj - \mathsf{fma}\left(\frac{1 + \left(-1 \cdot \frac{-1 \cdot \frac{1 + \frac{x}{e^{wj}}}{wj} - -1 \cdot \left(1 + \frac{x}{e^{wj}}\right)}{wj} + \frac{x}{e^{wj}}\right)}{wj}, \color{blue}{-1}, 1\right) \]
    5. Applied rewrites80.8%

      \[\leadsto wj - \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(\frac{\left(-\frac{\frac{x}{e^{wj}} + 1}{wj}\right) - \left(-\left(\frac{x}{e^{wj}} + 1\right)\right)}{wj}, -1, \frac{x}{e^{wj}}\right) + 1}{wj}, -1, 1\right)} \]
  3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
  4. Final simplification98.6%

    \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;wj \leq 0.65:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(-3, x, \mathsf{fma}\left(0.6666666666666666, x, \left(x \cdot -2.5\right) \cdot -2\right)\right) - -1\right) \cdot wj, -1, 1\right) - x \cdot -2.5, wj, -2 \cdot x\right), wj, x\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;wj - \mathsf{fma}\left(\frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(\frac{\frac{\frac{x}{e^{wj}} - -1}{wj} - \left(\frac{x}{e^{wj}} - -1\right)}{-wj}, -1, \frac{x}{e^{wj}}\right) - -1}{wj}, -1, 1\right)\\ \end{array} \]
  5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 2: 96.4% accurate, N/A× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(-3, x, \mathsf{fma}\left(0.6666666666666666, x, \left(x \cdot -2.5\right) \cdot -2\right)\right) - -1\right) \cdot wj, -1, 1\right) - x \cdot -2.5, wj, -2 \cdot x\right), wj, x\right) \end{array} \]
(FPCore (wj x)
 :precision binary64
 (fma
  (fma
   (-
    (fma
     (*
      (- (fma -3.0 x (fma 0.6666666666666666 x (* (* x -2.5) -2.0))) -1.0)
      wj)
     -1.0
     1.0)
    (* x -2.5))
   wj
   (* -2.0 x))
  wj
  x))
double code(double wj, double x) {
	return fma(fma((fma(((fma(-3.0, x, fma(0.6666666666666666, x, ((x * -2.5) * -2.0))) - -1.0) * wj), -1.0, 1.0) - (x * -2.5)), wj, (-2.0 * x)), wj, x);
}
function code(wj, x)
	return fma(fma(Float64(fma(Float64(Float64(fma(-3.0, x, fma(0.6666666666666666, x, Float64(Float64(x * -2.5) * -2.0))) - -1.0) * wj), -1.0, 1.0) - Float64(x * -2.5)), wj, Float64(-2.0 * x)), wj, x)
end
code[wj_, x_] := N[(N[(N[(N[(N[(N[(N[(-3.0 * x + N[(0.6666666666666666 * x + N[(N[(x * -2.5), $MachinePrecision] * -2.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - -1.0), $MachinePrecision] * wj), $MachinePrecision] * -1.0 + 1.0), $MachinePrecision] - N[(x * -2.5), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] * wj + N[(-2.0 * x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] * wj + x), $MachinePrecision]
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(-3, x, \mathsf{fma}\left(0.6666666666666666, x, \left(x \cdot -2.5\right) \cdot -2\right)\right) - -1\right) \cdot wj, -1, 1\right) - x \cdot -2.5, wj, -2 \cdot x\right), wj, x\right)
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Initial program 74.4%

    \[wj - \frac{wj \cdot e^{wj} - x}{e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}} \]
  2. Add Preprocessing
  3. Taylor expanded in wj around 0

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + wj \cdot \left(wj \cdot \left(\left(1 + -1 \cdot \left(wj \cdot \left(1 + \left(-3 \cdot x + \left(-2 \cdot \left(-4 \cdot x + \frac{3}{2} \cdot x\right) + \frac{2}{3} \cdot x\right)\right)\right)\right)\right) - \left(-4 \cdot x + \frac{3}{2} \cdot x\right)\right) - 2 \cdot x\right)} \]
  4. Step-by-step derivation
    1. +-commutativeN/A

      \[\leadsto wj \cdot \left(wj \cdot \left(\left(1 + -1 \cdot \left(wj \cdot \left(1 + \left(-3 \cdot x + \left(-2 \cdot \left(-4 \cdot x + \frac{3}{2} \cdot x\right) + \frac{2}{3} \cdot x\right)\right)\right)\right)\right) - \left(-4 \cdot x + \frac{3}{2} \cdot x\right)\right) - 2 \cdot x\right) + \color{blue}{x} \]
    2. *-commutativeN/A

      \[\leadsto \left(wj \cdot \left(\left(1 + -1 \cdot \left(wj \cdot \left(1 + \left(-3 \cdot x + \left(-2 \cdot \left(-4 \cdot x + \frac{3}{2} \cdot x\right) + \frac{2}{3} \cdot x\right)\right)\right)\right)\right) - \left(-4 \cdot x + \frac{3}{2} \cdot x\right)\right) - 2 \cdot x\right) \cdot wj + x \]
    3. lower-fma.f64N/A

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(wj \cdot \left(\left(1 + -1 \cdot \left(wj \cdot \left(1 + \left(-3 \cdot x + \left(-2 \cdot \left(-4 \cdot x + \frac{3}{2} \cdot x\right) + \frac{2}{3} \cdot x\right)\right)\right)\right)\right) - \left(-4 \cdot x + \frac{3}{2} \cdot x\right)\right) - 2 \cdot x, \color{blue}{wj}, x\right) \]
  5. Applied rewrites96.7%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(-3, x, \mathsf{fma}\left(0.6666666666666666, x, \left(x \cdot -2.5\right) \cdot -2\right)\right) + 1\right) \cdot wj, -1, 1\right) - x \cdot -2.5, wj, -2 \cdot x\right), wj, x\right)} \]
  6. Final simplification96.7%

    \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(-3, x, \mathsf{fma}\left(0.6666666666666666, x, \left(x \cdot -2.5\right) \cdot -2\right)\right) - -1\right) \cdot wj, -1, 1\right) - x \cdot -2.5, wj, -2 \cdot x\right), wj, x\right) \]
  7. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 3: 96.4% accurate, N/A× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(-3, x, \mathsf{fma}\left(0.6666666666666666, x, \left(x \cdot -2.5\right) \cdot -2\right)\right) - -1\right) \cdot wj, -1, 1\right) - x \cdot -2.5, wj, -2 \cdot x\right) \cdot wj + x \end{array} \]
(FPCore (wj x)
 :precision binary64
 (+
  (*
   (fma
    (-
     (fma
      (*
       (- (fma -3.0 x (fma 0.6666666666666666 x (* (* x -2.5) -2.0))) -1.0)
       wj)
      -1.0
      1.0)
     (* x -2.5))
    wj
    (* -2.0 x))
   wj)
  x))
double code(double wj, double x) {
	return (fma((fma(((fma(-3.0, x, fma(0.6666666666666666, x, ((x * -2.5) * -2.0))) - -1.0) * wj), -1.0, 1.0) - (x * -2.5)), wj, (-2.0 * x)) * wj) + x;
}
function code(wj, x)
	return Float64(Float64(fma(Float64(fma(Float64(Float64(fma(-3.0, x, fma(0.6666666666666666, x, Float64(Float64(x * -2.5) * -2.0))) - -1.0) * wj), -1.0, 1.0) - Float64(x * -2.5)), wj, Float64(-2.0 * x)) * wj) + x)
end
code[wj_, x_] := N[(N[(N[(N[(N[(N[(N[(N[(-3.0 * x + N[(0.6666666666666666 * x + N[(N[(x * -2.5), $MachinePrecision] * -2.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - -1.0), $MachinePrecision] * wj), $MachinePrecision] * -1.0 + 1.0), $MachinePrecision] - N[(x * -2.5), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] * wj + N[(-2.0 * x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] * wj), $MachinePrecision] + x), $MachinePrecision]
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(-3, x, \mathsf{fma}\left(0.6666666666666666, x, \left(x \cdot -2.5\right) \cdot -2\right)\right) - -1\right) \cdot wj, -1, 1\right) - x \cdot -2.5, wj, -2 \cdot x\right) \cdot wj + x
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Initial program 74.4%

    \[wj - \frac{wj \cdot e^{wj} - x}{e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}} \]
  2. Add Preprocessing
  3. Taylor expanded in wj around 0

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + wj \cdot \left(wj \cdot \left(\left(1 + -1 \cdot \left(wj \cdot \left(1 + \left(-3 \cdot x + \left(-2 \cdot \left(-4 \cdot x + \frac{3}{2} \cdot x\right) + \frac{2}{3} \cdot x\right)\right)\right)\right)\right) - \left(-4 \cdot x + \frac{3}{2} \cdot x\right)\right) - 2 \cdot x\right)} \]
  4. Step-by-step derivation
    1. +-commutativeN/A

      \[\leadsto wj \cdot \left(wj \cdot \left(\left(1 + -1 \cdot \left(wj \cdot \left(1 + \left(-3 \cdot x + \left(-2 \cdot \left(-4 \cdot x + \frac{3}{2} \cdot x\right) + \frac{2}{3} \cdot x\right)\right)\right)\right)\right) - \left(-4 \cdot x + \frac{3}{2} \cdot x\right)\right) - 2 \cdot x\right) + \color{blue}{x} \]
    2. *-commutativeN/A

      \[\leadsto \left(wj \cdot \left(\left(1 + -1 \cdot \left(wj \cdot \left(1 + \left(-3 \cdot x + \left(-2 \cdot \left(-4 \cdot x + \frac{3}{2} \cdot x\right) + \frac{2}{3} \cdot x\right)\right)\right)\right)\right) - \left(-4 \cdot x + \frac{3}{2} \cdot x\right)\right) - 2 \cdot x\right) \cdot wj + x \]
    3. lower-fma.f64N/A

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(wj \cdot \left(\left(1 + -1 \cdot \left(wj \cdot \left(1 + \left(-3 \cdot x + \left(-2 \cdot \left(-4 \cdot x + \frac{3}{2} \cdot x\right) + \frac{2}{3} \cdot x\right)\right)\right)\right)\right) - \left(-4 \cdot x + \frac{3}{2} \cdot x\right)\right) - 2 \cdot x, \color{blue}{wj}, x\right) \]
  5. Applied rewrites96.7%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(-3, x, \mathsf{fma}\left(0.6666666666666666, x, \left(x \cdot -2.5\right) \cdot -2\right)\right) + 1\right) \cdot wj, -1, 1\right) - x \cdot -2.5, wj, -2 \cdot x\right), wj, x\right)} \]
  6. Applied rewrites96.7%

    \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(-3, x, \mathsf{fma}\left(0.6666666666666666, x, \left(x \cdot -2.5\right) \cdot -2\right)\right) + 1\right) \cdot wj, -1, 1\right) - x \cdot -2.5, wj, -2 \cdot x\right) \cdot wj + \color{blue}{x} \]
  7. Final simplification96.7%

    \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(-3, x, \mathsf{fma}\left(0.6666666666666666, x, \left(x \cdot -2.5\right) \cdot -2\right)\right) - -1\right) \cdot wj, -1, 1\right) - x \cdot -2.5, wj, -2 \cdot x\right) \cdot wj + x \]
  8. Add Preprocessing

Reproduce

?
herbie shell --seed 2025057 
(FPCore (wj x)
  :name "Jmat.Real.lambertw, newton loop step"
  :precision binary64

  :alt
  (! :herbie-platform herbie20 (let ((ew (exp wj))) (- wj (- (/ wj (+ wj 1)) (/ x (+ ew (* wj ew)))))))

  (- wj (/ (- (* wj (exp wj)) x) (+ (exp wj) (* wj (exp wj))))))