Diagrams.Backend.Rasterific:$crender from diagrams-rasterific-1.3.1.3

Percentage Accurate: 97.8% → 100.0%

Time: 3.0s

Alternatives: 7

Speedup: 1.7×

• 20.7% of points produce a very large (infinite) output. You may want to add a precondition.

Specification

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x \cdot y + \left(1 - x\right) \cdot z \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (+ (* x y) (* (- 1.0 x) z)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (x * y) + ((1.0 - x) * z);
}

Fortran

module fmin_fmax_functions
    implicit none
    private
    public fmax
    public fmin

    interface fmax
        module procedure fmax88
        module procedure fmax44
        module procedure fmax84
        module procedure fmax48
    end interface
    interface fmin
        module procedure fmin88
        module procedure fmin44
        module procedure fmin84
        module procedure fmin48
    end interface
contains
    real(8) function fmax88(x, y) result (res)
        real(8), intent (in) :: x
        real(8), intent (in) :: y
        res = merge(y, merge(x, max(x, y), y /= y), x /= x)
    end function
    real(4) function fmax44(x, y) result (res)
        real(4), intent (in) :: x
        real(4), intent (in) :: y
        res = merge(y, merge(x, max(x, y), y /= y), x /= x)
    end function
    real(8) function fmax84(x, y) result(res)
        real(8), intent (in) :: x
        real(4), intent (in) :: y
        res = merge(dble(y), merge(x, max(x, dble(y)), y /= y), x /= x)
    end function
    real(8) function fmax48(x, y) result(res)
        real(4), intent (in) :: x
        real(8), intent (in) :: y
        res = merge(y, merge(dble(x), max(dble(x), y), y /= y), x /= x)
    end function
    real(8) function fmin88(x, y) result (res)
        real(8), intent (in) :: x
        real(8), intent (in) :: y
        res = merge(y, merge(x, min(x, y), y /= y), x /= x)
    end function
    real(4) function fmin44(x, y) result (res)
        real(4), intent (in) :: x
        real(4), intent (in) :: y
        res = merge(y, merge(x, min(x, y), y /= y), x /= x)
    end function
    real(8) function fmin84(x, y) result(res)
        real(8), intent (in) :: x
        real(4), intent (in) :: y
        res = merge(dble(y), merge(x, min(x, dble(y)), y /= y), x /= x)
    end function
    real(8) function fmin48(x, y) result(res)
        real(4), intent (in) :: x
        real(8), intent (in) :: y
        res = merge(y, merge(dble(x), min(dble(x), y), y /= y), x /= x)
    end function
end module

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
use fmin_fmax_functions
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = (x * y) + ((1.0d0 - x) * z)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (x * y) + ((1.0 - x) * z);
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return (x * y) + ((1.0 - x) * z)

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(Float64(x * y) + Float64(Float64(1.0 - x) * z))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = (x * y) + ((1.0 - x) * z);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(1.0 - x), $MachinePrecision] * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Initial Program: 97.8% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x \cdot y + \left(1 - x\right) \cdot z \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (+ (* x y) (* (- 1.0 x) z)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (x * y) + ((1.0 - x) * z);
}

Fortran

module fmin_fmax_functions
    implicit none
    private
    public fmax
    public fmin

    interface fmax
        module procedure fmax88
        module procedure fmax44
        module procedure fmax84
        module procedure fmax48
    end interface
    interface fmin
        module procedure fmin88
        module procedure fmin44
        module procedure fmin84
        module procedure fmin48
    end interface
contains
    real(8) function fmax88(x, y) result (res)
        real(8), intent (in) :: x
        real(8), intent (in) :: y
        res = merge(y, merge(x, max(x, y), y /= y), x /= x)
    end function
    real(4) function fmax44(x, y) result (res)
        real(4), intent (in) :: x
        real(4), intent (in) :: y
        res = merge(y, merge(x, max(x, y), y /= y), x /= x)
    end function
    real(8) function fmax84(x, y) result(res)
        real(8), intent (in) :: x
        real(4), intent (in) :: y
        res = merge(dble(y), merge(x, max(x, dble(y)), y /= y), x /= x)
    end function
    real(8) function fmax48(x, y) result(res)
        real(4), intent (in) :: x
        real(8), intent (in) :: y
        res = merge(y, merge(dble(x), max(dble(x), y), y /= y), x /= x)
    end function
    real(8) function fmin88(x, y) result (res)
        real(8), intent (in) :: x
        real(8), intent (in) :: y
        res = merge(y, merge(x, min(x, y), y /= y), x /= x)
    end function
    real(4) function fmin44(x, y) result (res)
        real(4), intent (in) :: x
        real(4), intent (in) :: y
        res = merge(y, merge(x, min(x, y), y /= y), x /= x)
    end function
    real(8) function fmin84(x, y) result(res)
        real(8), intent (in) :: x
        real(4), intent (in) :: y
        res = merge(dble(y), merge(x, min(x, dble(y)), y /= y), x /= x)
    end function
    real(8) function fmin48(x, y) result(res)
        real(4), intent (in) :: x
        real(8), intent (in) :: y
        res = merge(y, merge(dble(x), min(dble(x), y), y /= y), x /= x)
    end function
end module

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
use fmin_fmax_functions
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = (x * y) + ((1.0d0 - x) * z)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (x * y) + ((1.0 - x) * z);
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return (x * y) + ((1.0 - x) * z)

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(Float64(x * y) + Float64(Float64(1.0 - x) * z))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = (x * y) + ((1.0 - x) * z);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(1.0 - x), $MachinePrecision] * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Alternative 1: 100.0% accurate, 1.7× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \mathsf{fma}\left(y - z, x, z\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (fma (- y z) x z))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return fma((y - z), x, z);
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return fma(Float64(y - z), x, z)
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(N[(y - z), $MachinePrecision] * x + z), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 98.4%

   \[x \cdot y + \left(1 - x\right) \cdot z \]
2. Add Preprocessing

3. Taylor expanded in x around 0

   \[\leadsto x \cdot y + \color{blue}{z} \]
4. Step-by-step derivation

5. Applied rewrites 72.4%

   \[\leadsto x \cdot y + \color{blue}{z} \]
6. Step-by-step derivation

   1. lift-+.f64 N/A

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot y + z} \]

   2. lift-*.f64 N/A

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot y} + z \]

   3. *-commutative N/A

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot x} + z \]

   4. lower-fma.f64 72.4

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, x, z\right)} \]

7. Applied rewrites 72.4%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, x, z\right)} \]

8. Taylor expanded in x around 0

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z + x \cdot \left(y + -1 \cdot z\right)} \]
9. Step-by-step derivation

   1. +-commutative N/A

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z} + x \cdot \left(y + -1 \cdot z\right) \]

   2. *-commutative N/A

      \[\leadsto z + x \cdot \left(y + -1 \cdot z\right) \]

   3. +-commutative N/A

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z} + x \cdot \left(y + -1 \cdot z\right) \]

   4. +-commutative N/A

      \[\leadsto x \cdot \left(y + -1 \cdot z\right) + \color{blue}{z} \]

   5. *-commutative N/A

      \[\leadsto \left(y + -1 \cdot z\right) \cdot x + z \]

   6. lower-fma.f64 N/A

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y + -1 \cdot z, \color{blue}{x}, z\right) \]

   7. fp-cancel-sign-sub-inv N/A

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y - \left(\mathsf{neg}\left(-1\right)\right) \cdot z, x, z\right) \]

   8. metadata-eval N/A

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y - 1 \cdot z, x, z\right) \]

   9. *-lft-identity N/A

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y - z, x, z\right) \]

   10. lower--.f64 100.0

       \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y - z, x, z\right) \]

10. Applied rewrites 100.0%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y - z, x, z\right)} \]
11. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 2: 98.8% accurate, 0.8× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -1 \lor \neg \left(x \leq 1\right):\\ \;\;\;\;\left(y - z\right) \cdot x\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(y, x, z\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= x -1.0) (not (<= x 1.0))) (* (- y z) x) (fma y x z)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x <= -1.0) || !(x <= 1.0)) {
		tmp = (y - z) * x;
	} else {
		tmp = fma(y, x, z);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((x <= -1.0) || !(x <= 1.0))
		tmp = Float64(Float64(y - z) * x);
	else
		tmp = fma(y, x, z);
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[Or[LessEqual[x, -1.0], N[Not[LessEqual[x, 1.0]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(N[(y - z), $MachinePrecision] * x), $MachinePrecision], N[(y * x + z), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if x < -1 or 1 < x

   1. Initial program 96.9%

      \[x \cdot y + \left(1 - x\right) \cdot z \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around -inf

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot \left(x \cdot \left(z + -1 \cdot y\right)\right)} \]

   5. Applied rewrites 98.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-x\right) \cdot \left(z - y\right)} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. lift-neg.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \left(\mathsf{neg}\left(x\right)\right) \cdot \left(\color{blue}{z} - y\right) \]

      2. mul-1-neg N/A

         \[\leadsto \left(-1 \cdot x\right) \cdot \left(\color{blue}{z} - y\right) \]

      3. lift--.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \left(-1 \cdot x\right) \cdot \left(z - \color{blue}{y}\right) \]

      4. lower-*.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \left(-1 \cdot x\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(z - y\right)} \]

      5. distribute-lft-out-- N/A

         \[\leadsto \left(-1 \cdot x\right) \cdot z - \color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot x\right) \cdot y} \]

      6. associate-*r* N/A

         \[\leadsto -1 \cdot \left(x \cdot z\right) - \color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot x\right)} \cdot y \]

      7. mul-1-neg N/A

         \[\leadsto -1 \cdot \left(x \cdot z\right) - \left(\mathsf{neg}\left(x\right)\right) \cdot y \]

      8. cancel-sign-sub N/A

         \[\leadsto -1 \cdot \left(x \cdot z\right) + \color{blue}{x \cdot y} \]

      9. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto x \cdot y + \color{blue}{-1 \cdot \left(x \cdot z\right)} \]

      10. *-commutative N/A

          \[\leadsto x \cdot y + \left(x \cdot z\right) \cdot \color{blue}{-1} \]

      11. associate-*r* N/A

          \[\leadsto x \cdot y + x \cdot \color{blue}{\left(z \cdot -1\right)} \]

      12. *-commutative N/A

          \[\leadsto x \cdot y + x \cdot \left(-1 \cdot \color{blue}{z}\right) \]

      13. distribute-lft-in N/A

          \[\leadsto x \cdot \color{blue}{\left(y + -1 \cdot z\right)} \]

      14. *-commutative N/A

          \[\leadsto \left(y + -1 \cdot z\right) \cdot \color{blue}{x} \]

      15. lower-*.f64 N/A

          \[\leadsto \left(y + -1 \cdot z\right) \cdot \color{blue}{x} \]

      16. fp-cancel-sign-sub-inv N/A

          \[\leadsto \left(y - \left(\mathsf{neg}\left(-1\right)\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot x \]

      17. metadata-eval N/A

          \[\leadsto \left(y - 1 \cdot z\right) \cdot x \]

      18. *-lft-identity N/A

          \[\leadsto \left(y - z\right) \cdot x \]

      19. lower--.f64 98.9

          \[\leadsto \left(y - z\right) \cdot x \]

   7. Applied rewrites 98.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y - z\right) \cdot x} \]

   if -1 < x < 1

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[x \cdot y + \left(1 - x\right) \cdot z \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around 0

      \[\leadsto x \cdot y + \color{blue}{z} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

   5. Applied rewrites 96.6%

      \[\leadsto x \cdot y + \color{blue}{z} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. lift-+.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot y + z} \]

      2. lift-*.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot y} + z \]

      3. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot x} + z \]

      4. lower-fma.f64 96.6

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, x, z\right)} \]

   7. Applied rewrites 96.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, x, z\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 97.8%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -1 \lor \neg \left(x \leq 1\right):\\ \;\;\;\;\left(y - z\right) \cdot x\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(y, x, z\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 3: 85.2% accurate, 0.8× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -650000 \lor \neg \left(z \leq 5.2 \cdot 10^{-60}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;\left(1 - x\right) \cdot z\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(y, x, z\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= z -650000.0) (not (<= z 5.2e-60))) (* (- 1.0 x) z) (fma y x z)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z <= -650000.0) || !(z <= 5.2e-60)) {
		tmp = (1.0 - x) * z;
	} else {
		tmp = fma(y, x, z);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((z <= -650000.0) || !(z <= 5.2e-60))
		tmp = Float64(Float64(1.0 - x) * z);
	else
		tmp = fma(y, x, z);
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[Or[LessEqual[z, -650000.0], N[Not[LessEqual[z, 5.2e-60]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(N[(1.0 - x), $MachinePrecision] * z), $MachinePrecision], N[(y * x + z), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if z < -6.5e5 or 5.1999999999999995e-60 < z

   1. Initial program 97.3%

      \[x \cdot y + \left(1 - x\right) \cdot z \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in y around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(1 - x\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \left(1 - x\right) \cdot \color{blue}{z} \]

      2. lift-*.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \left(1 - x\right) \cdot \color{blue}{z} \]

      3. lift--.f64 86.7

         \[\leadsto \left(1 - x\right) \cdot z \]

   5. Applied rewrites 86.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - x\right) \cdot z} \]

   if -6.5e5 < z < 5.1999999999999995e-60

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[x \cdot y + \left(1 - x\right) \cdot z \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around 0

      \[\leadsto x \cdot y + \color{blue}{z} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

   5. Applied rewrites 89.7%

      \[\leadsto x \cdot y + \color{blue}{z} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. lift-+.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot y + z} \]

      2. lift-*.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot y} + z \]

      3. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot x} + z \]

      4. lower-fma.f64 89.7

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, x, z\right)} \]

   7. Applied rewrites 89.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, x, z\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 87.9%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -650000 \lor \neg \left(z \leq 5.2 \cdot 10^{-60}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;\left(1 - x\right) \cdot z\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(y, x, z\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 4: 75.3% accurate, 0.8× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -2.3 \cdot 10^{+192} \lor \neg \left(x \leq 3.9 \cdot 10^{+26}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;\left(-x\right) \cdot z\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(y, x, z\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= x -2.3e+192) (not (<= x 3.9e+26))) (* (- x) z) (fma y x z)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x <= -2.3e+192) || !(x <= 3.9e+26)) {
		tmp = -x * z;
	} else {
		tmp = fma(y, x, z);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((x <= -2.3e+192) || !(x <= 3.9e+26))
		tmp = Float64(Float64(-x) * z);
	else
		tmp = fma(y, x, z);
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[Or[LessEqual[x, -2.3e+192], N[Not[LessEqual[x, 3.9e+26]], $MachinePrecision]], N[((-x) * z), $MachinePrecision], N[(y * x + z), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if x < -2.2999999999999999e192 or 3.9e26 < x

   1. Initial program 95.5%

      \[x \cdot y + \left(1 - x\right) \cdot z \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in y around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(1 - x\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \left(1 - x\right) \cdot \color{blue}{z} \]

      2. lift-*.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \left(1 - x\right) \cdot \color{blue}{z} \]

      3. lift--.f64 67.9

         \[\leadsto \left(1 - x\right) \cdot z \]

   5. Applied rewrites 67.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - x\right) \cdot z} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in x around inf

      \[\leadsto \left(-1 \cdot x\right) \cdot z \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

      1. mul-1-neg N/A

         \[\leadsto \left(\mathsf{neg}\left(x\right)\right) \cdot z \]

      2. lower-neg.f64 67.9

         \[\leadsto \left(-x\right) \cdot z \]

   8. Applied rewrites 67.9%

      \[\leadsto \left(-x\right) \cdot z \]

   if -2.2999999999999999e192 < x < 3.9e26

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[x \cdot y + \left(1 - x\right) \cdot z \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around 0

      \[\leadsto x \cdot y + \color{blue}{z} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

   5. Applied rewrites 89.2%

      \[\leadsto x \cdot y + \color{blue}{z} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. lift-+.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot y + z} \]

      2. lift-*.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot y} + z \]

      3. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot x} + z \]

      4. lower-fma.f64 89.3

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, x, z\right)} \]

   7. Applied rewrites 89.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, x, z\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 81.9%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -2.3 \cdot 10^{+192} \lor \neg \left(x \leq 3.9 \cdot 10^{+26}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;\left(-x\right) \cdot z\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(y, x, z\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 5: 60.6% accurate, 0.9× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -9600000000000 \lor \neg \left(x \leq 1.16 \cdot 10^{-89}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot x\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;z\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= x -9600000000000.0) (not (<= x 1.16e-89))) (* y x) z))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x <= -9600000000000.0) || !(x <= 1.16e-89)) {
		tmp = y * x;
	} else {
		tmp = z;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

module fmin_fmax_functions
    implicit none
    private
    public fmax
    public fmin

    interface fmax
        module procedure fmax88
        module procedure fmax44
        module procedure fmax84
        module procedure fmax48
    end interface
    interface fmin
        module procedure fmin88
        module procedure fmin44
        module procedure fmin84
        module procedure fmin48
    end interface
contains
    real(8) function fmax88(x, y) result (res)
        real(8), intent (in) :: x
        real(8), intent (in) :: y
        res = merge(y, merge(x, max(x, y), y /= y), x /= x)
    end function
    real(4) function fmax44(x, y) result (res)
        real(4), intent (in) :: x
        real(4), intent (in) :: y
        res = merge(y, merge(x, max(x, y), y /= y), x /= x)
    end function
    real(8) function fmax84(x, y) result(res)
        real(8), intent (in) :: x
        real(4), intent (in) :: y
        res = merge(dble(y), merge(x, max(x, dble(y)), y /= y), x /= x)
    end function
    real(8) function fmax48(x, y) result(res)
        real(4), intent (in) :: x
        real(8), intent (in) :: y
        res = merge(y, merge(dble(x), max(dble(x), y), y /= y), x /= x)
    end function
    real(8) function fmin88(x, y) result (res)
        real(8), intent (in) :: x
        real(8), intent (in) :: y
        res = merge(y, merge(x, min(x, y), y /= y), x /= x)
    end function
    real(4) function fmin44(x, y) result (res)
        real(4), intent (in) :: x
        real(4), intent (in) :: y
        res = merge(y, merge(x, min(x, y), y /= y), x /= x)
    end function
    real(8) function fmin84(x, y) result(res)
        real(8), intent (in) :: x
        real(4), intent (in) :: y
        res = merge(dble(y), merge(x, min(x, dble(y)), y /= y), x /= x)
    end function
    real(8) function fmin48(x, y) result(res)
        real(4), intent (in) :: x
        real(8), intent (in) :: y
        res = merge(y, merge(dble(x), min(dble(x), y), y /= y), x /= x)
    end function
end module

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
use fmin_fmax_functions
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((x <= (-9600000000000.0d0)) .or. (.not. (x <= 1.16d-89))) then
        tmp = y * x
    else
        tmp = z
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x <= -9600000000000.0) || !(x <= 1.16e-89)) {
		tmp = y * x;
	} else {
		tmp = z;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if (x <= -9600000000000.0) or not (x <= 1.16e-89):
		tmp = y * x
	else:
		tmp = z
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((x <= -9600000000000.0) || !(x <= 1.16e-89))
		tmp = Float64(y * x);
	else
		tmp = z;
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((x <= -9600000000000.0) || ~((x <= 1.16e-89)))
		tmp = y * x;
	else
		tmp = z;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[Or[LessEqual[x, -9600000000000.0], N[Not[LessEqual[x, 1.16e-89]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(y * x), $MachinePrecision], z]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if x < -9.6e12 or 1.15999999999999993e-89 < x

   1. Initial program 97.3%

      \[x \cdot y + \left(1 - x\right) \cdot z \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in y around inf

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot y} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto y \cdot \color{blue}{x} \]

      2. lower-*.f64 49.1

         \[\leadsto y \cdot \color{blue}{x} \]

   5. Applied rewrites 49.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot x} \]

   if -9.6e12 < x < 1.15999999999999993e-89

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[x \cdot y + \left(1 - x\right) \cdot z \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

   5. Applied rewrites 71.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 58.3%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -9600000000000 \lor \neg \left(x \leq 1.16 \cdot 10^{-89}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot x\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;z\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 6: 76.5% accurate, 2.4× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \mathsf{fma}\left(y, x, z\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (fma y x z))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return fma(y, x, z);
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return fma(y, x, z)
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(y * x + z), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 98.4%

   \[x \cdot y + \left(1 - x\right) \cdot z \]
2. Add Preprocessing

3. Taylor expanded in x around 0

   \[\leadsto x \cdot y + \color{blue}{z} \]
4. Step-by-step derivation

5. Applied rewrites 72.4%

   \[\leadsto x \cdot y + \color{blue}{z} \]
6. Step-by-step derivation

   1. lift-+.f64 N/A

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot y + z} \]

   2. lift-*.f64 N/A

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot y} + z \]

   3. *-commutative N/A

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot x} + z \]

   4. lower-fma.f64 72.4

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, x, z\right)} \]

7. Applied rewrites 72.4%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, x, z\right)} \]
8. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 7: 37.3% accurate, 17.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ z \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 z)

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return z;
}

Fortran

module fmin_fmax_functions
    implicit none
    private
    public fmax
    public fmin

    interface fmax
        module procedure fmax88
        module procedure fmax44
        module procedure fmax84
        module procedure fmax48
    end interface
    interface fmin
        module procedure fmin88
        module procedure fmin44
        module procedure fmin84
        module procedure fmin48
    end interface
contains
    real(8) function fmax88(x, y) result (res)
        real(8), intent (in) :: x
        real(8), intent (in) :: y
        res = merge(y, merge(x, max(x, y), y /= y), x /= x)
    end function
    real(4) function fmax44(x, y) result (res)
        real(4), intent (in) :: x
        real(4), intent (in) :: y
        res = merge(y, merge(x, max(x, y), y /= y), x /= x)
    end function
    real(8) function fmax84(x, y) result(res)
        real(8), intent (in) :: x
        real(4), intent (in) :: y
        res = merge(dble(y), merge(x, max(x, dble(y)), y /= y), x /= x)
    end function
    real(8) function fmax48(x, y) result(res)
        real(4), intent (in) :: x
        real(8), intent (in) :: y
        res = merge(y, merge(dble(x), max(dble(x), y), y /= y), x /= x)
    end function
    real(8) function fmin88(x, y) result (res)
        real(8), intent (in) :: x
        real(8), intent (in) :: y
        res = merge(y, merge(x, min(x, y), y /= y), x /= x)
    end function
    real(4) function fmin44(x, y) result (res)
        real(4), intent (in) :: x
        real(4), intent (in) :: y
        res = merge(y, merge(x, min(x, y), y /= y), x /= x)
    end function
    real(8) function fmin84(x, y) result(res)
        real(8), intent (in) :: x
        real(4), intent (in) :: y
        res = merge(dble(y), merge(x, min(x, dble(y)), y /= y), x /= x)
    end function
    real(8) function fmin48(x, y) result(res)
        real(4), intent (in) :: x
        real(8), intent (in) :: y
        res = merge(y, merge(dble(x), min(dble(x), y), y /= y), x /= x)
    end function
end module

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
use fmin_fmax_functions
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = z
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return z;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return z

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return z
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = z;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := z

Derivation

1. Initial program 98.4%

   \[x \cdot y + \left(1 - x\right) \cdot z \]
2. Add Preprocessing

3. Taylor expanded in x around 0

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z} \]
4. Step-by-step derivation

5. Applied rewrites 34.3%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z} \]
6. Add Preprocessing

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2025057 
(FPCore (x y z)
  :name "Diagrams.Backend.Rasterific:$crender from diagrams-rasterific-1.3.1.3"
  :precision binary64
  (+ (* x y) (* (- 1.0 x) z)))