VandenBroeck and Keller, Equation (6)

Percentage Accurate: 75.9% → 99.3%
Time: 4.8s
Alternatives: 9
Speedup: 4.4×

Specification

?
\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_0 := \mathsf{PI}\left(\right) \cdot \ell\\ t\_0 - \frac{1}{F \cdot F} \cdot \tan t\_0 \end{array} \end{array} \]
(FPCore (F l)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_0 (* (PI) l))) (- t_0 (* (/ 1.0 (* F F)) (tan t_0)))))
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\begin{array}{l}
t_0 := \mathsf{PI}\left(\right) \cdot \ell\\
t\_0 - \frac{1}{F \cdot F} \cdot \tan t\_0
\end{array}
\end{array}

Sampling outcomes in binary64 precision:

Local Percentage Accuracy vs ?

The average percentage accuracy by input value. Horizontal axis shows value of an input variable; the variable is choosen in the title. Vertical axis is accuracy; higher is better. Red represent the original program, while blue represents Herbie's suggestion. These can be toggled with buttons below the plot. The line is an average while dots represent individual samples.

Accuracy vs Speed?

Herbie found 9 alternatives:

AlternativeAccuracySpeedup
The accuracy (vertical axis) and speed (horizontal axis) of each alternatives. Up and to the right is better. The red square shows the initial program, and each blue circle shows an alternative.The line shows the best available speed-accuracy tradeoffs.

Initial Program: 75.9% accurate, 1.0× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_0 := \mathsf{PI}\left(\right) \cdot \ell\\ t\_0 - \frac{1}{F \cdot F} \cdot \tan t\_0 \end{array} \end{array} \]
(FPCore (F l)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_0 (* (PI) l))) (- t_0 (* (/ 1.0 (* F F)) (tan t_0)))))
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\begin{array}{l}
t_0 := \mathsf{PI}\left(\right) \cdot \ell\\
t\_0 - \frac{1}{F \cdot F} \cdot \tan t\_0
\end{array}
\end{array}

Alternative 1: 99.3% accurate, 1.0× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} l\_m = \left|\ell\right| \\ l\_s = \mathsf{copysign}\left(1, \ell\right) \\ \begin{array}{l} t_0 := l\_m \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right)\\ l\_s \cdot \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;l\_m \leq 6.8 \cdot 10^{+14}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{PI}\left(\right) \cdot l\_m - \frac{\frac{\tan t\_0}{F}}{F}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_0\\ \end{array} \end{array} \end{array} \]
l\_m = (fabs.f64 l)
l\_s = (copysign.f64 #s(literal 1 binary64) l)
(FPCore (l_s F l_m)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_0 (* l_m (PI))))
   (* l_s (if (<= l_m 6.8e+14) (- (* (PI) l_m) (/ (/ (tan t_0) F) F)) t_0))))
\begin{array}{l}
l\_m = \left|\ell\right|
\\
l\_s = \mathsf{copysign}\left(1, \ell\right)

\\
\begin{array}{l}
t_0 := l\_m \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right)\\
l\_s \cdot \begin{array}{l}
\mathbf{if}\;l\_m \leq 6.8 \cdot 10^{+14}:\\
\;\;\;\;\mathsf{PI}\left(\right) \cdot l\_m - \frac{\frac{\tan t\_0}{F}}{F}\\

\mathbf{else}:\\
\;\;\;\;t\_0\\


\end{array}
\end{array}
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Split input into 2 regimes
  2. if l < 6.8e14

    1. Initial program 78.8%

      \[\mathsf{PI}\left(\right) \cdot \ell - \frac{1}{F \cdot F} \cdot \tan \left(\mathsf{PI}\left(\right) \cdot \ell\right) \]
    2. Add Preprocessing
    3. Applied rewrites87.5%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{PI}\left(\right) \cdot \ell - \color{blue}{\frac{1}{-F} \cdot \frac{\tan \left(\ell \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right)\right)}{-F}} \]
    4. Applied rewrites87.5%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{PI}\left(\right) \cdot \ell - \color{blue}{\frac{1 \cdot \frac{\tan \left(\ell \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right)\right)}{-F}}{-F}} \]
    5. Applied rewrites87.5%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{PI}\left(\right) \cdot \ell - \color{blue}{\frac{\frac{\tan \left(\ell \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right)\right)}{F}}{F}} \]

    if 6.8e14 < l

    1. Initial program 63.6%

      \[\mathsf{PI}\left(\right) \cdot \ell - \frac{1}{F \cdot F} \cdot \tan \left(\mathsf{PI}\left(\right) \cdot \ell\right) \]
    2. Add Preprocessing
    3. Taylor expanded in F around inf

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\ell \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right)} \]
    4. Applied rewrites99.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\ell \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right)} \]
  3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
  4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 2: 82.7% accurate, 0.4× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} l\_m = \left|\ell\right| \\ l\_s = \mathsf{copysign}\left(1, \ell\right) \\ \begin{array}{l} t_0 := \mathsf{PI}\left(\right) \cdot l\_m\\ t_1 := t\_0 - \frac{1}{F \cdot F} \cdot \tan t\_0\\ l\_s \cdot \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;t\_1 \leq -5 \cdot 10^{+263} \lor \neg \left(t\_1 \leq -1 \cdot 10^{-210}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;l\_m \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(-l\_m\right) \cdot \frac{\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{F \cdot F}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \end{array} \]
l\_m = (fabs.f64 l)
l\_s = (copysign.f64 #s(literal 1 binary64) l)
(FPCore (l_s F l_m)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_0 (* (PI) l_m)) (t_1 (- t_0 (* (/ 1.0 (* F F)) (tan t_0)))))
   (*
    l_s
    (if (or (<= t_1 -5e+263) (not (<= t_1 -1e-210)))
      (* l_m (PI))
      (* (- l_m) (/ (PI) (* F F)))))))
\begin{array}{l}
l\_m = \left|\ell\right|
\\
l\_s = \mathsf{copysign}\left(1, \ell\right)

\\
\begin{array}{l}
t_0 := \mathsf{PI}\left(\right) \cdot l\_m\\
t_1 := t\_0 - \frac{1}{F \cdot F} \cdot \tan t\_0\\
l\_s \cdot \begin{array}{l}
\mathbf{if}\;t\_1 \leq -5 \cdot 10^{+263} \lor \neg \left(t\_1 \leq -1 \cdot 10^{-210}\right):\\
\;\;\;\;l\_m \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right)\\

\mathbf{else}:\\
\;\;\;\;\left(-l\_m\right) \cdot \frac{\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{F \cdot F}\\


\end{array}
\end{array}
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Split input into 2 regimes
  2. if (-.f64 (*.f64 (PI.f64) l) (*.f64 (/.f64 #s(literal 1 binary64) (*.f64 F F)) (tan.f64 (*.f64 (PI.f64) l)))) < -5.00000000000000022e263 or -1e-210 < (-.f64 (*.f64 (PI.f64) l) (*.f64 (/.f64 #s(literal 1 binary64) (*.f64 F F)) (tan.f64 (*.f64 (PI.f64) l))))

    1. Initial program 65.2%

      \[\mathsf{PI}\left(\right) \cdot \ell - \frac{1}{F \cdot F} \cdot \tan \left(\mathsf{PI}\left(\right) \cdot \ell\right) \]
    2. Add Preprocessing
    3. Taylor expanded in F around inf

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\ell \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right)} \]
    4. Applied rewrites74.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\ell \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right)} \]

    if -5.00000000000000022e263 < (-.f64 (*.f64 (PI.f64) l) (*.f64 (/.f64 #s(literal 1 binary64) (*.f64 F F)) (tan.f64 (*.f64 (PI.f64) l)))) < -1e-210

    1. Initial program 98.2%

      \[\mathsf{PI}\left(\right) \cdot \ell - \frac{1}{F \cdot F} \cdot \tan \left(\mathsf{PI}\left(\right) \cdot \ell\right) \]
    2. Add Preprocessing
    3. Taylor expanded in F around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot \frac{\sin \left(\ell \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right)\right)}{{F}^{2} \cdot \cos \left(\ell \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right)\right)}} \]
    4. Applied rewrites27.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{-1}{F \cdot F} \cdot \tan \left(\ell \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right)\right)} \]
    5. Taylor expanded in l around 0

      \[\leadsto -1 \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{\ell \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{{F}^{2}}} \]
    6. Applied rewrites25.0%

      \[\leadsto -\ell \cdot \frac{\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{F \cdot F} \]
  3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
  4. Final simplification60.2%

    \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\mathsf{PI}\left(\right) \cdot \ell - \frac{1}{F \cdot F} \cdot \tan \left(\mathsf{PI}\left(\right) \cdot \ell\right) \leq -5 \cdot 10^{+263} \lor \neg \left(\mathsf{PI}\left(\right) \cdot \ell - \frac{1}{F \cdot F} \cdot \tan \left(\mathsf{PI}\left(\right) \cdot \ell\right) \leq -1 \cdot 10^{-210}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;\ell \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(-\ell\right) \cdot \frac{\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{F \cdot F}\\ \end{array} \]
  5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 3: 98.5% accurate, 1.6× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} l\_m = \left|\ell\right| \\ l\_s = \mathsf{copysign}\left(1, \ell\right) \\ l\_s \cdot \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;l\_m \leq 90000000000000:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{PI}\left(\right) \cdot l\_m - \frac{-1}{F} \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(\frac{\left(\mathsf{PI}\left(\right) \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right)\right) \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{F} \cdot 0.3333333333333333, l\_m \cdot l\_m, \frac{\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{F}\right) \cdot \left(-l\_m\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;l\_m \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]
l\_m = (fabs.f64 l)
l\_s = (copysign.f64 #s(literal 1 binary64) l)
(FPCore (l_s F l_m)
 :precision binary64
 (*
  l_s
  (if (<= l_m 90000000000000.0)
    (-
     (* (PI) l_m)
     (*
      (/ -1.0 F)
      (*
       (fma
        (* (/ (* (* (PI) (PI)) (PI)) F) 0.3333333333333333)
        (* l_m l_m)
        (/ (PI) F))
       (- l_m))))
    (* l_m (PI)))))
\begin{array}{l}
l\_m = \left|\ell\right|
\\
l\_s = \mathsf{copysign}\left(1, \ell\right)

\\
l\_s \cdot \begin{array}{l}
\mathbf{if}\;l\_m \leq 90000000000000:\\
\;\;\;\;\mathsf{PI}\left(\right) \cdot l\_m - \frac{-1}{F} \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(\frac{\left(\mathsf{PI}\left(\right) \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right)\right) \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{F} \cdot 0.3333333333333333, l\_m \cdot l\_m, \frac{\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{F}\right) \cdot \left(-l\_m\right)\right)\\

\mathbf{else}:\\
\;\;\;\;l\_m \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right)\\


\end{array}
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Split input into 2 regimes
  2. if l < 9e13

    1. Initial program 78.8%

      \[\mathsf{PI}\left(\right) \cdot \ell - \frac{1}{F \cdot F} \cdot \tan \left(\mathsf{PI}\left(\right) \cdot \ell\right) \]
    2. Add Preprocessing
    3. Applied rewrites87.5%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{PI}\left(\right) \cdot \ell - \color{blue}{\frac{1}{-F} \cdot \frac{\tan \left(\ell \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right)\right)}{-F}} \]
    4. Taylor expanded in l around 0

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{PI}\left(\right) \cdot \ell - \frac{1}{-F} \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\ell \cdot \left(-1 \cdot \left({\ell}^{2} \cdot \left(\frac{-1}{6} \cdot \frac{{\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}^{3}}{F} - \frac{-1}{2} \cdot \frac{{\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}^{3}}{F}\right)\right) + -1 \cdot \frac{\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{F}\right)\right)} \]
    5. Applied rewrites71.7%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{PI}\left(\right) \cdot \ell - \frac{1}{-F} \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\left(-1 \cdot \mathsf{fma}\left(\frac{{\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}^{3}}{F} \cdot 0.3333333333333333, \ell \cdot \ell, \frac{\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{F}\right)\right) \cdot \ell\right)} \]
    6. Applied rewrites71.7%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{PI}\left(\right) \cdot \ell - \frac{1}{-F} \cdot \left(\left(-1 \cdot \mathsf{fma}\left(\frac{\left(\mathsf{PI}\left(\right) \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right)\right) \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{F} \cdot 0.3333333333333333, \ell \cdot \ell, \frac{\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{F}\right)\right) \cdot \ell\right) \]

    if 9e13 < l

    1. Initial program 63.6%

      \[\mathsf{PI}\left(\right) \cdot \ell - \frac{1}{F \cdot F} \cdot \tan \left(\mathsf{PI}\left(\right) \cdot \ell\right) \]
    2. Add Preprocessing
    3. Taylor expanded in F around inf

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\ell \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right)} \]
    4. Applied rewrites99.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\ell \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right)} \]
  3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
  4. Final simplification79.0%

    \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\ell \leq 90000000000000:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{PI}\left(\right) \cdot \ell - \frac{-1}{F} \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(\frac{\left(\mathsf{PI}\left(\right) \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right)\right) \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{F} \cdot 0.3333333333333333, \ell \cdot \ell, \frac{\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{F}\right) \cdot \left(-\ell\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\ell \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right)\\ \end{array} \]
  5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 4: 98.6% accurate, 3.2× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} l\_m = \left|\ell\right| \\ l\_s = \mathsf{copysign}\left(1, \ell\right) \\ \begin{array}{l} t_0 := l\_m \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right)\\ l\_s \cdot \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;l\_m \leq 2.4 \cdot 10^{+14}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{PI}\left(\right) \cdot l\_m - \frac{\frac{t\_0}{F}}{F}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_0\\ \end{array} \end{array} \end{array} \]
l\_m = (fabs.f64 l)
l\_s = (copysign.f64 #s(literal 1 binary64) l)
(FPCore (l_s F l_m)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_0 (* l_m (PI))))
   (* l_s (if (<= l_m 2.4e+14) (- (* (PI) l_m) (/ (/ t_0 F) F)) t_0))))
\begin{array}{l}
l\_m = \left|\ell\right|
\\
l\_s = \mathsf{copysign}\left(1, \ell\right)

\\
\begin{array}{l}
t_0 := l\_m \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right)\\
l\_s \cdot \begin{array}{l}
\mathbf{if}\;l\_m \leq 2.4 \cdot 10^{+14}:\\
\;\;\;\;\mathsf{PI}\left(\right) \cdot l\_m - \frac{\frac{t\_0}{F}}{F}\\

\mathbf{else}:\\
\;\;\;\;t\_0\\


\end{array}
\end{array}
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Split input into 2 regimes
  2. if l < 2.4e14

    1. Initial program 78.8%

      \[\mathsf{PI}\left(\right) \cdot \ell - \frac{1}{F \cdot F} \cdot \tan \left(\mathsf{PI}\left(\right) \cdot \ell\right) \]
    2. Add Preprocessing
    3. Applied rewrites87.5%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{PI}\left(\right) \cdot \ell - \color{blue}{\frac{1}{-F} \cdot \frac{\tan \left(\ell \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right)\right)}{-F}} \]
    4. Applied rewrites87.5%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{PI}\left(\right) \cdot \ell - \color{blue}{\frac{1 \cdot \frac{\tan \left(\ell \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right)\right)}{-F}}{-F}} \]
    5. Applied rewrites87.5%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{PI}\left(\right) \cdot \ell - \color{blue}{\frac{\frac{\tan \left(\ell \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right)\right)}{F}}{F}} \]
    6. Taylor expanded in l around 0

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{PI}\left(\right) \cdot \ell - \frac{\frac{\color{blue}{\ell \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}}{F}}{F} \]
    7. Applied rewrites83.5%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{PI}\left(\right) \cdot \ell - \frac{\frac{\color{blue}{\ell \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}}{F}}{F} \]

    if 2.4e14 < l

    1. Initial program 63.6%

      \[\mathsf{PI}\left(\right) \cdot \ell - \frac{1}{F \cdot F} \cdot \tan \left(\mathsf{PI}\left(\right) \cdot \ell\right) \]
    2. Add Preprocessing
    3. Taylor expanded in F around inf

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\ell \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right)} \]
    4. Applied rewrites99.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\ell \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right)} \]
  3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
  4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 5: 92.9% accurate, 3.7× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} l\_m = \left|\ell\right| \\ l\_s = \mathsf{copysign}\left(1, \ell\right) \\ \begin{array}{l} t_0 := l\_m \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right)\\ l\_s \cdot \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;l\_m \leq 2.4 \cdot 10^{+14}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{PI}\left(\right) \cdot l\_m - \frac{t\_0}{F \cdot F}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_0\\ \end{array} \end{array} \end{array} \]
l\_m = (fabs.f64 l)
l\_s = (copysign.f64 #s(literal 1 binary64) l)
(FPCore (l_s F l_m)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_0 (* l_m (PI))))
   (* l_s (if (<= l_m 2.4e+14) (- (* (PI) l_m) (/ t_0 (* F F))) t_0))))
\begin{array}{l}
l\_m = \left|\ell\right|
\\
l\_s = \mathsf{copysign}\left(1, \ell\right)

\\
\begin{array}{l}
t_0 := l\_m \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right)\\
l\_s \cdot \begin{array}{l}
\mathbf{if}\;l\_m \leq 2.4 \cdot 10^{+14}:\\
\;\;\;\;\mathsf{PI}\left(\right) \cdot l\_m - \frac{t\_0}{F \cdot F}\\

\mathbf{else}:\\
\;\;\;\;t\_0\\


\end{array}
\end{array}
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Split input into 2 regimes
  2. if l < 2.4e14

    1. Initial program 78.8%

      \[\mathsf{PI}\left(\right) \cdot \ell - \frac{1}{F \cdot F} \cdot \tan \left(\mathsf{PI}\left(\right) \cdot \ell\right) \]
    2. Add Preprocessing
    3. Taylor expanded in l around 0

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{PI}\left(\right) \cdot \ell - \frac{1}{F \cdot F} \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\ell \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right)\right)} \]
    4. Applied rewrites75.3%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{PI}\left(\right) \cdot \ell - \frac{1}{F \cdot F} \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\ell \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right)\right)} \]
    5. Applied rewrites75.6%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{PI}\left(\right) \cdot \ell - \color{blue}{\frac{1 \cdot \left(\ell \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right)\right)}{F \cdot F}} \]

    if 2.4e14 < l

    1. Initial program 63.6%

      \[\mathsf{PI}\left(\right) \cdot \ell - \frac{1}{F \cdot F} \cdot \tan \left(\mathsf{PI}\left(\right) \cdot \ell\right) \]
    2. Add Preprocessing
    3. Taylor expanded in F around inf

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\ell \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right)} \]
    4. Applied rewrites99.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\ell \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right)} \]
  3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
  4. Final simplification81.9%

    \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\ell \leq 2.4 \cdot 10^{+14}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{PI}\left(\right) \cdot \ell - \frac{\ell \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{F \cdot F}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\ell \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right)\\ \end{array} \]
  5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 6: 92.5% accurate, 3.7× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} l\_m = \left|\ell\right| \\ l\_s = \mathsf{copysign}\left(1, \ell\right) \\ l\_s \cdot \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;l\_m \leq 2.4 \cdot 10^{+14}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{PI}\left(\right) \cdot l\_m - l\_m \cdot \frac{\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{F \cdot F}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;l\_m \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]
l\_m = (fabs.f64 l)
l\_s = (copysign.f64 #s(literal 1 binary64) l)
(FPCore (l_s F l_m)
 :precision binary64
 (*
  l_s
  (if (<= l_m 2.4e+14)
    (- (* (PI) l_m) (* l_m (/ (PI) (* F F))))
    (* l_m (PI)))))
\begin{array}{l}
l\_m = \left|\ell\right|
\\
l\_s = \mathsf{copysign}\left(1, \ell\right)

\\
l\_s \cdot \begin{array}{l}
\mathbf{if}\;l\_m \leq 2.4 \cdot 10^{+14}:\\
\;\;\;\;\mathsf{PI}\left(\right) \cdot l\_m - l\_m \cdot \frac{\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{F \cdot F}\\

\mathbf{else}:\\
\;\;\;\;l\_m \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right)\\


\end{array}
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Split input into 2 regimes
  2. if l < 2.4e14

    1. Initial program 78.8%

      \[\mathsf{PI}\left(\right) \cdot \ell - \frac{1}{F \cdot F} \cdot \tan \left(\mathsf{PI}\left(\right) \cdot \ell\right) \]
    2. Add Preprocessing
    3. Taylor expanded in l around 0

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{PI}\left(\right) \cdot \ell - \color{blue}{\frac{\ell \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{{F}^{2}}} \]
    4. Applied rewrites75.8%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{PI}\left(\right) \cdot \ell - \color{blue}{\ell \cdot \frac{\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{F \cdot F}} \]

    if 2.4e14 < l

    1. Initial program 63.6%

      \[\mathsf{PI}\left(\right) \cdot \ell - \frac{1}{F \cdot F} \cdot \tan \left(\mathsf{PI}\left(\right) \cdot \ell\right) \]
    2. Add Preprocessing
    3. Taylor expanded in F around inf

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\ell \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right)} \]
    4. Applied rewrites99.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\ell \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right)} \]
  3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
  4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 7: 92.5% accurate, 4.4× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} l\_m = \left|\ell\right| \\ l\_s = \mathsf{copysign}\left(1, \ell\right) \\ l\_s \cdot \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;l\_m \leq 2.4 \cdot 10^{+14}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(\mathsf{PI}\left(\right) - \frac{\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{F \cdot F}\right) \cdot l\_m\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;l\_m \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]
l\_m = (fabs.f64 l)
l\_s = (copysign.f64 #s(literal 1 binary64) l)
(FPCore (l_s F l_m)
 :precision binary64
 (* l_s (if (<= l_m 2.4e+14) (* (- (PI) (/ (PI) (* F F))) l_m) (* l_m (PI)))))
\begin{array}{l}
l\_m = \left|\ell\right|
\\
l\_s = \mathsf{copysign}\left(1, \ell\right)

\\
l\_s \cdot \begin{array}{l}
\mathbf{if}\;l\_m \leq 2.4 \cdot 10^{+14}:\\
\;\;\;\;\left(\mathsf{PI}\left(\right) - \frac{\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{F \cdot F}\right) \cdot l\_m\\

\mathbf{else}:\\
\;\;\;\;l\_m \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right)\\


\end{array}
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Split input into 2 regimes
  2. if l < 2.4e14

    1. Initial program 78.8%

      \[\mathsf{PI}\left(\right) \cdot \ell - \frac{1}{F \cdot F} \cdot \tan \left(\mathsf{PI}\left(\right) \cdot \ell\right) \]
    2. Add Preprocessing
    3. Taylor expanded in l around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\ell \cdot \left(\mathsf{PI}\left(\right) - \frac{\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{{F}^{2}}\right)} \]
    4. Applied rewrites75.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\mathsf{PI}\left(\right) - \frac{\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{F \cdot F}\right) \cdot \ell} \]

    if 2.4e14 < l

    1. Initial program 63.6%

      \[\mathsf{PI}\left(\right) \cdot \ell - \frac{1}{F \cdot F} \cdot \tan \left(\mathsf{PI}\left(\right) \cdot \ell\right) \]
    2. Add Preprocessing
    3. Taylor expanded in F around inf

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\ell \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right)} \]
    4. Applied rewrites99.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\ell \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right)} \]
  3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
  4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 8: 73.5% accurate, 22.5× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} l\_m = \left|\ell\right| \\ l\_s = \mathsf{copysign}\left(1, \ell\right) \\ l\_s \cdot \left(l\_m \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right)\right) \end{array} \]
l\_m = (fabs.f64 l)
l\_s = (copysign.f64 #s(literal 1 binary64) l)
(FPCore (l_s F l_m) :precision binary64 (* l_s (* l_m (PI))))
\begin{array}{l}
l\_m = \left|\ell\right|
\\
l\_s = \mathsf{copysign}\left(1, \ell\right)

\\
l\_s \cdot \left(l\_m \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right)\right)
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Initial program 74.8%

    \[\mathsf{PI}\left(\right) \cdot \ell - \frac{1}{F \cdot F} \cdot \tan \left(\mathsf{PI}\left(\right) \cdot \ell\right) \]
  2. Add Preprocessing
  3. Taylor expanded in F around inf

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\ell \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right)} \]
  4. Applied rewrites74.6%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\ell \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right)} \]
  5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 9: 3.1% accurate, 135.0× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} l\_m = \left|\ell\right| \\ l\_s = \mathsf{copysign}\left(1, \ell\right) \\ l\_s \cdot 0 \end{array} \]
l\_m = (fabs.f64 l)
l\_s = (copysign.f64 #s(literal 1 binary64) l)
(FPCore (l_s F l_m) :precision binary64 (* l_s 0.0))
l\_m = fabs(l);
l\_s = copysign(1.0, l);
double code(double l_s, double F, double l_m) {
	return l_s * 0.0;
}
l\_m =     private
l\_s =     private
module fmin_fmax_functions
    implicit none
    private
    public fmax
    public fmin

    interface fmax
        module procedure fmax88
        module procedure fmax44
        module procedure fmax84
        module procedure fmax48
    end interface
    interface fmin
        module procedure fmin88
        module procedure fmin44
        module procedure fmin84
        module procedure fmin48
    end interface
contains
    real(8) function fmax88(x, y) result (res)
        real(8), intent (in) :: x
        real(8), intent (in) :: y
        res = merge(y, merge(x, max(x, y), y /= y), x /= x)
    end function
    real(4) function fmax44(x, y) result (res)
        real(4), intent (in) :: x
        real(4), intent (in) :: y
        res = merge(y, merge(x, max(x, y), y /= y), x /= x)
    end function
    real(8) function fmax84(x, y) result(res)
        real(8), intent (in) :: x
        real(4), intent (in) :: y
        res = merge(dble(y), merge(x, max(x, dble(y)), y /= y), x /= x)
    end function
    real(8) function fmax48(x, y) result(res)
        real(4), intent (in) :: x
        real(8), intent (in) :: y
        res = merge(y, merge(dble(x), max(dble(x), y), y /= y), x /= x)
    end function
    real(8) function fmin88(x, y) result (res)
        real(8), intent (in) :: x
        real(8), intent (in) :: y
        res = merge(y, merge(x, min(x, y), y /= y), x /= x)
    end function
    real(4) function fmin44(x, y) result (res)
        real(4), intent (in) :: x
        real(4), intent (in) :: y
        res = merge(y, merge(x, min(x, y), y /= y), x /= x)
    end function
    real(8) function fmin84(x, y) result(res)
        real(8), intent (in) :: x
        real(4), intent (in) :: y
        res = merge(dble(y), merge(x, min(x, dble(y)), y /= y), x /= x)
    end function
    real(8) function fmin48(x, y) result(res)
        real(4), intent (in) :: x
        real(8), intent (in) :: y
        res = merge(y, merge(dble(x), min(dble(x), y), y /= y), x /= x)
    end function
end module

real(8) function code(l_s, f, l_m)
use fmin_fmax_functions
    real(8), intent (in) :: l_s
    real(8), intent (in) :: f
    real(8), intent (in) :: l_m
    code = l_s * 0.0d0
end function
l\_m = Math.abs(l);
l\_s = Math.copySign(1.0, l);
public static double code(double l_s, double F, double l_m) {
	return l_s * 0.0;
}
l\_m = math.fabs(l)
l\_s = math.copysign(1.0, l)
def code(l_s, F, l_m):
	return l_s * 0.0
l\_m = abs(l)
l\_s = copysign(1.0, l)
function code(l_s, F, l_m)
	return Float64(l_s * 0.0)
end
l\_m = abs(l);
l\_s = sign(l) * abs(1.0);
function tmp = code(l_s, F, l_m)
	tmp = l_s * 0.0;
end
l\_m = N[Abs[l], $MachinePrecision]
l\_s = N[With[{TMP1 = Abs[1.0], TMP2 = Sign[l]}, TMP1 * If[TMP2 == 0, 1, TMP2]], $MachinePrecision]
code[l$95$s_, F_, l$95$m_] := N[(l$95$s * 0.0), $MachinePrecision]
\begin{array}{l}
l\_m = \left|\ell\right|
\\
l\_s = \mathsf{copysign}\left(1, \ell\right)

\\
l\_s \cdot 0
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Initial program 74.8%

    \[\mathsf{PI}\left(\right) \cdot \ell - \frac{1}{F \cdot F} \cdot \tan \left(\mathsf{PI}\left(\right) \cdot \ell\right) \]
  2. Add Preprocessing
  3. Applied rewrites55.3%

    \[\leadsto \mathsf{PI}\left(\right) \cdot \ell - \frac{1}{F \cdot F} \cdot \color{blue}{\tan \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(\ell, \mathsf{PI}\left(\right), \mathsf{PI}\left(\right)\right)\right)} \]
  4. Taylor expanded in l around 0

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot \frac{\sin \mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{{F}^{2} \cdot \cos \mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}} \]
  5. Applied rewrites2.5%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{0}{F \cdot F}} \]
  6. Taylor expanded in F around 0

    \[\leadsto 0 \]
  7. Applied rewrites3.0%

    \[\leadsto 0 \]
  8. Add Preprocessing

Reproduce

?
herbie shell --seed 2025042 -o generate:proofs
(FPCore (F l)
  :name "VandenBroeck and Keller, Equation (6)"
  :precision binary64
  (- (* (PI) l) (* (/ 1.0 (* F F)) (tan (* (PI) l)))))