Equirectangular approximation to distance on a great circle

Percentage Accurate: 59.3% → 90.6%

Time: 8.9s

Alternatives: 15

Speedup: 8.5×

• 30.6% of points produce a very large (infinite) output. You may want to add a precondition.

Specification

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_0 := \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\\ R \cdot \sqrt{t\_0 \cdot t\_0 + \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \cdot \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (R lambda1 lambda2 phi1 phi2)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_0 (* (- lambda1 lambda2) (cos (/ (+ phi1 phi2) 2.0)))))
   (* R (sqrt (+ (* t_0 t_0) (* (- phi1 phi2) (- phi1 phi2)))))))

C

double code(double R, double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	double t_0 = (lambda1 - lambda2) * cos(((phi1 + phi2) / 2.0));
	return R * sqrt(((t_0 * t_0) + ((phi1 - phi2) * (phi1 - phi2))));
}

Fortran

module fmin_fmax_functions
    implicit none
    private
    public fmax
    public fmin

    interface fmax
        module procedure fmax88
        module procedure fmax44
        module procedure fmax84
        module procedure fmax48
    end interface
    interface fmin
        module procedure fmin88
        module procedure fmin44
        module procedure fmin84
        module procedure fmin48
    end interface
contains
    real(8) function fmax88(x, y) result (res)
        real(8), intent (in) :: x
        real(8), intent (in) :: y
        res = merge(y, merge(x, max(x, y), y /= y), x /= x)
    end function
    real(4) function fmax44(x, y) result (res)
        real(4), intent (in) :: x
        real(4), intent (in) :: y
        res = merge(y, merge(x, max(x, y), y /= y), x /= x)
    end function
    real(8) function fmax84(x, y) result(res)
        real(8), intent (in) :: x
        real(4), intent (in) :: y
        res = merge(dble(y), merge(x, max(x, dble(y)), y /= y), x /= x)
    end function
    real(8) function fmax48(x, y) result(res)
        real(4), intent (in) :: x
        real(8), intent (in) :: y
        res = merge(y, merge(dble(x), max(dble(x), y), y /= y), x /= x)
    end function
    real(8) function fmin88(x, y) result (res)
        real(8), intent (in) :: x
        real(8), intent (in) :: y
        res = merge(y, merge(x, min(x, y), y /= y), x /= x)
    end function
    real(4) function fmin44(x, y) result (res)
        real(4), intent (in) :: x
        real(4), intent (in) :: y
        res = merge(y, merge(x, min(x, y), y /= y), x /= x)
    end function
    real(8) function fmin84(x, y) result(res)
        real(8), intent (in) :: x
        real(4), intent (in) :: y
        res = merge(dble(y), merge(x, min(x, dble(y)), y /= y), x /= x)
    end function
    real(8) function fmin48(x, y) result(res)
        real(4), intent (in) :: x
        real(8), intent (in) :: y
        res = merge(y, merge(dble(x), min(dble(x), y), y /= y), x /= x)
    end function
end module

real(8) function code(r, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
use fmin_fmax_functions
    real(8), intent (in) :: r
    real(8), intent (in) :: lambda1
    real(8), intent (in) :: lambda2
    real(8), intent (in) :: phi1
    real(8), intent (in) :: phi2
    real(8) :: t_0
    t_0 = (lambda1 - lambda2) * cos(((phi1 + phi2) / 2.0d0))
    code = r * sqrt(((t_0 * t_0) + ((phi1 - phi2) * (phi1 - phi2))))
end function

Java

public static double code(double R, double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	double t_0 = (lambda1 - lambda2) * Math.cos(((phi1 + phi2) / 2.0));
	return R * Math.sqrt(((t_0 * t_0) + ((phi1 - phi2) * (phi1 - phi2))));
}

Python

def code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2):
	t_0 = (lambda1 - lambda2) * math.cos(((phi1 + phi2) / 2.0))
	return R * math.sqrt(((t_0 * t_0) + ((phi1 - phi2) * (phi1 - phi2))))

Julia

function code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	t_0 = Float64(Float64(lambda1 - lambda2) * cos(Float64(Float64(phi1 + phi2) / 2.0)))
	return Float64(R * sqrt(Float64(Float64(t_0 * t_0) + Float64(Float64(phi1 - phi2) * Float64(phi1 - phi2)))))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	t_0 = (lambda1 - lambda2) * cos(((phi1 + phi2) / 2.0));
	tmp = R * sqrt(((t_0 * t_0) + ((phi1 - phi2) * (phi1 - phi2))));
end

Wolfram

code[R_, lambda1_, lambda2_, phi1_, phi2_] := Block[{t$95$0 = N[(N[(lambda1 - lambda2), $MachinePrecision] * N[Cos[N[(N[(phi1 + phi2), $MachinePrecision] / 2.0), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, N[(R * N[Sqrt[N[(N[(t$95$0 * t$95$0), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(phi1 - phi2), $MachinePrecision] * N[(phi1 - phi2), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Initial Program: 59.3% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_0 := \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\\ R \cdot \sqrt{t\_0 \cdot t\_0 + \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \cdot \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (R lambda1 lambda2 phi1 phi2)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_0 (* (- lambda1 lambda2) (cos (/ (+ phi1 phi2) 2.0)))))
   (* R (sqrt (+ (* t_0 t_0) (* (- phi1 phi2) (- phi1 phi2)))))))

C

double code(double R, double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	double t_0 = (lambda1 - lambda2) * cos(((phi1 + phi2) / 2.0));
	return R * sqrt(((t_0 * t_0) + ((phi1 - phi2) * (phi1 - phi2))));
}

Fortran

module fmin_fmax_functions
    implicit none
    private
    public fmax
    public fmin

    interface fmax
        module procedure fmax88
        module procedure fmax44
        module procedure fmax84
        module procedure fmax48
    end interface
    interface fmin
        module procedure fmin88
        module procedure fmin44
        module procedure fmin84
        module procedure fmin48
    end interface
contains
    real(8) function fmax88(x, y) result (res)
        real(8), intent (in) :: x
        real(8), intent (in) :: y
        res = merge(y, merge(x, max(x, y), y /= y), x /= x)
    end function
    real(4) function fmax44(x, y) result (res)
        real(4), intent (in) :: x
        real(4), intent (in) :: y
        res = merge(y, merge(x, max(x, y), y /= y), x /= x)
    end function
    real(8) function fmax84(x, y) result(res)
        real(8), intent (in) :: x
        real(4), intent (in) :: y
        res = merge(dble(y), merge(x, max(x, dble(y)), y /= y), x /= x)
    end function
    real(8) function fmax48(x, y) result(res)
        real(4), intent (in) :: x
        real(8), intent (in) :: y
        res = merge(y, merge(dble(x), max(dble(x), y), y /= y), x /= x)
    end function
    real(8) function fmin88(x, y) result (res)
        real(8), intent (in) :: x
        real(8), intent (in) :: y
        res = merge(y, merge(x, min(x, y), y /= y), x /= x)
    end function
    real(4) function fmin44(x, y) result (res)
        real(4), intent (in) :: x
        real(4), intent (in) :: y
        res = merge(y, merge(x, min(x, y), y /= y), x /= x)
    end function
    real(8) function fmin84(x, y) result(res)
        real(8), intent (in) :: x
        real(4), intent (in) :: y
        res = merge(dble(y), merge(x, min(x, dble(y)), y /= y), x /= x)
    end function
    real(8) function fmin48(x, y) result(res)
        real(4), intent (in) :: x
        real(8), intent (in) :: y
        res = merge(y, merge(dble(x), min(dble(x), y), y /= y), x /= x)
    end function
end module

real(8) function code(r, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
use fmin_fmax_functions
    real(8), intent (in) :: r
    real(8), intent (in) :: lambda1
    real(8), intent (in) :: lambda2
    real(8), intent (in) :: phi1
    real(8), intent (in) :: phi2
    real(8) :: t_0
    t_0 = (lambda1 - lambda2) * cos(((phi1 + phi2) / 2.0d0))
    code = r * sqrt(((t_0 * t_0) + ((phi1 - phi2) * (phi1 - phi2))))
end function

Java

public static double code(double R, double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	double t_0 = (lambda1 - lambda2) * Math.cos(((phi1 + phi2) / 2.0));
	return R * Math.sqrt(((t_0 * t_0) + ((phi1 - phi2) * (phi1 - phi2))));
}

Python

def code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2):
	t_0 = (lambda1 - lambda2) * math.cos(((phi1 + phi2) / 2.0))
	return R * math.sqrt(((t_0 * t_0) + ((phi1 - phi2) * (phi1 - phi2))))

Julia

function code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	t_0 = Float64(Float64(lambda1 - lambda2) * cos(Float64(Float64(phi1 + phi2) / 2.0)))
	return Float64(R * sqrt(Float64(Float64(t_0 * t_0) + Float64(Float64(phi1 - phi2) * Float64(phi1 - phi2)))))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	t_0 = (lambda1 - lambda2) * cos(((phi1 + phi2) / 2.0));
	tmp = R * sqrt(((t_0 * t_0) + ((phi1 - phi2) * (phi1 - phi2))));
end

Wolfram

code[R_, lambda1_, lambda2_, phi1_, phi2_] := Block[{t$95$0 = N[(N[(lambda1 - lambda2), $MachinePrecision] * N[Cos[N[(N[(phi1 + phi2), $MachinePrecision] / 2.0), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, N[(R * N[Sqrt[N[(N[(t$95$0 * t$95$0), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(phi1 - phi2), $MachinePrecision] * N[(phi1 - phi2), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Alternative 1: 90.6% accurate, 1.2× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} [R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2] = \mathsf{sort}([R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2])\\ \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\phi_1 \leq -1 \cdot 10^{-34}:\\ \;\;\;\;R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\cos \left(-0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right) \cdot \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right), \phi_1\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\cos \left(-0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right) \cdot \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right), \phi_2\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

NOTE: R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, and phi2 should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
(FPCore (R lambda1 lambda2 phi1 phi2)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= phi1 -1e-34)
   (* R (hypot (* (cos (* -0.5 phi1)) (- lambda1 lambda2)) phi1))
   (* R (hypot (* (cos (* -0.5 phi2)) (- lambda1 lambda2)) phi2))))

C

assert(R < lambda1 && lambda1 < lambda2 && lambda2 < phi1 && phi1 < phi2);
double code(double R, double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	double tmp;
	if (phi1 <= -1e-34) {
		tmp = R * hypot((cos((-0.5 * phi1)) * (lambda1 - lambda2)), phi1);
	} else {
		tmp = R * hypot((cos((-0.5 * phi2)) * (lambda1 - lambda2)), phi2);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Java

assert R < lambda1 && lambda1 < lambda2 && lambda2 < phi1 && phi1 < phi2;
public static double code(double R, double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	double tmp;
	if (phi1 <= -1e-34) {
		tmp = R * Math.hypot((Math.cos((-0.5 * phi1)) * (lambda1 - lambda2)), phi1);
	} else {
		tmp = R * Math.hypot((Math.cos((-0.5 * phi2)) * (lambda1 - lambda2)), phi2);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

[R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2] = sort([R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2])
def code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2):
	tmp = 0
	if phi1 <= -1e-34:
		tmp = R * math.hypot((math.cos((-0.5 * phi1)) * (lambda1 - lambda2)), phi1)
	else:
		tmp = R * math.hypot((math.cos((-0.5 * phi2)) * (lambda1 - lambda2)), phi2)
	return tmp

Julia

R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2 = sort([R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2])
function code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (phi1 <= -1e-34)
		tmp = Float64(R * hypot(Float64(cos(Float64(-0.5 * phi1)) * Float64(lambda1 - lambda2)), phi1));
	else
		tmp = Float64(R * hypot(Float64(cos(Float64(-0.5 * phi2)) * Float64(lambda1 - lambda2)), phi2));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2 = num2cell(sort([R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2])){:}
function tmp_2 = code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (phi1 <= -1e-34)
		tmp = R * hypot((cos((-0.5 * phi1)) * (lambda1 - lambda2)), phi1);
	else
		tmp = R * hypot((cos((-0.5 * phi2)) * (lambda1 - lambda2)), phi2);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

NOTE: R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, and phi2 should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
code[R_, lambda1_, lambda2_, phi1_, phi2_] := If[LessEqual[phi1, -1e-34], N[(R * N[Sqrt[N[(N[Cos[N[(-0.5 * phi1), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] * N[(lambda1 - lambda2), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] ^ 2 + phi1 ^ 2], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(R * N[Sqrt[N[(N[Cos[N[(-0.5 * phi2), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] * N[(lambda1 - lambda2), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] ^ 2 + phi2 ^ 2], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if phi1 < -9.99999999999999928e-35

   1. Initial program 58.0%

      \[R \cdot \sqrt{\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) \cdot \left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) + \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \cdot \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in phi2 around 0

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\sqrt{{\cos \left(\frac{1}{2} \cdot \phi_1\right)}^{2} \cdot {\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)}^{2} + {\phi_1}^{2}}} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

   5. Applied rewrites 83.7%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(\cos \left(-0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right) \cdot \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right), \phi_1\right)} \]

   if -9.99999999999999928e-35 < phi1

   1. Initial program 64.6%

      \[R \cdot \sqrt{\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) \cdot \left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) + \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \cdot \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in phi1 around 0

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\sqrt{{\cos \left(\frac{1}{2} \cdot \phi_2\right)}^{2} \cdot {\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)}^{2} + {\phi_2}^{2}}} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

   5. Applied rewrites 82.6%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(\cos \left(-0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right) \cdot \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right), \phi_2\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 2: 81.0% accurate, 1.2× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} [R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2] = \mathsf{sort}([R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2])\\ \\ \begin{array}{l} t_0 := \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right)\\ \mathbf{if}\;\phi_1 \leq -1.18 \cdot 10^{+107}:\\ \;\;\;\;R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(t\_0 \cdot \lambda_1, \phi_1\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;\phi_1 \leq -215000:\\ \;\;\;\;R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(t\_0 \cdot \lambda_2, \phi_1\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2, \phi_2\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

NOTE: R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, and phi2 should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
(FPCore (R lambda1 lambda2 phi1 phi2)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_0 (cos (* 0.5 phi1))))
   (if (<= phi1 -1.18e+107)
     (* R (hypot (* t_0 lambda1) phi1))
     (if (<= phi1 -215000.0)
       (* R (hypot (* t_0 lambda2) phi1))
       (* R (hypot (- lambda1 lambda2) phi2))))))

C

assert(R < lambda1 && lambda1 < lambda2 && lambda2 < phi1 && phi1 < phi2);
double code(double R, double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	double t_0 = cos((0.5 * phi1));
	double tmp;
	if (phi1 <= -1.18e+107) {
		tmp = R * hypot((t_0 * lambda1), phi1);
	} else if (phi1 <= -215000.0) {
		tmp = R * hypot((t_0 * lambda2), phi1);
	} else {
		tmp = R * hypot((lambda1 - lambda2), phi2);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Java

assert R < lambda1 && lambda1 < lambda2 && lambda2 < phi1 && phi1 < phi2;
public static double code(double R, double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	double t_0 = Math.cos((0.5 * phi1));
	double tmp;
	if (phi1 <= -1.18e+107) {
		tmp = R * Math.hypot((t_0 * lambda1), phi1);
	} else if (phi1 <= -215000.0) {
		tmp = R * Math.hypot((t_0 * lambda2), phi1);
	} else {
		tmp = R * Math.hypot((lambda1 - lambda2), phi2);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

[R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2] = sort([R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2])
def code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2):
	t_0 = math.cos((0.5 * phi1))
	tmp = 0
	if phi1 <= -1.18e+107:
		tmp = R * math.hypot((t_0 * lambda1), phi1)
	elif phi1 <= -215000.0:
		tmp = R * math.hypot((t_0 * lambda2), phi1)
	else:
		tmp = R * math.hypot((lambda1 - lambda2), phi2)
	return tmp

Julia

R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2 = sort([R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2])
function code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	t_0 = cos(Float64(0.5 * phi1))
	tmp = 0.0
	if (phi1 <= -1.18e+107)
		tmp = Float64(R * hypot(Float64(t_0 * lambda1), phi1));
	elseif (phi1 <= -215000.0)
		tmp = Float64(R * hypot(Float64(t_0 * lambda2), phi1));
	else
		tmp = Float64(R * hypot(Float64(lambda1 - lambda2), phi2));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2 = num2cell(sort([R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2])){:}
function tmp_2 = code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	t_0 = cos((0.5 * phi1));
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (phi1 <= -1.18e+107)
		tmp = R * hypot((t_0 * lambda1), phi1);
	elseif (phi1 <= -215000.0)
		tmp = R * hypot((t_0 * lambda2), phi1);
	else
		tmp = R * hypot((lambda1 - lambda2), phi2);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

NOTE: R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, and phi2 should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
code[R_, lambda1_, lambda2_, phi1_, phi2_] := Block[{t$95$0 = N[Cos[N[(0.5 * phi1), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[phi1, -1.18e+107], N[(R * N[Sqrt[N[(t$95$0 * lambda1), $MachinePrecision] ^ 2 + phi1 ^ 2], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[phi1, -215000.0], N[(R * N[Sqrt[N[(t$95$0 * lambda2), $MachinePrecision] ^ 2 + phi1 ^ 2], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(R * N[Sqrt[N[(lambda1 - lambda2), $MachinePrecision] ^ 2 + phi2 ^ 2], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if phi1 < -1.18000000000000005e107

   1. Initial program 45.1%

      \[R \cdot \sqrt{\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) \cdot \left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) + \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \cdot \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in phi2 around 0

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\sqrt{{\cos \left(\frac{1}{2} \cdot \phi_1\right)}^{2} \cdot {\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)}^{2} + {\phi_1}^{2}}} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

   5. Applied rewrites 87.6%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(\cos \left(-0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right) \cdot \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right), \phi_1\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in lambda1 around inf

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\lambda_1 \cdot \cos \left(\frac{-1}{2} \cdot \phi_1\right), \phi_1\right) \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

   8. Applied rewrites 82.0%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right) \cdot \lambda_1, \phi_1\right) \]

   if -1.18000000000000005e107 < phi1 < -215000

   1. Initial program 72.2%

      \[R \cdot \sqrt{\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) \cdot \left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) + \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \cdot \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in phi2 around 0

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\sqrt{{\cos \left(\frac{1}{2} \cdot \phi_1\right)}^{2} \cdot {\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)}^{2} + {\phi_1}^{2}}} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

   5. Applied rewrites 74.0%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(\cos \left(-0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right) \cdot \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right), \phi_1\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in lambda1 around 0

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \sqrt{{\lambda_2}^{2} \cdot {\cos \left(\frac{-1}{2} \cdot \phi_1\right)}^{2} + {\phi_1}^{2}} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

   8. Applied rewrites 68.5%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right) \cdot \lambda_2, \color{blue}{\phi_1}\right) \]

   if -215000 < phi1

   1. Initial program 65.9%

      \[R \cdot \sqrt{\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) \cdot \left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) + \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \cdot \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in phi1 around 0

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\sqrt{{\cos \left(\frac{1}{2} \cdot \phi_2\right)}^{2} \cdot {\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)}^{2} + {\phi_2}^{2}}} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

   5. Applied rewrites 82.6%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(\cos \left(-0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right) \cdot \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right), \phi_2\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in phi2 around 0

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2, \phi_2\right) \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

   8. Applied rewrites 77.1%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2, \phi_2\right) \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.
4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 3: 86.0% accurate, 1.2× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} [R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2] = \mathsf{sort}([R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2])\\ \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\phi_2 \leq 5.8 \cdot 10^{+68}:\\ \;\;\;\;R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\cos \left(-0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right) \cdot \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right), \phi_1\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right) \cdot \lambda_1, \phi_2\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

NOTE: R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, and phi2 should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
(FPCore (R lambda1 lambda2 phi1 phi2)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= phi2 5.8e+68)
   (* R (hypot (* (cos (* -0.5 phi1)) (- lambda1 lambda2)) phi1))
   (* R (hypot (* (cos (* 0.5 phi2)) lambda1) phi2))))

C

assert(R < lambda1 && lambda1 < lambda2 && lambda2 < phi1 && phi1 < phi2);
double code(double R, double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	double tmp;
	if (phi2 <= 5.8e+68) {
		tmp = R * hypot((cos((-0.5 * phi1)) * (lambda1 - lambda2)), phi1);
	} else {
		tmp = R * hypot((cos((0.5 * phi2)) * lambda1), phi2);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Java

assert R < lambda1 && lambda1 < lambda2 && lambda2 < phi1 && phi1 < phi2;
public static double code(double R, double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	double tmp;
	if (phi2 <= 5.8e+68) {
		tmp = R * Math.hypot((Math.cos((-0.5 * phi1)) * (lambda1 - lambda2)), phi1);
	} else {
		tmp = R * Math.hypot((Math.cos((0.5 * phi2)) * lambda1), phi2);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

[R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2] = sort([R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2])
def code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2):
	tmp = 0
	if phi2 <= 5.8e+68:
		tmp = R * math.hypot((math.cos((-0.5 * phi1)) * (lambda1 - lambda2)), phi1)
	else:
		tmp = R * math.hypot((math.cos((0.5 * phi2)) * lambda1), phi2)
	return tmp

Julia

R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2 = sort([R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2])
function code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (phi2 <= 5.8e+68)
		tmp = Float64(R * hypot(Float64(cos(Float64(-0.5 * phi1)) * Float64(lambda1 - lambda2)), phi1));
	else
		tmp = Float64(R * hypot(Float64(cos(Float64(0.5 * phi2)) * lambda1), phi2));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2 = num2cell(sort([R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2])){:}
function tmp_2 = code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (phi2 <= 5.8e+68)
		tmp = R * hypot((cos((-0.5 * phi1)) * (lambda1 - lambda2)), phi1);
	else
		tmp = R * hypot((cos((0.5 * phi2)) * lambda1), phi2);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

NOTE: R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, and phi2 should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
code[R_, lambda1_, lambda2_, phi1_, phi2_] := If[LessEqual[phi2, 5.8e+68], N[(R * N[Sqrt[N[(N[Cos[N[(-0.5 * phi1), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] * N[(lambda1 - lambda2), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] ^ 2 + phi1 ^ 2], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(R * N[Sqrt[N[(N[Cos[N[(0.5 * phi2), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] * lambda1), $MachinePrecision] ^ 2 + phi2 ^ 2], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if phi2 < 5.80000000000000023e68

   1. Initial program 64.1%

      \[R \cdot \sqrt{\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) \cdot \left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) + \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \cdot \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in phi2 around 0

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\sqrt{{\cos \left(\frac{1}{2} \cdot \phi_1\right)}^{2} \cdot {\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)}^{2} + {\phi_1}^{2}}} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

   5. Applied rewrites 84.2%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(\cos \left(-0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right) \cdot \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right), \phi_1\right)} \]

   if 5.80000000000000023e68 < phi2

   1. Initial program 56.5%

      \[R \cdot \sqrt{\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) \cdot \left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) + \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \cdot \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in phi1 around 0

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\sqrt{{\cos \left(\frac{1}{2} \cdot \phi_2\right)}^{2} \cdot {\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)}^{2} + {\phi_2}^{2}}} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

   5. Applied rewrites 82.2%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(\cos \left(-0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right) \cdot \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right), \phi_2\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in lambda1 around inf

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\lambda_1 \cdot \cos \left(\frac{-1}{2} \cdot \phi_2\right), \phi_2\right) \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

   8. Applied rewrites 79.1%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right) \cdot \lambda_1, \phi_2\right) \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 4: 80.6% accurate, 1.3× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} [R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2] = \mathsf{sort}([R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2])\\ \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\phi_2 \leq 5.8 \cdot 10^{+68}:\\ \;\;\;\;R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2, \phi_1\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right) \cdot \lambda_1, \phi_2\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

NOTE: R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, and phi2 should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
(FPCore (R lambda1 lambda2 phi1 phi2)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= phi2 5.8e+68)
   (* R (hypot (- lambda1 lambda2) phi1))
   (* R (hypot (* (cos (* 0.5 phi2)) lambda1) phi2))))

C

assert(R < lambda1 && lambda1 < lambda2 && lambda2 < phi1 && phi1 < phi2);
double code(double R, double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	double tmp;
	if (phi2 <= 5.8e+68) {
		tmp = R * hypot((lambda1 - lambda2), phi1);
	} else {
		tmp = R * hypot((cos((0.5 * phi2)) * lambda1), phi2);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Java

assert R < lambda1 && lambda1 < lambda2 && lambda2 < phi1 && phi1 < phi2;
public static double code(double R, double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	double tmp;
	if (phi2 <= 5.8e+68) {
		tmp = R * Math.hypot((lambda1 - lambda2), phi1);
	} else {
		tmp = R * Math.hypot((Math.cos((0.5 * phi2)) * lambda1), phi2);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

[R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2] = sort([R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2])
def code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2):
	tmp = 0
	if phi2 <= 5.8e+68:
		tmp = R * math.hypot((lambda1 - lambda2), phi1)
	else:
		tmp = R * math.hypot((math.cos((0.5 * phi2)) * lambda1), phi2)
	return tmp

Julia

R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2 = sort([R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2])
function code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (phi2 <= 5.8e+68)
		tmp = Float64(R * hypot(Float64(lambda1 - lambda2), phi1));
	else
		tmp = Float64(R * hypot(Float64(cos(Float64(0.5 * phi2)) * lambda1), phi2));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2 = num2cell(sort([R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2])){:}
function tmp_2 = code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (phi2 <= 5.8e+68)
		tmp = R * hypot((lambda1 - lambda2), phi1);
	else
		tmp = R * hypot((cos((0.5 * phi2)) * lambda1), phi2);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

NOTE: R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, and phi2 should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
code[R_, lambda1_, lambda2_, phi1_, phi2_] := If[LessEqual[phi2, 5.8e+68], N[(R * N[Sqrt[N[(lambda1 - lambda2), $MachinePrecision] ^ 2 + phi1 ^ 2], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(R * N[Sqrt[N[(N[Cos[N[(0.5 * phi2), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] * lambda1), $MachinePrecision] ^ 2 + phi2 ^ 2], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if phi2 < 5.80000000000000023e68

   1. Initial program 64.1%

      \[R \cdot \sqrt{\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) \cdot \left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) + \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \cdot \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in phi2 around 0

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\sqrt{{\cos \left(\frac{1}{2} \cdot \phi_1\right)}^{2} \cdot {\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)}^{2} + {\phi_1}^{2}}} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

   5. Applied rewrites 84.2%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(\cos \left(-0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right) \cdot \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right), \phi_1\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in phi1 around 0

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2, \phi_1\right) \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

   8. Applied rewrites 78.4%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2, \phi_1\right) \]

   if 5.80000000000000023e68 < phi2

   1. Initial program 56.5%

      \[R \cdot \sqrt{\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) \cdot \left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) + \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \cdot \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in phi1 around 0

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\sqrt{{\cos \left(\frac{1}{2} \cdot \phi_2\right)}^{2} \cdot {\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)}^{2} + {\phi_2}^{2}}} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

   5. Applied rewrites 82.2%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(\cos \left(-0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right) \cdot \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right), \phi_2\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in lambda1 around inf

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\lambda_1 \cdot \cos \left(\frac{-1}{2} \cdot \phi_2\right), \phi_2\right) \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

   8. Applied rewrites 79.1%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right) \cdot \lambda_1, \phi_2\right) \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 5: 81.1% accurate, 1.3× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} [R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2] = \mathsf{sort}([R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2])\\ \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\phi_1 \leq -215000:\\ \;\;\;\;R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right) \cdot \lambda_2, \phi_1\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2, \phi_2\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

NOTE: R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, and phi2 should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
(FPCore (R lambda1 lambda2 phi1 phi2)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= phi1 -215000.0)
   (* R (hypot (* (cos (* 0.5 phi1)) lambda2) phi1))
   (* R (hypot (- lambda1 lambda2) phi2))))

C

assert(R < lambda1 && lambda1 < lambda2 && lambda2 < phi1 && phi1 < phi2);
double code(double R, double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	double tmp;
	if (phi1 <= -215000.0) {
		tmp = R * hypot((cos((0.5 * phi1)) * lambda2), phi1);
	} else {
		tmp = R * hypot((lambda1 - lambda2), phi2);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Java

assert R < lambda1 && lambda1 < lambda2 && lambda2 < phi1 && phi1 < phi2;
public static double code(double R, double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	double tmp;
	if (phi1 <= -215000.0) {
		tmp = R * Math.hypot((Math.cos((0.5 * phi1)) * lambda2), phi1);
	} else {
		tmp = R * Math.hypot((lambda1 - lambda2), phi2);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

[R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2] = sort([R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2])
def code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2):
	tmp = 0
	if phi1 <= -215000.0:
		tmp = R * math.hypot((math.cos((0.5 * phi1)) * lambda2), phi1)
	else:
		tmp = R * math.hypot((lambda1 - lambda2), phi2)
	return tmp

Julia

R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2 = sort([R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2])
function code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (phi1 <= -215000.0)
		tmp = Float64(R * hypot(Float64(cos(Float64(0.5 * phi1)) * lambda2), phi1));
	else
		tmp = Float64(R * hypot(Float64(lambda1 - lambda2), phi2));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2 = num2cell(sort([R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2])){:}
function tmp_2 = code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (phi1 <= -215000.0)
		tmp = R * hypot((cos((0.5 * phi1)) * lambda2), phi1);
	else
		tmp = R * hypot((lambda1 - lambda2), phi2);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

NOTE: R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, and phi2 should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
code[R_, lambda1_, lambda2_, phi1_, phi2_] := If[LessEqual[phi1, -215000.0], N[(R * N[Sqrt[N[(N[Cos[N[(0.5 * phi1), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] * lambda2), $MachinePrecision] ^ 2 + phi1 ^ 2], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(R * N[Sqrt[N[(lambda1 - lambda2), $MachinePrecision] ^ 2 + phi2 ^ 2], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if phi1 < -215000

   1. Initial program 53.5%

      \[R \cdot \sqrt{\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) \cdot \left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) + \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \cdot \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in phi2 around 0

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\sqrt{{\cos \left(\frac{1}{2} \cdot \phi_1\right)}^{2} \cdot {\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)}^{2} + {\phi_1}^{2}}} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

   5. Applied rewrites 83.4%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(\cos \left(-0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right) \cdot \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right), \phi_1\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in lambda1 around 0

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \sqrt{{\lambda_2}^{2} \cdot {\cos \left(\frac{-1}{2} \cdot \phi_1\right)}^{2} + {\phi_1}^{2}} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

   8. Applied rewrites 76.2%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right) \cdot \lambda_2, \color{blue}{\phi_1}\right) \]

   if -215000 < phi1

   1. Initial program 65.9%

      \[R \cdot \sqrt{\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) \cdot \left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) + \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \cdot \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in phi1 around 0

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\sqrt{{\cos \left(\frac{1}{2} \cdot \phi_2\right)}^{2} \cdot {\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)}^{2} + {\phi_2}^{2}}} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

   5. Applied rewrites 82.6%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(\cos \left(-0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right) \cdot \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right), \phi_2\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in phi2 around 0

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2, \phi_2\right) \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

   8. Applied rewrites 77.1%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2, \phi_2\right) \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 6: 80.2% accurate, 2.4× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} [R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2] = \mathsf{sort}([R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2])\\ \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\phi_2 \leq 5.2 \cdot 10^{+78}:\\ \;\;\;\;R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2, \phi_1\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2, \phi_2\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

NOTE: R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, and phi2 should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
(FPCore (R lambda1 lambda2 phi1 phi2)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= phi2 5.2e+78)
   (* R (hypot (- lambda1 lambda2) phi1))
   (* R (hypot (- lambda1 lambda2) phi2))))

C

assert(R < lambda1 && lambda1 < lambda2 && lambda2 < phi1 && phi1 < phi2);
double code(double R, double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	double tmp;
	if (phi2 <= 5.2e+78) {
		tmp = R * hypot((lambda1 - lambda2), phi1);
	} else {
		tmp = R * hypot((lambda1 - lambda2), phi2);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Java

assert R < lambda1 && lambda1 < lambda2 && lambda2 < phi1 && phi1 < phi2;
public static double code(double R, double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	double tmp;
	if (phi2 <= 5.2e+78) {
		tmp = R * Math.hypot((lambda1 - lambda2), phi1);
	} else {
		tmp = R * Math.hypot((lambda1 - lambda2), phi2);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

[R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2] = sort([R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2])
def code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2):
	tmp = 0
	if phi2 <= 5.2e+78:
		tmp = R * math.hypot((lambda1 - lambda2), phi1)
	else:
		tmp = R * math.hypot((lambda1 - lambda2), phi2)
	return tmp

Julia

R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2 = sort([R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2])
function code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (phi2 <= 5.2e+78)
		tmp = Float64(R * hypot(Float64(lambda1 - lambda2), phi1));
	else
		tmp = Float64(R * hypot(Float64(lambda1 - lambda2), phi2));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2 = num2cell(sort([R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2])){:}
function tmp_2 = code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (phi2 <= 5.2e+78)
		tmp = R * hypot((lambda1 - lambda2), phi1);
	else
		tmp = R * hypot((lambda1 - lambda2), phi2);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

NOTE: R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, and phi2 should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
code[R_, lambda1_, lambda2_, phi1_, phi2_] := If[LessEqual[phi2, 5.2e+78], N[(R * N[Sqrt[N[(lambda1 - lambda2), $MachinePrecision] ^ 2 + phi1 ^ 2], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(R * N[Sqrt[N[(lambda1 - lambda2), $MachinePrecision] ^ 2 + phi2 ^ 2], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if phi2 < 5.2e78

   1. Initial program 63.8%

      \[R \cdot \sqrt{\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) \cdot \left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) + \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \cdot \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in phi2 around 0

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\sqrt{{\cos \left(\frac{1}{2} \cdot \phi_1\right)}^{2} \cdot {\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)}^{2} + {\phi_1}^{2}}} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

   5. Applied rewrites 83.9%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(\cos \left(-0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right) \cdot \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right), \phi_1\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in phi1 around 0

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2, \phi_1\right) \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

   8. Applied rewrites 78.1%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2, \phi_1\right) \]

   if 5.2e78 < phi2

   1. Initial program 57.7%

      \[R \cdot \sqrt{\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) \cdot \left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) + \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \cdot \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in phi1 around 0

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\sqrt{{\cos \left(\frac{1}{2} \cdot \phi_2\right)}^{2} \cdot {\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)}^{2} + {\phi_2}^{2}}} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

   5. Applied rewrites 83.7%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(\cos \left(-0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right) \cdot \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right), \phi_2\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in phi2 around 0

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2, \phi_2\right) \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

   8. Applied rewrites 82.0%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2, \phi_2\right) \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 7: 79.8% accurate, 2.4× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} [R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2] = \mathsf{sort}([R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2])\\ \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\phi_2 \leq 2.2 \cdot 10^{+83}:\\ \;\;\;\;R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2, \phi_1\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(\left(-\phi_1\right) + \phi_2\right) \cdot R\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

NOTE: R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, and phi2 should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
(FPCore (R lambda1 lambda2 phi1 phi2)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= phi2 2.2e+83)
   (* R (hypot (- lambda1 lambda2) phi1))
   (* (+ (- phi1) phi2) R)))

C

assert(R < lambda1 && lambda1 < lambda2 && lambda2 < phi1 && phi1 < phi2);
double code(double R, double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	double tmp;
	if (phi2 <= 2.2e+83) {
		tmp = R * hypot((lambda1 - lambda2), phi1);
	} else {
		tmp = (-phi1 + phi2) * R;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Java

assert R < lambda1 && lambda1 < lambda2 && lambda2 < phi1 && phi1 < phi2;
public static double code(double R, double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	double tmp;
	if (phi2 <= 2.2e+83) {
		tmp = R * Math.hypot((lambda1 - lambda2), phi1);
	} else {
		tmp = (-phi1 + phi2) * R;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

[R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2] = sort([R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2])
def code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2):
	tmp = 0
	if phi2 <= 2.2e+83:
		tmp = R * math.hypot((lambda1 - lambda2), phi1)
	else:
		tmp = (-phi1 + phi2) * R
	return tmp

Julia

R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2 = sort([R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2])
function code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (phi2 <= 2.2e+83)
		tmp = Float64(R * hypot(Float64(lambda1 - lambda2), phi1));
	else
		tmp = Float64(Float64(Float64(-phi1) + phi2) * R);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2 = num2cell(sort([R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2])){:}
function tmp_2 = code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (phi2 <= 2.2e+83)
		tmp = R * hypot((lambda1 - lambda2), phi1);
	else
		tmp = (-phi1 + phi2) * R;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

NOTE: R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, and phi2 should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
code[R_, lambda1_, lambda2_, phi1_, phi2_] := If[LessEqual[phi2, 2.2e+83], N[(R * N[Sqrt[N[(lambda1 - lambda2), $MachinePrecision] ^ 2 + phi1 ^ 2], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[((-phi1) + phi2), $MachinePrecision] * R), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if phi2 < 2.19999999999999999e83

   1. Initial program 63.6%

      \[R \cdot \sqrt{\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) \cdot \left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) + \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \cdot \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in phi2 around 0

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\sqrt{{\cos \left(\frac{1}{2} \cdot \phi_1\right)}^{2} \cdot {\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)}^{2} + {\phi_1}^{2}}} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

   5. Applied rewrites 83.6%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(\cos \left(-0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right) \cdot \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right), \phi_1\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in phi1 around 0

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2, \phi_1\right) \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

   8. Applied rewrites 77.8%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2, \phi_1\right) \]

   if 2.19999999999999999e83 < phi2

   1. Initial program 59.0%

      \[R \cdot \sqrt{\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) \cdot \left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) + \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \cdot \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in phi1 around -inf

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot \left(\phi_1 \cdot \left(R + -1 \cdot \frac{R \cdot \phi_2}{\phi_1}\right)\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

   5. Applied rewrites 67.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-\phi_1\right) \cdot \mathsf{fma}\left(-R, \frac{\phi_2}{\phi_1}, R\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in phi1 around 0

      \[\leadsto \left(-\phi_1\right) \cdot \frac{-1 \cdot \left(R \cdot \phi_2\right) + R \cdot \phi_1}{\color{blue}{\phi_1}} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

   8. Applied rewrites 80.4%

      \[\leadsto \left(-\phi_1\right) \cdot \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(-R, \phi_2, \phi_1 \cdot R\right)}{\color{blue}{\phi_1}} \]

   9. Taylor expanded in phi1 around 0

      \[\leadsto -1 \cdot \left(R \cdot \phi_1\right) + \color{blue}{R \cdot \phi_2} \]
   10. Step-by-step derivation

   11. Applied rewrites 82.7%

       \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(-1, \phi_1, \phi_2\right) \cdot \color{blue}{R} \]
   12. Step-by-step derivation

   13. Applied rewrites 82.7%

       \[\leadsto \left(\left(-\phi_1\right) + \phi_2\right) \cdot R \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 8: 68.6% accurate, 2.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} [R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2] = \mathsf{sort}([R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2])\\ \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\phi_1 \leq -2.25 \cdot 10^{+51}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(\left(-\phi_1\right) + \phi_2\right) \cdot R\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\lambda_1, \phi_2\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

NOTE: R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, and phi2 should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
(FPCore (R lambda1 lambda2 phi1 phi2)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= phi1 -2.25e+51) (* (+ (- phi1) phi2) R) (* R (hypot lambda1 phi2))))

C

assert(R < lambda1 && lambda1 < lambda2 && lambda2 < phi1 && phi1 < phi2);
double code(double R, double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	double tmp;
	if (phi1 <= -2.25e+51) {
		tmp = (-phi1 + phi2) * R;
	} else {
		tmp = R * hypot(lambda1, phi2);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Java

assert R < lambda1 && lambda1 < lambda2 && lambda2 < phi1 && phi1 < phi2;
public static double code(double R, double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	double tmp;
	if (phi1 <= -2.25e+51) {
		tmp = (-phi1 + phi2) * R;
	} else {
		tmp = R * Math.hypot(lambda1, phi2);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

[R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2] = sort([R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2])
def code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2):
	tmp = 0
	if phi1 <= -2.25e+51:
		tmp = (-phi1 + phi2) * R
	else:
		tmp = R * math.hypot(lambda1, phi2)
	return tmp

Julia

R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2 = sort([R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2])
function code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (phi1 <= -2.25e+51)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(Float64(-phi1) + phi2) * R);
	else
		tmp = Float64(R * hypot(lambda1, phi2));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2 = num2cell(sort([R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2])){:}
function tmp_2 = code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (phi1 <= -2.25e+51)
		tmp = (-phi1 + phi2) * R;
	else
		tmp = R * hypot(lambda1, phi2);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

NOTE: R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, and phi2 should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
code[R_, lambda1_, lambda2_, phi1_, phi2_] := If[LessEqual[phi1, -2.25e+51], N[(N[((-phi1) + phi2), $MachinePrecision] * R), $MachinePrecision], N[(R * N[Sqrt[lambda1 ^ 2 + phi2 ^ 2], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if phi1 < -2.25e51

   1. Initial program 54.9%

      \[R \cdot \sqrt{\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) \cdot \left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) + \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \cdot \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in phi1 around -inf

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot \left(\phi_1 \cdot \left(R + -1 \cdot \frac{R \cdot \phi_2}{\phi_1}\right)\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

   5. Applied rewrites 72.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-\phi_1\right) \cdot \mathsf{fma}\left(-R, \frac{\phi_2}{\phi_1}, R\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in phi1 around 0

      \[\leadsto \left(-\phi_1\right) \cdot \frac{-1 \cdot \left(R \cdot \phi_2\right) + R \cdot \phi_1}{\color{blue}{\phi_1}} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

   8. Applied rewrites 76.1%

      \[\leadsto \left(-\phi_1\right) \cdot \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(-R, \phi_2, \phi_1 \cdot R\right)}{\color{blue}{\phi_1}} \]

   9. Taylor expanded in phi1 around 0

      \[\leadsto -1 \cdot \left(R \cdot \phi_1\right) + \color{blue}{R \cdot \phi_2} \]
   10. Step-by-step derivation

   11. Applied rewrites 72.8%

       \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(-1, \phi_1, \phi_2\right) \cdot \color{blue}{R} \]
   12. Step-by-step derivation

   13. Applied rewrites 72.8%

       \[\leadsto \left(\left(-\phi_1\right) + \phi_2\right) \cdot R \]

   if -2.25e51 < phi1

   1. Initial program 65.1%

      \[R \cdot \sqrt{\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) \cdot \left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) + \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \cdot \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in phi1 around 0

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\sqrt{{\cos \left(\frac{1}{2} \cdot \phi_2\right)}^{2} \cdot {\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)}^{2} + {\phi_2}^{2}}} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

   5. Applied rewrites 81.9%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(\cos \left(-0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right) \cdot \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right), \phi_2\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in lambda1 around inf

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\lambda_1 \cdot \cos \left(\frac{-1}{2} \cdot \phi_2\right), \phi_2\right) \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

   8. Applied rewrites 57.8%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right) \cdot \lambda_1, \phi_2\right) \]

   9. Taylor expanded in phi2 around 0

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\lambda_1, \phi_2\right) \]
   10. Step-by-step derivation

   11. Applied rewrites 54.4%

       \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\lambda_1, \phi_2\right) \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 9: 58.9% accurate, 5.9× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} [R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2] = \mathsf{sort}([R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2])\\ \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;R \leq 4.25 \cdot 10^{+80}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(\left(-\phi_1\right) + \phi_2\right) \cdot R\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(-\phi_1\right) \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(\frac{R}{\phi_1}, -1, \frac{R}{\phi_2}\right) \cdot \phi_2\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

NOTE: R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, and phi2 should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
(FPCore (R lambda1 lambda2 phi1 phi2)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= R 4.25e+80)
   (* (+ (- phi1) phi2) R)
   (* (- phi1) (* (fma (/ R phi1) -1.0 (/ R phi2)) phi2))))

C

assert(R < lambda1 && lambda1 < lambda2 && lambda2 < phi1 && phi1 < phi2);
double code(double R, double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	double tmp;
	if (R <= 4.25e+80) {
		tmp = (-phi1 + phi2) * R;
	} else {
		tmp = -phi1 * (fma((R / phi1), -1.0, (R / phi2)) * phi2);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Julia

R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2 = sort([R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2])
function code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (R <= 4.25e+80)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(Float64(-phi1) + phi2) * R);
	else
		tmp = Float64(Float64(-phi1) * Float64(fma(Float64(R / phi1), -1.0, Float64(R / phi2)) * phi2));
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

NOTE: R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, and phi2 should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
code[R_, lambda1_, lambda2_, phi1_, phi2_] := If[LessEqual[R, 4.25e+80], N[(N[((-phi1) + phi2), $MachinePrecision] * R), $MachinePrecision], N[((-phi1) * N[(N[(N[(R / phi1), $MachinePrecision] * -1.0 + N[(R / phi2), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] * phi2), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if R < 4.25000000000000003e80

   1. Initial program 52.6%

      \[R \cdot \sqrt{\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) \cdot \left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) + \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \cdot \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in phi1 around -inf

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot \left(\phi_1 \cdot \left(R + -1 \cdot \frac{R \cdot \phi_2}{\phi_1}\right)\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

   5. Applied rewrites 26.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-\phi_1\right) \cdot \mathsf{fma}\left(-R, \frac{\phi_2}{\phi_1}, R\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in phi1 around 0

      \[\leadsto \left(-\phi_1\right) \cdot \frac{-1 \cdot \left(R \cdot \phi_2\right) + R \cdot \phi_1}{\color{blue}{\phi_1}} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

   8. Applied rewrites 29.5%

      \[\leadsto \left(-\phi_1\right) \cdot \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(-R, \phi_2, \phi_1 \cdot R\right)}{\color{blue}{\phi_1}} \]

   9. Taylor expanded in phi1 around 0

      \[\leadsto -1 \cdot \left(R \cdot \phi_1\right) + \color{blue}{R \cdot \phi_2} \]
   10. Step-by-step derivation

   11. Applied rewrites 28.1%

       \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(-1, \phi_1, \phi_2\right) \cdot \color{blue}{R} \]
   12. Step-by-step derivation

   13. Applied rewrites 28.1%

       \[\leadsto \left(\left(-\phi_1\right) + \phi_2\right) \cdot R \]

   if 4.25000000000000003e80 < R

   1. Initial program 98.3%

      \[R \cdot \sqrt{\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) \cdot \left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) + \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \cdot \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in phi1 around -inf

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot \left(\phi_1 \cdot \left(R + -1 \cdot \frac{R \cdot \phi_2}{\phi_1}\right)\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

   5. Applied rewrites 40.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-\phi_1\right) \cdot \mathsf{fma}\left(-R, \frac{\phi_2}{\phi_1}, R\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in phi2 around inf

      \[\leadsto \left(-\phi_1\right) \cdot \left(\phi_2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot \frac{R}{\phi_1} + \frac{R}{\phi_2}\right)}\right) \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

   8. Applied rewrites 46.5%

      \[\leadsto \left(-\phi_1\right) \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(\frac{R}{\phi_1}, -1, \frac{R}{\phi_2}\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\phi_2}\right) \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 10: 59.9% accurate, 8.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} [R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2] = \mathsf{sort}([R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2])\\ \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\phi_2 \leq 2 \cdot 10^{+83}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(-\phi_1\right) \cdot \mathsf{fma}\left(\phi_2, \frac{-R}{\phi_1}, R\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(\left(-\phi_1\right) + \phi_2\right) \cdot R\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

NOTE: R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, and phi2 should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
(FPCore (R lambda1 lambda2 phi1 phi2)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= phi2 2e+83)
   (* (- phi1) (fma phi2 (/ (- R) phi1) R))
   (* (+ (- phi1) phi2) R)))

C

assert(R < lambda1 && lambda1 < lambda2 && lambda2 < phi1 && phi1 < phi2);
double code(double R, double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	double tmp;
	if (phi2 <= 2e+83) {
		tmp = -phi1 * fma(phi2, (-R / phi1), R);
	} else {
		tmp = (-phi1 + phi2) * R;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Julia

R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2 = sort([R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2])
function code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (phi2 <= 2e+83)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(-phi1) * fma(phi2, Float64(Float64(-R) / phi1), R));
	else
		tmp = Float64(Float64(Float64(-phi1) + phi2) * R);
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

NOTE: R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, and phi2 should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
code[R_, lambda1_, lambda2_, phi1_, phi2_] := If[LessEqual[phi2, 2e+83], N[((-phi1) * N[(phi2 * N[((-R) / phi1), $MachinePrecision] + R), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[((-phi1) + phi2), $MachinePrecision] * R), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if phi2 < 2.00000000000000006e83

   1. Initial program 63.6%

      \[R \cdot \sqrt{\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) \cdot \left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) + \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \cdot \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in phi1 around -inf

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot \left(\phi_1 \cdot \left(R + -1 \cdot \frac{R \cdot \phi_2}{\phi_1}\right)\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

   5. Applied rewrites 21.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-\phi_1\right) \cdot \mathsf{fma}\left(-R, \frac{\phi_2}{\phi_1}, R\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in phi1 around 0

      \[\leadsto \left(-\phi_1\right) \cdot \frac{-1 \cdot \left(R \cdot \phi_2\right) + R \cdot \phi_1}{\color{blue}{\phi_1}} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

   8. Applied rewrites 22.3%

      \[\leadsto \left(-\phi_1\right) \cdot \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(-R, \phi_2, \phi_1 \cdot R\right)}{\color{blue}{\phi_1}} \]
   9. Step-by-step derivation

   10. Applied rewrites 26.3%

       \[\leadsto \left(-\phi_1\right) \cdot \mathsf{fma}\left(\phi_2, \frac{-R}{\color{blue}{\phi_1}}, \frac{\phi_1 \cdot R}{\phi_1}\right) \]

   11. Taylor expanded in R around 0

       \[\leadsto \left(-\phi_1\right) \cdot \mathsf{fma}\left(\phi_2, \frac{-R}{\phi_1}, R\right) \]
   12. Step-by-step derivation

   13. Applied rewrites 25.4%

       \[\leadsto \left(-\phi_1\right) \cdot \mathsf{fma}\left(\phi_2, \frac{-R}{\phi_1}, R\right) \]

   if 2.00000000000000006e83 < phi2

   1. Initial program 59.0%

      \[R \cdot \sqrt{\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) \cdot \left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) + \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \cdot \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in phi1 around -inf

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot \left(\phi_1 \cdot \left(R + -1 \cdot \frac{R \cdot \phi_2}{\phi_1}\right)\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

   5. Applied rewrites 67.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-\phi_1\right) \cdot \mathsf{fma}\left(-R, \frac{\phi_2}{\phi_1}, R\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in phi1 around 0

      \[\leadsto \left(-\phi_1\right) \cdot \frac{-1 \cdot \left(R \cdot \phi_2\right) + R \cdot \phi_1}{\color{blue}{\phi_1}} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

   8. Applied rewrites 80.4%

      \[\leadsto \left(-\phi_1\right) \cdot \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(-R, \phi_2, \phi_1 \cdot R\right)}{\color{blue}{\phi_1}} \]

   9. Taylor expanded in phi1 around 0

      \[\leadsto -1 \cdot \left(R \cdot \phi_1\right) + \color{blue}{R \cdot \phi_2} \]
   10. Step-by-step derivation

   11. Applied rewrites 82.7%

       \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(-1, \phi_1, \phi_2\right) \cdot \color{blue}{R} \]
   12. Step-by-step derivation

   13. Applied rewrites 82.7%

       \[\leadsto \left(\left(-\phi_1\right) + \phi_2\right) \cdot R \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 11: 58.4% accurate, 9.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} [R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2] = \mathsf{sort}([R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2])\\ \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;R \leq 2.4 \cdot 10^{+104}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(\left(-\phi_1\right) + \phi_2\right) \cdot R\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(-R, \frac{\phi_1}{\phi_2}, R\right) \cdot \phi_2\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

NOTE: R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, and phi2 should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
(FPCore (R lambda1 lambda2 phi1 phi2)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= R 2.4e+104)
   (* (+ (- phi1) phi2) R)
   (* (fma (- R) (/ phi1 phi2) R) phi2)))

C

assert(R < lambda1 && lambda1 < lambda2 && lambda2 < phi1 && phi1 < phi2);
double code(double R, double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	double tmp;
	if (R <= 2.4e+104) {
		tmp = (-phi1 + phi2) * R;
	} else {
		tmp = fma(-R, (phi1 / phi2), R) * phi2;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Julia

R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2 = sort([R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2])
function code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (R <= 2.4e+104)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(Float64(-phi1) + phi2) * R);
	else
		tmp = Float64(fma(Float64(-R), Float64(phi1 / phi2), R) * phi2);
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

NOTE: R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, and phi2 should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
code[R_, lambda1_, lambda2_, phi1_, phi2_] := If[LessEqual[R, 2.4e+104], N[(N[((-phi1) + phi2), $MachinePrecision] * R), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[((-R) * N[(phi1 / phi2), $MachinePrecision] + R), $MachinePrecision] * phi2), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if R < 2.4e104

   1. Initial program 53.5%

      \[R \cdot \sqrt{\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) \cdot \left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) + \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \cdot \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in phi1 around -inf

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot \left(\phi_1 \cdot \left(R + -1 \cdot \frac{R \cdot \phi_2}{\phi_1}\right)\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

   5. Applied rewrites 26.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-\phi_1\right) \cdot \mathsf{fma}\left(-R, \frac{\phi_2}{\phi_1}, R\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in phi1 around 0

      \[\leadsto \left(-\phi_1\right) \cdot \frac{-1 \cdot \left(R \cdot \phi_2\right) + R \cdot \phi_1}{\color{blue}{\phi_1}} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

   8. Applied rewrites 29.4%

      \[\leadsto \left(-\phi_1\right) \cdot \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(-R, \phi_2, \phi_1 \cdot R\right)}{\color{blue}{\phi_1}} \]

   9. Taylor expanded in phi1 around 0

      \[\leadsto -1 \cdot \left(R \cdot \phi_1\right) + \color{blue}{R \cdot \phi_2} \]
   10. Step-by-step derivation

   11. Applied rewrites 28.1%

       \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(-1, \phi_1, \phi_2\right) \cdot \color{blue}{R} \]
   12. Step-by-step derivation

   13. Applied rewrites 28.1%

       \[\leadsto \left(\left(-\phi_1\right) + \phi_2\right) \cdot R \]

   if 2.4e104 < R

   1. Initial program 98.2%

      \[R \cdot \sqrt{\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) \cdot \left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) + \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \cdot \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in phi2 around inf

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\phi_2 \cdot \left(R + -1 \cdot \frac{R \cdot \phi_1}{\phi_2}\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

   5. Applied rewrites 39.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(-R, \frac{\phi_1}{\phi_2}, R\right) \cdot \phi_2} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 12: 58.2% accurate, 9.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} [R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2] = \mathsf{sort}([R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2])\\ \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;R \leq 2 \cdot 10^{+98}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(\left(-\phi_1\right) + \phi_2\right) \cdot R\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(R, \frac{\phi_2}{\phi_1}, -R\right) \cdot \phi_1\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

NOTE: R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, and phi2 should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
(FPCore (R lambda1 lambda2 phi1 phi2)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= R 2e+98)
   (* (+ (- phi1) phi2) R)
   (* (fma R (/ phi2 phi1) (- R)) phi1)))

C

assert(R < lambda1 && lambda1 < lambda2 && lambda2 < phi1 && phi1 < phi2);
double code(double R, double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	double tmp;
	if (R <= 2e+98) {
		tmp = (-phi1 + phi2) * R;
	} else {
		tmp = fma(R, (phi2 / phi1), -R) * phi1;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Julia

R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2 = sort([R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2])
function code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (R <= 2e+98)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(Float64(-phi1) + phi2) * R);
	else
		tmp = Float64(fma(R, Float64(phi2 / phi1), Float64(-R)) * phi1);
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

NOTE: R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, and phi2 should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
code[R_, lambda1_, lambda2_, phi1_, phi2_] := If[LessEqual[R, 2e+98], N[(N[((-phi1) + phi2), $MachinePrecision] * R), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[(R * N[(phi2 / phi1), $MachinePrecision] + (-R)), $MachinePrecision] * phi1), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if R < 2e98

   1. Initial program 53.5%

      \[R \cdot \sqrt{\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) \cdot \left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) + \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \cdot \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in phi1 around -inf

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot \left(\phi_1 \cdot \left(R + -1 \cdot \frac{R \cdot \phi_2}{\phi_1}\right)\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

   5. Applied rewrites 26.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-\phi_1\right) \cdot \mathsf{fma}\left(-R, \frac{\phi_2}{\phi_1}, R\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in phi1 around 0

      \[\leadsto \left(-\phi_1\right) \cdot \frac{-1 \cdot \left(R \cdot \phi_2\right) + R \cdot \phi_1}{\color{blue}{\phi_1}} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

   8. Applied rewrites 29.4%

      \[\leadsto \left(-\phi_1\right) \cdot \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(-R, \phi_2, \phi_1 \cdot R\right)}{\color{blue}{\phi_1}} \]

   9. Taylor expanded in phi1 around 0

      \[\leadsto -1 \cdot \left(R \cdot \phi_1\right) + \color{blue}{R \cdot \phi_2} \]
   10. Step-by-step derivation

   11. Applied rewrites 28.1%

       \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(-1, \phi_1, \phi_2\right) \cdot \color{blue}{R} \]
   12. Step-by-step derivation

   13. Applied rewrites 28.1%

       \[\leadsto \left(\left(-\phi_1\right) + \phi_2\right) \cdot R \]

   if 2e98 < R

   1. Initial program 98.2%

      \[R \cdot \sqrt{\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) \cdot \left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) + \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \cdot \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in phi1 around -inf

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot \left(\phi_1 \cdot \left(R + -1 \cdot \frac{R \cdot \phi_2}{\phi_1}\right)\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

   5. Applied rewrites 41.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-\phi_1\right) \cdot \mathsf{fma}\left(-R, \frac{\phi_2}{\phi_1}, R\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in phi1 around inf

      \[\leadsto \phi_1 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot R + \frac{R \cdot \phi_2}{\phi_1}\right)} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

   8. Applied rewrites 41.1%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(R, \frac{\phi_2}{\phi_1}, -R\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\phi_1} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 13: 52.3% accurate, 19.9× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} [R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2] = \mathsf{sort}([R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2])\\ \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\phi_2 \leq 8.8 \cdot 10^{+63}:\\ \;\;\;\;R \cdot \left(-\phi_1\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;R \cdot \phi_2\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

NOTE: R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, and phi2 should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
(FPCore (R lambda1 lambda2 phi1 phi2)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= phi2 8.8e+63) (* R (- phi1)) (* R phi2)))

C

assert(R < lambda1 && lambda1 < lambda2 && lambda2 < phi1 && phi1 < phi2);
double code(double R, double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	double tmp;
	if (phi2 <= 8.8e+63) {
		tmp = R * -phi1;
	} else {
		tmp = R * phi2;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

NOTE: R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, and phi2 should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
module fmin_fmax_functions
    implicit none
    private
    public fmax
    public fmin

    interface fmax
        module procedure fmax88
        module procedure fmax44
        module procedure fmax84
        module procedure fmax48
    end interface
    interface fmin
        module procedure fmin88
        module procedure fmin44
        module procedure fmin84
        module procedure fmin48
    end interface
contains
    real(8) function fmax88(x, y) result (res)
        real(8), intent (in) :: x
        real(8), intent (in) :: y
        res = merge(y, merge(x, max(x, y), y /= y), x /= x)
    end function
    real(4) function fmax44(x, y) result (res)
        real(4), intent (in) :: x
        real(4), intent (in) :: y
        res = merge(y, merge(x, max(x, y), y /= y), x /= x)
    end function
    real(8) function fmax84(x, y) result(res)
        real(8), intent (in) :: x
        real(4), intent (in) :: y
        res = merge(dble(y), merge(x, max(x, dble(y)), y /= y), x /= x)
    end function
    real(8) function fmax48(x, y) result(res)
        real(4), intent (in) :: x
        real(8), intent (in) :: y
        res = merge(y, merge(dble(x), max(dble(x), y), y /= y), x /= x)
    end function
    real(8) function fmin88(x, y) result (res)
        real(8), intent (in) :: x
        real(8), intent (in) :: y
        res = merge(y, merge(x, min(x, y), y /= y), x /= x)
    end function
    real(4) function fmin44(x, y) result (res)
        real(4), intent (in) :: x
        real(4), intent (in) :: y
        res = merge(y, merge(x, min(x, y), y /= y), x /= x)
    end function
    real(8) function fmin84(x, y) result(res)
        real(8), intent (in) :: x
        real(4), intent (in) :: y
        res = merge(dble(y), merge(x, min(x, dble(y)), y /= y), x /= x)
    end function
    real(8) function fmin48(x, y) result(res)
        real(4), intent (in) :: x
        real(8), intent (in) :: y
        res = merge(y, merge(dble(x), min(dble(x), y), y /= y), x /= x)
    end function
end module

real(8) function code(r, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
use fmin_fmax_functions
    real(8), intent (in) :: r
    real(8), intent (in) :: lambda1
    real(8), intent (in) :: lambda2
    real(8), intent (in) :: phi1
    real(8), intent (in) :: phi2
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (phi2 <= 8.8d+63) then
        tmp = r * -phi1
    else
        tmp = r * phi2
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

assert R < lambda1 && lambda1 < lambda2 && lambda2 < phi1 && phi1 < phi2;
public static double code(double R, double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	double tmp;
	if (phi2 <= 8.8e+63) {
		tmp = R * -phi1;
	} else {
		tmp = R * phi2;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

[R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2] = sort([R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2])
def code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2):
	tmp = 0
	if phi2 <= 8.8e+63:
		tmp = R * -phi1
	else:
		tmp = R * phi2
	return tmp

Julia

R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2 = sort([R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2])
function code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (phi2 <= 8.8e+63)
		tmp = Float64(R * Float64(-phi1));
	else
		tmp = Float64(R * phi2);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2 = num2cell(sort([R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2])){:}
function tmp_2 = code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (phi2 <= 8.8e+63)
		tmp = R * -phi1;
	else
		tmp = R * phi2;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

NOTE: R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, and phi2 should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
code[R_, lambda1_, lambda2_, phi1_, phi2_] := If[LessEqual[phi2, 8.8e+63], N[(R * (-phi1)), $MachinePrecision], N[(R * phi2), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if phi2 < 8.7999999999999995e63

   1. Initial program 64.1%

      \[R \cdot \sqrt{\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) \cdot \left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) + \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \cdot \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in phi1 around -inf

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot \phi_1\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

   5. Applied rewrites 19.9%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-\phi_1\right)} \]

   if 8.7999999999999995e63 < phi2

   1. Initial program 56.5%

      \[R \cdot \sqrt{\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) \cdot \left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) + \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \cdot \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in phi2 around inf

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\phi_2} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

   5. Applied rewrites 74.6%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\phi_2} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 14: 57.9% accurate, 25.4× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} [R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2] = \mathsf{sort}([R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2])\\ \\ \left(\left(-\phi_1\right) + \phi_2\right) \cdot R \end{array} \]

FPCore

NOTE: R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, and phi2 should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
(FPCore (R lambda1 lambda2 phi1 phi2)
 :precision binary64
 (* (+ (- phi1) phi2) R))

C

assert(R < lambda1 && lambda1 < lambda2 && lambda2 < phi1 && phi1 < phi2);
double code(double R, double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	return (-phi1 + phi2) * R;
}

Fortran

NOTE: R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, and phi2 should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
module fmin_fmax_functions
    implicit none
    private
    public fmax
    public fmin

    interface fmax
        module procedure fmax88
        module procedure fmax44
        module procedure fmax84
        module procedure fmax48
    end interface
    interface fmin
        module procedure fmin88
        module procedure fmin44
        module procedure fmin84
        module procedure fmin48
    end interface
contains
    real(8) function fmax88(x, y) result (res)
        real(8), intent (in) :: x
        real(8), intent (in) :: y
        res = merge(y, merge(x, max(x, y), y /= y), x /= x)
    end function
    real(4) function fmax44(x, y) result (res)
        real(4), intent (in) :: x
        real(4), intent (in) :: y
        res = merge(y, merge(x, max(x, y), y /= y), x /= x)
    end function
    real(8) function fmax84(x, y) result(res)
        real(8), intent (in) :: x
        real(4), intent (in) :: y
        res = merge(dble(y), merge(x, max(x, dble(y)), y /= y), x /= x)
    end function
    real(8) function fmax48(x, y) result(res)
        real(4), intent (in) :: x
        real(8), intent (in) :: y
        res = merge(y, merge(dble(x), max(dble(x), y), y /= y), x /= x)
    end function
    real(8) function fmin88(x, y) result (res)
        real(8), intent (in) :: x
        real(8), intent (in) :: y
        res = merge(y, merge(x, min(x, y), y /= y), x /= x)
    end function
    real(4) function fmin44(x, y) result (res)
        real(4), intent (in) :: x
        real(4), intent (in) :: y
        res = merge(y, merge(x, min(x, y), y /= y), x /= x)
    end function
    real(8) function fmin84(x, y) result(res)
        real(8), intent (in) :: x
        real(4), intent (in) :: y
        res = merge(dble(y), merge(x, min(x, dble(y)), y /= y), x /= x)
    end function
    real(8) function fmin48(x, y) result(res)
        real(4), intent (in) :: x
        real(8), intent (in) :: y
        res = merge(y, merge(dble(x), min(dble(x), y), y /= y), x /= x)
    end function
end module

real(8) function code(r, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
use fmin_fmax_functions
    real(8), intent (in) :: r
    real(8), intent (in) :: lambda1
    real(8), intent (in) :: lambda2
    real(8), intent (in) :: phi1
    real(8), intent (in) :: phi2
    code = (-phi1 + phi2) * r
end function

Java

assert R < lambda1 && lambda1 < lambda2 && lambda2 < phi1 && phi1 < phi2;
public static double code(double R, double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	return (-phi1 + phi2) * R;
}

Python

[R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2] = sort([R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2])
def code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2):
	return (-phi1 + phi2) * R

Julia

R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2 = sort([R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2])
function code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(-phi1) + phi2) * R)
end

MATLAB

R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2 = num2cell(sort([R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2])){:}
function tmp = code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	tmp = (-phi1 + phi2) * R;
end

Wolfram

NOTE: R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, and phi2 should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
code[R_, lambda1_, lambda2_, phi1_, phi2_] := N[(N[((-phi1) + phi2), $MachinePrecision] * R), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 62.8%

   \[R \cdot \sqrt{\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) \cdot \left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) + \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \cdot \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
2. Add Preprocessing

3. Taylor expanded in phi1 around -inf

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot \left(\phi_1 \cdot \left(R + -1 \cdot \frac{R \cdot \phi_2}{\phi_1}\right)\right)} \]
4. Step-by-step derivation

5. Applied rewrites 29.2%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-\phi_1\right) \cdot \mathsf{fma}\left(-R, \frac{\phi_2}{\phi_1}, R\right)} \]

6. Taylor expanded in phi1 around 0

   \[\leadsto \left(-\phi_1\right) \cdot \frac{-1 \cdot \left(R \cdot \phi_2\right) + R \cdot \phi_1}{\color{blue}{\phi_1}} \]
7. Step-by-step derivation

8. Applied rewrites 32.3%

   \[\leadsto \left(-\phi_1\right) \cdot \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(-R, \phi_2, \phi_1 \cdot R\right)}{\color{blue}{\phi_1}} \]

9. Taylor expanded in phi1 around 0

   \[\leadsto -1 \cdot \left(R \cdot \phi_1\right) + \color{blue}{R \cdot \phi_2} \]
10. Step-by-step derivation

11. Applied rewrites 30.4%

    \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(-1, \phi_1, \phi_2\right) \cdot \color{blue}{R} \]
12. Step-by-step derivation

13. Applied rewrites 30.4%

    \[\leadsto \left(\left(-\phi_1\right) + \phi_2\right) \cdot R \]
14. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 15: 32.0% accurate, 46.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} [R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2] = \mathsf{sort}([R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2])\\ \\ R \cdot \phi_2 \end{array} \]

FPCore

NOTE: R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, and phi2 should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
(FPCore (R lambda1 lambda2 phi1 phi2) :precision binary64 (* R phi2))

C

assert(R < lambda1 && lambda1 < lambda2 && lambda2 < phi1 && phi1 < phi2);
double code(double R, double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	return R * phi2;
}

Fortran

NOTE: R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, and phi2 should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
module fmin_fmax_functions
    implicit none
    private
    public fmax
    public fmin

    interface fmax
        module procedure fmax88
        module procedure fmax44
        module procedure fmax84
        module procedure fmax48
    end interface
    interface fmin
        module procedure fmin88
        module procedure fmin44
        module procedure fmin84
        module procedure fmin48
    end interface
contains
    real(8) function fmax88(x, y) result (res)
        real(8), intent (in) :: x
        real(8), intent (in) :: y
        res = merge(y, merge(x, max(x, y), y /= y), x /= x)
    end function
    real(4) function fmax44(x, y) result (res)
        real(4), intent (in) :: x
        real(4), intent (in) :: y
        res = merge(y, merge(x, max(x, y), y /= y), x /= x)
    end function
    real(8) function fmax84(x, y) result(res)
        real(8), intent (in) :: x
        real(4), intent (in) :: y
        res = merge(dble(y), merge(x, max(x, dble(y)), y /= y), x /= x)
    end function
    real(8) function fmax48(x, y) result(res)
        real(4), intent (in) :: x
        real(8), intent (in) :: y
        res = merge(y, merge(dble(x), max(dble(x), y), y /= y), x /= x)
    end function
    real(8) function fmin88(x, y) result (res)
        real(8), intent (in) :: x
        real(8), intent (in) :: y
        res = merge(y, merge(x, min(x, y), y /= y), x /= x)
    end function
    real(4) function fmin44(x, y) result (res)
        real(4), intent (in) :: x
        real(4), intent (in) :: y
        res = merge(y, merge(x, min(x, y), y /= y), x /= x)
    end function
    real(8) function fmin84(x, y) result(res)
        real(8), intent (in) :: x
        real(4), intent (in) :: y
        res = merge(dble(y), merge(x, min(x, dble(y)), y /= y), x /= x)
    end function
    real(8) function fmin48(x, y) result(res)
        real(4), intent (in) :: x
        real(8), intent (in) :: y
        res = merge(y, merge(dble(x), min(dble(x), y), y /= y), x /= x)
    end function
end module

real(8) function code(r, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
use fmin_fmax_functions
    real(8), intent (in) :: r
    real(8), intent (in) :: lambda1
    real(8), intent (in) :: lambda2
    real(8), intent (in) :: phi1
    real(8), intent (in) :: phi2
    code = r * phi2
end function

Java

assert R < lambda1 && lambda1 < lambda2 && lambda2 < phi1 && phi1 < phi2;
public static double code(double R, double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	return R * phi2;
}

Python

[R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2] = sort([R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2])
def code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2):
	return R * phi2

Julia

R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2 = sort([R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2])
function code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	return Float64(R * phi2)
end

MATLAB

R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2 = num2cell(sort([R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2])){:}
function tmp = code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	tmp = R * phi2;
end

Wolfram

NOTE: R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, and phi2 should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
code[R_, lambda1_, lambda2_, phi1_, phi2_] := N[(R * phi2), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 62.8%

   \[R \cdot \sqrt{\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) \cdot \left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) + \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \cdot \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
2. Add Preprocessing

3. Taylor expanded in phi2 around inf

   \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\phi_2} \]
4. Step-by-step derivation

5. Applied rewrites 17.3%

   \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\phi_2} \]
6. Add Preprocessing

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2025019 
(FPCore (R lambda1 lambda2 phi1 phi2)
  :name "Equirectangular approximation to distance on a great circle"
  :precision binary64
  (* R (sqrt (+ (* (* (- lambda1 lambda2) (cos (/ (+ phi1 phi2) 2.0))) (* (- lambda1 lambda2) (cos (/ (+ phi1 phi2) 2.0)))) (* (- phi1 phi2) (- phi1 phi2))))))