Sample trimmed logistic on [-pi, pi]

Percentage Accurate: 99.0% → 98.9%
Time: 19.7s
Alternatives: 9
Speedup: 1.0×

Specification

?
\[\left(2.328306437 \cdot 10^{-10} \leq u \land u \leq 1\right) \land \left(0 \leq s \land s \leq 1.0651631\right)\]
\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_0 := \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{s}}}\\ \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{s}}} - t\_0\right) + t\_0} - 1\right) \end{array} \end{array} \]
(FPCore (u s)
 :precision binary32
 (let* ((t_0 (/ 1.0 (+ 1.0 (exp (/ (PI) s))))))
   (*
    (- s)
    (log
     (-
      (/ 1.0 (+ (* u (- (/ 1.0 (+ 1.0 (exp (/ (- (PI)) s)))) t_0)) t_0))
      1.0)))))
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\begin{array}{l}
t_0 := \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{s}}}\\
\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{s}}} - t\_0\right) + t\_0} - 1\right)
\end{array}
\end{array}

Sampling outcomes in binary32 precision:

Local Percentage Accuracy vs ?

The average percentage accuracy by input value. Horizontal axis shows value of an input variable; the variable is choosen in the title. Vertical axis is accuracy; higher is better. Red represent the original program, while blue represents Herbie's suggestion. These can be toggled with buttons below the plot. The line is an average while dots represent individual samples.

Accuracy vs Speed?

Herbie found 9 alternatives:

AlternativeAccuracySpeedup
The accuracy (vertical axis) and speed (horizontal axis) of each alternatives. Up and to the right is better. The red square shows the initial program, and each blue circle shows an alternative.The line shows the best available speed-accuracy tradeoffs.

Initial Program: 99.0% accurate, 1.0× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_0 := \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{s}}}\\ \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{s}}} - t\_0\right) + t\_0} - 1\right) \end{array} \end{array} \]
(FPCore (u s)
 :precision binary32
 (let* ((t_0 (/ 1.0 (+ 1.0 (exp (/ (PI) s))))))
   (*
    (- s)
    (log
     (-
      (/ 1.0 (+ (* u (- (/ 1.0 (+ 1.0 (exp (/ (- (PI)) s)))) t_0)) t_0))
      1.0)))))
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\begin{array}{l}
t_0 := \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{s}}}\\
\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{s}}} - t\_0\right) + t\_0} - 1\right)
\end{array}
\end{array}

Alternative 1: 98.9% accurate, 0.1× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_0 := e^{-\mathsf{log1p}\left(e^{\frac{\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{s}}\right)}\\ t_1 := \mathsf{fma}\left(e^{-\mathsf{log1p}\left(e^{\frac{-\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{s}}\right)} - t\_0, u, t\_0\right)\\ t_2 := \frac{1}{t\_1} + 1\\ \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{{t\_1}^{-2} \cdot t\_2 - t\_2}{{t\_2}^{2}}\right) \end{array} \end{array} \]
(FPCore (u s)
 :precision binary32
 (let* ((t_0 (exp (- (log1p (exp (/ (PI) s))))))
        (t_1 (fma (- (exp (- (log1p (exp (/ (- (PI)) s))))) t_0) u t_0))
        (t_2 (+ (/ 1.0 t_1) 1.0)))
   (* (- s) (log (/ (- (* (pow t_1 -2.0) t_2) t_2) (pow t_2 2.0))))))
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\begin{array}{l}
t_0 := e^{-\mathsf{log1p}\left(e^{\frac{\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{s}}\right)}\\
t_1 := \mathsf{fma}\left(e^{-\mathsf{log1p}\left(e^{\frac{-\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{s}}\right)} - t\_0, u, t\_0\right)\\
t_2 := \frac{1}{t\_1} + 1\\
\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{{t\_1}^{-2} \cdot t\_2 - t\_2}{{t\_2}^{2}}\right)
\end{array}
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Initial program 98.9%

    \[\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{s}}}} - 1\right) \]
  2. Add Preprocessing
  3. Applied rewrites99.0%

    \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \color{blue}{\left(\frac{{\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(e^{-\mathsf{log1p}\left(e^{\frac{-\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{s}}\right)} - e^{-\mathsf{log1p}\left(e^{\frac{\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{s}}\right)}, u, e^{-\mathsf{log1p}\left(e^{\frac{\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{s}}\right)}\right)\right)}^{-2} \cdot \left(\frac{1}{\mathsf{fma}\left(e^{-\mathsf{log1p}\left(e^{\frac{-\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{s}}\right)} - e^{-\mathsf{log1p}\left(e^{\frac{\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{s}}\right)}, u, e^{-\mathsf{log1p}\left(e^{\frac{\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{s}}\right)}\right)} + 1\right) - \left(\frac{1}{\mathsf{fma}\left(e^{-\mathsf{log1p}\left(e^{\frac{-\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{s}}\right)} - e^{-\mathsf{log1p}\left(e^{\frac{\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{s}}\right)}, u, e^{-\mathsf{log1p}\left(e^{\frac{\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{s}}\right)}\right)} + 1\right)}{{\left(\frac{1}{\mathsf{fma}\left(e^{-\mathsf{log1p}\left(e^{\frac{-\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{s}}\right)} - e^{-\mathsf{log1p}\left(e^{\frac{\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{s}}\right)}, u, e^{-\mathsf{log1p}\left(e^{\frac{\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{s}}\right)}\right)} + 1\right)}^{2}}\right)} \]
  4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 2: 98.9% accurate, 0.2× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_0 := e^{-\mathsf{log1p}\left(e^{\frac{\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{s}}\right)}\\ t_1 := \mathsf{fma}\left(e^{-\mathsf{log1p}\left(e^{\frac{-\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{s}}\right)} - t\_0, u, t\_0\right)\\ \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{{t\_1}^{-2} - 1}{\frac{1}{t\_1} + 1}\right) \end{array} \end{array} \]
(FPCore (u s)
 :precision binary32
 (let* ((t_0 (exp (- (log1p (exp (/ (PI) s))))))
        (t_1 (fma (- (exp (- (log1p (exp (/ (- (PI)) s))))) t_0) u t_0)))
   (* (- s) (log (/ (- (pow t_1 -2.0) 1.0) (+ (/ 1.0 t_1) 1.0))))))
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\begin{array}{l}
t_0 := e^{-\mathsf{log1p}\left(e^{\frac{\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{s}}\right)}\\
t_1 := \mathsf{fma}\left(e^{-\mathsf{log1p}\left(e^{\frac{-\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{s}}\right)} - t\_0, u, t\_0\right)\\
\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{{t\_1}^{-2} - 1}{\frac{1}{t\_1} + 1}\right)
\end{array}
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Initial program 98.9%

    \[\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{s}}}} - 1\right) \]
  2. Add Preprocessing
  3. Step-by-step derivation
    1. lift--.f32N/A

      \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \color{blue}{\left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{s}}}} - 1\right)} \]
    2. flip--N/A

      \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \color{blue}{\left(\frac{\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{s}}}} \cdot \frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{s}}}} - 1 \cdot 1}{\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{s}}}} + 1}\right)} \]
    3. lower-/.f32N/A

      \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \color{blue}{\left(\frac{\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{s}}}} \cdot \frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{s}}}} - 1 \cdot 1}{\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{s}}}} + 1}\right)} \]
  4. Applied rewrites99.0%

    \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \color{blue}{\left(\frac{{\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(e^{-\mathsf{log1p}\left(e^{\frac{-\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{s}}\right)} - e^{-\mathsf{log1p}\left(e^{\frac{\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{s}}\right)}, u, e^{-\mathsf{log1p}\left(e^{\frac{\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{s}}\right)}\right)\right)}^{-2} - 1}{\frac{1}{\mathsf{fma}\left(e^{-\mathsf{log1p}\left(e^{\frac{-\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{s}}\right)} - e^{-\mathsf{log1p}\left(e^{\frac{\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{s}}\right)}, u, e^{-\mathsf{log1p}\left(e^{\frac{\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{s}}\right)}\right)} + 1}\right)} \]
  5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 3: 99.0% accurate, 1.0× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_0 := \frac{1}{e^{\frac{\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{s}} + 1}\\ \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\frac{1}{e^{\frac{-\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{s}} + 1} - t\_0, u, t\_0\right)} - 1\right) \end{array} \end{array} \]
(FPCore (u s)
 :precision binary32
 (let* ((t_0 (/ 1.0 (+ (exp (/ (PI) s)) 1.0))))
   (*
    (- s)
    (log
     (-
      (/ 1.0 (fma (- (/ 1.0 (+ (exp (/ (- (PI)) s)) 1.0)) t_0) u t_0))
      1.0)))))
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\begin{array}{l}
t_0 := \frac{1}{e^{\frac{\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{s}} + 1}\\
\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\frac{1}{e^{\frac{-\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{s}} + 1} - t\_0, u, t\_0\right)} - 1\right)
\end{array}
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Initial program 98.9%

    \[\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{s}}}} - 1\right) \]
  2. Add Preprocessing
  3. Taylor expanded in u around 0

    \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{\color{blue}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{-1 \cdot \frac{\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{s}}}}} - 1\right) \]
  4. Step-by-step derivation
    1. *-commutativeN/A

      \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{\color{blue}{\left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{-1 \cdot \frac{\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{s}}}\right) \cdot u} + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{s}}}} - 1\right) \]
    2. lower-fma.f32N/A

      \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{-1 \cdot \frac{\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{s}}}, u, \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{s}}}\right)}} - 1\right) \]
  5. Applied rewrites98.9%

    \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\frac{1}{e^{\frac{-\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{s}} + 1} - \frac{1}{e^{\frac{\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{s}} + 1}, u, \frac{1}{e^{\frac{\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{s}} + 1}\right)}} - 1\right) \]
  6. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 4: 97.7% accurate, 1.3× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{\left(\frac{1}{e^{\frac{-\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{s}} + 1} - \frac{1}{e^{\frac{\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{s}} + 1}\right) \cdot u} - 1\right) \end{array} \]
(FPCore (u s)
 :precision binary32
 (*
  (- s)
  (log
   (-
    (/
     1.0
     (*
      (- (/ 1.0 (+ (exp (/ (- (PI)) s)) 1.0)) (/ 1.0 (+ (exp (/ (PI) s)) 1.0)))
      u))
    1.0))))
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{\left(\frac{1}{e^{\frac{-\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{s}} + 1} - \frac{1}{e^{\frac{\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{s}} + 1}\right) \cdot u} - 1\right)
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Initial program 98.9%

    \[\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{s}}}} - 1\right) \]
  2. Add Preprocessing
  3. Taylor expanded in u around inf

    \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{\color{blue}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{-1 \cdot \frac{\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{s}}}\right)}} - 1\right) \]
  4. Step-by-step derivation
    1. *-commutativeN/A

      \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{\color{blue}{\left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{-1 \cdot \frac{\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{s}}}\right) \cdot u}} - 1\right) \]
    2. lower-*.f32N/A

      \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{\color{blue}{\left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{-1 \cdot \frac{\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{s}}}\right) \cdot u}} - 1\right) \]
  5. Applied rewrites98.6%

    \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{\color{blue}{\left(\frac{1}{e^{\frac{-\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{s}} + 1} - \frac{1}{e^{\frac{\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{s}} + 1}\right) \cdot u}} - 1\right) \]
  6. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 5: 37.6% accurate, 1.3× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_0 := \frac{1}{e^{\frac{\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{s}} + 1}\\ \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{\mathsf{fma}\left(0.5 - t\_0, u, t\_0\right)} - 1\right) \end{array} \end{array} \]
(FPCore (u s)
 :precision binary32
 (let* ((t_0 (/ 1.0 (+ (exp (/ (PI) s)) 1.0))))
   (* (- s) (log (- (/ 1.0 (fma (- 0.5 t_0) u t_0)) 1.0)))))
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\begin{array}{l}
t_0 := \frac{1}{e^{\frac{\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{s}} + 1}\\
\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{\mathsf{fma}\left(0.5 - t\_0, u, t\_0\right)} - 1\right)
\end{array}
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Initial program 98.9%

    \[\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{s}}}} - 1\right) \]
  2. Add Preprocessing
  3. Taylor expanded in u around 0

    \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{\color{blue}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{-1 \cdot \frac{\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{s}}}}} - 1\right) \]
  4. Step-by-step derivation
    1. *-commutativeN/A

      \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{\color{blue}{\left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{-1 \cdot \frac{\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{s}}}\right) \cdot u} + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{s}}}} - 1\right) \]
    2. lower-fma.f32N/A

      \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{-1 \cdot \frac{\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{s}}}, u, \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{s}}}\right)}} - 1\right) \]
  5. Applied rewrites98.9%

    \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\frac{1}{e^{\frac{-\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{s}} + 1} - \frac{1}{e^{\frac{\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{s}} + 1}, u, \frac{1}{e^{\frac{\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{s}} + 1}\right)}} - 1\right) \]
  6. Taylor expanded in s around inf

    \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\frac{1}{2} - \frac{1}{e^{\frac{\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{s}} + 1}, u, \frac{1}{e^{\frac{\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{s}} + 1}\right)} - 1\right) \]
  7. Step-by-step derivation
    1. Applied rewrites37.5%

      \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{\mathsf{fma}\left(0.5 - \frac{1}{e^{\frac{\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{s}} + 1}, u, \frac{1}{e^{\frac{\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{s}} + 1}\right)} - 1\right) \]
    2. Add Preprocessing

    Alternative 6: 25.2% accurate, 4.1× speedup?

    \[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(1 - \frac{-\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{s}\right) \end{array} \]
    (FPCore (u s) :precision binary32 (* (- s) (log (- 1.0 (/ (- (PI)) s)))))
    \begin{array}{l}
    
    \\
    \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(1 - \frac{-\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{s}\right)
    \end{array}
    
    Derivation
    1. Initial program 98.9%

      \[\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{s}}}} - 1\right) \]
    2. Add Preprocessing
    3. Taylor expanded in s around inf

      \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \color{blue}{1} \]
    4. Step-by-step derivation
      1. Applied rewrites10.1%

        \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \color{blue}{1} \]
      2. Taylor expanded in s around -inf

        \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \color{blue}{\left(1 + 4 \cdot \frac{u \cdot \left(\frac{-1}{4} \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right) - \frac{1}{4} \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right)\right) - \frac{-1}{4} \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{s}\right)} \]
      3. Step-by-step derivation
        1. fp-cancel-sign-sub-invN/A

          \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \color{blue}{\left(1 - \left(\mathsf{neg}\left(4\right)\right) \cdot \frac{u \cdot \left(\frac{-1}{4} \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right) - \frac{1}{4} \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right)\right) - \frac{-1}{4} \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{s}\right)} \]
        2. lower--.f32N/A

          \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \color{blue}{\left(1 - \left(\mathsf{neg}\left(4\right)\right) \cdot \frac{u \cdot \left(\frac{-1}{4} \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right) - \frac{1}{4} \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right)\right) - \frac{-1}{4} \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{s}\right)} \]
        3. metadata-evalN/A

          \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(1 - \color{blue}{-4} \cdot \frac{u \cdot \left(\frac{-1}{4} \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right) - \frac{1}{4} \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right)\right) - \frac{-1}{4} \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{s}\right) \]
        4. lower-*.f32N/A

          \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(1 - \color{blue}{-4 \cdot \frac{u \cdot \left(\frac{-1}{4} \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right) - \frac{1}{4} \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right)\right) - \frac{-1}{4} \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{s}}\right) \]
        5. lower-/.f32N/A

          \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(1 - -4 \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{u \cdot \left(\frac{-1}{4} \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right) - \frac{1}{4} \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right)\right) - \frac{-1}{4} \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{s}}\right) \]
      4. Applied rewrites25.3%

        \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \color{blue}{\left(1 - -4 \cdot \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(u, \mathsf{PI}\left(\right) \cdot -0.5, 0.25 \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right)\right)}{s}\right)} \]
      5. Taylor expanded in u around 0

        \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(1 - -1 \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{s}}\right) \]
      6. Step-by-step derivation
        1. Applied rewrites25.5%

          \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(1 - \frac{-\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{\color{blue}{s}}\right) \]
        2. Add Preprocessing

        Alternative 7: 11.6% accurate, 30.0× speedup?

        \[\begin{array}{l} \\ \mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{PI}\left(\right), -1, \left(\mathsf{PI}\left(\right) \cdot u\right) \cdot 2\right) \end{array} \]
        (FPCore (u s) :precision binary32 (fma (PI) -1.0 (* (* (PI) u) 2.0)))
        \begin{array}{l}
        
        \\
        \mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{PI}\left(\right), -1, \left(\mathsf{PI}\left(\right) \cdot u\right) \cdot 2\right)
        \end{array}
        
        Derivation
        1. Initial program 98.9%

          \[\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{s}}}} - 1\right) \]
        2. Add Preprocessing
        3. Taylor expanded in u around 0

          \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right)} \]
        4. Step-by-step derivation
          1. mul-1-negN/A

            \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{neg}\left(\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)\right)} \]
          2. lower-neg.f32N/A

            \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)} \]
          3. lower-PI.f3210.9

            \[\leadsto -\color{blue}{\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)} \]
        5. Applied rewrites10.9%

          \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)} \]
        6. Taylor expanded in s around inf

          \[\leadsto \color{blue}{4 \cdot \left(u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{4} \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right) - \frac{-1}{4} \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right)\right) - \frac{1}{4} \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right)\right)} \]
        7. Step-by-step derivation
          1. lower-*.f32N/A

            \[\leadsto \color{blue}{4 \cdot \left(u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{4} \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right) - \frac{-1}{4} \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right)\right) - \frac{1}{4} \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right)\right)} \]
          2. fp-cancel-sub-sign-invN/A

            \[\leadsto 4 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{4} \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right) - \frac{-1}{4} \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right)\right) + \left(\mathsf{neg}\left(\frac{1}{4}\right)\right) \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right)\right)} \]
          3. metadata-evalN/A

            \[\leadsto 4 \cdot \left(u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{4} \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right) - \frac{-1}{4} \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right)\right) + \color{blue}{\frac{-1}{4}} \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right)\right) \]
          4. lower-fma.f32N/A

            \[\leadsto 4 \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(u, \frac{1}{4} \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right) - \frac{-1}{4} \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right), \frac{-1}{4} \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right)\right)} \]
          5. distribute-rgt-out--N/A

            \[\leadsto 4 \cdot \mathsf{fma}\left(u, \color{blue}{\mathsf{PI}\left(\right) \cdot \left(\frac{1}{4} - \frac{-1}{4}\right)}, \frac{-1}{4} \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right)\right) \]
          6. metadata-evalN/A

            \[\leadsto 4 \cdot \mathsf{fma}\left(u, \mathsf{PI}\left(\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{1}{2}}, \frac{-1}{4} \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right)\right) \]
          7. lower-*.f32N/A

            \[\leadsto 4 \cdot \mathsf{fma}\left(u, \color{blue}{\mathsf{PI}\left(\right) \cdot \frac{1}{2}}, \frac{-1}{4} \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right)\right) \]
          8. lower-PI.f32N/A

            \[\leadsto 4 \cdot \mathsf{fma}\left(u, \color{blue}{\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)} \cdot \frac{1}{2}, \frac{-1}{4} \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right)\right) \]
          9. lower-*.f32N/A

            \[\leadsto 4 \cdot \mathsf{fma}\left(u, \mathsf{PI}\left(\right) \cdot \frac{1}{2}, \color{blue}{\frac{-1}{4} \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}\right) \]
          10. lower-PI.f3211.0

            \[\leadsto 4 \cdot \mathsf{fma}\left(u, \mathsf{PI}\left(\right) \cdot 0.5, -0.25 \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}\right) \]
        8. Applied rewrites11.0%

          \[\leadsto \color{blue}{4 \cdot \mathsf{fma}\left(u, \mathsf{PI}\left(\right) \cdot 0.5, -0.25 \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right)\right)} \]
        9. Step-by-step derivation
          1. Applied rewrites11.0%

            \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{PI}\left(\right), \color{blue}{-1}, \left(\mathsf{PI}\left(\right) \cdot u\right) \cdot 2\right) \]
          2. Add Preprocessing

          Alternative 8: 11.3% accurate, 170.0× speedup?

          \[\begin{array}{l} \\ -\mathsf{PI}\left(\right) \end{array} \]
          (FPCore (u s) :precision binary32 (- (PI)))
          \begin{array}{l}
          
          \\
          -\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)
          \end{array}
          
          Derivation
          1. Initial program 98.9%

            \[\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{s}}}} - 1\right) \]
          2. Add Preprocessing
          3. Taylor expanded in u around 0

            \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right)} \]
          4. Step-by-step derivation
            1. mul-1-negN/A

              \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{neg}\left(\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)\right)} \]
            2. lower-neg.f32N/A

              \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)} \]
            3. lower-PI.f3210.9

              \[\leadsto -\color{blue}{\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)} \]
          5. Applied rewrites10.9%

            \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)} \]
          6. Add Preprocessing

          Alternative 9: 4.6% accurate, 510.0× speedup?

          \[\begin{array}{l} \\ \mathsf{PI}\left(\right) \end{array} \]
          (FPCore (u s) :precision binary32 (PI))
          \begin{array}{l}
          
          \\
          \mathsf{PI}\left(\right)
          \end{array}
          
          Derivation
          1. Initial program 98.9%

            \[\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{s}}}} - 1\right) \]
          2. Add Preprocessing
          3. Taylor expanded in u around 0

            \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right)} \]
          4. Step-by-step derivation
            1. mul-1-negN/A

              \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{neg}\left(\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)\right)} \]
            2. lower-neg.f32N/A

              \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)} \]
            3. lower-PI.f3210.9

              \[\leadsto -\color{blue}{\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)} \]
          5. Applied rewrites10.9%

            \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)} \]
          6. Step-by-step derivation
            1. Applied rewrites10.9%

              \[\leadsto {\left(-\sqrt[3]{\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}\right)}^{\color{blue}{3}} \]
            2. Step-by-step derivation
              1. Applied rewrites4.5%

                \[\leadsto \mathsf{PI}\left(\right) \]
              2. Add Preprocessing

              Reproduce

              ?
              herbie shell --seed 2024358 
              (FPCore (u s)
                :name "Sample trimmed logistic on [-pi, pi]"
                :precision binary32
                :pre (and (and (<= 2.328306437e-10 u) (<= u 1.0)) (and (<= 0.0 s) (<= s 1.0651631)))
                (* (- s) (log (- (/ 1.0 (+ (* u (- (/ 1.0 (+ 1.0 (exp (/ (- (PI)) s)))) (/ 1.0 (+ 1.0 (exp (/ (PI) s)))))) (/ 1.0 (+ 1.0 (exp (/ (PI) s)))))) 1.0))))