Toniolo and Linder, Equation (3a)

Percentage Accurate: 100.0% → 100.0%
Time: 3.2s
Alternatives: 1
Speedup: 1.0×

Specification

?
\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \sqrt{\frac{1}{2} \cdot \left(1 + \frac{1}{\sqrt{1 + {\left(\frac{2 \cdot \ell}{Om}\right)}^{2} \cdot \left({\sin kx}^{2} + {\sin ky}^{2}\right)}}\right)} \end{array} \]
(FPCore (l Om kx ky)
 :precision binary64
 (sqrt
  (*
   (/ 1.0 2.0)
   (+
    1.0
    (/
     1.0
     (sqrt
      (+
       1.0
       (*
        (pow (/ (* 2.0 l) Om) 2.0)
        (+ (pow (sin kx) 2.0) (pow (sin ky) 2.0))))))))))
double code(double l, double Om, double kx, double ky) {
	return sqrt(((1.0 / 2.0) * (1.0 + (1.0 / sqrt((1.0 + (pow(((2.0 * l) / Om), 2.0) * (pow(sin(kx), 2.0) + pow(sin(ky), 2.0)))))))));
}

real(8) function code(l, om, kx, ky)
    real(8), intent (in) :: l
    real(8), intent (in) :: om
    real(8), intent (in) :: kx
    real(8), intent (in) :: ky
    code = sqrt(((1.0d0 / 2.0d0) * (1.0d0 + (1.0d0 / sqrt((1.0d0 + ((((2.0d0 * l) / om) ** 2.0d0) * ((sin(kx) ** 2.0d0) + (sin(ky) ** 2.0d0)))))))))
end function

public static double code(double l, double Om, double kx, double ky) {
	return Math.sqrt(((1.0 / 2.0) * (1.0 + (1.0 / Math.sqrt((1.0 + (Math.pow(((2.0 * l) / Om), 2.0) * (Math.pow(Math.sin(kx), 2.0) + Math.pow(Math.sin(ky), 2.0)))))))));
}

def code(l, Om, kx, ky):
	return math.sqrt(((1.0 / 2.0) * (1.0 + (1.0 / math.sqrt((1.0 + (math.pow(((2.0 * l) / Om), 2.0) * (math.pow(math.sin(kx), 2.0) + math.pow(math.sin(ky), 2.0)))))))))

function code(l, Om, kx, ky)
	return sqrt(Float64(Float64(1.0 / 2.0) * Float64(1.0 + Float64(1.0 / sqrt(Float64(1.0 + Float64((Float64(Float64(2.0 * l) / Om) ^ 2.0) * Float64((sin(kx) ^ 2.0) + (sin(ky) ^ 2.0)))))))))
end

function tmp = code(l, Om, kx, ky)
	tmp = sqrt(((1.0 / 2.0) * (1.0 + (1.0 / sqrt((1.0 + ((((2.0 * l) / Om) ^ 2.0) * ((sin(kx) ^ 2.0) + (sin(ky) ^ 2.0)))))))));
end

code[l_, Om_, kx_, ky_] := N[Sqrt[N[(N[(1.0 / 2.0), $MachinePrecision] * N[(1.0 + N[(1.0 / N[Sqrt[N[(1.0 + N[(N[Power[N[(N[(2.0 * l), $MachinePrecision] / Om), $MachinePrecision], 2.0], $MachinePrecision] * N[(N[Power[N[Sin[kx], $MachinePrecision], 2.0], $MachinePrecision] + N[Power[N[Sin[ky], $MachinePrecision], 2.0], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]

\begin{array}{l}

\\
\sqrt{\frac{1}{2} \cdot \left(1 + \frac{1}{\sqrt{1 + {\left(\frac{2 \cdot \ell}{Om}\right)}^{2} \cdot \left({\sin kx}^{2} + {\sin ky}^{2}\right)}}\right)}
\end{array}

Sampling outcomes in binary64 precision:

Local Percentage Accuracy vs ?

The average percentage accuracy by input value. Horizontal axis shows value of an input variable; the variable is choosen in the title. Vertical axis is accuracy; higher is better. Red represent the original program, while blue represents Herbie's suggestion. These can be toggled with buttons below the plot. The line is an average while dots represent individual samples.

Accuracy vs Speed?

Herbie found 1 alternatives:

AlternativeAccuracySpeedup
The accuracy (vertical axis) and speed (horizontal axis) of each alternatives. Up and to the right is better. The red square shows the initial program, and each blue circle shows an alternative.The line shows the best available speed-accuracy tradeoffs.

Initial Program: 100.0% accurate, 1.0× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \sqrt{\frac{1}{2} \cdot \left(1 + \frac{1}{\sqrt{1 + {\left(\frac{2 \cdot \ell}{Om}\right)}^{2} \cdot \left({\sin kx}^{2} + {\sin ky}^{2}\right)}}\right)} \end{array} \]
(FPCore (l Om kx ky)
 :precision binary64
 (sqrt
  (*
   (/ 1.0 2.0)
   (+
    1.0
    (/
     1.0
     (sqrt
      (+
       1.0
       (*
        (pow (/ (* 2.0 l) Om) 2.0)
        (+ (pow (sin kx) 2.0) (pow (sin ky) 2.0))))))))))
double code(double l, double Om, double kx, double ky) {
	return sqrt(((1.0 / 2.0) * (1.0 + (1.0 / sqrt((1.0 + (pow(((2.0 * l) / Om), 2.0) * (pow(sin(kx), 2.0) + pow(sin(ky), 2.0)))))))));
}

real(8) function code(l, om, kx, ky)
    real(8), intent (in) :: l
    real(8), intent (in) :: om
    real(8), intent (in) :: kx
    real(8), intent (in) :: ky
    code = sqrt(((1.0d0 / 2.0d0) * (1.0d0 + (1.0d0 / sqrt((1.0d0 + ((((2.0d0 * l) / om) ** 2.0d0) * ((sin(kx) ** 2.0d0) + (sin(ky) ** 2.0d0)))))))))
end function

public static double code(double l, double Om, double kx, double ky) {
	return Math.sqrt(((1.0 / 2.0) * (1.0 + (1.0 / Math.sqrt((1.0 + (Math.pow(((2.0 * l) / Om), 2.0) * (Math.pow(Math.sin(kx), 2.0) + Math.pow(Math.sin(ky), 2.0)))))))));
}

def code(l, Om, kx, ky):
	return math.sqrt(((1.0 / 2.0) * (1.0 + (1.0 / math.sqrt((1.0 + (math.pow(((2.0 * l) / Om), 2.0) * (math.pow(math.sin(kx), 2.0) + math.pow(math.sin(ky), 2.0)))))))))

function code(l, Om, kx, ky)
	return sqrt(Float64(Float64(1.0 / 2.0) * Float64(1.0 + Float64(1.0 / sqrt(Float64(1.0 + Float64((Float64(Float64(2.0 * l) / Om) ^ 2.0) * Float64((sin(kx) ^ 2.0) + (sin(ky) ^ 2.0)))))))))
end

function tmp = code(l, Om, kx, ky)
	tmp = sqrt(((1.0 / 2.0) * (1.0 + (1.0 / sqrt((1.0 + ((((2.0 * l) / Om) ^ 2.0) * ((sin(kx) ^ 2.0) + (sin(ky) ^ 2.0)))))))));
end

code[l_, Om_, kx_, ky_] := N[Sqrt[N[(N[(1.0 / 2.0), $MachinePrecision] * N[(1.0 + N[(1.0 / N[Sqrt[N[(1.0 + N[(N[Power[N[(N[(2.0 * l), $MachinePrecision] / Om), $MachinePrecision], 2.0], $MachinePrecision] * N[(N[Power[N[Sin[kx], $MachinePrecision], 2.0], $MachinePrecision] + N[Power[N[Sin[ky], $MachinePrecision], 2.0], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]

\begin{array}{l}

\\
\sqrt{\frac{1}{2} \cdot \left(1 + \frac{1}{\sqrt{1 + {\left(\frac{2 \cdot \ell}{Om}\right)}^{2} \cdot \left({\sin kx}^{2} + {\sin ky}^{2}\right)}}\right)}
\end{array}

Alternative 1: 100.0% accurate, 1.0× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \sqrt{\left(\frac{1}{\sqrt{\left({\sin ky}^{2} + {\sin kx}^{2}\right) \cdot {\left(\frac{\ell \cdot 2}{Om}\right)}^{2} + 1}} + 1\right) \cdot \frac{1}{2}} \end{array} \]
(FPCore (l Om kx ky)
 :precision binary64
 (sqrt
  (*
   (+
    (/
     1.0
     (sqrt
      (+
       (* (+ (pow (sin ky) 2.0) (pow (sin kx) 2.0)) (pow (/ (* l 2.0) Om) 2.0))
       1.0)))
    1.0)
   (/ 1.0 2.0))))
double code(double l, double Om, double kx, double ky) {
	return sqrt((((1.0 / sqrt((((pow(sin(ky), 2.0) + pow(sin(kx), 2.0)) * pow(((l * 2.0) / Om), 2.0)) + 1.0))) + 1.0) * (1.0 / 2.0)));
}

real(8) function code(l, om, kx, ky)
    real(8), intent (in) :: l
    real(8), intent (in) :: om
    real(8), intent (in) :: kx
    real(8), intent (in) :: ky
    code = sqrt((((1.0d0 / sqrt(((((sin(ky) ** 2.0d0) + (sin(kx) ** 2.0d0)) * (((l * 2.0d0) / om) ** 2.0d0)) + 1.0d0))) + 1.0d0) * (1.0d0 / 2.0d0)))
end function

public static double code(double l, double Om, double kx, double ky) {
	return Math.sqrt((((1.0 / Math.sqrt((((Math.pow(Math.sin(ky), 2.0) + Math.pow(Math.sin(kx), 2.0)) * Math.pow(((l * 2.0) / Om), 2.0)) + 1.0))) + 1.0) * (1.0 / 2.0)));
}

def code(l, Om, kx, ky):
	return math.sqrt((((1.0 / math.sqrt((((math.pow(math.sin(ky), 2.0) + math.pow(math.sin(kx), 2.0)) * math.pow(((l * 2.0) / Om), 2.0)) + 1.0))) + 1.0) * (1.0 / 2.0)))

function code(l, Om, kx, ky)
	return sqrt(Float64(Float64(Float64(1.0 / sqrt(Float64(Float64(Float64((sin(ky) ^ 2.0) + (sin(kx) ^ 2.0)) * (Float64(Float64(l * 2.0) / Om) ^ 2.0)) + 1.0))) + 1.0) * Float64(1.0 / 2.0)))
end

function tmp = code(l, Om, kx, ky)
	tmp = sqrt((((1.0 / sqrt(((((sin(ky) ^ 2.0) + (sin(kx) ^ 2.0)) * (((l * 2.0) / Om) ^ 2.0)) + 1.0))) + 1.0) * (1.0 / 2.0)));
end

code[l_, Om_, kx_, ky_] := N[Sqrt[N[(N[(N[(1.0 / N[Sqrt[N[(N[(N[(N[Power[N[Sin[ky], $MachinePrecision], 2.0], $MachinePrecision] + N[Power[N[Sin[kx], $MachinePrecision], 2.0], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] * N[Power[N[(N[(l * 2.0), $MachinePrecision] / Om), $MachinePrecision], 2.0], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + 1.0), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + 1.0), $MachinePrecision] * N[(1.0 / 2.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]

\begin{array}{l}

\\
\sqrt{\left(\frac{1}{\sqrt{\left({\sin ky}^{2} + {\sin kx}^{2}\right) \cdot {\left(\frac{\ell \cdot 2}{Om}\right)}^{2} + 1}} + 1\right) \cdot \frac{1}{2}}
\end{array}
Derivation

  1. Initial program 98.8%

    \[\sqrt{\frac{1}{2} \cdot \left(1 + \frac{1}{\sqrt{1 + {\left(\frac{2 \cdot \ell}{Om}\right)}^{2} \cdot \left({\sin kx}^{2} + {\sin ky}^{2}\right)}}\right)} \]
  2. Add Preprocessing

  3. Final simplification98.8%

    \[\leadsto \sqrt{\left(\frac{1}{\sqrt{\left({\sin ky}^{2} + {\sin kx}^{2}\right) \cdot {\left(\frac{\ell \cdot 2}{Om}\right)}^{2} + 1}} + 1\right) \cdot \frac{1}{2}} \]
  4. Add Preprocessing

Reproduce

?
herbie shell --seed 2024343 
(FPCore (l Om kx ky)
  :name "Toniolo and Linder, Equation (3a)"
  :precision binary64
  (sqrt (* (/ 1.0 2.0) (+ 1.0 (/ 1.0 (sqrt (+ 1.0 (* (pow (/ (* 2.0 l) Om) 2.0) (+ (pow (sin kx) 2.0) (pow (sin ky) 2.0))))))))))