AI.Clustering.Hierarchical.Internal:ward from clustering-0.2.1

Percentage Accurate: 76.4% → 76.4%
Time: 1.9s
Alternatives: 1
Speedup: 1.0×

Specification

?
\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \frac{\left(\left(x + y\right) \cdot z + \left(t + y\right) \cdot a\right) - y \cdot b}{\left(x + t\right) + y} \end{array} \]
(FPCore (x y z t a b)
 :precision binary64
 (/ (- (+ (* (+ x y) z) (* (+ t y) a)) (* y b)) (+ (+ x t) y)))
double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	return ((((x + y) * z) + ((t + y) * a)) - (y * b)) / ((x + t) + y);
}

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    code = ((((x + y) * z) + ((t + y) * a)) - (y * b)) / ((x + t) + y)
end function

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	return ((((x + y) * z) + ((t + y) * a)) - (y * b)) / ((x + t) + y);
}

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b):
	return ((((x + y) * z) + ((t + y) * a)) - (y * b)) / ((x + t) + y)

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(x + y) * z) + Float64(Float64(t + y) * a)) - Float64(y * b)) / Float64(Float64(x + t) + y))
end

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = ((((x + y) * z) + ((t + y) * a)) - (y * b)) / ((x + t) + y);
end

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := N[(N[(N[(N[(N[(x + y), $MachinePrecision] * z), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(t + y), $MachinePrecision] * a), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - N[(y * b), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / N[(N[(x + t), $MachinePrecision] + y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

\begin{array}{l}

\\
\frac{\left(\left(x + y\right) \cdot z + \left(t + y\right) \cdot a\right) - y \cdot b}{\left(x + t\right) + y}
\end{array}

Sampling outcomes in binary64 precision:

Local Percentage Accuracy vs ?

The average percentage accuracy by input value. Horizontal axis shows value of an input variable; the variable is choosen in the title. Vertical axis is accuracy; higher is better. Red represent the original program, while blue represents Herbie's suggestion. These can be toggled with buttons below the plot. The line is an average while dots represent individual samples.

Accuracy vs Speed?

Herbie found 1 alternatives:

AlternativeAccuracySpeedup
The accuracy (vertical axis) and speed (horizontal axis) of each alternatives. Up and to the right is better. The red square shows the initial program, and each blue circle shows an alternative.The line shows the best available speed-accuracy tradeoffs.

Initial Program: 76.4% accurate, 1.0× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \frac{\left(\left(x + y\right) \cdot z + \left(t + y\right) \cdot a\right) - y \cdot b}{\left(x + t\right) + y} \end{array} \]
(FPCore (x y z t a b)
 :precision binary64
 (/ (- (+ (* (+ x y) z) (* (+ t y) a)) (* y b)) (+ (+ x t) y)))
double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	return ((((x + y) * z) + ((t + y) * a)) - (y * b)) / ((x + t) + y);
}

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    code = ((((x + y) * z) + ((t + y) * a)) - (y * b)) / ((x + t) + y)
end function

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	return ((((x + y) * z) + ((t + y) * a)) - (y * b)) / ((x + t) + y);
}

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b):
	return ((((x + y) * z) + ((t + y) * a)) - (y * b)) / ((x + t) + y)

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(x + y) * z) + Float64(Float64(t + y) * a)) - Float64(y * b)) / Float64(Float64(x + t) + y))
end

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = ((((x + y) * z) + ((t + y) * a)) - (y * b)) / ((x + t) + y);
end

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := N[(N[(N[(N[(N[(x + y), $MachinePrecision] * z), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(t + y), $MachinePrecision] * a), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - N[(y * b), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / N[(N[(x + t), $MachinePrecision] + y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

\begin{array}{l}

\\
\frac{\left(\left(x + y\right) \cdot z + \left(t + y\right) \cdot a\right) - y \cdot b}{\left(x + t\right) + y}
\end{array}

Alternative 1: 76.4% accurate, 1.0× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \frac{\left(a \cdot \left(t + y\right) + z \cdot \left(y + x\right)\right) - b \cdot y}{\left(t + x\right) + y} \end{array} \]
(FPCore (x y z t a b)
 :precision binary64
 (/ (- (+ (* a (+ t y)) (* z (+ y x))) (* b y)) (+ (+ t x) y)))
double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	return (((a * (t + y)) + (z * (y + x))) - (b * y)) / ((t + x) + y);
}

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    code = (((a * (t + y)) + (z * (y + x))) - (b * y)) / ((t + x) + y)
end function

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	return (((a * (t + y)) + (z * (y + x))) - (b * y)) / ((t + x) + y);
}

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b):
	return (((a * (t + y)) + (z * (y + x))) - (b * y)) / ((t + x) + y)

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(a * Float64(t + y)) + Float64(z * Float64(y + x))) - Float64(b * y)) / Float64(Float64(t + x) + y))
end

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = (((a * (t + y)) + (z * (y + x))) - (b * y)) / ((t + x) + y);
end

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := N[(N[(N[(N[(a * N[(t + y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * N[(y + x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - N[(b * y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / N[(N[(t + x), $MachinePrecision] + y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

\begin{array}{l}

\\
\frac{\left(a \cdot \left(t + y\right) + z \cdot \left(y + x\right)\right) - b \cdot y}{\left(t + x\right) + y}
\end{array}
Derivation

  1. Initial program 58.4%

    \[\frac{\left(\left(x + y\right) \cdot z + \left(t + y\right) \cdot a\right) - y \cdot b}{\left(x + t\right) + y} \]
  2. Add Preprocessing

  3. Final simplification58.4%

    \[\leadsto \frac{\left(a \cdot \left(t + y\right) + z \cdot \left(y + x\right)\right) - b \cdot y}{\left(t + x\right) + y} \]
  4. Add Preprocessing

Developer Target 1: 74.7% accurate, 0.3× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_1 := \left(x + t\right) + y\\ t_2 := \left(\left(x + y\right) \cdot z + \left(t + y\right) \cdot a\right) - y \cdot b\\ t_3 := \frac{t\_2}{t\_1}\\ t_4 := \left(z + a\right) - b\\ \mathbf{if}\;t\_3 < -3.5813117084150564 \cdot 10^{+153}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_4\\ \mathbf{elif}\;t\_3 < 1.2285964308315609 \cdot 10^{+82}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{1}{\frac{t\_1}{t\_2}}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_4\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]
(FPCore (x y z t a b)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_1 (+ (+ x t) y))
        (t_2 (- (+ (* (+ x y) z) (* (+ t y) a)) (* y b)))
        (t_3 (/ t_2 t_1))
        (t_4 (- (+ z a) b)))
   (if (< t_3 -3.5813117084150564e+153)
     t_4
     (if (< t_3 1.2285964308315609e+82) (/ 1.0 (/ t_1 t_2)) t_4))))
double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double t_1 = (x + t) + y;
	double t_2 = (((x + y) * z) + ((t + y) * a)) - (y * b);
	double t_3 = t_2 / t_1;
	double t_4 = (z + a) - b;
	double tmp;
	if (t_3 < -3.5813117084150564e+153) {
		tmp = t_4;
	} else if (t_3 < 1.2285964308315609e+82) {
		tmp = 1.0 / (t_1 / t_2);
	} else {
		tmp = t_4;
	}
	return tmp;
}

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8) :: t_1
    real(8) :: t_2
    real(8) :: t_3
    real(8) :: t_4
    real(8) :: tmp
    t_1 = (x + t) + y
    t_2 = (((x + y) * z) + ((t + y) * a)) - (y * b)
    t_3 = t_2 / t_1
    t_4 = (z + a) - b
    if (t_3 < (-3.5813117084150564d+153)) then
        tmp = t_4
    else if (t_3 < 1.2285964308315609d+82) then
        tmp = 1.0d0 / (t_1 / t_2)
    else
        tmp = t_4
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double t_1 = (x + t) + y;
	double t_2 = (((x + y) * z) + ((t + y) * a)) - (y * b);
	double t_3 = t_2 / t_1;
	double t_4 = (z + a) - b;
	double tmp;
	if (t_3 < -3.5813117084150564e+153) {
		tmp = t_4;
	} else if (t_3 < 1.2285964308315609e+82) {
		tmp = 1.0 / (t_1 / t_2);
	} else {
		tmp = t_4;
	}
	return tmp;
}

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b):
	t_1 = (x + t) + y
	t_2 = (((x + y) * z) + ((t + y) * a)) - (y * b)
	t_3 = t_2 / t_1
	t_4 = (z + a) - b
	tmp = 0
	if t_3 < -3.5813117084150564e+153:
		tmp = t_4
	elif t_3 < 1.2285964308315609e+82:
		tmp = 1.0 / (t_1 / t_2)
	else:
		tmp = t_4
	return tmp

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	t_1 = Float64(Float64(x + t) + y)
	t_2 = Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(x + y) * z) + Float64(Float64(t + y) * a)) - Float64(y * b))
	t_3 = Float64(t_2 / t_1)
	t_4 = Float64(Float64(z + a) - b)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (t_3 < -3.5813117084150564e+153)
		tmp = t_4;
	elseif (t_3 < 1.2285964308315609e+82)
		tmp = Float64(1.0 / Float64(t_1 / t_2));
	else
		tmp = t_4;
	end
	return tmp
end

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	t_1 = (x + t) + y;
	t_2 = (((x + y) * z) + ((t + y) * a)) - (y * b);
	t_3 = t_2 / t_1;
	t_4 = (z + a) - b;
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (t_3 < -3.5813117084150564e+153)
		tmp = t_4;
	elseif (t_3 < 1.2285964308315609e+82)
		tmp = 1.0 / (t_1 / t_2);
	else
		tmp = t_4;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := Block[{t$95$1 = N[(N[(x + t), $MachinePrecision] + y), $MachinePrecision]}, Block[{t$95$2 = N[(N[(N[(N[(x + y), $MachinePrecision] * z), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(t + y), $MachinePrecision] * a), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - N[(y * b), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, Block[{t$95$3 = N[(t$95$2 / t$95$1), $MachinePrecision]}, Block[{t$95$4 = N[(N[(z + a), $MachinePrecision] - b), $MachinePrecision]}, If[Less[t$95$3, -3.5813117084150564e+153], t$95$4, If[Less[t$95$3, 1.2285964308315609e+82], N[(1.0 / N[(t$95$1 / t$95$2), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], t$95$4]]]]]]

\begin{array}{l}

\\
\begin{array}{l}
t_1 := \left(x + t\right) + y\\
t_2 := \left(\left(x + y\right) \cdot z + \left(t + y\right) \cdot a\right) - y \cdot b\\
t_3 := \frac{t\_2}{t\_1}\\
t_4 := \left(z + a\right) - b\\
\mathbf{if}\;t\_3 < -3.5813117084150564 \cdot 10^{+153}:\\
\;\;\;\;t\_4\\

\mathbf{elif}\;t\_3 < 1.2285964308315609 \cdot 10^{+82}:\\
\;\;\;\;\frac{1}{\frac{t\_1}{t\_2}}\\

\mathbf{else}:\\
\;\;\;\;t\_4\\


\end{array}
\end{array}

Reproduce

?
herbie shell --seed 2024343 
(FPCore (x y z t a b)
  :name "AI.Clustering.Hierarchical.Internal:ward from clustering-0.2.1"
  :precision binary64

  :alt
  (! :herbie-platform default (if (< (/ (- (+ (* (+ x y) z) (* (+ t y) a)) (* y b)) (+ (+ x t) y)) -3581311708415056400000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000) (- (+ z a) b) (if (< (/ (- (+ (* (+ x y) z) (* (+ t y) a)) (* y b)) (+ (+ x t) y)) 12285964308315609000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000) (/ 1 (/ (+ (+ x t) y) (- (+ (* (+ x y) z) (* (+ t y) a)) (* y b)))) (- (+ z a) b))))

  (/ (- (+ (* (+ x y) z) (* (+ t y) a)) (* y b)) (+ (+ x t) y)))