exp2 (problem 3.3.7)

Percentage Accurate: 52.1% → 52.1%
Time: 1.4s
Alternatives: 1
Speedup: 1.0×

Specification

?
\[\left|x\right| \leq 710\]
\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(e^{x} - 2\right) + e^{-x} \end{array} \]
(FPCore (x) :precision binary64 (+ (- (exp x) 2.0) (exp (- x))))
double code(double x) {
	return (exp(x) - 2.0) + exp(-x);
}

real(8) function code(x)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    code = (exp(x) - 2.0d0) + exp(-x)
end function

public static double code(double x) {
	return (Math.exp(x) - 2.0) + Math.exp(-x);
}

def code(x):
	return (math.exp(x) - 2.0) + math.exp(-x)

function code(x)
	return Float64(Float64(exp(x) - 2.0) + exp(Float64(-x)))
end

function tmp = code(x)
	tmp = (exp(x) - 2.0) + exp(-x);
end

code[x_] := N[(N[(N[Exp[x], $MachinePrecision] - 2.0), $MachinePrecision] + N[Exp[(-x)], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

\begin{array}{l}

\\
\left(e^{x} - 2\right) + e^{-x}
\end{array}

Sampling outcomes in binary64 precision:

Local Percentage Accuracy vs ?

The average percentage accuracy by input value. Horizontal axis shows value of an input variable; the variable is choosen in the title. Vertical axis is accuracy; higher is better. Red represent the original program, while blue represents Herbie's suggestion. These can be toggled with buttons below the plot. The line is an average while dots represent individual samples.

Accuracy vs Speed?

Herbie found 1 alternatives:

AlternativeAccuracySpeedup
The accuracy (vertical axis) and speed (horizontal axis) of each alternatives. Up and to the right is better. The red square shows the initial program, and each blue circle shows an alternative.The line shows the best available speed-accuracy tradeoffs.

Initial Program: 52.1% accurate, 1.0× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(e^{x} - 2\right) + e^{-x} \end{array} \]
(FPCore (x) :precision binary64 (+ (- (exp x) 2.0) (exp (- x))))
double code(double x) {
	return (exp(x) - 2.0) + exp(-x);
}

real(8) function code(x)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    code = (exp(x) - 2.0d0) + exp(-x)
end function

public static double code(double x) {
	return (Math.exp(x) - 2.0) + Math.exp(-x);
}

def code(x):
	return (math.exp(x) - 2.0) + math.exp(-x)

function code(x)
	return Float64(Float64(exp(x) - 2.0) + exp(Float64(-x)))
end

function tmp = code(x)
	tmp = (exp(x) - 2.0) + exp(-x);
end

code[x_] := N[(N[(N[Exp[x], $MachinePrecision] - 2.0), $MachinePrecision] + N[Exp[(-x)], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

\begin{array}{l}

\\
\left(e^{x} - 2\right) + e^{-x}
\end{array}

Alternative 1: 52.1% accurate, 1.0× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} x_m = \left|x\right| \\ e^{-x\_m} + \left(e^{x\_m} - 2\right) \end{array} \]
x_m = (fabs.f64 x)
(FPCore (x_m) :precision binary64 (+ (exp (- x_m)) (- (exp x_m) 2.0)))
x_m = fabs(x);
double code(double x_m) {
	return exp(-x_m) + (exp(x_m) - 2.0);
}

x_m = abs(x)
real(8) function code(x_m)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x_m
    code = exp(-x_m) + (exp(x_m) - 2.0d0)
end function

x_m = Math.abs(x);
public static double code(double x_m) {
	return Math.exp(-x_m) + (Math.exp(x_m) - 2.0);
}

x_m = math.fabs(x)
def code(x_m):
	return math.exp(-x_m) + (math.exp(x_m) - 2.0)

x_m = abs(x)
function code(x_m)
	return Float64(exp(Float64(-x_m)) + Float64(exp(x_m) - 2.0))
end

x_m = abs(x);
function tmp = code(x_m)
	tmp = exp(-x_m) + (exp(x_m) - 2.0);
end

x_m = N[Abs[x], $MachinePrecision]
code[x$95$m_] := N[(N[Exp[(-x$95$m)], $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[Exp[x$95$m], $MachinePrecision] - 2.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

\begin{array}{l}
x_m = \left|x\right|

\\
e^{-x\_m} + \left(e^{x\_m} - 2\right)
\end{array}
Derivation

  1. Initial program 54.2%

    \[\left(e^{x} - 2\right) + e^{-x} \]
  2. Add Preprocessing

  3. Final simplification54.2%

    \[\leadsto e^{-x} + \left(e^{x} - 2\right) \]
  4. Add Preprocessing

Developer Target 1: 100.0% accurate, 0.9× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_0 := \sinh \left(\frac{x}{2}\right)\\ 4 \cdot \left(t\_0 \cdot t\_0\right) \end{array} \end{array} \]
(FPCore (x)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_0 (sinh (/ x 2.0)))) (* 4.0 (* t_0 t_0))))
double code(double x) {
	double t_0 = sinh((x / 2.0));
	return 4.0 * (t_0 * t_0);
}

real(8) function code(x)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8) :: t_0
    t_0 = sinh((x / 2.0d0))
    code = 4.0d0 * (t_0 * t_0)
end function

public static double code(double x) {
	double t_0 = Math.sinh((x / 2.0));
	return 4.0 * (t_0 * t_0);
}

def code(x):
	t_0 = math.sinh((x / 2.0))
	return 4.0 * (t_0 * t_0)

function code(x)
	t_0 = sinh(Float64(x / 2.0))
	return Float64(4.0 * Float64(t_0 * t_0))
end

function tmp = code(x)
	t_0 = sinh((x / 2.0));
	tmp = 4.0 * (t_0 * t_0);
end

code[x_] := Block[{t$95$0 = N[Sinh[N[(x / 2.0), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]}, N[(4.0 * N[(t$95$0 * t$95$0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

\begin{array}{l}

\\
\begin{array}{l}
t_0 := \sinh \left(\frac{x}{2}\right)\\
4 \cdot \left(t\_0 \cdot t\_0\right)
\end{array}
\end{array}

Reproduce

?
herbie shell --seed 2024343 
(FPCore (x)
  :name "exp2 (problem 3.3.7)"
  :precision binary64
  :pre (<= (fabs x) 710.0)

  :alt
  (! :herbie-platform default (* 4 (* (sinh (/ x 2)) (sinh (/ x 2)))))

  (+ (- (exp x) 2.0) (exp (- x))))