Optimisation.CirclePacking:place from circle-packing-0.1.0.4, H

Percentage Accurate: 100.0% → 100.0%

Time: 6.2s

Alternatives: 7

Speedup: 1.0×

• 21.1% of points produce a very large (infinite) output. You may want to add a precondition.

Specification

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(x + y\right) \cdot \left(1 - z\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (* (+ x y) (- 1.0 z)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (x + y) * (1.0 - z);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = (x + y) * (1.0d0 - z)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (x + y) * (1.0 - z);
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return (x + y) * (1.0 - z)

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(Float64(x + y) * Float64(1.0 - z))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = (x + y) * (1.0 - z);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(N[(x + y), $MachinePrecision] * N[(1.0 - z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Initial Program: 100.0% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(x + y\right) \cdot \left(1 - z\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (* (+ x y) (- 1.0 z)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (x + y) * (1.0 - z);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = (x + y) * (1.0d0 - z)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (x + y) * (1.0 - z);
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return (x + y) * (1.0 - z)

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(Float64(x + y) * Float64(1.0 - z))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = (x + y) * (1.0 - z);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(N[(x + y), $MachinePrecision] * N[(1.0 - z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Alternative 1: 100.0% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(x + y\right) \cdot \left(1 - z\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (* (+ x y) (- 1.0 z)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (x + y) * (1.0 - z);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = (x + y) * (1.0d0 - z)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (x + y) * (1.0 - z);
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return (x + y) * (1.0 - z)

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(Float64(x + y) * Float64(1.0 - z))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = (x + y) * (1.0 - z);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(N[(x + y), $MachinePrecision] * N[(1.0 - z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 100.0%

   \[\left(x + y\right) \cdot \left(1 - z\right) \]
2. Add Preprocessing
3. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 2: 74.5% accurate, 0.4× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_0 := \left(-z\right) \cdot y\\ \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -105:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_0\\ \mathbf{elif}\;z \leq 3.4 \cdot 10^{-11}:\\ \;\;\;\;y + x\\ \mathbf{elif}\;z \leq 2.45 \cdot 10^{+83}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(1 - z\right) \cdot x\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_0\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_0 (* (- z) y)))
   (if (<= z -105.0)
     t_0
     (if (<= z 3.4e-11) (+ y x) (if (<= z 2.45e+83) (* (- 1.0 z) x) t_0)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double t_0 = -z * y;
	double tmp;
	if (z <= -105.0) {
		tmp = t_0;
	} else if (z <= 3.4e-11) {
		tmp = y + x;
	} else if (z <= 2.45e+83) {
		tmp = (1.0 - z) * x;
	} else {
		tmp = t_0;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: t_0
    real(8) :: tmp
    t_0 = -z * y
    if (z <= (-105.0d0)) then
        tmp = t_0
    else if (z <= 3.4d-11) then
        tmp = y + x
    else if (z <= 2.45d+83) then
        tmp = (1.0d0 - z) * x
    else
        tmp = t_0
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double t_0 = -z * y;
	double tmp;
	if (z <= -105.0) {
		tmp = t_0;
	} else if (z <= 3.4e-11) {
		tmp = y + x;
	} else if (z <= 2.45e+83) {
		tmp = (1.0 - z) * x;
	} else {
		tmp = t_0;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	t_0 = -z * y
	tmp = 0
	if z <= -105.0:
		tmp = t_0
	elif z <= 3.4e-11:
		tmp = y + x
	elif z <= 2.45e+83:
		tmp = (1.0 - z) * x
	else:
		tmp = t_0
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	t_0 = Float64(Float64(-z) * y)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (z <= -105.0)
		tmp = t_0;
	elseif (z <= 3.4e-11)
		tmp = Float64(y + x);
	elseif (z <= 2.45e+83)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(1.0 - z) * x);
	else
		tmp = t_0;
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	t_0 = -z * y;
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (z <= -105.0)
		tmp = t_0;
	elseif (z <= 3.4e-11)
		tmp = y + x;
	elseif (z <= 2.45e+83)
		tmp = (1.0 - z) * x;
	else
		tmp = t_0;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := Block[{t$95$0 = N[((-z) * y), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[z, -105.0], t$95$0, If[LessEqual[z, 3.4e-11], N[(y + x), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[z, 2.45e+83], N[(N[(1.0 - z), $MachinePrecision] * x), $MachinePrecision], t$95$0]]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if z < -105 or 2.44999999999999989e83 < z

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(x + y\right) \cdot \left(1 - z\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(1 - z\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - z\right) \cdot y} \]

      2. lower-*.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - z\right) \cdot y} \]

      3. lower--.f64 48.5

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - z\right)} \cdot y \]

   5. Applied rewrites 48.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - z\right) \cdot y} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in z around inf

      \[\leadsto -1 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z\right)} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

   8. Applied rewrites 48.5%

      \[\leadsto \left(-z\right) \cdot \color{blue}{y} \]

   if -105 < z < 3.3999999999999999e-11

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(x + y\right) \cdot \left(1 - z\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around inf

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(1 - z\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - z\right) \cdot x} \]

      2. lower-*.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - z\right) \cdot x} \]

      3. lower--.f64 54.2

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - z\right)} \cdot x \]

   5. Applied rewrites 54.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - z\right) \cdot x} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

   7. Applied rewrites 54.2%

      \[\leadsto \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(-z, z, 1\right) \cdot x}{\color{blue}{z + 1}} \]

   8. Taylor expanded in z around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + y} \]
   9. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y + x} \]

      2. lower-+.f64 97.9

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y + x} \]

   10. Applied rewrites 97.9%

       \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y + x} \]

   if 3.3999999999999999e-11 < z < 2.44999999999999989e83

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(x + y\right) \cdot \left(1 - z\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around inf

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(1 - z\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - z\right) \cdot x} \]

      2. lower-*.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - z\right) \cdot x} \]

      3. lower--.f64 39.1

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - z\right)} \cdot x \]

   5. Applied rewrites 39.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - z\right) \cdot x} \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.
4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 3: 74.2% accurate, 0.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_0 := \left(-z\right) \cdot y\\ \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -105:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_0\\ \mathbf{elif}\;z \leq 1:\\ \;\;\;\;y + x\\ \mathbf{elif}\;z \leq 2.45 \cdot 10^{+83}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(-z\right) \cdot x\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_0\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_0 (* (- z) y)))
   (if (<= z -105.0)
     t_0
     (if (<= z 1.0) (+ y x) (if (<= z 2.45e+83) (* (- z) x) t_0)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double t_0 = -z * y;
	double tmp;
	if (z <= -105.0) {
		tmp = t_0;
	} else if (z <= 1.0) {
		tmp = y + x;
	} else if (z <= 2.45e+83) {
		tmp = -z * x;
	} else {
		tmp = t_0;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: t_0
    real(8) :: tmp
    t_0 = -z * y
    if (z <= (-105.0d0)) then
        tmp = t_0
    else if (z <= 1.0d0) then
        tmp = y + x
    else if (z <= 2.45d+83) then
        tmp = -z * x
    else
        tmp = t_0
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double t_0 = -z * y;
	double tmp;
	if (z <= -105.0) {
		tmp = t_0;
	} else if (z <= 1.0) {
		tmp = y + x;
	} else if (z <= 2.45e+83) {
		tmp = -z * x;
	} else {
		tmp = t_0;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	t_0 = -z * y
	tmp = 0
	if z <= -105.0:
		tmp = t_0
	elif z <= 1.0:
		tmp = y + x
	elif z <= 2.45e+83:
		tmp = -z * x
	else:
		tmp = t_0
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	t_0 = Float64(Float64(-z) * y)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (z <= -105.0)
		tmp = t_0;
	elseif (z <= 1.0)
		tmp = Float64(y + x);
	elseif (z <= 2.45e+83)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(-z) * x);
	else
		tmp = t_0;
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	t_0 = -z * y;
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (z <= -105.0)
		tmp = t_0;
	elseif (z <= 1.0)
		tmp = y + x;
	elseif (z <= 2.45e+83)
		tmp = -z * x;
	else
		tmp = t_0;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := Block[{t$95$0 = N[((-z) * y), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[z, -105.0], t$95$0, If[LessEqual[z, 1.0], N[(y + x), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[z, 2.45e+83], N[((-z) * x), $MachinePrecision], t$95$0]]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if z < -105 or 2.44999999999999989e83 < z

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(x + y\right) \cdot \left(1 - z\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(1 - z\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - z\right) \cdot y} \]

      2. lower-*.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - z\right) \cdot y} \]

      3. lower--.f64 48.5

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - z\right)} \cdot y \]

   5. Applied rewrites 48.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - z\right) \cdot y} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in z around inf

      \[\leadsto -1 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z\right)} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

   8. Applied rewrites 48.5%

      \[\leadsto \left(-z\right) \cdot \color{blue}{y} \]

   if -105 < z < 1

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(x + y\right) \cdot \left(1 - z\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around inf

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(1 - z\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - z\right) \cdot x} \]

      2. lower-*.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - z\right) \cdot x} \]

      3. lower--.f64 53.7

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - z\right)} \cdot x \]

   5. Applied rewrites 53.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - z\right) \cdot x} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

   7. Applied rewrites 53.8%

      \[\leadsto \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(-z, z, 1\right) \cdot x}{\color{blue}{z + 1}} \]

   8. Taylor expanded in z around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + y} \]
   9. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y + x} \]

      2. lower-+.f64 96.7

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y + x} \]

   10. Applied rewrites 96.7%

       \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y + x} \]

   if 1 < z < 2.44999999999999989e83

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(x + y\right) \cdot \left(1 - z\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around inf

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(1 - z\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - z\right) \cdot x} \]

      2. lower-*.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - z\right) \cdot x} \]

      3. lower--.f64 39.8

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - z\right)} \cdot x \]

   5. Applied rewrites 39.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - z\right) \cdot x} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in z around inf

      \[\leadsto -1 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot z\right)} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

   8. Applied rewrites 39.8%

      \[\leadsto \left(-z\right) \cdot \color{blue}{x} \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.
4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 4: 75.2% accurate, 0.6× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -2100000 \lor \neg \left(z \leq 1\right):\\ \;\;\;\;\left(-z\right) \cdot x\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;y + x\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= z -2100000.0) (not (<= z 1.0))) (* (- z) x) (+ y x)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z <= -2100000.0) || !(z <= 1.0)) {
		tmp = -z * x;
	} else {
		tmp = y + x;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((z <= (-2100000.0d0)) .or. (.not. (z <= 1.0d0))) then
        tmp = -z * x
    else
        tmp = y + x
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z <= -2100000.0) || !(z <= 1.0)) {
		tmp = -z * x;
	} else {
		tmp = y + x;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if (z <= -2100000.0) or not (z <= 1.0):
		tmp = -z * x
	else:
		tmp = y + x
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((z <= -2100000.0) || !(z <= 1.0))
		tmp = Float64(Float64(-z) * x);
	else
		tmp = Float64(y + x);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((z <= -2100000.0) || ~((z <= 1.0)))
		tmp = -z * x;
	else
		tmp = y + x;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[Or[LessEqual[z, -2100000.0], N[Not[LessEqual[z, 1.0]], $MachinePrecision]], N[((-z) * x), $MachinePrecision], N[(y + x), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if z < -2.1e6 or 1 < z

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(x + y\right) \cdot \left(1 - z\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around inf

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(1 - z\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - z\right) \cdot x} \]

      2. lower-*.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - z\right) \cdot x} \]

      3. lower--.f64 56.2

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - z\right)} \cdot x \]

   5. Applied rewrites 56.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - z\right) \cdot x} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in z around inf

      \[\leadsto -1 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot z\right)} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

   8. Applied rewrites 56.2%

      \[\leadsto \left(-z\right) \cdot \color{blue}{x} \]

   if -2.1e6 < z < 1

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(x + y\right) \cdot \left(1 - z\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around inf

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(1 - z\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - z\right) \cdot x} \]

      2. lower-*.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - z\right) \cdot x} \]

      3. lower--.f64 54.1

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - z\right)} \cdot x \]

   5. Applied rewrites 54.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - z\right) \cdot x} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

   7. Applied rewrites 54.1%

      \[\leadsto \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(-z, z, 1\right) \cdot x}{\color{blue}{z + 1}} \]

   8. Taylor expanded in z around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + y} \]
   9. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y + x} \]

      2. lower-+.f64 96.1

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y + x} \]

   10. Applied rewrites 96.1%

       \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y + x} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 76.3%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -2100000 \lor \neg \left(z \leq 1\right):\\ \;\;\;\;\left(-z\right) \cdot x\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;y + x\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 5: 51.5% accurate, 0.7× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x + y \leq -1 \cdot 10^{-299}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(-z, x, x\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(1 - z\right) \cdot y\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= (+ x y) -1e-299) (fma (- z) x x) (* (- 1.0 z) y)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x + y) <= -1e-299) {
		tmp = fma(-z, x, x);
	} else {
		tmp = (1.0 - z) * y;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (Float64(x + y) <= -1e-299)
		tmp = fma(Float64(-z), x, x);
	else
		tmp = Float64(Float64(1.0 - z) * y);
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[LessEqual[N[(x + y), $MachinePrecision], -1e-299], N[((-z) * x + x), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[(1.0 - z), $MachinePrecision] * y), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (+.f64 x y) < -9.99999999999999992e-300

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(x + y\right) \cdot \left(1 - z\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around inf

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(1 - z\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - z\right) \cdot x} \]

      2. lower-*.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - z\right) \cdot x} \]

      3. lower--.f64 55.5

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - z\right)} \cdot x \]

   5. Applied rewrites 55.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - z\right) \cdot x} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

   7. Applied rewrites 52.5%

      \[\leadsto \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(-z, z, 1\right) \cdot x}{\color{blue}{z + 1}} \]
   8. Step-by-step derivation

   9. Applied rewrites 55.6%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(-z\right)} \]
   10. Step-by-step derivation

   11. Applied rewrites 55.6%

       \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(-z, \color{blue}{x}, x\right) \]

   if -9.99999999999999992e-300 < (+.f64 x y)

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(x + y\right) \cdot \left(1 - z\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(1 - z\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - z\right) \cdot y} \]

      2. lower-*.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - z\right) \cdot y} \]

      3. lower--.f64 48.4

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - z\right)} \cdot y \]

   5. Applied rewrites 48.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - z\right) \cdot y} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 6: 51.5% accurate, 0.7× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x + y \leq -1 \cdot 10^{-299}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(1 - z\right) \cdot x\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(1 - z\right) \cdot y\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= (+ x y) -1e-299) (* (- 1.0 z) x) (* (- 1.0 z) y)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x + y) <= -1e-299) {
		tmp = (1.0 - z) * x;
	} else {
		tmp = (1.0 - z) * y;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((x + y) <= (-1d-299)) then
        tmp = (1.0d0 - z) * x
    else
        tmp = (1.0d0 - z) * y
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x + y) <= -1e-299) {
		tmp = (1.0 - z) * x;
	} else {
		tmp = (1.0 - z) * y;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if (x + y) <= -1e-299:
		tmp = (1.0 - z) * x
	else:
		tmp = (1.0 - z) * y
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (Float64(x + y) <= -1e-299)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(1.0 - z) * x);
	else
		tmp = Float64(Float64(1.0 - z) * y);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((x + y) <= -1e-299)
		tmp = (1.0 - z) * x;
	else
		tmp = (1.0 - z) * y;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[LessEqual[N[(x + y), $MachinePrecision], -1e-299], N[(N[(1.0 - z), $MachinePrecision] * x), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[(1.0 - z), $MachinePrecision] * y), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (+.f64 x y) < -9.99999999999999992e-300

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(x + y\right) \cdot \left(1 - z\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around inf

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(1 - z\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - z\right) \cdot x} \]

      2. lower-*.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - z\right) \cdot x} \]

      3. lower--.f64 55.5

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - z\right)} \cdot x \]

   5. Applied rewrites 55.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - z\right) \cdot x} \]

   if -9.99999999999999992e-300 < (+.f64 x y)

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(x + y\right) \cdot \left(1 - z\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(1 - z\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - z\right) \cdot y} \]

      2. lower-*.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - z\right) \cdot y} \]

      3. lower--.f64 48.4

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - z\right)} \cdot y \]

   5. Applied rewrites 48.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - z\right) \cdot y} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 7: 50.2% accurate, 3.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ y + x \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (+ y x))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return y + x;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = y + x
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return y + x;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return y + x

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(y + x)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = y + x;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(y + x), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 100.0%

   \[\left(x + y\right) \cdot \left(1 - z\right) \]
2. Add Preprocessing

3. Taylor expanded in x around inf

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(1 - z\right)} \]
4. Step-by-step derivation

   1. *-commutative N/A

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - z\right) \cdot x} \]

   2. lower-*.f64 N/A

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - z\right) \cdot x} \]

   3. lower--.f64 55.1

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - z\right)} \cdot x \]

5. Applied rewrites 55.1%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - z\right) \cdot x} \]
6. Step-by-step derivation

7. Applied rewrites 51.8%

   \[\leadsto \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(-z, z, 1\right) \cdot x}{\color{blue}{z + 1}} \]

8. Taylor expanded in z around 0

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + y} \]
9. Step-by-step derivation

   1. +-commutative N/A

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y + x} \]

   2. lower-+.f64 50.3

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y + x} \]

10. Applied rewrites 50.3%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y + x} \]
11. Add Preprocessing

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2024340 
(FPCore (x y z)
  :name "Optimisation.CirclePacking:place from circle-packing-0.1.0.4, H"
  :precision binary64
  (* (+ x y) (- 1.0 z)))