Graphics.Rasterific.CubicBezier:cachedBezierAt from Rasterific-0.6.1

Percentage Accurate: 92.6% → 96.8%

Time: 7.3s

Alternatives: 10

Speedup: 0.8×

• 32.2% of points produce a very large (infinite) output. You may want to add a precondition.

Specification

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b)
 :precision binary64
 (+ (+ (+ x (* y z)) (* t a)) (* (* a z) b)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	return ((x + (y * z)) + (t * a)) + ((a * z) * b);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    code = ((x + (y * z)) + (t * a)) + ((a * z) * b)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	return ((x + (y * z)) + (t * a)) + ((a * z) * b);
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b):
	return ((x + (y * z)) + (t * a)) + ((a * z) * b)

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(x + Float64(y * z)) + Float64(t * a)) + Float64(Float64(a * z) * b))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = ((x + (y * z)) + (t * a)) + ((a * z) * b);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := N[(N[(N[(x + N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(t * a), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(a * z), $MachinePrecision] * b), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Initial Program: 92.6% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b)
 :precision binary64
 (+ (+ (+ x (* y z)) (* t a)) (* (* a z) b)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	return ((x + (y * z)) + (t * a)) + ((a * z) * b);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    code = ((x + (y * z)) + (t * a)) + ((a * z) * b)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	return ((x + (y * z)) + (t * a)) + ((a * z) * b);
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b):
	return ((x + (y * z)) + (t * a)) + ((a * z) * b)

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(x + Float64(y * z)) + Float64(t * a)) + Float64(Float64(a * z) * b))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = ((x + (y * z)) + (t * a)) + ((a * z) * b);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := N[(N[(N[(x + N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(t * a), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(a * z), $MachinePrecision] * b), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Alternative 1: 96.8% accurate, 0.3× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_1 := \left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b\\ \mathbf{if}\;t\_1 \leq -\infty:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(b, z, t\right), a, z \cdot y\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;t\_1 \leq \infty:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_1\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(b, z, t\right) \cdot a\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_1 (+ (+ (+ x (* y z)) (* t a)) (* (* a z) b))))
   (if (<= t_1 (- INFINITY))
     (fma (fma b z t) a (* z y))
     (if (<= t_1 INFINITY) t_1 (* (fma b z t) a)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double t_1 = ((x + (y * z)) + (t * a)) + ((a * z) * b);
	double tmp;
	if (t_1 <= -((double) INFINITY)) {
		tmp = fma(fma(b, z, t), a, (z * y));
	} else if (t_1 <= ((double) INFINITY)) {
		tmp = t_1;
	} else {
		tmp = fma(b, z, t) * a;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	t_1 = Float64(Float64(Float64(x + Float64(y * z)) + Float64(t * a)) + Float64(Float64(a * z) * b))
	tmp = 0.0
	if (t_1 <= Float64(-Inf))
		tmp = fma(fma(b, z, t), a, Float64(z * y));
	elseif (t_1 <= Inf)
		tmp = t_1;
	else
		tmp = Float64(fma(b, z, t) * a);
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := Block[{t$95$1 = N[(N[(N[(x + N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(t * a), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(a * z), $MachinePrecision] * b), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[t$95$1, (-Infinity)], N[(N[(b * z + t), $MachinePrecision] * a + N[(z * y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[t$95$1, Infinity], t$95$1, N[(N[(b * z + t), $MachinePrecision] * a), $MachinePrecision]]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if (+.f64 (+.f64 (+.f64 x (*.f64 y z)) (*.f64 t a)) (*.f64 (*.f64 a z) b)) < -inf.0

   1. Initial program 83.1%

      \[\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot t + \left(a \cdot \left(b \cdot z\right) + y \cdot z\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+r+ N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(a \cdot t + a \cdot \left(b \cdot z\right)\right) + y \cdot z} \]

      2. distribute-lft-in N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(t + b \cdot z\right)} + y \cdot z \]

      3. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(t + b \cdot z\right) \cdot a} + y \cdot z \]

      4. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(t + b \cdot z, a, y \cdot z\right)} \]

      5. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{b \cdot z + t}, a, y \cdot z\right) \]

      6. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, z, t\right)}, a, y \cdot z\right) \]

      7. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(b, z, t\right), a, \color{blue}{z \cdot y}\right) \]

      8. lower-*.f64 97.1

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(b, z, t\right), a, \color{blue}{z \cdot y}\right) \]

   5. Applied rewrites 97.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(b, z, t\right), a, z \cdot y\right)} \]

   if -inf.0 < (+.f64 (+.f64 (+.f64 x (*.f64 y z)) (*.f64 t a)) (*.f64 (*.f64 a z) b)) < +inf.0

   1. Initial program 98.2%

      \[\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   if +inf.0 < (+.f64 (+.f64 (+.f64 x (*.f64 y z)) (*.f64 t a)) (*.f64 (*.f64 a z) b))

   1. Initial program 0.0%

      \[\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in a around inf

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(t + b \cdot z\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(t + b \cdot z\right) \cdot a} \]

      2. lower-*.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(t + b \cdot z\right) \cdot a} \]

      3. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(b \cdot z + t\right)} \cdot a \]

      4. lower-fma.f64 90.9

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, z, t\right)} \cdot a \]

   5. Applied rewrites 90.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, z, t\right) \cdot a} \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.
4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 2: 95.9% accurate, 0.8× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;a \leq -1.1 \cdot 10^{+59} \lor \neg \left(a \leq 7 \cdot 10^{+156}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(b, z, t\right), a, x\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(b \cdot a, z, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, t, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, y, x\right)\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= a -1.1e+59) (not (<= a 7e+156)))
   (fma (fma b z t) a x)
   (fma (* b a) z (fma a t (fma z y x)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if ((a <= -1.1e+59) || !(a <= 7e+156)) {
		tmp = fma(fma(b, z, t), a, x);
	} else {
		tmp = fma((b * a), z, fma(a, t, fma(z, y, x)));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((a <= -1.1e+59) || !(a <= 7e+156))
		tmp = fma(fma(b, z, t), a, x);
	else
		tmp = fma(Float64(b * a), z, fma(a, t, fma(z, y, x)));
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := If[Or[LessEqual[a, -1.1e+59], N[Not[LessEqual[a, 7e+156]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(N[(b * z + t), $MachinePrecision] * a + x), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[(b * a), $MachinePrecision] * z + N[(a * t + N[(z * y + x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if a < -1.1e59 or 7.0000000000000006e156 < a

   1. Initial program 81.5%

      \[\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in y around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \left(a \cdot t + a \cdot \left(b \cdot z\right)\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. distribute-lft-in N/A

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(t + b \cdot z\right)} \]

      2. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(t + b \cdot z\right) + x} \]

      3. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(t + b \cdot z\right) \cdot a} + x \]

      4. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(t + b \cdot z, a, x\right)} \]

      5. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{b \cdot z + t}, a, x\right) \]

      6. lower-fma.f64 94.6

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, z, t\right)}, a, x\right) \]

   5. Applied rewrites 94.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(b, z, t\right), a, x\right)} \]

   if -1.1e59 < a < 7.0000000000000006e156

   1. Initial program 97.7%

      \[\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Add Preprocessing
   3. Step-by-step derivation

      1. lift-+.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b} \]

      2. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b + \left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right)} \]

      3. lift-*.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b} + \left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) \]

      4. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{b \cdot \left(a \cdot z\right)} + \left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) \]

      5. lift-*.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto b \cdot \color{blue}{\left(a \cdot z\right)} + \left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) \]

      6. associate-*r* N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(b \cdot a\right) \cdot z} + \left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) \]

      7. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b \cdot a, z, \left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right)} \]

      8. lower-*.f64 97.7

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{b \cdot a}, z, \left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) \]

      9. lift-+.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(b \cdot a, z, \color{blue}{\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a}\right) \]

      10. +-commutative N/A

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(b \cdot a, z, \color{blue}{t \cdot a + \left(x + y \cdot z\right)}\right) \]

      11. lift-*.f64 N/A

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(b \cdot a, z, \color{blue}{t \cdot a} + \left(x + y \cdot z\right)\right) \]

      12. *-commutative N/A

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(b \cdot a, z, \color{blue}{a \cdot t} + \left(x + y \cdot z\right)\right) \]

      13. lower-fma.f64 97.7

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(b \cdot a, z, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(a, t, x + y \cdot z\right)}\right) \]

      14. lift-+.f64 N/A

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(b \cdot a, z, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, t, \color{blue}{x + y \cdot z}\right)\right) \]

      15. +-commutative N/A

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(b \cdot a, z, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, t, \color{blue}{y \cdot z + x}\right)\right) \]

      16. lift-*.f64 N/A

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(b \cdot a, z, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, t, \color{blue}{y \cdot z} + x\right)\right) \]

      17. *-commutative N/A

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(b \cdot a, z, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, t, \color{blue}{z \cdot y} + x\right)\right) \]

      18. lower-fma.f64 97.7

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(b \cdot a, z, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, t, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, y, x\right)}\right)\right) \]

   4. Applied rewrites 97.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b \cdot a, z, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, t, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, y, x\right)\right)\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 96.6%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;a \leq -1.1 \cdot 10^{+59} \lor \neg \left(a \leq 7 \cdot 10^{+156}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(b, z, t\right), a, x\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(b \cdot a, z, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, t, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, y, x\right)\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 3: 84.2% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -2.9 \cdot 10^{+62} \lor \neg \left(x \leq 3800000000\right):\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(b, z, t\right), a, x\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(b, z, t\right), a, z \cdot y\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= x -2.9e+62) (not (<= x 3800000000.0)))
   (fma (fma b z t) a x)
   (fma (fma b z t) a (* z y))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x <= -2.9e+62) || !(x <= 3800000000.0)) {
		tmp = fma(fma(b, z, t), a, x);
	} else {
		tmp = fma(fma(b, z, t), a, (z * y));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((x <= -2.9e+62) || !(x <= 3800000000.0))
		tmp = fma(fma(b, z, t), a, x);
	else
		tmp = fma(fma(b, z, t), a, Float64(z * y));
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := If[Or[LessEqual[x, -2.9e+62], N[Not[LessEqual[x, 3800000000.0]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(N[(b * z + t), $MachinePrecision] * a + x), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[(b * z + t), $MachinePrecision] * a + N[(z * y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if x < -2.89999999999999984e62 or 3.8e9 < x

   1. Initial program 92.9%

      \[\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in y around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \left(a \cdot t + a \cdot \left(b \cdot z\right)\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. distribute-lft-in N/A

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(t + b \cdot z\right)} \]

      2. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(t + b \cdot z\right) + x} \]

      3. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(t + b \cdot z\right) \cdot a} + x \]

      4. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(t + b \cdot z, a, x\right)} \]

      5. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{b \cdot z + t}, a, x\right) \]

      6. lower-fma.f64 88.1

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, z, t\right)}, a, x\right) \]

   5. Applied rewrites 88.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(b, z, t\right), a, x\right)} \]

   if -2.89999999999999984e62 < x < 3.8e9

   1. Initial program 91.3%

      \[\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot t + \left(a \cdot \left(b \cdot z\right) + y \cdot z\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+r+ N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(a \cdot t + a \cdot \left(b \cdot z\right)\right) + y \cdot z} \]

      2. distribute-lft-in N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(t + b \cdot z\right)} + y \cdot z \]

      3. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(t + b \cdot z\right) \cdot a} + y \cdot z \]

      4. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(t + b \cdot z, a, y \cdot z\right)} \]

      5. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{b \cdot z + t}, a, y \cdot z\right) \]

      6. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, z, t\right)}, a, y \cdot z\right) \]

      7. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(b, z, t\right), a, \color{blue}{z \cdot y}\right) \]

      8. lower-*.f64 92.8

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(b, z, t\right), a, \color{blue}{z \cdot y}\right) \]

   5. Applied rewrites 92.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(b, z, t\right), a, z \cdot y\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 90.8%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -2.9 \cdot 10^{+62} \lor \neg \left(x \leq 3800000000\right):\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(b, z, t\right), a, x\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(b, z, t\right), a, z \cdot y\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 4: 72.9% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_1 := \mathsf{fma}\left(b, z, t\right) \cdot a\\ \mathbf{if}\;a \leq -1.05 \cdot 10^{+23}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_1\\ \mathbf{elif}\;a \leq -5.8 \cdot 10^{-108}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(a, t, x\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;a \leq 1.6 \cdot 10^{+37}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(z, y, x\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_1\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_1 (* (fma b z t) a)))
   (if (<= a -1.05e+23)
     t_1
     (if (<= a -5.8e-108) (fma a t x) (if (<= a 1.6e+37) (fma z y x) t_1)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double t_1 = fma(b, z, t) * a;
	double tmp;
	if (a <= -1.05e+23) {
		tmp = t_1;
	} else if (a <= -5.8e-108) {
		tmp = fma(a, t, x);
	} else if (a <= 1.6e+37) {
		tmp = fma(z, y, x);
	} else {
		tmp = t_1;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	t_1 = Float64(fma(b, z, t) * a)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (a <= -1.05e+23)
		tmp = t_1;
	elseif (a <= -5.8e-108)
		tmp = fma(a, t, x);
	elseif (a <= 1.6e+37)
		tmp = fma(z, y, x);
	else
		tmp = t_1;
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := Block[{t$95$1 = N[(N[(b * z + t), $MachinePrecision] * a), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[a, -1.05e+23], t$95$1, If[LessEqual[a, -5.8e-108], N[(a * t + x), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[a, 1.6e+37], N[(z * y + x), $MachinePrecision], t$95$1]]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if a < -1.0500000000000001e23 or 1.60000000000000007e37 < a

   1. Initial program 83.5%

      \[\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in a around inf

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(t + b \cdot z\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(t + b \cdot z\right) \cdot a} \]

      2. lower-*.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(t + b \cdot z\right) \cdot a} \]

      3. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(b \cdot z + t\right)} \cdot a \]

      4. lower-fma.f64 79.7

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, z, t\right)} \cdot a \]

   5. Applied rewrites 79.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, z, t\right) \cdot a} \]

   if -1.0500000000000001e23 < a < -5.8000000000000002e-108

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in y around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \left(a \cdot t + a \cdot \left(b \cdot z\right)\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. distribute-lft-in N/A

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(t + b \cdot z\right)} \]

      2. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(t + b \cdot z\right) + x} \]

      3. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(t + b \cdot z\right) \cdot a} + x \]

      4. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(t + b \cdot z, a, x\right)} \]

      5. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{b \cdot z + t}, a, x\right) \]

      6. lower-fma.f64 91.2

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, z, t\right)}, a, x\right) \]

   5. Applied rewrites 91.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(b, z, t\right), a, x\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in z around inf

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(b \cdot z, a, x\right) \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

   8. Applied rewrites 49.6%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z \cdot b, a, x\right) \]

   9. Taylor expanded in z around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + a \cdot t} \]
   10. Step-by-step derivation

       1. +-commutative N/A

          \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot t + x} \]

       2. lower-fma.f64 86.5

          \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(a, t, x\right)} \]

   11. Applied rewrites 86.5%

       \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(a, t, x\right)} \]

   if -5.8000000000000002e-108 < a < 1.60000000000000007e37

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in y around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \left(a \cdot t + a \cdot \left(b \cdot z\right)\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. distribute-lft-in N/A

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(t + b \cdot z\right)} \]

      2. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(t + b \cdot z\right) + x} \]

      3. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(t + b \cdot z\right) \cdot a} + x \]

      4. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(t + b \cdot z, a, x\right)} \]

      5. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{b \cdot z + t}, a, x\right) \]

      6. lower-fma.f64 54.8

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, z, t\right)}, a, x\right) \]

   5. Applied rewrites 54.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(b, z, t\right), a, x\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in z around inf

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(b \cdot z, a, x\right) \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

   8. Applied rewrites 44.3%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z \cdot b, a, x\right) \]

   9. Taylor expanded in a around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + y \cdot z} \]
   10. Step-by-step derivation

       1. +-commutative N/A

          \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot z + x} \]

       2. *-commutative N/A

          \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot y} + x \]

       3. lower-fma.f64 83.4

          \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, y, x\right)} \]

   11. Applied rewrites 83.4%

       \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, y, x\right)} \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.
4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 5: 85.9% accurate, 1.2× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;a \leq -6.1 \cdot 10^{-108} \lor \neg \left(a \leq 1.2 \cdot 10^{-7}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(b, z, t\right), a, x\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, y\right), z, x\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= a -6.1e-108) (not (<= a 1.2e-7)))
   (fma (fma b z t) a x)
   (fma (fma b a y) z x)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if ((a <= -6.1e-108) || !(a <= 1.2e-7)) {
		tmp = fma(fma(b, z, t), a, x);
	} else {
		tmp = fma(fma(b, a, y), z, x);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((a <= -6.1e-108) || !(a <= 1.2e-7))
		tmp = fma(fma(b, z, t), a, x);
	else
		tmp = fma(fma(b, a, y), z, x);
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := If[Or[LessEqual[a, -6.1e-108], N[Not[LessEqual[a, 1.2e-7]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(N[(b * z + t), $MachinePrecision] * a + x), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[(b * a + y), $MachinePrecision] * z + x), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if a < -6.10000000000000007e-108 or 1.19999999999999989e-7 < a

   1. Initial program 86.5%

      \[\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in y around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \left(a \cdot t + a \cdot \left(b \cdot z\right)\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. distribute-lft-in N/A

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(t + b \cdot z\right)} \]

      2. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(t + b \cdot z\right) + x} \]

      3. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(t + b \cdot z\right) \cdot a} + x \]

      4. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(t + b \cdot z, a, x\right)} \]

      5. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{b \cdot z + t}, a, x\right) \]

      6. lower-fma.f64 90.2

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, z, t\right)}, a, x\right) \]

   5. Applied rewrites 90.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(b, z, t\right), a, x\right)} \]

   if -6.10000000000000007e-108 < a < 1.19999999999999989e-7

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in t around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \left(a \cdot \left(b \cdot z\right) + y \cdot z\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(a \cdot \left(b \cdot z\right) + y \cdot z\right) + x} \]

      2. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z + a \cdot \left(b \cdot z\right)\right)} + x \]

      3. associate-*r* N/A

         \[\leadsto \left(y \cdot z + \color{blue}{\left(a \cdot b\right) \cdot z}\right) + x \]

      4. distribute-rgt-in N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(y + a \cdot b\right)} + x \]

      5. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y + a \cdot b\right) \cdot z} + x \]

      6. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y + a \cdot b, z, x\right)} \]

      7. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{a \cdot b + y}, z, x\right) \]

      8. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{b \cdot a} + y, z, x\right) \]

      9. lower-fma.f64 91.7

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, y\right)}, z, x\right) \]

   5. Applied rewrites 91.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, y\right), z, x\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 90.8%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;a \leq -6.1 \cdot 10^{-108} \lor \neg \left(a \leq 1.2 \cdot 10^{-7}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(b, z, t\right), a, x\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, y\right), z, x\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 6: 82.0% accurate, 1.2× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;a \leq -7.5 \cdot 10^{+57} \lor \neg \left(a \leq 1.45 \cdot 10^{+40}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(b, z, t\right) \cdot a\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, y\right), z, x\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= a -7.5e+57) (not (<= a 1.45e+40)))
   (* (fma b z t) a)
   (fma (fma b a y) z x)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if ((a <= -7.5e+57) || !(a <= 1.45e+40)) {
		tmp = fma(b, z, t) * a;
	} else {
		tmp = fma(fma(b, a, y), z, x);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((a <= -7.5e+57) || !(a <= 1.45e+40))
		tmp = Float64(fma(b, z, t) * a);
	else
		tmp = fma(fma(b, a, y), z, x);
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := If[Or[LessEqual[a, -7.5e+57], N[Not[LessEqual[a, 1.45e+40]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(N[(b * z + t), $MachinePrecision] * a), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[(b * a + y), $MachinePrecision] * z + x), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if a < -7.5000000000000006e57 or 1.45000000000000009e40 < a

   1. Initial program 83.0%

      \[\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in a around inf

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(t + b \cdot z\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(t + b \cdot z\right) \cdot a} \]

      2. lower-*.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(t + b \cdot z\right) \cdot a} \]

      3. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(b \cdot z + t\right)} \cdot a \]

      4. lower-fma.f64 83.2

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, z, t\right)} \cdot a \]

   5. Applied rewrites 83.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, z, t\right) \cdot a} \]

   if -7.5000000000000006e57 < a < 1.45000000000000009e40

   1. Initial program 98.7%

      \[\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in t around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \left(a \cdot \left(b \cdot z\right) + y \cdot z\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(a \cdot \left(b \cdot z\right) + y \cdot z\right) + x} \]

      2. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z + a \cdot \left(b \cdot z\right)\right)} + x \]

      3. associate-*r* N/A

         \[\leadsto \left(y \cdot z + \color{blue}{\left(a \cdot b\right) \cdot z}\right) + x \]

      4. distribute-rgt-in N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(y + a \cdot b\right)} + x \]

      5. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y + a \cdot b\right) \cdot z} + x \]

      6. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y + a \cdot b, z, x\right)} \]

      7. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{a \cdot b + y}, z, x\right) \]

      8. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{b \cdot a} + y, z, x\right) \]

      9. lower-fma.f64 84.9

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, y\right)}, z, x\right) \]

   5. Applied rewrites 84.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, y\right), z, x\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 84.2%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;a \leq -7.5 \cdot 10^{+57} \lor \neg \left(a \leq 1.45 \cdot 10^{+40}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(b, z, t\right) \cdot a\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, y\right), z, x\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 7: 73.6% accurate, 1.2× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -1.55 \cdot 10^{-46} \lor \neg \left(z \leq 8.5 \cdot 10^{-10}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, y\right) \cdot z\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(a, t, x\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= z -1.55e-46) (not (<= z 8.5e-10))) (* (fma b a y) z) (fma a t x)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z <= -1.55e-46) || !(z <= 8.5e-10)) {
		tmp = fma(b, a, y) * z;
	} else {
		tmp = fma(a, t, x);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((z <= -1.55e-46) || !(z <= 8.5e-10))
		tmp = Float64(fma(b, a, y) * z);
	else
		tmp = fma(a, t, x);
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := If[Or[LessEqual[z, -1.55e-46], N[Not[LessEqual[z, 8.5e-10]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(N[(b * a + y), $MachinePrecision] * z), $MachinePrecision], N[(a * t + x), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if z < -1.55e-46 or 8.4999999999999996e-10 < z

   1. Initial program 85.1%

      \[\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in z around inf

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(y + a \cdot b\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y + a \cdot b\right) \cdot z} \]

      2. lower-*.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y + a \cdot b\right) \cdot z} \]

      3. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(a \cdot b + y\right)} \cdot z \]

      4. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{b \cdot a} + y\right) \cdot z \]

      5. lower-fma.f64 74.7

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, y\right)} \cdot z \]

   5. Applied rewrites 74.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, y\right) \cdot z} \]

   if -1.55e-46 < z < 8.4999999999999996e-10

   1. Initial program 99.1%

      \[\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in y around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \left(a \cdot t + a \cdot \left(b \cdot z\right)\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. distribute-lft-in N/A

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(t + b \cdot z\right)} \]

      2. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(t + b \cdot z\right) + x} \]

      3. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(t + b \cdot z\right) \cdot a} + x \]

      4. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(t + b \cdot z, a, x\right)} \]

      5. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{b \cdot z + t}, a, x\right) \]

      6. lower-fma.f64 91.5

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, z, t\right)}, a, x\right) \]

   5. Applied rewrites 91.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(b, z, t\right), a, x\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in z around inf

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(b \cdot z, a, x\right) \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

   8. Applied rewrites 51.5%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z \cdot b, a, x\right) \]

   9. Taylor expanded in z around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + a \cdot t} \]
   10. Step-by-step derivation

       1. +-commutative N/A

          \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot t + x} \]

       2. lower-fma.f64 80.1

          \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(a, t, x\right)} \]

   11. Applied rewrites 80.1%

       \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(a, t, x\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 77.3%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -1.55 \cdot 10^{-46} \lor \neg \left(z \leq 8.5 \cdot 10^{-10}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, y\right) \cdot z\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(a, t, x\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 8: 62.3% accurate, 1.6× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;a \leq -5.8 \cdot 10^{-108} \lor \neg \left(a \leq 7.2 \cdot 10^{-27}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(a, t, x\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(z, y, x\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= a -5.8e-108) (not (<= a 7.2e-27))) (fma a t x) (fma z y x)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if ((a <= -5.8e-108) || !(a <= 7.2e-27)) {
		tmp = fma(a, t, x);
	} else {
		tmp = fma(z, y, x);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((a <= -5.8e-108) || !(a <= 7.2e-27))
		tmp = fma(a, t, x);
	else
		tmp = fma(z, y, x);
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := If[Or[LessEqual[a, -5.8e-108], N[Not[LessEqual[a, 7.2e-27]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(a * t + x), $MachinePrecision], N[(z * y + x), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if a < -5.8000000000000002e-108 or 7.1999999999999997e-27 < a

   1. Initial program 86.7%

      \[\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in y around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \left(a \cdot t + a \cdot \left(b \cdot z\right)\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. distribute-lft-in N/A

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(t + b \cdot z\right)} \]

      2. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(t + b \cdot z\right) + x} \]

      3. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(t + b \cdot z\right) \cdot a} + x \]

      4. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(t + b \cdot z, a, x\right)} \]

      5. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{b \cdot z + t}, a, x\right) \]

      6. lower-fma.f64 89.7

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, z, t\right)}, a, x\right) \]

   5. Applied rewrites 89.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(b, z, t\right), a, x\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in z around inf

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(b \cdot z, a, x\right) \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

   8. Applied rewrites 47.7%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z \cdot b, a, x\right) \]

   9. Taylor expanded in z around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + a \cdot t} \]
   10. Step-by-step derivation

       1. +-commutative N/A

          \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot t + x} \]

       2. lower-fma.f64 61.4

          \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(a, t, x\right)} \]

   11. Applied rewrites 61.4%

       \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(a, t, x\right)} \]

   if -5.8000000000000002e-108 < a < 7.1999999999999997e-27

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in y around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \left(a \cdot t + a \cdot \left(b \cdot z\right)\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. distribute-lft-in N/A

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(t + b \cdot z\right)} \]

      2. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(t + b \cdot z\right) + x} \]

      3. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(t + b \cdot z\right) \cdot a} + x \]

      4. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(t + b \cdot z, a, x\right)} \]

      5. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{b \cdot z + t}, a, x\right) \]

      6. lower-fma.f64 52.7

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, z, t\right)}, a, x\right) \]

   5. Applied rewrites 52.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(b, z, t\right), a, x\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in z around inf

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(b \cdot z, a, x\right) \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

   8. Applied rewrites 45.2%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z \cdot b, a, x\right) \]

   9. Taylor expanded in a around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + y \cdot z} \]
   10. Step-by-step derivation

       1. +-commutative N/A

          \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot z + x} \]

       2. *-commutative N/A

          \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot y} + x \]

       3. lower-fma.f64 85.8

          \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, y, x\right)} \]

   11. Applied rewrites 85.8%

       \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, y, x\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 71.1%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;a \leq -5.8 \cdot 10^{-108} \lor \neg \left(a \leq 7.2 \cdot 10^{-27}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(a, t, x\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(z, y, x\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 9: 51.3% accurate, 4.3× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \mathsf{fma}\left(a, t, x\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b) :precision binary64 (fma a t x))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	return fma(a, t, x);
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	return fma(a, t, x)
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := N[(a * t + x), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 92.0%

   \[\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \]
2. Add Preprocessing

3. Taylor expanded in y around 0

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \left(a \cdot t + a \cdot \left(b \cdot z\right)\right)} \]
4. Step-by-step derivation

   1. distribute-lft-in N/A

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(t + b \cdot z\right)} \]

   2. +-commutative N/A

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(t + b \cdot z\right) + x} \]

   3. *-commutative N/A

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(t + b \cdot z\right) \cdot a} + x \]

   4. lower-fma.f64 N/A

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(t + b \cdot z, a, x\right)} \]

   5. +-commutative N/A

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{b \cdot z + t}, a, x\right) \]

   6. lower-fma.f64 75.0

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, z, t\right)}, a, x\right) \]

5. Applied rewrites 75.0%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(b, z, t\right), a, x\right)} \]

6. Taylor expanded in z around inf

   \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(b \cdot z, a, x\right) \]
7. Step-by-step derivation

8. Applied rewrites 46.7%

   \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z \cdot b, a, x\right) \]

9. Taylor expanded in z around 0

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + a \cdot t} \]
10. Step-by-step derivation

    1. +-commutative N/A

       \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot t + x} \]

    2. lower-fma.f64 55.3

       \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(a, t, x\right)} \]

11. Applied rewrites 55.3%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(a, t, x\right)} \]
12. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 10: 27.6% accurate, 5.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ a \cdot t \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b) :precision binary64 (* a t))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	return a * t;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    code = a * t
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	return a * t;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b):
	return a * t

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	return Float64(a * t)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = a * t;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := N[(a * t), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 92.0%

   \[\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \]
2. Add Preprocessing

3. Taylor expanded in t around inf

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot t} \]
4. Step-by-step derivation

   1. lower-*.f64 31.6

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot t} \]

5. Applied rewrites 31.6%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot t} \]
6. Add Preprocessing

Developer Target 1: 97.5% accurate, 0.8× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_1 := z \cdot \left(b \cdot a + y\right) + \left(x + t \cdot a\right)\\ \mathbf{if}\;z < -11820553527347888000:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_1\\ \mathbf{elif}\;z < 4.7589743188364287 \cdot 10^{-122}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(b \cdot z + t\right) \cdot a + \left(z \cdot y + x\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_1\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_1 (+ (* z (+ (* b a) y)) (+ x (* t a)))))
   (if (< z -11820553527347888000.0)
     t_1
     (if (< z 4.7589743188364287e-122)
       (+ (* (+ (* b z) t) a) (+ (* z y) x))
       t_1))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double t_1 = (z * ((b * a) + y)) + (x + (t * a));
	double tmp;
	if (z < -11820553527347888000.0) {
		tmp = t_1;
	} else if (z < 4.7589743188364287e-122) {
		tmp = (((b * z) + t) * a) + ((z * y) + x);
	} else {
		tmp = t_1;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8) :: t_1
    real(8) :: tmp
    t_1 = (z * ((b * a) + y)) + (x + (t * a))
    if (z < (-11820553527347888000.0d0)) then
        tmp = t_1
    else if (z < 4.7589743188364287d-122) then
        tmp = (((b * z) + t) * a) + ((z * y) + x)
    else
        tmp = t_1
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double t_1 = (z * ((b * a) + y)) + (x + (t * a));
	double tmp;
	if (z < -11820553527347888000.0) {
		tmp = t_1;
	} else if (z < 4.7589743188364287e-122) {
		tmp = (((b * z) + t) * a) + ((z * y) + x);
	} else {
		tmp = t_1;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b):
	t_1 = (z * ((b * a) + y)) + (x + (t * a))
	tmp = 0
	if z < -11820553527347888000.0:
		tmp = t_1
	elif z < 4.7589743188364287e-122:
		tmp = (((b * z) + t) * a) + ((z * y) + x)
	else:
		tmp = t_1
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	t_1 = Float64(Float64(z * Float64(Float64(b * a) + y)) + Float64(x + Float64(t * a)))
	tmp = 0.0
	if (z < -11820553527347888000.0)
		tmp = t_1;
	elseif (z < 4.7589743188364287e-122)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(b * z) + t) * a) + Float64(Float64(z * y) + x));
	else
		tmp = t_1;
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	t_1 = (z * ((b * a) + y)) + (x + (t * a));
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (z < -11820553527347888000.0)
		tmp = t_1;
	elseif (z < 4.7589743188364287e-122)
		tmp = (((b * z) + t) * a) + ((z * y) + x);
	else
		tmp = t_1;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := Block[{t$95$1 = N[(N[(z * N[(N[(b * a), $MachinePrecision] + y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(x + N[(t * a), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, If[Less[z, -11820553527347888000.0], t$95$1, If[Less[z, 4.7589743188364287e-122], N[(N[(N[(N[(b * z), $MachinePrecision] + t), $MachinePrecision] * a), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(z * y), $MachinePrecision] + x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], t$95$1]]]

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2024340 
(FPCore (x y z t a b)
  :name "Graphics.Rasterific.CubicBezier:cachedBezierAt from Rasterific-0.6.1"
  :precision binary64

  :alt
  (! :herbie-platform default (if (< z -11820553527347888000) (+ (* z (+ (* b a) y)) (+ x (* t a))) (if (< z 47589743188364287/1000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000) (+ (* (+ (* b z) t) a) (+ (* z y) x)) (+ (* z (+ (* b a) y)) (+ x (* t a))))))

  (+ (+ (+ x (* y z)) (* t a)) (* (* a z) b)))