Quotient of sum of exps

Percentage Accurate: 99.1% → 99.1%

Time: 5.8s

Alternatives: 10

Speedup: 1.0×

• could not determine a ground truth

  1. a = 7.148605927556317e+20
  2. b = 3.3491091101311437e+289

Specification

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \frac{e^{a}}{e^{a} + e^{b}} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (a b) :precision binary64 (/ (exp a) (+ (exp a) (exp b))))

C

double code(double a, double b) {
	return exp(a) / (exp(a) + exp(b));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(a, b)
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    code = exp(a) / (exp(a) + exp(b))
end function

Java

public static double code(double a, double b) {
	return Math.exp(a) / (Math.exp(a) + Math.exp(b));
}

Python

def code(a, b):
	return math.exp(a) / (math.exp(a) + math.exp(b))

Julia

function code(a, b)
	return Float64(exp(a) / Float64(exp(a) + exp(b)))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(a, b)
	tmp = exp(a) / (exp(a) + exp(b));
end

Wolfram

code[a_, b_] := N[(N[Exp[a], $MachinePrecision] / N[(N[Exp[a], $MachinePrecision] + N[Exp[b], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Initial Program: 99.1% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \frac{e^{a}}{e^{a} + e^{b}} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (a b) :precision binary64 (/ (exp a) (+ (exp a) (exp b))))

C

double code(double a, double b) {
	return exp(a) / (exp(a) + exp(b));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(a, b)
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    code = exp(a) / (exp(a) + exp(b))
end function

Java

public static double code(double a, double b) {
	return Math.exp(a) / (Math.exp(a) + Math.exp(b));
}

Python

def code(a, b):
	return math.exp(a) / (math.exp(a) + math.exp(b))

Julia

function code(a, b)
	return Float64(exp(a) / Float64(exp(a) + exp(b)))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(a, b)
	tmp = exp(a) / (exp(a) + exp(b));
end

Wolfram

code[a_, b_] := N[(N[Exp[a], $MachinePrecision] / N[(N[Exp[a], $MachinePrecision] + N[Exp[b], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Alternative 1: 99.1% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \frac{e^{a}}{e^{a} + e^{b}} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (a b) :precision binary64 (/ (exp a) (+ (exp a) (exp b))))

C

double code(double a, double b) {
	return exp(a) / (exp(a) + exp(b));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(a, b)
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    code = exp(a) / (exp(a) + exp(b))
end function

Java

public static double code(double a, double b) {
	return Math.exp(a) / (Math.exp(a) + Math.exp(b));
}

Python

def code(a, b):
	return math.exp(a) / (math.exp(a) + math.exp(b))

Julia

function code(a, b)
	return Float64(exp(a) / Float64(exp(a) + exp(b)))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(a, b)
	tmp = exp(a) / (exp(a) + exp(b));
end

Wolfram

code[a_, b_] := N[(N[Exp[a], $MachinePrecision] / N[(N[Exp[a], $MachinePrecision] + N[Exp[b], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 98.8%

   \[\frac{e^{a}}{e^{a} + e^{b}} \]
2. Add Preprocessing
3. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 2: 98.4% accurate, 1.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;a \leq -520000:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{e^{a}}{2}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;{\left(e^{b} + 1\right)}^{-1}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (a b)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= a -520000.0) (/ (exp a) 2.0) (pow (+ (exp b) 1.0) -1.0)))

C

double code(double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if (a <= -520000.0) {
		tmp = exp(a) / 2.0;
	} else {
		tmp = pow((exp(b) + 1.0), -1.0);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(a, b)
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (a <= (-520000.0d0)) then
        tmp = exp(a) / 2.0d0
    else
        tmp = (exp(b) + 1.0d0) ** (-1.0d0)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if (a <= -520000.0) {
		tmp = Math.exp(a) / 2.0;
	} else {
		tmp = Math.pow((Math.exp(b) + 1.0), -1.0);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(a, b):
	tmp = 0
	if a <= -520000.0:
		tmp = math.exp(a) / 2.0
	else:
		tmp = math.pow((math.exp(b) + 1.0), -1.0)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(a, b)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (a <= -520000.0)
		tmp = Float64(exp(a) / 2.0);
	else
		tmp = Float64(exp(b) + 1.0) ^ -1.0;
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(a, b)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (a <= -520000.0)
		tmp = exp(a) / 2.0;
	else
		tmp = (exp(b) + 1.0) ^ -1.0;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[a_, b_] := If[LessEqual[a, -520000.0], N[(N[Exp[a], $MachinePrecision] / 2.0), $MachinePrecision], N[Power[N[(N[Exp[b], $MachinePrecision] + 1.0), $MachinePrecision], -1.0], $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if a < -5.2e5

   1. Initial program 98.4%

      \[\frac{e^{a}}{e^{a} + e^{b}} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in b around 0

      \[\leadsto \frac{e^{a}}{\color{blue}{1 + e^{a}}} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \frac{e^{a}}{\color{blue}{e^{a} + 1}} \]

      2. lower-+.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \frac{e^{a}}{\color{blue}{e^{a} + 1}} \]

      3. lower-exp.f64 100.0

         \[\leadsto \frac{e^{a}}{\color{blue}{e^{a}} + 1} \]

   5. Applied rewrites 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \frac{e^{a}}{\color{blue}{e^{a} + 1}} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in a around 0

      \[\leadsto \frac{e^{a}}{2} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

   8. Applied rewrites 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \frac{e^{a}}{2} \]

   if -5.2e5 < a

   1. Initial program 99.0%

      \[\frac{e^{a}}{e^{a} + e^{b}} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in a around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1}{1 + e^{b}}} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. lower-/.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1}{1 + e^{b}}} \]

      2. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \frac{1}{\color{blue}{e^{b} + 1}} \]

      3. lower-+.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \frac{1}{\color{blue}{e^{b} + 1}} \]

      4. lower-exp.f64 98.4

         \[\leadsto \frac{1}{\color{blue}{e^{b}} + 1} \]

   5. Applied rewrites 98.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1}{e^{b} + 1}} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 98.8%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;a \leq -520000:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{e^{a}}{2}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;{\left(e^{b} + 1\right)}^{-1}\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 3: 77.3% accurate, 2.4× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;b \leq 120000:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{e^{a}}{2}\\ \mathbf{elif}\;b \leq 1.05 \cdot 10^{+103}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{\left(a \cdot a\right) \cdot 0.5}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(0.5, a, 1\right), a, 2\right)}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;{\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(0.16666666666666666, b, 0.5\right), b, 1\right), b, 2\right)\right)}^{-1}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (a b)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= b 120000.0)
   (/ (exp a) 2.0)
   (if (<= b 1.05e+103)
     (/ (* (* a a) 0.5) (fma (fma 0.5 a 1.0) a 2.0))
     (pow (fma (fma (fma 0.16666666666666666 b 0.5) b 1.0) b 2.0) -1.0))))

C

double code(double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if (b <= 120000.0) {
		tmp = exp(a) / 2.0;
	} else if (b <= 1.05e+103) {
		tmp = ((a * a) * 0.5) / fma(fma(0.5, a, 1.0), a, 2.0);
	} else {
		tmp = pow(fma(fma(fma(0.16666666666666666, b, 0.5), b, 1.0), b, 2.0), -1.0);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Julia

function code(a, b)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (b <= 120000.0)
		tmp = Float64(exp(a) / 2.0);
	elseif (b <= 1.05e+103)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(Float64(a * a) * 0.5) / fma(fma(0.5, a, 1.0), a, 2.0));
	else
		tmp = fma(fma(fma(0.16666666666666666, b, 0.5), b, 1.0), b, 2.0) ^ -1.0;
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

code[a_, b_] := If[LessEqual[b, 120000.0], N[(N[Exp[a], $MachinePrecision] / 2.0), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[b, 1.05e+103], N[(N[(N[(a * a), $MachinePrecision] * 0.5), $MachinePrecision] / N[(N[(0.5 * a + 1.0), $MachinePrecision] * a + 2.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[Power[N[(N[(N[(0.16666666666666666 * b + 0.5), $MachinePrecision] * b + 1.0), $MachinePrecision] * b + 2.0), $MachinePrecision], -1.0], $MachinePrecision]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if b < 1.2e5

   1. Initial program 98.3%

      \[\frac{e^{a}}{e^{a} + e^{b}} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in b around 0

      \[\leadsto \frac{e^{a}}{\color{blue}{1 + e^{a}}} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \frac{e^{a}}{\color{blue}{e^{a} + 1}} \]

      2. lower-+.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \frac{e^{a}}{\color{blue}{e^{a} + 1}} \]

      3. lower-exp.f64 77.9

         \[\leadsto \frac{e^{a}}{\color{blue}{e^{a}} + 1} \]

   5. Applied rewrites 77.9%

      \[\leadsto \frac{e^{a}}{\color{blue}{e^{a} + 1}} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in a around 0

      \[\leadsto \frac{e^{a}}{2} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

   8. Applied rewrites 77.1%

      \[\leadsto \frac{e^{a}}{2} \]

   if 1.2e5 < b < 1.0500000000000001e103

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\frac{e^{a}}{e^{a} + e^{b}} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in b around 0

      \[\leadsto \frac{e^{a}}{\color{blue}{1 + e^{a}}} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \frac{e^{a}}{\color{blue}{e^{a} + 1}} \]

      2. lower-+.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \frac{e^{a}}{\color{blue}{e^{a} + 1}} \]

      3. lower-exp.f64 22.5

         \[\leadsto \frac{e^{a}}{\color{blue}{e^{a}} + 1} \]

   5. Applied rewrites 22.5%

      \[\leadsto \frac{e^{a}}{\color{blue}{e^{a} + 1}} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in a around 0

      \[\leadsto \frac{e^{a}}{2 + \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(1 + \frac{1}{2} \cdot a\right)}} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

   8. Applied rewrites 22.5%

      \[\leadsto \frac{e^{a}}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(0.5, a, 1\right), \color{blue}{a}, 2\right)} \]

   9. Taylor expanded in a around 0

      \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{1 + a \cdot \left(1 + \frac{1}{2} \cdot a\right)}}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(\frac{1}{2}, a, 1\right), a, 2\right)} \]
   10. Step-by-step derivation

       1. +-commutative N/A

          \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{a \cdot \left(1 + \frac{1}{2} \cdot a\right) + 1}}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(\frac{1}{2}, a, 1\right), a, 2\right)} \]

       2. *-commutative N/A

          \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{\left(1 + \frac{1}{2} \cdot a\right) \cdot a} + 1}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(\frac{1}{2}, a, 1\right), a, 2\right)} \]

       3. lower-fma.f64 N/A

          \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(1 + \frac{1}{2} \cdot a, a, 1\right)}}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(\frac{1}{2}, a, 1\right), a, 2\right)} \]

       4. +-commutative N/A

          \[\leadsto \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{\frac{1}{2} \cdot a + 1}, a, 1\right)}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(\frac{1}{2}, a, 1\right), a, 2\right)} \]

       5. lower-fma.f64 2.8

          \[\leadsto \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(0.5, a, 1\right)}, a, 1\right)}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(0.5, a, 1\right), a, 2\right)} \]

   11. Applied rewrites 2.8%

       \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(0.5, a, 1\right), a, 1\right)}}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(0.5, a, 1\right), a, 2\right)} \]

   12. Taylor expanded in a around inf

       \[\leadsto \frac{\frac{1}{2} \cdot \color{blue}{{a}^{2}}}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(\frac{1}{2}, a, 1\right), a, 2\right)} \]
   13. Step-by-step derivation

   14. Applied rewrites 53.9%

       \[\leadsto \frac{\left(a \cdot a\right) \cdot \color{blue}{0.5}}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(0.5, a, 1\right), a, 2\right)} \]

   if 1.0500000000000001e103 < b

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\frac{e^{a}}{e^{a} + e^{b}} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in a around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1}{1 + e^{b}}} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. lower-/.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1}{1 + e^{b}}} \]

      2. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \frac{1}{\color{blue}{e^{b} + 1}} \]

      3. lower-+.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \frac{1}{\color{blue}{e^{b} + 1}} \]

      4. lower-exp.f64 100.0

         \[\leadsto \frac{1}{\color{blue}{e^{b}} + 1} \]

   5. Applied rewrites 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1}{e^{b} + 1}} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in b around 0

      \[\leadsto \frac{1}{2 + \color{blue}{b \cdot \left(1 + b \cdot \left(\frac{1}{2} + \frac{1}{6} \cdot b\right)\right)}} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

   8. Applied rewrites 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \frac{1}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(0.16666666666666666, b, 0.5\right), b, 1\right), \color{blue}{b}, 2\right)} \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 78.4%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;b \leq 120000:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{e^{a}}{2}\\ \mathbf{elif}\;b \leq 1.05 \cdot 10^{+103}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{\left(a \cdot a\right) \cdot 0.5}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(0.5, a, 1\right), a, 2\right)}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;{\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(0.16666666666666666, b, 0.5\right), b, 1\right), b, 2\right)\right)}^{-1}\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 4: 71.9% accurate, 2.4× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;b \leq 105000:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{1}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(0.16666666666666666, a, 0.5\right), a, 1\right), a, 2\right)}\\ \mathbf{elif}\;b \leq 1.05 \cdot 10^{+103}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{\left(a \cdot a\right) \cdot 0.5}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(0.5, a, 1\right), a, 2\right)}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;{\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(0.16666666666666666, b, 0.5\right), b, 1\right), b, 2\right)\right)}^{-1}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (a b)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= b 105000.0)
   (/ 1.0 (fma (fma (fma 0.16666666666666666 a 0.5) a 1.0) a 2.0))
   (if (<= b 1.05e+103)
     (/ (* (* a a) 0.5) (fma (fma 0.5 a 1.0) a 2.0))
     (pow (fma (fma (fma 0.16666666666666666 b 0.5) b 1.0) b 2.0) -1.0))))

C

double code(double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if (b <= 105000.0) {
		tmp = 1.0 / fma(fma(fma(0.16666666666666666, a, 0.5), a, 1.0), a, 2.0);
	} else if (b <= 1.05e+103) {
		tmp = ((a * a) * 0.5) / fma(fma(0.5, a, 1.0), a, 2.0);
	} else {
		tmp = pow(fma(fma(fma(0.16666666666666666, b, 0.5), b, 1.0), b, 2.0), -1.0);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Julia

function code(a, b)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (b <= 105000.0)
		tmp = Float64(1.0 / fma(fma(fma(0.16666666666666666, a, 0.5), a, 1.0), a, 2.0));
	elseif (b <= 1.05e+103)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(Float64(a * a) * 0.5) / fma(fma(0.5, a, 1.0), a, 2.0));
	else
		tmp = fma(fma(fma(0.16666666666666666, b, 0.5), b, 1.0), b, 2.0) ^ -1.0;
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

code[a_, b_] := If[LessEqual[b, 105000.0], N[(1.0 / N[(N[(N[(0.16666666666666666 * a + 0.5), $MachinePrecision] * a + 1.0), $MachinePrecision] * a + 2.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[b, 1.05e+103], N[(N[(N[(a * a), $MachinePrecision] * 0.5), $MachinePrecision] / N[(N[(0.5 * a + 1.0), $MachinePrecision] * a + 2.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[Power[N[(N[(N[(0.16666666666666666 * b + 0.5), $MachinePrecision] * b + 1.0), $MachinePrecision] * b + 2.0), $MachinePrecision], -1.0], $MachinePrecision]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if b < 105000

   1. Initial program 98.3%

      \[\frac{e^{a}}{e^{a} + e^{b}} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in b around 0

      \[\leadsto \frac{e^{a}}{\color{blue}{1 + e^{a}}} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \frac{e^{a}}{\color{blue}{e^{a} + 1}} \]

      2. lower-+.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \frac{e^{a}}{\color{blue}{e^{a} + 1}} \]

      3. lower-exp.f64 77.9

         \[\leadsto \frac{e^{a}}{\color{blue}{e^{a}} + 1} \]

   5. Applied rewrites 77.9%

      \[\leadsto \frac{e^{a}}{\color{blue}{e^{a} + 1}} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in a around 0

      \[\leadsto \frac{e^{a}}{2 + \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(1 + a \cdot \left(\frac{1}{2} + \frac{1}{6} \cdot a\right)\right)}} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

   8. Applied rewrites 77.9%

      \[\leadsto \frac{e^{a}}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(0.16666666666666666, a, 0.5\right), a, 1\right), \color{blue}{a}, 2\right)} \]

   9. Taylor expanded in a around 0

      \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{1}}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(\frac{1}{6}, a, \frac{1}{2}\right), a, 1\right), a, 2\right)} \]
   10. Step-by-step derivation

   11. Applied rewrites 71.0%

       \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{1}}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(0.16666666666666666, a, 0.5\right), a, 1\right), a, 2\right)} \]

   if 105000 < b < 1.0500000000000001e103

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\frac{e^{a}}{e^{a} + e^{b}} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in b around 0

      \[\leadsto \frac{e^{a}}{\color{blue}{1 + e^{a}}} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \frac{e^{a}}{\color{blue}{e^{a} + 1}} \]

      2. lower-+.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \frac{e^{a}}{\color{blue}{e^{a} + 1}} \]

      3. lower-exp.f64 22.5

         \[\leadsto \frac{e^{a}}{\color{blue}{e^{a}} + 1} \]

   5. Applied rewrites 22.5%

      \[\leadsto \frac{e^{a}}{\color{blue}{e^{a} + 1}} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in a around 0

      \[\leadsto \frac{e^{a}}{2 + \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(1 + \frac{1}{2} \cdot a\right)}} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

   8. Applied rewrites 22.5%

      \[\leadsto \frac{e^{a}}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(0.5, a, 1\right), \color{blue}{a}, 2\right)} \]

   9. Taylor expanded in a around 0

      \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{1 + a \cdot \left(1 + \frac{1}{2} \cdot a\right)}}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(\frac{1}{2}, a, 1\right), a, 2\right)} \]
   10. Step-by-step derivation

       1. +-commutative N/A

          \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{a \cdot \left(1 + \frac{1}{2} \cdot a\right) + 1}}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(\frac{1}{2}, a, 1\right), a, 2\right)} \]

       2. *-commutative N/A

          \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{\left(1 + \frac{1}{2} \cdot a\right) \cdot a} + 1}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(\frac{1}{2}, a, 1\right), a, 2\right)} \]

       3. lower-fma.f64 N/A

          \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(1 + \frac{1}{2} \cdot a, a, 1\right)}}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(\frac{1}{2}, a, 1\right), a, 2\right)} \]

       4. +-commutative N/A

          \[\leadsto \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{\frac{1}{2} \cdot a + 1}, a, 1\right)}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(\frac{1}{2}, a, 1\right), a, 2\right)} \]

       5. lower-fma.f64 2.8

          \[\leadsto \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(0.5, a, 1\right)}, a, 1\right)}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(0.5, a, 1\right), a, 2\right)} \]

   11. Applied rewrites 2.8%

       \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(0.5, a, 1\right), a, 1\right)}}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(0.5, a, 1\right), a, 2\right)} \]

   12. Taylor expanded in a around inf

       \[\leadsto \frac{\frac{1}{2} \cdot \color{blue}{{a}^{2}}}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(\frac{1}{2}, a, 1\right), a, 2\right)} \]
   13. Step-by-step derivation

   14. Applied rewrites 53.9%

       \[\leadsto \frac{\left(a \cdot a\right) \cdot \color{blue}{0.5}}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(0.5, a, 1\right), a, 2\right)} \]

   if 1.0500000000000001e103 < b

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\frac{e^{a}}{e^{a} + e^{b}} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in a around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1}{1 + e^{b}}} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. lower-/.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1}{1 + e^{b}}} \]

      2. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \frac{1}{\color{blue}{e^{b} + 1}} \]

      3. lower-+.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \frac{1}{\color{blue}{e^{b} + 1}} \]

      4. lower-exp.f64 100.0

         \[\leadsto \frac{1}{\color{blue}{e^{b}} + 1} \]

   5. Applied rewrites 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1}{e^{b} + 1}} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in b around 0

      \[\leadsto \frac{1}{2 + \color{blue}{b \cdot \left(1 + b \cdot \left(\frac{1}{2} + \frac{1}{6} \cdot b\right)\right)}} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

   8. Applied rewrites 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \frac{1}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(0.16666666666666666, b, 0.5\right), b, 1\right), \color{blue}{b}, 2\right)} \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 74.1%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;b \leq 105000:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{1}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(0.16666666666666666, a, 0.5\right), a, 1\right), a, 2\right)}\\ \mathbf{elif}\;b \leq 1.05 \cdot 10^{+103}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{\left(a \cdot a\right) \cdot 0.5}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(0.5, a, 1\right), a, 2\right)}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;{\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(0.16666666666666666, b, 0.5\right), b, 1\right), b, 2\right)\right)}^{-1}\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 5: 70.8% accurate, 2.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;b \leq 4.8 \cdot 10^{+82}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{1}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(0.16666666666666666, a, 0.5\right), a, 1\right), a, 2\right)}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;{\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(0.16666666666666666, b, 0.5\right), b, 1\right), b, 2\right)\right)}^{-1}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (a b)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= b 4.8e+82)
   (/ 1.0 (fma (fma (fma 0.16666666666666666 a 0.5) a 1.0) a 2.0))
   (pow (fma (fma (fma 0.16666666666666666 b 0.5) b 1.0) b 2.0) -1.0)))

C

double code(double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if (b <= 4.8e+82) {
		tmp = 1.0 / fma(fma(fma(0.16666666666666666, a, 0.5), a, 1.0), a, 2.0);
	} else {
		tmp = pow(fma(fma(fma(0.16666666666666666, b, 0.5), b, 1.0), b, 2.0), -1.0);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Julia

function code(a, b)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (b <= 4.8e+82)
		tmp = Float64(1.0 / fma(fma(fma(0.16666666666666666, a, 0.5), a, 1.0), a, 2.0));
	else
		tmp = fma(fma(fma(0.16666666666666666, b, 0.5), b, 1.0), b, 2.0) ^ -1.0;
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

code[a_, b_] := If[LessEqual[b, 4.8e+82], N[(1.0 / N[(N[(N[(0.16666666666666666 * a + 0.5), $MachinePrecision] * a + 1.0), $MachinePrecision] * a + 2.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[Power[N[(N[(N[(0.16666666666666666 * b + 0.5), $MachinePrecision] * b + 1.0), $MachinePrecision] * b + 2.0), $MachinePrecision], -1.0], $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if b < 4.79999999999999996e82

   1. Initial program 98.5%

      \[\frac{e^{a}}{e^{a} + e^{b}} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in b around 0

      \[\leadsto \frac{e^{a}}{\color{blue}{1 + e^{a}}} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \frac{e^{a}}{\color{blue}{e^{a} + 1}} \]

      2. lower-+.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \frac{e^{a}}{\color{blue}{e^{a} + 1}} \]

      3. lower-exp.f64 71.4

         \[\leadsto \frac{e^{a}}{\color{blue}{e^{a}} + 1} \]

   5. Applied rewrites 71.4%

      \[\leadsto \frac{e^{a}}{\color{blue}{e^{a} + 1}} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in a around 0

      \[\leadsto \frac{e^{a}}{2 + \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(1 + a \cdot \left(\frac{1}{2} + \frac{1}{6} \cdot a\right)\right)}} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

   8. Applied rewrites 71.4%

      \[\leadsto \frac{e^{a}}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(0.16666666666666666, a, 0.5\right), a, 1\right), \color{blue}{a}, 2\right)} \]

   9. Taylor expanded in a around 0

      \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{1}}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(\frac{1}{6}, a, \frac{1}{2}\right), a, 1\right), a, 2\right)} \]
   10. Step-by-step derivation

   11. Applied rewrites 64.8%

       \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{1}}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(0.16666666666666666, a, 0.5\right), a, 1\right), a, 2\right)} \]

   if 4.79999999999999996e82 < b

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\frac{e^{a}}{e^{a} + e^{b}} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in a around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1}{1 + e^{b}}} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. lower-/.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1}{1 + e^{b}}} \]

      2. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \frac{1}{\color{blue}{e^{b} + 1}} \]

      3. lower-+.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \frac{1}{\color{blue}{e^{b} + 1}} \]

      4. lower-exp.f64 100.0

         \[\leadsto \frac{1}{\color{blue}{e^{b}} + 1} \]

   5. Applied rewrites 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1}{e^{b} + 1}} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in b around 0

      \[\leadsto \frac{1}{2 + \color{blue}{b \cdot \left(1 + b \cdot \left(\frac{1}{2} + \frac{1}{6} \cdot b\right)\right)}} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

   8. Applied rewrites 87.6%

      \[\leadsto \frac{1}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(0.16666666666666666, b, 0.5\right), b, 1\right), \color{blue}{b}, 2\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 69.4%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;b \leq 4.8 \cdot 10^{+82}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{1}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(0.16666666666666666, a, 0.5\right), a, 1\right), a, 2\right)}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;{\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(0.16666666666666666, b, 0.5\right), b, 1\right), b, 2\right)\right)}^{-1}\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 6: 67.9% accurate, 2.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;b \leq 3.3 \cdot 10^{+82}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{1 + a}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(0.5, a, 1\right), a, 2\right)}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;{\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(0.16666666666666666, b, 0.5\right), b, 1\right), b, 2\right)\right)}^{-1}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (a b)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= b 3.3e+82)
   (/ (+ 1.0 a) (fma (fma 0.5 a 1.0) a 2.0))
   (pow (fma (fma (fma 0.16666666666666666 b 0.5) b 1.0) b 2.0) -1.0)))

C

double code(double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if (b <= 3.3e+82) {
		tmp = (1.0 + a) / fma(fma(0.5, a, 1.0), a, 2.0);
	} else {
		tmp = pow(fma(fma(fma(0.16666666666666666, b, 0.5), b, 1.0), b, 2.0), -1.0);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Julia

function code(a, b)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (b <= 3.3e+82)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(1.0 + a) / fma(fma(0.5, a, 1.0), a, 2.0));
	else
		tmp = fma(fma(fma(0.16666666666666666, b, 0.5), b, 1.0), b, 2.0) ^ -1.0;
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

code[a_, b_] := If[LessEqual[b, 3.3e+82], N[(N[(1.0 + a), $MachinePrecision] / N[(N[(0.5 * a + 1.0), $MachinePrecision] * a + 2.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[Power[N[(N[(N[(0.16666666666666666 * b + 0.5), $MachinePrecision] * b + 1.0), $MachinePrecision] * b + 2.0), $MachinePrecision], -1.0], $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if b < 3.2999999999999998e82

   1. Initial program 98.5%

      \[\frac{e^{a}}{e^{a} + e^{b}} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in b around 0

      \[\leadsto \frac{e^{a}}{\color{blue}{1 + e^{a}}} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \frac{e^{a}}{\color{blue}{e^{a} + 1}} \]

      2. lower-+.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \frac{e^{a}}{\color{blue}{e^{a} + 1}} \]

      3. lower-exp.f64 71.4

         \[\leadsto \frac{e^{a}}{\color{blue}{e^{a}} + 1} \]

   5. Applied rewrites 71.4%

      \[\leadsto \frac{e^{a}}{\color{blue}{e^{a} + 1}} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in a around 0

      \[\leadsto \frac{e^{a}}{2 + \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(1 + \frac{1}{2} \cdot a\right)}} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

   8. Applied rewrites 71.4%

      \[\leadsto \frac{e^{a}}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(0.5, a, 1\right), \color{blue}{a}, 2\right)} \]

   9. Taylor expanded in a around 0

      \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{1 + a}}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(\frac{1}{2}, a, 1\right), a, 2\right)} \]
   10. Step-by-step derivation

       1. lower-+.f64 61.8

          \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{1 + a}}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(0.5, a, 1\right), a, 2\right)} \]

   11. Applied rewrites 61.8%

       \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{1 + a}}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(0.5, a, 1\right), a, 2\right)} \]

   if 3.2999999999999998e82 < b

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\frac{e^{a}}{e^{a} + e^{b}} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in a around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1}{1 + e^{b}}} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. lower-/.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1}{1 + e^{b}}} \]

      2. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \frac{1}{\color{blue}{e^{b} + 1}} \]

      3. lower-+.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \frac{1}{\color{blue}{e^{b} + 1}} \]

      4. lower-exp.f64 100.0

         \[\leadsto \frac{1}{\color{blue}{e^{b}} + 1} \]

   5. Applied rewrites 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1}{e^{b} + 1}} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in b around 0

      \[\leadsto \frac{1}{2 + \color{blue}{b \cdot \left(1 + b \cdot \left(\frac{1}{2} + \frac{1}{6} \cdot b\right)\right)}} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

   8. Applied rewrites 87.6%

      \[\leadsto \frac{1}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(0.16666666666666666, b, 0.5\right), b, 1\right), \color{blue}{b}, 2\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 67.1%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;b \leq 3.3 \cdot 10^{+82}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{1 + a}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(0.5, a, 1\right), a, 2\right)}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;{\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(0.16666666666666666, b, 0.5\right), b, 1\right), b, 2\right)\right)}^{-1}\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 7: 63.5% accurate, 2.6× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;b \leq 3.3 \cdot 10^{+82}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{1 + a}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(0.5, a, 1\right), a, 2\right)}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;{\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(0.5, b, 1\right), b, 2\right)\right)}^{-1}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (a b)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= b 3.3e+82)
   (/ (+ 1.0 a) (fma (fma 0.5 a 1.0) a 2.0))
   (pow (fma (fma 0.5 b 1.0) b 2.0) -1.0)))

C

double code(double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if (b <= 3.3e+82) {
		tmp = (1.0 + a) / fma(fma(0.5, a, 1.0), a, 2.0);
	} else {
		tmp = pow(fma(fma(0.5, b, 1.0), b, 2.0), -1.0);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Julia

function code(a, b)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (b <= 3.3e+82)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(1.0 + a) / fma(fma(0.5, a, 1.0), a, 2.0));
	else
		tmp = fma(fma(0.5, b, 1.0), b, 2.0) ^ -1.0;
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

code[a_, b_] := If[LessEqual[b, 3.3e+82], N[(N[(1.0 + a), $MachinePrecision] / N[(N[(0.5 * a + 1.0), $MachinePrecision] * a + 2.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[Power[N[(N[(0.5 * b + 1.0), $MachinePrecision] * b + 2.0), $MachinePrecision], -1.0], $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if b < 3.2999999999999998e82

   1. Initial program 98.5%

      \[\frac{e^{a}}{e^{a} + e^{b}} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in b around 0

      \[\leadsto \frac{e^{a}}{\color{blue}{1 + e^{a}}} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \frac{e^{a}}{\color{blue}{e^{a} + 1}} \]

      2. lower-+.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \frac{e^{a}}{\color{blue}{e^{a} + 1}} \]

      3. lower-exp.f64 71.4

         \[\leadsto \frac{e^{a}}{\color{blue}{e^{a}} + 1} \]

   5. Applied rewrites 71.4%

      \[\leadsto \frac{e^{a}}{\color{blue}{e^{a} + 1}} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in a around 0

      \[\leadsto \frac{e^{a}}{2 + \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(1 + \frac{1}{2} \cdot a\right)}} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

   8. Applied rewrites 71.4%

      \[\leadsto \frac{e^{a}}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(0.5, a, 1\right), \color{blue}{a}, 2\right)} \]

   9. Taylor expanded in a around 0

      \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{1 + a}}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(\frac{1}{2}, a, 1\right), a, 2\right)} \]
   10. Step-by-step derivation

       1. lower-+.f64 61.8

          \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{1 + a}}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(0.5, a, 1\right), a, 2\right)} \]

   11. Applied rewrites 61.8%

       \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{1 + a}}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(0.5, a, 1\right), a, 2\right)} \]

   if 3.2999999999999998e82 < b

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\frac{e^{a}}{e^{a} + e^{b}} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in a around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1}{1 + e^{b}}} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. lower-/.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1}{1 + e^{b}}} \]

      2. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \frac{1}{\color{blue}{e^{b} + 1}} \]

      3. lower-+.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \frac{1}{\color{blue}{e^{b} + 1}} \]

      4. lower-exp.f64 100.0

         \[\leadsto \frac{1}{\color{blue}{e^{b}} + 1} \]

   5. Applied rewrites 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1}{e^{b} + 1}} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in b around 0

      \[\leadsto \frac{1}{2 + \color{blue}{b \cdot \left(1 + \frac{1}{2} \cdot b\right)}} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

   8. Applied rewrites 74.7%

      \[\leadsto \frac{1}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(0.5, b, 1\right), \color{blue}{b}, 2\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 64.4%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;b \leq 3.3 \cdot 10^{+82}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{1 + a}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(0.5, a, 1\right), a, 2\right)}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;{\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(0.5, b, 1\right), b, 2\right)\right)}^{-1}\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 8: 63.2% accurate, 2.6× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;b \leq 3.3 \cdot 10^{+82}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{1}{\mathsf{fma}\left(0.5 \cdot a, a, 2\right)}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;{\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(0.5, b, 1\right), b, 2\right)\right)}^{-1}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (a b)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= b 3.3e+82)
   (/ 1.0 (fma (* 0.5 a) a 2.0))
   (pow (fma (fma 0.5 b 1.0) b 2.0) -1.0)))

C

double code(double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if (b <= 3.3e+82) {
		tmp = 1.0 / fma((0.5 * a), a, 2.0);
	} else {
		tmp = pow(fma(fma(0.5, b, 1.0), b, 2.0), -1.0);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Julia

function code(a, b)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (b <= 3.3e+82)
		tmp = Float64(1.0 / fma(Float64(0.5 * a), a, 2.0));
	else
		tmp = fma(fma(0.5, b, 1.0), b, 2.0) ^ -1.0;
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

code[a_, b_] := If[LessEqual[b, 3.3e+82], N[(1.0 / N[(N[(0.5 * a), $MachinePrecision] * a + 2.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[Power[N[(N[(0.5 * b + 1.0), $MachinePrecision] * b + 2.0), $MachinePrecision], -1.0], $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if b < 3.2999999999999998e82

   1. Initial program 98.5%

      \[\frac{e^{a}}{e^{a} + e^{b}} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in b around 0

      \[\leadsto \frac{e^{a}}{\color{blue}{1 + e^{a}}} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \frac{e^{a}}{\color{blue}{e^{a} + 1}} \]

      2. lower-+.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \frac{e^{a}}{\color{blue}{e^{a} + 1}} \]

      3. lower-exp.f64 71.4

         \[\leadsto \frac{e^{a}}{\color{blue}{e^{a}} + 1} \]

   5. Applied rewrites 71.4%

      \[\leadsto \frac{e^{a}}{\color{blue}{e^{a} + 1}} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in a around 0

      \[\leadsto \frac{e^{a}}{2 + \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(1 + \frac{1}{2} \cdot a\right)}} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

   8. Applied rewrites 71.4%

      \[\leadsto \frac{e^{a}}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(0.5, a, 1\right), \color{blue}{a}, 2\right)} \]

   9. Taylor expanded in a around 0

      \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{1}}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(\frac{1}{2}, a, 1\right), a, 2\right)} \]
   10. Step-by-step derivation

   11. Applied rewrites 61.5%

       \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{1}}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(0.5, a, 1\right), a, 2\right)} \]

   12. Taylor expanded in a around inf

       \[\leadsto \frac{1}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\frac{1}{2} \cdot a, a, 2\right)} \]
   13. Step-by-step derivation

   14. Applied rewrites 61.6%

       \[\leadsto \frac{1}{\mathsf{fma}\left(0.5 \cdot a, a, 2\right)} \]

   if 3.2999999999999998e82 < b

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\frac{e^{a}}{e^{a} + e^{b}} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in a around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1}{1 + e^{b}}} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. lower-/.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1}{1 + e^{b}}} \]

      2. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \frac{1}{\color{blue}{e^{b} + 1}} \]

      3. lower-+.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \frac{1}{\color{blue}{e^{b} + 1}} \]

      4. lower-exp.f64 100.0

         \[\leadsto \frac{1}{\color{blue}{e^{b}} + 1} \]

   5. Applied rewrites 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1}{e^{b} + 1}} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in b around 0

      \[\leadsto \frac{1}{2 + \color{blue}{b \cdot \left(1 + \frac{1}{2} \cdot b\right)}} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

   8. Applied rewrites 74.7%

      \[\leadsto \frac{1}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(0.5, b, 1\right), \color{blue}{b}, 2\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 64.2%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;b \leq 3.3 \cdot 10^{+82}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{1}{\mathsf{fma}\left(0.5 \cdot a, a, 2\right)}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;{\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(0.5, b, 1\right), b, 2\right)\right)}^{-1}\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 9: 53.0% accurate, 13.7× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \frac{1}{\mathsf{fma}\left(0.5 \cdot a, a, 2\right)} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (a b) :precision binary64 (/ 1.0 (fma (* 0.5 a) a 2.0)))

C

double code(double a, double b) {
	return 1.0 / fma((0.5 * a), a, 2.0);
}

Julia

function code(a, b)
	return Float64(1.0 / fma(Float64(0.5 * a), a, 2.0))
end

Wolfram

code[a_, b_] := N[(1.0 / N[(N[(0.5 * a), $MachinePrecision] * a + 2.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 98.8%

   \[\frac{e^{a}}{e^{a} + e^{b}} \]
2. Add Preprocessing

3. Taylor expanded in b around 0

   \[\leadsto \frac{e^{a}}{\color{blue}{1 + e^{a}}} \]
4. Step-by-step derivation

   1. +-commutative N/A

      \[\leadsto \frac{e^{a}}{\color{blue}{e^{a} + 1}} \]

   2. lower-+.f64 N/A

      \[\leadsto \frac{e^{a}}{\color{blue}{e^{a} + 1}} \]

   3. lower-exp.f64 64.3

      \[\leadsto \frac{e^{a}}{\color{blue}{e^{a}} + 1} \]

5. Applied rewrites 64.3%

   \[\leadsto \frac{e^{a}}{\color{blue}{e^{a} + 1}} \]

6. Taylor expanded in a around 0

   \[\leadsto \frac{e^{a}}{2 + \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(1 + \frac{1}{2} \cdot a\right)}} \]
7. Step-by-step derivation

8. Applied rewrites 64.3%

   \[\leadsto \frac{e^{a}}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(0.5, a, 1\right), \color{blue}{a}, 2\right)} \]

9. Taylor expanded in a around 0

   \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{1}}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(\frac{1}{2}, a, 1\right), a, 2\right)} \]
10. Step-by-step derivation

11. Applied rewrites 52.8%

    \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{1}}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(0.5, a, 1\right), a, 2\right)} \]

12. Taylor expanded in a around inf

    \[\leadsto \frac{1}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\frac{1}{2} \cdot a, a, 2\right)} \]
13. Step-by-step derivation

14. Applied rewrites 52.8%

    \[\leadsto \frac{1}{\mathsf{fma}\left(0.5 \cdot a, a, 2\right)} \]
15. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 10: 39.4% accurate, 315.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ 0.5 \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (a b) :precision binary64 0.5)

C

double code(double a, double b) {
	return 0.5;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(a, b)
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    code = 0.5d0
end function

Java

public static double code(double a, double b) {
	return 0.5;
}

Python

def code(a, b):
	return 0.5

Julia

function code(a, b)
	return 0.5
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(a, b)
	tmp = 0.5;
end

Wolfram

code[a_, b_] := 0.5

Derivation

1. Initial program 98.8%

   \[\frac{e^{a}}{e^{a} + e^{b}} \]
2. Add Preprocessing

3. Taylor expanded in a around 0

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1}{1 + e^{b}}} \]
4. Step-by-step derivation

   1. lower-/.f64 N/A

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1}{1 + e^{b}}} \]

   2. +-commutative N/A

      \[\leadsto \frac{1}{\color{blue}{e^{b} + 1}} \]

   3. lower-+.f64 N/A

      \[\leadsto \frac{1}{\color{blue}{e^{b} + 1}} \]

   4. lower-exp.f64 82.9

      \[\leadsto \frac{1}{\color{blue}{e^{b}} + 1} \]

5. Applied rewrites 82.9%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1}{e^{b} + 1}} \]

6. Taylor expanded in b around 0

   \[\leadsto \frac{1}{2} \]
7. Step-by-step derivation

8. Applied rewrites 39.7%

   \[\leadsto 0.5 \]
9. Add Preprocessing

Developer Target 1: 100.0% accurate, 2.7× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \frac{1}{1 + e^{b - a}} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (a b) :precision binary64 (/ 1.0 (+ 1.0 (exp (- b a)))))

C

double code(double a, double b) {
	return 1.0 / (1.0 + exp((b - a)));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(a, b)
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    code = 1.0d0 / (1.0d0 + exp((b - a)))
end function

Java

public static double code(double a, double b) {
	return 1.0 / (1.0 + Math.exp((b - a)));
}

Python

def code(a, b):
	return 1.0 / (1.0 + math.exp((b - a)))

Julia

function code(a, b)
	return Float64(1.0 / Float64(1.0 + exp(Float64(b - a))))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(a, b)
	tmp = 1.0 / (1.0 + exp((b - a)));
end

Wolfram

code[a_, b_] := N[(1.0 / N[(1.0 + N[Exp[N[(b - a), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2024339 
(FPCore (a b)
  :name "Quotient of sum of exps"
  :precision binary64

  :alt
  (! :herbie-platform default (/ 1 (+ 1 (exp (- b a)))))

  (/ (exp a) (+ (exp a) (exp b))))