Linear.V4:$cdot from linear-1.19.1.3, C

Percentage Accurate: 95.7% → 97.7%

Time: 6.9s

Alternatives: 12

Speedup: 1.3×

• 41.1% of points produce a very large (infinite) output. You may want to add a precondition.

Specification

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
 :precision binary64
 (+ (+ (+ (* x y) (* z t)) (* a b)) (* c i)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	return (((x * y) + (z * t)) + (a * b)) + (c * i);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: c
    real(8), intent (in) :: i
    code = (((x * y) + (z * t)) + (a * b)) + (c * i)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	return (((x * y) + (z * t)) + (a * b)) + (c * i);
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i):
	return (((x * y) + (z * t)) + (a * b)) + (c * i)

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(x * y) + Float64(z * t)) + Float64(a * b)) + Float64(c * i))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = (((x * y) + (z * t)) + (a * b)) + (c * i);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := N[(N[(N[(N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(c * i), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Initial Program: 95.7% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
 :precision binary64
 (+ (+ (+ (* x y) (* z t)) (* a b)) (* c i)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	return (((x * y) + (z * t)) + (a * b)) + (c * i);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: c
    real(8), intent (in) :: i
    code = (((x * y) + (z * t)) + (a * b)) + (c * i)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	return (((x * y) + (z * t)) + (a * b)) + (c * i);
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i):
	return (((x * y) + (z * t)) + (a * b)) + (c * i)

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(x * y) + Float64(z * t)) + Float64(a * b)) + Float64(c * i))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = (((x * y) + (z * t)) + (a * b)) + (c * i);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := N[(N[(N[(N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(c * i), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Alternative 1: 97.7% accurate, 1.3× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, \mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \mathsf{fma}\left(t, z, y \cdot x\right)\right)\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
 :precision binary64
 (fma i c (fma b a (fma t z (* y x)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	return fma(i, c, fma(b, a, fma(t, z, (y * x))));
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	return fma(i, c, fma(b, a, fma(t, z, Float64(y * x))))
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := N[(i * c + N[(b * a + N[(t * z + N[(y * x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 95.3%

   \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
2. Add Preprocessing
3. Step-by-step derivation

   1. lift-+.f64 N/A

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i} \]

   2. +-commutative N/A

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c \cdot i + \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

   3. lift-*.f64 N/A

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c \cdot i} + \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) \]

   4. *-commutative N/A

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{i \cdot c} + \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) \]

   5. lower-fma.f64 96.5

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

   6. lift-+.f64 N/A

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b}\right) \]

   7. +-commutative N/A

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

   8. lift-*.f64 N/A

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, \color{blue}{a \cdot b} + \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)\right) \]

   9. *-commutative N/A

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, \color{blue}{b \cdot a} + \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)\right) \]

   10. lower-fma.f64 97.2

       \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

   11. lift-+.f64 N/A

       \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, \mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \color{blue}{x \cdot y + z \cdot t}\right)\right) \]

   12. +-commutative N/A

       \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, \mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \color{blue}{z \cdot t + x \cdot y}\right)\right) \]

   13. lift-*.f64 N/A

       \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, \mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \color{blue}{z \cdot t} + x \cdot y\right)\right) \]

   14. *-commutative N/A

       \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, \mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \color{blue}{t \cdot z} + x \cdot y\right)\right) \]

   15. lower-fma.f64 97.6

       \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, \mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(t, z, x \cdot y\right)}\right)\right) \]

   16. lift-*.f64 N/A

       \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, \mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \mathsf{fma}\left(t, z, \color{blue}{x \cdot y}\right)\right)\right) \]

   17. *-commutative N/A

       \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, \mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \mathsf{fma}\left(t, z, \color{blue}{y \cdot x}\right)\right)\right) \]

   18. lower-*.f64 97.6

       \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, \mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \mathsf{fma}\left(t, z, \color{blue}{y \cdot x}\right)\right)\right) \]

4. Applied rewrites 97.6%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, \mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \mathsf{fma}\left(t, z, y \cdot x\right)\right)\right)} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 2: 88.4% accurate, 0.7× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;a \cdot b \leq -5 \cdot 10^{+170} \lor \neg \left(a \cdot b \leq 5 \cdot 10^{+146}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \mathsf{fma}\left(y, x, c \cdot i\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, \mathsf{fma}\left(t, z, y \cdot x\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= (* a b) -5e+170) (not (<= (* a b) 5e+146)))
   (fma b a (fma y x (* c i)))
   (fma i c (fma t z (* y x)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double tmp;
	if (((a * b) <= -5e+170) || !((a * b) <= 5e+146)) {
		tmp = fma(b, a, fma(y, x, (c * i)));
	} else {
		tmp = fma(i, c, fma(t, z, (y * x)));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((Float64(a * b) <= -5e+170) || !(Float64(a * b) <= 5e+146))
		tmp = fma(b, a, fma(y, x, Float64(c * i)));
	else
		tmp = fma(i, c, fma(t, z, Float64(y * x)));
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := If[Or[LessEqual[N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision], -5e+170], N[Not[LessEqual[N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision], 5e+146]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(b * a + N[(y * x + N[(c * i), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(i * c + N[(t * z + N[(y * x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (*.f64 a b) < -4.99999999999999977e170 or 4.9999999999999999e146 < (*.f64 a b)

   1. Initial program 89.2%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in z around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(c \cdot i + x \cdot y\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{b \cdot a} + \left(c \cdot i + x \cdot y\right) \]

      2. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, c \cdot i + x \cdot y\right)} \]

      3. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \color{blue}{i \cdot c} + x \cdot y\right) \]

      4. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, x \cdot y\right)}\right) \]

      5. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, \color{blue}{y \cdot x}\right)\right) \]

      6. lower-*.f64 90.9

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, \color{blue}{y \cdot x}\right)\right) \]

   5. Applied rewrites 90.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, y \cdot x\right)\right)} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

   7. Applied rewrites 92.4%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \mathsf{fma}\left(y, x, c \cdot i\right)\right) \]

   if -4.99999999999999977e170 < (*.f64 a b) < 4.9999999999999999e146

   1. Initial program 97.3%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in a around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c \cdot i + \left(t \cdot z + x \cdot y\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{i \cdot c} + \left(t \cdot z + x \cdot y\right) \]

      2. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, t \cdot z + x \cdot y\right)} \]

      3. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(t, z, x \cdot y\right)}\right) \]

      4. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, \mathsf{fma}\left(t, z, \color{blue}{y \cdot x}\right)\right) \]

      5. lower-*.f64 93.8

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, \mathsf{fma}\left(t, z, \color{blue}{y \cdot x}\right)\right) \]

   5. Applied rewrites 93.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, \mathsf{fma}\left(t, z, y \cdot x\right)\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 93.5%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;a \cdot b \leq -5 \cdot 10^{+170} \lor \neg \left(a \cdot b \leq 5 \cdot 10^{+146}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \mathsf{fma}\left(y, x, c \cdot i\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, \mathsf{fma}\left(t, z, y \cdot x\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 3: 89.4% accurate, 0.7× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \cdot y \leq -2 \cdot 10^{+124} \lor \neg \left(x \cdot y \leq 10^{+37}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \mathsf{fma}\left(y, x, c \cdot i\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, t \cdot z\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= (* x y) -2e+124) (not (<= (* x y) 1e+37)))
   (fma b a (fma y x (* c i)))
   (fma b a (fma i c (* t z)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double tmp;
	if (((x * y) <= -2e+124) || !((x * y) <= 1e+37)) {
		tmp = fma(b, a, fma(y, x, (c * i)));
	} else {
		tmp = fma(b, a, fma(i, c, (t * z)));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((Float64(x * y) <= -2e+124) || !(Float64(x * y) <= 1e+37))
		tmp = fma(b, a, fma(y, x, Float64(c * i)));
	else
		tmp = fma(b, a, fma(i, c, Float64(t * z)));
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := If[Or[LessEqual[N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision], -2e+124], N[Not[LessEqual[N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision], 1e+37]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(b * a + N[(y * x + N[(c * i), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(b * a + N[(i * c + N[(t * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (*.f64 x y) < -1.9999999999999999e124 or 9.99999999999999954e36 < (*.f64 x y)

   1. Initial program 91.6%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in z around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(c \cdot i + x \cdot y\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{b \cdot a} + \left(c \cdot i + x \cdot y\right) \]

      2. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, c \cdot i + x \cdot y\right)} \]

      3. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \color{blue}{i \cdot c} + x \cdot y\right) \]

      4. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, x \cdot y\right)}\right) \]

      5. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, \color{blue}{y \cdot x}\right)\right) \]

      6. lower-*.f64 86.4

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, \color{blue}{y \cdot x}\right)\right) \]

   5. Applied rewrites 86.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, y \cdot x\right)\right)} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

   7. Applied rewrites 86.5%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \mathsf{fma}\left(y, x, c \cdot i\right)\right) \]

   if -1.9999999999999999e124 < (*.f64 x y) < 9.99999999999999954e36

   1. Initial program 98.0%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(c \cdot i + t \cdot z\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{b \cdot a} + \left(c \cdot i + t \cdot z\right) \]

      2. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, c \cdot i + t \cdot z\right)} \]

      3. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \color{blue}{i \cdot c} + t \cdot z\right) \]

      4. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, t \cdot z\right)}\right) \]

      5. lower-*.f64 94.2

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, \color{blue}{t \cdot z}\right)\right) \]

   5. Applied rewrites 94.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, t \cdot z\right)\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 91.0%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \cdot y \leq -2 \cdot 10^{+124} \lor \neg \left(x \cdot y \leq 10^{+37}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \mathsf{fma}\left(y, x, c \cdot i\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, t \cdot z\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 4: 89.4% accurate, 0.7× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \cdot y \leq -2 \cdot 10^{+124} \lor \neg \left(x \cdot y \leq 10^{+37}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, y \cdot x\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, t \cdot z\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= (* x y) -2e+124) (not (<= (* x y) 1e+37)))
   (fma b a (fma i c (* y x)))
   (fma b a (fma i c (* t z)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double tmp;
	if (((x * y) <= -2e+124) || !((x * y) <= 1e+37)) {
		tmp = fma(b, a, fma(i, c, (y * x)));
	} else {
		tmp = fma(b, a, fma(i, c, (t * z)));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((Float64(x * y) <= -2e+124) || !(Float64(x * y) <= 1e+37))
		tmp = fma(b, a, fma(i, c, Float64(y * x)));
	else
		tmp = fma(b, a, fma(i, c, Float64(t * z)));
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := If[Or[LessEqual[N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision], -2e+124], N[Not[LessEqual[N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision], 1e+37]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(b * a + N[(i * c + N[(y * x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(b * a + N[(i * c + N[(t * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (*.f64 x y) < -1.9999999999999999e124 or 9.99999999999999954e36 < (*.f64 x y)

   1. Initial program 91.6%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in z around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(c \cdot i + x \cdot y\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{b \cdot a} + \left(c \cdot i + x \cdot y\right) \]

      2. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, c \cdot i + x \cdot y\right)} \]

      3. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \color{blue}{i \cdot c} + x \cdot y\right) \]

      4. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, x \cdot y\right)}\right) \]

      5. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, \color{blue}{y \cdot x}\right)\right) \]

      6. lower-*.f64 86.4

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, \color{blue}{y \cdot x}\right)\right) \]

   5. Applied rewrites 86.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, y \cdot x\right)\right)} \]

   if -1.9999999999999999e124 < (*.f64 x y) < 9.99999999999999954e36

   1. Initial program 98.0%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(c \cdot i + t \cdot z\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{b \cdot a} + \left(c \cdot i + t \cdot z\right) \]

      2. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, c \cdot i + t \cdot z\right)} \]

      3. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \color{blue}{i \cdot c} + t \cdot z\right) \]

      4. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, t \cdot z\right)}\right) \]

      5. lower-*.f64 94.2

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, \color{blue}{t \cdot z}\right)\right) \]

   5. Applied rewrites 94.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, t \cdot z\right)\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 91.0%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \cdot y \leq -2 \cdot 10^{+124} \lor \neg \left(x \cdot y \leq 10^{+37}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, y \cdot x\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, t \cdot z\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 5: 84.7% accurate, 0.7× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \cdot y \leq -1 \cdot 10^{+236} \lor \neg \left(x \cdot y \leq 2 \cdot 10^{+181}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot x\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, t \cdot z\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= (* x y) -1e+236) (not (<= (* x y) 2e+181)))
   (* y x)
   (fma b a (fma i c (* t z)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double tmp;
	if (((x * y) <= -1e+236) || !((x * y) <= 2e+181)) {
		tmp = y * x;
	} else {
		tmp = fma(b, a, fma(i, c, (t * z)));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((Float64(x * y) <= -1e+236) || !(Float64(x * y) <= 2e+181))
		tmp = Float64(y * x);
	else
		tmp = fma(b, a, fma(i, c, Float64(t * z)));
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := If[Or[LessEqual[N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision], -1e+236], N[Not[LessEqual[N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision], 2e+181]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(y * x), $MachinePrecision], N[(b * a + N[(i * c + N[(t * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (*.f64 x y) < -1.00000000000000005e236 or 1.9999999999999998e181 < (*.f64 x y)

   1. Initial program 85.9%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in z around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(c \cdot i + x \cdot y\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{b \cdot a} + \left(c \cdot i + x \cdot y\right) \]

      2. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, c \cdot i + x \cdot y\right)} \]

      3. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \color{blue}{i \cdot c} + x \cdot y\right) \]

      4. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, x \cdot y\right)}\right) \]

      5. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, \color{blue}{y \cdot x}\right)\right) \]

      6. lower-*.f64 88.0

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, \color{blue}{y \cdot x}\right)\right) \]

   5. Applied rewrites 88.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, y \cdot x\right)\right)} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

   7. Applied rewrites 88.0%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \mathsf{fma}\left(y, x, c \cdot i\right)\right) \]

   8. Taylor expanded in x around inf

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot y} \]
   9. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot x} \]

      2. lower-*.f64 80.3

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot x} \]

   10. Applied rewrites 80.3%

       \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot x} \]

   if -1.00000000000000005e236 < (*.f64 x y) < 1.9999999999999998e181

   1. Initial program 98.4%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(c \cdot i + t \cdot z\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{b \cdot a} + \left(c \cdot i + t \cdot z\right) \]

      2. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, c \cdot i + t \cdot z\right)} \]

      3. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \color{blue}{i \cdot c} + t \cdot z\right) \]

      4. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, t \cdot z\right)}\right) \]

      5. lower-*.f64 86.8

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, \color{blue}{t \cdot z}\right)\right) \]

   5. Applied rewrites 86.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, t \cdot z\right)\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 85.2%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \cdot y \leq -1 \cdot 10^{+236} \lor \neg \left(x \cdot y \leq 2 \cdot 10^{+181}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot x\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, t \cdot z\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 6: 88.6% accurate, 0.7× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;a \cdot b \leq -5 \cdot 10^{+170}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \mathsf{fma}\left(y, x, c \cdot i\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;a \cdot b \leq 5 \cdot 10^{+102}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, \mathsf{fma}\left(t, z, y \cdot x\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, t, a \cdot b\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= (* a b) -5e+170)
   (fma b a (fma y x (* c i)))
   (if (<= (* a b) 5e+102)
     (fma i c (fma t z (* y x)))
     (fma i c (fma z t (* a b))))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double tmp;
	if ((a * b) <= -5e+170) {
		tmp = fma(b, a, fma(y, x, (c * i)));
	} else if ((a * b) <= 5e+102) {
		tmp = fma(i, c, fma(t, z, (y * x)));
	} else {
		tmp = fma(i, c, fma(z, t, (a * b)));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (Float64(a * b) <= -5e+170)
		tmp = fma(b, a, fma(y, x, Float64(c * i)));
	elseif (Float64(a * b) <= 5e+102)
		tmp = fma(i, c, fma(t, z, Float64(y * x)));
	else
		tmp = fma(i, c, fma(z, t, Float64(a * b)));
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := If[LessEqual[N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision], -5e+170], N[(b * a + N[(y * x + N[(c * i), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision], 5e+102], N[(i * c + N[(t * z + N[(y * x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(i * c + N[(z * t + N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if (*.f64 a b) < -4.99999999999999977e170

   1. Initial program 89.3%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in z around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(c \cdot i + x \cdot y\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{b \cdot a} + \left(c \cdot i + x \cdot y\right) \]

      2. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, c \cdot i + x \cdot y\right)} \]

      3. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \color{blue}{i \cdot c} + x \cdot y\right) \]

      4. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, x \cdot y\right)}\right) \]

      5. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, \color{blue}{y \cdot x}\right)\right) \]

      6. lower-*.f64 93.2

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, \color{blue}{y \cdot x}\right)\right) \]

   5. Applied rewrites 93.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, y \cdot x\right)\right)} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

   7. Applied rewrites 96.7%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \mathsf{fma}\left(y, x, c \cdot i\right)\right) \]

   if -4.99999999999999977e170 < (*.f64 a b) < 5e102

   1. Initial program 97.3%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in a around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c \cdot i + \left(t \cdot z + x \cdot y\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{i \cdot c} + \left(t \cdot z + x \cdot y\right) \]

      2. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, t \cdot z + x \cdot y\right)} \]

      3. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(t, z, x \cdot y\right)}\right) \]

      4. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, \mathsf{fma}\left(t, z, \color{blue}{y \cdot x}\right)\right) \]

      5. lower-*.f64 93.6

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, \mathsf{fma}\left(t, z, \color{blue}{y \cdot x}\right)\right) \]

   5. Applied rewrites 93.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, \mathsf{fma}\left(t, z, y \cdot x\right)\right)} \]

   if 5e102 < (*.f64 a b)

   1. Initial program 90.7%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Add Preprocessing
   3. Step-by-step derivation

      1. lift-+.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i} \]

      2. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c \cdot i + \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      3. lift-*.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c \cdot i} + \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) \]

      4. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{i \cdot c} + \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) \]

      5. lower-fma.f64 93.0

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      6. lift-+.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b}\right) \]

      7. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      8. lift-*.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, \color{blue}{a \cdot b} + \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)\right) \]

      9. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, \color{blue}{b \cdot a} + \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)\right) \]

      10. lower-fma.f64 93.0

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      11. lift-+.f64 N/A

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, \mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \color{blue}{x \cdot y + z \cdot t}\right)\right) \]

      12. +-commutative N/A

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, \mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \color{blue}{z \cdot t + x \cdot y}\right)\right) \]

      13. lift-*.f64 N/A

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, \mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \color{blue}{z \cdot t} + x \cdot y\right)\right) \]

      14. *-commutative N/A

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, \mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \color{blue}{t \cdot z} + x \cdot y\right)\right) \]

      15. lower-fma.f64 93.0

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, \mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(t, z, x \cdot y\right)}\right)\right) \]

      16. lift-*.f64 N/A

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, \mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \mathsf{fma}\left(t, z, \color{blue}{x \cdot y}\right)\right)\right) \]

      17. *-commutative N/A

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, \mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \mathsf{fma}\left(t, z, \color{blue}{y \cdot x}\right)\right)\right) \]

      18. lower-*.f64 93.0

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, \mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \mathsf{fma}\left(t, z, \color{blue}{y \cdot x}\right)\right)\right) \]

   4. Applied rewrites 93.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, \mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \mathsf{fma}\left(t, z, y \cdot x\right)\right)\right)} \]

   5. Taylor expanded in x around 0

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, \color{blue}{a \cdot b + t \cdot z}\right) \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, \color{blue}{t \cdot z + a \cdot b}\right) \]

      2. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, \color{blue}{z \cdot t} + a \cdot b\right) \]

      3. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, t, a \cdot b\right)}\right) \]

      4. lower-*.f64 93.2

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, t, \color{blue}{a \cdot b}\right)\right) \]

   7. Applied rewrites 93.2%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, t, a \cdot b\right)}\right) \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.
4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 7: 63.0% accurate, 0.9× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \cdot y \leq -2 \cdot 10^{+124} \lor \neg \left(x \cdot y \leq 10^{+179}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot x\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, z \cdot t\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= (* x y) -2e+124) (not (<= (* x y) 1e+179)))
   (* y x)
   (fma i c (* z t))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double tmp;
	if (((x * y) <= -2e+124) || !((x * y) <= 1e+179)) {
		tmp = y * x;
	} else {
		tmp = fma(i, c, (z * t));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((Float64(x * y) <= -2e+124) || !(Float64(x * y) <= 1e+179))
		tmp = Float64(y * x);
	else
		tmp = fma(i, c, Float64(z * t));
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := If[Or[LessEqual[N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision], -2e+124], N[Not[LessEqual[N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision], 1e+179]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(y * x), $MachinePrecision], N[(i * c + N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (*.f64 x y) < -1.9999999999999999e124 or 9.9999999999999998e178 < (*.f64 x y)

   1. Initial program 89.5%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in z around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(c \cdot i + x \cdot y\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{b \cdot a} + \left(c \cdot i + x \cdot y\right) \]

      2. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, c \cdot i + x \cdot y\right)} \]

      3. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \color{blue}{i \cdot c} + x \cdot y\right) \]

      4. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, x \cdot y\right)}\right) \]

      5. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, \color{blue}{y \cdot x}\right)\right) \]

      6. lower-*.f64 87.6

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, \color{blue}{y \cdot x}\right)\right) \]

   5. Applied rewrites 87.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, y \cdot x\right)\right)} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

   7. Applied rewrites 87.6%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \mathsf{fma}\left(y, x, c \cdot i\right)\right) \]

   8. Taylor expanded in x around inf

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot y} \]
   9. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot x} \]

      2. lower-*.f64 69.5

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot x} \]

   10. Applied rewrites 69.5%

       \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot x} \]

   if -1.9999999999999999e124 < (*.f64 x y) < 9.9999999999999998e178

   1. Initial program 98.2%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in a around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c \cdot i + \left(t \cdot z + x \cdot y\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{i \cdot c} + \left(t \cdot z + x \cdot y\right) \]

      2. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, t \cdot z + x \cdot y\right)} \]

      3. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(t, z, x \cdot y\right)}\right) \]

      4. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, \mathsf{fma}\left(t, z, \color{blue}{y \cdot x}\right)\right) \]

      5. lower-*.f64 76.5

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, \mathsf{fma}\left(t, z, \color{blue}{y \cdot x}\right)\right) \]

   5. Applied rewrites 76.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, \mathsf{fma}\left(t, z, y \cdot x\right)\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in x around 0

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, t \cdot z\right) \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

   8. Applied rewrites 67.8%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, z \cdot t\right) \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 68.4%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \cdot y \leq -2 \cdot 10^{+124} \lor \neg \left(x \cdot y \leq 10^{+179}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot x\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, z \cdot t\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 8: 61.6% accurate, 0.9× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \cdot y \leq -1 \cdot 10^{+236} \lor \neg \left(x \cdot y \leq 2 \cdot 10^{+51}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot x\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, c \cdot i\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= (* x y) -1e+236) (not (<= (* x y) 2e+51)))
   (* y x)
   (fma b a (* c i))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double tmp;
	if (((x * y) <= -1e+236) || !((x * y) <= 2e+51)) {
		tmp = y * x;
	} else {
		tmp = fma(b, a, (c * i));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((Float64(x * y) <= -1e+236) || !(Float64(x * y) <= 2e+51))
		tmp = Float64(y * x);
	else
		tmp = fma(b, a, Float64(c * i));
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := If[Or[LessEqual[N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision], -1e+236], N[Not[LessEqual[N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision], 2e+51]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(y * x), $MachinePrecision], N[(b * a + N[(c * i), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (*.f64 x y) < -1.00000000000000005e236 or 2e51 < (*.f64 x y)

   1. Initial program 89.1%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in z around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(c \cdot i + x \cdot y\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{b \cdot a} + \left(c \cdot i + x \cdot y\right) \]

      2. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, c \cdot i + x \cdot y\right)} \]

      3. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \color{blue}{i \cdot c} + x \cdot y\right) \]

      4. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, x \cdot y\right)}\right) \]

      5. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, \color{blue}{y \cdot x}\right)\right) \]

      6. lower-*.f64 86.1

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, \color{blue}{y \cdot x}\right)\right) \]

   5. Applied rewrites 86.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, y \cdot x\right)\right)} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

   7. Applied rewrites 86.1%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \mathsf{fma}\left(y, x, c \cdot i\right)\right) \]

   8. Taylor expanded in x around inf

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot y} \]
   9. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot x} \]

      2. lower-*.f64 71.9

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot x} \]

   10. Applied rewrites 71.9%

       \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot x} \]

   if -1.00000000000000005e236 < (*.f64 x y) < 2e51

   1. Initial program 98.2%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in z around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(c \cdot i + x \cdot y\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{b \cdot a} + \left(c \cdot i + x \cdot y\right) \]

      2. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, c \cdot i + x \cdot y\right)} \]

      3. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \color{blue}{i \cdot c} + x \cdot y\right) \]

      4. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, x \cdot y\right)}\right) \]

      5. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, \color{blue}{y \cdot x}\right)\right) \]

      6. lower-*.f64 73.6

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, \color{blue}{y \cdot x}\right)\right) \]

   5. Applied rewrites 73.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, y \cdot x\right)\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in x around 0

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, c \cdot i\right) \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

   8. Applied rewrites 64.0%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, c \cdot i\right) \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 66.5%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \cdot y \leq -1 \cdot 10^{+236} \lor \neg \left(x \cdot y \leq 2 \cdot 10^{+51}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot x\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, c \cdot i\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 9: 42.3% accurate, 1.1× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \cdot y \leq -2 \cdot 10^{+124} \lor \neg \left(x \cdot y \leq 2 \cdot 10^{+51}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot x\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;i \cdot c\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= (* x y) -2e+124) (not (<= (* x y) 2e+51))) (* y x) (* i c)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double tmp;
	if (((x * y) <= -2e+124) || !((x * y) <= 2e+51)) {
		tmp = y * x;
	} else {
		tmp = i * c;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: c
    real(8), intent (in) :: i
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (((x * y) <= (-2d+124)) .or. (.not. ((x * y) <= 2d+51))) then
        tmp = y * x
    else
        tmp = i * c
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double tmp;
	if (((x * y) <= -2e+124) || !((x * y) <= 2e+51)) {
		tmp = y * x;
	} else {
		tmp = i * c;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i):
	tmp = 0
	if ((x * y) <= -2e+124) or not ((x * y) <= 2e+51):
		tmp = y * x
	else:
		tmp = i * c
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((Float64(x * y) <= -2e+124) || !(Float64(x * y) <= 2e+51))
		tmp = Float64(y * x);
	else
		tmp = Float64(i * c);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (((x * y) <= -2e+124) || ~(((x * y) <= 2e+51)))
		tmp = y * x;
	else
		tmp = i * c;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := If[Or[LessEqual[N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision], -2e+124], N[Not[LessEqual[N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision], 2e+51]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(y * x), $MachinePrecision], N[(i * c), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (*.f64 x y) < -1.9999999999999999e124 or 2e51 < (*.f64 x y)

   1. Initial program 91.3%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in z around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(c \cdot i + x \cdot y\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{b \cdot a} + \left(c \cdot i + x \cdot y\right) \]

      2. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, c \cdot i + x \cdot y\right)} \]

      3. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \color{blue}{i \cdot c} + x \cdot y\right) \]

      4. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, x \cdot y\right)}\right) \]

      5. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, \color{blue}{y \cdot x}\right)\right) \]

      6. lower-*.f64 86.1

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, \color{blue}{y \cdot x}\right)\right) \]

   5. Applied rewrites 86.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, y \cdot x\right)\right)} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

   7. Applied rewrites 86.1%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \mathsf{fma}\left(y, x, c \cdot i\right)\right) \]

   8. Taylor expanded in x around inf

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot y} \]
   9. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot x} \]

      2. lower-*.f64 65.3

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot x} \]

   10. Applied rewrites 65.3%

       \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot x} \]

   if -1.9999999999999999e124 < (*.f64 x y) < 2e51

   1. Initial program 98.0%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in c around inf

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c \cdot i} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{i \cdot c} \]

      2. lower-*.f64 43.2

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{i \cdot c} \]

   5. Applied rewrites 43.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{i \cdot c} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 52.2%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \cdot y \leq -2 \cdot 10^{+124} \lor \neg \left(x \cdot y \leq 2 \cdot 10^{+51}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot x\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;i \cdot c\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 10: 41.6% accurate, 1.1× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \cdot t \leq -2 \cdot 10^{+116} \lor \neg \left(z \cdot t \leq 5 \cdot 10^{+215}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;t \cdot z\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;i \cdot c\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= (* z t) -2e+116) (not (<= (* z t) 5e+215))) (* t z) (* i c)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double tmp;
	if (((z * t) <= -2e+116) || !((z * t) <= 5e+215)) {
		tmp = t * z;
	} else {
		tmp = i * c;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: c
    real(8), intent (in) :: i
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (((z * t) <= (-2d+116)) .or. (.not. ((z * t) <= 5d+215))) then
        tmp = t * z
    else
        tmp = i * c
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double tmp;
	if (((z * t) <= -2e+116) || !((z * t) <= 5e+215)) {
		tmp = t * z;
	} else {
		tmp = i * c;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i):
	tmp = 0
	if ((z * t) <= -2e+116) or not ((z * t) <= 5e+215):
		tmp = t * z
	else:
		tmp = i * c
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((Float64(z * t) <= -2e+116) || !(Float64(z * t) <= 5e+215))
		tmp = Float64(t * z);
	else
		tmp = Float64(i * c);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (((z * t) <= -2e+116) || ~(((z * t) <= 5e+215)))
		tmp = t * z;
	else
		tmp = i * c;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := If[Or[LessEqual[N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision], -2e+116], N[Not[LessEqual[N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision], 5e+215]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(t * z), $MachinePrecision], N[(i * c), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (*.f64 z t) < -2.00000000000000003e116 or 5.0000000000000001e215 < (*.f64 z t)

   1. Initial program 88.9%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in z around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(c \cdot i + x \cdot y\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{b \cdot a} + \left(c \cdot i + x \cdot y\right) \]

      2. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, c \cdot i + x \cdot y\right)} \]

      3. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \color{blue}{i \cdot c} + x \cdot y\right) \]

      4. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, x \cdot y\right)}\right) \]

      5. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, \color{blue}{y \cdot x}\right)\right) \]

      6. lower-*.f64 33.6

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, \color{blue}{y \cdot x}\right)\right) \]

   5. Applied rewrites 33.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, y \cdot x\right)\right)} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

   7. Applied rewrites 32.0%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \mathsf{fma}\left(y, x, c \cdot i\right)\right) \]

   8. Taylor expanded in x around inf

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot y} \]
   9. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot x} \]

      2. lower-*.f64 18.0

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot x} \]

   10. Applied rewrites 18.0%

       \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot x} \]

   11. Taylor expanded in z around inf

       \[\leadsto \color{blue}{t \cdot z} \]
   12. Step-by-step derivation

       1. lower-*.f64 70.2

          \[\leadsto \color{blue}{t \cdot z} \]

   13. Applied rewrites 70.2%

       \[\leadsto \color{blue}{t \cdot z} \]

   if -2.00000000000000003e116 < (*.f64 z t) < 5.0000000000000001e215

   1. Initial program 97.4%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in c around inf

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c \cdot i} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{i \cdot c} \]

      2. lower-*.f64 38.5

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{i \cdot c} \]

   5. Applied rewrites 38.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{i \cdot c} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 46.3%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \cdot t \leq -2 \cdot 10^{+116} \lor \neg \left(z \cdot t \leq 5 \cdot 10^{+215}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;t \cdot z\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;i \cdot c\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 11: 42.0% accurate, 1.1× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;a \cdot b \leq -3.8 \cdot 10^{+192} \lor \neg \left(a \cdot b \leq 8.2 \cdot 10^{+146}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot b\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;i \cdot c\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= (* a b) -3.8e+192) (not (<= (* a b) 8.2e+146))) (* a b) (* i c)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double tmp;
	if (((a * b) <= -3.8e+192) || !((a * b) <= 8.2e+146)) {
		tmp = a * b;
	} else {
		tmp = i * c;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: c
    real(8), intent (in) :: i
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (((a * b) <= (-3.8d+192)) .or. (.not. ((a * b) <= 8.2d+146))) then
        tmp = a * b
    else
        tmp = i * c
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double tmp;
	if (((a * b) <= -3.8e+192) || !((a * b) <= 8.2e+146)) {
		tmp = a * b;
	} else {
		tmp = i * c;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i):
	tmp = 0
	if ((a * b) <= -3.8e+192) or not ((a * b) <= 8.2e+146):
		tmp = a * b
	else:
		tmp = i * c
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((Float64(a * b) <= -3.8e+192) || !(Float64(a * b) <= 8.2e+146))
		tmp = Float64(a * b);
	else
		tmp = Float64(i * c);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (((a * b) <= -3.8e+192) || ~(((a * b) <= 8.2e+146)))
		tmp = a * b;
	else
		tmp = i * c;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := If[Or[LessEqual[N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision], -3.8e+192], N[Not[LessEqual[N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision], 8.2e+146]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision], N[(i * c), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (*.f64 a b) < -3.7999999999999999e192 or 8.2000000000000007e146 < (*.f64 a b)

   1. Initial program 88.7%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Add Preprocessing
   3. Step-by-step derivation

      1. lift-+.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i} \]

      2. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c \cdot i + \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      3. lift-*.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c \cdot i} + \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) \]

      4. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{i \cdot c} + \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) \]

      5. lower-fma.f64 90.3

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      6. lift-+.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b}\right) \]

      7. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      8. lift-*.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, \color{blue}{a \cdot b} + \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)\right) \]

      9. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, \color{blue}{b \cdot a} + \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)\right) \]

      10. lower-fma.f64 93.5

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      11. lift-+.f64 N/A

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, \mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \color{blue}{x \cdot y + z \cdot t}\right)\right) \]

      12. +-commutative N/A

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, \mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \color{blue}{z \cdot t + x \cdot y}\right)\right) \]

      13. lift-*.f64 N/A

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, \mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \color{blue}{z \cdot t} + x \cdot y\right)\right) \]

      14. *-commutative N/A

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, \mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \color{blue}{t \cdot z} + x \cdot y\right)\right) \]

      15. lower-fma.f64 93.5

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, \mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(t, z, x \cdot y\right)}\right)\right) \]

      16. lift-*.f64 N/A

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, \mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \mathsf{fma}\left(t, z, \color{blue}{x \cdot y}\right)\right)\right) \]

      17. *-commutative N/A

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, \mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \mathsf{fma}\left(t, z, \color{blue}{y \cdot x}\right)\right)\right) \]

      18. lower-*.f64 93.5

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, \mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \mathsf{fma}\left(t, z, \color{blue}{y \cdot x}\right)\right)\right) \]

   4. Applied rewrites 93.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, \mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \mathsf{fma}\left(t, z, y \cdot x\right)\right)\right)} \]

   5. Taylor expanded in a around inf

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot b} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. lower-*.f64 71.5

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot b} \]

   7. Applied rewrites 71.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot b} \]

   if -3.7999999999999999e192 < (*.f64 a b) < 8.2000000000000007e146

   1. Initial program 97.4%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in c around inf

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c \cdot i} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{i \cdot c} \]

      2. lower-*.f64 35.8

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{i \cdot c} \]

   5. Applied rewrites 35.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{i \cdot c} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 44.5%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;a \cdot b \leq -3.8 \cdot 10^{+192} \lor \neg \left(a \cdot b \leq 8.2 \cdot 10^{+146}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot b\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;i \cdot c\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 12: 27.9% accurate, 5.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ a \cdot b \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b c i) :precision binary64 (* a b))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	return a * b;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: c
    real(8), intent (in) :: i
    code = a * b
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	return a * b;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i):
	return a * b

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	return Float64(a * b)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = a * b;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 95.3%

   \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
2. Add Preprocessing
3. Step-by-step derivation

   1. lift-+.f64 N/A

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i} \]

   2. +-commutative N/A

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c \cdot i + \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

   3. lift-*.f64 N/A

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c \cdot i} + \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) \]

   4. *-commutative N/A

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{i \cdot c} + \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) \]

   5. lower-fma.f64 96.5

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

   6. lift-+.f64 N/A

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b}\right) \]

   7. +-commutative N/A

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

   8. lift-*.f64 N/A

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, \color{blue}{a \cdot b} + \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)\right) \]

   9. *-commutative N/A

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, \color{blue}{b \cdot a} + \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)\right) \]

   10. lower-fma.f64 97.2

       \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

   11. lift-+.f64 N/A

       \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, \mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \color{blue}{x \cdot y + z \cdot t}\right)\right) \]

   12. +-commutative N/A

       \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, \mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \color{blue}{z \cdot t + x \cdot y}\right)\right) \]

   13. lift-*.f64 N/A

       \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, \mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \color{blue}{z \cdot t} + x \cdot y\right)\right) \]

   14. *-commutative N/A

       \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, \mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \color{blue}{t \cdot z} + x \cdot y\right)\right) \]

   15. lower-fma.f64 97.6

       \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, \mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(t, z, x \cdot y\right)}\right)\right) \]

   16. lift-*.f64 N/A

       \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, \mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \mathsf{fma}\left(t, z, \color{blue}{x \cdot y}\right)\right)\right) \]

   17. *-commutative N/A

       \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, \mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \mathsf{fma}\left(t, z, \color{blue}{y \cdot x}\right)\right)\right) \]

   18. lower-*.f64 97.6

       \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, \mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \mathsf{fma}\left(t, z, \color{blue}{y \cdot x}\right)\right)\right) \]

4. Applied rewrites 97.6%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, \mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \mathsf{fma}\left(t, z, y \cdot x\right)\right)\right)} \]

5. Taylor expanded in a around inf

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot b} \]
6. Step-by-step derivation

   1. lower-*.f64 21.9

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot b} \]

7. Applied rewrites 21.9%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot b} \]

8. Final simplification 21.9%

   \[\leadsto a \cdot b \]
9. Add Preprocessing

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2024339 
(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
  :name "Linear.V4:$cdot from linear-1.19.1.3, C"
  :precision binary64
  (+ (+ (+ (* x y) (* z t)) (* a b)) (* c i)))