Graphics.Rasterific.CubicBezier:cachedBezierAt from Rasterific-0.6.1

Percentage Accurate: 92.2% → 96.8%

Time: 7.2s

Alternatives: 10

Speedup: 0.8×

• 33.3% of points produce a very large (infinite) output. You may want to add a precondition.

Specification

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b)
 :precision binary64
 (+ (+ (+ x (* y z)) (* t a)) (* (* a z) b)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	return ((x + (y * z)) + (t * a)) + ((a * z) * b);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    code = ((x + (y * z)) + (t * a)) + ((a * z) * b)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	return ((x + (y * z)) + (t * a)) + ((a * z) * b);
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b):
	return ((x + (y * z)) + (t * a)) + ((a * z) * b)

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(x + Float64(y * z)) + Float64(t * a)) + Float64(Float64(a * z) * b))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = ((x + (y * z)) + (t * a)) + ((a * z) * b);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := N[(N[(N[(x + N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(t * a), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(a * z), $MachinePrecision] * b), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Initial Program: 92.2% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b)
 :precision binary64
 (+ (+ (+ x (* y z)) (* t a)) (* (* a z) b)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	return ((x + (y * z)) + (t * a)) + ((a * z) * b);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    code = ((x + (y * z)) + (t * a)) + ((a * z) * b)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	return ((x + (y * z)) + (t * a)) + ((a * z) * b);
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b):
	return ((x + (y * z)) + (t * a)) + ((a * z) * b)

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(x + Float64(y * z)) + Float64(t * a)) + Float64(Float64(a * z) * b))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = ((x + (y * z)) + (t * a)) + ((a * z) * b);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := N[(N[(N[(x + N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(t * a), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(a * z), $MachinePrecision] * b), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Alternative 1: 96.8% accurate, 0.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_1 := \left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b\\ \mathbf{if}\;t\_1 \leq \infty:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_1\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, y\right), z, x\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_1 (+ (+ (+ x (* y z)) (* t a)) (* (* a z) b))))
   (if (<= t_1 INFINITY) t_1 (fma (fma b a y) z x))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double t_1 = ((x + (y * z)) + (t * a)) + ((a * z) * b);
	double tmp;
	if (t_1 <= ((double) INFINITY)) {
		tmp = t_1;
	} else {
		tmp = fma(fma(b, a, y), z, x);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	t_1 = Float64(Float64(Float64(x + Float64(y * z)) + Float64(t * a)) + Float64(Float64(a * z) * b))
	tmp = 0.0
	if (t_1 <= Inf)
		tmp = t_1;
	else
		tmp = fma(fma(b, a, y), z, x);
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := Block[{t$95$1 = N[(N[(N[(x + N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(t * a), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(a * z), $MachinePrecision] * b), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[t$95$1, Infinity], t$95$1, N[(N[(b * a + y), $MachinePrecision] * z + x), $MachinePrecision]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (+.f64 (+.f64 (+.f64 x (*.f64 y z)) (*.f64 t a)) (*.f64 (*.f64 a z) b)) < +inf.0

   1. Initial program 97.5%

      \[\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   if +inf.0 < (+.f64 (+.f64 (+.f64 x (*.f64 y z)) (*.f64 t a)) (*.f64 (*.f64 a z) b))

   1. Initial program 0.0%

      \[\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in t around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \left(a \cdot \left(b \cdot z\right) + y \cdot z\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(a \cdot \left(b \cdot z\right) + y \cdot z\right) + x} \]

      2. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z + a \cdot \left(b \cdot z\right)\right)} + x \]

      3. associate-*r* N/A

         \[\leadsto \left(y \cdot z + \color{blue}{\left(a \cdot b\right) \cdot z}\right) + x \]

      4. distribute-rgt-in N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(y + a \cdot b\right)} + x \]

      5. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y + a \cdot b\right) \cdot z} + x \]

      6. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y + a \cdot b, z, x\right)} \]

      7. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{a \cdot b + y}, z, x\right) \]

      8. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{b \cdot a} + y, z, x\right) \]

      9. lower-fma.f64 72.2

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, y\right)}, z, x\right) \]

   5. Applied rewrites 72.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, y\right), z, x\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 2: 96.0% accurate, 0.8× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;a \leq -2.6 \cdot 10^{+60} \lor \neg \left(a \leq 4.5 \cdot 10^{+163}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(b, z, t\right), a, x\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(b \cdot a, z, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, t, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, y, x\right)\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= a -2.6e+60) (not (<= a 4.5e+163)))
   (fma (fma b z t) a x)
   (fma (* b a) z (fma a t (fma z y x)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if ((a <= -2.6e+60) || !(a <= 4.5e+163)) {
		tmp = fma(fma(b, z, t), a, x);
	} else {
		tmp = fma((b * a), z, fma(a, t, fma(z, y, x)));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((a <= -2.6e+60) || !(a <= 4.5e+163))
		tmp = fma(fma(b, z, t), a, x);
	else
		tmp = fma(Float64(b * a), z, fma(a, t, fma(z, y, x)));
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := If[Or[LessEqual[a, -2.6e+60], N[Not[LessEqual[a, 4.5e+163]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(N[(b * z + t), $MachinePrecision] * a + x), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[(b * a), $MachinePrecision] * z + N[(a * t + N[(z * y + x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if a < -2.60000000000000008e60 or 4.49999999999999988e163 < a

   1. Initial program 81.5%

      \[\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in y around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \left(a \cdot t + a \cdot \left(b \cdot z\right)\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. distribute-lft-in N/A

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(t + b \cdot z\right)} \]

      2. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(t + b \cdot z\right) + x} \]

      3. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(t + b \cdot z\right) \cdot a} + x \]

      4. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(t + b \cdot z, a, x\right)} \]

      5. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{b \cdot z + t}, a, x\right) \]

      6. lower-fma.f64 92.3

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, z, t\right)}, a, x\right) \]

   5. Applied rewrites 92.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(b, z, t\right), a, x\right)} \]

   if -2.60000000000000008e60 < a < 4.49999999999999988e163

   1. Initial program 94.9%

      \[\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Add Preprocessing
   3. Step-by-step derivation

      1. lift-+.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b} \]

      2. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b + \left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right)} \]

      3. lift-*.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b} + \left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) \]

      4. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{b \cdot \left(a \cdot z\right)} + \left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) \]

      5. lift-*.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto b \cdot \color{blue}{\left(a \cdot z\right)} + \left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) \]

      6. associate-*r* N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(b \cdot a\right) \cdot z} + \left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) \]

      7. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b \cdot a, z, \left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right)} \]

      8. lower-*.f64 96.7

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{b \cdot a}, z, \left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) \]

      9. lift-+.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(b \cdot a, z, \color{blue}{\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a}\right) \]

      10. +-commutative N/A

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(b \cdot a, z, \color{blue}{t \cdot a + \left(x + y \cdot z\right)}\right) \]

      11. lift-*.f64 N/A

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(b \cdot a, z, \color{blue}{t \cdot a} + \left(x + y \cdot z\right)\right) \]

      12. *-commutative N/A

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(b \cdot a, z, \color{blue}{a \cdot t} + \left(x + y \cdot z\right)\right) \]

      13. lower-fma.f64 96.7

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(b \cdot a, z, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(a, t, x + y \cdot z\right)}\right) \]

      14. lift-+.f64 N/A

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(b \cdot a, z, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, t, \color{blue}{x + y \cdot z}\right)\right) \]

      15. +-commutative N/A

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(b \cdot a, z, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, t, \color{blue}{y \cdot z + x}\right)\right) \]

      16. lift-*.f64 N/A

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(b \cdot a, z, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, t, \color{blue}{y \cdot z} + x\right)\right) \]

      17. *-commutative N/A

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(b \cdot a, z, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, t, \color{blue}{z \cdot y} + x\right)\right) \]

      18. lower-fma.f64 96.7

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(b \cdot a, z, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, t, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, y, x\right)}\right)\right) \]

   4. Applied rewrites 96.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b \cdot a, z, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, t, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, y, x\right)\right)\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 95.3%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;a \leq -2.6 \cdot 10^{+60} \lor \neg \left(a \leq 4.5 \cdot 10^{+163}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(b, z, t\right), a, x\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(b \cdot a, z, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, t, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, y, x\right)\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 3: 85.1% accurate, 1.2× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;b \leq -1.46 \cdot 10^{+48} \lor \neg \left(b \leq 2.5 \cdot 10^{-104}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, y\right), z, x\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(a, t, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, y, x\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= b -1.46e+48) (not (<= b 2.5e-104)))
   (fma (fma b a y) z x)
   (fma a t (fma z y x))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if ((b <= -1.46e+48) || !(b <= 2.5e-104)) {
		tmp = fma(fma(b, a, y), z, x);
	} else {
		tmp = fma(a, t, fma(z, y, x));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((b <= -1.46e+48) || !(b <= 2.5e-104))
		tmp = fma(fma(b, a, y), z, x);
	else
		tmp = fma(a, t, fma(z, y, x));
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := If[Or[LessEqual[b, -1.46e+48], N[Not[LessEqual[b, 2.5e-104]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(N[(b * a + y), $MachinePrecision] * z + x), $MachinePrecision], N[(a * t + N[(z * y + x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if b < -1.46e48 or 2.49999999999999989e-104 < b

   1. Initial program 91.3%

      \[\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in t around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \left(a \cdot \left(b \cdot z\right) + y \cdot z\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(a \cdot \left(b \cdot z\right) + y \cdot z\right) + x} \]

      2. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z + a \cdot \left(b \cdot z\right)\right)} + x \]

      3. associate-*r* N/A

         \[\leadsto \left(y \cdot z + \color{blue}{\left(a \cdot b\right) \cdot z}\right) + x \]

      4. distribute-rgt-in N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(y + a \cdot b\right)} + x \]

      5. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y + a \cdot b\right) \cdot z} + x \]

      6. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y + a \cdot b, z, x\right)} \]

      7. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{a \cdot b + y}, z, x\right) \]

      8. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{b \cdot a} + y, z, x\right) \]

      9. lower-fma.f64 82.7

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, y\right)}, z, x\right) \]

   5. Applied rewrites 82.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, y\right), z, x\right)} \]

   if -1.46e48 < b < 2.49999999999999989e-104

   1. Initial program 89.9%

      \[\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in t around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \left(a \cdot \left(b \cdot z\right) + y \cdot z\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(a \cdot \left(b \cdot z\right) + y \cdot z\right) + x} \]

      2. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z + a \cdot \left(b \cdot z\right)\right)} + x \]

      3. associate-*r* N/A

         \[\leadsto \left(y \cdot z + \color{blue}{\left(a \cdot b\right) \cdot z}\right) + x \]

      4. distribute-rgt-in N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(y + a \cdot b\right)} + x \]

      5. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y + a \cdot b\right) \cdot z} + x \]

      6. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y + a \cdot b, z, x\right)} \]

      7. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{a \cdot b + y}, z, x\right) \]

      8. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{b \cdot a} + y, z, x\right) \]

      9. lower-fma.f64 68.8

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, y\right)}, z, x\right) \]

   5. Applied rewrites 68.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, y\right), z, x\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in b around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \left(a \cdot t + y \cdot z\right)} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+r+ N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + a \cdot t\right) + y \cdot z} \]

      2. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(a \cdot t + x\right)} + y \cdot z \]

      3. associate-+l+ N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot t + \left(x + y \cdot z\right)} \]

      4. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(a, t, x + y \cdot z\right)} \]

      5. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(a, t, \color{blue}{y \cdot z + x}\right) \]

      6. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(a, t, \color{blue}{z \cdot y} + x\right) \]

      7. lower-fma.f64 95.8

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(a, t, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, y, x\right)}\right) \]

   8. Applied rewrites 95.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(a, t, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, y, x\right)\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 88.7%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;b \leq -1.46 \cdot 10^{+48} \lor \neg \left(b \leq 2.5 \cdot 10^{-104}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, y\right), z, x\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(a, t, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, y, x\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 4: 82.5% accurate, 1.2× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -2.2 \cdot 10^{+101} \lor \neg \left(z \leq 2.55 \cdot 10^{+69}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, y\right) \cdot z\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(a, t, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, y, x\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= z -2.2e+101) (not (<= z 2.55e+69)))
   (* (fma b a y) z)
   (fma a t (fma z y x))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z <= -2.2e+101) || !(z <= 2.55e+69)) {
		tmp = fma(b, a, y) * z;
	} else {
		tmp = fma(a, t, fma(z, y, x));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((z <= -2.2e+101) || !(z <= 2.55e+69))
		tmp = Float64(fma(b, a, y) * z);
	else
		tmp = fma(a, t, fma(z, y, x));
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := If[Or[LessEqual[z, -2.2e+101], N[Not[LessEqual[z, 2.55e+69]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(N[(b * a + y), $MachinePrecision] * z), $MachinePrecision], N[(a * t + N[(z * y + x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if z < -2.2000000000000001e101 or 2.54999999999999999e69 < z

   1. Initial program 79.9%

      \[\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in z around inf

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(y + a \cdot b\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y + a \cdot b\right) \cdot z} \]

      2. lower-*.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y + a \cdot b\right) \cdot z} \]

      3. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(a \cdot b + y\right)} \cdot z \]

      4. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{b \cdot a} + y\right) \cdot z \]

      5. lower-fma.f64 83.0

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, y\right)} \cdot z \]

   5. Applied rewrites 83.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, y\right) \cdot z} \]

   if -2.2000000000000001e101 < z < 2.54999999999999999e69

   1. Initial program 98.6%

      \[\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in t around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \left(a \cdot \left(b \cdot z\right) + y \cdot z\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(a \cdot \left(b \cdot z\right) + y \cdot z\right) + x} \]

      2. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z + a \cdot \left(b \cdot z\right)\right)} + x \]

      3. associate-*r* N/A

         \[\leadsto \left(y \cdot z + \color{blue}{\left(a \cdot b\right) \cdot z}\right) + x \]

      4. distribute-rgt-in N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(y + a \cdot b\right)} + x \]

      5. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y + a \cdot b\right) \cdot z} + x \]

      6. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y + a \cdot b, z, x\right)} \]

      7. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{a \cdot b + y}, z, x\right) \]

      8. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{b \cdot a} + y, z, x\right) \]

      9. lower-fma.f64 66.9

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, y\right)}, z, x\right) \]

   5. Applied rewrites 66.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, y\right), z, x\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in b around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \left(a \cdot t + y \cdot z\right)} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+r+ N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + a \cdot t\right) + y \cdot z} \]

      2. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(a \cdot t + x\right)} + y \cdot z \]

      3. associate-+l+ N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot t + \left(x + y \cdot z\right)} \]

      4. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(a, t, x + y \cdot z\right)} \]

      5. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(a, t, \color{blue}{y \cdot z + x}\right) \]

      6. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(a, t, \color{blue}{z \cdot y} + x\right) \]

      7. lower-fma.f64 82.8

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(a, t, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, y, x\right)}\right) \]

   8. Applied rewrites 82.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(a, t, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, y, x\right)\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 82.9%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -2.2 \cdot 10^{+101} \lor \neg \left(z \leq 2.55 \cdot 10^{+69}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, y\right) \cdot z\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(a, t, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, y, x\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 5: 85.9% accurate, 1.2× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;b \leq -2.7 \cdot 10^{+48}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(b, z, t\right), a, x\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;b \leq 2.5 \cdot 10^{-104}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(a, t, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, y, x\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, y\right), z, x\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= b -2.7e+48)
   (fma (fma b z t) a x)
   (if (<= b 2.5e-104) (fma a t (fma z y x)) (fma (fma b a y) z x))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if (b <= -2.7e+48) {
		tmp = fma(fma(b, z, t), a, x);
	} else if (b <= 2.5e-104) {
		tmp = fma(a, t, fma(z, y, x));
	} else {
		tmp = fma(fma(b, a, y), z, x);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (b <= -2.7e+48)
		tmp = fma(fma(b, z, t), a, x);
	elseif (b <= 2.5e-104)
		tmp = fma(a, t, fma(z, y, x));
	else
		tmp = fma(fma(b, a, y), z, x);
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := If[LessEqual[b, -2.7e+48], N[(N[(b * z + t), $MachinePrecision] * a + x), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[b, 2.5e-104], N[(a * t + N[(z * y + x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[(b * a + y), $MachinePrecision] * z + x), $MachinePrecision]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if b < -2.70000000000000004e48

   1. Initial program 87.9%

      \[\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in y around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \left(a \cdot t + a \cdot \left(b \cdot z\right)\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. distribute-lft-in N/A

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(t + b \cdot z\right)} \]

      2. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(t + b \cdot z\right) + x} \]

      3. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(t + b \cdot z\right) \cdot a} + x \]

      4. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(t + b \cdot z, a, x\right)} \]

      5. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{b \cdot z + t}, a, x\right) \]

      6. lower-fma.f64 83.7

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, z, t\right)}, a, x\right) \]

   5. Applied rewrites 83.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(b, z, t\right), a, x\right)} \]

   if -2.70000000000000004e48 < b < 2.49999999999999989e-104

   1. Initial program 89.9%

      \[\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in t around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \left(a \cdot \left(b \cdot z\right) + y \cdot z\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(a \cdot \left(b \cdot z\right) + y \cdot z\right) + x} \]

      2. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z + a \cdot \left(b \cdot z\right)\right)} + x \]

      3. associate-*r* N/A

         \[\leadsto \left(y \cdot z + \color{blue}{\left(a \cdot b\right) \cdot z}\right) + x \]

      4. distribute-rgt-in N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(y + a \cdot b\right)} + x \]

      5. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y + a \cdot b\right) \cdot z} + x \]

      6. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y + a \cdot b, z, x\right)} \]

      7. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{a \cdot b + y}, z, x\right) \]

      8. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{b \cdot a} + y, z, x\right) \]

      9. lower-fma.f64 68.8

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, y\right)}, z, x\right) \]

   5. Applied rewrites 68.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, y\right), z, x\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in b around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \left(a \cdot t + y \cdot z\right)} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+r+ N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + a \cdot t\right) + y \cdot z} \]

      2. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(a \cdot t + x\right)} + y \cdot z \]

      3. associate-+l+ N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot t + \left(x + y \cdot z\right)} \]

      4. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(a, t, x + y \cdot z\right)} \]

      5. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(a, t, \color{blue}{y \cdot z + x}\right) \]

      6. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(a, t, \color{blue}{z \cdot y} + x\right) \]

      7. lower-fma.f64 95.8

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(a, t, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, y, x\right)}\right) \]

   8. Applied rewrites 95.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(a, t, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, y, x\right)\right)} \]

   if 2.49999999999999989e-104 < b

   1. Initial program 94.4%

      \[\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in t around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \left(a \cdot \left(b \cdot z\right) + y \cdot z\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(a \cdot \left(b \cdot z\right) + y \cdot z\right) + x} \]

      2. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z + a \cdot \left(b \cdot z\right)\right)} + x \]

      3. associate-*r* N/A

         \[\leadsto \left(y \cdot z + \color{blue}{\left(a \cdot b\right) \cdot z}\right) + x \]

      4. distribute-rgt-in N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(y + a \cdot b\right)} + x \]

      5. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y + a \cdot b\right) \cdot z} + x \]

      6. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y + a \cdot b, z, x\right)} \]

      7. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{a \cdot b + y}, z, x\right) \]

      8. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{b \cdot a} + y, z, x\right) \]

      9. lower-fma.f64 85.6

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, y\right)}, z, x\right) \]

   5. Applied rewrites 85.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, y\right), z, x\right)} \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.
4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 6: 74.4% accurate, 1.2× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -5.3 \cdot 10^{-17} \lor \neg \left(z \leq 1.55 \cdot 10^{+43}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, y\right) \cdot z\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(a, t, x\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= z -5.3e-17) (not (<= z 1.55e+43))) (* (fma b a y) z) (fma a t x)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z <= -5.3e-17) || !(z <= 1.55e+43)) {
		tmp = fma(b, a, y) * z;
	} else {
		tmp = fma(a, t, x);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((z <= -5.3e-17) || !(z <= 1.55e+43))
		tmp = Float64(fma(b, a, y) * z);
	else
		tmp = fma(a, t, x);
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := If[Or[LessEqual[z, -5.3e-17], N[Not[LessEqual[z, 1.55e+43]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(N[(b * a + y), $MachinePrecision] * z), $MachinePrecision], N[(a * t + x), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if z < -5.2999999999999998e-17 or 1.5500000000000001e43 < z

   1. Initial program 84.2%

      \[\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in z around inf

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(y + a \cdot b\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y + a \cdot b\right) \cdot z} \]

      2. lower-*.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y + a \cdot b\right) \cdot z} \]

      3. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(a \cdot b + y\right)} \cdot z \]

      4. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{b \cdot a} + y\right) \cdot z \]

      5. lower-fma.f64 78.2

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, y\right)} \cdot z \]

   5. Applied rewrites 78.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, y\right) \cdot z} \]

   if -5.2999999999999998e-17 < z < 1.5500000000000001e43

   1. Initial program 98.3%

      \[\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in t around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \left(a \cdot \left(b \cdot z\right) + y \cdot z\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(a \cdot \left(b \cdot z\right) + y \cdot z\right) + x} \]

      2. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z + a \cdot \left(b \cdot z\right)\right)} + x \]

      3. associate-*r* N/A

         \[\leadsto \left(y \cdot z + \color{blue}{\left(a \cdot b\right) \cdot z}\right) + x \]

      4. distribute-rgt-in N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(y + a \cdot b\right)} + x \]

      5. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y + a \cdot b\right) \cdot z} + x \]

      6. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y + a \cdot b, z, x\right)} \]

      7. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{a \cdot b + y}, z, x\right) \]

      8. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{b \cdot a} + y, z, x\right) \]

      9. lower-fma.f64 62.9

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, y\right)}, z, x\right) \]

   5. Applied rewrites 62.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, y\right), z, x\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in z around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + a \cdot t} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot t + x} \]

      2. lower-fma.f64 70.4

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(a, t, x\right)} \]

   8. Applied rewrites 70.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(a, t, x\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 74.6%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -5.3 \cdot 10^{-17} \lor \neg \left(z \leq 1.55 \cdot 10^{+43}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, y\right) \cdot z\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(a, t, x\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 7: 62.4% accurate, 1.6× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;t \leq -3 \cdot 10^{-17} \lor \neg \left(t \leq 3 \cdot 10^{+114}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(a, t, x\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(z, y, x\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= t -3e-17) (not (<= t 3e+114))) (fma a t x) (fma z y x)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if ((t <= -3e-17) || !(t <= 3e+114)) {
		tmp = fma(a, t, x);
	} else {
		tmp = fma(z, y, x);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((t <= -3e-17) || !(t <= 3e+114))
		tmp = fma(a, t, x);
	else
		tmp = fma(z, y, x);
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := If[Or[LessEqual[t, -3e-17], N[Not[LessEqual[t, 3e+114]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(a * t + x), $MachinePrecision], N[(z * y + x), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if t < -3.00000000000000006e-17 or 3e114 < t

   1. Initial program 91.7%

      \[\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in t around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \left(a \cdot \left(b \cdot z\right) + y \cdot z\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(a \cdot \left(b \cdot z\right) + y \cdot z\right) + x} \]

      2. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z + a \cdot \left(b \cdot z\right)\right)} + x \]

      3. associate-*r* N/A

         \[\leadsto \left(y \cdot z + \color{blue}{\left(a \cdot b\right) \cdot z}\right) + x \]

      4. distribute-rgt-in N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(y + a \cdot b\right)} + x \]

      5. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y + a \cdot b\right) \cdot z} + x \]

      6. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y + a \cdot b, z, x\right)} \]

      7. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{a \cdot b + y}, z, x\right) \]

      8. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{b \cdot a} + y, z, x\right) \]

      9. lower-fma.f64 54.4

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, y\right)}, z, x\right) \]

   5. Applied rewrites 54.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, y\right), z, x\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in z around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + a \cdot t} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot t + x} \]

      2. lower-fma.f64 66.7

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(a, t, x\right)} \]

   8. Applied rewrites 66.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(a, t, x\right)} \]

   if -3.00000000000000006e-17 < t < 3e114

   1. Initial program 90.0%

      \[\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in t around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \left(a \cdot \left(b \cdot z\right) + y \cdot z\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(a \cdot \left(b \cdot z\right) + y \cdot z\right) + x} \]

      2. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z + a \cdot \left(b \cdot z\right)\right)} + x \]

      3. associate-*r* N/A

         \[\leadsto \left(y \cdot z + \color{blue}{\left(a \cdot b\right) \cdot z}\right) + x \]

      4. distribute-rgt-in N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(y + a \cdot b\right)} + x \]

      5. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y + a \cdot b\right) \cdot z} + x \]

      6. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y + a \cdot b, z, x\right)} \]

      7. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{a \cdot b + y}, z, x\right) \]

      8. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{b \cdot a} + y, z, x\right) \]

      9. lower-fma.f64 89.8

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, y\right)}, z, x\right) \]

   5. Applied rewrites 89.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, y\right), z, x\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in a around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + y \cdot z} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot z + x} \]

      2. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot y} + x \]

      3. lower-fma.f64 61.5

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, y, x\right)} \]

   8. Applied rewrites 61.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, y, x\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 63.5%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;t \leq -3 \cdot 10^{-17} \lor \neg \left(t \leq 3 \cdot 10^{+114}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(a, t, x\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(z, y, x\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 8: 56.9% accurate, 1.6× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -3.25 \cdot 10^{+205} \lor \neg \left(y \leq 3 \cdot 10^{+193}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot y\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(a, t, x\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= y -3.25e+205) (not (<= y 3e+193))) (* z y) (fma a t x)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if ((y <= -3.25e+205) || !(y <= 3e+193)) {
		tmp = z * y;
	} else {
		tmp = fma(a, t, x);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((y <= -3.25e+205) || !(y <= 3e+193))
		tmp = Float64(z * y);
	else
		tmp = fma(a, t, x);
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := If[Or[LessEqual[y, -3.25e+205], N[Not[LessEqual[y, 3e+193]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(z * y), $MachinePrecision], N[(a * t + x), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if y < -3.24999999999999986e205 or 3e193 < y

   1. Initial program 85.2%

      \[\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in t around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \left(a \cdot \left(b \cdot z\right) + y \cdot z\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(a \cdot \left(b \cdot z\right) + y \cdot z\right) + x} \]

      2. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z + a \cdot \left(b \cdot z\right)\right)} + x \]

      3. associate-*r* N/A

         \[\leadsto \left(y \cdot z + \color{blue}{\left(a \cdot b\right) \cdot z}\right) + x \]

      4. distribute-rgt-in N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(y + a \cdot b\right)} + x \]

      5. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y + a \cdot b\right) \cdot z} + x \]

      6. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y + a \cdot b, z, x\right)} \]

      7. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{a \cdot b + y}, z, x\right) \]

      8. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{b \cdot a} + y, z, x\right) \]

      9. lower-fma.f64 89.4

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, y\right)}, z, x\right) \]

   5. Applied rewrites 89.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, y\right), z, x\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in y around inf

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot z} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot y} \]

      2. lower-*.f64 74.1

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot y} \]

   8. Applied rewrites 74.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot y} \]

   if -3.24999999999999986e205 < y < 3e193

   1. Initial program 92.1%

      \[\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in t around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \left(a \cdot \left(b \cdot z\right) + y \cdot z\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(a \cdot \left(b \cdot z\right) + y \cdot z\right) + x} \]

      2. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z + a \cdot \left(b \cdot z\right)\right)} + x \]

      3. associate-*r* N/A

         \[\leadsto \left(y \cdot z + \color{blue}{\left(a \cdot b\right) \cdot z}\right) + x \]

      4. distribute-rgt-in N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(y + a \cdot b\right)} + x \]

      5. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y + a \cdot b\right) \cdot z} + x \]

      6. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y + a \cdot b, z, x\right)} \]

      7. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{a \cdot b + y}, z, x\right) \]

      8. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{b \cdot a} + y, z, x\right) \]

      9. lower-fma.f64 72.9

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, y\right)}, z, x\right) \]

   5. Applied rewrites 72.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, y\right), z, x\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in z around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + a \cdot t} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot t + x} \]

      2. lower-fma.f64 54.3

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(a, t, x\right)} \]

   8. Applied rewrites 54.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(a, t, x\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 58.5%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -3.25 \cdot 10^{+205} \lor \neg \left(y \leq 3 \cdot 10^{+193}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot y\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(a, t, x\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 9: 38.4% accurate, 1.7× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;t \leq -3 \cdot 10^{-17} \lor \neg \left(t \leq 5 \cdot 10^{+116}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot t\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot y\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= t -3e-17) (not (<= t 5e+116))) (* a t) (* z y)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if ((t <= -3e-17) || !(t <= 5e+116)) {
		tmp = a * t;
	} else {
		tmp = z * y;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((t <= (-3d-17)) .or. (.not. (t <= 5d+116))) then
        tmp = a * t
    else
        tmp = z * y
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if ((t <= -3e-17) || !(t <= 5e+116)) {
		tmp = a * t;
	} else {
		tmp = z * y;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b):
	tmp = 0
	if (t <= -3e-17) or not (t <= 5e+116):
		tmp = a * t
	else:
		tmp = z * y
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((t <= -3e-17) || !(t <= 5e+116))
		tmp = Float64(a * t);
	else
		tmp = Float64(z * y);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((t <= -3e-17) || ~((t <= 5e+116)))
		tmp = a * t;
	else
		tmp = z * y;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := If[Or[LessEqual[t, -3e-17], N[Not[LessEqual[t, 5e+116]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(a * t), $MachinePrecision], N[(z * y), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if t < -3.00000000000000006e-17 or 5.00000000000000025e116 < t

   1. Initial program 91.6%

      \[\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in t around inf

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot t} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. lower-*.f64 54.0

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot t} \]

   5. Applied rewrites 54.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot t} \]

   if -3.00000000000000006e-17 < t < 5.00000000000000025e116

   1. Initial program 90.1%

      \[\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in t around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \left(a \cdot \left(b \cdot z\right) + y \cdot z\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(a \cdot \left(b \cdot z\right) + y \cdot z\right) + x} \]

      2. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z + a \cdot \left(b \cdot z\right)\right)} + x \]

      3. associate-*r* N/A

         \[\leadsto \left(y \cdot z + \color{blue}{\left(a \cdot b\right) \cdot z}\right) + x \]

      4. distribute-rgt-in N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(y + a \cdot b\right)} + x \]

      5. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y + a \cdot b\right) \cdot z} + x \]

      6. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y + a \cdot b, z, x\right)} \]

      7. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{a \cdot b + y}, z, x\right) \]

      8. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{b \cdot a} + y, z, x\right) \]

      9. lower-fma.f64 89.8

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, y\right)}, z, x\right) \]

   5. Applied rewrites 89.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, y\right), z, x\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in y around inf

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot z} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot y} \]

      2. lower-*.f64 34.6

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot y} \]

   8. Applied rewrites 34.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot y} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 41.8%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;t \leq -3 \cdot 10^{-17} \lor \neg \left(t \leq 5 \cdot 10^{+116}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot t\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot y\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 10: 27.9% accurate, 5.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ a \cdot t \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b) :precision binary64 (* a t))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	return a * t;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    code = a * t
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	return a * t;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b):
	return a * t

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	return Float64(a * t)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = a * t;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := N[(a * t), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 90.7%

   \[\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \]
2. Add Preprocessing

3. Taylor expanded in t around inf

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot t} \]
4. Step-by-step derivation

   1. lower-*.f64 25.7

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot t} \]

5. Applied rewrites 25.7%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot t} \]
6. Add Preprocessing

Developer Target 1: 97.2% accurate, 0.8× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_1 := z \cdot \left(b \cdot a + y\right) + \left(x + t \cdot a\right)\\ \mathbf{if}\;z < -11820553527347888000:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_1\\ \mathbf{elif}\;z < 4.7589743188364287 \cdot 10^{-122}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(b \cdot z + t\right) \cdot a + \left(z \cdot y + x\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_1\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_1 (+ (* z (+ (* b a) y)) (+ x (* t a)))))
   (if (< z -11820553527347888000.0)
     t_1
     (if (< z 4.7589743188364287e-122)
       (+ (* (+ (* b z) t) a) (+ (* z y) x))
       t_1))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double t_1 = (z * ((b * a) + y)) + (x + (t * a));
	double tmp;
	if (z < -11820553527347888000.0) {
		tmp = t_1;
	} else if (z < 4.7589743188364287e-122) {
		tmp = (((b * z) + t) * a) + ((z * y) + x);
	} else {
		tmp = t_1;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8) :: t_1
    real(8) :: tmp
    t_1 = (z * ((b * a) + y)) + (x + (t * a))
    if (z < (-11820553527347888000.0d0)) then
        tmp = t_1
    else if (z < 4.7589743188364287d-122) then
        tmp = (((b * z) + t) * a) + ((z * y) + x)
    else
        tmp = t_1
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double t_1 = (z * ((b * a) + y)) + (x + (t * a));
	double tmp;
	if (z < -11820553527347888000.0) {
		tmp = t_1;
	} else if (z < 4.7589743188364287e-122) {
		tmp = (((b * z) + t) * a) + ((z * y) + x);
	} else {
		tmp = t_1;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b):
	t_1 = (z * ((b * a) + y)) + (x + (t * a))
	tmp = 0
	if z < -11820553527347888000.0:
		tmp = t_1
	elif z < 4.7589743188364287e-122:
		tmp = (((b * z) + t) * a) + ((z * y) + x)
	else:
		tmp = t_1
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	t_1 = Float64(Float64(z * Float64(Float64(b * a) + y)) + Float64(x + Float64(t * a)))
	tmp = 0.0
	if (z < -11820553527347888000.0)
		tmp = t_1;
	elseif (z < 4.7589743188364287e-122)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(b * z) + t) * a) + Float64(Float64(z * y) + x));
	else
		tmp = t_1;
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	t_1 = (z * ((b * a) + y)) + (x + (t * a));
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (z < -11820553527347888000.0)
		tmp = t_1;
	elseif (z < 4.7589743188364287e-122)
		tmp = (((b * z) + t) * a) + ((z * y) + x);
	else
		tmp = t_1;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := Block[{t$95$1 = N[(N[(z * N[(N[(b * a), $MachinePrecision] + y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(x + N[(t * a), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, If[Less[z, -11820553527347888000.0], t$95$1, If[Less[z, 4.7589743188364287e-122], N[(N[(N[(N[(b * z), $MachinePrecision] + t), $MachinePrecision] * a), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(z * y), $MachinePrecision] + x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], t$95$1]]]

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2024339 
(FPCore (x y z t a b)
  :name "Graphics.Rasterific.CubicBezier:cachedBezierAt from Rasterific-0.6.1"
  :precision binary64

  :alt
  (! :herbie-platform default (if (< z -11820553527347888000) (+ (* z (+ (* b a) y)) (+ x (* t a))) (if (< z 47589743188364287/1000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000) (+ (* (+ (* b z) t) a) (+ (* z y) x)) (+ (* z (+ (* b a) y)) (+ x (* t a))))))

  (+ (+ (+ x (* y z)) (* t a)) (* (* a z) b)))