Language.Haskell.HsColour.ColourHighlight:unbase from hscolour-1.23

Percentage Accurate: 99.9% → 99.9%

Time: 5.6s

Alternatives: 6

Speedup: 1.3×

• 29.1% of points produce a very large (infinite) output. You may want to add a precondition.

Specification

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(x \cdot y + z\right) \cdot y + t \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t) :precision binary64 (+ (* (+ (* x y) z) y) t))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return (((x * y) + z) * y) + t;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = (((x * y) + z) * y) + t
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return (((x * y) + z) * y) + t;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return (((x * y) + z) * y) + t

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(x * y) + z) * y) + t)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = (((x * y) + z) * y) + t;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(N[(N[(N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision] + z), $MachinePrecision] * y), $MachinePrecision] + t), $MachinePrecision]

Initial Program: 99.9% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(x \cdot y + z\right) \cdot y + t \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t) :precision binary64 (+ (* (+ (* x y) z) y) t))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return (((x * y) + z) * y) + t;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = (((x * y) + z) * y) + t
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return (((x * y) + z) * y) + t;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return (((x * y) + z) * y) + t

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(x * y) + z) * y) + t)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = (((x * y) + z) * y) + t;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(N[(N[(N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision] + z), $MachinePrecision] * y), $MachinePrecision] + t), $MachinePrecision]

Alternative 1: 99.9% accurate, 1.3× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(y, x, z\right), y, t\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t) :precision binary64 (fma (fma y x z) y t))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return fma(fma(y, x, z), y, t);
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return fma(fma(y, x, z), y, t)
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(N[(y * x + z), $MachinePrecision] * y + t), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 100.0%

   \[\left(x \cdot y + z\right) \cdot y + t \]
2. Add Preprocessing
3. Step-by-step derivation

   1. lift-+.f64 N/A

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot y + z\right) \cdot y + t} \]

   2. lift-*.f64 N/A

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot y + z\right) \cdot y} + t \]

   3. lower-fma.f64 100.0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x \cdot y + z, y, t\right)} \]

   4. lift-+.f64 N/A

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{x \cdot y + z}, y, t\right) \]

   5. lift-*.f64 N/A

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{x \cdot y} + z, y, t\right) \]

   6. *-commutative N/A

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{y \cdot x} + z, y, t\right) \]

   7. lower-fma.f64 100.0

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, x, z\right)}, y, t\right) \]

4. Applied rewrites 100.0%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(y, x, z\right), y, t\right)} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 2: 87.6% accurate, 0.3× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_1 := \left(x \cdot y + z\right) \cdot y\\ \mathbf{if}\;t\_1 \leq -4 \cdot 10^{+283} \lor \neg \left(t\_1 \leq 10^{+38}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(y, x, z\right) \cdot y\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(z, y, t\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_1 (* (+ (* x y) z) y)))
   (if (or (<= t_1 -4e+283) (not (<= t_1 1e+38)))
     (* (fma y x z) y)
     (fma z y t))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double t_1 = ((x * y) + z) * y;
	double tmp;
	if ((t_1 <= -4e+283) || !(t_1 <= 1e+38)) {
		tmp = fma(y, x, z) * y;
	} else {
		tmp = fma(z, y, t);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	t_1 = Float64(Float64(Float64(x * y) + z) * y)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((t_1 <= -4e+283) || !(t_1 <= 1e+38))
		tmp = Float64(fma(y, x, z) * y);
	else
		tmp = fma(z, y, t);
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := Block[{t$95$1 = N[(N[(N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision] + z), $MachinePrecision] * y), $MachinePrecision]}, If[Or[LessEqual[t$95$1, -4e+283], N[Not[LessEqual[t$95$1, 1e+38]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(N[(y * x + z), $MachinePrecision] * y), $MachinePrecision], N[(z * y + t), $MachinePrecision]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (*.f64 (+.f64 (*.f64 x y) z) y) < -3.99999999999999982e283 or 9.99999999999999977e37 < (*.f64 (+.f64 (*.f64 x y) z) y)

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(x \cdot y + z\right) \cdot y + t \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in y around inf

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{{y}^{2} \cdot \left(x + \frac{z}{y}\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto {y}^{2} \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\frac{z}{y} + x\right)} \]

      2. distribute-lft-in N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{{y}^{2} \cdot \frac{z}{y} + {y}^{2} \cdot x} \]

   5. Applied rewrites 93.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, x, z\right) \cdot y} \]

   if -3.99999999999999982e283 < (*.f64 (+.f64 (*.f64 x y) z) y) < 9.99999999999999977e37

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[\left(x \cdot y + z\right) \cdot y + t \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{t + y \cdot z} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot z + t} \]

      2. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot y} + t \]

      3. lower-fma.f64 88.1

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, y, t\right)} \]

   5. Applied rewrites 88.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, y, t\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 90.2%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\left(x \cdot y + z\right) \cdot y \leq -4 \cdot 10^{+283} \lor \neg \left(\left(x \cdot y + z\right) \cdot y \leq 10^{+38}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(y, x, z\right) \cdot y\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(z, y, t\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 3: 79.4% accurate, 0.7× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -7.2 \cdot 10^{+126} \lor \neg \left(y \leq 1.15 \cdot 10^{+66}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;\left(x \cdot y\right) \cdot y\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(z, y, t\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= y -7.2e+126) (not (<= y 1.15e+66))) (* (* x y) y) (fma z y t)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if ((y <= -7.2e+126) || !(y <= 1.15e+66)) {
		tmp = (x * y) * y;
	} else {
		tmp = fma(z, y, t);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((y <= -7.2e+126) || !(y <= 1.15e+66))
		tmp = Float64(Float64(x * y) * y);
	else
		tmp = fma(z, y, t);
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := If[Or[LessEqual[y, -7.2e+126], N[Not[LessEqual[y, 1.15e+66]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision] * y), $MachinePrecision], N[(z * y + t), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if y < -7.2000000000000001e126 or 1.15e66 < y

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[\left(x \cdot y + z\right) \cdot y + t \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around inf

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot {y}^{2}} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{{y}^{2} \cdot x} \]

      2. lower-*.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{{y}^{2} \cdot x} \]

      3. unpow2 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot y\right)} \cdot x \]

      4. lower-*.f64 78.6

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot y\right)} \cdot x \]

   5. Applied rewrites 78.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot y\right) \cdot x} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

   7. Applied rewrites 79.5%

      \[\leadsto \left(x \cdot y\right) \cdot \color{blue}{y} \]

   if -7.2000000000000001e126 < y < 1.15e66

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(x \cdot y + z\right) \cdot y + t \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{t + y \cdot z} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot z + t} \]

      2. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot y} + t \]

      3. lower-fma.f64 86.1

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, y, t\right)} \]

   5. Applied rewrites 86.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, y, t\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 84.0%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -7.2 \cdot 10^{+126} \lor \neg \left(y \leq 1.15 \cdot 10^{+66}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;\left(x \cdot y\right) \cdot y\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(z, y, t\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 4: 78.8% accurate, 0.7× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -7.2 \cdot 10^{+126}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(y \cdot y\right) \cdot x\\ \mathbf{elif}\;y \leq 1.15 \cdot 10^{+66}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(z, y, t\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(x \cdot y\right) \cdot y\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= y -7.2e+126)
   (* (* y y) x)
   (if (<= y 1.15e+66) (fma z y t) (* (* x y) y))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= -7.2e+126) {
		tmp = (y * y) * x;
	} else if (y <= 1.15e+66) {
		tmp = fma(z, y, t);
	} else {
		tmp = (x * y) * y;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (y <= -7.2e+126)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(y * y) * x);
	elseif (y <= 1.15e+66)
		tmp = fma(z, y, t);
	else
		tmp = Float64(Float64(x * y) * y);
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := If[LessEqual[y, -7.2e+126], N[(N[(y * y), $MachinePrecision] * x), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[y, 1.15e+66], N[(z * y + t), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision] * y), $MachinePrecision]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if y < -7.2000000000000001e126

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[\left(x \cdot y + z\right) \cdot y + t \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around inf

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot {y}^{2}} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{{y}^{2} \cdot x} \]

      2. lower-*.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{{y}^{2} \cdot x} \]

      3. unpow2 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot y\right)} \cdot x \]

      4. lower-*.f64 79.5

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot y\right)} \cdot x \]

   5. Applied rewrites 79.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot y\right) \cdot x} \]

   if -7.2000000000000001e126 < y < 1.15e66

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(x \cdot y + z\right) \cdot y + t \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{t + y \cdot z} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot z + t} \]

      2. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot y} + t \]

      3. lower-fma.f64 86.1

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, y, t\right)} \]

   5. Applied rewrites 86.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, y, t\right)} \]

   if 1.15e66 < y

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(x \cdot y + z\right) \cdot y + t \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around inf

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot {y}^{2}} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{{y}^{2} \cdot x} \]

      2. lower-*.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{{y}^{2} \cdot x} \]

      3. unpow2 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot y\right)} \cdot x \]

      4. lower-*.f64 77.3

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot y\right)} \cdot x \]

   5. Applied rewrites 77.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot y\right) \cdot x} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

   7. Applied rewrites 80.0%

      \[\leadsto \left(x \cdot y\right) \cdot \color{blue}{y} \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.
4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 5: 66.4% accurate, 2.4× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \mathsf{fma}\left(z, y, t\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t) :precision binary64 (fma z y t))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return fma(z, y, t);
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return fma(z, y, t)
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(z * y + t), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 100.0%

   \[\left(x \cdot y + z\right) \cdot y + t \]
2. Add Preprocessing

3. Taylor expanded in x around 0

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{t + y \cdot z} \]
4. Step-by-step derivation

   1. +-commutative N/A

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot z + t} \]

   2. *-commutative N/A

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot y} + t \]

   3. lower-fma.f64 70.7

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, y, t\right)} \]

5. Applied rewrites 70.7%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, y, t\right)} \]
6. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 6: 29.8% accurate, 2.8× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ z \cdot y \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t) :precision binary64 (* z y))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return z * y;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = z * y
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return z * y;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return z * y

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(z * y)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = z * y;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(z * y), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 100.0%

   \[\left(x \cdot y + z\right) \cdot y + t \]
2. Add Preprocessing

3. Taylor expanded in y around inf

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{{y}^{2} \cdot \left(x + \frac{z}{y}\right)} \]
4. Step-by-step derivation

   1. +-commutative N/A

      \[\leadsto {y}^{2} \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\frac{z}{y} + x\right)} \]

   2. distribute-lft-in N/A

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{{y}^{2} \cdot \frac{z}{y} + {y}^{2} \cdot x} \]

5. Applied rewrites 60.6%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, x, z\right) \cdot y} \]

6. Taylor expanded in x around 0

   \[\leadsto y \cdot \color{blue}{z} \]
7. Step-by-step derivation

8. Applied rewrites 32.6%

   \[\leadsto z \cdot \color{blue}{y} \]
9. Add Preprocessing

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2024338 
(FPCore (x y z t)
  :name "Language.Haskell.HsColour.ColourHighlight:unbase from hscolour-1.23"
  :precision binary64
  (+ (* (+ (* x y) z) y) t))