Jmat.Real.lambertw, newton loop step

Percentage Accurate: 78.4% → 97.0%
Time: 8.9s
Alternatives: 6
Speedup: 55.2×

Specification

?
\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_0 := wj \cdot e^{wj}\\ wj - \frac{t\_0 - x}{e^{wj} + t\_0} \end{array} \end{array} \]
(FPCore (wj x)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_0 (* wj (exp wj)))) (- wj (/ (- t_0 x) (+ (exp wj) t_0)))))
double code(double wj, double x) {
	double t_0 = wj * exp(wj);
	return wj - ((t_0 - x) / (exp(wj) + t_0));
}
real(8) function code(wj, x)
    real(8), intent (in) :: wj
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8) :: t_0
    t_0 = wj * exp(wj)
    code = wj - ((t_0 - x) / (exp(wj) + t_0))
end function
public static double code(double wj, double x) {
	double t_0 = wj * Math.exp(wj);
	return wj - ((t_0 - x) / (Math.exp(wj) + t_0));
}
def code(wj, x):
	t_0 = wj * math.exp(wj)
	return wj - ((t_0 - x) / (math.exp(wj) + t_0))
function code(wj, x)
	t_0 = Float64(wj * exp(wj))
	return Float64(wj - Float64(Float64(t_0 - x) / Float64(exp(wj) + t_0)))
end
function tmp = code(wj, x)
	t_0 = wj * exp(wj);
	tmp = wj - ((t_0 - x) / (exp(wj) + t_0));
end
code[wj_, x_] := Block[{t$95$0 = N[(wj * N[Exp[wj], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, N[(wj - N[(N[(t$95$0 - x), $MachinePrecision] / N[(N[Exp[wj], $MachinePrecision] + t$95$0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\begin{array}{l}
t_0 := wj \cdot e^{wj}\\
wj - \frac{t\_0 - x}{e^{wj} + t\_0}
\end{array}
\end{array}

Sampling outcomes in binary64 precision:

Local Percentage Accuracy vs ?

The average percentage accuracy by input value. Horizontal axis shows value of an input variable; the variable is choosen in the title. Vertical axis is accuracy; higher is better. Red represent the original program, while blue represents Herbie's suggestion. These can be toggled with buttons below the plot. The line is an average while dots represent individual samples.

Accuracy vs Speed?

Herbie found 6 alternatives:

AlternativeAccuracySpeedup
The accuracy (vertical axis) and speed (horizontal axis) of each alternatives. Up and to the right is better. The red square shows the initial program, and each blue circle shows an alternative.The line shows the best available speed-accuracy tradeoffs.

Initial Program: 78.4% accurate, 1.0× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_0 := wj \cdot e^{wj}\\ wj - \frac{t\_0 - x}{e^{wj} + t\_0} \end{array} \end{array} \]
(FPCore (wj x)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_0 (* wj (exp wj)))) (- wj (/ (- t_0 x) (+ (exp wj) t_0)))))
double code(double wj, double x) {
	double t_0 = wj * exp(wj);
	return wj - ((t_0 - x) / (exp(wj) + t_0));
}
real(8) function code(wj, x)
    real(8), intent (in) :: wj
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8) :: t_0
    t_0 = wj * exp(wj)
    code = wj - ((t_0 - x) / (exp(wj) + t_0))
end function
public static double code(double wj, double x) {
	double t_0 = wj * Math.exp(wj);
	return wj - ((t_0 - x) / (Math.exp(wj) + t_0));
}
def code(wj, x):
	t_0 = wj * math.exp(wj)
	return wj - ((t_0 - x) / (math.exp(wj) + t_0))
function code(wj, x)
	t_0 = Float64(wj * exp(wj))
	return Float64(wj - Float64(Float64(t_0 - x) / Float64(exp(wj) + t_0)))
end
function tmp = code(wj, x)
	t_0 = wj * exp(wj);
	tmp = wj - ((t_0 - x) / (exp(wj) + t_0));
end
code[wj_, x_] := Block[{t$95$0 = N[(wj * N[Exp[wj], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, N[(wj - N[(N[(t$95$0 - x), $MachinePrecision] / N[(N[Exp[wj], $MachinePrecision] + t$95$0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\begin{array}{l}
t_0 := wj \cdot e^{wj}\\
wj - \frac{t\_0 - x}{e^{wj} + t\_0}
\end{array}
\end{array}

Alternative 1: 97.0% accurate, 0.7× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_0 := wj \cdot e^{wj}\\ \mathbf{if}\;wj - \frac{t\_0 - x}{e^{wj} + t\_0} \leq 10^{-14}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(-wj, \mathsf{fma}\left(0.6666666666666666, x, \mathsf{fma}\left(2, x, 1\right)\right), \mathsf{fma}\left(2.5, x, 1\right)\right), wj, -2 \cdot x\right), wj, x\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;wj - \frac{\frac{x}{1 + wj}}{-e^{wj}}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]
(FPCore (wj x)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_0 (* wj (exp wj))))
   (if (<= (- wj (/ (- t_0 x) (+ (exp wj) t_0))) 1e-14)
     (fma
      (fma
       (fma (- wj) (fma 0.6666666666666666 x (fma 2.0 x 1.0)) (fma 2.5 x 1.0))
       wj
       (* -2.0 x))
      wj
      x)
     (- wj (/ (/ x (+ 1.0 wj)) (- (exp wj)))))))
double code(double wj, double x) {
	double t_0 = wj * exp(wj);
	double tmp;
	if ((wj - ((t_0 - x) / (exp(wj) + t_0))) <= 1e-14) {
		tmp = fma(fma(fma(-wj, fma(0.6666666666666666, x, fma(2.0, x, 1.0)), fma(2.5, x, 1.0)), wj, (-2.0 * x)), wj, x);
	} else {
		tmp = wj - ((x / (1.0 + wj)) / -exp(wj));
	}
	return tmp;
}
function code(wj, x)
	t_0 = Float64(wj * exp(wj))
	tmp = 0.0
	if (Float64(wj - Float64(Float64(t_0 - x) / Float64(exp(wj) + t_0))) <= 1e-14)
		tmp = fma(fma(fma(Float64(-wj), fma(0.6666666666666666, x, fma(2.0, x, 1.0)), fma(2.5, x, 1.0)), wj, Float64(-2.0 * x)), wj, x);
	else
		tmp = Float64(wj - Float64(Float64(x / Float64(1.0 + wj)) / Float64(-exp(wj))));
	end
	return tmp
end
code[wj_, x_] := Block[{t$95$0 = N[(wj * N[Exp[wj], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[N[(wj - N[(N[(t$95$0 - x), $MachinePrecision] / N[(N[Exp[wj], $MachinePrecision] + t$95$0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], 1e-14], N[(N[(N[((-wj) * N[(0.6666666666666666 * x + N[(2.0 * x + 1.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(2.5 * x + 1.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] * wj + N[(-2.0 * x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] * wj + x), $MachinePrecision], N[(wj - N[(N[(x / N[(1.0 + wj), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / (-N[Exp[wj], $MachinePrecision])), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]]
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\begin{array}{l}
t_0 := wj \cdot e^{wj}\\
\mathbf{if}\;wj - \frac{t\_0 - x}{e^{wj} + t\_0} \leq 10^{-14}:\\
\;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(-wj, \mathsf{fma}\left(0.6666666666666666, x, \mathsf{fma}\left(2, x, 1\right)\right), \mathsf{fma}\left(2.5, x, 1\right)\right), wj, -2 \cdot x\right), wj, x\right)\\

\mathbf{else}:\\
\;\;\;\;wj - \frac{\frac{x}{1 + wj}}{-e^{wj}}\\


\end{array}
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Split input into 2 regimes
  2. if (-.f64 wj (/.f64 (-.f64 (*.f64 wj (exp.f64 wj)) x) (+.f64 (exp.f64 wj) (*.f64 wj (exp.f64 wj))))) < 9.99999999999999999e-15

    1. Initial program 74.8%

      \[wj - \frac{wj \cdot e^{wj} - x}{e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}} \]
    2. Add Preprocessing
    3. Taylor expanded in wj around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + wj \cdot \left(wj \cdot \left(\left(1 + -1 \cdot \left(wj \cdot \left(1 + \left(-3 \cdot x + \left(-2 \cdot \left(-4 \cdot x + \frac{3}{2} \cdot x\right) + \frac{2}{3} \cdot x\right)\right)\right)\right)\right) - \left(-4 \cdot x + \frac{3}{2} \cdot x\right)\right) - 2 \cdot x\right)} \]
    4. Applied rewrites99.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(-wj, \mathsf{fma}\left(0.6666666666666666, x, \mathsf{fma}\left(2, x, 1\right)\right), \mathsf{fma}\left(2.5, x, 1\right)\right), wj, -2 \cdot x\right), wj, x\right)} \]

    if 9.99999999999999999e-15 < (-.f64 wj (/.f64 (-.f64 (*.f64 wj (exp.f64 wj)) x) (+.f64 (exp.f64 wj) (*.f64 wj (exp.f64 wj)))))

    1. Initial program 93.5%

      \[wj - \frac{wj \cdot e^{wj} - x}{e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}} \]
    2. Add Preprocessing
    3. Taylor expanded in x around inf

      \[\leadsto wj - \color{blue}{-1 \cdot \frac{x}{e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}}} \]
    4. Step-by-step derivation
      1. mul-1-negN/A

        \[\leadsto wj - \color{blue}{\left(\mathsf{neg}\left(\frac{x}{e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}}\right)\right)} \]
      2. distribute-rgt1-inN/A

        \[\leadsto wj - \left(\mathsf{neg}\left(\frac{x}{\color{blue}{\left(wj + 1\right) \cdot e^{wj}}}\right)\right) \]
      3. +-commutativeN/A

        \[\leadsto wj - \left(\mathsf{neg}\left(\frac{x}{\color{blue}{\left(1 + wj\right)} \cdot e^{wj}}\right)\right) \]
      4. associate-/r*N/A

        \[\leadsto wj - \left(\mathsf{neg}\left(\color{blue}{\frac{\frac{x}{1 + wj}}{e^{wj}}}\right)\right) \]
      5. distribute-neg-frac2N/A

        \[\leadsto wj - \color{blue}{\frac{\frac{x}{1 + wj}}{\mathsf{neg}\left(e^{wj}\right)}} \]
      6. mul-1-negN/A

        \[\leadsto wj - \frac{\frac{x}{1 + wj}}{\color{blue}{-1 \cdot e^{wj}}} \]
      7. lower-/.f64N/A

        \[\leadsto wj - \color{blue}{\frac{\frac{x}{1 + wj}}{-1 \cdot e^{wj}}} \]
      8. lower-/.f64N/A

        \[\leadsto wj - \frac{\color{blue}{\frac{x}{1 + wj}}}{-1 \cdot e^{wj}} \]
      9. lower-+.f64N/A

        \[\leadsto wj - \frac{\frac{x}{\color{blue}{1 + wj}}}{-1 \cdot e^{wj}} \]
      10. mul-1-negN/A

        \[\leadsto wj - \frac{\frac{x}{1 + wj}}{\color{blue}{\mathsf{neg}\left(e^{wj}\right)}} \]
      11. lower-neg.f64N/A

        \[\leadsto wj - \frac{\frac{x}{1 + wj}}{\color{blue}{-e^{wj}}} \]
      12. lower-exp.f6497.9

        \[\leadsto wj - \frac{\frac{x}{1 + wj}}{-\color{blue}{e^{wj}}} \]
    5. Applied rewrites97.9%

      \[\leadsto wj - \color{blue}{\frac{\frac{x}{1 + wj}}{-e^{wj}}} \]
  3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
  4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 2: 96.2% accurate, 7.5× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(-wj, \mathsf{fma}\left(0.6666666666666666, x, \mathsf{fma}\left(2, x, 1\right)\right), \mathsf{fma}\left(2.5, x, 1\right)\right), wj, -2 \cdot x\right), wj, x\right) \end{array} \]
(FPCore (wj x)
 :precision binary64
 (fma
  (fma
   (fma (- wj) (fma 0.6666666666666666 x (fma 2.0 x 1.0)) (fma 2.5 x 1.0))
   wj
   (* -2.0 x))
  wj
  x))
double code(double wj, double x) {
	return fma(fma(fma(-wj, fma(0.6666666666666666, x, fma(2.0, x, 1.0)), fma(2.5, x, 1.0)), wj, (-2.0 * x)), wj, x);
}
function code(wj, x)
	return fma(fma(fma(Float64(-wj), fma(0.6666666666666666, x, fma(2.0, x, 1.0)), fma(2.5, x, 1.0)), wj, Float64(-2.0 * x)), wj, x)
end
code[wj_, x_] := N[(N[(N[((-wj) * N[(0.6666666666666666 * x + N[(2.0 * x + 1.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(2.5 * x + 1.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] * wj + N[(-2.0 * x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] * wj + x), $MachinePrecision]
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(-wj, \mathsf{fma}\left(0.6666666666666666, x, \mathsf{fma}\left(2, x, 1\right)\right), \mathsf{fma}\left(2.5, x, 1\right)\right), wj, -2 \cdot x\right), wj, x\right)
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Initial program 79.4%

    \[wj - \frac{wj \cdot e^{wj} - x}{e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}} \]
  2. Add Preprocessing
  3. Taylor expanded in wj around 0

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + wj \cdot \left(wj \cdot \left(\left(1 + -1 \cdot \left(wj \cdot \left(1 + \left(-3 \cdot x + \left(-2 \cdot \left(-4 \cdot x + \frac{3}{2} \cdot x\right) + \frac{2}{3} \cdot x\right)\right)\right)\right)\right) - \left(-4 \cdot x + \frac{3}{2} \cdot x\right)\right) - 2 \cdot x\right)} \]
  4. Applied rewrites97.0%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(-wj, \mathsf{fma}\left(0.6666666666666666, x, \mathsf{fma}\left(2, x, 1\right)\right), \mathsf{fma}\left(2.5, x, 1\right)\right), wj, -2 \cdot x\right), wj, x\right)} \]
  5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 3: 96.0% accurate, 15.8× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(1 - wj, wj, -2 \cdot x\right), wj, x\right) \end{array} \]
(FPCore (wj x) :precision binary64 (fma (fma (- 1.0 wj) wj (* -2.0 x)) wj x))
double code(double wj, double x) {
	return fma(fma((1.0 - wj), wj, (-2.0 * x)), wj, x);
}
function code(wj, x)
	return fma(fma(Float64(1.0 - wj), wj, Float64(-2.0 * x)), wj, x)
end
code[wj_, x_] := N[(N[(N[(1.0 - wj), $MachinePrecision] * wj + N[(-2.0 * x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] * wj + x), $MachinePrecision]
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(1 - wj, wj, -2 \cdot x\right), wj, x\right)
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Initial program 79.4%

    \[wj - \frac{wj \cdot e^{wj} - x}{e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}} \]
  2. Add Preprocessing
  3. Taylor expanded in wj around 0

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + wj \cdot \left(wj \cdot \left(\left(1 + -1 \cdot \left(wj \cdot \left(1 + \left(-3 \cdot x + \left(-2 \cdot \left(-4 \cdot x + \frac{3}{2} \cdot x\right) + \frac{2}{3} \cdot x\right)\right)\right)\right)\right) - \left(-4 \cdot x + \frac{3}{2} \cdot x\right)\right) - 2 \cdot x\right)} \]
  4. Applied rewrites97.0%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(-wj, \mathsf{fma}\left(0.6666666666666666, x, \mathsf{fma}\left(2, x, 1\right)\right), \mathsf{fma}\left(2.5, x, 1\right)\right), wj, -2 \cdot x\right), wj, x\right)} \]
  5. Taylor expanded in x around 0

    \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(1 + -1 \cdot wj, wj, -2 \cdot x\right), wj, x\right) \]
  6. Step-by-step derivation
    1. Applied rewrites96.8%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(1 - wj, wj, -2 \cdot x\right), wj, x\right) \]
    2. Add Preprocessing

    Alternative 4: 85.2% accurate, 27.6× speedup?

    \[\begin{array}{l} \\ \mathsf{fma}\left(-2, wj, 1\right) \cdot x \end{array} \]
    (FPCore (wj x) :precision binary64 (* (fma -2.0 wj 1.0) x))
    double code(double wj, double x) {
    	return fma(-2.0, wj, 1.0) * x;
    }
    
    function code(wj, x)
    	return Float64(fma(-2.0, wj, 1.0) * x)
    end
    
    code[wj_, x_] := N[(N[(-2.0 * wj + 1.0), $MachinePrecision] * x), $MachinePrecision]
    
    \begin{array}{l}
    
    \\
    \mathsf{fma}\left(-2, wj, 1\right) \cdot x
    \end{array}
    
    Derivation
    1. Initial program 79.4%

      \[wj - \frac{wj \cdot e^{wj} - x}{e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}} \]
    2. Add Preprocessing
    3. Taylor expanded in wj around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + -2 \cdot \left(wj \cdot x\right)} \]
    4. Step-by-step derivation
      1. associate-*r*N/A

        \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(-2 \cdot wj\right) \cdot x} \]
      2. metadata-evalN/A

        \[\leadsto x + \left(\color{blue}{\left(\mathsf{neg}\left(2\right)\right)} \cdot wj\right) \cdot x \]
      3. distribute-rgt1-inN/A

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(\mathsf{neg}\left(2\right)\right) \cdot wj + 1\right) \cdot x} \]
      4. lower-*.f64N/A

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(\mathsf{neg}\left(2\right)\right) \cdot wj + 1\right) \cdot x} \]
      5. metadata-evalN/A

        \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{-2} \cdot wj + 1\right) \cdot x \]
      6. lower-fma.f6484.5

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(-2, wj, 1\right)} \cdot x \]
    5. Applied rewrites84.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(-2, wj, 1\right) \cdot x} \]
    6. Add Preprocessing

    Alternative 5: 84.7% accurate, 55.2× speedup?

    \[\begin{array}{l} \\ 1 \cdot x \end{array} \]
    (FPCore (wj x) :precision binary64 (* 1.0 x))
    double code(double wj, double x) {
    	return 1.0 * x;
    }
    
    real(8) function code(wj, x)
        real(8), intent (in) :: wj
        real(8), intent (in) :: x
        code = 1.0d0 * x
    end function
    
    public static double code(double wj, double x) {
    	return 1.0 * x;
    }
    
    def code(wj, x):
    	return 1.0 * x
    
    function code(wj, x)
    	return Float64(1.0 * x)
    end
    
    function tmp = code(wj, x)
    	tmp = 1.0 * x;
    end
    
    code[wj_, x_] := N[(1.0 * x), $MachinePrecision]
    
    \begin{array}{l}
    
    \\
    1 \cdot x
    \end{array}
    
    Derivation
    1. Initial program 79.4%

      \[wj - \frac{wj \cdot e^{wj} - x}{e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}} \]
    2. Add Preprocessing
    3. Taylor expanded in wj around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + -2 \cdot \left(wj \cdot x\right)} \]
    4. Step-by-step derivation
      1. associate-*r*N/A

        \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(-2 \cdot wj\right) \cdot x} \]
      2. metadata-evalN/A

        \[\leadsto x + \left(\color{blue}{\left(\mathsf{neg}\left(2\right)\right)} \cdot wj\right) \cdot x \]
      3. distribute-rgt1-inN/A

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(\mathsf{neg}\left(2\right)\right) \cdot wj + 1\right) \cdot x} \]
      4. lower-*.f64N/A

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(\mathsf{neg}\left(2\right)\right) \cdot wj + 1\right) \cdot x} \]
      5. metadata-evalN/A

        \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{-2} \cdot wj + 1\right) \cdot x \]
      6. lower-fma.f6484.5

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(-2, wj, 1\right)} \cdot x \]
    5. Applied rewrites84.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(-2, wj, 1\right) \cdot x} \]
    6. Taylor expanded in wj around 0

      \[\leadsto 1 \cdot x \]
    7. Step-by-step derivation
      1. Applied rewrites84.2%

        \[\leadsto 1 \cdot x \]
      2. Add Preprocessing

      Alternative 6: 13.3% accurate, 55.2× speedup?

      \[\begin{array}{l} \\ wj \cdot wj \end{array} \]
      (FPCore (wj x) :precision binary64 (* wj wj))
      double code(double wj, double x) {
      	return wj * wj;
      }
      
      real(8) function code(wj, x)
          real(8), intent (in) :: wj
          real(8), intent (in) :: x
          code = wj * wj
      end function
      
      public static double code(double wj, double x) {
      	return wj * wj;
      }
      
      def code(wj, x):
      	return wj * wj
      
      function code(wj, x)
      	return Float64(wj * wj)
      end
      
      function tmp = code(wj, x)
      	tmp = wj * wj;
      end
      
      code[wj_, x_] := N[(wj * wj), $MachinePrecision]
      
      \begin{array}{l}
      
      \\
      wj \cdot wj
      \end{array}
      
      Derivation
      1. Initial program 79.4%

        \[wj - \frac{wj \cdot e^{wj} - x}{e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}} \]
      2. Add Preprocessing
      3. Taylor expanded in wj around 0

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + wj \cdot \left(wj \cdot \left(\left(1 + -1 \cdot \left(wj \cdot \left(1 + \left(-3 \cdot x + \left(-2 \cdot \left(-4 \cdot x + \frac{3}{2} \cdot x\right) + \frac{2}{3} \cdot x\right)\right)\right)\right)\right) - \left(-4 \cdot x + \frac{3}{2} \cdot x\right)\right) - 2 \cdot x\right)} \]
      4. Applied rewrites97.0%

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(-wj, \mathsf{fma}\left(0.6666666666666666, x, \mathsf{fma}\left(2, x, 1\right)\right), \mathsf{fma}\left(2.5, x, 1\right)\right), wj, -2 \cdot x\right), wj, x\right)} \]
      5. Taylor expanded in x around 0

        \[\leadsto {wj}^{2} \cdot \color{blue}{\left(1 + -1 \cdot wj\right)} \]
      6. Step-by-step derivation
        1. Applied rewrites13.5%

          \[\leadsto \left(\left(1 - wj\right) \cdot wj\right) \cdot \color{blue}{wj} \]
        2. Taylor expanded in wj around 0

          \[\leadsto {wj}^{2} \]
        3. Step-by-step derivation
          1. Applied rewrites13.1%

            \[\leadsto wj \cdot wj \]
          2. Add Preprocessing

          Developer Target 1: 79.3% accurate, 1.4× speedup?

          \[\begin{array}{l} \\ wj - \left(\frac{wj}{wj + 1} - \frac{x}{e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}}\right) \end{array} \]
          (FPCore (wj x)
           :precision binary64
           (- wj (- (/ wj (+ wj 1.0)) (/ x (+ (exp wj) (* wj (exp wj)))))))
          double code(double wj, double x) {
          	return wj - ((wj / (wj + 1.0)) - (x / (exp(wj) + (wj * exp(wj)))));
          }
          
          real(8) function code(wj, x)
              real(8), intent (in) :: wj
              real(8), intent (in) :: x
              code = wj - ((wj / (wj + 1.0d0)) - (x / (exp(wj) + (wj * exp(wj)))))
          end function
          
          public static double code(double wj, double x) {
          	return wj - ((wj / (wj + 1.0)) - (x / (Math.exp(wj) + (wj * Math.exp(wj)))));
          }
          
          def code(wj, x):
          	return wj - ((wj / (wj + 1.0)) - (x / (math.exp(wj) + (wj * math.exp(wj)))))
          
          function code(wj, x)
          	return Float64(wj - Float64(Float64(wj / Float64(wj + 1.0)) - Float64(x / Float64(exp(wj) + Float64(wj * exp(wj))))))
          end
          
          function tmp = code(wj, x)
          	tmp = wj - ((wj / (wj + 1.0)) - (x / (exp(wj) + (wj * exp(wj)))));
          end
          
          code[wj_, x_] := N[(wj - N[(N[(wj / N[(wj + 1.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - N[(x / N[(N[Exp[wj], $MachinePrecision] + N[(wj * N[Exp[wj], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]
          
          \begin{array}{l}
          
          \\
          wj - \left(\frac{wj}{wj + 1} - \frac{x}{e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}}\right)
          \end{array}
          

          Reproduce

          ?
          herbie shell --seed 2024337 
          (FPCore (wj x)
            :name "Jmat.Real.lambertw, newton loop step"
            :precision binary64
          
            :alt
            (! :herbie-platform default (let ((ew (exp wj))) (- wj (- (/ wj (+ wj 1)) (/ x (+ ew (* wj ew)))))))
          
            (- wj (/ (- (* wj (exp wj)) x) (+ (exp wj) (* wj (exp wj))))))