Maksimov and Kolovsky, Equation (32)

Percentage Accurate: 76.0% → 96.5%

Time: 6.3s

Alternatives: 7

Speedup: 1.6×

Specification

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \cos \left(\frac{K \cdot \left(m + n\right)}{2} - M\right) \cdot e^{\left(-{\left(\frac{m + n}{2} - M\right)}^{2}\right) - \left(\ell - \left|m - n\right|\right)} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (K m n M l)
 :precision binary64
 (*
  (cos (- (/ (* K (+ m n)) 2.0) M))
  (exp (- (- (pow (- (/ (+ m n) 2.0) M) 2.0)) (- l (fabs (- m n)))))))

C

double code(double K, double m, double n, double M, double l) {
	return cos((((K * (m + n)) / 2.0) - M)) * exp((-pow((((m + n) / 2.0) - M), 2.0) - (l - fabs((m - n)))));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(k, m, n, m_1, l)
    real(8), intent (in) :: k
    real(8), intent (in) :: m
    real(8), intent (in) :: n
    real(8), intent (in) :: m_1
    real(8), intent (in) :: l
    code = cos((((k * (m + n)) / 2.0d0) - m_1)) * exp((-((((m + n) / 2.0d0) - m_1) ** 2.0d0) - (l - abs((m - n)))))
end function

Java

public static double code(double K, double m, double n, double M, double l) {
	return Math.cos((((K * (m + n)) / 2.0) - M)) * Math.exp((-Math.pow((((m + n) / 2.0) - M), 2.0) - (l - Math.abs((m - n)))));
}

Python

def code(K, m, n, M, l):
	return math.cos((((K * (m + n)) / 2.0) - M)) * math.exp((-math.pow((((m + n) / 2.0) - M), 2.0) - (l - math.fabs((m - n)))))

Julia

function code(K, m, n, M, l)
	return Float64(cos(Float64(Float64(Float64(K * Float64(m + n)) / 2.0) - M)) * exp(Float64(Float64(-(Float64(Float64(Float64(m + n) / 2.0) - M) ^ 2.0)) - Float64(l - abs(Float64(m - n))))))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(K, m, n, M, l)
	tmp = cos((((K * (m + n)) / 2.0) - M)) * exp((-((((m + n) / 2.0) - M) ^ 2.0) - (l - abs((m - n)))));
end

Wolfram

code[K_, m_, n_, M_, l_] := N[(N[Cos[N[(N[(N[(K * N[(m + n), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / 2.0), $MachinePrecision] - M), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] * N[Exp[N[((-N[Power[N[(N[(N[(m + n), $MachinePrecision] / 2.0), $MachinePrecision] - M), $MachinePrecision], 2.0], $MachinePrecision]) - N[(l - N[Abs[N[(m - n), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Initial Program: 76.0% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \cos \left(\frac{K \cdot \left(m + n\right)}{2} - M\right) \cdot e^{\left(-{\left(\frac{m + n}{2} - M\right)}^{2}\right) - \left(\ell - \left|m - n\right|\right)} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (K m n M l)
 :precision binary64
 (*
  (cos (- (/ (* K (+ m n)) 2.0) M))
  (exp (- (- (pow (- (/ (+ m n) 2.0) M) 2.0)) (- l (fabs (- m n)))))))

C

double code(double K, double m, double n, double M, double l) {
	return cos((((K * (m + n)) / 2.0) - M)) * exp((-pow((((m + n) / 2.0) - M), 2.0) - (l - fabs((m - n)))));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(k, m, n, m_1, l)
    real(8), intent (in) :: k
    real(8), intent (in) :: m
    real(8), intent (in) :: n
    real(8), intent (in) :: m_1
    real(8), intent (in) :: l
    code = cos((((k * (m + n)) / 2.0d0) - m_1)) * exp((-((((m + n) / 2.0d0) - m_1) ** 2.0d0) - (l - abs((m - n)))))
end function

Java

public static double code(double K, double m, double n, double M, double l) {
	return Math.cos((((K * (m + n)) / 2.0) - M)) * Math.exp((-Math.pow((((m + n) / 2.0) - M), 2.0) - (l - Math.abs((m - n)))));
}

Python

def code(K, m, n, M, l):
	return math.cos((((K * (m + n)) / 2.0) - M)) * math.exp((-math.pow((((m + n) / 2.0) - M), 2.0) - (l - math.fabs((m - n)))))

Julia

function code(K, m, n, M, l)
	return Float64(cos(Float64(Float64(Float64(K * Float64(m + n)) / 2.0) - M)) * exp(Float64(Float64(-(Float64(Float64(Float64(m + n) / 2.0) - M) ^ 2.0)) - Float64(l - abs(Float64(m - n))))))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(K, m, n, M, l)
	tmp = cos((((K * (m + n)) / 2.0) - M)) * exp((-((((m + n) / 2.0) - M) ^ 2.0) - (l - abs((m - n)))));
end

Wolfram

code[K_, m_, n_, M_, l_] := N[(N[Cos[N[(N[(N[(K * N[(m + n), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / 2.0), $MachinePrecision] - M), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] * N[Exp[N[((-N[Power[N[(N[(N[(m + n), $MachinePrecision] / 2.0), $MachinePrecision] - M), $MachinePrecision], 2.0], $MachinePrecision]) - N[(l - N[Abs[N[(m - n), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Alternative 1: 96.5% accurate, 1.1× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ e^{\left|n - m\right| - \left({\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(n + m, 0.5, -M\right)\right)}^{2} + \ell\right)} \cdot \cos M \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (K m n M l)
 :precision binary64
 (* (exp (- (fabs (- n m)) (+ (pow (fma (+ n m) 0.5 (- M)) 2.0) l))) (cos M)))

C

double code(double K, double m, double n, double M, double l) {
	return exp((fabs((n - m)) - (pow(fma((n + m), 0.5, -M), 2.0) + l))) * cos(M);
}

Julia

function code(K, m, n, M, l)
	return Float64(exp(Float64(abs(Float64(n - m)) - Float64((fma(Float64(n + m), 0.5, Float64(-M)) ^ 2.0) + l))) * cos(M))
end

Wolfram

code[K_, m_, n_, M_, l_] := N[(N[Exp[N[(N[Abs[N[(n - m), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] - N[(N[Power[N[(N[(n + m), $MachinePrecision] * 0.5 + (-M)), $MachinePrecision], 2.0], $MachinePrecision] + l), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] * N[Cos[M], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 78.7%

   \[\cos \left(\frac{K \cdot \left(m + n\right)}{2} - M\right) \cdot e^{\left(-{\left(\frac{m + n}{2} - M\right)}^{2}\right) - \left(\ell - \left|m - n\right|\right)} \]
2. Add Preprocessing

3. Taylor expanded in K around 0

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\cos \left(\mathsf{neg}\left(M\right)\right) \cdot e^{\left|m - n\right| - \left(\ell + {\left(\frac{1}{2} \cdot \left(m + n\right) - M\right)}^{2}\right)}} \]
4. Step-by-step derivation

   1. *-commutative N/A

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{e^{\left|m - n\right| - \left(\ell + {\left(\frac{1}{2} \cdot \left(m + n\right) - M\right)}^{2}\right)} \cdot \cos \left(\mathsf{neg}\left(M\right)\right)} \]

   2. lower-*.f64 N/A

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{e^{\left|m - n\right| - \left(\ell + {\left(\frac{1}{2} \cdot \left(m + n\right) - M\right)}^{2}\right)} \cdot \cos \left(\mathsf{neg}\left(M\right)\right)} \]

5. Applied rewrites 98.5%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{e^{\left|m - n\right| - \left({\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(n + m, 0.5, -M\right)\right)}^{2} + \ell\right)} \cdot \cos M} \]

6. Final simplification 98.5%

   \[\leadsto e^{\left|n - m\right| - \left({\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(n + m, 0.5, -M\right)\right)}^{2} + \ell\right)} \cdot \cos M \]
7. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 2: 94.5% accurate, 1.6× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;M \leq -2.6 \cdot 10^{+28} \lor \neg \left(M \leq 7.6 \cdot 10^{+86}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;e^{\left(-M\right) \cdot M} \cdot 1\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;e^{\left|n - m\right| - \mathsf{fma}\left(0.25, {\left(n + m\right)}^{2}, \ell\right)}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (K m n M l)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= M -2.6e+28) (not (<= M 7.6e+86)))
   (* (exp (* (- M) M)) 1.0)
   (exp (- (fabs (- n m)) (fma 0.25 (pow (+ n m) 2.0) l)))))

C

double code(double K, double m, double n, double M, double l) {
	double tmp;
	if ((M <= -2.6e+28) || !(M <= 7.6e+86)) {
		tmp = exp((-M * M)) * 1.0;
	} else {
		tmp = exp((fabs((n - m)) - fma(0.25, pow((n + m), 2.0), l)));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Julia

function code(K, m, n, M, l)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((M <= -2.6e+28) || !(M <= 7.6e+86))
		tmp = Float64(exp(Float64(Float64(-M) * M)) * 1.0);
	else
		tmp = exp(Float64(abs(Float64(n - m)) - fma(0.25, (Float64(n + m) ^ 2.0), l)));
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

code[K_, m_, n_, M_, l_] := If[Or[LessEqual[M, -2.6e+28], N[Not[LessEqual[M, 7.6e+86]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(N[Exp[N[((-M) * M), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] * 1.0), $MachinePrecision], N[Exp[N[(N[Abs[N[(n - m), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] - N[(0.25 * N[Power[N[(n + m), $MachinePrecision], 2.0], $MachinePrecision] + l), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if M < -2.6000000000000002e28 or 7.59999999999999956e86 < M

   1. Initial program 77.5%

      \[\cos \left(\frac{K \cdot \left(m + n\right)}{2} - M\right) \cdot e^{\left(-{\left(\frac{m + n}{2} - M\right)}^{2}\right) - \left(\ell - \left|m - n\right|\right)} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in K around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\cos \left(\mathsf{neg}\left(M\right)\right) \cdot e^{\left|m - n\right| - \left(\ell + {\left(\frac{1}{2} \cdot \left(m + n\right) - M\right)}^{2}\right)}} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{e^{\left|m - n\right| - \left(\ell + {\left(\frac{1}{2} \cdot \left(m + n\right) - M\right)}^{2}\right)} \cdot \cos \left(\mathsf{neg}\left(M\right)\right)} \]

      2. lower-*.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{e^{\left|m - n\right| - \left(\ell + {\left(\frac{1}{2} \cdot \left(m + n\right) - M\right)}^{2}\right)} \cdot \cos \left(\mathsf{neg}\left(M\right)\right)} \]

   5. Applied rewrites 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{e^{\left|m - n\right| - \left({\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(n + m, 0.5, -M\right)\right)}^{2} + \ell\right)} \cdot \cos M} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in M around inf

      \[\leadsto e^{-1 \cdot {M}^{2}} \cdot \cos M \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

   8. Applied rewrites 99.0%

      \[\leadsto e^{\left(-M\right) \cdot M} \cdot \cos M \]

   9. Taylor expanded in M around 0

      \[\leadsto e^{\left(-M\right) \cdot M} \cdot 1 \]
   10. Step-by-step derivation

   11. Applied rewrites 99.0%

       \[\leadsto e^{\left(-M\right) \cdot M} \cdot 1 \]

   if -2.6000000000000002e28 < M < 7.59999999999999956e86

   1. Initial program 79.5%

      \[\cos \left(\frac{K \cdot \left(m + n\right)}{2} - M\right) \cdot e^{\left(-{\left(\frac{m + n}{2} - M\right)}^{2}\right) - \left(\ell - \left|m - n\right|\right)} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in K around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\cos \left(\mathsf{neg}\left(M\right)\right) \cdot e^{\left|m - n\right| - \left(\ell + {\left(\frac{1}{2} \cdot \left(m + n\right) - M\right)}^{2}\right)}} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{e^{\left|m - n\right| - \left(\ell + {\left(\frac{1}{2} \cdot \left(m + n\right) - M\right)}^{2}\right)} \cdot \cos \left(\mathsf{neg}\left(M\right)\right)} \]

      2. lower-*.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{e^{\left|m - n\right| - \left(\ell + {\left(\frac{1}{2} \cdot \left(m + n\right) - M\right)}^{2}\right)} \cdot \cos \left(\mathsf{neg}\left(M\right)\right)} \]

   5. Applied rewrites 97.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{e^{\left|m - n\right| - \left({\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(n + m, 0.5, -M\right)\right)}^{2} + \ell\right)} \cdot \cos M} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in M around 0

      \[\leadsto e^{\left|m - n\right| - \left(\ell + \frac{1}{4} \cdot {\left(m + n\right)}^{2}\right)} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

   8. Applied rewrites 96.3%

      \[\leadsto e^{\left|n - m\right| - \mathsf{fma}\left(0.25, {\left(n + m\right)}^{2}, \ell\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 97.4%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;M \leq -2.6 \cdot 10^{+28} \lor \neg \left(M \leq 7.6 \cdot 10^{+86}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;e^{\left(-M\right) \cdot M} \cdot 1\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;e^{\left|n - m\right| - \mathsf{fma}\left(0.25, {\left(n + m\right)}^{2}, \ell\right)}\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 3: 73.6% accurate, 2.8× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;m \leq -54:\\ \;\;\;\;e^{\left(m \cdot m\right) \cdot -0.25}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;e^{\left|n - m\right| - \mathsf{fma}\left(0.25, n \cdot n, \ell\right)}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (K m n M l)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= m -54.0)
   (exp (* (* m m) -0.25))
   (exp (- (fabs (- n m)) (fma 0.25 (* n n) l)))))

C

double code(double K, double m, double n, double M, double l) {
	double tmp;
	if (m <= -54.0) {
		tmp = exp(((m * m) * -0.25));
	} else {
		tmp = exp((fabs((n - m)) - fma(0.25, (n * n), l)));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Julia

function code(K, m, n, M, l)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (m <= -54.0)
		tmp = exp(Float64(Float64(m * m) * -0.25));
	else
		tmp = exp(Float64(abs(Float64(n - m)) - fma(0.25, Float64(n * n), l)));
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

code[K_, m_, n_, M_, l_] := If[LessEqual[m, -54.0], N[Exp[N[(N[(m * m), $MachinePrecision] * -0.25), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision], N[Exp[N[(N[Abs[N[(n - m), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] - N[(0.25 * N[(n * n), $MachinePrecision] + l), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if m < -54

   1. Initial program 75.8%

      \[\cos \left(\frac{K \cdot \left(m + n\right)}{2} - M\right) \cdot e^{\left(-{\left(\frac{m + n}{2} - M\right)}^{2}\right) - \left(\ell - \left|m - n\right|\right)} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in K around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\cos \left(\mathsf{neg}\left(M\right)\right) \cdot e^{\left|m - n\right| - \left(\ell + {\left(\frac{1}{2} \cdot \left(m + n\right) - M\right)}^{2}\right)}} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{e^{\left|m - n\right| - \left(\ell + {\left(\frac{1}{2} \cdot \left(m + n\right) - M\right)}^{2}\right)} \cdot \cos \left(\mathsf{neg}\left(M\right)\right)} \]

      2. lower-*.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{e^{\left|m - n\right| - \left(\ell + {\left(\frac{1}{2} \cdot \left(m + n\right) - M\right)}^{2}\right)} \cdot \cos \left(\mathsf{neg}\left(M\right)\right)} \]

   5. Applied rewrites 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{e^{\left|m - n\right| - \left({\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(n + m, 0.5, -M\right)\right)}^{2} + \ell\right)} \cdot \cos M} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in M around 0

      \[\leadsto e^{\left|m - n\right| - \left(\ell + \frac{1}{4} \cdot {\left(m + n\right)}^{2}\right)} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

   8. Applied rewrites 100.0%

      \[\leadsto e^{\left|n - m\right| - \mathsf{fma}\left(0.25, {\left(n + m\right)}^{2}, \ell\right)} \]

   9. Taylor expanded in m around inf

      \[\leadsto e^{\frac{-1}{4} \cdot {m}^{2}} \]
   10. Step-by-step derivation

   11. Applied rewrites 97.0%

       \[\leadsto e^{\left(m \cdot m\right) \cdot -0.25} \]

   if -54 < m

   1. Initial program 79.7%

      \[\cos \left(\frac{K \cdot \left(m + n\right)}{2} - M\right) \cdot e^{\left(-{\left(\frac{m + n}{2} - M\right)}^{2}\right) - \left(\ell - \left|m - n\right|\right)} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in K around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\cos \left(\mathsf{neg}\left(M\right)\right) \cdot e^{\left|m - n\right| - \left(\ell + {\left(\frac{1}{2} \cdot \left(m + n\right) - M\right)}^{2}\right)}} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{e^{\left|m - n\right| - \left(\ell + {\left(\frac{1}{2} \cdot \left(m + n\right) - M\right)}^{2}\right)} \cdot \cos \left(\mathsf{neg}\left(M\right)\right)} \]

      2. lower-*.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{e^{\left|m - n\right| - \left(\ell + {\left(\frac{1}{2} \cdot \left(m + n\right) - M\right)}^{2}\right)} \cdot \cos \left(\mathsf{neg}\left(M\right)\right)} \]

   5. Applied rewrites 97.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{e^{\left|m - n\right| - \left({\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(n + m, 0.5, -M\right)\right)}^{2} + \ell\right)} \cdot \cos M} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in M around 0

      \[\leadsto e^{\left|m - n\right| - \left(\ell + \frac{1}{4} \cdot {\left(m + n\right)}^{2}\right)} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

   8. Applied rewrites 85.7%

      \[\leadsto e^{\left|n - m\right| - \mathsf{fma}\left(0.25, {\left(n + m\right)}^{2}, \ell\right)} \]

   9. Taylor expanded in m around 0

      \[\leadsto e^{\left|n - m\right| - \mathsf{fma}\left(\frac{1}{4}, {n}^{2}, \ell\right)} \]
   10. Step-by-step derivation

   11. Applied rewrites 70.7%

       \[\leadsto e^{\left|n - m\right| - \mathsf{fma}\left(0.25, n \cdot n, \ell\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 4: 64.2% accurate, 2.9× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;m \leq -0.00041:\\ \;\;\;\;e^{\left(m \cdot m\right) \cdot -0.25}\\ \mathbf{elif}\;m \leq 2 \cdot 10^{-269}:\\ \;\;\;\;e^{\left(-M\right) \cdot M} \cdot 1\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;e^{\left(n \cdot n\right) \cdot -0.25}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (K m n M l)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= m -0.00041)
   (exp (* (* m m) -0.25))
   (if (<= m 2e-269) (* (exp (* (- M) M)) 1.0) (exp (* (* n n) -0.25)))))

C

double code(double K, double m, double n, double M, double l) {
	double tmp;
	if (m <= -0.00041) {
		tmp = exp(((m * m) * -0.25));
	} else if (m <= 2e-269) {
		tmp = exp((-M * M)) * 1.0;
	} else {
		tmp = exp(((n * n) * -0.25));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(k, m, n, m_1, l)
    real(8), intent (in) :: k
    real(8), intent (in) :: m
    real(8), intent (in) :: n
    real(8), intent (in) :: m_1
    real(8), intent (in) :: l
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (m <= (-0.00041d0)) then
        tmp = exp(((m * m) * (-0.25d0)))
    else if (m <= 2d-269) then
        tmp = exp((-m_1 * m_1)) * 1.0d0
    else
        tmp = exp(((n * n) * (-0.25d0)))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double K, double m, double n, double M, double l) {
	double tmp;
	if (m <= -0.00041) {
		tmp = Math.exp(((m * m) * -0.25));
	} else if (m <= 2e-269) {
		tmp = Math.exp((-M * M)) * 1.0;
	} else {
		tmp = Math.exp(((n * n) * -0.25));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(K, m, n, M, l):
	tmp = 0
	if m <= -0.00041:
		tmp = math.exp(((m * m) * -0.25))
	elif m <= 2e-269:
		tmp = math.exp((-M * M)) * 1.0
	else:
		tmp = math.exp(((n * n) * -0.25))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(K, m, n, M, l)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (m <= -0.00041)
		tmp = exp(Float64(Float64(m * m) * -0.25));
	elseif (m <= 2e-269)
		tmp = Float64(exp(Float64(Float64(-M) * M)) * 1.0);
	else
		tmp = exp(Float64(Float64(n * n) * -0.25));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(K, m, n, M, l)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (m <= -0.00041)
		tmp = exp(((m * m) * -0.25));
	elseif (m <= 2e-269)
		tmp = exp((-M * M)) * 1.0;
	else
		tmp = exp(((n * n) * -0.25));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[K_, m_, n_, M_, l_] := If[LessEqual[m, -0.00041], N[Exp[N[(N[(m * m), $MachinePrecision] * -0.25), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[m, 2e-269], N[(N[Exp[N[((-M) * M), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] * 1.0), $MachinePrecision], N[Exp[N[(N[(n * n), $MachinePrecision] * -0.25), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if m < -4.0999999999999999e-4

   1. Initial program 76.1%

      \[\cos \left(\frac{K \cdot \left(m + n\right)}{2} - M\right) \cdot e^{\left(-{\left(\frac{m + n}{2} - M\right)}^{2}\right) - \left(\ell - \left|m - n\right|\right)} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in K around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\cos \left(\mathsf{neg}\left(M\right)\right) \cdot e^{\left|m - n\right| - \left(\ell + {\left(\frac{1}{2} \cdot \left(m + n\right) - M\right)}^{2}\right)}} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{e^{\left|m - n\right| - \left(\ell + {\left(\frac{1}{2} \cdot \left(m + n\right) - M\right)}^{2}\right)} \cdot \cos \left(\mathsf{neg}\left(M\right)\right)} \]

      2. lower-*.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{e^{\left|m - n\right| - \left(\ell + {\left(\frac{1}{2} \cdot \left(m + n\right) - M\right)}^{2}\right)} \cdot \cos \left(\mathsf{neg}\left(M\right)\right)} \]

   5. Applied rewrites 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{e^{\left|m - n\right| - \left({\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(n + m, 0.5, -M\right)\right)}^{2} + \ell\right)} \cdot \cos M} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in M around 0

      \[\leadsto e^{\left|m - n\right| - \left(\ell + \frac{1}{4} \cdot {\left(m + n\right)}^{2}\right)} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

   8. Applied rewrites 100.0%

      \[\leadsto e^{\left|n - m\right| - \mathsf{fma}\left(0.25, {\left(n + m\right)}^{2}, \ell\right)} \]

   9. Taylor expanded in m around inf

      \[\leadsto e^{\frac{-1}{4} \cdot {m}^{2}} \]
   10. Step-by-step derivation

   11. Applied rewrites 95.6%

       \[\leadsto e^{\left(m \cdot m\right) \cdot -0.25} \]

   if -4.0999999999999999e-4 < m < 1.9999999999999999e-269

   1. Initial program 84.5%

      \[\cos \left(\frac{K \cdot \left(m + n\right)}{2} - M\right) \cdot e^{\left(-{\left(\frac{m + n}{2} - M\right)}^{2}\right) - \left(\ell - \left|m - n\right|\right)} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in K around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\cos \left(\mathsf{neg}\left(M\right)\right) \cdot e^{\left|m - n\right| - \left(\ell + {\left(\frac{1}{2} \cdot \left(m + n\right) - M\right)}^{2}\right)}} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{e^{\left|m - n\right| - \left(\ell + {\left(\frac{1}{2} \cdot \left(m + n\right) - M\right)}^{2}\right)} \cdot \cos \left(\mathsf{neg}\left(M\right)\right)} \]

      2. lower-*.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{e^{\left|m - n\right| - \left(\ell + {\left(\frac{1}{2} \cdot \left(m + n\right) - M\right)}^{2}\right)} \cdot \cos \left(\mathsf{neg}\left(M\right)\right)} \]

   5. Applied rewrites 95.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{e^{\left|m - n\right| - \left({\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(n + m, 0.5, -M\right)\right)}^{2} + \ell\right)} \cdot \cos M} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in M around inf

      \[\leadsto e^{-1 \cdot {M}^{2}} \cdot \cos M \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

   8. Applied rewrites 55.4%

      \[\leadsto e^{\left(-M\right) \cdot M} \cdot \cos M \]

   9. Taylor expanded in M around 0

      \[\leadsto e^{\left(-M\right) \cdot M} \cdot 1 \]
   10. Step-by-step derivation

   11. Applied rewrites 55.4%

       \[\leadsto e^{\left(-M\right) \cdot M} \cdot 1 \]

   if 1.9999999999999999e-269 < m

   1. Initial program 76.8%

      \[\cos \left(\frac{K \cdot \left(m + n\right)}{2} - M\right) \cdot e^{\left(-{\left(\frac{m + n}{2} - M\right)}^{2}\right) - \left(\ell - \left|m - n\right|\right)} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in K around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\cos \left(\mathsf{neg}\left(M\right)\right) \cdot e^{\left|m - n\right| - \left(\ell + {\left(\frac{1}{2} \cdot \left(m + n\right) - M\right)}^{2}\right)}} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{e^{\left|m - n\right| - \left(\ell + {\left(\frac{1}{2} \cdot \left(m + n\right) - M\right)}^{2}\right)} \cdot \cos \left(\mathsf{neg}\left(M\right)\right)} \]

      2. lower-*.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{e^{\left|m - n\right| - \left(\ell + {\left(\frac{1}{2} \cdot \left(m + n\right) - M\right)}^{2}\right)} \cdot \cos \left(\mathsf{neg}\left(M\right)\right)} \]

   5. Applied rewrites 99.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{e^{\left|m - n\right| - \left({\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(n + m, 0.5, -M\right)\right)}^{2} + \ell\right)} \cdot \cos M} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in M around 0

      \[\leadsto e^{\left|m - n\right| - \left(\ell + \frac{1}{4} \cdot {\left(m + n\right)}^{2}\right)} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

   8. Applied rewrites 90.4%

      \[\leadsto e^{\left|n - m\right| - \mathsf{fma}\left(0.25, {\left(n + m\right)}^{2}, \ell\right)} \]

   9. Taylor expanded in n around inf

      \[\leadsto e^{\frac{-1}{4} \cdot {n}^{2}} \]
   10. Step-by-step derivation

   11. Applied rewrites 57.4%

       \[\leadsto e^{\left(n \cdot n\right) \cdot -0.25} \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.
4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 5: 69.8% accurate, 2.9× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;m \leq -52 \lor \neg \left(m \leq 54\right):\\ \;\;\;\;e^{\left(m \cdot m\right) \cdot -0.25}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;e^{-\ell}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (K m n M l)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= m -52.0) (not (<= m 54.0))) (exp (* (* m m) -0.25)) (exp (- l))))

C

double code(double K, double m, double n, double M, double l) {
	double tmp;
	if ((m <= -52.0) || !(m <= 54.0)) {
		tmp = exp(((m * m) * -0.25));
	} else {
		tmp = exp(-l);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(k, m, n, m_1, l)
    real(8), intent (in) :: k
    real(8), intent (in) :: m
    real(8), intent (in) :: n
    real(8), intent (in) :: m_1
    real(8), intent (in) :: l
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((m <= (-52.0d0)) .or. (.not. (m <= 54.0d0))) then
        tmp = exp(((m * m) * (-0.25d0)))
    else
        tmp = exp(-l)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double K, double m, double n, double M, double l) {
	double tmp;
	if ((m <= -52.0) || !(m <= 54.0)) {
		tmp = Math.exp(((m * m) * -0.25));
	} else {
		tmp = Math.exp(-l);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(K, m, n, M, l):
	tmp = 0
	if (m <= -52.0) or not (m <= 54.0):
		tmp = math.exp(((m * m) * -0.25))
	else:
		tmp = math.exp(-l)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(K, m, n, M, l)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((m <= -52.0) || !(m <= 54.0))
		tmp = exp(Float64(Float64(m * m) * -0.25));
	else
		tmp = exp(Float64(-l));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(K, m, n, M, l)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((m <= -52.0) || ~((m <= 54.0)))
		tmp = exp(((m * m) * -0.25));
	else
		tmp = exp(-l);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[K_, m_, n_, M_, l_] := If[Or[LessEqual[m, -52.0], N[Not[LessEqual[m, 54.0]], $MachinePrecision]], N[Exp[N[(N[(m * m), $MachinePrecision] * -0.25), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision], N[Exp[(-l)], $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if m < -52 or 54 < m

   1. Initial program 74.6%

      \[\cos \left(\frac{K \cdot \left(m + n\right)}{2} - M\right) \cdot e^{\left(-{\left(\frac{m + n}{2} - M\right)}^{2}\right) - \left(\ell - \left|m - n\right|\right)} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in K around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\cos \left(\mathsf{neg}\left(M\right)\right) \cdot e^{\left|m - n\right| - \left(\ell + {\left(\frac{1}{2} \cdot \left(m + n\right) - M\right)}^{2}\right)}} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{e^{\left|m - n\right| - \left(\ell + {\left(\frac{1}{2} \cdot \left(m + n\right) - M\right)}^{2}\right)} \cdot \cos \left(\mathsf{neg}\left(M\right)\right)} \]

      2. lower-*.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{e^{\left|m - n\right| - \left(\ell + {\left(\frac{1}{2} \cdot \left(m + n\right) - M\right)}^{2}\right)} \cdot \cos \left(\mathsf{neg}\left(M\right)\right)} \]

   5. Applied rewrites 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{e^{\left|m - n\right| - \left({\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(n + m, 0.5, -M\right)\right)}^{2} + \ell\right)} \cdot \cos M} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in M around 0

      \[\leadsto e^{\left|m - n\right| - \left(\ell + \frac{1}{4} \cdot {\left(m + n\right)}^{2}\right)} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

   8. Applied rewrites 97.7%

      \[\leadsto e^{\left|n - m\right| - \mathsf{fma}\left(0.25, {\left(n + m\right)}^{2}, \ell\right)} \]

   9. Taylor expanded in m around inf

      \[\leadsto e^{\frac{-1}{4} \cdot {m}^{2}} \]
   10. Step-by-step derivation

   11. Applied rewrites 97.7%

       \[\leadsto e^{\left(m \cdot m\right) \cdot -0.25} \]

   if -52 < m < 54

   1. Initial program 82.9%

      \[\cos \left(\frac{K \cdot \left(m + n\right)}{2} - M\right) \cdot e^{\left(-{\left(\frac{m + n}{2} - M\right)}^{2}\right) - \left(\ell - \left|m - n\right|\right)} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in K around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\cos \left(\mathsf{neg}\left(M\right)\right) \cdot e^{\left|m - n\right| - \left(\ell + {\left(\frac{1}{2} \cdot \left(m + n\right) - M\right)}^{2}\right)}} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{e^{\left|m - n\right| - \left(\ell + {\left(\frac{1}{2} \cdot \left(m + n\right) - M\right)}^{2}\right)} \cdot \cos \left(\mathsf{neg}\left(M\right)\right)} \]

      2. lower-*.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{e^{\left|m - n\right| - \left(\ell + {\left(\frac{1}{2} \cdot \left(m + n\right) - M\right)}^{2}\right)} \cdot \cos \left(\mathsf{neg}\left(M\right)\right)} \]

   5. Applied rewrites 96.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{e^{\left|m - n\right| - \left({\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(n + m, 0.5, -M\right)\right)}^{2} + \ell\right)} \cdot \cos M} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in M around 0

      \[\leadsto e^{\left|m - n\right| - \left(\ell + \frac{1}{4} \cdot {\left(m + n\right)}^{2}\right)} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

   8. Applied rewrites 80.8%

      \[\leadsto e^{\left|n - m\right| - \mathsf{fma}\left(0.25, {\left(n + m\right)}^{2}, \ell\right)} \]

   9. Taylor expanded in l around inf

      \[\leadsto e^{-1 \cdot \ell} \]
   10. Step-by-step derivation

   11. Applied rewrites 40.9%

       \[\leadsto e^{-\ell} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 69.8%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;m \leq -52 \lor \neg \left(m \leq 54\right):\\ \;\;\;\;e^{\left(m \cdot m\right) \cdot -0.25}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;e^{-\ell}\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 6: 65.6% accurate, 3.1× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;n \leq 54:\\ \;\;\;\;e^{\left(m \cdot m\right) \cdot -0.25}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;e^{\left(n \cdot n\right) \cdot -0.25}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (K m n M l)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= n 54.0) (exp (* (* m m) -0.25)) (exp (* (* n n) -0.25))))

C

double code(double K, double m, double n, double M, double l) {
	double tmp;
	if (n <= 54.0) {
		tmp = exp(((m * m) * -0.25));
	} else {
		tmp = exp(((n * n) * -0.25));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(k, m, n, m_1, l)
    real(8), intent (in) :: k
    real(8), intent (in) :: m
    real(8), intent (in) :: n
    real(8), intent (in) :: m_1
    real(8), intent (in) :: l
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (n <= 54.0d0) then
        tmp = exp(((m * m) * (-0.25d0)))
    else
        tmp = exp(((n * n) * (-0.25d0)))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double K, double m, double n, double M, double l) {
	double tmp;
	if (n <= 54.0) {
		tmp = Math.exp(((m * m) * -0.25));
	} else {
		tmp = Math.exp(((n * n) * -0.25));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(K, m, n, M, l):
	tmp = 0
	if n <= 54.0:
		tmp = math.exp(((m * m) * -0.25))
	else:
		tmp = math.exp(((n * n) * -0.25))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(K, m, n, M, l)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (n <= 54.0)
		tmp = exp(Float64(Float64(m * m) * -0.25));
	else
		tmp = exp(Float64(Float64(n * n) * -0.25));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(K, m, n, M, l)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (n <= 54.0)
		tmp = exp(((m * m) * -0.25));
	else
		tmp = exp(((n * n) * -0.25));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[K_, m_, n_, M_, l_] := If[LessEqual[n, 54.0], N[Exp[N[(N[(m * m), $MachinePrecision] * -0.25), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision], N[Exp[N[(N[(n * n), $MachinePrecision] * -0.25), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if n < 54

   1. Initial program 80.1%

      \[\cos \left(\frac{K \cdot \left(m + n\right)}{2} - M\right) \cdot e^{\left(-{\left(\frac{m + n}{2} - M\right)}^{2}\right) - \left(\ell - \left|m - n\right|\right)} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in K around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\cos \left(\mathsf{neg}\left(M\right)\right) \cdot e^{\left|m - n\right| - \left(\ell + {\left(\frac{1}{2} \cdot \left(m + n\right) - M\right)}^{2}\right)}} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{e^{\left|m - n\right| - \left(\ell + {\left(\frac{1}{2} \cdot \left(m + n\right) - M\right)}^{2}\right)} \cdot \cos \left(\mathsf{neg}\left(M\right)\right)} \]

      2. lower-*.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{e^{\left|m - n\right| - \left(\ell + {\left(\frac{1}{2} \cdot \left(m + n\right) - M\right)}^{2}\right)} \cdot \cos \left(\mathsf{neg}\left(M\right)\right)} \]

   5. Applied rewrites 97.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{e^{\left|m - n\right| - \left({\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(n + m, 0.5, -M\right)\right)}^{2} + \ell\right)} \cdot \cos M} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in M around 0

      \[\leadsto e^{\left|m - n\right| - \left(\ell + \frac{1}{4} \cdot {\left(m + n\right)}^{2}\right)} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

   8. Applied rewrites 87.2%

      \[\leadsto e^{\left|n - m\right| - \mathsf{fma}\left(0.25, {\left(n + m\right)}^{2}, \ell\right)} \]

   9. Taylor expanded in m around inf

      \[\leadsto e^{\frac{-1}{4} \cdot {m}^{2}} \]
   10. Step-by-step derivation

   11. Applied rewrites 55.6%

       \[\leadsto e^{\left(m \cdot m\right) \cdot -0.25} \]

   if 54 < n

   1. Initial program 74.6%

      \[\cos \left(\frac{K \cdot \left(m + n\right)}{2} - M\right) \cdot e^{\left(-{\left(\frac{m + n}{2} - M\right)}^{2}\right) - \left(\ell - \left|m - n\right|\right)} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in K around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\cos \left(\mathsf{neg}\left(M\right)\right) \cdot e^{\left|m - n\right| - \left(\ell + {\left(\frac{1}{2} \cdot \left(m + n\right) - M\right)}^{2}\right)}} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{e^{\left|m - n\right| - \left(\ell + {\left(\frac{1}{2} \cdot \left(m + n\right) - M\right)}^{2}\right)} \cdot \cos \left(\mathsf{neg}\left(M\right)\right)} \]

      2. lower-*.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{e^{\left|m - n\right| - \left(\ell + {\left(\frac{1}{2} \cdot \left(m + n\right) - M\right)}^{2}\right)} \cdot \cos \left(\mathsf{neg}\left(M\right)\right)} \]

   5. Applied rewrites 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{e^{\left|m - n\right| - \left({\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(n + m, 0.5, -M\right)\right)}^{2} + \ell\right)} \cdot \cos M} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in M around 0

      \[\leadsto e^{\left|m - n\right| - \left(\ell + \frac{1}{4} \cdot {\left(m + n\right)}^{2}\right)} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

   8. Applied rewrites 95.6%

      \[\leadsto e^{\left|n - m\right| - \mathsf{fma}\left(0.25, {\left(n + m\right)}^{2}, \ell\right)} \]

   9. Taylor expanded in n around inf

      \[\leadsto e^{\frac{-1}{4} \cdot {n}^{2}} \]
   10. Step-by-step derivation

   11. Applied rewrites 95.6%

       \[\leadsto e^{\left(n \cdot n\right) \cdot -0.25} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 7: 36.1% accurate, 3.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ e^{-\ell} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (K m n M l) :precision binary64 (exp (- l)))

C

double code(double K, double m, double n, double M, double l) {
	return exp(-l);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(k, m, n, m_1, l)
    real(8), intent (in) :: k
    real(8), intent (in) :: m
    real(8), intent (in) :: n
    real(8), intent (in) :: m_1
    real(8), intent (in) :: l
    code = exp(-l)
end function

Java

public static double code(double K, double m, double n, double M, double l) {
	return Math.exp(-l);
}

Python

def code(K, m, n, M, l):
	return math.exp(-l)

Julia

function code(K, m, n, M, l)
	return exp(Float64(-l))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(K, m, n, M, l)
	tmp = exp(-l);
end

Wolfram

code[K_, m_, n_, M_, l_] := N[Exp[(-l)], $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 78.7%

   \[\cos \left(\frac{K \cdot \left(m + n\right)}{2} - M\right) \cdot e^{\left(-{\left(\frac{m + n}{2} - M\right)}^{2}\right) - \left(\ell - \left|m - n\right|\right)} \]
2. Add Preprocessing

3. Taylor expanded in K around 0

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\cos \left(\mathsf{neg}\left(M\right)\right) \cdot e^{\left|m - n\right| - \left(\ell + {\left(\frac{1}{2} \cdot \left(m + n\right) - M\right)}^{2}\right)}} \]
4. Step-by-step derivation

   1. *-commutative N/A

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{e^{\left|m - n\right| - \left(\ell + {\left(\frac{1}{2} \cdot \left(m + n\right) - M\right)}^{2}\right)} \cdot \cos \left(\mathsf{neg}\left(M\right)\right)} \]

   2. lower-*.f64 N/A

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{e^{\left|m - n\right| - \left(\ell + {\left(\frac{1}{2} \cdot \left(m + n\right) - M\right)}^{2}\right)} \cdot \cos \left(\mathsf{neg}\left(M\right)\right)} \]

5. Applied rewrites 98.5%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{e^{\left|m - n\right| - \left({\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(n + m, 0.5, -M\right)\right)}^{2} + \ell\right)} \cdot \cos M} \]

6. Taylor expanded in M around 0

   \[\leadsto e^{\left|m - n\right| - \left(\ell + \frac{1}{4} \cdot {\left(m + n\right)}^{2}\right)} \]
7. Step-by-step derivation

8. Applied rewrites 89.4%

   \[\leadsto e^{\left|n - m\right| - \mathsf{fma}\left(0.25, {\left(n + m\right)}^{2}, \ell\right)} \]

9. Taylor expanded in l around inf

   \[\leadsto e^{-1 \cdot \ell} \]
10. Step-by-step derivation

11. Applied rewrites 36.0%

    \[\leadsto e^{-\ell} \]
12. Add Preprocessing

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2024332 
(FPCore (K m n M l)
  :name "Maksimov and Kolovsky, Equation (32)"
  :precision binary64
  (* (cos (- (/ (* K (+ m n)) 2.0) M)) (exp (- (- (pow (- (/ (+ m n) 2.0) M) 2.0)) (- l (fabs (- m n)))))))