SynthBasics:moogVCF from YampaSynth-0.2

Percentage Accurate: 93.2% → 97.6%

Time: 6.6s

Alternatives: 8

Speedup: 1.0×

Specification

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (+ x (* (* y z) (- (tanh (/ t y)) (tanh (/ x y))))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x + ((y * z) * (tanh((t / y)) - tanh((x / y))));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = x + ((y * z) * (tanh((t / y)) - tanh((x / y))))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x + ((y * z) * (Math.tanh((t / y)) - Math.tanh((x / y))));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return x + ((y * z) * (math.tanh((t / y)) - math.tanh((x / y))))

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(x + Float64(Float64(y * z) * Float64(tanh(Float64(t / y)) - tanh(Float64(x / y)))))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = x + ((y * z) * (tanh((t / y)) - tanh((x / y))));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(x + N[(N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision] * N[(N[Tanh[N[(t / y), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] - N[Tanh[N[(x / y), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Initial Program: 93.2% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (+ x (* (* y z) (- (tanh (/ t y)) (tanh (/ x y))))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x + ((y * z) * (tanh((t / y)) - tanh((x / y))));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = x + ((y * z) * (tanh((t / y)) - tanh((x / y))))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x + ((y * z) * (Math.tanh((t / y)) - Math.tanh((x / y))));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return x + ((y * z) * (math.tanh((t / y)) - math.tanh((x / y))))

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(x + Float64(Float64(y * z) * Float64(tanh(Float64(t / y)) - tanh(Float64(x / y)))))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = x + ((y * z) * (tanh((t / y)) - tanh((x / y))));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(x + N[(N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision] * N[(N[Tanh[N[(t / y), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] - N[Tanh[N[(x / y), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Alternative 1: 97.6% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \mathsf{fma}\left(\left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \cdot y, z, x\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (fma (* (- (tanh (/ t y)) (tanh (/ x y))) y) z x))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return fma(((tanh((t / y)) - tanh((x / y))) * y), z, x);
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return fma(Float64(Float64(tanh(Float64(t / y)) - tanh(Float64(x / y))) * y), z, x)
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(N[(N[(N[Tanh[N[(t / y), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] - N[Tanh[N[(x / y), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] * y), $MachinePrecision] * z + x), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 94.4%

   \[x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \]
2. Add Preprocessing
3. Step-by-step derivation

   1. lift-+.f64 N/A

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right)} \]

   2. +-commutative N/A

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) + x} \]

   3. lift-*.f64 N/A

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right)} + x \]

   4. *-commutative N/A

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)} + x \]

   5. lift-*.f64 N/A

      \[\leadsto \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z\right)} + x \]

   6. associate-*r* N/A

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \cdot y\right) \cdot z} + x \]

   7. lower-fma.f64 N/A

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \cdot y, z, x\right)} \]

   8. lower-*.f64 98.8

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{\left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \cdot y}, z, x\right) \]

4. Applied rewrites 98.8%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \cdot y, z, x\right)} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 2: 65.5% accurate, 0.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_1 := x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{if}\;t\_1 \leq -1 \cdot 10^{+295} \lor \neg \left(t\_1 \leq 2 \cdot 10^{+306}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;\left(-z\right) \cdot x\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;1 \cdot x\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_1 (+ x (* (* y z) (- (tanh (/ t y)) (tanh (/ x y)))))))
   (if (or (<= t_1 -1e+295) (not (<= t_1 2e+306))) (* (- z) x) (* 1.0 x))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double t_1 = x + ((y * z) * (tanh((t / y)) - tanh((x / y))));
	double tmp;
	if ((t_1 <= -1e+295) || !(t_1 <= 2e+306)) {
		tmp = -z * x;
	} else {
		tmp = 1.0 * x;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: t_1
    real(8) :: tmp
    t_1 = x + ((y * z) * (tanh((t / y)) - tanh((x / y))))
    if ((t_1 <= (-1d+295)) .or. (.not. (t_1 <= 2d+306))) then
        tmp = -z * x
    else
        tmp = 1.0d0 * x
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double t_1 = x + ((y * z) * (Math.tanh((t / y)) - Math.tanh((x / y))));
	double tmp;
	if ((t_1 <= -1e+295) || !(t_1 <= 2e+306)) {
		tmp = -z * x;
	} else {
		tmp = 1.0 * x;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	t_1 = x + ((y * z) * (math.tanh((t / y)) - math.tanh((x / y))))
	tmp = 0
	if (t_1 <= -1e+295) or not (t_1 <= 2e+306):
		tmp = -z * x
	else:
		tmp = 1.0 * x
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	t_1 = Float64(x + Float64(Float64(y * z) * Float64(tanh(Float64(t / y)) - tanh(Float64(x / y)))))
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((t_1 <= -1e+295) || !(t_1 <= 2e+306))
		tmp = Float64(Float64(-z) * x);
	else
		tmp = Float64(1.0 * x);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t)
	t_1 = x + ((y * z) * (tanh((t / y)) - tanh((x / y))));
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((t_1 <= -1e+295) || ~((t_1 <= 2e+306)))
		tmp = -z * x;
	else
		tmp = 1.0 * x;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := Block[{t$95$1 = N[(x + N[(N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision] * N[(N[Tanh[N[(t / y), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] - N[Tanh[N[(x / y), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, If[Or[LessEqual[t$95$1, -1e+295], N[Not[LessEqual[t$95$1, 2e+306]], $MachinePrecision]], N[((-z) * x), $MachinePrecision], N[(1.0 * x), $MachinePrecision]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (+.f64 x (*.f64 (*.f64 y z) (-.f64 (tanh.f64 (/.f64 t y)) (tanh.f64 (/.f64 x y))))) < -9.9999999999999998e294 or 2.00000000000000003e306 < (+.f64 x (*.f64 (*.f64 y z) (-.f64 (tanh.f64 (/.f64 t y)) (tanh.f64 (/.f64 x y)))))

   1. Initial program 57.5%

      \[x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in y around inf

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + z \cdot \left(t - x\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(t - x\right) + x} \]

      2. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(t - x\right) \cdot z} + x \]

      3. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(t - x, z, x\right)} \]

      4. lower--.f64 97.1

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{t - x}, z, x\right) \]

   5. Applied rewrites 97.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(t - x, z, x\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in x around inf

      \[\leadsto x \cdot \color{blue}{\left(1 + -1 \cdot z\right)} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

   8. Applied rewrites 59.4%

      \[\leadsto \left(1 - z\right) \cdot \color{blue}{x} \]

   9. Taylor expanded in z around inf

      \[\leadsto \left(-1 \cdot z\right) \cdot x \]
   10. Step-by-step derivation

   11. Applied rewrites 59.4%

       \[\leadsto \left(-z\right) \cdot x \]

   if -9.9999999999999998e294 < (+.f64 x (*.f64 (*.f64 y z) (-.f64 (tanh.f64 (/.f64 t y)) (tanh.f64 (/.f64 x y))))) < 2.00000000000000003e306

   1. Initial program 99.5%

      \[x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in y around inf

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + z \cdot \left(t - x\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(t - x\right) + x} \]

      2. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(t - x\right) \cdot z} + x \]

      3. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(t - x, z, x\right)} \]

      4. lower--.f64 53.8

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{t - x}, z, x\right) \]

   5. Applied rewrites 53.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(t - x, z, x\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in x around inf

      \[\leadsto x \cdot \color{blue}{\left(1 + -1 \cdot z\right)} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

   8. Applied rewrites 52.5%

      \[\leadsto \left(1 - z\right) \cdot \color{blue}{x} \]

   9. Taylor expanded in z around 0

      \[\leadsto 1 \cdot x \]
   10. Step-by-step derivation

   11. Applied rewrites 69.0%

       \[\leadsto 1 \cdot x \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 67.9%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \leq -1 \cdot 10^{+295} \lor \neg \left(x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \leq 2 \cdot 10^{+306}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;\left(-z\right) \cdot x\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;1 \cdot x\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 3: 63.8% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \leq 2 \cdot 10^{+306}:\\ \;\;\;\;1 \cdot x\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot t\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= (+ x (* (* y z) (- (tanh (/ t y)) (tanh (/ x y))))) 2e+306)
   (* 1.0 x)
   (* z t)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x + ((y * z) * (tanh((t / y)) - tanh((x / y))))) <= 2e+306) {
		tmp = 1.0 * x;
	} else {
		tmp = z * t;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((x + ((y * z) * (tanh((t / y)) - tanh((x / y))))) <= 2d+306) then
        tmp = 1.0d0 * x
    else
        tmp = z * t
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x + ((y * z) * (Math.tanh((t / y)) - Math.tanh((x / y))))) <= 2e+306) {
		tmp = 1.0 * x;
	} else {
		tmp = z * t;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	tmp = 0
	if (x + ((y * z) * (math.tanh((t / y)) - math.tanh((x / y))))) <= 2e+306:
		tmp = 1.0 * x
	else:
		tmp = z * t
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (Float64(x + Float64(Float64(y * z) * Float64(tanh(Float64(t / y)) - tanh(Float64(x / y))))) <= 2e+306)
		tmp = Float64(1.0 * x);
	else
		tmp = Float64(z * t);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((x + ((y * z) * (tanh((t / y)) - tanh((x / y))))) <= 2e+306)
		tmp = 1.0 * x;
	else
		tmp = z * t;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := If[LessEqual[N[(x + N[(N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision] * N[(N[Tanh[N[(t / y), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] - N[Tanh[N[(x / y), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], 2e+306], N[(1.0 * x), $MachinePrecision], N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (+.f64 x (*.f64 (*.f64 y z) (-.f64 (tanh.f64 (/.f64 t y)) (tanh.f64 (/.f64 x y))))) < 2.00000000000000003e306

   1. Initial program 98.4%

      \[x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in y around inf

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + z \cdot \left(t - x\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(t - x\right) + x} \]

      2. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(t - x\right) \cdot z} + x \]

      3. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(t - x, z, x\right)} \]

      4. lower--.f64 55.9

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{t - x}, z, x\right) \]

   5. Applied rewrites 55.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(t - x, z, x\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in x around inf

      \[\leadsto x \cdot \color{blue}{\left(1 + -1 \cdot z\right)} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

   8. Applied rewrites 53.1%

      \[\leadsto \left(1 - z\right) \cdot \color{blue}{x} \]

   9. Taylor expanded in z around 0

      \[\leadsto 1 \cdot x \]
   10. Step-by-step derivation

   11. Applied rewrites 65.4%

       \[\leadsto 1 \cdot x \]

   if 2.00000000000000003e306 < (+.f64 x (*.f64 (*.f64 y z) (-.f64 (tanh.f64 (/.f64 t y)) (tanh.f64 (/.f64 x y)))))

   1. Initial program 42.0%

      \[x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in y around inf

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + z \cdot \left(t - x\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(t - x\right) + x} \]

      2. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(t - x\right) \cdot z} + x \]

      3. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(t - x, z, x\right)} \]

      4. lower--.f64 100.0

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{t - x}, z, x\right) \]

   5. Applied rewrites 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(t - x, z, x\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in x around 0

      \[\leadsto t \cdot \color{blue}{z} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

   8. Applied rewrites 44.5%

      \[\leadsto z \cdot \color{blue}{t} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 4: 82.5% accurate, 1.6× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -1.5 \cdot 10^{-104} \lor \neg \left(y \leq 1.9 \cdot 10^{-79}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(\left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \frac{x}{y}\right) \cdot y, z, x\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;1 \cdot x\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= y -1.5e-104) (not (<= y 1.9e-79)))
   (fma (* (- (tanh (/ t y)) (/ x y)) y) z x)
   (* 1.0 x)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if ((y <= -1.5e-104) || !(y <= 1.9e-79)) {
		tmp = fma(((tanh((t / y)) - (x / y)) * y), z, x);
	} else {
		tmp = 1.0 * x;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((y <= -1.5e-104) || !(y <= 1.9e-79))
		tmp = fma(Float64(Float64(tanh(Float64(t / y)) - Float64(x / y)) * y), z, x);
	else
		tmp = Float64(1.0 * x);
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := If[Or[LessEqual[y, -1.5e-104], N[Not[LessEqual[y, 1.9e-79]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(N[(N[(N[Tanh[N[(t / y), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] - N[(x / y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] * y), $MachinePrecision] * z + x), $MachinePrecision], N[(1.0 * x), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if y < -1.5000000000000001e-104 or 1.9000000000000001e-79 < y

   1. Initial program 91.2%

      \[x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing
   3. Step-by-step derivation

      1. lift-+.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right)} \]

      2. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) + x} \]

      3. lift-*.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right)} + x \]

      4. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)} + x \]

      5. lift-*.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z\right)} + x \]

      6. associate-*r* N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \cdot y\right) \cdot z} + x \]

      7. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \cdot y, z, x\right)} \]

      8. lower-*.f64 98.1

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{\left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \cdot y}, z, x\right) \]

   4. Applied rewrites 98.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \cdot y, z, x\right)} \]

   5. Taylor expanded in x around 0

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \color{blue}{\frac{x}{y}}\right) \cdot y, z, x\right) \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. lower-/.f64 84.3

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \color{blue}{\frac{x}{y}}\right) \cdot y, z, x\right) \]

   7. Applied rewrites 84.3%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \color{blue}{\frac{x}{y}}\right) \cdot y, z, x\right) \]

   if -1.5000000000000001e-104 < y < 1.9000000000000001e-79

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in y around inf

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + z \cdot \left(t - x\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(t - x\right) + x} \]

      2. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(t - x\right) \cdot z} + x \]

      3. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(t - x, z, x\right)} \]

      4. lower--.f64 40.3

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{t - x}, z, x\right) \]

   5. Applied rewrites 40.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(t - x, z, x\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in x around inf

      \[\leadsto x \cdot \color{blue}{\left(1 + -1 \cdot z\right)} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

   8. Applied rewrites 46.9%

      \[\leadsto \left(1 - z\right) \cdot \color{blue}{x} \]

   9. Taylor expanded in z around 0

      \[\leadsto 1 \cdot x \]
   10. Step-by-step derivation

   11. Applied rewrites 84.6%

       \[\leadsto 1 \cdot x \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 84.4%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -1.5 \cdot 10^{-104} \lor \neg \left(y \leq 1.9 \cdot 10^{-79}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(\left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \frac{x}{y}\right) \cdot y, z, x\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;1 \cdot x\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 5: 77.6% accurate, 1.6× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -6.2 \cdot 10^{-56} \lor \neg \left(y \leq 1.04 \cdot 10^{-94}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(\left(\frac{t}{y} - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \cdot z, y, x\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;1 \cdot x\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= y -6.2e-56) (not (<= y 1.04e-94)))
   (fma (* (- (/ t y) (tanh (/ x y))) z) y x)
   (* 1.0 x)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if ((y <= -6.2e-56) || !(y <= 1.04e-94)) {
		tmp = fma((((t / y) - tanh((x / y))) * z), y, x);
	} else {
		tmp = 1.0 * x;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((y <= -6.2e-56) || !(y <= 1.04e-94))
		tmp = fma(Float64(Float64(Float64(t / y) - tanh(Float64(x / y))) * z), y, x);
	else
		tmp = Float64(1.0 * x);
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := If[Or[LessEqual[y, -6.2e-56], N[Not[LessEqual[y, 1.04e-94]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(N[(N[(N[(t / y), $MachinePrecision] - N[Tanh[N[(x / y), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] * z), $MachinePrecision] * y + x), $MachinePrecision], N[(1.0 * x), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if y < -6.19999999999999975e-56 or 1.04e-94 < y

   1. Initial program 90.7%

      \[x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in y around inf

      \[\leadsto x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\frac{t}{y}} - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. lower-/.f64 69.7

         \[\leadsto x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\frac{t}{y}} - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \]

   5. Applied rewrites 69.7%

      \[\leadsto x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\frac{t}{y}} - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. lift-+.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\frac{t}{y} - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right)} \]

      2. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\frac{t}{y} - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) + x} \]

      3. lift-*.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\frac{t}{y} - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right)} + x \]

      4. lift-*.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z\right)} \cdot \left(\frac{t}{y} - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) + x \]

      5. associate-*l* N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(\frac{t}{y} - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right)\right)} + x \]

      6. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(z \cdot \left(\frac{t}{y} - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right)\right) \cdot y} + x \]

      7. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z \cdot \left(\frac{t}{y} - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right), y, x\right)} \]

      8. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{\left(\frac{t}{y} - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \cdot z}, y, x\right) \]

      9. lower-*.f64 75.5

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{\left(\frac{t}{y} - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \cdot z}, y, x\right) \]

   7. Applied rewrites 75.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\left(\frac{t}{y} - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \cdot z, y, x\right)} \]

   if -6.19999999999999975e-56 < y < 1.04e-94

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in y around inf

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + z \cdot \left(t - x\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(t - x\right) + x} \]

      2. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(t - x\right) \cdot z} + x \]

      3. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(t - x, z, x\right)} \]

      4. lower--.f64 40.9

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{t - x}, z, x\right) \]

   5. Applied rewrites 40.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(t - x, z, x\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in x around inf

      \[\leadsto x \cdot \color{blue}{\left(1 + -1 \cdot z\right)} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

   8. Applied rewrites 49.0%

      \[\leadsto \left(1 - z\right) \cdot \color{blue}{x} \]

   9. Taylor expanded in z around 0

      \[\leadsto 1 \cdot x \]
   10. Step-by-step derivation

   11. Applied rewrites 83.3%

       \[\leadsto 1 \cdot x \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 78.6%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -6.2 \cdot 10^{-56} \lor \neg \left(y \leq 1.04 \cdot 10^{-94}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(\left(\frac{t}{y} - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \cdot z, y, x\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;1 \cdot x\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 6: 77.8% accurate, 10.8× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -1.15 \cdot 10^{-55} \lor \neg \left(y \leq 5.5 \cdot 10^{+27}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(t - x, z, x\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;1 \cdot x\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= y -1.15e-55) (not (<= y 5.5e+27))) (fma (- t x) z x) (* 1.0 x)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if ((y <= -1.15e-55) || !(y <= 5.5e+27)) {
		tmp = fma((t - x), z, x);
	} else {
		tmp = 1.0 * x;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((y <= -1.15e-55) || !(y <= 5.5e+27))
		tmp = fma(Float64(t - x), z, x);
	else
		tmp = Float64(1.0 * x);
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := If[Or[LessEqual[y, -1.15e-55], N[Not[LessEqual[y, 5.5e+27]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(N[(t - x), $MachinePrecision] * z + x), $MachinePrecision], N[(1.0 * x), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if y < -1.15000000000000006e-55 or 5.49999999999999966e27 < y

   1. Initial program 88.9%

      \[x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in y around inf

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + z \cdot \left(t - x\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(t - x\right) + x} \]

      2. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(t - x\right) \cdot z} + x \]

      3. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(t - x, z, x\right)} \]

      4. lower--.f64 79.1

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{t - x}, z, x\right) \]

   5. Applied rewrites 79.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(t - x, z, x\right)} \]

   if -1.15000000000000006e-55 < y < 5.49999999999999966e27

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in y around inf

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + z \cdot \left(t - x\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(t - x\right) + x} \]

      2. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(t - x\right) \cdot z} + x \]

      3. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(t - x, z, x\right)} \]

      4. lower--.f64 38.9

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{t - x}, z, x\right) \]

   5. Applied rewrites 38.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(t - x, z, x\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in x around inf

      \[\leadsto x \cdot \color{blue}{\left(1 + -1 \cdot z\right)} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

   8. Applied rewrites 45.4%

      \[\leadsto \left(1 - z\right) \cdot \color{blue}{x} \]

   9. Taylor expanded in z around 0

      \[\leadsto 1 \cdot x \]
   10. Step-by-step derivation

   11. Applied rewrites 74.6%

       \[\leadsto 1 \cdot x \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 76.9%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -1.15 \cdot 10^{-55} \lor \neg \left(y \leq 5.5 \cdot 10^{+27}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(t - x, z, x\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;1 \cdot x\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 7: 67.3% accurate, 11.4× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -9.5 \cdot 10^{+44} \lor \neg \left(y \leq 5.8 \cdot 10^{+27}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;\left(1 - z\right) \cdot x\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;1 \cdot x\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= y -9.5e+44) (not (<= y 5.8e+27))) (* (- 1.0 z) x) (* 1.0 x)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if ((y <= -9.5e+44) || !(y <= 5.8e+27)) {
		tmp = (1.0 - z) * x;
	} else {
		tmp = 1.0 * x;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((y <= (-9.5d+44)) .or. (.not. (y <= 5.8d+27))) then
        tmp = (1.0d0 - z) * x
    else
        tmp = 1.0d0 * x
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if ((y <= -9.5e+44) || !(y <= 5.8e+27)) {
		tmp = (1.0 - z) * x;
	} else {
		tmp = 1.0 * x;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	tmp = 0
	if (y <= -9.5e+44) or not (y <= 5.8e+27):
		tmp = (1.0 - z) * x
	else:
		tmp = 1.0 * x
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((y <= -9.5e+44) || !(y <= 5.8e+27))
		tmp = Float64(Float64(1.0 - z) * x);
	else
		tmp = Float64(1.0 * x);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((y <= -9.5e+44) || ~((y <= 5.8e+27)))
		tmp = (1.0 - z) * x;
	else
		tmp = 1.0 * x;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := If[Or[LessEqual[y, -9.5e+44], N[Not[LessEqual[y, 5.8e+27]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(N[(1.0 - z), $MachinePrecision] * x), $MachinePrecision], N[(1.0 * x), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if y < -9.5000000000000004e44 or 5.8000000000000002e27 < y

   1. Initial program 87.5%

      \[x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in y around inf

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + z \cdot \left(t - x\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(t - x\right) + x} \]

      2. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(t - x\right) \cdot z} + x \]

      3. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(t - x, z, x\right)} \]

      4. lower--.f64 80.6

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{t - x}, z, x\right) \]

   5. Applied rewrites 80.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(t - x, z, x\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in x around inf

      \[\leadsto x \cdot \color{blue}{\left(1 + -1 \cdot z\right)} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

   8. Applied rewrites 63.1%

      \[\leadsto \left(1 - z\right) \cdot \color{blue}{x} \]

   if -9.5000000000000004e44 < y < 5.8000000000000002e27

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in y around inf

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + z \cdot \left(t - x\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(t - x\right) + x} \]

      2. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(t - x\right) \cdot z} + x \]

      3. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(t - x, z, x\right)} \]

      4. lower--.f64 41.7

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{t - x}, z, x\right) \]

   5. Applied rewrites 41.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(t - x, z, x\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in x around inf

      \[\leadsto x \cdot \color{blue}{\left(1 + -1 \cdot z\right)} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

   8. Applied rewrites 45.6%

      \[\leadsto \left(1 - z\right) \cdot \color{blue}{x} \]

   9. Taylor expanded in z around 0

      \[\leadsto 1 \cdot x \]
   10. Step-by-step derivation

   11. Applied rewrites 73.8%

       \[\leadsto 1 \cdot x \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 69.0%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -9.5 \cdot 10^{+44} \lor \neg \left(y \leq 5.8 \cdot 10^{+27}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;\left(1 - z\right) \cdot x\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;1 \cdot x\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 8: 17.1% accurate, 39.8× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ z \cdot t \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t) :precision binary64 (* z t))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return z * t;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = z * t
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return z * t;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return z * t

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(z * t)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = z * t;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 94.4%

   \[x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \]
2. Add Preprocessing

3. Taylor expanded in y around inf

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + z \cdot \left(t - x\right)} \]
4. Step-by-step derivation

   1. +-commutative N/A

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(t - x\right) + x} \]

   2. *-commutative N/A

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(t - x\right) \cdot z} + x \]

   3. lower-fma.f64 N/A

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(t - x, z, x\right)} \]

   4. lower--.f64 59.0

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{t - x}, z, x\right) \]

5. Applied rewrites 59.0%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(t - x, z, x\right)} \]

6. Taylor expanded in x around 0

   \[\leadsto t \cdot \color{blue}{z} \]
7. Step-by-step derivation

8. Applied rewrites 13.1%

   \[\leadsto z \cdot \color{blue}{t} \]
9. Add Preprocessing

Developer Target 1: 96.7% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x + y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right)\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (+ x (* y (* z (- (tanh (/ t y)) (tanh (/ x y)))))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x + (y * (z * (tanh((t / y)) - tanh((x / y)))));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = x + (y * (z * (tanh((t / y)) - tanh((x / y)))))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x + (y * (z * (Math.tanh((t / y)) - Math.tanh((x / y)))));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return x + (y * (z * (math.tanh((t / y)) - math.tanh((x / y)))))

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(x + Float64(y * Float64(z * Float64(tanh(Float64(t / y)) - tanh(Float64(x / y))))))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = x + (y * (z * (tanh((t / y)) - tanh((x / y)))));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(x + N[(y * N[(z * N[(N[Tanh[N[(t / y), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] - N[Tanh[N[(x / y), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2024332 
(FPCore (x y z t)
  :name "SynthBasics:moogVCF from YampaSynth-0.2"
  :precision binary64

  :alt
  (! :herbie-platform default (+ x (* y (* z (- (tanh (/ t y)) (tanh (/ x y)))))))

  (+ x (* (* y z) (- (tanh (/ t y)) (tanh (/ x y))))))