SynthBasics:oscSampleBasedAux from YampaSynth-0.2

Percentage Accurate: 100.0% → 100.0%

Time: 3.1s

Alternatives: 6

Speedup: 1.2×

• 21.2% of points produce a very large (infinite) output. You may want to add a precondition.

Specification

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x + y \cdot \left(z - x\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (+ x (* y (- z x))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x + (y * (z - x));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = x + (y * (z - x))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x + (y * (z - x));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return x + (y * (z - x))

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(x + Float64(y * Float64(z - x)))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = x + (y * (z - x));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(x + N[(y * N[(z - x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Initial Program: 100.0% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x + y \cdot \left(z - x\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (+ x (* y (- z x))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x + (y * (z - x));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = x + (y * (z - x))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x + (y * (z - x));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return x + (y * (z - x))

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(x + Float64(y * Float64(z - x)))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = x + (y * (z - x));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(x + N[(y * N[(z - x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Alternative 1: 100.0% accurate, 1.2× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \mathsf{fma}\left(z - x, y, x\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (fma (- z x) y x))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return fma((z - x), y, x);
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return fma(Float64(z - x), y, x)
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(N[(z - x), $MachinePrecision] * y + x), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 100.0%

   \[x + y \cdot \left(z - x\right) \]
2. Add Preprocessing
3. Step-by-step derivation

   1. lift-+.f64 N/A

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + y \cdot \left(z - x\right)} \]

   2. +-commutative N/A

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(z - x\right) + x} \]

   3. lift-*.f64 N/A

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(z - x\right)} + x \]

   4. *-commutative N/A

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(z - x\right) \cdot y} + x \]

   5. lower-fma.f64 100.0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z - x, y, x\right)} \]

4. Applied rewrites 100.0%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z - x, y, x\right)} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 2: 60.5% accurate, 0.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_0 := \left(-y\right) \cdot x\\ \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -8.8 \cdot 10^{+170}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_0\\ \mathbf{elif}\;y \leq -2.15 \cdot 10^{-67}:\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot y\\ \mathbf{elif}\;y \leq 1:\\ \;\;\;\;1 \cdot x\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_0\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_0 (* (- y) x)))
   (if (<= y -8.8e+170)
     t_0
     (if (<= y -2.15e-67) (* z y) (if (<= y 1.0) (* 1.0 x) t_0)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double t_0 = -y * x;
	double tmp;
	if (y <= -8.8e+170) {
		tmp = t_0;
	} else if (y <= -2.15e-67) {
		tmp = z * y;
	} else if (y <= 1.0) {
		tmp = 1.0 * x;
	} else {
		tmp = t_0;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: t_0
    real(8) :: tmp
    t_0 = -y * x
    if (y <= (-8.8d+170)) then
        tmp = t_0
    else if (y <= (-2.15d-67)) then
        tmp = z * y
    else if (y <= 1.0d0) then
        tmp = 1.0d0 * x
    else
        tmp = t_0
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double t_0 = -y * x;
	double tmp;
	if (y <= -8.8e+170) {
		tmp = t_0;
	} else if (y <= -2.15e-67) {
		tmp = z * y;
	} else if (y <= 1.0) {
		tmp = 1.0 * x;
	} else {
		tmp = t_0;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	t_0 = -y * x
	tmp = 0
	if y <= -8.8e+170:
		tmp = t_0
	elif y <= -2.15e-67:
		tmp = z * y
	elif y <= 1.0:
		tmp = 1.0 * x
	else:
		tmp = t_0
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	t_0 = Float64(Float64(-y) * x)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (y <= -8.8e+170)
		tmp = t_0;
	elseif (y <= -2.15e-67)
		tmp = Float64(z * y);
	elseif (y <= 1.0)
		tmp = Float64(1.0 * x);
	else
		tmp = t_0;
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	t_0 = -y * x;
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (y <= -8.8e+170)
		tmp = t_0;
	elseif (y <= -2.15e-67)
		tmp = z * y;
	elseif (y <= 1.0)
		tmp = 1.0 * x;
	else
		tmp = t_0;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := Block[{t$95$0 = N[((-y) * x), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[y, -8.8e+170], t$95$0, If[LessEqual[y, -2.15e-67], N[(z * y), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[y, 1.0], N[(1.0 * x), $MachinePrecision], t$95$0]]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if y < -8.79999999999999955e170 or 1 < y

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[x + y \cdot \left(z - x\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around inf

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(1 + -1 \cdot y\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 + -1 \cdot y\right) \cdot x} \]

      2. lower-*.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 + -1 \cdot y\right) \cdot x} \]

      3. fp-cancel-sign-sub-inv N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - \left(\mathsf{neg}\left(-1\right)\right) \cdot y\right)} \cdot x \]

      4. metadata-eval N/A

         \[\leadsto \left(1 - \color{blue}{1} \cdot y\right) \cdot x \]

      5. *-lft-identity N/A

         \[\leadsto \left(1 - \color{blue}{y}\right) \cdot x \]

      6. lower--.f64 64.7

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - y\right)} \cdot x \]

   5. Applied rewrites 64.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - y\right) \cdot x} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in y around inf

      \[\leadsto \left(-1 \cdot y\right) \cdot x \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

   8. Applied rewrites 64.6%

      \[\leadsto \left(-y\right) \cdot x \]

   if -8.79999999999999955e170 < y < -2.15000000000000013e-67

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[x + y \cdot \left(z - x\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot z} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot y} \]

      2. lower-*.f64 57.3

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot y} \]

   5. Applied rewrites 57.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot y} \]

   if -2.15000000000000013e-67 < y < 1

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[x + y \cdot \left(z - x\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around inf

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(1 + -1 \cdot y\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 + -1 \cdot y\right) \cdot x} \]

      2. lower-*.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 + -1 \cdot y\right) \cdot x} \]

      3. fp-cancel-sign-sub-inv N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - \left(\mathsf{neg}\left(-1\right)\right) \cdot y\right)} \cdot x \]

      4. metadata-eval N/A

         \[\leadsto \left(1 - \color{blue}{1} \cdot y\right) \cdot x \]

      5. *-lft-identity N/A

         \[\leadsto \left(1 - \color{blue}{y}\right) \cdot x \]

      6. lower--.f64 72.8

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - y\right)} \cdot x \]

   5. Applied rewrites 72.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - y\right) \cdot x} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in y around 0

      \[\leadsto 1 \cdot x \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

   8. Applied rewrites 72.6%

      \[\leadsto 1 \cdot x \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.
4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 3: 84.5% accurate, 0.6× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -0.92 \lor \neg \left(y \leq 1.85 \cdot 10^{-64}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;\left(z - x\right) \cdot y\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(1 - y\right) \cdot x\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= y -0.92) (not (<= y 1.85e-64))) (* (- z x) y) (* (- 1.0 y) x)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((y <= -0.92) || !(y <= 1.85e-64)) {
		tmp = (z - x) * y;
	} else {
		tmp = (1.0 - y) * x;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((y <= (-0.92d0)) .or. (.not. (y <= 1.85d-64))) then
        tmp = (z - x) * y
    else
        tmp = (1.0d0 - y) * x
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((y <= -0.92) || !(y <= 1.85e-64)) {
		tmp = (z - x) * y;
	} else {
		tmp = (1.0 - y) * x;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if (y <= -0.92) or not (y <= 1.85e-64):
		tmp = (z - x) * y
	else:
		tmp = (1.0 - y) * x
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((y <= -0.92) || !(y <= 1.85e-64))
		tmp = Float64(Float64(z - x) * y);
	else
		tmp = Float64(Float64(1.0 - y) * x);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((y <= -0.92) || ~((y <= 1.85e-64)))
		tmp = (z - x) * y;
	else
		tmp = (1.0 - y) * x;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[Or[LessEqual[y, -0.92], N[Not[LessEqual[y, 1.85e-64]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(N[(z - x), $MachinePrecision] * y), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[(1.0 - y), $MachinePrecision] * x), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if y < -0.92000000000000004 or 1.84999999999999999e-64 < y

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[x + y \cdot \left(z - x\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot z} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot y} \]

      2. lower-*.f64 48.7

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot y} \]

   5. Applied rewrites 48.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot y} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in y around inf

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(z - x\right)} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(z - x\right) \cdot y} \]

      2. lower-*.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(z - x\right) \cdot y} \]

      3. lower--.f64 93.0

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(z - x\right)} \cdot y \]

   8. Applied rewrites 93.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(z - x\right) \cdot y} \]

   if -0.92000000000000004 < y < 1.84999999999999999e-64

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[x + y \cdot \left(z - x\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around inf

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(1 + -1 \cdot y\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 + -1 \cdot y\right) \cdot x} \]

      2. lower-*.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 + -1 \cdot y\right) \cdot x} \]

      3. fp-cancel-sign-sub-inv N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - \left(\mathsf{neg}\left(-1\right)\right) \cdot y\right)} \cdot x \]

      4. metadata-eval N/A

         \[\leadsto \left(1 - \color{blue}{1} \cdot y\right) \cdot x \]

      5. *-lft-identity N/A

         \[\leadsto \left(1 - \color{blue}{y}\right) \cdot x \]

      6. lower--.f64 75.5

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - y\right)} \cdot x \]

   5. Applied rewrites 75.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - y\right) \cdot x} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 85.2%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -0.92 \lor \neg \left(y \leq 1.85 \cdot 10^{-64}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;\left(z - x\right) \cdot y\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(1 - y\right) \cdot x\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 4: 74.3% accurate, 0.6× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -1.25 \cdot 10^{+19} \lor \neg \left(z \leq 5.5 \cdot 10^{+62}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot y\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(1 - y\right) \cdot x\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= z -1.25e+19) (not (<= z 5.5e+62))) (* z y) (* (- 1.0 y) x)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z <= -1.25e+19) || !(z <= 5.5e+62)) {
		tmp = z * y;
	} else {
		tmp = (1.0 - y) * x;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((z <= (-1.25d+19)) .or. (.not. (z <= 5.5d+62))) then
        tmp = z * y
    else
        tmp = (1.0d0 - y) * x
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z <= -1.25e+19) || !(z <= 5.5e+62)) {
		tmp = z * y;
	} else {
		tmp = (1.0 - y) * x;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if (z <= -1.25e+19) or not (z <= 5.5e+62):
		tmp = z * y
	else:
		tmp = (1.0 - y) * x
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((z <= -1.25e+19) || !(z <= 5.5e+62))
		tmp = Float64(z * y);
	else
		tmp = Float64(Float64(1.0 - y) * x);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((z <= -1.25e+19) || ~((z <= 5.5e+62)))
		tmp = z * y;
	else
		tmp = (1.0 - y) * x;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[Or[LessEqual[z, -1.25e+19], N[Not[LessEqual[z, 5.5e+62]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(z * y), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[(1.0 - y), $MachinePrecision] * x), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if z < -1.25e19 or 5.4999999999999997e62 < z

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[x + y \cdot \left(z - x\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot z} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot y} \]

      2. lower-*.f64 69.5

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot y} \]

   5. Applied rewrites 69.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot y} \]

   if -1.25e19 < z < 5.4999999999999997e62

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[x + y \cdot \left(z - x\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around inf

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(1 + -1 \cdot y\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 + -1 \cdot y\right) \cdot x} \]

      2. lower-*.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 + -1 \cdot y\right) \cdot x} \]

      3. fp-cancel-sign-sub-inv N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - \left(\mathsf{neg}\left(-1\right)\right) \cdot y\right)} \cdot x \]

      4. metadata-eval N/A

         \[\leadsto \left(1 - \color{blue}{1} \cdot y\right) \cdot x \]

      5. *-lft-identity N/A

         \[\leadsto \left(1 - \color{blue}{y}\right) \cdot x \]

      6. lower--.f64 83.6

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - y\right)} \cdot x \]

   5. Applied rewrites 83.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - y\right) \cdot x} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 78.0%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -1.25 \cdot 10^{+19} \lor \neg \left(z \leq 5.5 \cdot 10^{+62}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot y\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(1 - y\right) \cdot x\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 5: 61.3% accurate, 0.7× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -2.15 \cdot 10^{-67} \lor \neg \left(y \leq 1.45 \cdot 10^{-64}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot y\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;1 \cdot x\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= y -2.15e-67) (not (<= y 1.45e-64))) (* z y) (* 1.0 x)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((y <= -2.15e-67) || !(y <= 1.45e-64)) {
		tmp = z * y;
	} else {
		tmp = 1.0 * x;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((y <= (-2.15d-67)) .or. (.not. (y <= 1.45d-64))) then
        tmp = z * y
    else
        tmp = 1.0d0 * x
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((y <= -2.15e-67) || !(y <= 1.45e-64)) {
		tmp = z * y;
	} else {
		tmp = 1.0 * x;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if (y <= -2.15e-67) or not (y <= 1.45e-64):
		tmp = z * y
	else:
		tmp = 1.0 * x
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((y <= -2.15e-67) || !(y <= 1.45e-64))
		tmp = Float64(z * y);
	else
		tmp = Float64(1.0 * x);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((y <= -2.15e-67) || ~((y <= 1.45e-64)))
		tmp = z * y;
	else
		tmp = 1.0 * x;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[Or[LessEqual[y, -2.15e-67], N[Not[LessEqual[y, 1.45e-64]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(z * y), $MachinePrecision], N[(1.0 * x), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if y < -2.15000000000000013e-67 or 1.4499999999999999e-64 < y

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[x + y \cdot \left(z - x\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot z} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot y} \]

      2. lower-*.f64 48.3

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot y} \]

   5. Applied rewrites 48.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot y} \]

   if -2.15000000000000013e-67 < y < 1.4499999999999999e-64

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[x + y \cdot \left(z - x\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around inf

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(1 + -1 \cdot y\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 + -1 \cdot y\right) \cdot x} \]

      2. lower-*.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 + -1 \cdot y\right) \cdot x} \]

      3. fp-cancel-sign-sub-inv N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - \left(\mathsf{neg}\left(-1\right)\right) \cdot y\right)} \cdot x \]

      4. metadata-eval N/A

         \[\leadsto \left(1 - \color{blue}{1} \cdot y\right) \cdot x \]

      5. *-lft-identity N/A

         \[\leadsto \left(1 - \color{blue}{y}\right) \cdot x \]

      6. lower--.f64 77.3

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - y\right)} \cdot x \]

   5. Applied rewrites 77.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - y\right) \cdot x} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in y around 0

      \[\leadsto 1 \cdot x \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

   8. Applied rewrites 77.3%

      \[\leadsto 1 \cdot x \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 59.9%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -2.15 \cdot 10^{-67} \lor \neg \left(y \leq 1.45 \cdot 10^{-64}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot y\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;1 \cdot x\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 6: 42.2% accurate, 2.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ z \cdot y \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (* z y))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return z * y;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = z * y
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return z * y;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return z * y

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(z * y)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = z * y;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(z * y), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 100.0%

   \[x + y \cdot \left(z - x\right) \]
2. Add Preprocessing

3. Taylor expanded in x around 0

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot z} \]
4. Step-by-step derivation

   1. *-commutative N/A

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot y} \]

   2. lower-*.f64 39.0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot y} \]

5. Applied rewrites 39.0%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot y} \]
6. Add Preprocessing

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2024332 
(FPCore (x y z)
  :name "SynthBasics:oscSampleBasedAux from YampaSynth-0.2"
  :precision binary64
  (+ x (* y (- z x))))