Optimisation.CirclePacking:place from circle-packing-0.1.0.4, H

Percentage Accurate: 100.0% → 100.0%

Time: 3.5s

Alternatives: 8

Speedup: 1.0×

• 21.8% of points produce a very large (infinite) output. You may want to add a precondition.

Specification

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(x + y\right) \cdot \left(1 - z\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (* (+ x y) (- 1.0 z)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (x + y) * (1.0 - z);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = (x + y) * (1.0d0 - z)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (x + y) * (1.0 - z);
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return (x + y) * (1.0 - z)

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(Float64(x + y) * Float64(1.0 - z))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = (x + y) * (1.0 - z);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(N[(x + y), $MachinePrecision] * N[(1.0 - z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Initial Program: 100.0% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(x + y\right) \cdot \left(1 - z\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (* (+ x y) (- 1.0 z)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (x + y) * (1.0 - z);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = (x + y) * (1.0d0 - z)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (x + y) * (1.0 - z);
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return (x + y) * (1.0 - z)

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(Float64(x + y) * Float64(1.0 - z))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = (x + y) * (1.0 - z);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(N[(x + y), $MachinePrecision] * N[(1.0 - z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Alternative 1: 100.0% accurate, 0.8× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \mathsf{fma}\left(x + y, -z, x + y\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (fma (+ x y) (- z) (+ x y)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return fma((x + y), -z, (x + y));
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return fma(Float64(x + y), Float64(-z), Float64(x + y))
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(N[(x + y), $MachinePrecision] * (-z) + N[(x + y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 100.0%

   \[\left(x + y\right) \cdot \left(1 - z\right) \]
2. Add Preprocessing
3. Step-by-step derivation

   1. lift-*.f64 N/A

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y\right) \cdot \left(1 - z\right)} \]

   2. lift--.f64 N/A

      \[\leadsto \left(x + y\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(1 - z\right)} \]

   3. sub-neg N/A

      \[\leadsto \left(x + y\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(\mathsf{neg}\left(z\right)\right)\right)} \]

   4. +-commutative N/A

      \[\leadsto \left(x + y\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\left(\mathsf{neg}\left(z\right)\right) + 1\right)} \]

   5. distribute-lft-in N/A

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y\right) \cdot \left(\mathsf{neg}\left(z\right)\right) + \left(x + y\right) \cdot 1} \]

   6. *-rgt-identity N/A

      \[\leadsto \left(x + y\right) \cdot \left(\mathsf{neg}\left(z\right)\right) + \color{blue}{\left(x + y\right)} \]

   7. lower-fma.f64 N/A

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x + y, \mathsf{neg}\left(z\right), x + y\right)} \]

   8. lift-+.f64 N/A

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{x + y}, \mathsf{neg}\left(z\right), x + y\right) \]

   9. +-commutative N/A

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{y + x}, \mathsf{neg}\left(z\right), x + y\right) \]

   10. lower-+.f64 N/A

       \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{y + x}, \mathsf{neg}\left(z\right), x + y\right) \]

   11. lower-neg.f64 100.0

       \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y + x, \color{blue}{-z}, x + y\right) \]

   12. lift-+.f64 N/A

       \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y + x, -z, \color{blue}{x + y}\right) \]

   13. +-commutative N/A

       \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y + x, -z, \color{blue}{y + x}\right) \]

   14. lower-+.f64 100.0

       \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y + x, -z, \color{blue}{y + x}\right) \]

4. Applied rewrites 100.0%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y + x, -z, y + x\right)} \]

5. Final simplification 100.0%

   \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x + y, -z, x + y\right) \]
6. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 2: 48.6% accurate, 0.3× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x + y \leq -1 \cdot 10^{-249}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(1 - z\right) \cdot x\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x + y \leq 2 \cdot 10^{+144}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + y\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x + y \leq 1.2 \cdot 10^{+243}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(-y\right) \cdot z\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + y\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= (+ x y) -1e-249)
   (* (- 1.0 z) x)
   (if (<= (+ x y) 2e+144)
     (+ x y)
     (if (<= (+ x y) 1.2e+243) (* (- y) z) (+ x y)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x + y) <= -1e-249) {
		tmp = (1.0 - z) * x;
	} else if ((x + y) <= 2e+144) {
		tmp = x + y;
	} else if ((x + y) <= 1.2e+243) {
		tmp = -y * z;
	} else {
		tmp = x + y;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((x + y) <= (-1d-249)) then
        tmp = (1.0d0 - z) * x
    else if ((x + y) <= 2d+144) then
        tmp = x + y
    else if ((x + y) <= 1.2d+243) then
        tmp = -y * z
    else
        tmp = x + y
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x + y) <= -1e-249) {
		tmp = (1.0 - z) * x;
	} else if ((x + y) <= 2e+144) {
		tmp = x + y;
	} else if ((x + y) <= 1.2e+243) {
		tmp = -y * z;
	} else {
		tmp = x + y;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if (x + y) <= -1e-249:
		tmp = (1.0 - z) * x
	elif (x + y) <= 2e+144:
		tmp = x + y
	elif (x + y) <= 1.2e+243:
		tmp = -y * z
	else:
		tmp = x + y
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (Float64(x + y) <= -1e-249)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(1.0 - z) * x);
	elseif (Float64(x + y) <= 2e+144)
		tmp = Float64(x + y);
	elseif (Float64(x + y) <= 1.2e+243)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(-y) * z);
	else
		tmp = Float64(x + y);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((x + y) <= -1e-249)
		tmp = (1.0 - z) * x;
	elseif ((x + y) <= 2e+144)
		tmp = x + y;
	elseif ((x + y) <= 1.2e+243)
		tmp = -y * z;
	else
		tmp = x + y;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[LessEqual[N[(x + y), $MachinePrecision], -1e-249], N[(N[(1.0 - z), $MachinePrecision] * x), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[N[(x + y), $MachinePrecision], 2e+144], N[(x + y), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[N[(x + y), $MachinePrecision], 1.2e+243], N[((-y) * z), $MachinePrecision], N[(x + y), $MachinePrecision]]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if (+.f64 x y) < -1.00000000000000005e-249

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(x + y\right) \cdot \left(1 - z\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around inf

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(1 - z\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - z\right) \cdot x} \]

      2. lower-*.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - z\right) \cdot x} \]

      3. lower--.f64 55.2

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - z\right)} \cdot x \]

   5. Applied rewrites 55.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - z\right) \cdot x} \]

   if -1.00000000000000005e-249 < (+.f64 x y) < 2.00000000000000005e144 or 1.2e243 < (+.f64 x y)

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[\left(x + y\right) \cdot \left(1 - z\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(1 - z\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - z\right) \cdot y} \]

      2. lower-*.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - z\right) \cdot y} \]

      3. lower--.f64 54.6

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - z\right)} \cdot y \]

   5. Applied rewrites 54.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - z\right) \cdot y} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

   7. Applied rewrites 54.7%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(-z, \color{blue}{y}, y\right) \]

   8. Taylor expanded in z around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + y} \]
   9. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y + x} \]

      2. lower-+.f64 59.3

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y + x} \]

   10. Applied rewrites 59.3%

       \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y + x} \]

   if 2.00000000000000005e144 < (+.f64 x y) < 1.2e243

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(x + y\right) \cdot \left(1 - z\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(1 - z\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - z\right) \cdot y} \]

      2. lower-*.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - z\right) \cdot y} \]

      3. lower--.f64 38.4

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - z\right)} \cdot y \]

   5. Applied rewrites 38.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - z\right) \cdot y} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in z around inf

      \[\leadsto -1 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z\right)} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

   8. Applied rewrites 27.6%

      \[\leadsto \left(-y\right) \cdot \color{blue}{z} \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 53.8%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x + y \leq -1 \cdot 10^{-249}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(1 - z\right) \cdot x\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x + y \leq 2 \cdot 10^{+144}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + y\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x + y \leq 1.2 \cdot 10^{+243}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(-y\right) \cdot z\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + y\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 3: 74.6% accurate, 0.4× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_0 := \left(-y\right) \cdot z\\ t_1 := \left(-z\right) \cdot x\\ \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -8.8 \cdot 10^{+167}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_0\\ \mathbf{elif}\;z \leq -9:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_1\\ \mathbf{elif}\;z \leq 1:\\ \;\;\;\;x + y\\ \mathbf{elif}\;z \leq 2.1 \cdot 10^{+48}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_0\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_1\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_0 (* (- y) z)) (t_1 (* (- z) x)))
   (if (<= z -8.8e+167)
     t_0
     (if (<= z -9.0)
       t_1
       (if (<= z 1.0) (+ x y) (if (<= z 2.1e+48) t_0 t_1))))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double t_0 = -y * z;
	double t_1 = -z * x;
	double tmp;
	if (z <= -8.8e+167) {
		tmp = t_0;
	} else if (z <= -9.0) {
		tmp = t_1;
	} else if (z <= 1.0) {
		tmp = x + y;
	} else if (z <= 2.1e+48) {
		tmp = t_0;
	} else {
		tmp = t_1;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: t_0
    real(8) :: t_1
    real(8) :: tmp
    t_0 = -y * z
    t_1 = -z * x
    if (z <= (-8.8d+167)) then
        tmp = t_0
    else if (z <= (-9.0d0)) then
        tmp = t_1
    else if (z <= 1.0d0) then
        tmp = x + y
    else if (z <= 2.1d+48) then
        tmp = t_0
    else
        tmp = t_1
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double t_0 = -y * z;
	double t_1 = -z * x;
	double tmp;
	if (z <= -8.8e+167) {
		tmp = t_0;
	} else if (z <= -9.0) {
		tmp = t_1;
	} else if (z <= 1.0) {
		tmp = x + y;
	} else if (z <= 2.1e+48) {
		tmp = t_0;
	} else {
		tmp = t_1;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	t_0 = -y * z
	t_1 = -z * x
	tmp = 0
	if z <= -8.8e+167:
		tmp = t_0
	elif z <= -9.0:
		tmp = t_1
	elif z <= 1.0:
		tmp = x + y
	elif z <= 2.1e+48:
		tmp = t_0
	else:
		tmp = t_1
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	t_0 = Float64(Float64(-y) * z)
	t_1 = Float64(Float64(-z) * x)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (z <= -8.8e+167)
		tmp = t_0;
	elseif (z <= -9.0)
		tmp = t_1;
	elseif (z <= 1.0)
		tmp = Float64(x + y);
	elseif (z <= 2.1e+48)
		tmp = t_0;
	else
		tmp = t_1;
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	t_0 = -y * z;
	t_1 = -z * x;
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (z <= -8.8e+167)
		tmp = t_0;
	elseif (z <= -9.0)
		tmp = t_1;
	elseif (z <= 1.0)
		tmp = x + y;
	elseif (z <= 2.1e+48)
		tmp = t_0;
	else
		tmp = t_1;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := Block[{t$95$0 = N[((-y) * z), $MachinePrecision]}, Block[{t$95$1 = N[((-z) * x), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[z, -8.8e+167], t$95$0, If[LessEqual[z, -9.0], t$95$1, If[LessEqual[z, 1.0], N[(x + y), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[z, 2.1e+48], t$95$0, t$95$1]]]]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if z < -8.80000000000000013e167 or 1 < z < 2.0999999999999998e48

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(x + y\right) \cdot \left(1 - z\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(1 - z\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - z\right) \cdot y} \]

      2. lower-*.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - z\right) \cdot y} \]

      3. lower--.f64 46.2

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - z\right)} \cdot y \]

   5. Applied rewrites 46.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - z\right) \cdot y} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in z around inf

      \[\leadsto -1 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z\right)} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

   8. Applied rewrites 46.2%

      \[\leadsto \left(-y\right) \cdot \color{blue}{z} \]

   if -8.80000000000000013e167 < z < -9 or 2.0999999999999998e48 < z

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(x + y\right) \cdot \left(1 - z\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around inf

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(1 - z\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - z\right) \cdot x} \]

      2. lower-*.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - z\right) \cdot x} \]

      3. lower--.f64 54.9

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - z\right)} \cdot x \]

   5. Applied rewrites 54.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - z\right) \cdot x} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in z around inf

      \[\leadsto -1 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot z\right)} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

   8. Applied rewrites 53.1%

      \[\leadsto \left(-z\right) \cdot \color{blue}{x} \]

   if -9 < z < 1

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(x + y\right) \cdot \left(1 - z\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(1 - z\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - z\right) \cdot y} \]

      2. lower-*.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - z\right) \cdot y} \]

      3. lower--.f64 50.6

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - z\right)} \cdot y \]

   5. Applied rewrites 50.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - z\right) \cdot y} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

   7. Applied rewrites 50.6%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(-z, \color{blue}{y}, y\right) \]

   8. Taylor expanded in z around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + y} \]
   9. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y + x} \]

      2. lower-+.f64 98.0

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y + x} \]

   10. Applied rewrites 98.0%

       \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y + x} \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 73.4%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -8.8 \cdot 10^{+167}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(-y\right) \cdot z\\ \mathbf{elif}\;z \leq -9:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(-z\right) \cdot x\\ \mathbf{elif}\;z \leq 1:\\ \;\;\;\;x + y\\ \mathbf{elif}\;z \leq 2.1 \cdot 10^{+48}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(-y\right) \cdot z\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(-z\right) \cdot x\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 4: 74.9% accurate, 0.6× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_0 := \left(-z\right) \cdot x\\ \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -9:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_0\\ \mathbf{elif}\;z \leq 1:\\ \;\;\;\;x + y\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_0\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_0 (* (- z) x))) (if (<= z -9.0) t_0 (if (<= z 1.0) (+ x y) t_0))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double t_0 = -z * x;
	double tmp;
	if (z <= -9.0) {
		tmp = t_0;
	} else if (z <= 1.0) {
		tmp = x + y;
	} else {
		tmp = t_0;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: t_0
    real(8) :: tmp
    t_0 = -z * x
    if (z <= (-9.0d0)) then
        tmp = t_0
    else if (z <= 1.0d0) then
        tmp = x + y
    else
        tmp = t_0
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double t_0 = -z * x;
	double tmp;
	if (z <= -9.0) {
		tmp = t_0;
	} else if (z <= 1.0) {
		tmp = x + y;
	} else {
		tmp = t_0;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	t_0 = -z * x
	tmp = 0
	if z <= -9.0:
		tmp = t_0
	elif z <= 1.0:
		tmp = x + y
	else:
		tmp = t_0
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	t_0 = Float64(Float64(-z) * x)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (z <= -9.0)
		tmp = t_0;
	elseif (z <= 1.0)
		tmp = Float64(x + y);
	else
		tmp = t_0;
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	t_0 = -z * x;
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (z <= -9.0)
		tmp = t_0;
	elseif (z <= 1.0)
		tmp = x + y;
	else
		tmp = t_0;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := Block[{t$95$0 = N[((-z) * x), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[z, -9.0], t$95$0, If[LessEqual[z, 1.0], N[(x + y), $MachinePrecision], t$95$0]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if z < -9 or 1 < z

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(x + y\right) \cdot \left(1 - z\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around inf

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(1 - z\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - z\right) \cdot x} \]

      2. lower-*.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - z\right) \cdot x} \]

      3. lower--.f64 56.2

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - z\right)} \cdot x \]

   5. Applied rewrites 56.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - z\right) \cdot x} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in z around inf

      \[\leadsto -1 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot z\right)} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

   8. Applied rewrites 53.4%

      \[\leadsto \left(-z\right) \cdot \color{blue}{x} \]

   if -9 < z < 1

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(x + y\right) \cdot \left(1 - z\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(1 - z\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - z\right) \cdot y} \]

      2. lower-*.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - z\right) \cdot y} \]

      3. lower--.f64 50.6

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - z\right)} \cdot y \]

   5. Applied rewrites 50.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - z\right) \cdot y} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

   7. Applied rewrites 50.6%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(-z, \color{blue}{y}, y\right) \]

   8. Taylor expanded in z around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + y} \]
   9. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y + x} \]

      2. lower-+.f64 98.0

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y + x} \]

   10. Applied rewrites 98.0%

       \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y + x} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 74.8%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -9:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(-z\right) \cdot x\\ \mathbf{elif}\;z \leq 1:\\ \;\;\;\;x + y\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(-z\right) \cdot x\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 5: 52.3% accurate, 0.7× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x + y \leq -1 \cdot 10^{-249}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(1 - z\right) \cdot x\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(-z, y, y\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= (+ x y) -1e-249) (* (- 1.0 z) x) (fma (- z) y y)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x + y) <= -1e-249) {
		tmp = (1.0 - z) * x;
	} else {
		tmp = fma(-z, y, y);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (Float64(x + y) <= -1e-249)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(1.0 - z) * x);
	else
		tmp = fma(Float64(-z), y, y);
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[LessEqual[N[(x + y), $MachinePrecision], -1e-249], N[(N[(1.0 - z), $MachinePrecision] * x), $MachinePrecision], N[((-z) * y + y), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (+.f64 x y) < -1.00000000000000005e-249

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(x + y\right) \cdot \left(1 - z\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around inf

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(1 - z\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - z\right) \cdot x} \]

      2. lower-*.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - z\right) \cdot x} \]

      3. lower--.f64 55.2

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - z\right)} \cdot x \]

   5. Applied rewrites 55.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - z\right) \cdot x} \]

   if -1.00000000000000005e-249 < (+.f64 x y)

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[\left(x + y\right) \cdot \left(1 - z\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(1 - z\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - z\right) \cdot y} \]

      2. lower-*.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - z\right) \cdot y} \]

      3. lower--.f64 51.0

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - z\right)} \cdot y \]

   5. Applied rewrites 51.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - z\right) \cdot y} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

   7. Applied rewrites 51.0%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(-z, \color{blue}{y}, y\right) \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 6: 52.3% accurate, 0.7× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x + y \leq -1 \cdot 10^{-249}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(1 - z\right) \cdot x\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(1 - z\right) \cdot y\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= (+ x y) -1e-249) (* (- 1.0 z) x) (* (- 1.0 z) y)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x + y) <= -1e-249) {
		tmp = (1.0 - z) * x;
	} else {
		tmp = (1.0 - z) * y;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((x + y) <= (-1d-249)) then
        tmp = (1.0d0 - z) * x
    else
        tmp = (1.0d0 - z) * y
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x + y) <= -1e-249) {
		tmp = (1.0 - z) * x;
	} else {
		tmp = (1.0 - z) * y;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if (x + y) <= -1e-249:
		tmp = (1.0 - z) * x
	else:
		tmp = (1.0 - z) * y
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (Float64(x + y) <= -1e-249)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(1.0 - z) * x);
	else
		tmp = Float64(Float64(1.0 - z) * y);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((x + y) <= -1e-249)
		tmp = (1.0 - z) * x;
	else
		tmp = (1.0 - z) * y;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[LessEqual[N[(x + y), $MachinePrecision], -1e-249], N[(N[(1.0 - z), $MachinePrecision] * x), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[(1.0 - z), $MachinePrecision] * y), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (+.f64 x y) < -1.00000000000000005e-249

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(x + y\right) \cdot \left(1 - z\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around inf

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(1 - z\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - z\right) \cdot x} \]

      2. lower-*.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - z\right) \cdot x} \]

      3. lower--.f64 55.2

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - z\right)} \cdot x \]

   5. Applied rewrites 55.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - z\right) \cdot x} \]

   if -1.00000000000000005e-249 < (+.f64 x y)

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[\left(x + y\right) \cdot \left(1 - z\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(1 - z\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - z\right) \cdot y} \]

      2. lower-*.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - z\right) \cdot y} \]

      3. lower--.f64 51.0

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - z\right)} \cdot y \]

   5. Applied rewrites 51.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - z\right) \cdot y} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 7: 100.0% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(1 - z\right) \cdot \left(x + y\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (* (- 1.0 z) (+ x y)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (1.0 - z) * (x + y);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = (1.0d0 - z) * (x + y)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (1.0 - z) * (x + y);
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return (1.0 - z) * (x + y)

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(Float64(1.0 - z) * Float64(x + y))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = (1.0 - z) * (x + y);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(N[(1.0 - z), $MachinePrecision] * N[(x + y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 100.0%

   \[\left(x + y\right) \cdot \left(1 - z\right) \]
2. Add Preprocessing

3. Final simplification 100.0%

   \[\leadsto \left(1 - z\right) \cdot \left(x + y\right) \]
4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 8: 50.2% accurate, 3.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x + y \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (+ x y))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x + y;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = x + y
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x + y;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return x + y

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(x + y)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = x + y;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(x + y), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 100.0%

   \[\left(x + y\right) \cdot \left(1 - z\right) \]
2. Add Preprocessing

3. Taylor expanded in x around 0

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(1 - z\right)} \]
4. Step-by-step derivation

   1. *-commutative N/A

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - z\right) \cdot y} \]

   2. lower-*.f64 N/A

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - z\right) \cdot y} \]

   3. lower--.f64 50.1

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - z\right)} \cdot y \]

5. Applied rewrites 50.1%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - z\right) \cdot y} \]
6. Step-by-step derivation

7. Applied rewrites 50.1%

   \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(-z, \color{blue}{y}, y\right) \]

8. Taylor expanded in z around 0

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + y} \]
9. Step-by-step derivation

   1. +-commutative N/A

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y + x} \]

   2. lower-+.f64 48.8

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y + x} \]

10. Applied rewrites 48.8%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y + x} \]

11. Final simplification 48.8%

    \[\leadsto x + y \]
12. Add Preprocessing

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2024332 
(FPCore (x y z)
  :name "Optimisation.CirclePacking:place from circle-packing-0.1.0.4, H"
  :precision binary64
  (* (+ x y) (- 1.0 z)))