Maksimov and Kolovsky, Equation (32)

Percentage Accurate: 76.0% → 96.5%

Time: 9.0s

Alternatives: 6

Speedup: 1.6×

Specification

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \cos \left(\frac{K \cdot \left(m + n\right)}{2} - M\right) \cdot e^{\left(-{\left(\frac{m + n}{2} - M\right)}^{2}\right) - \left(\ell - \left|m - n\right|\right)} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (K m n M l)
 :precision binary64
 (*
  (cos (- (/ (* K (+ m n)) 2.0) M))
  (exp (- (- (pow (- (/ (+ m n) 2.0) M) 2.0)) (- l (fabs (- m n)))))))

C

double code(double K, double m, double n, double M, double l) {
	return cos((((K * (m + n)) / 2.0) - M)) * exp((-pow((((m + n) / 2.0) - M), 2.0) - (l - fabs((m - n)))));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(k, m, n, m_1, l)
    real(8), intent (in) :: k
    real(8), intent (in) :: m
    real(8), intent (in) :: n
    real(8), intent (in) :: m_1
    real(8), intent (in) :: l
    code = cos((((k * (m + n)) / 2.0d0) - m_1)) * exp((-((((m + n) / 2.0d0) - m_1) ** 2.0d0) - (l - abs((m - n)))))
end function

Java

public static double code(double K, double m, double n, double M, double l) {
	return Math.cos((((K * (m + n)) / 2.0) - M)) * Math.exp((-Math.pow((((m + n) / 2.0) - M), 2.0) - (l - Math.abs((m - n)))));
}

Python

def code(K, m, n, M, l):
	return math.cos((((K * (m + n)) / 2.0) - M)) * math.exp((-math.pow((((m + n) / 2.0) - M), 2.0) - (l - math.fabs((m - n)))))

Julia

function code(K, m, n, M, l)
	return Float64(cos(Float64(Float64(Float64(K * Float64(m + n)) / 2.0) - M)) * exp(Float64(Float64(-(Float64(Float64(Float64(m + n) / 2.0) - M) ^ 2.0)) - Float64(l - abs(Float64(m - n))))))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(K, m, n, M, l)
	tmp = cos((((K * (m + n)) / 2.0) - M)) * exp((-((((m + n) / 2.0) - M) ^ 2.0) - (l - abs((m - n)))));
end

Wolfram

code[K_, m_, n_, M_, l_] := N[(N[Cos[N[(N[(N[(K * N[(m + n), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / 2.0), $MachinePrecision] - M), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] * N[Exp[N[((-N[Power[N[(N[(N[(m + n), $MachinePrecision] / 2.0), $MachinePrecision] - M), $MachinePrecision], 2.0], $MachinePrecision]) - N[(l - N[Abs[N[(m - n), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Initial Program: 76.0% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \cos \left(\frac{K \cdot \left(m + n\right)}{2} - M\right) \cdot e^{\left(-{\left(\frac{m + n}{2} - M\right)}^{2}\right) - \left(\ell - \left|m - n\right|\right)} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (K m n M l)
 :precision binary64
 (*
  (cos (- (/ (* K (+ m n)) 2.0) M))
  (exp (- (- (pow (- (/ (+ m n) 2.0) M) 2.0)) (- l (fabs (- m n)))))))

C

double code(double K, double m, double n, double M, double l) {
	return cos((((K * (m + n)) / 2.0) - M)) * exp((-pow((((m + n) / 2.0) - M), 2.0) - (l - fabs((m - n)))));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(k, m, n, m_1, l)
    real(8), intent (in) :: k
    real(8), intent (in) :: m
    real(8), intent (in) :: n
    real(8), intent (in) :: m_1
    real(8), intent (in) :: l
    code = cos((((k * (m + n)) / 2.0d0) - m_1)) * exp((-((((m + n) / 2.0d0) - m_1) ** 2.0d0) - (l - abs((m - n)))))
end function

Java

public static double code(double K, double m, double n, double M, double l) {
	return Math.cos((((K * (m + n)) / 2.0) - M)) * Math.exp((-Math.pow((((m + n) / 2.0) - M), 2.0) - (l - Math.abs((m - n)))));
}

Python

def code(K, m, n, M, l):
	return math.cos((((K * (m + n)) / 2.0) - M)) * math.exp((-math.pow((((m + n) / 2.0) - M), 2.0) - (l - math.fabs((m - n)))))

Julia

function code(K, m, n, M, l)
	return Float64(cos(Float64(Float64(Float64(K * Float64(m + n)) / 2.0) - M)) * exp(Float64(Float64(-(Float64(Float64(Float64(m + n) / 2.0) - M) ^ 2.0)) - Float64(l - abs(Float64(m - n))))))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(K, m, n, M, l)
	tmp = cos((((K * (m + n)) / 2.0) - M)) * exp((-((((m + n) / 2.0) - M) ^ 2.0) - (l - abs((m - n)))));
end

Wolfram

code[K_, m_, n_, M_, l_] := N[(N[Cos[N[(N[(N[(K * N[(m + n), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / 2.0), $MachinePrecision] - M), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] * N[Exp[N[((-N[Power[N[(N[(N[(m + n), $MachinePrecision] / 2.0), $MachinePrecision] - M), $MachinePrecision], 2.0], $MachinePrecision]) - N[(l - N[Abs[N[(m - n), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Alternative 1: 96.5% accurate, 1.1× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \cos M \cdot e^{\left|n - m\right| - \left({\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(0.5, n + m, -M\right)\right)}^{2} + \ell\right)} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (K m n M l)
 :precision binary64
 (* (cos M) (exp (- (fabs (- n m)) (+ (pow (fma 0.5 (+ n m) (- M)) 2.0) l)))))

C

double code(double K, double m, double n, double M, double l) {
	return cos(M) * exp((fabs((n - m)) - (pow(fma(0.5, (n + m), -M), 2.0) + l)));
}

Julia

function code(K, m, n, M, l)
	return Float64(cos(M) * exp(Float64(abs(Float64(n - m)) - Float64((fma(0.5, Float64(n + m), Float64(-M)) ^ 2.0) + l))))
end

Wolfram

code[K_, m_, n_, M_, l_] := N[(N[Cos[M], $MachinePrecision] * N[Exp[N[(N[Abs[N[(n - m), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] - N[(N[Power[N[(0.5 * N[(n + m), $MachinePrecision] + (-M)), $MachinePrecision], 2.0], $MachinePrecision] + l), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 78.7%

   \[\cos \left(\frac{K \cdot \left(m + n\right)}{2} - M\right) \cdot e^{\left(-{\left(\frac{m + n}{2} - M\right)}^{2}\right) - \left(\ell - \left|m - n\right|\right)} \]
2. Add Preprocessing

3. Taylor expanded in K around 0

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\cos \left(\mathsf{neg}\left(M\right)\right) \cdot e^{\left|m - n\right| - \left(\ell + {\left(\frac{1}{2} \cdot \left(m + n\right) - M\right)}^{2}\right)}} \]
4. Step-by-step derivation

   1. *-commutative N/A

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{e^{\left|m - n\right| - \left(\ell + {\left(\frac{1}{2} \cdot \left(m + n\right) - M\right)}^{2}\right)} \cdot \cos \left(\mathsf{neg}\left(M\right)\right)} \]

   2. lower-*.f64 N/A

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{e^{\left|m - n\right| - \left(\ell + {\left(\frac{1}{2} \cdot \left(m + n\right) - M\right)}^{2}\right)} \cdot \cos \left(\mathsf{neg}\left(M\right)\right)} \]

5. Applied rewrites 98.5%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{e^{\left|m - n\right| - \left({\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(0.5, n + m, -M\right)\right)}^{2} + \ell\right)} \cdot \cos M} \]

6. Final simplification 98.5%

   \[\leadsto \cos M \cdot e^{\left|n - m\right| - \left({\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(0.5, n + m, -M\right)\right)}^{2} + \ell\right)} \]
7. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 2: 94.5% accurate, 1.6× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_0 := e^{\left(-M\right) \cdot M} \cdot \cos M\\ \mathbf{if}\;M \leq -2.6 \cdot 10^{+28}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_0\\ \mathbf{elif}\;M \leq 7.6 \cdot 10^{+86}:\\ \;\;\;\;e^{\left|n - m\right| - \mathsf{fma}\left(0.25, {\left(n + m\right)}^{2}, \ell\right)}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_0\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (K m n M l)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_0 (* (exp (* (- M) M)) (cos M))))
   (if (<= M -2.6e+28)
     t_0
     (if (<= M 7.6e+86)
       (exp (- (fabs (- n m)) (fma 0.25 (pow (+ n m) 2.0) l)))
       t_0))))

C

double code(double K, double m, double n, double M, double l) {
	double t_0 = exp((-M * M)) * cos(M);
	double tmp;
	if (M <= -2.6e+28) {
		tmp = t_0;
	} else if (M <= 7.6e+86) {
		tmp = exp((fabs((n - m)) - fma(0.25, pow((n + m), 2.0), l)));
	} else {
		tmp = t_0;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Julia

function code(K, m, n, M, l)
	t_0 = Float64(exp(Float64(Float64(-M) * M)) * cos(M))
	tmp = 0.0
	if (M <= -2.6e+28)
		tmp = t_0;
	elseif (M <= 7.6e+86)
		tmp = exp(Float64(abs(Float64(n - m)) - fma(0.25, (Float64(n + m) ^ 2.0), l)));
	else
		tmp = t_0;
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

code[K_, m_, n_, M_, l_] := Block[{t$95$0 = N[(N[Exp[N[((-M) * M), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] * N[Cos[M], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[M, -2.6e+28], t$95$0, If[LessEqual[M, 7.6e+86], N[Exp[N[(N[Abs[N[(n - m), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] - N[(0.25 * N[Power[N[(n + m), $MachinePrecision], 2.0], $MachinePrecision] + l), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision], t$95$0]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if M < -2.6000000000000002e28 or 7.59999999999999956e86 < M

   1. Initial program 77.5%

      \[\cos \left(\frac{K \cdot \left(m + n\right)}{2} - M\right) \cdot e^{\left(-{\left(\frac{m + n}{2} - M\right)}^{2}\right) - \left(\ell - \left|m - n\right|\right)} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in K around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\cos \left(\mathsf{neg}\left(M\right)\right) \cdot e^{\left|m - n\right| - \left(\ell + {\left(\frac{1}{2} \cdot \left(m + n\right) - M\right)}^{2}\right)}} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{e^{\left|m - n\right| - \left(\ell + {\left(\frac{1}{2} \cdot \left(m + n\right) - M\right)}^{2}\right)} \cdot \cos \left(\mathsf{neg}\left(M\right)\right)} \]

      2. lower-*.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{e^{\left|m - n\right| - \left(\ell + {\left(\frac{1}{2} \cdot \left(m + n\right) - M\right)}^{2}\right)} \cdot \cos \left(\mathsf{neg}\left(M\right)\right)} \]

   5. Applied rewrites 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{e^{\left|m - n\right| - \left({\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(0.5, n + m, -M\right)\right)}^{2} + \ell\right)} \cdot \cos M} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in M around inf

      \[\leadsto e^{-1 \cdot {M}^{2}} \cdot \cos M \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

   8. Applied rewrites 99.0%

      \[\leadsto e^{\left(-M\right) \cdot M} \cdot \cos M \]

   if -2.6000000000000002e28 < M < 7.59999999999999956e86

   1. Initial program 79.5%

      \[\cos \left(\frac{K \cdot \left(m + n\right)}{2} - M\right) \cdot e^{\left(-{\left(\frac{m + n}{2} - M\right)}^{2}\right) - \left(\ell - \left|m - n\right|\right)} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in K around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\cos \left(\mathsf{neg}\left(M\right)\right) \cdot e^{\left|m - n\right| - \left(\ell + {\left(\frac{1}{2} \cdot \left(m + n\right) - M\right)}^{2}\right)}} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{e^{\left|m - n\right| - \left(\ell + {\left(\frac{1}{2} \cdot \left(m + n\right) - M\right)}^{2}\right)} \cdot \cos \left(\mathsf{neg}\left(M\right)\right)} \]

      2. lower-*.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{e^{\left|m - n\right| - \left(\ell + {\left(\frac{1}{2} \cdot \left(m + n\right) - M\right)}^{2}\right)} \cdot \cos \left(\mathsf{neg}\left(M\right)\right)} \]

   5. Applied rewrites 97.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{e^{\left|m - n\right| - \left({\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(0.5, n + m, -M\right)\right)}^{2} + \ell\right)} \cdot \cos M} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in M around 0

      \[\leadsto e^{\left|m - n\right| - \left(\ell + \frac{1}{4} \cdot {\left(m + n\right)}^{2}\right)} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

   8. Applied rewrites 96.3%

      \[\leadsto e^{\left|m - n\right| - \mathsf{fma}\left(0.25, {\left(n + m\right)}^{2}, \ell\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 97.4%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;M \leq -2.6 \cdot 10^{+28}:\\ \;\;\;\;e^{\left(-M\right) \cdot M} \cdot \cos M\\ \mathbf{elif}\;M \leq 7.6 \cdot 10^{+86}:\\ \;\;\;\;e^{\left|n - m\right| - \mathsf{fma}\left(0.25, {\left(n + m\right)}^{2}, \ell\right)}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;e^{\left(-M\right) \cdot M} \cdot \cos M\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 3: 73.6% accurate, 2.8× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;m \leq -54:\\ \;\;\;\;e^{-0.25 \cdot \left(m \cdot m\right)}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;e^{\left|n - m\right| - \mathsf{fma}\left(0.25, n \cdot n, \ell\right)}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (K m n M l)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= m -54.0)
   (exp (* -0.25 (* m m)))
   (exp (- (fabs (- n m)) (fma 0.25 (* n n) l)))))

C

double code(double K, double m, double n, double M, double l) {
	double tmp;
	if (m <= -54.0) {
		tmp = exp((-0.25 * (m * m)));
	} else {
		tmp = exp((fabs((n - m)) - fma(0.25, (n * n), l)));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Julia

function code(K, m, n, M, l)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (m <= -54.0)
		tmp = exp(Float64(-0.25 * Float64(m * m)));
	else
		tmp = exp(Float64(abs(Float64(n - m)) - fma(0.25, Float64(n * n), l)));
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

code[K_, m_, n_, M_, l_] := If[LessEqual[m, -54.0], N[Exp[N[(-0.25 * N[(m * m), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision], N[Exp[N[(N[Abs[N[(n - m), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] - N[(0.25 * N[(n * n), $MachinePrecision] + l), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if m < -54

   1. Initial program 75.8%

      \[\cos \left(\frac{K \cdot \left(m + n\right)}{2} - M\right) \cdot e^{\left(-{\left(\frac{m + n}{2} - M\right)}^{2}\right) - \left(\ell - \left|m - n\right|\right)} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in K around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\cos \left(\mathsf{neg}\left(M\right)\right) \cdot e^{\left|m - n\right| - \left(\ell + {\left(\frac{1}{2} \cdot \left(m + n\right) - M\right)}^{2}\right)}} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{e^{\left|m - n\right| - \left(\ell + {\left(\frac{1}{2} \cdot \left(m + n\right) - M\right)}^{2}\right)} \cdot \cos \left(\mathsf{neg}\left(M\right)\right)} \]

      2. lower-*.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{e^{\left|m - n\right| - \left(\ell + {\left(\frac{1}{2} \cdot \left(m + n\right) - M\right)}^{2}\right)} \cdot \cos \left(\mathsf{neg}\left(M\right)\right)} \]

   5. Applied rewrites 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{e^{\left|m - n\right| - \left({\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(0.5, n + m, -M\right)\right)}^{2} + \ell\right)} \cdot \cos M} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in M around 0

      \[\leadsto e^{\left|m - n\right| - \left(\ell + \frac{1}{4} \cdot {\left(m + n\right)}^{2}\right)} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

   8. Applied rewrites 100.0%

      \[\leadsto e^{\left|m - n\right| - \mathsf{fma}\left(0.25, {\left(n + m\right)}^{2}, \ell\right)} \]

   9. Taylor expanded in m around inf

      \[\leadsto e^{\frac{-1}{4} \cdot {m}^{2}} \]
   10. Step-by-step derivation

   11. Applied rewrites 97.0%

       \[\leadsto e^{\left(m \cdot m\right) \cdot -0.25} \]

   if -54 < m

   1. Initial program 79.7%

      \[\cos \left(\frac{K \cdot \left(m + n\right)}{2} - M\right) \cdot e^{\left(-{\left(\frac{m + n}{2} - M\right)}^{2}\right) - \left(\ell - \left|m - n\right|\right)} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in K around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\cos \left(\mathsf{neg}\left(M\right)\right) \cdot e^{\left|m - n\right| - \left(\ell + {\left(\frac{1}{2} \cdot \left(m + n\right) - M\right)}^{2}\right)}} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{e^{\left|m - n\right| - \left(\ell + {\left(\frac{1}{2} \cdot \left(m + n\right) - M\right)}^{2}\right)} \cdot \cos \left(\mathsf{neg}\left(M\right)\right)} \]

      2. lower-*.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{e^{\left|m - n\right| - \left(\ell + {\left(\frac{1}{2} \cdot \left(m + n\right) - M\right)}^{2}\right)} \cdot \cos \left(\mathsf{neg}\left(M\right)\right)} \]

   5. Applied rewrites 97.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{e^{\left|m - n\right| - \left({\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(0.5, n + m, -M\right)\right)}^{2} + \ell\right)} \cdot \cos M} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in M around 0

      \[\leadsto e^{\left|m - n\right| - \left(\ell + \frac{1}{4} \cdot {\left(m + n\right)}^{2}\right)} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

   8. Applied rewrites 85.7%

      \[\leadsto e^{\left|m - n\right| - \mathsf{fma}\left(0.25, {\left(n + m\right)}^{2}, \ell\right)} \]

   9. Taylor expanded in m around 0

      \[\leadsto e^{\left|m - n\right| - \mathsf{fma}\left(\frac{1}{4}, {n}^{2}, \ell\right)} \]
   10. Step-by-step derivation

   11. Applied rewrites 70.7%

       \[\leadsto e^{\left|m - n\right| - \mathsf{fma}\left(0.25, n \cdot n, \ell\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 77.5%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;m \leq -54:\\ \;\;\;\;e^{-0.25 \cdot \left(m \cdot m\right)}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;e^{\left|n - m\right| - \mathsf{fma}\left(0.25, n \cdot n, \ell\right)}\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 4: 68.5% accurate, 2.9× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_0 := e^{\left(-0.25 \cdot n\right) \cdot n}\\ \mathbf{if}\;n \leq -31:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_0\\ \mathbf{elif}\;n \leq 54:\\ \;\;\;\;e^{-\ell}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_0\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (K m n M l)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_0 (exp (* (* -0.25 n) n))))
   (if (<= n -31.0) t_0 (if (<= n 54.0) (exp (- l)) t_0))))

C

double code(double K, double m, double n, double M, double l) {
	double t_0 = exp(((-0.25 * n) * n));
	double tmp;
	if (n <= -31.0) {
		tmp = t_0;
	} else if (n <= 54.0) {
		tmp = exp(-l);
	} else {
		tmp = t_0;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(k, m, n, m_1, l)
    real(8), intent (in) :: k
    real(8), intent (in) :: m
    real(8), intent (in) :: n
    real(8), intent (in) :: m_1
    real(8), intent (in) :: l
    real(8) :: t_0
    real(8) :: tmp
    t_0 = exp((((-0.25d0) * n) * n))
    if (n <= (-31.0d0)) then
        tmp = t_0
    else if (n <= 54.0d0) then
        tmp = exp(-l)
    else
        tmp = t_0
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double K, double m, double n, double M, double l) {
	double t_0 = Math.exp(((-0.25 * n) * n));
	double tmp;
	if (n <= -31.0) {
		tmp = t_0;
	} else if (n <= 54.0) {
		tmp = Math.exp(-l);
	} else {
		tmp = t_0;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(K, m, n, M, l):
	t_0 = math.exp(((-0.25 * n) * n))
	tmp = 0
	if n <= -31.0:
		tmp = t_0
	elif n <= 54.0:
		tmp = math.exp(-l)
	else:
		tmp = t_0
	return tmp

Julia

function code(K, m, n, M, l)
	t_0 = exp(Float64(Float64(-0.25 * n) * n))
	tmp = 0.0
	if (n <= -31.0)
		tmp = t_0;
	elseif (n <= 54.0)
		tmp = exp(Float64(-l));
	else
		tmp = t_0;
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(K, m, n, M, l)
	t_0 = exp(((-0.25 * n) * n));
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (n <= -31.0)
		tmp = t_0;
	elseif (n <= 54.0)
		tmp = exp(-l);
	else
		tmp = t_0;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[K_, m_, n_, M_, l_] := Block[{t$95$0 = N[Exp[N[(N[(-0.25 * n), $MachinePrecision] * n), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[n, -31.0], t$95$0, If[LessEqual[n, 54.0], N[Exp[(-l)], $MachinePrecision], t$95$0]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if n < -31 or 54 < n

   1. Initial program 73.3%

      \[\cos \left(\frac{K \cdot \left(m + n\right)}{2} - M\right) \cdot e^{\left(-{\left(\frac{m + n}{2} - M\right)}^{2}\right) - \left(\ell - \left|m - n\right|\right)} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in K around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\cos \left(\mathsf{neg}\left(M\right)\right) \cdot e^{\left|m - n\right| - \left(\ell + {\left(\frac{1}{2} \cdot \left(m + n\right) - M\right)}^{2}\right)}} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{e^{\left|m - n\right| - \left(\ell + {\left(\frac{1}{2} \cdot \left(m + n\right) - M\right)}^{2}\right)} \cdot \cos \left(\mathsf{neg}\left(M\right)\right)} \]

      2. lower-*.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{e^{\left|m - n\right| - \left(\ell + {\left(\frac{1}{2} \cdot \left(m + n\right) - M\right)}^{2}\right)} \cdot \cos \left(\mathsf{neg}\left(M\right)\right)} \]

   5. Applied rewrites 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{e^{\left|m - n\right| - \left({\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(0.5, n + m, -M\right)\right)}^{2} + \ell\right)} \cdot \cos M} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in M around 0

      \[\leadsto e^{\left|m - n\right| - \left(\ell + \frac{1}{4} \cdot {\left(m + n\right)}^{2}\right)} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

   8. Applied rewrites 97.7%

      \[\leadsto e^{\left|m - n\right| - \mathsf{fma}\left(0.25, {\left(n + m\right)}^{2}, \ell\right)} \]

   9. Taylor expanded in n around inf

      \[\leadsto e^{\frac{-1}{4} \cdot {n}^{2}} \]
   10. Step-by-step derivation

   11. Applied rewrites 97.0%

       \[\leadsto e^{\left(-0.25 \cdot n\right) \cdot n} \]

   if -31 < n < 54

   1. Initial program 84.4%

      \[\cos \left(\frac{K \cdot \left(m + n\right)}{2} - M\right) \cdot e^{\left(-{\left(\frac{m + n}{2} - M\right)}^{2}\right) - \left(\ell - \left|m - n\right|\right)} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in K around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\cos \left(\mathsf{neg}\left(M\right)\right) \cdot e^{\left|m - n\right| - \left(\ell + {\left(\frac{1}{2} \cdot \left(m + n\right) - M\right)}^{2}\right)}} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{e^{\left|m - n\right| - \left(\ell + {\left(\frac{1}{2} \cdot \left(m + n\right) - M\right)}^{2}\right)} \cdot \cos \left(\mathsf{neg}\left(M\right)\right)} \]

      2. lower-*.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{e^{\left|m - n\right| - \left(\ell + {\left(\frac{1}{2} \cdot \left(m + n\right) - M\right)}^{2}\right)} \cdot \cos \left(\mathsf{neg}\left(M\right)\right)} \]

   5. Applied rewrites 96.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{e^{\left|m - n\right| - \left({\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(0.5, n + m, -M\right)\right)}^{2} + \ell\right)} \cdot \cos M} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in M around 0

      \[\leadsto e^{\left|m - n\right| - \left(\ell + \frac{1}{4} \cdot {\left(m + n\right)}^{2}\right)} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

   8. Applied rewrites 80.7%

      \[\leadsto e^{\left|m - n\right| - \mathsf{fma}\left(0.25, {\left(n + m\right)}^{2}, \ell\right)} \]

   9. Taylor expanded in l around inf

      \[\leadsto e^{-1 \cdot \ell} \]
   10. Step-by-step derivation

   11. Applied rewrites 45.9%

       \[\leadsto e^{-\ell} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 5: 65.6% accurate, 3.1× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;n \leq 55:\\ \;\;\;\;e^{-0.25 \cdot \left(m \cdot m\right)}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;e^{\left(-0.25 \cdot n\right) \cdot n}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (K m n M l)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= n 55.0) (exp (* -0.25 (* m m))) (exp (* (* -0.25 n) n))))

C

double code(double K, double m, double n, double M, double l) {
	double tmp;
	if (n <= 55.0) {
		tmp = exp((-0.25 * (m * m)));
	} else {
		tmp = exp(((-0.25 * n) * n));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(k, m, n, m_1, l)
    real(8), intent (in) :: k
    real(8), intent (in) :: m
    real(8), intent (in) :: n
    real(8), intent (in) :: m_1
    real(8), intent (in) :: l
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (n <= 55.0d0) then
        tmp = exp(((-0.25d0) * (m * m)))
    else
        tmp = exp((((-0.25d0) * n) * n))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double K, double m, double n, double M, double l) {
	double tmp;
	if (n <= 55.0) {
		tmp = Math.exp((-0.25 * (m * m)));
	} else {
		tmp = Math.exp(((-0.25 * n) * n));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(K, m, n, M, l):
	tmp = 0
	if n <= 55.0:
		tmp = math.exp((-0.25 * (m * m)))
	else:
		tmp = math.exp(((-0.25 * n) * n))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(K, m, n, M, l)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (n <= 55.0)
		tmp = exp(Float64(-0.25 * Float64(m * m)));
	else
		tmp = exp(Float64(Float64(-0.25 * n) * n));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(K, m, n, M, l)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (n <= 55.0)
		tmp = exp((-0.25 * (m * m)));
	else
		tmp = exp(((-0.25 * n) * n));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[K_, m_, n_, M_, l_] := If[LessEqual[n, 55.0], N[Exp[N[(-0.25 * N[(m * m), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision], N[Exp[N[(N[(-0.25 * n), $MachinePrecision] * n), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if n < 55

   1. Initial program 80.1%

      \[\cos \left(\frac{K \cdot \left(m + n\right)}{2} - M\right) \cdot e^{\left(-{\left(\frac{m + n}{2} - M\right)}^{2}\right) - \left(\ell - \left|m - n\right|\right)} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in K around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\cos \left(\mathsf{neg}\left(M\right)\right) \cdot e^{\left|m - n\right| - \left(\ell + {\left(\frac{1}{2} \cdot \left(m + n\right) - M\right)}^{2}\right)}} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{e^{\left|m - n\right| - \left(\ell + {\left(\frac{1}{2} \cdot \left(m + n\right) - M\right)}^{2}\right)} \cdot \cos \left(\mathsf{neg}\left(M\right)\right)} \]

      2. lower-*.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{e^{\left|m - n\right| - \left(\ell + {\left(\frac{1}{2} \cdot \left(m + n\right) - M\right)}^{2}\right)} \cdot \cos \left(\mathsf{neg}\left(M\right)\right)} \]

   5. Applied rewrites 97.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{e^{\left|m - n\right| - \left({\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(0.5, n + m, -M\right)\right)}^{2} + \ell\right)} \cdot \cos M} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in M around 0

      \[\leadsto e^{\left|m - n\right| - \left(\ell + \frac{1}{4} \cdot {\left(m + n\right)}^{2}\right)} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

   8. Applied rewrites 87.2%

      \[\leadsto e^{\left|m - n\right| - \mathsf{fma}\left(0.25, {\left(n + m\right)}^{2}, \ell\right)} \]

   9. Taylor expanded in m around inf

      \[\leadsto e^{\frac{-1}{4} \cdot {m}^{2}} \]
   10. Step-by-step derivation

   11. Applied rewrites 55.6%

       \[\leadsto e^{\left(m \cdot m\right) \cdot -0.25} \]

   if 55 < n

   1. Initial program 74.6%

      \[\cos \left(\frac{K \cdot \left(m + n\right)}{2} - M\right) \cdot e^{\left(-{\left(\frac{m + n}{2} - M\right)}^{2}\right) - \left(\ell - \left|m - n\right|\right)} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in K around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\cos \left(\mathsf{neg}\left(M\right)\right) \cdot e^{\left|m - n\right| - \left(\ell + {\left(\frac{1}{2} \cdot \left(m + n\right) - M\right)}^{2}\right)}} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{e^{\left|m - n\right| - \left(\ell + {\left(\frac{1}{2} \cdot \left(m + n\right) - M\right)}^{2}\right)} \cdot \cos \left(\mathsf{neg}\left(M\right)\right)} \]

      2. lower-*.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{e^{\left|m - n\right| - \left(\ell + {\left(\frac{1}{2} \cdot \left(m + n\right) - M\right)}^{2}\right)} \cdot \cos \left(\mathsf{neg}\left(M\right)\right)} \]

   5. Applied rewrites 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{e^{\left|m - n\right| - \left({\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(0.5, n + m, -M\right)\right)}^{2} + \ell\right)} \cdot \cos M} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in M around 0

      \[\leadsto e^{\left|m - n\right| - \left(\ell + \frac{1}{4} \cdot {\left(m + n\right)}^{2}\right)} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

   8. Applied rewrites 95.6%

      \[\leadsto e^{\left|m - n\right| - \mathsf{fma}\left(0.25, {\left(n + m\right)}^{2}, \ell\right)} \]

   9. Taylor expanded in n around inf

      \[\leadsto e^{\frac{-1}{4} \cdot {n}^{2}} \]
   10. Step-by-step derivation

   11. Applied rewrites 95.6%

       \[\leadsto e^{\left(-0.25 \cdot n\right) \cdot n} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 66.1%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;n \leq 55:\\ \;\;\;\;e^{-0.25 \cdot \left(m \cdot m\right)}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;e^{\left(-0.25 \cdot n\right) \cdot n}\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 6: 36.1% accurate, 3.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ e^{-\ell} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (K m n M l) :precision binary64 (exp (- l)))

C

double code(double K, double m, double n, double M, double l) {
	return exp(-l);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(k, m, n, m_1, l)
    real(8), intent (in) :: k
    real(8), intent (in) :: m
    real(8), intent (in) :: n
    real(8), intent (in) :: m_1
    real(8), intent (in) :: l
    code = exp(-l)
end function

Java

public static double code(double K, double m, double n, double M, double l) {
	return Math.exp(-l);
}

Python

def code(K, m, n, M, l):
	return math.exp(-l)

Julia

function code(K, m, n, M, l)
	return exp(Float64(-l))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(K, m, n, M, l)
	tmp = exp(-l);
end

Wolfram

code[K_, m_, n_, M_, l_] := N[Exp[(-l)], $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 78.7%

   \[\cos \left(\frac{K \cdot \left(m + n\right)}{2} - M\right) \cdot e^{\left(-{\left(\frac{m + n}{2} - M\right)}^{2}\right) - \left(\ell - \left|m - n\right|\right)} \]
2. Add Preprocessing

3. Taylor expanded in K around 0

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\cos \left(\mathsf{neg}\left(M\right)\right) \cdot e^{\left|m - n\right| - \left(\ell + {\left(\frac{1}{2} \cdot \left(m + n\right) - M\right)}^{2}\right)}} \]
4. Step-by-step derivation

   1. *-commutative N/A

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{e^{\left|m - n\right| - \left(\ell + {\left(\frac{1}{2} \cdot \left(m + n\right) - M\right)}^{2}\right)} \cdot \cos \left(\mathsf{neg}\left(M\right)\right)} \]

   2. lower-*.f64 N/A

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{e^{\left|m - n\right| - \left(\ell + {\left(\frac{1}{2} \cdot \left(m + n\right) - M\right)}^{2}\right)} \cdot \cos \left(\mathsf{neg}\left(M\right)\right)} \]

5. Applied rewrites 98.5%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{e^{\left|m - n\right| - \left({\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(0.5, n + m, -M\right)\right)}^{2} + \ell\right)} \cdot \cos M} \]

6. Taylor expanded in M around 0

   \[\leadsto e^{\left|m - n\right| - \left(\ell + \frac{1}{4} \cdot {\left(m + n\right)}^{2}\right)} \]
7. Step-by-step derivation

8. Applied rewrites 89.4%

   \[\leadsto e^{\left|m - n\right| - \mathsf{fma}\left(0.25, {\left(n + m\right)}^{2}, \ell\right)} \]

9. Taylor expanded in l around inf

   \[\leadsto e^{-1 \cdot \ell} \]
10. Step-by-step derivation

11. Applied rewrites 36.0%

    \[\leadsto e^{-\ell} \]
12. Add Preprocessing

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2024332 
(FPCore (K m n M l)
  :name "Maksimov and Kolovsky, Equation (32)"
  :precision binary64
  (* (cos (- (/ (* K (+ m n)) 2.0) M)) (exp (- (- (pow (- (/ (+ m n) 2.0) M) 2.0)) (- l (fabs (- m n)))))))