Graphics.Rendering.Plot.Render.Plot.Legend:renderLegendOutside from plot-0.2.3.4, B

Percentage Accurate: 99.8% → 99.9%

Time: 7.8s

Alternatives: 11

Speedup: 1.2×

• 27.0% of points produce a very large (infinite) output. You may want to add a precondition.

Specification

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x \cdot \left(\left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) + t\right) + y \cdot 5 \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (+ (* x (+ (+ (+ (+ y z) z) y) t)) (* y 5.0)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return (x * ((((y + z) + z) + y) + t)) + (y * 5.0);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = (x * ((((y + z) + z) + y) + t)) + (y * 5.0d0)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return (x * ((((y + z) + z) + y) + t)) + (y * 5.0);
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return (x * ((((y + z) + z) + y) + t)) + (y * 5.0)

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(Float64(x * Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(y + z) + z) + y) + t)) + Float64(y * 5.0))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = (x * ((((y + z) + z) + y) + t)) + (y * 5.0);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(N[(x * N[(N[(N[(N[(y + z), $MachinePrecision] + z), $MachinePrecision] + y), $MachinePrecision] + t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(y * 5.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Initial Program: 99.8% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x \cdot \left(\left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) + t\right) + y \cdot 5 \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (+ (* x (+ (+ (+ (+ y z) z) y) t)) (* y 5.0)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return (x * ((((y + z) + z) + y) + t)) + (y * 5.0);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = (x * ((((y + z) + z) + y) + t)) + (y * 5.0d0)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return (x * ((((y + z) + z) + y) + t)) + (y * 5.0);
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return (x * ((((y + z) + z) + y) + t)) + (y * 5.0)

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(Float64(x * Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(y + z) + z) + y) + t)) + Float64(y * 5.0))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = (x * ((((y + z) + z) + y) + t)) + (y * 5.0);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(N[(x * N[(N[(N[(N[(y + z), $MachinePrecision] + z), $MachinePrecision] + y), $MachinePrecision] + t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(y * 5.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Alternative 1: 99.9% accurate, 1.2× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \mathsf{fma}\left(y, 5, \mathsf{fma}\left(2, z + y, t\right) \cdot x\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t) :precision binary64 (fma y 5.0 (* (fma 2.0 (+ z y) t) x)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return fma(y, 5.0, (fma(2.0, (z + y), t) * x));
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return fma(y, 5.0, Float64(fma(2.0, Float64(z + y), t) * x))
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(y * 5.0 + N[(N[(2.0 * N[(z + y), $MachinePrecision] + t), $MachinePrecision] * x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 100.0%

   \[x \cdot \left(\left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) + t\right) + y \cdot 5 \]
2. Add Preprocessing
3. Step-by-step derivation

   1. lift-+.f64 N/A

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(\left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) + t\right) + y \cdot 5} \]

   2. +-commutative N/A

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot 5 + x \cdot \left(\left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) + t\right)} \]

   3. lift-*.f64 N/A

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot 5} + x \cdot \left(\left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) + t\right) \]

   4. lower-fma.f64 100.0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, 5, x \cdot \left(\left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) + t\right)\right)} \]

   5. lift-*.f64 N/A

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, 5, \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(\left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) + t\right)}\right) \]

   6. *-commutative N/A

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, 5, \color{blue}{\left(\left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) + t\right) \cdot x}\right) \]

   7. lower-*.f64 100.0

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, 5, \color{blue}{\left(\left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) + t\right) \cdot x}\right) \]

   8. lift-+.f64 N/A

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, 5, \color{blue}{\left(\left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) + t\right)} \cdot x\right) \]

   9. lift-+.f64 N/A

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, 5, \left(\color{blue}{\left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right)} + t\right) \cdot x\right) \]

   10. lift-+.f64 N/A

       \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, 5, \left(\left(\color{blue}{\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right)} + y\right) + t\right) \cdot x\right) \]

   11. associate-+l+ N/A

       \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, 5, \left(\color{blue}{\left(\left(y + z\right) + \left(z + y\right)\right)} + t\right) \cdot x\right) \]

   12. +-commutative N/A

       \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, 5, \left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + \color{blue}{\left(y + z\right)}\right) + t\right) \cdot x\right) \]

   13. lift-+.f64 N/A

       \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, 5, \left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + \color{blue}{\left(y + z\right)}\right) + t\right) \cdot x\right) \]

   14. count-2 N/A

       \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, 5, \left(\color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(y + z\right)} + t\right) \cdot x\right) \]

   15. lower-fma.f64 100.0

       \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, 5, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(2, y + z, t\right)} \cdot x\right) \]

   16. lift-+.f64 N/A

       \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, 5, \mathsf{fma}\left(2, \color{blue}{y + z}, t\right) \cdot x\right) \]

   17. +-commutative N/A

       \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, 5, \mathsf{fma}\left(2, \color{blue}{z + y}, t\right) \cdot x\right) \]

   18. lower-+.f64 100.0

       \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, 5, \mathsf{fma}\left(2, \color{blue}{z + y}, t\right) \cdot x\right) \]

4. Applied rewrites 100.0%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, 5, \mathsf{fma}\left(2, z + y, t\right) \cdot x\right)} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 2: 51.8% accurate, 0.7× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_1 := \mathsf{fma}\left(2, x, 5\right) \cdot y\\ \mathbf{if}\;t \leq -3.7 \cdot 10^{+146}:\\ \;\;\;\;t \cdot x\\ \mathbf{elif}\;t \leq -9.5 \cdot 10^{-34}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_1\\ \mathbf{elif}\;t \leq 7 \cdot 10^{-222}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(z \cdot x\right) \cdot 2\\ \mathbf{elif}\;t \leq 1.15 \cdot 10^{+206}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_1\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;t \cdot x\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_1 (* (fma 2.0 x 5.0) y)))
   (if (<= t -3.7e+146)
     (* t x)
     (if (<= t -9.5e-34)
       t_1
       (if (<= t 7e-222) (* (* z x) 2.0) (if (<= t 1.15e+206) t_1 (* t x)))))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double t_1 = fma(2.0, x, 5.0) * y;
	double tmp;
	if (t <= -3.7e+146) {
		tmp = t * x;
	} else if (t <= -9.5e-34) {
		tmp = t_1;
	} else if (t <= 7e-222) {
		tmp = (z * x) * 2.0;
	} else if (t <= 1.15e+206) {
		tmp = t_1;
	} else {
		tmp = t * x;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	t_1 = Float64(fma(2.0, x, 5.0) * y)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (t <= -3.7e+146)
		tmp = Float64(t * x);
	elseif (t <= -9.5e-34)
		tmp = t_1;
	elseif (t <= 7e-222)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(z * x) * 2.0);
	elseif (t <= 1.15e+206)
		tmp = t_1;
	else
		tmp = Float64(t * x);
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := Block[{t$95$1 = N[(N[(2.0 * x + 5.0), $MachinePrecision] * y), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[t, -3.7e+146], N[(t * x), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[t, -9.5e-34], t$95$1, If[LessEqual[t, 7e-222], N[(N[(z * x), $MachinePrecision] * 2.0), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[t, 1.15e+206], t$95$1, N[(t * x), $MachinePrecision]]]]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if t < -3.70000000000000004e146 or 1.15000000000000008e206 < t

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[x \cdot \left(\left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) + t\right) + y \cdot 5 \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in t around inf

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{t \cdot x} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. lower-*.f64 86.7

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{t \cdot x} \]

   5. Applied rewrites 86.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{t \cdot x} \]

   if -3.70000000000000004e146 < t < -9.49999999999999985e-34 or 7.00000000000000049e-222 < t < 1.15000000000000008e206

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[x \cdot \left(\left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) + t\right) + y \cdot 5 \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in y around inf

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(5 + 2 \cdot x\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(5 + 2 \cdot x\right) \cdot y} \]

      2. lower-*.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(5 + 2 \cdot x\right) \cdot y} \]

      3. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(2 \cdot x + 5\right)} \cdot y \]

      4. lower-fma.f64 59.1

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(2, x, 5\right)} \cdot y \]

   5. Applied rewrites 59.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(2, x, 5\right) \cdot y} \]

   if -9.49999999999999985e-34 < t < 7.00000000000000049e-222

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[x \cdot \left(\left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) + t\right) + y \cdot 5 \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in z around inf

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(x \cdot z\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot z\right) \cdot 2} \]

      2. lower-*.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot z\right) \cdot 2} \]

      3. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(z \cdot x\right)} \cdot 2 \]

      4. lower-*.f64 57.4

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(z \cdot x\right)} \cdot 2 \]

   5. Applied rewrites 57.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(z \cdot x\right) \cdot 2} \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.
4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 3: 73.5% accurate, 0.8× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_1 := \mathsf{fma}\left(2, z, t\right) \cdot x\\ \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -3.6 \cdot 10^{-83}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_1\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \leq 8.2 \cdot 10^{-47}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(y, 5, \left(z + z\right) \cdot x\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \leq 1.25 \cdot 10^{+159}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_1\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(\left(z + y\right) \cdot x\right) \cdot 2\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_1 (* (fma 2.0 z t) x)))
   (if (<= x -3.6e-83)
     t_1
     (if (<= x 8.2e-47)
       (fma y 5.0 (* (+ z z) x))
       (if (<= x 1.25e+159) t_1 (* (* (+ z y) x) 2.0))))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double t_1 = fma(2.0, z, t) * x;
	double tmp;
	if (x <= -3.6e-83) {
		tmp = t_1;
	} else if (x <= 8.2e-47) {
		tmp = fma(y, 5.0, ((z + z) * x));
	} else if (x <= 1.25e+159) {
		tmp = t_1;
	} else {
		tmp = ((z + y) * x) * 2.0;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	t_1 = Float64(fma(2.0, z, t) * x)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (x <= -3.6e-83)
		tmp = t_1;
	elseif (x <= 8.2e-47)
		tmp = fma(y, 5.0, Float64(Float64(z + z) * x));
	elseif (x <= 1.25e+159)
		tmp = t_1;
	else
		tmp = Float64(Float64(Float64(z + y) * x) * 2.0);
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := Block[{t$95$1 = N[(N[(2.0 * z + t), $MachinePrecision] * x), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[x, -3.6e-83], t$95$1, If[LessEqual[x, 8.2e-47], N[(y * 5.0 + N[(N[(z + z), $MachinePrecision] * x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[x, 1.25e+159], t$95$1, N[(N[(N[(z + y), $MachinePrecision] * x), $MachinePrecision] * 2.0), $MachinePrecision]]]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if x < -3.60000000000000012e-83 or 8.20000000000000003e-47 < x < 1.25000000000000001e159

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[x \cdot \left(\left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) + t\right) + y \cdot 5 \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in y around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(t + 2 \cdot z\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(t + 2 \cdot z\right) \cdot x} \]

      2. lower-*.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(t + 2 \cdot z\right) \cdot x} \]

      3. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(2 \cdot z + t\right)} \cdot x \]

      4. lower-fma.f64 80.2

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(2, z, t\right)} \cdot x \]

   5. Applied rewrites 80.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(2, z, t\right) \cdot x} \]

   if -3.60000000000000012e-83 < x < 8.20000000000000003e-47

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[x \cdot \left(\left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) + t\right) + y \cdot 5 \]
   2. Add Preprocessing
   3. Step-by-step derivation

      1. lift-+.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(\left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) + t\right) + y \cdot 5} \]

      2. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot 5 + x \cdot \left(\left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) + t\right)} \]

      3. lift-*.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot 5} + x \cdot \left(\left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) + t\right) \]

      4. lower-fma.f64 100.0

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, 5, x \cdot \left(\left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) + t\right)\right)} \]

      5. lift-*.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, 5, \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(\left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) + t\right)}\right) \]

      6. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, 5, \color{blue}{\left(\left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) + t\right) \cdot x}\right) \]

      7. lower-*.f64 100.0

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, 5, \color{blue}{\left(\left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) + t\right) \cdot x}\right) \]

      8. lift-+.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, 5, \color{blue}{\left(\left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) + t\right)} \cdot x\right) \]

      9. lift-+.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, 5, \left(\color{blue}{\left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right)} + t\right) \cdot x\right) \]

      10. lift-+.f64 N/A

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, 5, \left(\left(\color{blue}{\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right)} + y\right) + t\right) \cdot x\right) \]

      11. associate-+l+ N/A

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, 5, \left(\color{blue}{\left(\left(y + z\right) + \left(z + y\right)\right)} + t\right) \cdot x\right) \]

      12. +-commutative N/A

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, 5, \left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + \color{blue}{\left(y + z\right)}\right) + t\right) \cdot x\right) \]

      13. lift-+.f64 N/A

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, 5, \left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + \color{blue}{\left(y + z\right)}\right) + t\right) \cdot x\right) \]

      14. count-2 N/A

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, 5, \left(\color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(y + z\right)} + t\right) \cdot x\right) \]

      15. lower-fma.f64 100.0

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, 5, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(2, y + z, t\right)} \cdot x\right) \]

      16. lift-+.f64 N/A

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, 5, \mathsf{fma}\left(2, \color{blue}{y + z}, t\right) \cdot x\right) \]

      17. +-commutative N/A

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, 5, \mathsf{fma}\left(2, \color{blue}{z + y}, t\right) \cdot x\right) \]

      18. lower-+.f64 100.0

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, 5, \mathsf{fma}\left(2, \color{blue}{z + y}, t\right) \cdot x\right) \]

   4. Applied rewrites 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, 5, \mathsf{fma}\left(2, z + y, t\right) \cdot x\right)} \]

   5. Taylor expanded in z around inf

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, 5, \color{blue}{\left(2 \cdot z\right)} \cdot x\right) \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. lower-*.f64 83.2

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, 5, \color{blue}{\left(2 \cdot z\right)} \cdot x\right) \]

   7. Applied rewrites 83.2%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, 5, \color{blue}{\left(2 \cdot z\right)} \cdot x\right) \]
   8. Step-by-step derivation

   9. Applied rewrites 83.2%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, 5, \left(z + \color{blue}{z}\right) \cdot x\right) \]

   if 1.25000000000000001e159 < x

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[x \cdot \left(\left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) + t\right) + y \cdot 5 \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in t around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{5 \cdot y + x \cdot \left(2 \cdot y + 2 \cdot z\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(2 \cdot y + 2 \cdot z\right) + 5 \cdot y} \]

      2. distribute-lft-out N/A

         \[\leadsto x \cdot \color{blue}{\left(2 \cdot \left(y + z\right)\right)} + 5 \cdot y \]

      3. associate-*r* N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot 2\right) \cdot \left(y + z\right)} + 5 \cdot y \]

      4. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(2 \cdot x\right)} \cdot \left(y + z\right) + 5 \cdot y \]

      5. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(2 \cdot x, y + z, 5 \cdot y\right)} \]

      6. lower-*.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{2 \cdot x}, y + z, 5 \cdot y\right) \]

      7. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(2 \cdot x, \color{blue}{z + y}, 5 \cdot y\right) \]

      8. lower-+.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(2 \cdot x, \color{blue}{z + y}, 5 \cdot y\right) \]

      9. lower-*.f64 83.9

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(2 \cdot x, z + y, \color{blue}{5 \cdot y}\right) \]

   5. Applied rewrites 83.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(2 \cdot x, z + y, 5 \cdot y\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in x around inf

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot \left(y + z\right)\right)} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

   8. Applied rewrites 83.9%

      \[\leadsto \left(\left(z + y\right) \cdot x\right) \cdot \color{blue}{2} \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.
4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 4: 90.9% accurate, 0.8× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;t \leq -7 \cdot 10^{+14}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(y, 5, \mathsf{fma}\left(2, z, t\right) \cdot x\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;t \leq 5.8 \cdot 10^{+97}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(2 \cdot x, z + y, 5 \cdot y\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(2, y, t\right), x, 5 \cdot y\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= t -7e+14)
   (fma y 5.0 (* (fma 2.0 z t) x))
   (if (<= t 5.8e+97)
     (fma (* 2.0 x) (+ z y) (* 5.0 y))
     (fma (fma 2.0 y t) x (* 5.0 y)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (t <= -7e+14) {
		tmp = fma(y, 5.0, (fma(2.0, z, t) * x));
	} else if (t <= 5.8e+97) {
		tmp = fma((2.0 * x), (z + y), (5.0 * y));
	} else {
		tmp = fma(fma(2.0, y, t), x, (5.0 * y));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (t <= -7e+14)
		tmp = fma(y, 5.0, Float64(fma(2.0, z, t) * x));
	elseif (t <= 5.8e+97)
		tmp = fma(Float64(2.0 * x), Float64(z + y), Float64(5.0 * y));
	else
		tmp = fma(fma(2.0, y, t), x, Float64(5.0 * y));
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := If[LessEqual[t, -7e+14], N[(y * 5.0 + N[(N[(2.0 * z + t), $MachinePrecision] * x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[t, 5.8e+97], N[(N[(2.0 * x), $MachinePrecision] * N[(z + y), $MachinePrecision] + N[(5.0 * y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[(2.0 * y + t), $MachinePrecision] * x + N[(5.0 * y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if t < -7e14

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[x \cdot \left(\left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) + t\right) + y \cdot 5 \]
   2. Add Preprocessing
   3. Step-by-step derivation

      1. lift-+.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(\left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) + t\right) + y \cdot 5} \]

      2. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot 5 + x \cdot \left(\left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) + t\right)} \]

      3. lift-*.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot 5} + x \cdot \left(\left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) + t\right) \]

      4. lower-fma.f64 100.0

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, 5, x \cdot \left(\left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) + t\right)\right)} \]

      5. lift-*.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, 5, \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(\left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) + t\right)}\right) \]

      6. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, 5, \color{blue}{\left(\left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) + t\right) \cdot x}\right) \]

      7. lower-*.f64 100.0

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, 5, \color{blue}{\left(\left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) + t\right) \cdot x}\right) \]

      8. lift-+.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, 5, \color{blue}{\left(\left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) + t\right)} \cdot x\right) \]

      9. lift-+.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, 5, \left(\color{blue}{\left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right)} + t\right) \cdot x\right) \]

      10. lift-+.f64 N/A

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, 5, \left(\left(\color{blue}{\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right)} + y\right) + t\right) \cdot x\right) \]

      11. associate-+l+ N/A

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, 5, \left(\color{blue}{\left(\left(y + z\right) + \left(z + y\right)\right)} + t\right) \cdot x\right) \]

      12. +-commutative N/A

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, 5, \left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + \color{blue}{\left(y + z\right)}\right) + t\right) \cdot x\right) \]

      13. lift-+.f64 N/A

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, 5, \left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + \color{blue}{\left(y + z\right)}\right) + t\right) \cdot x\right) \]

      14. count-2 N/A

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, 5, \left(\color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(y + z\right)} + t\right) \cdot x\right) \]

      15. lower-fma.f64 100.0

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, 5, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(2, y + z, t\right)} \cdot x\right) \]

      16. lift-+.f64 N/A

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, 5, \mathsf{fma}\left(2, \color{blue}{y + z}, t\right) \cdot x\right) \]

      17. +-commutative N/A

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, 5, \mathsf{fma}\left(2, \color{blue}{z + y}, t\right) \cdot x\right) \]

      18. lower-+.f64 100.0

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, 5, \mathsf{fma}\left(2, \color{blue}{z + y}, t\right) \cdot x\right) \]

   4. Applied rewrites 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, 5, \mathsf{fma}\left(2, z + y, t\right) \cdot x\right)} \]

   5. Taylor expanded in y around 0

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, 5, \color{blue}{\left(t + 2 \cdot z\right)} \cdot x\right) \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, 5, \color{blue}{\left(2 \cdot z + t\right)} \cdot x\right) \]

      2. lower-fma.f64 98.8

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, 5, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(2, z, t\right)} \cdot x\right) \]

   7. Applied rewrites 98.8%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, 5, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(2, z, t\right)} \cdot x\right) \]

   if -7e14 < t < 5.79999999999999974e97

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[x \cdot \left(\left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) + t\right) + y \cdot 5 \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in t around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{5 \cdot y + x \cdot \left(2 \cdot y + 2 \cdot z\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(2 \cdot y + 2 \cdot z\right) + 5 \cdot y} \]

      2. distribute-lft-out N/A

         \[\leadsto x \cdot \color{blue}{\left(2 \cdot \left(y + z\right)\right)} + 5 \cdot y \]

      3. associate-*r* N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot 2\right) \cdot \left(y + z\right)} + 5 \cdot y \]

      4. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(2 \cdot x\right)} \cdot \left(y + z\right) + 5 \cdot y \]

      5. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(2 \cdot x, y + z, 5 \cdot y\right)} \]

      6. lower-*.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{2 \cdot x}, y + z, 5 \cdot y\right) \]

      7. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(2 \cdot x, \color{blue}{z + y}, 5 \cdot y\right) \]

      8. lower-+.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(2 \cdot x, \color{blue}{z + y}, 5 \cdot y\right) \]

      9. lower-*.f64 96.4

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(2 \cdot x, z + y, \color{blue}{5 \cdot y}\right) \]

   5. Applied rewrites 96.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(2 \cdot x, z + y, 5 \cdot y\right)} \]

   if 5.79999999999999974e97 < t

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[x \cdot \left(\left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) + t\right) + y \cdot 5 \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in z around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{5 \cdot y + x \cdot \left(t + 2 \cdot y\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(t + 2 \cdot y\right) + 5 \cdot y} \]

      2. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(t + 2 \cdot y\right) \cdot x} + 5 \cdot y \]

      3. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(t + 2 \cdot y, x, 5 \cdot y\right)} \]

      4. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{2 \cdot y + t}, x, 5 \cdot y\right) \]

      5. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(2, y, t\right)}, x, 5 \cdot y\right) \]

      6. lower-*.f64 99.8

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(2, y, t\right), x, \color{blue}{5 \cdot y}\right) \]

   5. Applied rewrites 99.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(2, y, t\right), x, 5 \cdot y\right)} \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.
4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 5: 93.1% accurate, 0.9× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -9 \cdot 10^{-6} \lor \neg \left(z \leq 5.2 \cdot 10^{-44}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(y, 5, \mathsf{fma}\left(2, z, t\right) \cdot x\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(2, y, t\right), x, 5 \cdot y\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= z -9e-6) (not (<= z 5.2e-44)))
   (fma y 5.0 (* (fma 2.0 z t) x))
   (fma (fma 2.0 y t) x (* 5.0 y))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z <= -9e-6) || !(z <= 5.2e-44)) {
		tmp = fma(y, 5.0, (fma(2.0, z, t) * x));
	} else {
		tmp = fma(fma(2.0, y, t), x, (5.0 * y));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((z <= -9e-6) || !(z <= 5.2e-44))
		tmp = fma(y, 5.0, Float64(fma(2.0, z, t) * x));
	else
		tmp = fma(fma(2.0, y, t), x, Float64(5.0 * y));
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := If[Or[LessEqual[z, -9e-6], N[Not[LessEqual[z, 5.2e-44]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(y * 5.0 + N[(N[(2.0 * z + t), $MachinePrecision] * x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[(2.0 * y + t), $MachinePrecision] * x + N[(5.0 * y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if z < -9.00000000000000023e-6 or 5.1999999999999996e-44 < z

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[x \cdot \left(\left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) + t\right) + y \cdot 5 \]
   2. Add Preprocessing
   3. Step-by-step derivation

      1. lift-+.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(\left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) + t\right) + y \cdot 5} \]

      2. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot 5 + x \cdot \left(\left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) + t\right)} \]

      3. lift-*.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot 5} + x \cdot \left(\left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) + t\right) \]

      4. lower-fma.f64 100.0

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, 5, x \cdot \left(\left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) + t\right)\right)} \]

      5. lift-*.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, 5, \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(\left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) + t\right)}\right) \]

      6. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, 5, \color{blue}{\left(\left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) + t\right) \cdot x}\right) \]

      7. lower-*.f64 100.0

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, 5, \color{blue}{\left(\left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) + t\right) \cdot x}\right) \]

      8. lift-+.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, 5, \color{blue}{\left(\left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) + t\right)} \cdot x\right) \]

      9. lift-+.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, 5, \left(\color{blue}{\left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right)} + t\right) \cdot x\right) \]

      10. lift-+.f64 N/A

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, 5, \left(\left(\color{blue}{\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right)} + y\right) + t\right) \cdot x\right) \]

      11. associate-+l+ N/A

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, 5, \left(\color{blue}{\left(\left(y + z\right) + \left(z + y\right)\right)} + t\right) \cdot x\right) \]

      12. +-commutative N/A

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, 5, \left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + \color{blue}{\left(y + z\right)}\right) + t\right) \cdot x\right) \]

      13. lift-+.f64 N/A

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, 5, \left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + \color{blue}{\left(y + z\right)}\right) + t\right) \cdot x\right) \]

      14. count-2 N/A

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, 5, \left(\color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(y + z\right)} + t\right) \cdot x\right) \]

      15. lower-fma.f64 100.0

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, 5, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(2, y + z, t\right)} \cdot x\right) \]

      16. lift-+.f64 N/A

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, 5, \mathsf{fma}\left(2, \color{blue}{y + z}, t\right) \cdot x\right) \]

      17. +-commutative N/A

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, 5, \mathsf{fma}\left(2, \color{blue}{z + y}, t\right) \cdot x\right) \]

      18. lower-+.f64 100.0

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, 5, \mathsf{fma}\left(2, \color{blue}{z + y}, t\right) \cdot x\right) \]

   4. Applied rewrites 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, 5, \mathsf{fma}\left(2, z + y, t\right) \cdot x\right)} \]

   5. Taylor expanded in y around 0

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, 5, \color{blue}{\left(t + 2 \cdot z\right)} \cdot x\right) \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, 5, \color{blue}{\left(2 \cdot z + t\right)} \cdot x\right) \]

      2. lower-fma.f64 95.1

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, 5, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(2, z, t\right)} \cdot x\right) \]

   7. Applied rewrites 95.1%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, 5, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(2, z, t\right)} \cdot x\right) \]

   if -9.00000000000000023e-6 < z < 5.1999999999999996e-44

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[x \cdot \left(\left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) + t\right) + y \cdot 5 \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in z around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{5 \cdot y + x \cdot \left(t + 2 \cdot y\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(t + 2 \cdot y\right) + 5 \cdot y} \]

      2. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(t + 2 \cdot y\right) \cdot x} + 5 \cdot y \]

      3. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(t + 2 \cdot y, x, 5 \cdot y\right)} \]

      4. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{2 \cdot y + t}, x, 5 \cdot y\right) \]

      5. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(2, y, t\right)}, x, 5 \cdot y\right) \]

      6. lower-*.f64 98.8

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(2, y, t\right), x, \color{blue}{5 \cdot y}\right) \]

   5. Applied rewrites 98.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(2, y, t\right), x, 5 \cdot y\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 96.6%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -9 \cdot 10^{-6} \lor \neg \left(z \leq 5.2 \cdot 10^{-44}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(y, 5, \mathsf{fma}\left(2, z, t\right) \cdot x\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(2, y, t\right), x, 5 \cdot y\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 6: 82.4% accurate, 0.9× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -1.45 \cdot 10^{-128} \lor \neg \left(y \leq 5.2 \cdot 10^{+44}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(2, y, t\right), x, 5 \cdot y\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(2, z, t\right) \cdot x\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= y -1.45e-128) (not (<= y 5.2e+44)))
   (fma (fma 2.0 y t) x (* 5.0 y))
   (* (fma 2.0 z t) x)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if ((y <= -1.45e-128) || !(y <= 5.2e+44)) {
		tmp = fma(fma(2.0, y, t), x, (5.0 * y));
	} else {
		tmp = fma(2.0, z, t) * x;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((y <= -1.45e-128) || !(y <= 5.2e+44))
		tmp = fma(fma(2.0, y, t), x, Float64(5.0 * y));
	else
		tmp = Float64(fma(2.0, z, t) * x);
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := If[Or[LessEqual[y, -1.45e-128], N[Not[LessEqual[y, 5.2e+44]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(N[(2.0 * y + t), $MachinePrecision] * x + N[(5.0 * y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[(2.0 * z + t), $MachinePrecision] * x), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if y < -1.45e-128 or 5.1999999999999998e44 < y

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[x \cdot \left(\left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) + t\right) + y \cdot 5 \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in z around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{5 \cdot y + x \cdot \left(t + 2 \cdot y\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(t + 2 \cdot y\right) + 5 \cdot y} \]

      2. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(t + 2 \cdot y\right) \cdot x} + 5 \cdot y \]

      3. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(t + 2 \cdot y, x, 5 \cdot y\right)} \]

      4. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{2 \cdot y + t}, x, 5 \cdot y\right) \]

      5. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(2, y, t\right)}, x, 5 \cdot y\right) \]

      6. lower-*.f64 88.4

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(2, y, t\right), x, \color{blue}{5 \cdot y}\right) \]

   5. Applied rewrites 88.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(2, y, t\right), x, 5 \cdot y\right)} \]

   if -1.45e-128 < y < 5.1999999999999998e44

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[x \cdot \left(\left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) + t\right) + y \cdot 5 \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in y around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(t + 2 \cdot z\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(t + 2 \cdot z\right) \cdot x} \]

      2. lower-*.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(t + 2 \cdot z\right) \cdot x} \]

      3. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(2 \cdot z + t\right)} \cdot x \]

      4. lower-fma.f64 88.8

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(2, z, t\right)} \cdot x \]

   5. Applied rewrites 88.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(2, z, t\right) \cdot x} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 88.6%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -1.45 \cdot 10^{-128} \lor \neg \left(y \leq 5.2 \cdot 10^{+44}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(2, y, t\right), x, 5 \cdot y\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(2, z, t\right) \cdot x\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 7: 45.2% accurate, 0.9× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;t \leq -8.5 \cdot 10^{+139}:\\ \;\;\;\;t \cdot x\\ \mathbf{elif}\;t \leq -4.2 \cdot 10^{+33}:\\ \;\;\;\;5 \cdot y\\ \mathbf{elif}\;t \leq 4.9 \cdot 10^{+107}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(z \cdot x\right) \cdot 2\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;t \cdot x\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= t -8.5e+139)
   (* t x)
   (if (<= t -4.2e+33)
     (* 5.0 y)
     (if (<= t 4.9e+107) (* (* z x) 2.0) (* t x)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (t <= -8.5e+139) {
		tmp = t * x;
	} else if (t <= -4.2e+33) {
		tmp = 5.0 * y;
	} else if (t <= 4.9e+107) {
		tmp = (z * x) * 2.0;
	} else {
		tmp = t * x;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (t <= (-8.5d+139)) then
        tmp = t * x
    else if (t <= (-4.2d+33)) then
        tmp = 5.0d0 * y
    else if (t <= 4.9d+107) then
        tmp = (z * x) * 2.0d0
    else
        tmp = t * x
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (t <= -8.5e+139) {
		tmp = t * x;
	} else if (t <= -4.2e+33) {
		tmp = 5.0 * y;
	} else if (t <= 4.9e+107) {
		tmp = (z * x) * 2.0;
	} else {
		tmp = t * x;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	tmp = 0
	if t <= -8.5e+139:
		tmp = t * x
	elif t <= -4.2e+33:
		tmp = 5.0 * y
	elif t <= 4.9e+107:
		tmp = (z * x) * 2.0
	else:
		tmp = t * x
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (t <= -8.5e+139)
		tmp = Float64(t * x);
	elseif (t <= -4.2e+33)
		tmp = Float64(5.0 * y);
	elseif (t <= 4.9e+107)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(z * x) * 2.0);
	else
		tmp = Float64(t * x);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (t <= -8.5e+139)
		tmp = t * x;
	elseif (t <= -4.2e+33)
		tmp = 5.0 * y;
	elseif (t <= 4.9e+107)
		tmp = (z * x) * 2.0;
	else
		tmp = t * x;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := If[LessEqual[t, -8.5e+139], N[(t * x), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[t, -4.2e+33], N[(5.0 * y), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[t, 4.9e+107], N[(N[(z * x), $MachinePrecision] * 2.0), $MachinePrecision], N[(t * x), $MachinePrecision]]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if t < -8.5e139 or 4.9000000000000001e107 < t

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[x \cdot \left(\left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) + t\right) + y \cdot 5 \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in t around inf

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{t \cdot x} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. lower-*.f64 78.1

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{t \cdot x} \]

   5. Applied rewrites 78.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{t \cdot x} \]

   if -8.5e139 < t < -4.2000000000000001e33

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[x \cdot \left(\left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) + t\right) + y \cdot 5 \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{5 \cdot y} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. lower-*.f64 53.8

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{5 \cdot y} \]

   5. Applied rewrites 53.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{5 \cdot y} \]

   if -4.2000000000000001e33 < t < 4.9000000000000001e107

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[x \cdot \left(\left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) + t\right) + y \cdot 5 \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in z around inf

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(x \cdot z\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot z\right) \cdot 2} \]

      2. lower-*.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot z\right) \cdot 2} \]

      3. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(z \cdot x\right)} \cdot 2 \]

      4. lower-*.f64 47.7

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(z \cdot x\right)} \cdot 2 \]

   5. Applied rewrites 47.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(z \cdot x\right) \cdot 2} \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.
4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 8: 76.6% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -2.05 \cdot 10^{-66} \lor \neg \left(y \leq 3.5 \cdot 10^{+58}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(y, 5, \left(y + y\right) \cdot x\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(2, z, t\right) \cdot x\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= y -2.05e-66) (not (<= y 3.5e+58)))
   (fma y 5.0 (* (+ y y) x))
   (* (fma 2.0 z t) x)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if ((y <= -2.05e-66) || !(y <= 3.5e+58)) {
		tmp = fma(y, 5.0, ((y + y) * x));
	} else {
		tmp = fma(2.0, z, t) * x;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((y <= -2.05e-66) || !(y <= 3.5e+58))
		tmp = fma(y, 5.0, Float64(Float64(y + y) * x));
	else
		tmp = Float64(fma(2.0, z, t) * x);
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := If[Or[LessEqual[y, -2.05e-66], N[Not[LessEqual[y, 3.5e+58]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(y * 5.0 + N[(N[(y + y), $MachinePrecision] * x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[(2.0 * z + t), $MachinePrecision] * x), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if y < -2.04999999999999999e-66 or 3.4999999999999997e58 < y

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[x \cdot \left(\left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) + t\right) + y \cdot 5 \]
   2. Add Preprocessing
   3. Step-by-step derivation

      1. lift-+.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(\left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) + t\right) + y \cdot 5} \]

      2. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot 5 + x \cdot \left(\left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) + t\right)} \]

      3. lift-*.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot 5} + x \cdot \left(\left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) + t\right) \]

      4. lower-fma.f64 100.0

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, 5, x \cdot \left(\left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) + t\right)\right)} \]

      5. lift-*.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, 5, \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(\left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) + t\right)}\right) \]

      6. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, 5, \color{blue}{\left(\left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) + t\right) \cdot x}\right) \]

      7. lower-*.f64 100.0

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, 5, \color{blue}{\left(\left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) + t\right) \cdot x}\right) \]

      8. lift-+.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, 5, \color{blue}{\left(\left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) + t\right)} \cdot x\right) \]

      9. lift-+.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, 5, \left(\color{blue}{\left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right)} + t\right) \cdot x\right) \]

      10. lift-+.f64 N/A

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, 5, \left(\left(\color{blue}{\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right)} + y\right) + t\right) \cdot x\right) \]

      11. associate-+l+ N/A

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, 5, \left(\color{blue}{\left(\left(y + z\right) + \left(z + y\right)\right)} + t\right) \cdot x\right) \]

      12. +-commutative N/A

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, 5, \left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + \color{blue}{\left(y + z\right)}\right) + t\right) \cdot x\right) \]

      13. lift-+.f64 N/A

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, 5, \left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + \color{blue}{\left(y + z\right)}\right) + t\right) \cdot x\right) \]

      14. count-2 N/A

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, 5, \left(\color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(y + z\right)} + t\right) \cdot x\right) \]

      15. lower-fma.f64 100.0

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, 5, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(2, y + z, t\right)} \cdot x\right) \]

      16. lift-+.f64 N/A

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, 5, \mathsf{fma}\left(2, \color{blue}{y + z}, t\right) \cdot x\right) \]

      17. +-commutative N/A

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, 5, \mathsf{fma}\left(2, \color{blue}{z + y}, t\right) \cdot x\right) \]

      18. lower-+.f64 100.0

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, 5, \mathsf{fma}\left(2, \color{blue}{z + y}, t\right) \cdot x\right) \]

   4. Applied rewrites 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, 5, \mathsf{fma}\left(2, z + y, t\right) \cdot x\right)} \]

   5. Taylor expanded in y around inf

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, 5, \color{blue}{\left(2 \cdot y\right)} \cdot x\right) \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. lower-*.f64 72.5

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, 5, \color{blue}{\left(2 \cdot y\right)} \cdot x\right) \]

   7. Applied rewrites 72.5%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, 5, \color{blue}{\left(2 \cdot y\right)} \cdot x\right) \]
   8. Step-by-step derivation

   9. Applied rewrites 72.5%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, 5, \left(y + \color{blue}{y}\right) \cdot x\right) \]

   if -2.04999999999999999e-66 < y < 3.4999999999999997e58

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[x \cdot \left(\left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) + t\right) + y \cdot 5 \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in y around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(t + 2 \cdot z\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(t + 2 \cdot z\right) \cdot x} \]

      2. lower-*.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(t + 2 \cdot z\right) \cdot x} \]

      3. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(2 \cdot z + t\right)} \cdot x \]

      4. lower-fma.f64 87.1

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(2, z, t\right)} \cdot x \]

   5. Applied rewrites 87.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(2, z, t\right) \cdot x} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 79.5%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -2.05 \cdot 10^{-66} \lor \neg \left(y \leq 3.5 \cdot 10^{+58}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(y, 5, \left(y + y\right) \cdot x\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(2, z, t\right) \cdot x\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 9: 76.6% accurate, 1.1× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -2.05 \cdot 10^{-66} \lor \neg \left(y \leq 3.5 \cdot 10^{+58}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(2, x, 5\right) \cdot y\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(2, z, t\right) \cdot x\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= y -2.05e-66) (not (<= y 3.5e+58)))
   (* (fma 2.0 x 5.0) y)
   (* (fma 2.0 z t) x)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if ((y <= -2.05e-66) || !(y <= 3.5e+58)) {
		tmp = fma(2.0, x, 5.0) * y;
	} else {
		tmp = fma(2.0, z, t) * x;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((y <= -2.05e-66) || !(y <= 3.5e+58))
		tmp = Float64(fma(2.0, x, 5.0) * y);
	else
		tmp = Float64(fma(2.0, z, t) * x);
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := If[Or[LessEqual[y, -2.05e-66], N[Not[LessEqual[y, 3.5e+58]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(N[(2.0 * x + 5.0), $MachinePrecision] * y), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[(2.0 * z + t), $MachinePrecision] * x), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if y < -2.04999999999999999e-66 or 3.4999999999999997e58 < y

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[x \cdot \left(\left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) + t\right) + y \cdot 5 \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in y around inf

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(5 + 2 \cdot x\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(5 + 2 \cdot x\right) \cdot y} \]

      2. lower-*.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(5 + 2 \cdot x\right) \cdot y} \]

      3. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(2 \cdot x + 5\right)} \cdot y \]

      4. lower-fma.f64 72.5

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(2, x, 5\right)} \cdot y \]

   5. Applied rewrites 72.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(2, x, 5\right) \cdot y} \]

   if -2.04999999999999999e-66 < y < 3.4999999999999997e58

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[x \cdot \left(\left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) + t\right) + y \cdot 5 \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in y around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(t + 2 \cdot z\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(t + 2 \cdot z\right) \cdot x} \]

      2. lower-*.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(t + 2 \cdot z\right) \cdot x} \]

      3. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(2 \cdot z + t\right)} \cdot x \]

      4. lower-fma.f64 87.1

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(2, z, t\right)} \cdot x \]

   5. Applied rewrites 87.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(2, z, t\right) \cdot x} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 79.5%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -2.05 \cdot 10^{-66} \lor \neg \left(y \leq 3.5 \cdot 10^{+58}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(2, x, 5\right) \cdot y\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(2, z, t\right) \cdot x\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 10: 46.6% accurate, 1.4× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -3.4 \cdot 10^{-83} \lor \neg \left(x \leq 7.6 \cdot 10^{-44}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;t \cdot x\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;5 \cdot y\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= x -3.4e-83) (not (<= x 7.6e-44))) (* t x) (* 5.0 y)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x <= -3.4e-83) || !(x <= 7.6e-44)) {
		tmp = t * x;
	} else {
		tmp = 5.0 * y;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((x <= (-3.4d-83)) .or. (.not. (x <= 7.6d-44))) then
        tmp = t * x
    else
        tmp = 5.0d0 * y
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x <= -3.4e-83) || !(x <= 7.6e-44)) {
		tmp = t * x;
	} else {
		tmp = 5.0 * y;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	tmp = 0
	if (x <= -3.4e-83) or not (x <= 7.6e-44):
		tmp = t * x
	else:
		tmp = 5.0 * y
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((x <= -3.4e-83) || !(x <= 7.6e-44))
		tmp = Float64(t * x);
	else
		tmp = Float64(5.0 * y);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((x <= -3.4e-83) || ~((x <= 7.6e-44)))
		tmp = t * x;
	else
		tmp = 5.0 * y;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := If[Or[LessEqual[x, -3.4e-83], N[Not[LessEqual[x, 7.6e-44]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(t * x), $MachinePrecision], N[(5.0 * y), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if x < -3.3999999999999998e-83 or 7.6000000000000002e-44 < x

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[x \cdot \left(\left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) + t\right) + y \cdot 5 \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in t around inf

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{t \cdot x} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. lower-*.f64 45.1

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{t \cdot x} \]

   5. Applied rewrites 45.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{t \cdot x} \]

   if -3.3999999999999998e-83 < x < 7.6000000000000002e-44

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[x \cdot \left(\left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) + t\right) + y \cdot 5 \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{5 \cdot y} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. lower-*.f64 64.6

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{5 \cdot y} \]

   5. Applied rewrites 64.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{5 \cdot y} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 52.6%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -3.4 \cdot 10^{-83} \lor \neg \left(x \leq 7.6 \cdot 10^{-44}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;t \cdot x\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;5 \cdot y\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 11: 30.2% accurate, 4.3× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ 5 \cdot y \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t) :precision binary64 (* 5.0 y))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return 5.0 * y;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = 5.0d0 * y
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return 5.0 * y;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return 5.0 * y

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(5.0 * y)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 5.0 * y;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(5.0 * y), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 100.0%

   \[x \cdot \left(\left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) + t\right) + y \cdot 5 \]
2. Add Preprocessing

3. Taylor expanded in x around 0

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{5 \cdot y} \]
4. Step-by-step derivation

   1. lower-*.f64 27.4

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{5 \cdot y} \]

5. Applied rewrites 27.4%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{5 \cdot y} \]
6. Add Preprocessing

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2024329 
(FPCore (x y z t)
  :name "Graphics.Rendering.Plot.Render.Plot.Legend:renderLegendOutside from plot-0.2.3.4, B"
  :precision binary64
  (+ (* x (+ (+ (+ (+ y z) z) y) t)) (* y 5.0)))