Linear.V4:$cdot from linear-1.19.1.3, C

Percentage Accurate: 96.2% → 98.0%

Time: 6.9s

Alternatives: 10

Speedup: 0.5×

• 41.8% of points produce a very large (infinite) output. You may want to add a precondition.

Specification

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
 :precision binary64
 (+ (+ (+ (* x y) (* z t)) (* a b)) (* c i)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	return (((x * y) + (z * t)) + (a * b)) + (c * i);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: c
    real(8), intent (in) :: i
    code = (((x * y) + (z * t)) + (a * b)) + (c * i)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	return (((x * y) + (z * t)) + (a * b)) + (c * i);
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i):
	return (((x * y) + (z * t)) + (a * b)) + (c * i)

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(x * y) + Float64(z * t)) + Float64(a * b)) + Float64(c * i))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = (((x * y) + (z * t)) + (a * b)) + (c * i);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := N[(N[(N[(N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(c * i), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Initial Program: 96.2% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
 :precision binary64
 (+ (+ (+ (* x y) (* z t)) (* a b)) (* c i)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	return (((x * y) + (z * t)) + (a * b)) + (c * i);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: c
    real(8), intent (in) :: i
    code = (((x * y) + (z * t)) + (a * b)) + (c * i)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	return (((x * y) + (z * t)) + (a * b)) + (c * i);
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i):
	return (((x * y) + (z * t)) + (a * b)) + (c * i)

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(x * y) + Float64(z * t)) + Float64(a * b)) + Float64(c * i))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = (((x * y) + (z * t)) + (a * b)) + (c * i);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := N[(N[(N[(N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(c * i), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Alternative 1: 98.0% accurate, 0.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;i \cdot c + \left(b \cdot a + \left(t \cdot z + y \cdot x\right)\right) \leq \infty:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(z, t, \mathsf{fma}\left(y, x, \mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, b \cdot a\right)\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, t \cdot z\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= (+ (* i c) (+ (* b a) (+ (* t z) (* y x)))) INFINITY)
   (fma z t (fma y x (fma i c (* b a))))
   (fma i c (* t z))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double tmp;
	if (((i * c) + ((b * a) + ((t * z) + (y * x)))) <= ((double) INFINITY)) {
		tmp = fma(z, t, fma(y, x, fma(i, c, (b * a))));
	} else {
		tmp = fma(i, c, (t * z));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (Float64(Float64(i * c) + Float64(Float64(b * a) + Float64(Float64(t * z) + Float64(y * x)))) <= Inf)
		tmp = fma(z, t, fma(y, x, fma(i, c, Float64(b * a))));
	else
		tmp = fma(i, c, Float64(t * z));
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := If[LessEqual[N[(N[(i * c), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(b * a), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(t * z), $MachinePrecision] + N[(y * x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], Infinity], N[(z * t + N[(y * x + N[(i * c + N[(b * a), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(i * c + N[(t * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (+.f64 (+.f64 (+.f64 (*.f64 x y) (*.f64 z t)) (*.f64 a b)) (*.f64 c i)) < +inf.0

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Add Preprocessing
   3. Step-by-step derivation

      1. lift-+.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i} \]

      2. lift-+.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} + c \cdot i \]

      3. associate-+l+ N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + \left(a \cdot b + c \cdot i\right)} \]

      4. lift-+.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)} + \left(a \cdot b + c \cdot i\right) \]

      5. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(z \cdot t + x \cdot y\right)} + \left(a \cdot b + c \cdot i\right) \]

      6. associate-+l+ N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot t + \left(x \cdot y + \left(a \cdot b + c \cdot i\right)\right)} \]

      7. lift-*.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot t} + \left(x \cdot y + \left(a \cdot b + c \cdot i\right)\right) \]

      8. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, t, x \cdot y + \left(a \cdot b + c \cdot i\right)\right)} \]

      9. lift-*.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z, t, \color{blue}{x \cdot y} + \left(a \cdot b + c \cdot i\right)\right) \]

      10. *-commutative N/A

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z, t, \color{blue}{y \cdot x} + \left(a \cdot b + c \cdot i\right)\right) \]

      11. lower-fma.f64 N/A

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z, t, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, x, a \cdot b + c \cdot i\right)}\right) \]

      12. +-commutative N/A

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z, t, \mathsf{fma}\left(y, x, \color{blue}{c \cdot i + a \cdot b}\right)\right) \]

      13. lift-*.f64 N/A

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z, t, \mathsf{fma}\left(y, x, \color{blue}{c \cdot i} + a \cdot b\right)\right) \]

      14. *-commutative N/A

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z, t, \mathsf{fma}\left(y, x, \color{blue}{i \cdot c} + a \cdot b\right)\right) \]

      15. lower-fma.f64 100.0

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z, t, \mathsf{fma}\left(y, x, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, a \cdot b\right)}\right)\right) \]

      16. lift-*.f64 N/A

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z, t, \mathsf{fma}\left(y, x, \mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, \color{blue}{a \cdot b}\right)\right)\right) \]

      17. *-commutative N/A

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z, t, \mathsf{fma}\left(y, x, \mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, \color{blue}{b \cdot a}\right)\right)\right) \]

      18. lower-*.f64 100.0

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z, t, \mathsf{fma}\left(y, x, \mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, \color{blue}{b \cdot a}\right)\right)\right) \]

   4. Applied rewrites 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, t, \mathsf{fma}\left(y, x, \mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, b \cdot a\right)\right)\right)} \]

   if +inf.0 < (+.f64 (+.f64 (+.f64 (*.f64 x y) (*.f64 z t)) (*.f64 a b)) (*.f64 c i))

   1. Initial program 0.0%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in a around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c \cdot i + \left(t \cdot z + x \cdot y\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{i \cdot c} + \left(t \cdot z + x \cdot y\right) \]

      2. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, t \cdot z + x \cdot y\right)} \]

      3. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(t, z, x \cdot y\right)}\right) \]

      4. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, \mathsf{fma}\left(t, z, \color{blue}{y \cdot x}\right)\right) \]

      5. lower-*.f64 57.1

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, \mathsf{fma}\left(t, z, \color{blue}{y \cdot x}\right)\right) \]

   5. Applied rewrites 57.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, \mathsf{fma}\left(t, z, y \cdot x\right)\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in x around 0

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, t \cdot z\right) \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

   8. Applied rewrites 85.7%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, t \cdot z\right) \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 99.6%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;i \cdot c + \left(b \cdot a + \left(t \cdot z + y \cdot x\right)\right) \leq \infty:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(z, t, \mathsf{fma}\left(y, x, \mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, b \cdot a\right)\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, t \cdot z\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 2: 74.6% accurate, 0.6× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_1 := \mathsf{fma}\left(t, z, y \cdot x\right)\\ t_2 := t \cdot z + y \cdot x\\ \mathbf{if}\;t\_2 \leq -2 \cdot 10^{+33}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_1\\ \mathbf{elif}\;t\_2 \leq 10^{+209}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, i \cdot c\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_1\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_1 (fma t z (* y x))) (t_2 (+ (* t z) (* y x))))
   (if (<= t_2 -2e+33) t_1 (if (<= t_2 1e+209) (fma b a (* i c)) t_1))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double t_1 = fma(t, z, (y * x));
	double t_2 = (t * z) + (y * x);
	double tmp;
	if (t_2 <= -2e+33) {
		tmp = t_1;
	} else if (t_2 <= 1e+209) {
		tmp = fma(b, a, (i * c));
	} else {
		tmp = t_1;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	t_1 = fma(t, z, Float64(y * x))
	t_2 = Float64(Float64(t * z) + Float64(y * x))
	tmp = 0.0
	if (t_2 <= -2e+33)
		tmp = t_1;
	elseif (t_2 <= 1e+209)
		tmp = fma(b, a, Float64(i * c));
	else
		tmp = t_1;
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := Block[{t$95$1 = N[(t * z + N[(y * x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, Block[{t$95$2 = N[(N[(t * z), $MachinePrecision] + N[(y * x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[t$95$2, -2e+33], t$95$1, If[LessEqual[t$95$2, 1e+209], N[(b * a + N[(i * c), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], t$95$1]]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (+.f64 (*.f64 x y) (*.f64 z t)) < -1.9999999999999999e33 or 1.0000000000000001e209 < (+.f64 (*.f64 x y) (*.f64 z t))

   1. Initial program 95.3%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in a around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c \cdot i + \left(t \cdot z + x \cdot y\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{i \cdot c} + \left(t \cdot z + x \cdot y\right) \]

      2. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, t \cdot z + x \cdot y\right)} \]

      3. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(t, z, x \cdot y\right)}\right) \]

      4. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, \mathsf{fma}\left(t, z, \color{blue}{y \cdot x}\right)\right) \]

      5. lower-*.f64 85.6

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, \mathsf{fma}\left(t, z, \color{blue}{y \cdot x}\right)\right) \]

   5. Applied rewrites 85.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, \mathsf{fma}\left(t, z, y \cdot x\right)\right)} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

   7. Applied rewrites 84.3%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z, \color{blue}{t}, \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, x \cdot y\right)\right) \]

   8. Taylor expanded in c around 0

      \[\leadsto t \cdot z + \color{blue}{x \cdot y} \]
   9. Step-by-step derivation

   10. Applied rewrites 76.5%

       \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(t, \color{blue}{z}, y \cdot x\right) \]

   if -1.9999999999999999e33 < (+.f64 (*.f64 x y) (*.f64 z t)) < 1.0000000000000001e209

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in z around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(c \cdot i + x \cdot y\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{b \cdot a} + \left(c \cdot i + x \cdot y\right) \]

      2. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, c \cdot i + x \cdot y\right)} \]

      3. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \color{blue}{i \cdot c} + x \cdot y\right) \]

      4. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, x \cdot y\right)}\right) \]

      5. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, \color{blue}{y \cdot x}\right)\right) \]

      6. lower-*.f64 89.8

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, \color{blue}{y \cdot x}\right)\right) \]

   5. Applied rewrites 89.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, y \cdot x\right)\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in x around 0

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, c \cdot i\right) \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

   8. Applied rewrites 81.2%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, c \cdot i\right) \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 78.4%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;t \cdot z + y \cdot x \leq -2 \cdot 10^{+33}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(t, z, y \cdot x\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;t \cdot z + y \cdot x \leq 10^{+209}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, i \cdot c\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(t, z, y \cdot x\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 3: 61.7% accurate, 0.7× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;i \cdot c \leq -5 \cdot 10^{+282}:\\ \;\;\;\;i \cdot c\\ \mathbf{elif}\;i \cdot c \leq -4 \cdot 10^{-62}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, t \cdot z\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;i \cdot c \leq 4 \cdot 10^{+237}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(t, z, y \cdot x\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;i \cdot c\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= (* i c) -5e+282)
   (* i c)
   (if (<= (* i c) -4e-62)
     (fma a b (* t z))
     (if (<= (* i c) 4e+237) (fma t z (* y x)) (* i c)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double tmp;
	if ((i * c) <= -5e+282) {
		tmp = i * c;
	} else if ((i * c) <= -4e-62) {
		tmp = fma(a, b, (t * z));
	} else if ((i * c) <= 4e+237) {
		tmp = fma(t, z, (y * x));
	} else {
		tmp = i * c;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (Float64(i * c) <= -5e+282)
		tmp = Float64(i * c);
	elseif (Float64(i * c) <= -4e-62)
		tmp = fma(a, b, Float64(t * z));
	elseif (Float64(i * c) <= 4e+237)
		tmp = fma(t, z, Float64(y * x));
	else
		tmp = Float64(i * c);
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := If[LessEqual[N[(i * c), $MachinePrecision], -5e+282], N[(i * c), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[N[(i * c), $MachinePrecision], -4e-62], N[(a * b + N[(t * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[N[(i * c), $MachinePrecision], 4e+237], N[(t * z + N[(y * x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(i * c), $MachinePrecision]]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if (*.f64 c i) < -4.99999999999999978e282 or 3.99999999999999976e237 < (*.f64 c i)

   1. Initial program 91.1%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in c around inf

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c \cdot i} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{i \cdot c} \]

      2. lower-*.f64 88.3

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{i \cdot c} \]

   5. Applied rewrites 88.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{i \cdot c} \]

   if -4.99999999999999978e282 < (*.f64 c i) < -4.0000000000000002e-62

   1. Initial program 98.2%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(c \cdot i + t \cdot z\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{b \cdot a} + \left(c \cdot i + t \cdot z\right) \]

      2. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, c \cdot i + t \cdot z\right)} \]

      3. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \color{blue}{i \cdot c} + t \cdot z\right) \]

      4. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, t \cdot z\right)}\right) \]

      5. lower-*.f64 94.7

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, \color{blue}{t \cdot z}\right)\right) \]

   5. Applied rewrites 94.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, t \cdot z\right)\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in c around 0

      \[\leadsto a \cdot b + \color{blue}{t \cdot z} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

   8. Applied rewrites 77.6%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(a, \color{blue}{b}, t \cdot z\right) \]

   if -4.0000000000000002e-62 < (*.f64 c i) < 3.99999999999999976e237

   1. Initial program 98.7%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in a around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c \cdot i + \left(t \cdot z + x \cdot y\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{i \cdot c} + \left(t \cdot z + x \cdot y\right) \]

      2. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, t \cdot z + x \cdot y\right)} \]

      3. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(t, z, x \cdot y\right)}\right) \]

      4. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, \mathsf{fma}\left(t, z, \color{blue}{y \cdot x}\right)\right) \]

      5. lower-*.f64 75.9

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, \mathsf{fma}\left(t, z, \color{blue}{y \cdot x}\right)\right) \]

   5. Applied rewrites 75.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, \mathsf{fma}\left(t, z, y \cdot x\right)\right)} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

   7. Applied rewrites 75.9%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z, \color{blue}{t}, \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, x \cdot y\right)\right) \]

   8. Taylor expanded in c around 0

      \[\leadsto t \cdot z + \color{blue}{x \cdot y} \]
   9. Step-by-step derivation

   10. Applied rewrites 68.1%

       \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(t, \color{blue}{z}, y \cdot x\right) \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 73.7%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;i \cdot c \leq -5 \cdot 10^{+282}:\\ \;\;\;\;i \cdot c\\ \mathbf{elif}\;i \cdot c \leq -4 \cdot 10^{-62}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, t \cdot z\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;i \cdot c \leq 4 \cdot 10^{+237}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(t, z, y \cdot x\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;i \cdot c\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 4: 88.6% accurate, 0.7× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_1 := \mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, t \cdot z\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{if}\;i \cdot c \leq -2 \cdot 10^{-50}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_1\\ \mathbf{elif}\;i \cdot c \leq 10^{+18}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(z, t, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, y \cdot x\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_1\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_1 (fma b a (fma i c (* t z)))))
   (if (<= (* i c) -2e-50)
     t_1
     (if (<= (* i c) 1e+18) (fma z t (fma a b (* y x))) t_1))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double t_1 = fma(b, a, fma(i, c, (t * z)));
	double tmp;
	if ((i * c) <= -2e-50) {
		tmp = t_1;
	} else if ((i * c) <= 1e+18) {
		tmp = fma(z, t, fma(a, b, (y * x)));
	} else {
		tmp = t_1;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	t_1 = fma(b, a, fma(i, c, Float64(t * z)))
	tmp = 0.0
	if (Float64(i * c) <= -2e-50)
		tmp = t_1;
	elseif (Float64(i * c) <= 1e+18)
		tmp = fma(z, t, fma(a, b, Float64(y * x)));
	else
		tmp = t_1;
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := Block[{t$95$1 = N[(b * a + N[(i * c + N[(t * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[N[(i * c), $MachinePrecision], -2e-50], t$95$1, If[LessEqual[N[(i * c), $MachinePrecision], 1e+18], N[(z * t + N[(a * b + N[(y * x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], t$95$1]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (*.f64 c i) < -2.00000000000000002e-50 or 1e18 < (*.f64 c i)

   1. Initial program 95.4%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(c \cdot i + t \cdot z\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{b \cdot a} + \left(c \cdot i + t \cdot z\right) \]

      2. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, c \cdot i + t \cdot z\right)} \]

      3. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \color{blue}{i \cdot c} + t \cdot z\right) \]

      4. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, t \cdot z\right)}\right) \]

      5. lower-*.f64 92.9

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, \color{blue}{t \cdot z}\right)\right) \]

   5. Applied rewrites 92.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, t \cdot z\right)\right)} \]

   if -2.00000000000000002e-50 < (*.f64 c i) < 1e18

   1. Initial program 99.2%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Add Preprocessing
   3. Step-by-step derivation

      1. lift-+.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i} \]

      2. lift-+.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} + c \cdot i \]

      3. associate-+l+ N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + \left(a \cdot b + c \cdot i\right)} \]

      4. lift-+.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)} + \left(a \cdot b + c \cdot i\right) \]

      5. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(z \cdot t + x \cdot y\right)} + \left(a \cdot b + c \cdot i\right) \]

      6. associate-+l+ N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot t + \left(x \cdot y + \left(a \cdot b + c \cdot i\right)\right)} \]

      7. lift-*.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot t} + \left(x \cdot y + \left(a \cdot b + c \cdot i\right)\right) \]

      8. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, t, x \cdot y + \left(a \cdot b + c \cdot i\right)\right)} \]

      9. lift-*.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z, t, \color{blue}{x \cdot y} + \left(a \cdot b + c \cdot i\right)\right) \]

      10. *-commutative N/A

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z, t, \color{blue}{y \cdot x} + \left(a \cdot b + c \cdot i\right)\right) \]

      11. lower-fma.f64 N/A

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z, t, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, x, a \cdot b + c \cdot i\right)}\right) \]

      12. +-commutative N/A

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z, t, \mathsf{fma}\left(y, x, \color{blue}{c \cdot i + a \cdot b}\right)\right) \]

      13. lift-*.f64 N/A

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z, t, \mathsf{fma}\left(y, x, \color{blue}{c \cdot i} + a \cdot b\right)\right) \]

      14. *-commutative N/A

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z, t, \mathsf{fma}\left(y, x, \color{blue}{i \cdot c} + a \cdot b\right)\right) \]

      15. lower-fma.f64 99.2

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z, t, \mathsf{fma}\left(y, x, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, a \cdot b\right)}\right)\right) \]

      16. lift-*.f64 N/A

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z, t, \mathsf{fma}\left(y, x, \mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, \color{blue}{a \cdot b}\right)\right)\right) \]

      17. *-commutative N/A

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z, t, \mathsf{fma}\left(y, x, \mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, \color{blue}{b \cdot a}\right)\right)\right) \]

      18. lower-*.f64 99.2

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z, t, \mathsf{fma}\left(y, x, \mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, \color{blue}{b \cdot a}\right)\right)\right) \]

   4. Applied rewrites 99.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, t, \mathsf{fma}\left(y, x, \mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, b \cdot a\right)\right)\right)} \]

   5. Taylor expanded in c around 0

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z, t, \color{blue}{a \cdot b + x \cdot y}\right) \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z, t, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, x \cdot y\right)}\right) \]

      2. lower-*.f64 96.9

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z, t, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \color{blue}{x \cdot y}\right)\right) \]

   7. Applied rewrites 96.9%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z, t, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, x \cdot y\right)}\right) \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 94.8%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;i \cdot c \leq -2 \cdot 10^{-50}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, t \cdot z\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;i \cdot c \leq 10^{+18}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(z, t, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, y \cdot x\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, t \cdot z\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 5: 89.5% accurate, 0.7× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;b \cdot a \leq -4 \cdot 10^{+66}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, y \cdot x\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;b \cdot a \leq 10^{+17}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, \mathsf{fma}\left(t, z, y \cdot x\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, t \cdot z\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= (* b a) -4e+66)
   (fma b a (fma i c (* y x)))
   (if (<= (* b a) 1e+17)
     (fma i c (fma t z (* y x)))
     (fma b a (fma i c (* t z))))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double tmp;
	if ((b * a) <= -4e+66) {
		tmp = fma(b, a, fma(i, c, (y * x)));
	} else if ((b * a) <= 1e+17) {
		tmp = fma(i, c, fma(t, z, (y * x)));
	} else {
		tmp = fma(b, a, fma(i, c, (t * z)));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (Float64(b * a) <= -4e+66)
		tmp = fma(b, a, fma(i, c, Float64(y * x)));
	elseif (Float64(b * a) <= 1e+17)
		tmp = fma(i, c, fma(t, z, Float64(y * x)));
	else
		tmp = fma(b, a, fma(i, c, Float64(t * z)));
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := If[LessEqual[N[(b * a), $MachinePrecision], -4e+66], N[(b * a + N[(i * c + N[(y * x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[N[(b * a), $MachinePrecision], 1e+17], N[(i * c + N[(t * z + N[(y * x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(b * a + N[(i * c + N[(t * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if (*.f64 a b) < -3.99999999999999978e66

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in z around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(c \cdot i + x \cdot y\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{b \cdot a} + \left(c \cdot i + x \cdot y\right) \]

      2. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, c \cdot i + x \cdot y\right)} \]

      3. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \color{blue}{i \cdot c} + x \cdot y\right) \]

      4. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, x \cdot y\right)}\right) \]

      5. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, \color{blue}{y \cdot x}\right)\right) \]

      6. lower-*.f64 94.3

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, \color{blue}{y \cdot x}\right)\right) \]

   5. Applied rewrites 94.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, y \cdot x\right)\right)} \]

   if -3.99999999999999978e66 < (*.f64 a b) < 1e17

   1. Initial program 97.3%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in a around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c \cdot i + \left(t \cdot z + x \cdot y\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{i \cdot c} + \left(t \cdot z + x \cdot y\right) \]

      2. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, t \cdot z + x \cdot y\right)} \]

      3. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(t, z, x \cdot y\right)}\right) \]

      4. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, \mathsf{fma}\left(t, z, \color{blue}{y \cdot x}\right)\right) \]

      5. lower-*.f64 94.6

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, \mathsf{fma}\left(t, z, \color{blue}{y \cdot x}\right)\right) \]

   5. Applied rewrites 94.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, \mathsf{fma}\left(t, z, y \cdot x\right)\right)} \]

   if 1e17 < (*.f64 a b)

   1. Initial program 93.0%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(c \cdot i + t \cdot z\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{b \cdot a} + \left(c \cdot i + t \cdot z\right) \]

      2. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, c \cdot i + t \cdot z\right)} \]

      3. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \color{blue}{i \cdot c} + t \cdot z\right) \]

      4. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, t \cdot z\right)}\right) \]

      5. lower-*.f64 90.8

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, \color{blue}{t \cdot z}\right)\right) \]

   5. Applied rewrites 90.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, t \cdot z\right)\right)} \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 93.9%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;b \cdot a \leq -4 \cdot 10^{+66}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, y \cdot x\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;b \cdot a \leq 10^{+17}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, \mathsf{fma}\left(t, z, y \cdot x\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, t \cdot z\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 6: 90.1% accurate, 0.7× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_1 := \mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, t \cdot z\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{if}\;t \cdot z \leq -2 \cdot 10^{+33}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_1\\ \mathbf{elif}\;t \cdot z \leq 10^{+41}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, y \cdot x\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_1\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_1 (fma b a (fma i c (* t z)))))
   (if (<= (* t z) -2e+33)
     t_1
     (if (<= (* t z) 1e+41) (fma b a (fma i c (* y x))) t_1))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double t_1 = fma(b, a, fma(i, c, (t * z)));
	double tmp;
	if ((t * z) <= -2e+33) {
		tmp = t_1;
	} else if ((t * z) <= 1e+41) {
		tmp = fma(b, a, fma(i, c, (y * x)));
	} else {
		tmp = t_1;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	t_1 = fma(b, a, fma(i, c, Float64(t * z)))
	tmp = 0.0
	if (Float64(t * z) <= -2e+33)
		tmp = t_1;
	elseif (Float64(t * z) <= 1e+41)
		tmp = fma(b, a, fma(i, c, Float64(y * x)));
	else
		tmp = t_1;
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := Block[{t$95$1 = N[(b * a + N[(i * c + N[(t * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[N[(t * z), $MachinePrecision], -2e+33], t$95$1, If[LessEqual[N[(t * z), $MachinePrecision], 1e+41], N[(b * a + N[(i * c + N[(y * x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], t$95$1]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (*.f64 z t) < -1.9999999999999999e33 or 1.00000000000000001e41 < (*.f64 z t)

   1. Initial program 95.6%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(c \cdot i + t \cdot z\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{b \cdot a} + \left(c \cdot i + t \cdot z\right) \]

      2. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, c \cdot i + t \cdot z\right)} \]

      3. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \color{blue}{i \cdot c} + t \cdot z\right) \]

      4. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, t \cdot z\right)}\right) \]

      5. lower-*.f64 92.0

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, \color{blue}{t \cdot z}\right)\right) \]

   5. Applied rewrites 92.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, t \cdot z\right)\right)} \]

   if -1.9999999999999999e33 < (*.f64 z t) < 1.00000000000000001e41

   1. Initial program 98.5%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in z around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(c \cdot i + x \cdot y\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{b \cdot a} + \left(c \cdot i + x \cdot y\right) \]

      2. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, c \cdot i + x \cdot y\right)} \]

      3. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \color{blue}{i \cdot c} + x \cdot y\right) \]

      4. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, x \cdot y\right)}\right) \]

      5. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, \color{blue}{y \cdot x}\right)\right) \]

      6. lower-*.f64 94.9

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, \color{blue}{y \cdot x}\right)\right) \]

   5. Applied rewrites 94.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, y \cdot x\right)\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 93.6%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;t \cdot z \leq -2 \cdot 10^{+33}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, t \cdot z\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;t \cdot z \leq 10^{+41}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, y \cdot x\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, t \cdot z\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 7: 86.6% accurate, 0.7× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_1 := \mathsf{fma}\left(t, z, y \cdot x\right)\\ \mathbf{if}\;y \cdot x \leq -1 \cdot 10^{+245}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_1\\ \mathbf{elif}\;y \cdot x \leq 10^{+159}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, t \cdot z\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_1\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_1 (fma t z (* y x))))
   (if (<= (* y x) -1e+245)
     t_1
     (if (<= (* y x) 1e+159) (fma b a (fma i c (* t z))) t_1))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double t_1 = fma(t, z, (y * x));
	double tmp;
	if ((y * x) <= -1e+245) {
		tmp = t_1;
	} else if ((y * x) <= 1e+159) {
		tmp = fma(b, a, fma(i, c, (t * z)));
	} else {
		tmp = t_1;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	t_1 = fma(t, z, Float64(y * x))
	tmp = 0.0
	if (Float64(y * x) <= -1e+245)
		tmp = t_1;
	elseif (Float64(y * x) <= 1e+159)
		tmp = fma(b, a, fma(i, c, Float64(t * z)));
	else
		tmp = t_1;
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := Block[{t$95$1 = N[(t * z + N[(y * x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[N[(y * x), $MachinePrecision], -1e+245], t$95$1, If[LessEqual[N[(y * x), $MachinePrecision], 1e+159], N[(b * a + N[(i * c + N[(t * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], t$95$1]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (*.f64 x y) < -1.00000000000000004e245 or 9.9999999999999993e158 < (*.f64 x y)

   1. Initial program 89.1%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in a around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c \cdot i + \left(t \cdot z + x \cdot y\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{i \cdot c} + \left(t \cdot z + x \cdot y\right) \]

      2. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, t \cdot z + x \cdot y\right)} \]

      3. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(t, z, x \cdot y\right)}\right) \]

      4. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, \mathsf{fma}\left(t, z, \color{blue}{y \cdot x}\right)\right) \]

      5. lower-*.f64 89.3

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, \mathsf{fma}\left(t, z, \color{blue}{y \cdot x}\right)\right) \]

   5. Applied rewrites 89.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, \mathsf{fma}\left(t, z, y \cdot x\right)\right)} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

   7. Applied rewrites 89.3%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z, \color{blue}{t}, \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, x \cdot y\right)\right) \]

   8. Taylor expanded in c around 0

      \[\leadsto t \cdot z + \color{blue}{x \cdot y} \]
   9. Step-by-step derivation

   10. Applied rewrites 87.1%

       \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(t, \color{blue}{z}, y \cdot x\right) \]

   if -1.00000000000000004e245 < (*.f64 x y) < 9.9999999999999993e158

   1. Initial program 99.0%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(c \cdot i + t \cdot z\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{b \cdot a} + \left(c \cdot i + t \cdot z\right) \]

      2. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, c \cdot i + t \cdot z\right)} \]

      3. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \color{blue}{i \cdot c} + t \cdot z\right) \]

      4. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, t \cdot z\right)}\right) \]

      5. lower-*.f64 89.1

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, \color{blue}{t \cdot z}\right)\right) \]

   5. Applied rewrites 89.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, t \cdot z\right)\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 88.7%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \cdot x \leq -1 \cdot 10^{+245}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(t, z, y \cdot x\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;y \cdot x \leq 10^{+159}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, t \cdot z\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(t, z, y \cdot x\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 8: 63.2% accurate, 0.9× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;i \cdot c \leq -5 \cdot 10^{+282}:\\ \;\;\;\;i \cdot c\\ \mathbf{elif}\;i \cdot c \leq 4 \cdot 10^{+237}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, t \cdot z\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;i \cdot c\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= (* i c) -5e+282)
   (* i c)
   (if (<= (* i c) 4e+237) (fma a b (* t z)) (* i c))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double tmp;
	if ((i * c) <= -5e+282) {
		tmp = i * c;
	} else if ((i * c) <= 4e+237) {
		tmp = fma(a, b, (t * z));
	} else {
		tmp = i * c;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (Float64(i * c) <= -5e+282)
		tmp = Float64(i * c);
	elseif (Float64(i * c) <= 4e+237)
		tmp = fma(a, b, Float64(t * z));
	else
		tmp = Float64(i * c);
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := If[LessEqual[N[(i * c), $MachinePrecision], -5e+282], N[(i * c), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[N[(i * c), $MachinePrecision], 4e+237], N[(a * b + N[(t * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(i * c), $MachinePrecision]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (*.f64 c i) < -4.99999999999999978e282 or 3.99999999999999976e237 < (*.f64 c i)

   1. Initial program 91.1%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in c around inf

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c \cdot i} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{i \cdot c} \]

      2. lower-*.f64 88.3

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{i \cdot c} \]

   5. Applied rewrites 88.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{i \cdot c} \]

   if -4.99999999999999978e282 < (*.f64 c i) < 3.99999999999999976e237

   1. Initial program 98.5%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(c \cdot i + t \cdot z\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{b \cdot a} + \left(c \cdot i + t \cdot z\right) \]

      2. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, c \cdot i + t \cdot z\right)} \]

      3. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \color{blue}{i \cdot c} + t \cdot z\right) \]

      4. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, t \cdot z\right)}\right) \]

      5. lower-*.f64 75.5

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, \color{blue}{t \cdot z}\right)\right) \]

   5. Applied rewrites 75.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, t \cdot z\right)\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in c around 0

      \[\leadsto a \cdot b + \color{blue}{t \cdot z} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

   8. Applied rewrites 65.3%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(a, \color{blue}{b}, t \cdot z\right) \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 69.3%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;i \cdot c \leq -5 \cdot 10^{+282}:\\ \;\;\;\;i \cdot c\\ \mathbf{elif}\;i \cdot c \leq 4 \cdot 10^{+237}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, t \cdot z\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;i \cdot c\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 9: 42.9% accurate, 1.1× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;t \cdot z \leq -1 \cdot 10^{-28}:\\ \;\;\;\;t \cdot z\\ \mathbf{elif}\;t \cdot z \leq 2 \cdot 10^{+68}:\\ \;\;\;\;i \cdot c\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;t \cdot z\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= (* t z) -1e-28) (* t z) (if (<= (* t z) 2e+68) (* i c) (* t z))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double tmp;
	if ((t * z) <= -1e-28) {
		tmp = t * z;
	} else if ((t * z) <= 2e+68) {
		tmp = i * c;
	} else {
		tmp = t * z;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: c
    real(8), intent (in) :: i
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((t * z) <= (-1d-28)) then
        tmp = t * z
    else if ((t * z) <= 2d+68) then
        tmp = i * c
    else
        tmp = t * z
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double tmp;
	if ((t * z) <= -1e-28) {
		tmp = t * z;
	} else if ((t * z) <= 2e+68) {
		tmp = i * c;
	} else {
		tmp = t * z;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i):
	tmp = 0
	if (t * z) <= -1e-28:
		tmp = t * z
	elif (t * z) <= 2e+68:
		tmp = i * c
	else:
		tmp = t * z
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (Float64(t * z) <= -1e-28)
		tmp = Float64(t * z);
	elseif (Float64(t * z) <= 2e+68)
		tmp = Float64(i * c);
	else
		tmp = Float64(t * z);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((t * z) <= -1e-28)
		tmp = t * z;
	elseif ((t * z) <= 2e+68)
		tmp = i * c;
	else
		tmp = t * z;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := If[LessEqual[N[(t * z), $MachinePrecision], -1e-28], N[(t * z), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[N[(t * z), $MachinePrecision], 2e+68], N[(i * c), $MachinePrecision], N[(t * z), $MachinePrecision]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (*.f64 z t) < -9.99999999999999971e-29 or 1.99999999999999991e68 < (*.f64 z t)

   1. Initial program 95.2%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in a around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c \cdot i + \left(t \cdot z + x \cdot y\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{i \cdot c} + \left(t \cdot z + x \cdot y\right) \]

      2. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, t \cdot z + x \cdot y\right)} \]

      3. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(t, z, x \cdot y\right)}\right) \]

      4. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, \mathsf{fma}\left(t, z, \color{blue}{y \cdot x}\right)\right) \]

      5. lower-*.f64 81.4

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, \mathsf{fma}\left(t, z, \color{blue}{y \cdot x}\right)\right) \]

   5. Applied rewrites 81.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, \mathsf{fma}\left(t, z, y \cdot x\right)\right)} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

   7. Applied rewrites 79.8%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z, \color{blue}{t}, \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, x \cdot y\right)\right) \]

   8. Taylor expanded in z around inf

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{t \cdot z} \]
   9. Step-by-step derivation

      1. lower-*.f64 61.0

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{t \cdot z} \]

   10. Applied rewrites 61.0%

       \[\leadsto \color{blue}{t \cdot z} \]

   if -9.99999999999999971e-29 < (*.f64 z t) < 1.99999999999999991e68

   1. Initial program 99.2%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in c around inf

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c \cdot i} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{i \cdot c} \]

      2. lower-*.f64 37.5

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{i \cdot c} \]

   5. Applied rewrites 37.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{i \cdot c} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 49.1%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;t \cdot z \leq -1 \cdot 10^{-28}:\\ \;\;\;\;t \cdot z\\ \mathbf{elif}\;t \cdot z \leq 2 \cdot 10^{+68}:\\ \;\;\;\;i \cdot c\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;t \cdot z\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 10: 27.7% accurate, 5.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ i \cdot c \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b c i) :precision binary64 (* i c))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	return i * c;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: c
    real(8), intent (in) :: i
    code = i * c
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	return i * c;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i):
	return i * c

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	return Float64(i * c)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = i * c;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := N[(i * c), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 97.2%

   \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
2. Add Preprocessing

3. Taylor expanded in c around inf

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c \cdot i} \]
4. Step-by-step derivation

   1. *-commutative N/A

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{i \cdot c} \]

   2. lower-*.f64 25.6

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{i \cdot c} \]

5. Applied rewrites 25.6%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{i \cdot c} \]
6. Add Preprocessing

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2024327 
(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
  :name "Linear.V4:$cdot from linear-1.19.1.3, C"
  :precision binary64
  (+ (+ (+ (* x y) (* z t)) (* a b)) (* c i)))