Graphics.Rendering.Plot.Render.Plot.Legend:renderLegendOutside from plot-0.2.3.4, B

Percentage Accurate: 99.9% → 100.0%

Time: 7.1s

Alternatives: 12

Speedup: 1.2×

• 26.7% of points produce a very large (infinite) output. You may want to add a precondition.

Specification

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x \cdot \left(\left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) + t\right) + y \cdot 5 \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (+ (* x (+ (+ (+ (+ y z) z) y) t)) (* y 5.0)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return (x * ((((y + z) + z) + y) + t)) + (y * 5.0);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = (x * ((((y + z) + z) + y) + t)) + (y * 5.0d0)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return (x * ((((y + z) + z) + y) + t)) + (y * 5.0);
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return (x * ((((y + z) + z) + y) + t)) + (y * 5.0)

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(Float64(x * Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(y + z) + z) + y) + t)) + Float64(y * 5.0))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = (x * ((((y + z) + z) + y) + t)) + (y * 5.0);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(N[(x * N[(N[(N[(N[(y + z), $MachinePrecision] + z), $MachinePrecision] + y), $MachinePrecision] + t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(y * 5.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Initial Program: 99.9% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x \cdot \left(\left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) + t\right) + y \cdot 5 \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (+ (* x (+ (+ (+ (+ y z) z) y) t)) (* y 5.0)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return (x * ((((y + z) + z) + y) + t)) + (y * 5.0);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = (x * ((((y + z) + z) + y) + t)) + (y * 5.0d0)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return (x * ((((y + z) + z) + y) + t)) + (y * 5.0);
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return (x * ((((y + z) + z) + y) + t)) + (y * 5.0)

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(Float64(x * Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(y + z) + z) + y) + t)) + Float64(y * 5.0))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = (x * ((((y + z) + z) + y) + t)) + (y * 5.0);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(N[(x * N[(N[(N[(N[(y + z), $MachinePrecision] + z), $MachinePrecision] + y), $MachinePrecision] + t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(y * 5.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Alternative 1: 100.0% accurate, 1.1× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \mathsf{fma}\left(y, 5, \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 2, y\right) + \left(t + y\right)\right) \cdot x\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (fma y 5.0 (* (+ (fma z 2.0 y) (+ t y)) x)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return fma(y, 5.0, ((fma(z, 2.0, y) + (t + y)) * x));
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return fma(y, 5.0, Float64(Float64(fma(z, 2.0, y) + Float64(t + y)) * x))
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(y * 5.0 + N[(N[(N[(z * 2.0 + y), $MachinePrecision] + N[(t + y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] * x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 99.9%

   \[x \cdot \left(\left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) + t\right) + y \cdot 5 \]
2. Add Preprocessing
3. Step-by-step derivation

   1. lift-+.f64 N/A

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(\left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) + t\right) + y \cdot 5} \]

   2. +-commutative N/A

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot 5 + x \cdot \left(\left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) + t\right)} \]

   3. lift-*.f64 N/A

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot 5} + x \cdot \left(\left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) + t\right) \]

   4. lower-fma.f64 100.0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, 5, x \cdot \left(\left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) + t\right)\right)} \]

   5. lift-*.f64 N/A

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, 5, \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(\left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) + t\right)}\right) \]

   6. *-commutative N/A

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, 5, \color{blue}{\left(\left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) + t\right) \cdot x}\right) \]

   7. lower-*.f64 100.0

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, 5, \color{blue}{\left(\left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) + t\right) \cdot x}\right) \]

   8. lift-+.f64 N/A

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, 5, \color{blue}{\left(\left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) + t\right)} \cdot x\right) \]

   9. lift-+.f64 N/A

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, 5, \left(\color{blue}{\left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right)} + t\right) \cdot x\right) \]

   10. lift-+.f64 N/A

       \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, 5, \left(\left(\color{blue}{\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right)} + y\right) + t\right) \cdot x\right) \]

   11. associate-+l+ N/A

       \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, 5, \left(\color{blue}{\left(\left(y + z\right) + \left(z + y\right)\right)} + t\right) \cdot x\right) \]

   12. +-commutative N/A

       \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, 5, \left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + \color{blue}{\left(y + z\right)}\right) + t\right) \cdot x\right) \]

   13. lift-+.f64 N/A

       \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, 5, \left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + \color{blue}{\left(y + z\right)}\right) + t\right) \cdot x\right) \]

   14. count-2 N/A

       \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, 5, \left(\color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(y + z\right)} + t\right) \cdot x\right) \]

   15. lower-fma.f64 100.0

       \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, 5, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(2, y + z, t\right)} \cdot x\right) \]

   16. lift-+.f64 N/A

       \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, 5, \mathsf{fma}\left(2, \color{blue}{y + z}, t\right) \cdot x\right) \]

   17. +-commutative N/A

       \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, 5, \mathsf{fma}\left(2, \color{blue}{z + y}, t\right) \cdot x\right) \]

   18. lower-+.f64 100.0

       \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, 5, \mathsf{fma}\left(2, \color{blue}{z + y}, t\right) \cdot x\right) \]

4. Applied rewrites 100.0%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, 5, \mathsf{fma}\left(2, z + y, t\right) \cdot x\right)} \]
5. Step-by-step derivation

   1. lift-fma.f64 N/A

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, 5, \color{blue}{\left(2 \cdot \left(z + y\right) + t\right)} \cdot x\right) \]

   2. count-2-rev N/A

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, 5, \left(\color{blue}{\left(\left(z + y\right) + \left(z + y\right)\right)} + t\right) \cdot x\right) \]

   3. lift-+.f64 N/A

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, 5, \left(\left(\color{blue}{\left(z + y\right)} + \left(z + y\right)\right) + t\right) \cdot x\right) \]

   4. +-commutative N/A

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, 5, \left(\left(\color{blue}{\left(y + z\right)} + \left(z + y\right)\right) + t\right) \cdot x\right) \]

   5. lift-+.f64 N/A

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, 5, \left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + \color{blue}{\left(z + y\right)}\right) + t\right) \cdot x\right) \]

   6. associate-+l+ N/A

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, 5, \left(\color{blue}{\left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right)} + t\right) \cdot x\right) \]

   7. associate-+l+ N/A

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, 5, \color{blue}{\left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + \left(y + t\right)\right)} \cdot x\right) \]

   8. lower-+.f64 N/A

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, 5, \color{blue}{\left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + \left(y + t\right)\right)} \cdot x\right) \]

   9. associate-+l+ N/A

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, 5, \left(\color{blue}{\left(y + \left(z + z\right)\right)} + \left(y + t\right)\right) \cdot x\right) \]

   10. count-2-rev N/A

       \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, 5, \left(\left(y + \color{blue}{2 \cdot z}\right) + \left(y + t\right)\right) \cdot x\right) \]

   11. +-commutative N/A

       \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, 5, \left(\color{blue}{\left(2 \cdot z + y\right)} + \left(y + t\right)\right) \cdot x\right) \]

   12. *-commutative N/A

       \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, 5, \left(\left(\color{blue}{z \cdot 2} + y\right) + \left(y + t\right)\right) \cdot x\right) \]

   13. lower-fma.f64 N/A

       \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, 5, \left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 2, y\right)} + \left(y + t\right)\right) \cdot x\right) \]

   14. +-commutative N/A

       \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, 5, \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 2, y\right) + \color{blue}{\left(t + y\right)}\right) \cdot x\right) \]

   15. lower-+.f64 100.0

       \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, 5, \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 2, y\right) + \color{blue}{\left(t + y\right)}\right) \cdot x\right) \]

6. Applied rewrites 100.0%

   \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, 5, \color{blue}{\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 2, y\right) + \left(t + y\right)\right)} \cdot x\right) \]
7. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 2: 89.6% accurate, 0.8× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -2 \cdot 10^{+76} \lor \neg \left(z \leq 1.15 \cdot 10^{+93}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(2 \cdot x, z + y, 5 \cdot y\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(2, y, t\right), x, 5 \cdot y\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= z -2e+76) (not (<= z 1.15e+93)))
   (fma (* 2.0 x) (+ z y) (* 5.0 y))
   (fma (fma 2.0 y t) x (* 5.0 y))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z <= -2e+76) || !(z <= 1.15e+93)) {
		tmp = fma((2.0 * x), (z + y), (5.0 * y));
	} else {
		tmp = fma(fma(2.0, y, t), x, (5.0 * y));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((z <= -2e+76) || !(z <= 1.15e+93))
		tmp = fma(Float64(2.0 * x), Float64(z + y), Float64(5.0 * y));
	else
		tmp = fma(fma(2.0, y, t), x, Float64(5.0 * y));
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := If[Or[LessEqual[z, -2e+76], N[Not[LessEqual[z, 1.15e+93]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(N[(2.0 * x), $MachinePrecision] * N[(z + y), $MachinePrecision] + N[(5.0 * y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[(2.0 * y + t), $MachinePrecision] * x + N[(5.0 * y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if z < -2.0000000000000001e76 or 1.1500000000000001e93 < z

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[x \cdot \left(\left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) + t\right) + y \cdot 5 \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in t around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{5 \cdot y + x \cdot \left(2 \cdot y + 2 \cdot z\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(2 \cdot y + 2 \cdot z\right) + 5 \cdot y} \]

      2. distribute-lft-out N/A

         \[\leadsto x \cdot \color{blue}{\left(2 \cdot \left(y + z\right)\right)} + 5 \cdot y \]

      3. associate-*r* N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot 2\right) \cdot \left(y + z\right)} + 5 \cdot y \]

      4. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(2 \cdot x\right)} \cdot \left(y + z\right) + 5 \cdot y \]

      5. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(2 \cdot x, y + z, 5 \cdot y\right)} \]

      6. lower-*.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{2 \cdot x}, y + z, 5 \cdot y\right) \]

      7. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(2 \cdot x, \color{blue}{z + y}, 5 \cdot y\right) \]

      8. lower-+.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(2 \cdot x, \color{blue}{z + y}, 5 \cdot y\right) \]

      9. lower-*.f64 90.6

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(2 \cdot x, z + y, \color{blue}{5 \cdot y}\right) \]

   5. Applied rewrites 90.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(2 \cdot x, z + y, 5 \cdot y\right)} \]

   if -2.0000000000000001e76 < z < 1.1500000000000001e93

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[x \cdot \left(\left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) + t\right) + y \cdot 5 \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in z around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{5 \cdot y + x \cdot \left(t + 2 \cdot y\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(t + 2 \cdot y\right) + 5 \cdot y} \]

      2. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(t + 2 \cdot y\right) \cdot x} + 5 \cdot y \]

      3. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(t + 2 \cdot y, x, 5 \cdot y\right)} \]

      4. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{2 \cdot y + t}, x, 5 \cdot y\right) \]

      5. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(2, y, t\right)}, x, 5 \cdot y\right) \]

      6. lower-*.f64 93.4

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(2, y, t\right), x, \color{blue}{5 \cdot y}\right) \]

   5. Applied rewrites 93.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(2, y, t\right), x, 5 \cdot y\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 92.2%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -2 \cdot 10^{+76} \lor \neg \left(z \leq 1.15 \cdot 10^{+93}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(2 \cdot x, z + y, 5 \cdot y\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(2, y, t\right), x, 5 \cdot y\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 3: 87.5% accurate, 0.9× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -2 \cdot 10^{+76} \lor \neg \left(z \leq 1.15 \cdot 10^{+93}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(y, 5, \left(z + z\right) \cdot x\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(2, y, t\right), x, 5 \cdot y\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= z -2e+76) (not (<= z 1.15e+93)))
   (fma y 5.0 (* (+ z z) x))
   (fma (fma 2.0 y t) x (* 5.0 y))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z <= -2e+76) || !(z <= 1.15e+93)) {
		tmp = fma(y, 5.0, ((z + z) * x));
	} else {
		tmp = fma(fma(2.0, y, t), x, (5.0 * y));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((z <= -2e+76) || !(z <= 1.15e+93))
		tmp = fma(y, 5.0, Float64(Float64(z + z) * x));
	else
		tmp = fma(fma(2.0, y, t), x, Float64(5.0 * y));
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := If[Or[LessEqual[z, -2e+76], N[Not[LessEqual[z, 1.15e+93]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(y * 5.0 + N[(N[(z + z), $MachinePrecision] * x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[(2.0 * y + t), $MachinePrecision] * x + N[(5.0 * y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if z < -2.0000000000000001e76 or 1.1500000000000001e93 < z

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[x \cdot \left(\left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) + t\right) + y \cdot 5 \]
   2. Add Preprocessing
   3. Step-by-step derivation

      1. lift-+.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(\left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) + t\right) + y \cdot 5} \]

      2. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot 5 + x \cdot \left(\left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) + t\right)} \]

      3. lift-*.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot 5} + x \cdot \left(\left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) + t\right) \]

      4. lower-fma.f64 100.0

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, 5, x \cdot \left(\left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) + t\right)\right)} \]

      5. lift-*.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, 5, \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(\left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) + t\right)}\right) \]

      6. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, 5, \color{blue}{\left(\left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) + t\right) \cdot x}\right) \]

      7. lower-*.f64 100.0

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, 5, \color{blue}{\left(\left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) + t\right) \cdot x}\right) \]

      8. lift-+.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, 5, \color{blue}{\left(\left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) + t\right)} \cdot x\right) \]

      9. lift-+.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, 5, \left(\color{blue}{\left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right)} + t\right) \cdot x\right) \]

      10. lift-+.f64 N/A

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, 5, \left(\left(\color{blue}{\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right)} + y\right) + t\right) \cdot x\right) \]

      11. associate-+l+ N/A

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, 5, \left(\color{blue}{\left(\left(y + z\right) + \left(z + y\right)\right)} + t\right) \cdot x\right) \]

      12. +-commutative N/A

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, 5, \left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + \color{blue}{\left(y + z\right)}\right) + t\right) \cdot x\right) \]

      13. lift-+.f64 N/A

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, 5, \left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + \color{blue}{\left(y + z\right)}\right) + t\right) \cdot x\right) \]

      14. count-2 N/A

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, 5, \left(\color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(y + z\right)} + t\right) \cdot x\right) \]

      15. lower-fma.f64 100.0

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, 5, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(2, y + z, t\right)} \cdot x\right) \]

      16. lift-+.f64 N/A

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, 5, \mathsf{fma}\left(2, \color{blue}{y + z}, t\right) \cdot x\right) \]

      17. +-commutative N/A

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, 5, \mathsf{fma}\left(2, \color{blue}{z + y}, t\right) \cdot x\right) \]

      18. lower-+.f64 100.0

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, 5, \mathsf{fma}\left(2, \color{blue}{z + y}, t\right) \cdot x\right) \]

   4. Applied rewrites 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, 5, \mathsf{fma}\left(2, z + y, t\right) \cdot x\right)} \]

   5. Taylor expanded in z around inf

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, 5, \color{blue}{\left(2 \cdot z\right)} \cdot x\right) \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. lower-*.f64 86.4

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, 5, \color{blue}{\left(2 \cdot z\right)} \cdot x\right) \]

   7. Applied rewrites 86.4%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, 5, \color{blue}{\left(2 \cdot z\right)} \cdot x\right) \]
   8. Step-by-step derivation

   9. Applied rewrites 86.4%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, 5, \left(z + \color{blue}{z}\right) \cdot x\right) \]

   if -2.0000000000000001e76 < z < 1.1500000000000001e93

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[x \cdot \left(\left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) + t\right) + y \cdot 5 \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in z around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{5 \cdot y + x \cdot \left(t + 2 \cdot y\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(t + 2 \cdot y\right) + 5 \cdot y} \]

      2. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(t + 2 \cdot y\right) \cdot x} + 5 \cdot y \]

      3. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(t + 2 \cdot y, x, 5 \cdot y\right)} \]

      4. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{2 \cdot y + t}, x, 5 \cdot y\right) \]

      5. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(2, y, t\right)}, x, 5 \cdot y\right) \]

      6. lower-*.f64 93.4

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(2, y, t\right), x, \color{blue}{5 \cdot y}\right) \]

   5. Applied rewrites 93.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(2, y, t\right), x, 5 \cdot y\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 90.5%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -2 \cdot 10^{+76} \lor \neg \left(z \leq 1.15 \cdot 10^{+93}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(y, 5, \left(z + z\right) \cdot x\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(2, y, t\right), x, 5 \cdot y\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 4: 56.0% accurate, 0.9× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_1 := \left(z \cdot x\right) \cdot 2\\ \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -2 \cdot 10^{+76}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_1\\ \mathbf{elif}\;z \leq -2.85 \cdot 10^{-98}:\\ \;\;\;\;t \cdot x\\ \mathbf{elif}\;z \leq 7.6 \cdot 10^{+92}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(2, x, 5\right) \cdot y\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_1\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_1 (* (* z x) 2.0)))
   (if (<= z -2e+76)
     t_1
     (if (<= z -2.85e-98)
       (* t x)
       (if (<= z 7.6e+92) (* (fma 2.0 x 5.0) y) t_1)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double t_1 = (z * x) * 2.0;
	double tmp;
	if (z <= -2e+76) {
		tmp = t_1;
	} else if (z <= -2.85e-98) {
		tmp = t * x;
	} else if (z <= 7.6e+92) {
		tmp = fma(2.0, x, 5.0) * y;
	} else {
		tmp = t_1;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	t_1 = Float64(Float64(z * x) * 2.0)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (z <= -2e+76)
		tmp = t_1;
	elseif (z <= -2.85e-98)
		tmp = Float64(t * x);
	elseif (z <= 7.6e+92)
		tmp = Float64(fma(2.0, x, 5.0) * y);
	else
		tmp = t_1;
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := Block[{t$95$1 = N[(N[(z * x), $MachinePrecision] * 2.0), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[z, -2e+76], t$95$1, If[LessEqual[z, -2.85e-98], N[(t * x), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[z, 7.6e+92], N[(N[(2.0 * x + 5.0), $MachinePrecision] * y), $MachinePrecision], t$95$1]]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if z < -2.0000000000000001e76 or 7.6000000000000001e92 < z

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[x \cdot \left(\left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) + t\right) + y \cdot 5 \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in z around inf

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(x \cdot z\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot z\right) \cdot 2} \]

      2. lower-*.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot z\right) \cdot 2} \]

      3. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(z \cdot x\right)} \cdot 2 \]

      4. lower-*.f64 71.4

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(z \cdot x\right)} \cdot 2 \]

   5. Applied rewrites 71.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(z \cdot x\right) \cdot 2} \]

   if -2.0000000000000001e76 < z < -2.8499999999999999e-98

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[x \cdot \left(\left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) + t\right) + y \cdot 5 \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in t around inf

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{t \cdot x} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. lower-*.f64 48.1

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{t \cdot x} \]

   5. Applied rewrites 48.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{t \cdot x} \]

   if -2.8499999999999999e-98 < z < 7.6000000000000001e92

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[x \cdot \left(\left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) + t\right) + y \cdot 5 \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in y around inf

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(5 + 2 \cdot x\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(5 + 2 \cdot x\right) \cdot y} \]

      2. lower-*.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(5 + 2 \cdot x\right) \cdot y} \]

      3. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(2 \cdot x + 5\right)} \cdot y \]

      4. lower-fma.f64 66.9

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(2, x, 5\right)} \cdot y \]

   5. Applied rewrites 66.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(2, x, 5\right) \cdot y} \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.
4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 5: 77.6% accurate, 0.9× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -8.4 \cdot 10^{+86} \lor \neg \left(y \leq 2.5 \cdot 10^{-11}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(y, 5, \left(y + y\right) \cdot x\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(z \cdot 2, x, x \cdot t\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= y -8.4e+86) (not (<= y 2.5e-11)))
   (fma y 5.0 (* (+ y y) x))
   (fma (* z 2.0) x (* x t))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if ((y <= -8.4e+86) || !(y <= 2.5e-11)) {
		tmp = fma(y, 5.0, ((y + y) * x));
	} else {
		tmp = fma((z * 2.0), x, (x * t));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((y <= -8.4e+86) || !(y <= 2.5e-11))
		tmp = fma(y, 5.0, Float64(Float64(y + y) * x));
	else
		tmp = fma(Float64(z * 2.0), x, Float64(x * t));
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := If[Or[LessEqual[y, -8.4e+86], N[Not[LessEqual[y, 2.5e-11]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(y * 5.0 + N[(N[(y + y), $MachinePrecision] * x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[(z * 2.0), $MachinePrecision] * x + N[(x * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if y < -8.3999999999999996e86 or 2.50000000000000009e-11 < y

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[x \cdot \left(\left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) + t\right) + y \cdot 5 \]
   2. Add Preprocessing
   3. Step-by-step derivation

      1. lift-+.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(\left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) + t\right) + y \cdot 5} \]

      2. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot 5 + x \cdot \left(\left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) + t\right)} \]

      3. lift-*.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot 5} + x \cdot \left(\left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) + t\right) \]

      4. lower-fma.f64 100.0

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, 5, x \cdot \left(\left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) + t\right)\right)} \]

      5. lift-*.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, 5, \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(\left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) + t\right)}\right) \]

      6. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, 5, \color{blue}{\left(\left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) + t\right) \cdot x}\right) \]

      7. lower-*.f64 100.0

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, 5, \color{blue}{\left(\left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) + t\right) \cdot x}\right) \]

      8. lift-+.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, 5, \color{blue}{\left(\left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) + t\right)} \cdot x\right) \]

      9. lift-+.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, 5, \left(\color{blue}{\left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right)} + t\right) \cdot x\right) \]

      10. lift-+.f64 N/A

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, 5, \left(\left(\color{blue}{\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right)} + y\right) + t\right) \cdot x\right) \]

      11. associate-+l+ N/A

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, 5, \left(\color{blue}{\left(\left(y + z\right) + \left(z + y\right)\right)} + t\right) \cdot x\right) \]

      12. +-commutative N/A

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, 5, \left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + \color{blue}{\left(y + z\right)}\right) + t\right) \cdot x\right) \]

      13. lift-+.f64 N/A

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, 5, \left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + \color{blue}{\left(y + z\right)}\right) + t\right) \cdot x\right) \]

      14. count-2 N/A

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, 5, \left(\color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(y + z\right)} + t\right) \cdot x\right) \]

      15. lower-fma.f64 100.0

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, 5, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(2, y + z, t\right)} \cdot x\right) \]

      16. lift-+.f64 N/A

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, 5, \mathsf{fma}\left(2, \color{blue}{y + z}, t\right) \cdot x\right) \]

      17. +-commutative N/A

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, 5, \mathsf{fma}\left(2, \color{blue}{z + y}, t\right) \cdot x\right) \]

      18. lower-+.f64 100.0

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, 5, \mathsf{fma}\left(2, \color{blue}{z + y}, t\right) \cdot x\right) \]

   4. Applied rewrites 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, 5, \mathsf{fma}\left(2, z + y, t\right) \cdot x\right)} \]

   5. Taylor expanded in y around inf

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, 5, \color{blue}{\left(2 \cdot y\right)} \cdot x\right) \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. lower-*.f64 81.0

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, 5, \color{blue}{\left(2 \cdot y\right)} \cdot x\right) \]

   7. Applied rewrites 81.0%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, 5, \color{blue}{\left(2 \cdot y\right)} \cdot x\right) \]
   8. Step-by-step derivation

   9. Applied rewrites 81.0%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, 5, \left(y + \color{blue}{y}\right) \cdot x\right) \]

   if -8.3999999999999996e86 < y < 2.50000000000000009e-11

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[x \cdot \left(\left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) + t\right) + y \cdot 5 \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in y around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(t + 2 \cdot z\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(t + 2 \cdot z\right) \cdot x} \]

      2. lower-*.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(t + 2 \cdot z\right) \cdot x} \]

      3. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(2 \cdot z + t\right)} \cdot x \]

      4. lower-fma.f64 86.1

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(2, z, t\right)} \cdot x \]

   5. Applied rewrites 86.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(2, z, t\right) \cdot x} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

   7. Applied rewrites 86.1%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z \cdot 2, \color{blue}{x}, x \cdot t\right) \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 83.9%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -8.4 \cdot 10^{+86} \lor \neg \left(y \leq 2.5 \cdot 10^{-11}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(y, 5, \left(y + y\right) \cdot x\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(z \cdot 2, x, x \cdot t\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 6: 44.9% accurate, 0.9× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_1 := \left(z \cdot x\right) \cdot 2\\ \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -2 \cdot 10^{+76}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_1\\ \mathbf{elif}\;z \leq -6.6 \cdot 10^{-99}:\\ \;\;\;\;t \cdot x\\ \mathbf{elif}\;z \leq 7.2 \cdot 10^{+91}:\\ \;\;\;\;5 \cdot y\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_1\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_1 (* (* z x) 2.0)))
   (if (<= z -2e+76)
     t_1
     (if (<= z -6.6e-99) (* t x) (if (<= z 7.2e+91) (* 5.0 y) t_1)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double t_1 = (z * x) * 2.0;
	double tmp;
	if (z <= -2e+76) {
		tmp = t_1;
	} else if (z <= -6.6e-99) {
		tmp = t * x;
	} else if (z <= 7.2e+91) {
		tmp = 5.0 * y;
	} else {
		tmp = t_1;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: t_1
    real(8) :: tmp
    t_1 = (z * x) * 2.0d0
    if (z <= (-2d+76)) then
        tmp = t_1
    else if (z <= (-6.6d-99)) then
        tmp = t * x
    else if (z <= 7.2d+91) then
        tmp = 5.0d0 * y
    else
        tmp = t_1
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double t_1 = (z * x) * 2.0;
	double tmp;
	if (z <= -2e+76) {
		tmp = t_1;
	} else if (z <= -6.6e-99) {
		tmp = t * x;
	} else if (z <= 7.2e+91) {
		tmp = 5.0 * y;
	} else {
		tmp = t_1;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	t_1 = (z * x) * 2.0
	tmp = 0
	if z <= -2e+76:
		tmp = t_1
	elif z <= -6.6e-99:
		tmp = t * x
	elif z <= 7.2e+91:
		tmp = 5.0 * y
	else:
		tmp = t_1
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	t_1 = Float64(Float64(z * x) * 2.0)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (z <= -2e+76)
		tmp = t_1;
	elseif (z <= -6.6e-99)
		tmp = Float64(t * x);
	elseif (z <= 7.2e+91)
		tmp = Float64(5.0 * y);
	else
		tmp = t_1;
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t)
	t_1 = (z * x) * 2.0;
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (z <= -2e+76)
		tmp = t_1;
	elseif (z <= -6.6e-99)
		tmp = t * x;
	elseif (z <= 7.2e+91)
		tmp = 5.0 * y;
	else
		tmp = t_1;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := Block[{t$95$1 = N[(N[(z * x), $MachinePrecision] * 2.0), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[z, -2e+76], t$95$1, If[LessEqual[z, -6.6e-99], N[(t * x), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[z, 7.2e+91], N[(5.0 * y), $MachinePrecision], t$95$1]]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if z < -2.0000000000000001e76 or 7.2e91 < z

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[x \cdot \left(\left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) + t\right) + y \cdot 5 \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in z around inf

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(x \cdot z\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot z\right) \cdot 2} \]

      2. lower-*.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot z\right) \cdot 2} \]

      3. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(z \cdot x\right)} \cdot 2 \]

      4. lower-*.f64 71.4

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(z \cdot x\right)} \cdot 2 \]

   5. Applied rewrites 71.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(z \cdot x\right) \cdot 2} \]

   if -2.0000000000000001e76 < z < -6.59999999999999973e-99

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[x \cdot \left(\left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) + t\right) + y \cdot 5 \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in t around inf

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{t \cdot x} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. lower-*.f64 48.1

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{t \cdot x} \]

   5. Applied rewrites 48.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{t \cdot x} \]

   if -6.59999999999999973e-99 < z < 7.2e91

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[x \cdot \left(\left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) + t\right) + y \cdot 5 \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{5 \cdot y} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. lower-*.f64 45.8

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{5 \cdot y} \]

   5. Applied rewrites 45.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{5 \cdot y} \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.
4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 7: 78.3% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -8.4 \cdot 10^{+86} \lor \neg \left(y \leq 2.5 \cdot 10^{-11}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(y, 5, \left(y + y\right) \cdot x\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(2, z, t\right) \cdot x\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= y -8.4e+86) (not (<= y 2.5e-11)))
   (fma y 5.0 (* (+ y y) x))
   (* (fma 2.0 z t) x)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if ((y <= -8.4e+86) || !(y <= 2.5e-11)) {
		tmp = fma(y, 5.0, ((y + y) * x));
	} else {
		tmp = fma(2.0, z, t) * x;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((y <= -8.4e+86) || !(y <= 2.5e-11))
		tmp = fma(y, 5.0, Float64(Float64(y + y) * x));
	else
		tmp = Float64(fma(2.0, z, t) * x);
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := If[Or[LessEqual[y, -8.4e+86], N[Not[LessEqual[y, 2.5e-11]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(y * 5.0 + N[(N[(y + y), $MachinePrecision] * x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[(2.0 * z + t), $MachinePrecision] * x), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if y < -8.3999999999999996e86 or 2.50000000000000009e-11 < y

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[x \cdot \left(\left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) + t\right) + y \cdot 5 \]
   2. Add Preprocessing
   3. Step-by-step derivation

      1. lift-+.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(\left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) + t\right) + y \cdot 5} \]

      2. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot 5 + x \cdot \left(\left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) + t\right)} \]

      3. lift-*.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot 5} + x \cdot \left(\left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) + t\right) \]

      4. lower-fma.f64 100.0

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, 5, x \cdot \left(\left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) + t\right)\right)} \]

      5. lift-*.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, 5, \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(\left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) + t\right)}\right) \]

      6. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, 5, \color{blue}{\left(\left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) + t\right) \cdot x}\right) \]

      7. lower-*.f64 100.0

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, 5, \color{blue}{\left(\left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) + t\right) \cdot x}\right) \]

      8. lift-+.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, 5, \color{blue}{\left(\left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) + t\right)} \cdot x\right) \]

      9. lift-+.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, 5, \left(\color{blue}{\left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right)} + t\right) \cdot x\right) \]

      10. lift-+.f64 N/A

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, 5, \left(\left(\color{blue}{\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right)} + y\right) + t\right) \cdot x\right) \]

      11. associate-+l+ N/A

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, 5, \left(\color{blue}{\left(\left(y + z\right) + \left(z + y\right)\right)} + t\right) \cdot x\right) \]

      12. +-commutative N/A

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, 5, \left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + \color{blue}{\left(y + z\right)}\right) + t\right) \cdot x\right) \]

      13. lift-+.f64 N/A

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, 5, \left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + \color{blue}{\left(y + z\right)}\right) + t\right) \cdot x\right) \]

      14. count-2 N/A

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, 5, \left(\color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(y + z\right)} + t\right) \cdot x\right) \]

      15. lower-fma.f64 100.0

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, 5, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(2, y + z, t\right)} \cdot x\right) \]

      16. lift-+.f64 N/A

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, 5, \mathsf{fma}\left(2, \color{blue}{y + z}, t\right) \cdot x\right) \]

      17. +-commutative N/A

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, 5, \mathsf{fma}\left(2, \color{blue}{z + y}, t\right) \cdot x\right) \]

      18. lower-+.f64 100.0

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, 5, \mathsf{fma}\left(2, \color{blue}{z + y}, t\right) \cdot x\right) \]

   4. Applied rewrites 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, 5, \mathsf{fma}\left(2, z + y, t\right) \cdot x\right)} \]

   5. Taylor expanded in y around inf

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, 5, \color{blue}{\left(2 \cdot y\right)} \cdot x\right) \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. lower-*.f64 81.0

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, 5, \color{blue}{\left(2 \cdot y\right)} \cdot x\right) \]

   7. Applied rewrites 81.0%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, 5, \color{blue}{\left(2 \cdot y\right)} \cdot x\right) \]
   8. Step-by-step derivation

   9. Applied rewrites 81.0%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, 5, \left(y + \color{blue}{y}\right) \cdot x\right) \]

   if -8.3999999999999996e86 < y < 2.50000000000000009e-11

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[x \cdot \left(\left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) + t\right) + y \cdot 5 \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in y around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(t + 2 \cdot z\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(t + 2 \cdot z\right) \cdot x} \]

      2. lower-*.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(t + 2 \cdot z\right) \cdot x} \]

      3. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(2 \cdot z + t\right)} \cdot x \]

      4. lower-fma.f64 86.1

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(2, z, t\right)} \cdot x \]

   5. Applied rewrites 86.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(2, z, t\right) \cdot x} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 83.9%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -8.4 \cdot 10^{+86} \lor \neg \left(y \leq 2.5 \cdot 10^{-11}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(y, 5, \left(y + y\right) \cdot x\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(2, z, t\right) \cdot x\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 8: 78.3% accurate, 1.1× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -8.4 \cdot 10^{+86} \lor \neg \left(y \leq 2.5 \cdot 10^{-11}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(2, x, 5\right) \cdot y\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(2, z, t\right) \cdot x\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= y -8.4e+86) (not (<= y 2.5e-11)))
   (* (fma 2.0 x 5.0) y)
   (* (fma 2.0 z t) x)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if ((y <= -8.4e+86) || !(y <= 2.5e-11)) {
		tmp = fma(2.0, x, 5.0) * y;
	} else {
		tmp = fma(2.0, z, t) * x;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((y <= -8.4e+86) || !(y <= 2.5e-11))
		tmp = Float64(fma(2.0, x, 5.0) * y);
	else
		tmp = Float64(fma(2.0, z, t) * x);
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := If[Or[LessEqual[y, -8.4e+86], N[Not[LessEqual[y, 2.5e-11]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(N[(2.0 * x + 5.0), $MachinePrecision] * y), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[(2.0 * z + t), $MachinePrecision] * x), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if y < -8.3999999999999996e86 or 2.50000000000000009e-11 < y

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[x \cdot \left(\left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) + t\right) + y \cdot 5 \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in y around inf

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(5 + 2 \cdot x\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(5 + 2 \cdot x\right) \cdot y} \]

      2. lower-*.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(5 + 2 \cdot x\right) \cdot y} \]

      3. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(2 \cdot x + 5\right)} \cdot y \]

      4. lower-fma.f64 81.0

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(2, x, 5\right)} \cdot y \]

   5. Applied rewrites 81.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(2, x, 5\right) \cdot y} \]

   if -8.3999999999999996e86 < y < 2.50000000000000009e-11

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[x \cdot \left(\left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) + t\right) + y \cdot 5 \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in y around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(t + 2 \cdot z\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(t + 2 \cdot z\right) \cdot x} \]

      2. lower-*.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(t + 2 \cdot z\right) \cdot x} \]

      3. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(2 \cdot z + t\right)} \cdot x \]

      4. lower-fma.f64 86.1

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(2, z, t\right)} \cdot x \]

   5. Applied rewrites 86.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(2, z, t\right) \cdot x} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 83.9%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -8.4 \cdot 10^{+86} \lor \neg \left(y \leq 2.5 \cdot 10^{-11}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(2, x, 5\right) \cdot y\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(2, z, t\right) \cdot x\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 9: 47.0% accurate, 1.1× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -1.55 \cdot 10^{-24}:\\ \;\;\;\;t \cdot x\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \leq 1.5 \cdot 10^{-7}:\\ \;\;\;\;5 \cdot y\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(x \cdot y\right) \cdot 2\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= x -1.55e-24) (* t x) (if (<= x 1.5e-7) (* 5.0 y) (* (* x y) 2.0))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (x <= -1.55e-24) {
		tmp = t * x;
	} else if (x <= 1.5e-7) {
		tmp = 5.0 * y;
	} else {
		tmp = (x * y) * 2.0;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (x <= (-1.55d-24)) then
        tmp = t * x
    else if (x <= 1.5d-7) then
        tmp = 5.0d0 * y
    else
        tmp = (x * y) * 2.0d0
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (x <= -1.55e-24) {
		tmp = t * x;
	} else if (x <= 1.5e-7) {
		tmp = 5.0 * y;
	} else {
		tmp = (x * y) * 2.0;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	tmp = 0
	if x <= -1.55e-24:
		tmp = t * x
	elif x <= 1.5e-7:
		tmp = 5.0 * y
	else:
		tmp = (x * y) * 2.0
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (x <= -1.55e-24)
		tmp = Float64(t * x);
	elseif (x <= 1.5e-7)
		tmp = Float64(5.0 * y);
	else
		tmp = Float64(Float64(x * y) * 2.0);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (x <= -1.55e-24)
		tmp = t * x;
	elseif (x <= 1.5e-7)
		tmp = 5.0 * y;
	else
		tmp = (x * y) * 2.0;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := If[LessEqual[x, -1.55e-24], N[(t * x), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[x, 1.5e-7], N[(5.0 * y), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision] * 2.0), $MachinePrecision]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if x < -1.55e-24

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[x \cdot \left(\left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) + t\right) + y \cdot 5 \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in t around inf

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{t \cdot x} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. lower-*.f64 48.5

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{t \cdot x} \]

   5. Applied rewrites 48.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{t \cdot x} \]

   if -1.55e-24 < x < 1.4999999999999999e-7

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[x \cdot \left(\left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) + t\right) + y \cdot 5 \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{5 \cdot y} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. lower-*.f64 53.0

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{5 \cdot y} \]

   5. Applied rewrites 53.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{5 \cdot y} \]

   if 1.4999999999999999e-7 < x

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[x \cdot \left(\left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) + t\right) + y \cdot 5 \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in t around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{5 \cdot y + x \cdot \left(2 \cdot y + 2 \cdot z\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(2 \cdot y + 2 \cdot z\right) + 5 \cdot y} \]

      2. distribute-lft-out N/A

         \[\leadsto x \cdot \color{blue}{\left(2 \cdot \left(y + z\right)\right)} + 5 \cdot y \]

      3. associate-*r* N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot 2\right) \cdot \left(y + z\right)} + 5 \cdot y \]

      4. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(2 \cdot x\right)} \cdot \left(y + z\right) + 5 \cdot y \]

      5. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(2 \cdot x, y + z, 5 \cdot y\right)} \]

      6. lower-*.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{2 \cdot x}, y + z, 5 \cdot y\right) \]

      7. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(2 \cdot x, \color{blue}{z + y}, 5 \cdot y\right) \]

      8. lower-+.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(2 \cdot x, \color{blue}{z + y}, 5 \cdot y\right) \]

      9. lower-*.f64 75.8

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(2 \cdot x, z + y, \color{blue}{5 \cdot y}\right) \]

   5. Applied rewrites 75.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(2 \cdot x, z + y, 5 \cdot y\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in x around inf

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot \left(y + z\right)\right)} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

   8. Applied rewrites 75.8%

      \[\leadsto \left(\left(z + y\right) \cdot x\right) \cdot \color{blue}{2} \]

   9. Taylor expanded in y around inf

      \[\leadsto \left(x \cdot y\right) \cdot 2 \]
   10. Step-by-step derivation

   11. Applied rewrites 45.8%

       \[\leadsto \left(x \cdot y\right) \cdot 2 \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.
4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 10: 100.0% accurate, 1.2× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \mathsf{fma}\left(y, 5, \mathsf{fma}\left(2, z + y, t\right) \cdot x\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t) :precision binary64 (fma y 5.0 (* (fma 2.0 (+ z y) t) x)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return fma(y, 5.0, (fma(2.0, (z + y), t) * x));
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return fma(y, 5.0, Float64(fma(2.0, Float64(z + y), t) * x))
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(y * 5.0 + N[(N[(2.0 * N[(z + y), $MachinePrecision] + t), $MachinePrecision] * x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 99.9%

   \[x \cdot \left(\left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) + t\right) + y \cdot 5 \]
2. Add Preprocessing
3. Step-by-step derivation

   1. lift-+.f64 N/A

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(\left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) + t\right) + y \cdot 5} \]

   2. +-commutative N/A

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot 5 + x \cdot \left(\left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) + t\right)} \]

   3. lift-*.f64 N/A

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot 5} + x \cdot \left(\left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) + t\right) \]

   4. lower-fma.f64 100.0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, 5, x \cdot \left(\left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) + t\right)\right)} \]

   5. lift-*.f64 N/A

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, 5, \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(\left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) + t\right)}\right) \]

   6. *-commutative N/A

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, 5, \color{blue}{\left(\left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) + t\right) \cdot x}\right) \]

   7. lower-*.f64 100.0

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, 5, \color{blue}{\left(\left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) + t\right) \cdot x}\right) \]

   8. lift-+.f64 N/A

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, 5, \color{blue}{\left(\left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) + t\right)} \cdot x\right) \]

   9. lift-+.f64 N/A

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, 5, \left(\color{blue}{\left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right)} + t\right) \cdot x\right) \]

   10. lift-+.f64 N/A

       \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, 5, \left(\left(\color{blue}{\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right)} + y\right) + t\right) \cdot x\right) \]

   11. associate-+l+ N/A

       \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, 5, \left(\color{blue}{\left(\left(y + z\right) + \left(z + y\right)\right)} + t\right) \cdot x\right) \]

   12. +-commutative N/A

       \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, 5, \left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + \color{blue}{\left(y + z\right)}\right) + t\right) \cdot x\right) \]

   13. lift-+.f64 N/A

       \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, 5, \left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + \color{blue}{\left(y + z\right)}\right) + t\right) \cdot x\right) \]

   14. count-2 N/A

       \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, 5, \left(\color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(y + z\right)} + t\right) \cdot x\right) \]

   15. lower-fma.f64 100.0

       \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, 5, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(2, y + z, t\right)} \cdot x\right) \]

   16. lift-+.f64 N/A

       \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, 5, \mathsf{fma}\left(2, \color{blue}{y + z}, t\right) \cdot x\right) \]

   17. +-commutative N/A

       \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, 5, \mathsf{fma}\left(2, \color{blue}{z + y}, t\right) \cdot x\right) \]

   18. lower-+.f64 100.0

       \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, 5, \mathsf{fma}\left(2, \color{blue}{z + y}, t\right) \cdot x\right) \]

4. Applied rewrites 100.0%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, 5, \mathsf{fma}\left(2, z + y, t\right) \cdot x\right)} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 11: 46.2% accurate, 1.4× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -1.55 \cdot 10^{-24} \lor \neg \left(x \leq 8.2 \cdot 10^{-131}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;t \cdot x\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;5 \cdot y\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= x -1.55e-24) (not (<= x 8.2e-131))) (* t x) (* 5.0 y)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x <= -1.55e-24) || !(x <= 8.2e-131)) {
		tmp = t * x;
	} else {
		tmp = 5.0 * y;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((x <= (-1.55d-24)) .or. (.not. (x <= 8.2d-131))) then
        tmp = t * x
    else
        tmp = 5.0d0 * y
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x <= -1.55e-24) || !(x <= 8.2e-131)) {
		tmp = t * x;
	} else {
		tmp = 5.0 * y;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	tmp = 0
	if (x <= -1.55e-24) or not (x <= 8.2e-131):
		tmp = t * x
	else:
		tmp = 5.0 * y
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((x <= -1.55e-24) || !(x <= 8.2e-131))
		tmp = Float64(t * x);
	else
		tmp = Float64(5.0 * y);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((x <= -1.55e-24) || ~((x <= 8.2e-131)))
		tmp = t * x;
	else
		tmp = 5.0 * y;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := If[Or[LessEqual[x, -1.55e-24], N[Not[LessEqual[x, 8.2e-131]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(t * x), $MachinePrecision], N[(5.0 * y), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if x < -1.55e-24 or 8.2000000000000004e-131 < x

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[x \cdot \left(\left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) + t\right) + y \cdot 5 \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in t around inf

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{t \cdot x} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. lower-*.f64 40.2

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{t \cdot x} \]

   5. Applied rewrites 40.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{t \cdot x} \]

   if -1.55e-24 < x < 8.2000000000000004e-131

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[x \cdot \left(\left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) + t\right) + y \cdot 5 \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{5 \cdot y} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. lower-*.f64 59.6

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{5 \cdot y} \]

   5. Applied rewrites 59.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{5 \cdot y} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 49.0%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -1.55 \cdot 10^{-24} \lor \neg \left(x \leq 8.2 \cdot 10^{-131}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;t \cdot x\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;5 \cdot y\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 12: 29.8% accurate, 4.3× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ 5 \cdot y \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t) :precision binary64 (* 5.0 y))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return 5.0 * y;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = 5.0d0 * y
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return 5.0 * y;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return 5.0 * y

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(5.0 * y)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 5.0 * y;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(5.0 * y), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 99.9%

   \[x \cdot \left(\left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) + t\right) + y \cdot 5 \]
2. Add Preprocessing

3. Taylor expanded in x around 0

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{5 \cdot y} \]
4. Step-by-step derivation

   1. lower-*.f64 31.8

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{5 \cdot y} \]

5. Applied rewrites 31.8%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{5 \cdot y} \]
6. Add Preprocessing

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2024326 
(FPCore (x y z t)
  :name "Graphics.Rendering.Plot.Render.Plot.Legend:renderLegendOutside from plot-0.2.3.4, B"
  :precision binary64
  (+ (* x (+ (+ (+ (+ y z) z) y) t)) (* y 5.0)))