Jmat.Real.lambertw, newton loop step

Percentage Accurate: 78.6% → 96.1%
Time: 7.5s
Alternatives: 9
Speedup: 55.2×

Specification

?
\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_0 := wj \cdot e^{wj}\\ wj - \frac{t\_0 - x}{e^{wj} + t\_0} \end{array} \end{array} \]
(FPCore (wj x)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_0 (* wj (exp wj)))) (- wj (/ (- t_0 x) (+ (exp wj) t_0)))))
double code(double wj, double x) {
	double t_0 = wj * exp(wj);
	return wj - ((t_0 - x) / (exp(wj) + t_0));
}
real(8) function code(wj, x)
    real(8), intent (in) :: wj
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8) :: t_0
    t_0 = wj * exp(wj)
    code = wj - ((t_0 - x) / (exp(wj) + t_0))
end function
public static double code(double wj, double x) {
	double t_0 = wj * Math.exp(wj);
	return wj - ((t_0 - x) / (Math.exp(wj) + t_0));
}
def code(wj, x):
	t_0 = wj * math.exp(wj)
	return wj - ((t_0 - x) / (math.exp(wj) + t_0))
function code(wj, x)
	t_0 = Float64(wj * exp(wj))
	return Float64(wj - Float64(Float64(t_0 - x) / Float64(exp(wj) + t_0)))
end
function tmp = code(wj, x)
	t_0 = wj * exp(wj);
	tmp = wj - ((t_0 - x) / (exp(wj) + t_0));
end
code[wj_, x_] := Block[{t$95$0 = N[(wj * N[Exp[wj], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, N[(wj - N[(N[(t$95$0 - x), $MachinePrecision] / N[(N[Exp[wj], $MachinePrecision] + t$95$0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\begin{array}{l}
t_0 := wj \cdot e^{wj}\\
wj - \frac{t\_0 - x}{e^{wj} + t\_0}
\end{array}
\end{array}

Sampling outcomes in binary64 precision:

Local Percentage Accuracy vs ?

The average percentage accuracy by input value. Horizontal axis shows value of an input variable; the variable is choosen in the title. Vertical axis is accuracy; higher is better. Red represent the original program, while blue represents Herbie's suggestion. These can be toggled with buttons below the plot. The line is an average while dots represent individual samples.

Accuracy vs Speed?

Herbie found 9 alternatives:

AlternativeAccuracySpeedup
The accuracy (vertical axis) and speed (horizontal axis) of each alternatives. Up and to the right is better. The red square shows the initial program, and each blue circle shows an alternative.The line shows the best available speed-accuracy tradeoffs.

Initial Program: 78.6% accurate, 1.0× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_0 := wj \cdot e^{wj}\\ wj - \frac{t\_0 - x}{e^{wj} + t\_0} \end{array} \end{array} \]
(FPCore (wj x)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_0 (* wj (exp wj)))) (- wj (/ (- t_0 x) (+ (exp wj) t_0)))))
double code(double wj, double x) {
	double t_0 = wj * exp(wj);
	return wj - ((t_0 - x) / (exp(wj) + t_0));
}
real(8) function code(wj, x)
    real(8), intent (in) :: wj
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8) :: t_0
    t_0 = wj * exp(wj)
    code = wj - ((t_0 - x) / (exp(wj) + t_0))
end function
public static double code(double wj, double x) {
	double t_0 = wj * Math.exp(wj);
	return wj - ((t_0 - x) / (Math.exp(wj) + t_0));
}
def code(wj, x):
	t_0 = wj * math.exp(wj)
	return wj - ((t_0 - x) / (math.exp(wj) + t_0))
function code(wj, x)
	t_0 = Float64(wj * exp(wj))
	return Float64(wj - Float64(Float64(t_0 - x) / Float64(exp(wj) + t_0)))
end
function tmp = code(wj, x)
	t_0 = wj * exp(wj);
	tmp = wj - ((t_0 - x) / (exp(wj) + t_0));
end
code[wj_, x_] := Block[{t$95$0 = N[(wj * N[Exp[wj], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, N[(wj - N[(N[(t$95$0 - x), $MachinePrecision] / N[(N[Exp[wj], $MachinePrecision] + t$95$0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\begin{array}{l}
t_0 := wj \cdot e^{wj}\\
wj - \frac{t\_0 - x}{e^{wj} + t\_0}
\end{array}
\end{array}

Alternative 1: 96.1% accurate, 7.5× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(2.5, x, 1 - \mathsf{fma}\left(0.6666666666666666, x, \mathsf{fma}\left(2, x, 1\right)\right) \cdot wj\right), wj, -2 \cdot x\right), wj, x\right) \end{array} \]
(FPCore (wj x)
 :precision binary64
 (fma
  (fma
   (fma 2.5 x (- 1.0 (* (fma 0.6666666666666666 x (fma 2.0 x 1.0)) wj)))
   wj
   (* -2.0 x))
  wj
  x))
double code(double wj, double x) {
	return fma(fma(fma(2.5, x, (1.0 - (fma(0.6666666666666666, x, fma(2.0, x, 1.0)) * wj))), wj, (-2.0 * x)), wj, x);
}
function code(wj, x)
	return fma(fma(fma(2.5, x, Float64(1.0 - Float64(fma(0.6666666666666666, x, fma(2.0, x, 1.0)) * wj))), wj, Float64(-2.0 * x)), wj, x)
end
code[wj_, x_] := N[(N[(N[(2.5 * x + N[(1.0 - N[(N[(0.6666666666666666 * x + N[(2.0 * x + 1.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] * wj), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] * wj + N[(-2.0 * x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] * wj + x), $MachinePrecision]
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(2.5, x, 1 - \mathsf{fma}\left(0.6666666666666666, x, \mathsf{fma}\left(2, x, 1\right)\right) \cdot wj\right), wj, -2 \cdot x\right), wj, x\right)
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Initial program 79.1%

    \[wj - \frac{wj \cdot e^{wj} - x}{e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}} \]
  2. Add Preprocessing
  3. Taylor expanded in wj around 0

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + wj \cdot \left(wj \cdot \left(\left(1 + -1 \cdot \left(wj \cdot \left(1 + \left(-3 \cdot x + \left(-2 \cdot \left(-4 \cdot x + \frac{3}{2} \cdot x\right) + \frac{2}{3} \cdot x\right)\right)\right)\right)\right) - \left(-4 \cdot x + \frac{3}{2} \cdot x\right)\right) - 2 \cdot x\right)} \]
  4. Applied rewrites98.1%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(2.5, x, 1 - \mathsf{fma}\left(0.6666666666666666, x, \mathsf{fma}\left(2, x, 1\right)\right) \cdot wj\right), wj, -2 \cdot x\right), wj, x\right)} \]
  5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 2: 96.2% accurate, 8.1× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \mathsf{fma}\left(wj, \mathsf{fma}\left(wj, \frac{1 - wj}{x} + \mathsf{fma}\left(-2.6666666666666665, wj, 2.5\right), -2\right), 1\right) \cdot x \end{array} \]
(FPCore (wj x)
 :precision binary64
 (*
  (fma
   wj
   (fma wj (+ (/ (- 1.0 wj) x) (fma -2.6666666666666665 wj 2.5)) -2.0)
   1.0)
  x))
double code(double wj, double x) {
	return fma(wj, fma(wj, (((1.0 - wj) / x) + fma(-2.6666666666666665, wj, 2.5)), -2.0), 1.0) * x;
}
function code(wj, x)
	return Float64(fma(wj, fma(wj, Float64(Float64(Float64(1.0 - wj) / x) + fma(-2.6666666666666665, wj, 2.5)), -2.0), 1.0) * x)
end
code[wj_, x_] := N[(N[(wj * N[(wj * N[(N[(N[(1.0 - wj), $MachinePrecision] / x), $MachinePrecision] + N[(-2.6666666666666665 * wj + 2.5), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + -2.0), $MachinePrecision] + 1.0), $MachinePrecision] * x), $MachinePrecision]
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\mathsf{fma}\left(wj, \mathsf{fma}\left(wj, \frac{1 - wj}{x} + \mathsf{fma}\left(-2.6666666666666665, wj, 2.5\right), -2\right), 1\right) \cdot x
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Initial program 79.1%

    \[wj - \frac{wj \cdot e^{wj} - x}{e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}} \]
  2. Add Preprocessing
  3. Taylor expanded in wj around 0

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + wj \cdot \left(wj \cdot \left(\left(1 + -1 \cdot \left(wj \cdot \left(1 + \left(-3 \cdot x + \left(-2 \cdot \left(-4 \cdot x + \frac{3}{2} \cdot x\right) + \frac{2}{3} \cdot x\right)\right)\right)\right)\right) - \left(-4 \cdot x + \frac{3}{2} \cdot x\right)\right) - 2 \cdot x\right)} \]
  4. Applied rewrites98.1%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(2.5, x, 1 - \mathsf{fma}\left(0.6666666666666666, x, \mathsf{fma}\left(2, x, 1\right)\right) \cdot wj\right), wj, -2 \cdot x\right), wj, x\right)} \]
  5. Taylor expanded in x around inf

    \[\leadsto x \cdot \color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(wj \cdot \left(wj \cdot \left(\frac{5}{2} - \frac{8}{3} \cdot wj\right) - 2\right) + \frac{{wj}^{2} \cdot \left(1 - wj\right)}{x}\right)\right)} \]
  6. Applied rewrites98.0%

    \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(wj, \mathsf{fma}\left(wj, \frac{1 - wj}{x} + \mathsf{fma}\left(-2.6666666666666665, wj, 2.5\right), -2\right), 1\right) \cdot \color{blue}{x} \]
  7. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 3: 95.3% accurate, 22.1× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(-wj, wj, wj\right), wj, x\right) \end{array} \]
(FPCore (wj x) :precision binary64 (fma (fma (- wj) wj wj) wj x))
double code(double wj, double x) {
	return fma(fma(-wj, wj, wj), wj, x);
}
function code(wj, x)
	return fma(fma(Float64(-wj), wj, wj), wj, x)
end
code[wj_, x_] := N[(N[((-wj) * wj + wj), $MachinePrecision] * wj + x), $MachinePrecision]
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(-wj, wj, wj\right), wj, x\right)
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Initial program 79.1%

    \[wj - \frac{wj \cdot e^{wj} - x}{e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}} \]
  2. Add Preprocessing
  3. Taylor expanded in wj around 0

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + wj \cdot \left(wj \cdot \left(\left(1 + -1 \cdot \left(wj \cdot \left(1 + \left(-3 \cdot x + \left(-2 \cdot \left(-4 \cdot x + \frac{3}{2} \cdot x\right) + \frac{2}{3} \cdot x\right)\right)\right)\right)\right) - \left(-4 \cdot x + \frac{3}{2} \cdot x\right)\right) - 2 \cdot x\right)} \]
  4. Applied rewrites98.1%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(2.5, x, 1 - \mathsf{fma}\left(0.6666666666666666, x, \mathsf{fma}\left(2, x, 1\right)\right) \cdot wj\right), wj, -2 \cdot x\right), wj, x\right)} \]
  5. Taylor expanded in x around 0

    \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(wj \cdot \left(1 - wj\right), wj, x\right) \]
  6. Step-by-step derivation
    1. Applied rewrites97.4%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\left(1 - wj\right) \cdot wj, wj, x\right) \]
    2. Step-by-step derivation
      1. Applied rewrites97.4%

        \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(-wj, wj, wj\right), wj, x\right) \]
      2. Add Preprocessing

      Alternative 4: 95.3% accurate, 22.1× speedup?

      \[\begin{array}{l} \\ \mathsf{fma}\left(\left(1 - wj\right) \cdot wj, wj, x\right) \end{array} \]
      (FPCore (wj x) :precision binary64 (fma (* (- 1.0 wj) wj) wj x))
      double code(double wj, double x) {
      	return fma(((1.0 - wj) * wj), wj, x);
      }
      
      function code(wj, x)
      	return fma(Float64(Float64(1.0 - wj) * wj), wj, x)
      end
      
      code[wj_, x_] := N[(N[(N[(1.0 - wj), $MachinePrecision] * wj), $MachinePrecision] * wj + x), $MachinePrecision]
      
      \begin{array}{l}
      
      \\
      \mathsf{fma}\left(\left(1 - wj\right) \cdot wj, wj, x\right)
      \end{array}
      
      Derivation
      1. Initial program 79.1%

        \[wj - \frac{wj \cdot e^{wj} - x}{e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}} \]
      2. Add Preprocessing
      3. Taylor expanded in wj around 0

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + wj \cdot \left(wj \cdot \left(\left(1 + -1 \cdot \left(wj \cdot \left(1 + \left(-3 \cdot x + \left(-2 \cdot \left(-4 \cdot x + \frac{3}{2} \cdot x\right) + \frac{2}{3} \cdot x\right)\right)\right)\right)\right) - \left(-4 \cdot x + \frac{3}{2} \cdot x\right)\right) - 2 \cdot x\right)} \]
      4. Applied rewrites98.1%

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(2.5, x, 1 - \mathsf{fma}\left(0.6666666666666666, x, \mathsf{fma}\left(2, x, 1\right)\right) \cdot wj\right), wj, -2 \cdot x\right), wj, x\right)} \]
      5. Taylor expanded in x around 0

        \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(wj \cdot \left(1 - wj\right), wj, x\right) \]
      6. Step-by-step derivation
        1. Applied rewrites97.4%

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\left(1 - wj\right) \cdot wj, wj, x\right) \]
        2. Add Preprocessing

        Alternative 5: 84.8% accurate, 27.6× speedup?

        \[\begin{array}{l} \\ \mathsf{fma}\left(x \cdot wj, -2, x\right) \end{array} \]
        (FPCore (wj x) :precision binary64 (fma (* x wj) -2.0 x))
        double code(double wj, double x) {
        	return fma((x * wj), -2.0, x);
        }
        
        function code(wj, x)
        	return fma(Float64(x * wj), -2.0, x)
        end
        
        code[wj_, x_] := N[(N[(x * wj), $MachinePrecision] * -2.0 + x), $MachinePrecision]
        
        \begin{array}{l}
        
        \\
        \mathsf{fma}\left(x \cdot wj, -2, x\right)
        \end{array}
        
        Derivation
        1. Initial program 79.1%

          \[wj - \frac{wj \cdot e^{wj} - x}{e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}} \]
        2. Add Preprocessing
        3. Taylor expanded in wj around 0

          \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + -2 \cdot \left(wj \cdot x\right)} \]
        4. Step-by-step derivation
          1. +-commutativeN/A

            \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-2 \cdot \left(wj \cdot x\right) + x} \]
          2. *-commutativeN/A

            \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(wj \cdot x\right) \cdot -2} + x \]
          3. lower-fma.f64N/A

            \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(wj \cdot x, -2, x\right)} \]
          4. *-commutativeN/A

            \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{x \cdot wj}, -2, x\right) \]
          5. lower-*.f6487.3

            \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{x \cdot wj}, -2, x\right) \]
        5. Applied rewrites87.3%

          \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x \cdot wj, -2, x\right)} \]
        6. Add Preprocessing

        Alternative 6: 84.8% accurate, 27.6× speedup?

        \[\begin{array}{l} \\ \mathsf{fma}\left(-2, wj, 1\right) \cdot x \end{array} \]
        (FPCore (wj x) :precision binary64 (* (fma -2.0 wj 1.0) x))
        double code(double wj, double x) {
        	return fma(-2.0, wj, 1.0) * x;
        }
        
        function code(wj, x)
        	return Float64(fma(-2.0, wj, 1.0) * x)
        end
        
        code[wj_, x_] := N[(N[(-2.0 * wj + 1.0), $MachinePrecision] * x), $MachinePrecision]
        
        \begin{array}{l}
        
        \\
        \mathsf{fma}\left(-2, wj, 1\right) \cdot x
        \end{array}
        
        Derivation
        1. Initial program 79.1%

          \[wj - \frac{wj \cdot e^{wj} - x}{e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}} \]
        2. Add Preprocessing
        3. Taylor expanded in wj around 0

          \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + wj \cdot \left(wj \cdot \left(\left(1 + -1 \cdot \left(wj \cdot \left(1 + \left(-3 \cdot x + \left(-2 \cdot \left(-4 \cdot x + \frac{3}{2} \cdot x\right) + \frac{2}{3} \cdot x\right)\right)\right)\right)\right) - \left(-4 \cdot x + \frac{3}{2} \cdot x\right)\right) - 2 \cdot x\right)} \]
        4. Applied rewrites98.1%

          \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(2.5, x, 1 - \mathsf{fma}\left(0.6666666666666666, x, \mathsf{fma}\left(2, x, 1\right)\right) \cdot wj\right), wj, -2 \cdot x\right), wj, x\right)} \]
        5. Taylor expanded in wj around 0

          \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + -2 \cdot \left(wj \cdot x\right)} \]
        6. Step-by-step derivation
          1. associate-*r*N/A

            \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(-2 \cdot wj\right) \cdot x} \]
          2. distribute-rgt1-inN/A

            \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-2 \cdot wj + 1\right) \cdot x} \]
          3. +-commutativeN/A

            \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 + -2 \cdot wj\right)} \cdot x \]
          4. lower-*.f64N/A

            \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 + -2 \cdot wj\right) \cdot x} \]
          5. +-commutativeN/A

            \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-2 \cdot wj + 1\right)} \cdot x \]
          6. lower-fma.f6487.3

            \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(-2, wj, 1\right)} \cdot x \]
        7. Applied rewrites87.3%

          \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(-2, wj, 1\right) \cdot x} \]
        8. Add Preprocessing

        Alternative 7: 84.2% accurate, 55.2× speedup?

        \[\begin{array}{l} \\ 1 \cdot x \end{array} \]
        (FPCore (wj x) :precision binary64 (* 1.0 x))
        double code(double wj, double x) {
        	return 1.0 * x;
        }
        
        real(8) function code(wj, x)
            real(8), intent (in) :: wj
            real(8), intent (in) :: x
            code = 1.0d0 * x
        end function
        
        public static double code(double wj, double x) {
        	return 1.0 * x;
        }
        
        def code(wj, x):
        	return 1.0 * x
        
        function code(wj, x)
        	return Float64(1.0 * x)
        end
        
        function tmp = code(wj, x)
        	tmp = 1.0 * x;
        end
        
        code[wj_, x_] := N[(1.0 * x), $MachinePrecision]
        
        \begin{array}{l}
        
        \\
        1 \cdot x
        \end{array}
        
        Derivation
        1. Initial program 79.1%

          \[wj - \frac{wj \cdot e^{wj} - x}{e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}} \]
        2. Add Preprocessing
        3. Taylor expanded in wj around 0

          \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + wj \cdot \left(wj \cdot \left(\left(1 + -1 \cdot \left(wj \cdot \left(1 + \left(-3 \cdot x + \left(-2 \cdot \left(-4 \cdot x + \frac{3}{2} \cdot x\right) + \frac{2}{3} \cdot x\right)\right)\right)\right)\right) - \left(-4 \cdot x + \frac{3}{2} \cdot x\right)\right) - 2 \cdot x\right)} \]
        4. Applied rewrites98.1%

          \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(2.5, x, 1 - \mathsf{fma}\left(0.6666666666666666, x, \mathsf{fma}\left(2, x, 1\right)\right) \cdot wj\right), wj, -2 \cdot x\right), wj, x\right)} \]
        5. Taylor expanded in x around inf

          \[\leadsto x \cdot \color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(wj \cdot \left(wj \cdot \left(\frac{5}{2} - \frac{8}{3} \cdot wj\right) - 2\right) + \frac{{wj}^{2} \cdot \left(1 - wj\right)}{x}\right)\right)} \]
        6. Applied rewrites98.0%

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(wj, \mathsf{fma}\left(wj, \frac{1 - wj}{x} + \mathsf{fma}\left(-2.6666666666666665, wj, 2.5\right), -2\right), 1\right) \cdot \color{blue}{x} \]
        7. Taylor expanded in wj around 0

          \[\leadsto 1 \cdot x \]
        8. Step-by-step derivation
          1. Applied rewrites86.9%

            \[\leadsto 1 \cdot x \]
          2. Add Preprocessing

          Alternative 8: 4.3% accurate, 82.8× speedup?

          \[\begin{array}{l} \\ -1 + wj \end{array} \]
          (FPCore (wj x) :precision binary64 (+ -1.0 wj))
          double code(double wj, double x) {
          	return -1.0 + wj;
          }
          
          real(8) function code(wj, x)
              real(8), intent (in) :: wj
              real(8), intent (in) :: x
              code = (-1.0d0) + wj
          end function
          
          public static double code(double wj, double x) {
          	return -1.0 + wj;
          }
          
          def code(wj, x):
          	return -1.0 + wj
          
          function code(wj, x)
          	return Float64(-1.0 + wj)
          end
          
          function tmp = code(wj, x)
          	tmp = -1.0 + wj;
          end
          
          code[wj_, x_] := N[(-1.0 + wj), $MachinePrecision]
          
          \begin{array}{l}
          
          \\
          -1 + wj
          \end{array}
          
          Derivation
          1. Initial program 79.1%

            \[wj - \frac{wj \cdot e^{wj} - x}{e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}} \]
          2. Add Preprocessing
          3. Taylor expanded in wj around inf

            \[\leadsto \color{blue}{wj \cdot \left(1 - \frac{1}{wj}\right)} \]
          4. Step-by-step derivation
            1. sub-negN/A

              \[\leadsto wj \cdot \color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(\mathsf{neg}\left(\frac{1}{wj}\right)\right)\right)} \]
            2. distribute-rgt-inN/A

              \[\leadsto \color{blue}{1 \cdot wj + \left(\mathsf{neg}\left(\frac{1}{wj}\right)\right) \cdot wj} \]
            3. *-lft-identityN/A

              \[\leadsto \color{blue}{wj} + \left(\mathsf{neg}\left(\frac{1}{wj}\right)\right) \cdot wj \]
            4. distribute-lft-neg-outN/A

              \[\leadsto wj + \color{blue}{\left(\mathsf{neg}\left(\frac{1}{wj} \cdot wj\right)\right)} \]
            5. lft-mult-inverseN/A

              \[\leadsto wj + \left(\mathsf{neg}\left(\color{blue}{1}\right)\right) \]
            6. metadata-evalN/A

              \[\leadsto wj + \color{blue}{-1} \]
            7. +-commutativeN/A

              \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 + wj} \]
            8. lower-+.f643.6

              \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 + wj} \]
          5. Applied rewrites3.6%

            \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 + wj} \]
          6. Add Preprocessing

          Alternative 9: 3.4% accurate, 331.0× speedup?

          \[\begin{array}{l} \\ -1 \end{array} \]
          (FPCore (wj x) :precision binary64 -1.0)
          double code(double wj, double x) {
          	return -1.0;
          }
          
          real(8) function code(wj, x)
              real(8), intent (in) :: wj
              real(8), intent (in) :: x
              code = -1.0d0
          end function
          
          public static double code(double wj, double x) {
          	return -1.0;
          }
          
          def code(wj, x):
          	return -1.0
          
          function code(wj, x)
          	return -1.0
          end
          
          function tmp = code(wj, x)
          	tmp = -1.0;
          end
          
          code[wj_, x_] := -1.0
          
          \begin{array}{l}
          
          \\
          -1
          \end{array}
          
          Derivation
          1. Initial program 79.1%

            \[wj - \frac{wj \cdot e^{wj} - x}{e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}} \]
          2. Add Preprocessing
          3. Taylor expanded in wj around inf

            \[\leadsto \color{blue}{wj \cdot \left(1 - \frac{1}{wj}\right)} \]
          4. Step-by-step derivation
            1. sub-negN/A

              \[\leadsto wj \cdot \color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(\mathsf{neg}\left(\frac{1}{wj}\right)\right)\right)} \]
            2. distribute-rgt-inN/A

              \[\leadsto \color{blue}{1 \cdot wj + \left(\mathsf{neg}\left(\frac{1}{wj}\right)\right) \cdot wj} \]
            3. *-lft-identityN/A

              \[\leadsto \color{blue}{wj} + \left(\mathsf{neg}\left(\frac{1}{wj}\right)\right) \cdot wj \]
            4. distribute-lft-neg-outN/A

              \[\leadsto wj + \color{blue}{\left(\mathsf{neg}\left(\frac{1}{wj} \cdot wj\right)\right)} \]
            5. lft-mult-inverseN/A

              \[\leadsto wj + \left(\mathsf{neg}\left(\color{blue}{1}\right)\right) \]
            6. metadata-evalN/A

              \[\leadsto wj + \color{blue}{-1} \]
            7. +-commutativeN/A

              \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 + wj} \]
            8. lower-+.f643.6

              \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 + wj} \]
          5. Applied rewrites3.6%

            \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 + wj} \]
          6. Taylor expanded in wj around 0

            \[\leadsto -1 \]
          7. Step-by-step derivation
            1. Applied rewrites3.6%

              \[\leadsto -1 \]
            2. Add Preprocessing

            Developer Target 1: 79.6% accurate, 1.4× speedup?

            \[\begin{array}{l} \\ wj - \left(\frac{wj}{wj + 1} - \frac{x}{e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}}\right) \end{array} \]
            (FPCore (wj x)
             :precision binary64
             (- wj (- (/ wj (+ wj 1.0)) (/ x (+ (exp wj) (* wj (exp wj)))))))
            double code(double wj, double x) {
            	return wj - ((wj / (wj + 1.0)) - (x / (exp(wj) + (wj * exp(wj)))));
            }
            
            real(8) function code(wj, x)
                real(8), intent (in) :: wj
                real(8), intent (in) :: x
                code = wj - ((wj / (wj + 1.0d0)) - (x / (exp(wj) + (wj * exp(wj)))))
            end function
            
            public static double code(double wj, double x) {
            	return wj - ((wj / (wj + 1.0)) - (x / (Math.exp(wj) + (wj * Math.exp(wj)))));
            }
            
            def code(wj, x):
            	return wj - ((wj / (wj + 1.0)) - (x / (math.exp(wj) + (wj * math.exp(wj)))))
            
            function code(wj, x)
            	return Float64(wj - Float64(Float64(wj / Float64(wj + 1.0)) - Float64(x / Float64(exp(wj) + Float64(wj * exp(wj))))))
            end
            
            function tmp = code(wj, x)
            	tmp = wj - ((wj / (wj + 1.0)) - (x / (exp(wj) + (wj * exp(wj)))));
            end
            
            code[wj_, x_] := N[(wj - N[(N[(wj / N[(wj + 1.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - N[(x / N[(N[Exp[wj], $MachinePrecision] + N[(wj * N[Exp[wj], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]
            
            \begin{array}{l}
            
            \\
            wj - \left(\frac{wj}{wj + 1} - \frac{x}{e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}}\right)
            \end{array}
            

            Reproduce

            ?
            herbie shell --seed 2024326 
            (FPCore (wj x)
              :name "Jmat.Real.lambertw, newton loop step"
              :precision binary64
            
              :alt
              (! :herbie-platform default (let ((ew (exp wj))) (- wj (- (/ wj (+ wj 1)) (/ x (+ ew (* wj ew)))))))
            
              (- wj (/ (- (* wj (exp wj)) x) (+ (exp wj) (* wj (exp wj))))))