Linear.V3:$cdot from linear-1.19.1.3, B

Percentage Accurate: 97.7% → 98.9%

Time: 5.9s

Alternatives: 8

Speedup: 1.2×

• 33.6% of points produce a very large (infinite) output. You may want to add a precondition.

Specification

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b) :precision binary64 (+ (+ (* x y) (* z t)) (* a b)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	return ((x * y) + (z * t)) + (a * b);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    code = ((x * y) + (z * t)) + (a * b)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	return ((x * y) + (z * t)) + (a * b);
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b):
	return ((x * y) + (z * t)) + (a * b)

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(x * y) + Float64(z * t)) + Float64(a * b))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = ((x * y) + (z * t)) + (a * b);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := N[(N[(N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Initial Program: 97.7% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b) :precision binary64 (+ (+ (* x y) (* z t)) (* a b)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	return ((x * y) + (z * t)) + (a * b);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    code = ((x * y) + (z * t)) + (a * b)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	return ((x * y) + (z * t)) + (a * b);
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b):
	return ((x * y) + (z * t)) + (a * b)

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(x * y) + Float64(z * t)) + Float64(a * b))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = ((x * y) + (z * t)) + (a * b);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := N[(N[(N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Alternative 1: 98.9% accurate, 1.2× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \mathsf{fma}\left(y, x, \mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, z \cdot t\right)\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b) :precision binary64 (fma y x (fma b a (* z t))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	return fma(y, x, fma(b, a, (z * t)));
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	return fma(y, x, fma(b, a, Float64(z * t)))
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := N[(y * x + N[(b * a + N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 97.6%

   \[\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b \]
2. Add Preprocessing
3. Step-by-step derivation

   1. lift-+.f64 N/A

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b} \]

   2. lift-+.f64 N/A

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)} + a \cdot b \]

   3. associate-+l+ N/A

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot y + \left(z \cdot t + a \cdot b\right)} \]

   4. lift-*.f64 N/A

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot y} + \left(z \cdot t + a \cdot b\right) \]

   5. *-commutative N/A

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot x} + \left(z \cdot t + a \cdot b\right) \]

   6. lower-fma.f64 N/A

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, x, z \cdot t + a \cdot b\right)} \]

   7. +-commutative N/A

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, x, \color{blue}{a \cdot b + z \cdot t}\right) \]

   8. lift-*.f64 N/A

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, x, \color{blue}{a \cdot b} + z \cdot t\right) \]

   9. *-commutative N/A

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, x, \color{blue}{b \cdot a} + z \cdot t\right) \]

   10. lower-fma.f64 98.8

       \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, x, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

   11. lift-*.f64 N/A

       \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, x, \mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \color{blue}{z \cdot t}\right)\right) \]

   12. *-commutative N/A

       \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, x, \mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \color{blue}{t \cdot z}\right)\right) \]

   13. lower-*.f64 98.8

       \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, x, \mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \color{blue}{t \cdot z}\right)\right) \]

4. Applied rewrites 98.8%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, x, \mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, t \cdot z\right)\right)} \]

5. Final simplification 98.8%

   \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, x, \mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, z \cdot t\right)\right) \]
6. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 2: 55.2% accurate, 0.6× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;a \cdot b \leq -5 \cdot 10^{+25}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot b\\ \mathbf{elif}\;a \cdot b \leq -5 \cdot 10^{-315}:\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot t\\ \mathbf{elif}\;a \cdot b \leq 10^{-7}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot y\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot b\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= (* a b) -5e+25)
   (* a b)
   (if (<= (* a b) -5e-315) (* z t) (if (<= (* a b) 1e-7) (* x y) (* a b)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if ((a * b) <= -5e+25) {
		tmp = a * b;
	} else if ((a * b) <= -5e-315) {
		tmp = z * t;
	} else if ((a * b) <= 1e-7) {
		tmp = x * y;
	} else {
		tmp = a * b;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((a * b) <= (-5d+25)) then
        tmp = a * b
    else if ((a * b) <= (-5d-315)) then
        tmp = z * t
    else if ((a * b) <= 1d-7) then
        tmp = x * y
    else
        tmp = a * b
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if ((a * b) <= -5e+25) {
		tmp = a * b;
	} else if ((a * b) <= -5e-315) {
		tmp = z * t;
	} else if ((a * b) <= 1e-7) {
		tmp = x * y;
	} else {
		tmp = a * b;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b):
	tmp = 0
	if (a * b) <= -5e+25:
		tmp = a * b
	elif (a * b) <= -5e-315:
		tmp = z * t
	elif (a * b) <= 1e-7:
		tmp = x * y
	else:
		tmp = a * b
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (Float64(a * b) <= -5e+25)
		tmp = Float64(a * b);
	elseif (Float64(a * b) <= -5e-315)
		tmp = Float64(z * t);
	elseif (Float64(a * b) <= 1e-7)
		tmp = Float64(x * y);
	else
		tmp = Float64(a * b);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((a * b) <= -5e+25)
		tmp = a * b;
	elseif ((a * b) <= -5e-315)
		tmp = z * t;
	elseif ((a * b) <= 1e-7)
		tmp = x * y;
	else
		tmp = a * b;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := If[LessEqual[N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision], -5e+25], N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision], -5e-315], N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision], 1e-7], N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision], N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision]]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if (*.f64 a b) < -5.00000000000000024e25 or 9.9999999999999995e-8 < (*.f64 a b)

   1. Initial program 95.4%

      \[\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in z around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot b + x \cdot y} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{b \cdot a} + x \cdot y \]

      2. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, x \cdot y\right)} \]

      3. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \color{blue}{y \cdot x}\right) \]

      4. lower-*.f64 88.0

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \color{blue}{y \cdot x}\right) \]

   5. Applied rewrites 88.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, y \cdot x\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in x around 0

      \[\leadsto a \cdot \color{blue}{b} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

   8. Applied rewrites 69.3%

      \[\leadsto b \cdot \color{blue}{a} \]

   if -5.00000000000000024e25 < (*.f64 a b) < -5.0000000023e-315

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot b + t \cdot z} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{b \cdot a} + t \cdot z \]

      2. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, t \cdot z\right)} \]

      3. lower-*.f64 62.9

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \color{blue}{t \cdot z}\right) \]

   5. Applied rewrites 62.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, t \cdot z\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in a around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{t \cdot z + x \cdot y} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

      1. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(t, z, x \cdot y\right)} \]

      2. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(t, z, \color{blue}{y \cdot x}\right) \]

      3. lower-*.f64 89.2

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(t, z, \color{blue}{y \cdot x}\right) \]

   8. Applied rewrites 89.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(t, z, y \cdot x\right)} \]

   9. Taylor expanded in x around 0

      \[\leadsto t \cdot \color{blue}{z} \]
   10. Step-by-step derivation

   11. Applied rewrites 52.3%

       \[\leadsto t \cdot \color{blue}{z} \]

   if -5.0000000023e-315 < (*.f64 a b) < 9.9999999999999995e-8

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot b + t \cdot z} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{b \cdot a} + t \cdot z \]

      2. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, t \cdot z\right)} \]

      3. lower-*.f64 50.9

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \color{blue}{t \cdot z}\right) \]

   5. Applied rewrites 50.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, t \cdot z\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in a around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{t \cdot z + x \cdot y} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

      1. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(t, z, x \cdot y\right)} \]

      2. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(t, z, \color{blue}{y \cdot x}\right) \]

      3. lower-*.f64 94.2

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(t, z, \color{blue}{y \cdot x}\right) \]

   8. Applied rewrites 94.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(t, z, y \cdot x\right)} \]

   9. Taylor expanded in x around 0

      \[\leadsto t \cdot \color{blue}{z} \]
   10. Step-by-step derivation

   11. Applied rewrites 45.2%

       \[\leadsto t \cdot \color{blue}{z} \]

   12. Taylor expanded in x around inf

       \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot y} \]
   13. Step-by-step derivation

       1. *-commutative N/A

          \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot x} \]

       2. lower-*.f64 55.1

          \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot x} \]

   14. Applied rewrites 55.1%

       \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot x} \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 61.8%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;a \cdot b \leq -5 \cdot 10^{+25}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot b\\ \mathbf{elif}\;a \cdot b \leq -5 \cdot 10^{-315}:\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot t\\ \mathbf{elif}\;a \cdot b \leq 10^{-7}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot y\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot b\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 3: 85.8% accurate, 0.6× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_1 := \mathsf{fma}\left(y, x, a \cdot b\right)\\ \mathbf{if}\;a \cdot b \leq -5 \cdot 10^{+25}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_1\\ \mathbf{elif}\;a \cdot b \leq 4 \cdot 10^{-30}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(t, z, x \cdot y\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_1\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_1 (fma y x (* a b))))
   (if (<= (* a b) -5e+25) t_1 (if (<= (* a b) 4e-30) (fma t z (* x y)) t_1))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double t_1 = fma(y, x, (a * b));
	double tmp;
	if ((a * b) <= -5e+25) {
		tmp = t_1;
	} else if ((a * b) <= 4e-30) {
		tmp = fma(t, z, (x * y));
	} else {
		tmp = t_1;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	t_1 = fma(y, x, Float64(a * b))
	tmp = 0.0
	if (Float64(a * b) <= -5e+25)
		tmp = t_1;
	elseif (Float64(a * b) <= 4e-30)
		tmp = fma(t, z, Float64(x * y));
	else
		tmp = t_1;
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := Block[{t$95$1 = N[(y * x + N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision], -5e+25], t$95$1, If[LessEqual[N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision], 4e-30], N[(t * z + N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], t$95$1]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (*.f64 a b) < -5.00000000000000024e25 or 4e-30 < (*.f64 a b)

   1. Initial program 95.4%

      \[\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in z around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot b + x \cdot y} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{b \cdot a} + x \cdot y \]

      2. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, x \cdot y\right)} \]

      3. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \color{blue}{y \cdot x}\right) \]

      4. lower-*.f64 88.1

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \color{blue}{y \cdot x}\right) \]

   5. Applied rewrites 88.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, y \cdot x\right)} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

   7. Applied rewrites 89.6%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \color{blue}{x}, b \cdot a\right) \]

   if -5.00000000000000024e25 < (*.f64 a b) < 4e-30

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot b + t \cdot z} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{b \cdot a} + t \cdot z \]

      2. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, t \cdot z\right)} \]

      3. lower-*.f64 55.7

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \color{blue}{t \cdot z}\right) \]

   5. Applied rewrites 55.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, t \cdot z\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in a around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{t \cdot z + x \cdot y} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

      1. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(t, z, x \cdot y\right)} \]

      2. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(t, z, \color{blue}{y \cdot x}\right) \]

      3. lower-*.f64 92.3

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(t, z, \color{blue}{y \cdot x}\right) \]

   8. Applied rewrites 92.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(t, z, y \cdot x\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 90.9%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;a \cdot b \leq -5 \cdot 10^{+25}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(y, x, a \cdot b\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;a \cdot b \leq 4 \cdot 10^{-30}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(t, z, x \cdot y\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(y, x, a \cdot b\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 4: 85.8% accurate, 0.6× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_1 := \mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, x \cdot y\right)\\ \mathbf{if}\;a \cdot b \leq -5 \cdot 10^{+25}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_1\\ \mathbf{elif}\;a \cdot b \leq 4 \cdot 10^{-30}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(t, z, x \cdot y\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_1\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_1 (fma b a (* x y))))
   (if (<= (* a b) -5e+25) t_1 (if (<= (* a b) 4e-30) (fma t z (* x y)) t_1))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double t_1 = fma(b, a, (x * y));
	double tmp;
	if ((a * b) <= -5e+25) {
		tmp = t_1;
	} else if ((a * b) <= 4e-30) {
		tmp = fma(t, z, (x * y));
	} else {
		tmp = t_1;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	t_1 = fma(b, a, Float64(x * y))
	tmp = 0.0
	if (Float64(a * b) <= -5e+25)
		tmp = t_1;
	elseif (Float64(a * b) <= 4e-30)
		tmp = fma(t, z, Float64(x * y));
	else
		tmp = t_1;
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := Block[{t$95$1 = N[(b * a + N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision], -5e+25], t$95$1, If[LessEqual[N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision], 4e-30], N[(t * z + N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], t$95$1]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (*.f64 a b) < -5.00000000000000024e25 or 4e-30 < (*.f64 a b)

   1. Initial program 95.4%

      \[\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in z around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot b + x \cdot y} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{b \cdot a} + x \cdot y \]

      2. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, x \cdot y\right)} \]

      3. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \color{blue}{y \cdot x}\right) \]

      4. lower-*.f64 88.1

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \color{blue}{y \cdot x}\right) \]

   5. Applied rewrites 88.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, y \cdot x\right)} \]

   if -5.00000000000000024e25 < (*.f64 a b) < 4e-30

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot b + t \cdot z} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{b \cdot a} + t \cdot z \]

      2. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, t \cdot z\right)} \]

      3. lower-*.f64 55.7

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \color{blue}{t \cdot z}\right) \]

   5. Applied rewrites 55.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, t \cdot z\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in a around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{t \cdot z + x \cdot y} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

      1. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(t, z, x \cdot y\right)} \]

      2. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(t, z, \color{blue}{y \cdot x}\right) \]

      3. lower-*.f64 92.3

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(t, z, \color{blue}{y \cdot x}\right) \]

   8. Applied rewrites 92.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(t, z, y \cdot x\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 90.1%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;a \cdot b \leq -5 \cdot 10^{+25}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, x \cdot y\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;a \cdot b \leq 4 \cdot 10^{-30}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(t, z, x \cdot y\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, x \cdot y\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 5: 84.4% accurate, 0.6× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_1 := \mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, x \cdot y\right)\\ \mathbf{if}\;x \cdot y \leq -1 \cdot 10^{+161}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_1\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \cdot y \leq 2 \cdot 10^{+68}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, z \cdot t\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_1\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_1 (fma b a (* x y))))
   (if (<= (* x y) -1e+161)
     t_1
     (if (<= (* x y) 2e+68) (fma b a (* z t)) t_1))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double t_1 = fma(b, a, (x * y));
	double tmp;
	if ((x * y) <= -1e+161) {
		tmp = t_1;
	} else if ((x * y) <= 2e+68) {
		tmp = fma(b, a, (z * t));
	} else {
		tmp = t_1;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	t_1 = fma(b, a, Float64(x * y))
	tmp = 0.0
	if (Float64(x * y) <= -1e+161)
		tmp = t_1;
	elseif (Float64(x * y) <= 2e+68)
		tmp = fma(b, a, Float64(z * t));
	else
		tmp = t_1;
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := Block[{t$95$1 = N[(b * a + N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision], -1e+161], t$95$1, If[LessEqual[N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision], 2e+68], N[(b * a + N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], t$95$1]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (*.f64 x y) < -1e161 or 1.99999999999999991e68 < (*.f64 x y)

   1. Initial program 94.2%

      \[\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in z around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot b + x \cdot y} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{b \cdot a} + x \cdot y \]

      2. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, x \cdot y\right)} \]

      3. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \color{blue}{y \cdot x}\right) \]

      4. lower-*.f64 93.3

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \color{blue}{y \cdot x}\right) \]

   5. Applied rewrites 93.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, y \cdot x\right)} \]

   if -1e161 < (*.f64 x y) < 1.99999999999999991e68

   1. Initial program 99.4%

      \[\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot b + t \cdot z} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{b \cdot a} + t \cdot z \]

      2. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, t \cdot z\right)} \]

      3. lower-*.f64 88.2

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \color{blue}{t \cdot z}\right) \]

   5. Applied rewrites 88.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, t \cdot z\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 89.9%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \cdot y \leq -1 \cdot 10^{+161}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, x \cdot y\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \cdot y \leq 2 \cdot 10^{+68}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, z \cdot t\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, x \cdot y\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 6: 80.5% accurate, 0.6× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \cdot y \leq -1 \cdot 10^{+161}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot y\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \cdot y \leq 10^{+109}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, z \cdot t\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot y\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= (* x y) -1e+161)
   (* x y)
   (if (<= (* x y) 1e+109) (fma b a (* z t)) (* x y))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x * y) <= -1e+161) {
		tmp = x * y;
	} else if ((x * y) <= 1e+109) {
		tmp = fma(b, a, (z * t));
	} else {
		tmp = x * y;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (Float64(x * y) <= -1e+161)
		tmp = Float64(x * y);
	elseif (Float64(x * y) <= 1e+109)
		tmp = fma(b, a, Float64(z * t));
	else
		tmp = Float64(x * y);
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := If[LessEqual[N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision], -1e+161], N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision], 1e+109], N[(b * a + N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (*.f64 x y) < -1e161 or 9.99999999999999982e108 < (*.f64 x y)

   1. Initial program 93.7%

      \[\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot b + t \cdot z} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{b \cdot a} + t \cdot z \]

      2. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, t \cdot z\right)} \]

      3. lower-*.f64 22.7

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \color{blue}{t \cdot z}\right) \]

   5. Applied rewrites 22.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, t \cdot z\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in a around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{t \cdot z + x \cdot y} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

      1. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(t, z, x \cdot y\right)} \]

      2. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(t, z, \color{blue}{y \cdot x}\right) \]

      3. lower-*.f64 83.2

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(t, z, \color{blue}{y \cdot x}\right) \]

   8. Applied rewrites 83.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(t, z, y \cdot x\right)} \]

   9. Taylor expanded in x around 0

      \[\leadsto t \cdot \color{blue}{z} \]
   10. Step-by-step derivation

   11. Applied rewrites 9.4%

       \[\leadsto t \cdot \color{blue}{z} \]

   12. Taylor expanded in x around inf

       \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot y} \]
   13. Step-by-step derivation

       1. *-commutative N/A

          \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot x} \]

       2. lower-*.f64 79.6

          \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot x} \]

   14. Applied rewrites 79.6%

       \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot x} \]

   if -1e161 < (*.f64 x y) < 9.99999999999999982e108

   1. Initial program 99.4%

      \[\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot b + t \cdot z} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{b \cdot a} + t \cdot z \]

      2. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, t \cdot z\right)} \]

      3. lower-*.f64 86.6

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \color{blue}{t \cdot z}\right) \]

   5. Applied rewrites 86.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, t \cdot z\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 84.4%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \cdot y \leq -1 \cdot 10^{+161}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot y\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \cdot y \leq 10^{+109}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, z \cdot t\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot y\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 7: 54.2% accurate, 0.8× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;a \cdot b \leq -5 \cdot 10^{+25}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot b\\ \mathbf{elif}\;a \cdot b \leq 10^{-7}:\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot t\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot b\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= (* a b) -5e+25) (* a b) (if (<= (* a b) 1e-7) (* z t) (* a b))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if ((a * b) <= -5e+25) {
		tmp = a * b;
	} else if ((a * b) <= 1e-7) {
		tmp = z * t;
	} else {
		tmp = a * b;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((a * b) <= (-5d+25)) then
        tmp = a * b
    else if ((a * b) <= 1d-7) then
        tmp = z * t
    else
        tmp = a * b
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if ((a * b) <= -5e+25) {
		tmp = a * b;
	} else if ((a * b) <= 1e-7) {
		tmp = z * t;
	} else {
		tmp = a * b;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b):
	tmp = 0
	if (a * b) <= -5e+25:
		tmp = a * b
	elif (a * b) <= 1e-7:
		tmp = z * t
	else:
		tmp = a * b
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (Float64(a * b) <= -5e+25)
		tmp = Float64(a * b);
	elseif (Float64(a * b) <= 1e-7)
		tmp = Float64(z * t);
	else
		tmp = Float64(a * b);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((a * b) <= -5e+25)
		tmp = a * b;
	elseif ((a * b) <= 1e-7)
		tmp = z * t;
	else
		tmp = a * b;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := If[LessEqual[N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision], -5e+25], N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision], 1e-7], N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision], N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (*.f64 a b) < -5.00000000000000024e25 or 9.9999999999999995e-8 < (*.f64 a b)

   1. Initial program 95.4%

      \[\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in z around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot b + x \cdot y} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{b \cdot a} + x \cdot y \]

      2. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, x \cdot y\right)} \]

      3. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \color{blue}{y \cdot x}\right) \]

      4. lower-*.f64 88.0

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \color{blue}{y \cdot x}\right) \]

   5. Applied rewrites 88.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, y \cdot x\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in x around 0

      \[\leadsto a \cdot \color{blue}{b} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

   8. Applied rewrites 69.3%

      \[\leadsto b \cdot \color{blue}{a} \]

   if -5.00000000000000024e25 < (*.f64 a b) < 9.9999999999999995e-8

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot b + t \cdot z} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{b \cdot a} + t \cdot z \]

      2. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, t \cdot z\right)} \]

      3. lower-*.f64 55.3

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \color{blue}{t \cdot z}\right) \]

   5. Applied rewrites 55.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, t \cdot z\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in a around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{t \cdot z + x \cdot y} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

      1. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(t, z, x \cdot y\right)} \]

      2. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(t, z, \color{blue}{y \cdot x}\right) \]

      3. lower-*.f64 92.4

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(t, z, \color{blue}{y \cdot x}\right) \]

   8. Applied rewrites 92.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(t, z, y \cdot x\right)} \]

   9. Taylor expanded in x around 0

      \[\leadsto t \cdot \color{blue}{z} \]
   10. Step-by-step derivation

   11. Applied rewrites 47.8%

       \[\leadsto t \cdot \color{blue}{z} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 58.7%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;a \cdot b \leq -5 \cdot 10^{+25}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot b\\ \mathbf{elif}\;a \cdot b \leq 10^{-7}:\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot t\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot b\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 8: 35.4% accurate, 3.7× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ a \cdot b \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b) :precision binary64 (* a b))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	return a * b;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    code = a * b
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	return a * b;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b):
	return a * b

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	return Float64(a * b)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = a * b;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 97.6%

   \[\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b \]
2. Add Preprocessing

3. Taylor expanded in z around 0

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot b + x \cdot y} \]
4. Step-by-step derivation

   1. *-commutative N/A

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{b \cdot a} + x \cdot y \]

   2. lower-fma.f64 N/A

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, x \cdot y\right)} \]

   3. *-commutative N/A

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \color{blue}{y \cdot x}\right) \]

   4. lower-*.f64 72.5

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \color{blue}{y \cdot x}\right) \]

5. Applied rewrites 72.5%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, y \cdot x\right)} \]

6. Taylor expanded in x around 0

   \[\leadsto a \cdot \color{blue}{b} \]
7. Step-by-step derivation

8. Applied rewrites 40.6%

   \[\leadsto b \cdot \color{blue}{a} \]

9. Final simplification 40.6%

   \[\leadsto a \cdot b \]
10. Add Preprocessing

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2024325 
(FPCore (x y z t a b)
  :name "Linear.V3:$cdot from linear-1.19.1.3, B"
  :precision binary64
  (+ (+ (* x y) (* z t)) (* a b)))