Linear.V3:$cdot from linear-1.19.1.3, B

Percentage Accurate: 97.8% → 99.0%

Time: 5.3s

Alternatives: 7

Speedup: 1.2×

• 32.7% of points produce a very large (infinite) output. You may want to add a precondition.

Specification

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b) :precision binary64 (+ (+ (* x y) (* z t)) (* a b)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	return ((x * y) + (z * t)) + (a * b);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    code = ((x * y) + (z * t)) + (a * b)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	return ((x * y) + (z * t)) + (a * b);
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b):
	return ((x * y) + (z * t)) + (a * b)

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(x * y) + Float64(z * t)) + Float64(a * b))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = ((x * y) + (z * t)) + (a * b);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := N[(N[(N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Initial Program: 97.8% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b) :precision binary64 (+ (+ (* x y) (* z t)) (* a b)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	return ((x * y) + (z * t)) + (a * b);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    code = ((x * y) + (z * t)) + (a * b)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	return ((x * y) + (z * t)) + (a * b);
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b):
	return ((x * y) + (z * t)) + (a * b)

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(x * y) + Float64(z * t)) + Float64(a * b))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = ((x * y) + (z * t)) + (a * b);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := N[(N[(N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Alternative 1: 99.0% accurate, 1.2× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \mathsf{fma}\left(z, t, \mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, y \cdot x\right)\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b) :precision binary64 (fma z t (fma b a (* y x))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	return fma(z, t, fma(b, a, (y * x)));
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	return fma(z, t, fma(b, a, Float64(y * x)))
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := N[(z * t + N[(b * a + N[(y * x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 96.9%

   \[\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b \]
2. Add Preprocessing
3. Step-by-step derivation

   1. lift-+.f64 N/A

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b} \]

   2. lift-+.f64 N/A

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)} + a \cdot b \]

   3. +-commutative N/A

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(z \cdot t + x \cdot y\right)} + a \cdot b \]

   4. associate-+l+ N/A

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot t + \left(x \cdot y + a \cdot b\right)} \]

   5. lift-*.f64 N/A

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot t} + \left(x \cdot y + a \cdot b\right) \]

   6. lower-fma.f64 N/A

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, t, x \cdot y + a \cdot b\right)} \]

   7. +-commutative N/A

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z, t, \color{blue}{a \cdot b + x \cdot y}\right) \]

   8. lift-*.f64 N/A

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z, t, \color{blue}{a \cdot b} + x \cdot y\right) \]

   9. *-commutative N/A

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z, t, \color{blue}{b \cdot a} + x \cdot y\right) \]

   10. lower-fma.f64 99.2

       \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z, t, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, x \cdot y\right)}\right) \]

   11. lift-*.f64 N/A

       \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z, t, \mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \color{blue}{x \cdot y}\right)\right) \]

   12. *-commutative N/A

       \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z, t, \mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \color{blue}{y \cdot x}\right)\right) \]

   13. lower-*.f64 99.2

       \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z, t, \mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \color{blue}{y \cdot x}\right)\right) \]

4. Applied rewrites 99.2%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, t, \mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, y \cdot x\right)\right)} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 2: 54.0% accurate, 0.6× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;a \cdot b \leq -5 \cdot 10^{+81}:\\ \;\;\;\;b \cdot a\\ \mathbf{elif}\;a \cdot b \leq 2 \cdot 10^{-271}:\\ \;\;\;\;t \cdot z\\ \mathbf{elif}\;a \cdot b \leq 5 \cdot 10^{-21}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot x\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;b \cdot a\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= (* a b) -5e+81)
   (* b a)
   (if (<= (* a b) 2e-271) (* t z) (if (<= (* a b) 5e-21) (* y x) (* b a)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if ((a * b) <= -5e+81) {
		tmp = b * a;
	} else if ((a * b) <= 2e-271) {
		tmp = t * z;
	} else if ((a * b) <= 5e-21) {
		tmp = y * x;
	} else {
		tmp = b * a;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((a * b) <= (-5d+81)) then
        tmp = b * a
    else if ((a * b) <= 2d-271) then
        tmp = t * z
    else if ((a * b) <= 5d-21) then
        tmp = y * x
    else
        tmp = b * a
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if ((a * b) <= -5e+81) {
		tmp = b * a;
	} else if ((a * b) <= 2e-271) {
		tmp = t * z;
	} else if ((a * b) <= 5e-21) {
		tmp = y * x;
	} else {
		tmp = b * a;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b):
	tmp = 0
	if (a * b) <= -5e+81:
		tmp = b * a
	elif (a * b) <= 2e-271:
		tmp = t * z
	elif (a * b) <= 5e-21:
		tmp = y * x
	else:
		tmp = b * a
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (Float64(a * b) <= -5e+81)
		tmp = Float64(b * a);
	elseif (Float64(a * b) <= 2e-271)
		tmp = Float64(t * z);
	elseif (Float64(a * b) <= 5e-21)
		tmp = Float64(y * x);
	else
		tmp = Float64(b * a);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((a * b) <= -5e+81)
		tmp = b * a;
	elseif ((a * b) <= 2e-271)
		tmp = t * z;
	elseif ((a * b) <= 5e-21)
		tmp = y * x;
	else
		tmp = b * a;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := If[LessEqual[N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision], -5e+81], N[(b * a), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision], 2e-271], N[(t * z), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision], 5e-21], N[(y * x), $MachinePrecision], N[(b * a), $MachinePrecision]]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if (*.f64 a b) < -4.9999999999999998e81 or 4.99999999999999973e-21 < (*.f64 a b)

   1. Initial program 94.3%

      \[\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in z around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot b + x \cdot y} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{b \cdot a} + x \cdot y \]

      2. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, x \cdot y\right)} \]

      3. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \color{blue}{y \cdot x}\right) \]

      4. lower-*.f64 85.7

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \color{blue}{y \cdot x}\right) \]

   5. Applied rewrites 85.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, y \cdot x\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in x around 0

      \[\leadsto a \cdot \color{blue}{b} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

   8. Applied rewrites 73.5%

      \[\leadsto b \cdot \color{blue}{a} \]

   if -4.9999999999999998e81 < (*.f64 a b) < 1.99999999999999993e-271

   1. Initial program 98.9%

      \[\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot b + t \cdot z} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{b \cdot a} + t \cdot z \]

      2. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, t \cdot z\right)} \]

      3. lower-*.f64 58.0

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \color{blue}{t \cdot z}\right) \]

   5. Applied rewrites 58.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, t \cdot z\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in a around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{t \cdot z + x \cdot y} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

      1. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(t, z, x \cdot y\right)} \]

      2. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(t, z, \color{blue}{y \cdot x}\right) \]

      3. lower-*.f64 93.8

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(t, z, \color{blue}{y \cdot x}\right) \]

   8. Applied rewrites 93.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(t, z, y \cdot x\right)} \]

   9. Taylor expanded in x around 0

      \[\leadsto t \cdot \color{blue}{z} \]
   10. Step-by-step derivation

   11. Applied rewrites 51.8%

       \[\leadsto t \cdot \color{blue}{z} \]

   if 1.99999999999999993e-271 < (*.f64 a b) < 4.99999999999999973e-21

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot b + t \cdot z} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{b \cdot a} + t \cdot z \]

      2. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, t \cdot z\right)} \]

      3. lower-*.f64 45.9

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \color{blue}{t \cdot z}\right) \]

   5. Applied rewrites 45.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, t \cdot z\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in a around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{t \cdot z + x \cdot y} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

      1. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(t, z, x \cdot y\right)} \]

      2. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(t, z, \color{blue}{y \cdot x}\right) \]

      3. lower-*.f64 97.6

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(t, z, \color{blue}{y \cdot x}\right) \]

   8. Applied rewrites 97.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(t, z, y \cdot x\right)} \]

   9. Taylor expanded in x around 0

      \[\leadsto t \cdot \color{blue}{z} \]
   10. Step-by-step derivation

   11. Applied rewrites 43.4%

       \[\leadsto t \cdot \color{blue}{z} \]

   12. Taylor expanded in x around inf

       \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot y} \]
   13. Step-by-step derivation

       1. *-commutative N/A

          \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot x} \]

       2. lower-*.f64 54.1

          \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot x} \]

   14. Applied rewrites 54.1%

       \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot x} \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.
4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 3: 84.3% accurate, 0.6× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \cdot t \leq -5 \cdot 10^{+111} \lor \neg \left(z \cdot t \leq 10^{+19}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, t \cdot z\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, y \cdot x\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= (* z t) -5e+111) (not (<= (* z t) 1e+19)))
   (fma b a (* t z))
   (fma b a (* y x))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if (((z * t) <= -5e+111) || !((z * t) <= 1e+19)) {
		tmp = fma(b, a, (t * z));
	} else {
		tmp = fma(b, a, (y * x));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((Float64(z * t) <= -5e+111) || !(Float64(z * t) <= 1e+19))
		tmp = fma(b, a, Float64(t * z));
	else
		tmp = fma(b, a, Float64(y * x));
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := If[Or[LessEqual[N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision], -5e+111], N[Not[LessEqual[N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision], 1e+19]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(b * a + N[(t * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(b * a + N[(y * x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (*.f64 z t) < -4.9999999999999997e111 or 1e19 < (*.f64 z t)

   1. Initial program 93.6%

      \[\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot b + t \cdot z} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{b \cdot a} + t \cdot z \]

      2. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, t \cdot z\right)} \]

      3. lower-*.f64 81.6

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \color{blue}{t \cdot z}\right) \]

   5. Applied rewrites 81.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, t \cdot z\right)} \]

   if -4.9999999999999997e111 < (*.f64 z t) < 1e19

   1. Initial program 99.3%

      \[\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in z around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot b + x \cdot y} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{b \cdot a} + x \cdot y \]

      2. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, x \cdot y\right)} \]

      3. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \color{blue}{y \cdot x}\right) \]

      4. lower-*.f64 90.1

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \color{blue}{y \cdot x}\right) \]

   5. Applied rewrites 90.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, y \cdot x\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 86.5%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \cdot t \leq -5 \cdot 10^{+111} \lor \neg \left(z \cdot t \leq 10^{+19}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, t \cdot z\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, y \cdot x\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 4: 81.0% accurate, 0.6× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \cdot y \leq -2 \cdot 10^{+146} \lor \neg \left(x \cdot y \leq 10^{+240}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot x\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, t \cdot z\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= (* x y) -2e+146) (not (<= (* x y) 1e+240)))
   (* y x)
   (fma b a (* t z))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if (((x * y) <= -2e+146) || !((x * y) <= 1e+240)) {
		tmp = y * x;
	} else {
		tmp = fma(b, a, (t * z));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((Float64(x * y) <= -2e+146) || !(Float64(x * y) <= 1e+240))
		tmp = Float64(y * x);
	else
		tmp = fma(b, a, Float64(t * z));
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := If[Or[LessEqual[N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision], -2e+146], N[Not[LessEqual[N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision], 1e+240]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(y * x), $MachinePrecision], N[(b * a + N[(t * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (*.f64 x y) < -1.99999999999999987e146 or 1.00000000000000001e240 < (*.f64 x y)

   1. Initial program 95.5%

      \[\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot b + t \cdot z} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{b \cdot a} + t \cdot z \]

      2. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, t \cdot z\right)} \]

      3. lower-*.f64 25.6

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \color{blue}{t \cdot z}\right) \]

   5. Applied rewrites 25.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, t \cdot z\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in a around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{t \cdot z + x \cdot y} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

      1. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(t, z, x \cdot y\right)} \]

      2. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(t, z, \color{blue}{y \cdot x}\right) \]

      3. lower-*.f64 92.7

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(t, z, \color{blue}{y \cdot x}\right) \]

   8. Applied rewrites 92.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(t, z, y \cdot x\right)} \]

   9. Taylor expanded in x around 0

      \[\leadsto t \cdot \color{blue}{z} \]
   10. Step-by-step derivation

   11. Applied rewrites 13.9%

       \[\leadsto t \cdot \color{blue}{z} \]

   12. Taylor expanded in x around inf

       \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot y} \]
   13. Step-by-step derivation

       1. *-commutative N/A

          \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot x} \]

       2. lower-*.f64 84.1

          \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot x} \]

   14. Applied rewrites 84.1%

       \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot x} \]

   if -1.99999999999999987e146 < (*.f64 x y) < 1.00000000000000001e240

   1. Initial program 97.3%

      \[\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot b + t \cdot z} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{b \cdot a} + t \cdot z \]

      2. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, t \cdot z\right)} \]

      3. lower-*.f64 83.7

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \color{blue}{t \cdot z}\right) \]

   5. Applied rewrites 83.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, t \cdot z\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 83.8%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \cdot y \leq -2 \cdot 10^{+146} \lor \neg \left(x \cdot y \leq 10^{+240}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot x\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, t \cdot z\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 5: 85.1% accurate, 0.6× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;a \cdot b \leq -5 \cdot 10^{+81}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, y \cdot x\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;a \cdot b \leq 5 \cdot 10^{-21}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(t, z, y \cdot x\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, t \cdot z\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= (* a b) -5e+81)
   (fma b a (* y x))
   (if (<= (* a b) 5e-21) (fma t z (* y x)) (fma b a (* t z)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if ((a * b) <= -5e+81) {
		tmp = fma(b, a, (y * x));
	} else if ((a * b) <= 5e-21) {
		tmp = fma(t, z, (y * x));
	} else {
		tmp = fma(b, a, (t * z));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (Float64(a * b) <= -5e+81)
		tmp = fma(b, a, Float64(y * x));
	elseif (Float64(a * b) <= 5e-21)
		tmp = fma(t, z, Float64(y * x));
	else
		tmp = fma(b, a, Float64(t * z));
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := If[LessEqual[N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision], -5e+81], N[(b * a + N[(y * x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision], 5e-21], N[(t * z + N[(y * x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(b * a + N[(t * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if (*.f64 a b) < -4.9999999999999998e81

   1. Initial program 96.3%

      \[\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in z around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot b + x \cdot y} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{b \cdot a} + x \cdot y \]

      2. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, x \cdot y\right)} \]

      3. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \color{blue}{y \cdot x}\right) \]

      4. lower-*.f64 89.8

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \color{blue}{y \cdot x}\right) \]

   5. Applied rewrites 89.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, y \cdot x\right)} \]

   if -4.9999999999999998e81 < (*.f64 a b) < 4.99999999999999973e-21

   1. Initial program 99.2%

      \[\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot b + t \cdot z} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{b \cdot a} + t \cdot z \]

      2. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, t \cdot z\right)} \]

      3. lower-*.f64 54.4

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \color{blue}{t \cdot z}\right) \]

   5. Applied rewrites 54.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, t \cdot z\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in a around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{t \cdot z + x \cdot y} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

      1. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(t, z, x \cdot y\right)} \]

      2. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(t, z, \color{blue}{y \cdot x}\right) \]

      3. lower-*.f64 94.9

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(t, z, \color{blue}{y \cdot x}\right) \]

   8. Applied rewrites 94.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(t, z, y \cdot x\right)} \]

   if 4.99999999999999973e-21 < (*.f64 a b)

   1. Initial program 92.7%

      \[\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot b + t \cdot z} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{b \cdot a} + t \cdot z \]

      2. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, t \cdot z\right)} \]

      3. lower-*.f64 86.7

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \color{blue}{t \cdot z}\right) \]

   5. Applied rewrites 86.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, t \cdot z\right)} \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.
4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 6: 53.8% accurate, 0.8× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;a \cdot b \leq -5 \cdot 10^{+81} \lor \neg \left(a \cdot b \leq 5 \cdot 10^{-27}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;b \cdot a\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;t \cdot z\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= (* a b) -5e+81) (not (<= (* a b) 5e-27))) (* b a) (* t z)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if (((a * b) <= -5e+81) || !((a * b) <= 5e-27)) {
		tmp = b * a;
	} else {
		tmp = t * z;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (((a * b) <= (-5d+81)) .or. (.not. ((a * b) <= 5d-27))) then
        tmp = b * a
    else
        tmp = t * z
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if (((a * b) <= -5e+81) || !((a * b) <= 5e-27)) {
		tmp = b * a;
	} else {
		tmp = t * z;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b):
	tmp = 0
	if ((a * b) <= -5e+81) or not ((a * b) <= 5e-27):
		tmp = b * a
	else:
		tmp = t * z
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((Float64(a * b) <= -5e+81) || !(Float64(a * b) <= 5e-27))
		tmp = Float64(b * a);
	else
		tmp = Float64(t * z);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (((a * b) <= -5e+81) || ~(((a * b) <= 5e-27)))
		tmp = b * a;
	else
		tmp = t * z;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := If[Or[LessEqual[N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision], -5e+81], N[Not[LessEqual[N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision], 5e-27]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(b * a), $MachinePrecision], N[(t * z), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (*.f64 a b) < -4.9999999999999998e81 or 5.0000000000000002e-27 < (*.f64 a b)

   1. Initial program 94.3%

      \[\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in z around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot b + x \cdot y} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{b \cdot a} + x \cdot y \]

      2. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, x \cdot y\right)} \]

      3. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \color{blue}{y \cdot x}\right) \]

      4. lower-*.f64 85.9

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \color{blue}{y \cdot x}\right) \]

   5. Applied rewrites 85.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, y \cdot x\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in x around 0

      \[\leadsto a \cdot \color{blue}{b} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

   8. Applied rewrites 73.0%

      \[\leadsto b \cdot \color{blue}{a} \]

   if -4.9999999999999998e81 < (*.f64 a b) < 5.0000000000000002e-27

   1. Initial program 99.2%

      \[\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot b + t \cdot z} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{b \cdot a} + t \cdot z \]

      2. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, t \cdot z\right)} \]

      3. lower-*.f64 54.7

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \color{blue}{t \cdot z}\right) \]

   5. Applied rewrites 54.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, t \cdot z\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in a around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{t \cdot z + x \cdot y} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

      1. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(t, z, x \cdot y\right)} \]

      2. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(t, z, \color{blue}{y \cdot x}\right) \]

      3. lower-*.f64 94.9

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(t, z, \color{blue}{y \cdot x}\right) \]

   8. Applied rewrites 94.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(t, z, y \cdot x\right)} \]

   9. Taylor expanded in x around 0

      \[\leadsto t \cdot \color{blue}{z} \]
   10. Step-by-step derivation

   11. Applied rewrites 49.6%

       \[\leadsto t \cdot \color{blue}{z} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 60.9%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;a \cdot b \leq -5 \cdot 10^{+81} \lor \neg \left(a \cdot b \leq 5 \cdot 10^{-27}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;b \cdot a\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;t \cdot z\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 7: 34.9% accurate, 3.7× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ b \cdot a \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b) :precision binary64 (* b a))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	return b * a;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    code = b * a
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	return b * a;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b):
	return b * a

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	return Float64(b * a)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = b * a;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := N[(b * a), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 96.9%

   \[\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b \]
2. Add Preprocessing

3. Taylor expanded in z around 0

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot b + x \cdot y} \]
4. Step-by-step derivation

   1. *-commutative N/A

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{b \cdot a} + x \cdot y \]

   2. lower-fma.f64 N/A

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, x \cdot y\right)} \]

   3. *-commutative N/A

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \color{blue}{y \cdot x}\right) \]

   4. lower-*.f64 69.1

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \color{blue}{y \cdot x}\right) \]

5. Applied rewrites 69.1%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, y \cdot x\right)} \]

6. Taylor expanded in x around 0

   \[\leadsto a \cdot \color{blue}{b} \]
7. Step-by-step derivation

8. Applied rewrites 39.2%

   \[\leadsto b \cdot \color{blue}{a} \]
9. Add Preprocessing

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2024324 
(FPCore (x y z t a b)
  :name "Linear.V3:$cdot from linear-1.19.1.3, B"
  :precision binary64
  (+ (+ (* x y) (* z t)) (* a b)))