Graphics.Rasterific.CubicBezier:cachedBezierAt from Rasterific-0.6.1

Percentage Accurate: 92.3% → 96.5%

Time: 7.8s

Alternatives: 12

Speedup: 0.9×

• 32.2% of points produce a very large (infinite) output. You may want to add a precondition.

Specification

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b)
 :precision binary64
 (+ (+ (+ x (* y z)) (* t a)) (* (* a z) b)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	return ((x + (y * z)) + (t * a)) + ((a * z) * b);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    code = ((x + (y * z)) + (t * a)) + ((a * z) * b)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	return ((x + (y * z)) + (t * a)) + ((a * z) * b);
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b):
	return ((x + (y * z)) + (t * a)) + ((a * z) * b)

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(x + Float64(y * z)) + Float64(t * a)) + Float64(Float64(a * z) * b))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = ((x + (y * z)) + (t * a)) + ((a * z) * b);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := N[(N[(N[(x + N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(t * a), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(a * z), $MachinePrecision] * b), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Initial Program: 92.3% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b)
 :precision binary64
 (+ (+ (+ x (* y z)) (* t a)) (* (* a z) b)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	return ((x + (y * z)) + (t * a)) + ((a * z) * b);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    code = ((x + (y * z)) + (t * a)) + ((a * z) * b)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	return ((x + (y * z)) + (t * a)) + ((a * z) * b);
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b):
	return ((x + (y * z)) + (t * a)) + ((a * z) * b)

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(x + Float64(y * z)) + Float64(t * a)) + Float64(Float64(a * z) * b))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = ((x + (y * z)) + (t * a)) + ((a * z) * b);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := N[(N[(N[(x + N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(t * a), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(a * z), $MachinePrecision] * b), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Alternative 1: 96.5% accurate, 0.9× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -3.6 \cdot 10^{+199} \lor \neg \left(z \leq 6.8 \cdot 10^{+159}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, y\right), z, x\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(a, t + b \cdot z, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, y, x\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= z -3.6e+199) (not (<= z 6.8e+159)))
   (fma (fma b a y) z x)
   (fma a (+ t (* b z)) (fma z y x))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z <= -3.6e+199) || !(z <= 6.8e+159)) {
		tmp = fma(fma(b, a, y), z, x);
	} else {
		tmp = fma(a, (t + (b * z)), fma(z, y, x));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((z <= -3.6e+199) || !(z <= 6.8e+159))
		tmp = fma(fma(b, a, y), z, x);
	else
		tmp = fma(a, Float64(t + Float64(b * z)), fma(z, y, x));
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := If[Or[LessEqual[z, -3.6e+199], N[Not[LessEqual[z, 6.8e+159]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(N[(b * a + y), $MachinePrecision] * z + x), $MachinePrecision], N[(a * N[(t + N[(b * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * y + x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if z < -3.60000000000000001e199 or 6.79999999999999983e159 < z

   1. Initial program 84.4%

      \[\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in t around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \left(a \cdot \left(b \cdot z\right) + y \cdot z\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(a \cdot \left(b \cdot z\right) + y \cdot z\right) + x} \]

      2. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z + a \cdot \left(b \cdot z\right)\right)} + x \]

      3. associate-*r* N/A

         \[\leadsto \left(y \cdot z + \color{blue}{\left(a \cdot b\right) \cdot z}\right) + x \]

      4. distribute-rgt-in N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(y + a \cdot b\right)} + x \]

      5. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y + a \cdot b\right) \cdot z} + x \]

      6. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y + a \cdot b, z, x\right)} \]

      7. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{a \cdot b + y}, z, x\right) \]

      8. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{b \cdot a} + y, z, x\right) \]

      9. lower-fma.f64 98.2

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, y\right)}, z, x\right) \]

   5. Applied rewrites 98.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, y\right), z, x\right)} \]

   if -3.60000000000000001e199 < z < 6.79999999999999983e159

   1. Initial program 96.0%

      \[\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Add Preprocessing
   3. Step-by-step derivation

      1. lift-+.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b} \]

      2. lift-+.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right)} + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \]

      3. associate-+l+ N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b\right)} \]

      4. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(t \cdot a + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b\right) + \left(x + y \cdot z\right)} \]

      5. lift-*.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{t \cdot a} + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b\right) + \left(x + y \cdot z\right) \]

      6. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{a \cdot t} + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b\right) + \left(x + y \cdot z\right) \]

      7. lift-*.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \left(a \cdot t + \color{blue}{\left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b}\right) + \left(x + y \cdot z\right) \]

      8. lift-*.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \left(a \cdot t + \color{blue}{\left(a \cdot z\right)} \cdot b\right) + \left(x + y \cdot z\right) \]

      9. associate-*l* N/A

         \[\leadsto \left(a \cdot t + \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(z \cdot b\right)}\right) + \left(x + y \cdot z\right) \]

      10. distribute-lft-out N/A

          \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(t + z \cdot b\right)} + \left(x + y \cdot z\right) \]

      11. lower-fma.f64 N/A

          \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(a, t + z \cdot b, x + y \cdot z\right)} \]

      12. lower-+.f64 N/A

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(a, \color{blue}{t + z \cdot b}, x + y \cdot z\right) \]

      13. *-commutative N/A

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(a, t + \color{blue}{b \cdot z}, x + y \cdot z\right) \]

      14. lower-*.f64 98.0

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(a, t + \color{blue}{b \cdot z}, x + y \cdot z\right) \]

      15. lift-+.f64 N/A

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(a, t + b \cdot z, \color{blue}{x + y \cdot z}\right) \]

      16. +-commutative N/A

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(a, t + b \cdot z, \color{blue}{y \cdot z + x}\right) \]

      17. lift-*.f64 N/A

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(a, t + b \cdot z, \color{blue}{y \cdot z} + x\right) \]

      18. *-commutative N/A

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(a, t + b \cdot z, \color{blue}{z \cdot y} + x\right) \]

      19. lower-fma.f64 98.0

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(a, t + b \cdot z, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, y, x\right)}\right) \]

   4. Applied rewrites 98.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(a, t + b \cdot z, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, y, x\right)\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 98.1%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -3.6 \cdot 10^{+199} \lor \neg \left(z \leq 6.8 \cdot 10^{+159}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, y\right), z, x\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(a, t + b \cdot z, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, y, x\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 2: 96.4% accurate, 0.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_1 := \left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b\\ \mathbf{if}\;t\_1 \leq \infty:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_1\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(b, z, t\right) \cdot a\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_1 (+ (+ (+ x (* y z)) (* t a)) (* (* a z) b))))
   (if (<= t_1 INFINITY) t_1 (* (fma b z t) a))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double t_1 = ((x + (y * z)) + (t * a)) + ((a * z) * b);
	double tmp;
	if (t_1 <= ((double) INFINITY)) {
		tmp = t_1;
	} else {
		tmp = fma(b, z, t) * a;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	t_1 = Float64(Float64(Float64(x + Float64(y * z)) + Float64(t * a)) + Float64(Float64(a * z) * b))
	tmp = 0.0
	if (t_1 <= Inf)
		tmp = t_1;
	else
		tmp = Float64(fma(b, z, t) * a);
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := Block[{t$95$1 = N[(N[(N[(x + N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(t * a), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(a * z), $MachinePrecision] * b), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[t$95$1, Infinity], t$95$1, N[(N[(b * z + t), $MachinePrecision] * a), $MachinePrecision]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (+.f64 (+.f64 (+.f64 x (*.f64 y z)) (*.f64 t a)) (*.f64 (*.f64 a z) b)) < +inf.0

   1. Initial program 97.6%

      \[\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   if +inf.0 < (+.f64 (+.f64 (+.f64 x (*.f64 y z)) (*.f64 t a)) (*.f64 (*.f64 a z) b))

   1. Initial program 0.0%

      \[\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in a around inf

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(t + b \cdot z\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(t + b \cdot z\right) \cdot a} \]

      2. lower-*.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(t + b \cdot z\right) \cdot a} \]

      3. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(b \cdot z + t\right)} \cdot a \]

      4. lower-fma.f64 90.9

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, z, t\right)} \cdot a \]

   5. Applied rewrites 90.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, z, t\right) \cdot a} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 3: 62.1% accurate, 0.7× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_1 := \mathsf{fma}\left(a \cdot b, z, x\right)\\ \mathbf{if}\;t \leq -3.9 \cdot 10^{+132}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(a, t, x\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;t \leq -2.15 \cdot 10^{+21}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(z, y, x\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;t \leq 1.95 \cdot 10^{-243}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_1\\ \mathbf{elif}\;t \leq 4.8 \cdot 10^{-138}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(z, y, x\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;t \leq 3.4 \cdot 10^{+80}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_1\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(a, t, x\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_1 (fma (* a b) z x)))
   (if (<= t -3.9e+132)
     (fma a t x)
     (if (<= t -2.15e+21)
       (fma z y x)
       (if (<= t 1.95e-243)
         t_1
         (if (<= t 4.8e-138)
           (fma z y x)
           (if (<= t 3.4e+80) t_1 (fma a t x))))))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double t_1 = fma((a * b), z, x);
	double tmp;
	if (t <= -3.9e+132) {
		tmp = fma(a, t, x);
	} else if (t <= -2.15e+21) {
		tmp = fma(z, y, x);
	} else if (t <= 1.95e-243) {
		tmp = t_1;
	} else if (t <= 4.8e-138) {
		tmp = fma(z, y, x);
	} else if (t <= 3.4e+80) {
		tmp = t_1;
	} else {
		tmp = fma(a, t, x);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	t_1 = fma(Float64(a * b), z, x)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (t <= -3.9e+132)
		tmp = fma(a, t, x);
	elseif (t <= -2.15e+21)
		tmp = fma(z, y, x);
	elseif (t <= 1.95e-243)
		tmp = t_1;
	elseif (t <= 4.8e-138)
		tmp = fma(z, y, x);
	elseif (t <= 3.4e+80)
		tmp = t_1;
	else
		tmp = fma(a, t, x);
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := Block[{t$95$1 = N[(N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision] * z + x), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[t, -3.9e+132], N[(a * t + x), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[t, -2.15e+21], N[(z * y + x), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[t, 1.95e-243], t$95$1, If[LessEqual[t, 4.8e-138], N[(z * y + x), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[t, 3.4e+80], t$95$1, N[(a * t + x), $MachinePrecision]]]]]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if t < -3.90000000000000001e132 or 3.39999999999999992e80 < t

   1. Initial program 92.6%

      \[\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in t around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \left(a \cdot \left(b \cdot z\right) + y \cdot z\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(a \cdot \left(b \cdot z\right) + y \cdot z\right) + x} \]

      2. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z + a \cdot \left(b \cdot z\right)\right)} + x \]

      3. associate-*r* N/A

         \[\leadsto \left(y \cdot z + \color{blue}{\left(a \cdot b\right) \cdot z}\right) + x \]

      4. distribute-rgt-in N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(y + a \cdot b\right)} + x \]

      5. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y + a \cdot b\right) \cdot z} + x \]

      6. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y + a \cdot b, z, x\right)} \]

      7. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{a \cdot b + y}, z, x\right) \]

      8. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{b \cdot a} + y, z, x\right) \]

      9. lower-fma.f64 55.6

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, y\right)}, z, x\right) \]

   5. Applied rewrites 55.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, y\right), z, x\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in z around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + a \cdot t} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot t + x} \]

      2. lower-fma.f64 74.6

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(a, t, x\right)} \]

   8. Applied rewrites 74.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(a, t, x\right)} \]

   if -3.90000000000000001e132 < t < -2.15e21 or 1.95000000000000008e-243 < t < 4.7999999999999998e-138

   1. Initial program 94.9%

      \[\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in t around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \left(a \cdot \left(b \cdot z\right) + y \cdot z\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(a \cdot \left(b \cdot z\right) + y \cdot z\right) + x} \]

      2. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z + a \cdot \left(b \cdot z\right)\right)} + x \]

      3. associate-*r* N/A

         \[\leadsto \left(y \cdot z + \color{blue}{\left(a \cdot b\right) \cdot z}\right) + x \]

      4. distribute-rgt-in N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(y + a \cdot b\right)} + x \]

      5. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y + a \cdot b\right) \cdot z} + x \]

      6. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y + a \cdot b, z, x\right)} \]

      7. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{a \cdot b + y}, z, x\right) \]

      8. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{b \cdot a} + y, z, x\right) \]

      9. lower-fma.f64 93.1

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, y\right)}, z, x\right) \]

   5. Applied rewrites 93.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, y\right), z, x\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in a around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + y \cdot z} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot z + x} \]

      2. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot y} + x \]

      3. lower-fma.f64 79.7

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, y, x\right)} \]

   8. Applied rewrites 79.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, y, x\right)} \]

   if -2.15e21 < t < 1.95000000000000008e-243 or 4.7999999999999998e-138 < t < 3.39999999999999992e80

   1. Initial program 93.3%

      \[\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in y around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \left(a \cdot t + a \cdot \left(b \cdot z\right)\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. distribute-lft-in N/A

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(t + b \cdot z\right)} \]

      2. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(t + b \cdot z\right) + x} \]

      3. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(t + b \cdot z\right) \cdot a} + x \]

      4. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(t + b \cdot z, a, x\right)} \]

      5. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{b \cdot z + t}, a, x\right) \]

      6. lower-fma.f64 81.0

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, z, t\right)}, a, x\right) \]

   5. Applied rewrites 81.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(b, z, t\right), a, x\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in t around 0

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(b \cdot z\right)} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

   8. Applied rewrites 78.8%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(a \cdot b, \color{blue}{z}, x\right) \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.
4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 4: 63.3% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_1 := \mathsf{fma}\left(a, t, z \cdot y\right)\\ \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -6 \cdot 10^{+160}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_1\\ \mathbf{elif}\;y \leq -2.7 \cdot 10^{-186}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(a, t, x\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;y \leq 3.8 \cdot 10^{-20}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(a \cdot b, z, x\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_1\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_1 (fma a t (* z y))))
   (if (<= y -6e+160)
     t_1
     (if (<= y -2.7e-186)
       (fma a t x)
       (if (<= y 3.8e-20) (fma (* a b) z x) t_1)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double t_1 = fma(a, t, (z * y));
	double tmp;
	if (y <= -6e+160) {
		tmp = t_1;
	} else if (y <= -2.7e-186) {
		tmp = fma(a, t, x);
	} else if (y <= 3.8e-20) {
		tmp = fma((a * b), z, x);
	} else {
		tmp = t_1;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	t_1 = fma(a, t, Float64(z * y))
	tmp = 0.0
	if (y <= -6e+160)
		tmp = t_1;
	elseif (y <= -2.7e-186)
		tmp = fma(a, t, x);
	elseif (y <= 3.8e-20)
		tmp = fma(Float64(a * b), z, x);
	else
		tmp = t_1;
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := Block[{t$95$1 = N[(a * t + N[(z * y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[y, -6e+160], t$95$1, If[LessEqual[y, -2.7e-186], N[(a * t + x), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[y, 3.8e-20], N[(N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision] * z + x), $MachinePrecision], t$95$1]]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if y < -5.9999999999999997e160 or 3.7999999999999998e-20 < y

   1. Initial program 92.5%

      \[\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in t around inf

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot t} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. lower-*.f64 25.0

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot t} \]

   5. Applied rewrites 25.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot t} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in x around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot t + \left(a \cdot \left(b \cdot z\right) + y \cdot z\right)} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+r+ N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(a \cdot t + a \cdot \left(b \cdot z\right)\right) + y \cdot z} \]

      2. distribute-lft-in N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(t + b \cdot z\right)} + y \cdot z \]

      3. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(t + b \cdot z\right) \cdot a} + y \cdot z \]

      4. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(t + b \cdot z, a, y \cdot z\right)} \]

      5. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{b \cdot z + t}, a, y \cdot z\right) \]

      6. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{z \cdot b} + t, a, y \cdot z\right) \]

      7. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, b, t\right)}, a, y \cdot z\right) \]

      8. lower-*.f64 80.0

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(z, b, t\right), a, \color{blue}{y \cdot z}\right) \]

   8. Applied rewrites 80.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(z, b, t\right), a, y \cdot z\right)} \]

   9. Taylor expanded in b around 0

      \[\leadsto a \cdot t + \color{blue}{y \cdot z} \]
   10. Step-by-step derivation

   11. Applied rewrites 75.6%

       \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(a, \color{blue}{t}, z \cdot y\right) \]

   if -5.9999999999999997e160 < y < -2.6999999999999999e-186

   1. Initial program 98.3%

      \[\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in t around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \left(a \cdot \left(b \cdot z\right) + y \cdot z\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(a \cdot \left(b \cdot z\right) + y \cdot z\right) + x} \]

      2. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z + a \cdot \left(b \cdot z\right)\right)} + x \]

      3. associate-*r* N/A

         \[\leadsto \left(y \cdot z + \color{blue}{\left(a \cdot b\right) \cdot z}\right) + x \]

      4. distribute-rgt-in N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(y + a \cdot b\right)} + x \]

      5. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y + a \cdot b\right) \cdot z} + x \]

      6. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y + a \cdot b, z, x\right)} \]

      7. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{a \cdot b + y}, z, x\right) \]

      8. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{b \cdot a} + y, z, x\right) \]

      9. lower-fma.f64 66.8

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, y\right)}, z, x\right) \]

   5. Applied rewrites 66.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, y\right), z, x\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in z around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + a \cdot t} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot t + x} \]

      2. lower-fma.f64 71.2

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(a, t, x\right)} \]

   8. Applied rewrites 71.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(a, t, x\right)} \]

   if -2.6999999999999999e-186 < y < 3.7999999999999998e-20

   1. Initial program 91.3%

      \[\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in y around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \left(a \cdot t + a \cdot \left(b \cdot z\right)\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. distribute-lft-in N/A

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(t + b \cdot z\right)} \]

      2. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(t + b \cdot z\right) + x} \]

      3. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(t + b \cdot z\right) \cdot a} + x \]

      4. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(t + b \cdot z, a, x\right)} \]

      5. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{b \cdot z + t}, a, x\right) \]

      6. lower-fma.f64 89.4

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, z, t\right)}, a, x\right) \]

   5. Applied rewrites 89.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(b, z, t\right), a, x\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in t around 0

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(b \cdot z\right)} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

   8. Applied rewrites 79.9%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(a \cdot b, \color{blue}{z}, x\right) \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.
4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 5: 86.0% accurate, 1.2× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -7.5 \cdot 10^{+108} \lor \neg \left(z \leq 1.2 \cdot 10^{-50}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, y\right), z, x\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(b, z, t\right), a, x\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= z -7.5e+108) (not (<= z 1.2e-50)))
   (fma (fma b a y) z x)
   (fma (fma b z t) a x)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z <= -7.5e+108) || !(z <= 1.2e-50)) {
		tmp = fma(fma(b, a, y), z, x);
	} else {
		tmp = fma(fma(b, z, t), a, x);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((z <= -7.5e+108) || !(z <= 1.2e-50))
		tmp = fma(fma(b, a, y), z, x);
	else
		tmp = fma(fma(b, z, t), a, x);
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := If[Or[LessEqual[z, -7.5e+108], N[Not[LessEqual[z, 1.2e-50]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(N[(b * a + y), $MachinePrecision] * z + x), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[(b * z + t), $MachinePrecision] * a + x), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if z < -7.50000000000000039e108 or 1.20000000000000001e-50 < z

   1. Initial program 86.8%

      \[\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in t around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \left(a \cdot \left(b \cdot z\right) + y \cdot z\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(a \cdot \left(b \cdot z\right) + y \cdot z\right) + x} \]

      2. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z + a \cdot \left(b \cdot z\right)\right)} + x \]

      3. associate-*r* N/A

         \[\leadsto \left(y \cdot z + \color{blue}{\left(a \cdot b\right) \cdot z}\right) + x \]

      4. distribute-rgt-in N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(y + a \cdot b\right)} + x \]

      5. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y + a \cdot b\right) \cdot z} + x \]

      6. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y + a \cdot b, z, x\right)} \]

      7. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{a \cdot b + y}, z, x\right) \]

      8. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{b \cdot a} + y, z, x\right) \]

      9. lower-fma.f64 93.9

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, y\right)}, z, x\right) \]

   5. Applied rewrites 93.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, y\right), z, x\right)} \]

   if -7.50000000000000039e108 < z < 1.20000000000000001e-50

   1. Initial program 99.2%

      \[\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in y around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \left(a \cdot t + a \cdot \left(b \cdot z\right)\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. distribute-lft-in N/A

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(t + b \cdot z\right)} \]

      2. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(t + b \cdot z\right) + x} \]

      3. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(t + b \cdot z\right) \cdot a} + x \]

      4. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(t + b \cdot z, a, x\right)} \]

      5. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{b \cdot z + t}, a, x\right) \]

      6. lower-fma.f64 88.7

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, z, t\right)}, a, x\right) \]

   5. Applied rewrites 88.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(b, z, t\right), a, x\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 91.1%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -7.5 \cdot 10^{+108} \lor \neg \left(z \leq 1.2 \cdot 10^{-50}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, y\right), z, x\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(b, z, t\right), a, x\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 6: 82.5% accurate, 1.2× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -2.55 \cdot 10^{-48} \lor \neg \left(z \leq 1.95 \cdot 10^{-150}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, y\right), z, x\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(a, t, x\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= z -2.55e-48) (not (<= z 1.95e-150)))
   (fma (fma b a y) z x)
   (fma a t x)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z <= -2.55e-48) || !(z <= 1.95e-150)) {
		tmp = fma(fma(b, a, y), z, x);
	} else {
		tmp = fma(a, t, x);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((z <= -2.55e-48) || !(z <= 1.95e-150))
		tmp = fma(fma(b, a, y), z, x);
	else
		tmp = fma(a, t, x);
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := If[Or[LessEqual[z, -2.55e-48], N[Not[LessEqual[z, 1.95e-150]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(N[(b * a + y), $MachinePrecision] * z + x), $MachinePrecision], N[(a * t + x), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if z < -2.55000000000000006e-48 or 1.9500000000000001e-150 < z

   1. Initial program 90.7%

      \[\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in t around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \left(a \cdot \left(b \cdot z\right) + y \cdot z\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(a \cdot \left(b \cdot z\right) + y \cdot z\right) + x} \]

      2. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z + a \cdot \left(b \cdot z\right)\right)} + x \]

      3. associate-*r* N/A

         \[\leadsto \left(y \cdot z + \color{blue}{\left(a \cdot b\right) \cdot z}\right) + x \]

      4. distribute-rgt-in N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(y + a \cdot b\right)} + x \]

      5. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y + a \cdot b\right) \cdot z} + x \]

      6. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y + a \cdot b, z, x\right)} \]

      7. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{a \cdot b + y}, z, x\right) \]

      8. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{b \cdot a} + y, z, x\right) \]

      9. lower-fma.f64 89.7

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, y\right)}, z, x\right) \]

   5. Applied rewrites 89.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, y\right), z, x\right)} \]

   if -2.55000000000000006e-48 < z < 1.9500000000000001e-150

   1. Initial program 98.9%

      \[\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in t around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \left(a \cdot \left(b \cdot z\right) + y \cdot z\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(a \cdot \left(b \cdot z\right) + y \cdot z\right) + x} \]

      2. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z + a \cdot \left(b \cdot z\right)\right)} + x \]

      3. associate-*r* N/A

         \[\leadsto \left(y \cdot z + \color{blue}{\left(a \cdot b\right) \cdot z}\right) + x \]

      4. distribute-rgt-in N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(y + a \cdot b\right)} + x \]

      5. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y + a \cdot b\right) \cdot z} + x \]

      6. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y + a \cdot b, z, x\right)} \]

      7. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{a \cdot b + y}, z, x\right) \]

      8. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{b \cdot a} + y, z, x\right) \]

      9. lower-fma.f64 56.3

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, y\right)}, z, x\right) \]

   5. Applied rewrites 56.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, y\right), z, x\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in z around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + a \cdot t} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot t + x} \]

      2. lower-fma.f64 87.7

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(a, t, x\right)} \]

   8. Applied rewrites 87.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(a, t, x\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 89.0%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -2.55 \cdot 10^{-48} \lor \neg \left(z \leq 1.95 \cdot 10^{-150}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, y\right), z, x\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(a, t, x\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 7: 73.8% accurate, 1.2× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;a \leq -4.6 \cdot 10^{-31} \lor \neg \left(a \leq 4 \cdot 10^{+72}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(b, z, t\right) \cdot a\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(z, y, x\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= a -4.6e-31) (not (<= a 4e+72))) (* (fma b z t) a) (fma z y x)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if ((a <= -4.6e-31) || !(a <= 4e+72)) {
		tmp = fma(b, z, t) * a;
	} else {
		tmp = fma(z, y, x);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((a <= -4.6e-31) || !(a <= 4e+72))
		tmp = Float64(fma(b, z, t) * a);
	else
		tmp = fma(z, y, x);
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := If[Or[LessEqual[a, -4.6e-31], N[Not[LessEqual[a, 4e+72]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(N[(b * z + t), $MachinePrecision] * a), $MachinePrecision], N[(z * y + x), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if a < -4.5999999999999997e-31 or 3.99999999999999978e72 < a

   1. Initial program 88.3%

      \[\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in a around inf

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(t + b \cdot z\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(t + b \cdot z\right) \cdot a} \]

      2. lower-*.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(t + b \cdot z\right) \cdot a} \]

      3. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(b \cdot z + t\right)} \cdot a \]

      4. lower-fma.f64 80.5

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, z, t\right)} \cdot a \]

   5. Applied rewrites 80.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, z, t\right) \cdot a} \]

   if -4.5999999999999997e-31 < a < 3.99999999999999978e72

   1. Initial program 98.4%

      \[\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in t around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \left(a \cdot \left(b \cdot z\right) + y \cdot z\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(a \cdot \left(b \cdot z\right) + y \cdot z\right) + x} \]

      2. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z + a \cdot \left(b \cdot z\right)\right)} + x \]

      3. associate-*r* N/A

         \[\leadsto \left(y \cdot z + \color{blue}{\left(a \cdot b\right) \cdot z}\right) + x \]

      4. distribute-rgt-in N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(y + a \cdot b\right)} + x \]

      5. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y + a \cdot b\right) \cdot z} + x \]

      6. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y + a \cdot b, z, x\right)} \]

      7. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{a \cdot b + y}, z, x\right) \]

      8. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{b \cdot a} + y, z, x\right) \]

      9. lower-fma.f64 90.7

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, y\right)}, z, x\right) \]

   5. Applied rewrites 90.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, y\right), z, x\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in a around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + y \cdot z} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot z + x} \]

      2. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot y} + x \]

      3. lower-fma.f64 78.0

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, y, x\right)} \]

   8. Applied rewrites 78.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, y, x\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 79.3%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;a \leq -4.6 \cdot 10^{-31} \lor \neg \left(a \leq 4 \cdot 10^{+72}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(b, z, t\right) \cdot a\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(z, y, x\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 8: 74.6% accurate, 1.2× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -4.5 \cdot 10^{-30} \lor \neg \left(z \leq 2.6 \cdot 10^{-16}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, y\right) \cdot z\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(a, t, x\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= z -4.5e-30) (not (<= z 2.6e-16))) (* (fma b a y) z) (fma a t x)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z <= -4.5e-30) || !(z <= 2.6e-16)) {
		tmp = fma(b, a, y) * z;
	} else {
		tmp = fma(a, t, x);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((z <= -4.5e-30) || !(z <= 2.6e-16))
		tmp = Float64(fma(b, a, y) * z);
	else
		tmp = fma(a, t, x);
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := If[Or[LessEqual[z, -4.5e-30], N[Not[LessEqual[z, 2.6e-16]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(N[(b * a + y), $MachinePrecision] * z), $MachinePrecision], N[(a * t + x), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if z < -4.49999999999999967e-30 or 2.5999999999999998e-16 < z

   1. Initial program 88.8%

      \[\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in z around inf

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(y + a \cdot b\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y + a \cdot b\right) \cdot z} \]

      2. lower-*.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y + a \cdot b\right) \cdot z} \]

      3. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(a \cdot b + y\right)} \cdot z \]

      4. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{b \cdot a} + y\right) \cdot z \]

      5. lower-fma.f64 77.1

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, y\right)} \cdot z \]

   5. Applied rewrites 77.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, y\right) \cdot z} \]

   if -4.49999999999999967e-30 < z < 2.5999999999999998e-16

   1. Initial program 99.1%

      \[\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in t around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \left(a \cdot \left(b \cdot z\right) + y \cdot z\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(a \cdot \left(b \cdot z\right) + y \cdot z\right) + x} \]

      2. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z + a \cdot \left(b \cdot z\right)\right)} + x \]

      3. associate-*r* N/A

         \[\leadsto \left(y \cdot z + \color{blue}{\left(a \cdot b\right) \cdot z}\right) + x \]

      4. distribute-rgt-in N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(y + a \cdot b\right)} + x \]

      5. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y + a \cdot b\right) \cdot z} + x \]

      6. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y + a \cdot b, z, x\right)} \]

      7. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{a \cdot b + y}, z, x\right) \]

      8. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{b \cdot a} + y, z, x\right) \]

      9. lower-fma.f64 62.1

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, y\right)}, z, x\right) \]

   5. Applied rewrites 62.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, y\right), z, x\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in z around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + a \cdot t} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot t + x} \]

      2. lower-fma.f64 80.0

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(a, t, x\right)} \]

   8. Applied rewrites 80.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(a, t, x\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 78.4%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -4.5 \cdot 10^{-30} \lor \neg \left(z \leq 2.6 \cdot 10^{-16}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, y\right) \cdot z\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(a, t, x\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 9: 62.6% accurate, 1.6× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;t \leq -3.9 \cdot 10^{+132} \lor \neg \left(t \leq 6.4 \cdot 10^{+134}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(a, t, x\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(z, y, x\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= t -3.9e+132) (not (<= t 6.4e+134))) (fma a t x) (fma z y x)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if ((t <= -3.9e+132) || !(t <= 6.4e+134)) {
		tmp = fma(a, t, x);
	} else {
		tmp = fma(z, y, x);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((t <= -3.9e+132) || !(t <= 6.4e+134))
		tmp = fma(a, t, x);
	else
		tmp = fma(z, y, x);
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := If[Or[LessEqual[t, -3.9e+132], N[Not[LessEqual[t, 6.4e+134]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(a * t + x), $MachinePrecision], N[(z * y + x), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if t < -3.90000000000000001e132 or 6.4000000000000001e134 < t

   1. Initial program 92.0%

      \[\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in t around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \left(a \cdot \left(b \cdot z\right) + y \cdot z\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(a \cdot \left(b \cdot z\right) + y \cdot z\right) + x} \]

      2. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z + a \cdot \left(b \cdot z\right)\right)} + x \]

      3. associate-*r* N/A

         \[\leadsto \left(y \cdot z + \color{blue}{\left(a \cdot b\right) \cdot z}\right) + x \]

      4. distribute-rgt-in N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(y + a \cdot b\right)} + x \]

      5. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y + a \cdot b\right) \cdot z} + x \]

      6. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y + a \cdot b, z, x\right)} \]

      7. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{a \cdot b + y}, z, x\right) \]

      8. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{b \cdot a} + y, z, x\right) \]

      9. lower-fma.f64 53.2

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, y\right)}, z, x\right) \]

   5. Applied rewrites 53.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, y\right), z, x\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in z around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + a \cdot t} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot t + x} \]

      2. lower-fma.f64 76.8

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(a, t, x\right)} \]

   8. Applied rewrites 76.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(a, t, x\right)} \]

   if -3.90000000000000001e132 < t < 6.4000000000000001e134

   1. Initial program 94.2%

      \[\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in t around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \left(a \cdot \left(b \cdot z\right) + y \cdot z\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(a \cdot \left(b \cdot z\right) + y \cdot z\right) + x} \]

      2. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z + a \cdot \left(b \cdot z\right)\right)} + x \]

      3. associate-*r* N/A

         \[\leadsto \left(y \cdot z + \color{blue}{\left(a \cdot b\right) \cdot z}\right) + x \]

      4. distribute-rgt-in N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(y + a \cdot b\right)} + x \]

      5. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y + a \cdot b\right) \cdot z} + x \]

      6. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y + a \cdot b, z, x\right)} \]

      7. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{a \cdot b + y}, z, x\right) \]

      8. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{b \cdot a} + y, z, x\right) \]

      9. lower-fma.f64 91.7

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, y\right)}, z, x\right) \]

   5. Applied rewrites 91.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, y\right), z, x\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in a around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + y \cdot z} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot z + x} \]

      2. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot y} + x \]

      3. lower-fma.f64 62.3

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, y, x\right)} \]

   8. Applied rewrites 62.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, y, x\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 67.3%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;t \leq -3.9 \cdot 10^{+132} \lor \neg \left(t \leq 6.4 \cdot 10^{+134}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(a, t, x\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(z, y, x\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 10: 58.5% accurate, 1.6× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -1.9 \cdot 10^{+163} \lor \neg \left(y \leq 1.4 \cdot 10^{+140}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot y\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(a, t, x\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= y -1.9e+163) (not (<= y 1.4e+140))) (* z y) (fma a t x)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if ((y <= -1.9e+163) || !(y <= 1.4e+140)) {
		tmp = z * y;
	} else {
		tmp = fma(a, t, x);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((y <= -1.9e+163) || !(y <= 1.4e+140))
		tmp = Float64(z * y);
	else
		tmp = fma(a, t, x);
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := If[Or[LessEqual[y, -1.9e+163], N[Not[LessEqual[y, 1.4e+140]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(z * y), $MachinePrecision], N[(a * t + x), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if y < -1.90000000000000004e163 or 1.39999999999999991e140 < y

   1. Initial program 93.5%

      \[\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in t around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \left(a \cdot \left(b \cdot z\right) + y \cdot z\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(a \cdot \left(b \cdot z\right) + y \cdot z\right) + x} \]

      2. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z + a \cdot \left(b \cdot z\right)\right)} + x \]

      3. associate-*r* N/A

         \[\leadsto \left(y \cdot z + \color{blue}{\left(a \cdot b\right) \cdot z}\right) + x \]

      4. distribute-rgt-in N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(y + a \cdot b\right)} + x \]

      5. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y + a \cdot b\right) \cdot z} + x \]

      6. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y + a \cdot b, z, x\right)} \]

      7. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{a \cdot b + y}, z, x\right) \]

      8. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{b \cdot a} + y, z, x\right) \]

      9. lower-fma.f64 82.4

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, y\right)}, z, x\right) \]

   5. Applied rewrites 82.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, y\right), z, x\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in a around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + y \cdot z} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot z + x} \]

      2. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot y} + x \]

      3. lower-fma.f64 73.4

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, y, x\right)} \]

   8. Applied rewrites 73.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, y, x\right)} \]

   9. Taylor expanded in x around 0

      \[\leadsto y \cdot \color{blue}{z} \]
   10. Step-by-step derivation

   11. Applied rewrites 63.4%

       \[\leadsto z \cdot \color{blue}{y} \]

   if -1.90000000000000004e163 < y < 1.39999999999999991e140

   1. Initial program 93.4%

      \[\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in t around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \left(a \cdot \left(b \cdot z\right) + y \cdot z\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(a \cdot \left(b \cdot z\right) + y \cdot z\right) + x} \]

      2. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z + a \cdot \left(b \cdot z\right)\right)} + x \]

      3. associate-*r* N/A

         \[\leadsto \left(y \cdot z + \color{blue}{\left(a \cdot b\right) \cdot z}\right) + x \]

      4. distribute-rgt-in N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(y + a \cdot b\right)} + x \]

      5. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y + a \cdot b\right) \cdot z} + x \]

      6. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y + a \cdot b, z, x\right)} \]

      7. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{a \cdot b + y}, z, x\right) \]

      8. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{b \cdot a} + y, z, x\right) \]

      9. lower-fma.f64 76.9

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, y\right)}, z, x\right) \]

   5. Applied rewrites 76.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, y\right), z, x\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in z around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + a \cdot t} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot t + x} \]

      2. lower-fma.f64 61.2

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(a, t, x\right)} \]

   8. Applied rewrites 61.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(a, t, x\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 61.8%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -1.9 \cdot 10^{+163} \lor \neg \left(y \leq 1.4 \cdot 10^{+140}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot y\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(a, t, x\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 11: 38.4% accurate, 1.7× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;t \leq -3.9 \cdot 10^{+132} \lor \neg \left(t \leq 1.05 \cdot 10^{+135}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot t\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot y\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= t -3.9e+132) (not (<= t 1.05e+135))) (* a t) (* z y)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if ((t <= -3.9e+132) || !(t <= 1.05e+135)) {
		tmp = a * t;
	} else {
		tmp = z * y;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((t <= (-3.9d+132)) .or. (.not. (t <= 1.05d+135))) then
        tmp = a * t
    else
        tmp = z * y
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if ((t <= -3.9e+132) || !(t <= 1.05e+135)) {
		tmp = a * t;
	} else {
		tmp = z * y;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b):
	tmp = 0
	if (t <= -3.9e+132) or not (t <= 1.05e+135):
		tmp = a * t
	else:
		tmp = z * y
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((t <= -3.9e+132) || !(t <= 1.05e+135))
		tmp = Float64(a * t);
	else
		tmp = Float64(z * y);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((t <= -3.9e+132) || ~((t <= 1.05e+135)))
		tmp = a * t;
	else
		tmp = z * y;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := If[Or[LessEqual[t, -3.9e+132], N[Not[LessEqual[t, 1.05e+135]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(a * t), $MachinePrecision], N[(z * y), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if t < -3.90000000000000001e132 or 1.05000000000000005e135 < t

   1. Initial program 92.0%

      \[\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in t around inf

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot t} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. lower-*.f64 59.0

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot t} \]

   5. Applied rewrites 59.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot t} \]

   if -3.90000000000000001e132 < t < 1.05000000000000005e135

   1. Initial program 94.2%

      \[\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in t around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \left(a \cdot \left(b \cdot z\right) + y \cdot z\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(a \cdot \left(b \cdot z\right) + y \cdot z\right) + x} \]

      2. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z + a \cdot \left(b \cdot z\right)\right)} + x \]

      3. associate-*r* N/A

         \[\leadsto \left(y \cdot z + \color{blue}{\left(a \cdot b\right) \cdot z}\right) + x \]

      4. distribute-rgt-in N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(y + a \cdot b\right)} + x \]

      5. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y + a \cdot b\right) \cdot z} + x \]

      6. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y + a \cdot b, z, x\right)} \]

      7. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{a \cdot b + y}, z, x\right) \]

      8. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{b \cdot a} + y, z, x\right) \]

      9. lower-fma.f64 91.7

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, y\right)}, z, x\right) \]

   5. Applied rewrites 91.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, y\right), z, x\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in a around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + y \cdot z} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot z + x} \]

      2. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot y} + x \]

      3. lower-fma.f64 62.3

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, y, x\right)} \]

   8. Applied rewrites 62.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, y, x\right)} \]

   9. Taylor expanded in x around 0

      \[\leadsto y \cdot \color{blue}{z} \]
   10. Step-by-step derivation

   11. Applied rewrites 32.4%

       \[\leadsto z \cdot \color{blue}{y} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 41.5%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;t \leq -3.9 \cdot 10^{+132} \lor \neg \left(t \leq 1.05 \cdot 10^{+135}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot t\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot y\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 12: 28.7% accurate, 5.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ z \cdot y \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b) :precision binary64 (* z y))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	return z * y;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    code = z * y
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	return z * y;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b):
	return z * y

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	return Float64(z * y)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = z * y;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := N[(z * y), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 93.4%

   \[\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \]
2. Add Preprocessing

3. Taylor expanded in t around 0

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \left(a \cdot \left(b \cdot z\right) + y \cdot z\right)} \]
4. Step-by-step derivation

   1. +-commutative N/A

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(a \cdot \left(b \cdot z\right) + y \cdot z\right) + x} \]

   2. +-commutative N/A

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z + a \cdot \left(b \cdot z\right)\right)} + x \]

   3. associate-*r* N/A

      \[\leadsto \left(y \cdot z + \color{blue}{\left(a \cdot b\right) \cdot z}\right) + x \]

   4. distribute-rgt-in N/A

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(y + a \cdot b\right)} + x \]

   5. *-commutative N/A

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y + a \cdot b\right) \cdot z} + x \]

   6. lower-fma.f64 N/A

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y + a \cdot b, z, x\right)} \]

   7. +-commutative N/A

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{a \cdot b + y}, z, x\right) \]

   8. *-commutative N/A

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{b \cdot a} + y, z, x\right) \]

   9. lower-fma.f64 78.5

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, y\right)}, z, x\right) \]

5. Applied rewrites 78.5%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, y\right), z, x\right)} \]

6. Taylor expanded in a around 0

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + y \cdot z} \]
7. Step-by-step derivation

   1. +-commutative N/A

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot z + x} \]

   2. *-commutative N/A

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot y} + x \]

   3. lower-fma.f64 53.7

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, y, x\right)} \]

8. Applied rewrites 53.7%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, y, x\right)} \]

9. Taylor expanded in x around 0

   \[\leadsto y \cdot \color{blue}{z} \]
10. Step-by-step derivation

11. Applied rewrites 28.3%

    \[\leadsto z \cdot \color{blue}{y} \]
12. Add Preprocessing

Developer Target 1: 97.3% accurate, 0.8× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_1 := z \cdot \left(b \cdot a + y\right) + \left(x + t \cdot a\right)\\ \mathbf{if}\;z < -11820553527347888000:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_1\\ \mathbf{elif}\;z < 4.7589743188364287 \cdot 10^{-122}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(b \cdot z + t\right) \cdot a + \left(z \cdot y + x\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_1\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_1 (+ (* z (+ (* b a) y)) (+ x (* t a)))))
   (if (< z -11820553527347888000.0)
     t_1
     (if (< z 4.7589743188364287e-122)
       (+ (* (+ (* b z) t) a) (+ (* z y) x))
       t_1))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double t_1 = (z * ((b * a) + y)) + (x + (t * a));
	double tmp;
	if (z < -11820553527347888000.0) {
		tmp = t_1;
	} else if (z < 4.7589743188364287e-122) {
		tmp = (((b * z) + t) * a) + ((z * y) + x);
	} else {
		tmp = t_1;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8) :: t_1
    real(8) :: tmp
    t_1 = (z * ((b * a) + y)) + (x + (t * a))
    if (z < (-11820553527347888000.0d0)) then
        tmp = t_1
    else if (z < 4.7589743188364287d-122) then
        tmp = (((b * z) + t) * a) + ((z * y) + x)
    else
        tmp = t_1
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double t_1 = (z * ((b * a) + y)) + (x + (t * a));
	double tmp;
	if (z < -11820553527347888000.0) {
		tmp = t_1;
	} else if (z < 4.7589743188364287e-122) {
		tmp = (((b * z) + t) * a) + ((z * y) + x);
	} else {
		tmp = t_1;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b):
	t_1 = (z * ((b * a) + y)) + (x + (t * a))
	tmp = 0
	if z < -11820553527347888000.0:
		tmp = t_1
	elif z < 4.7589743188364287e-122:
		tmp = (((b * z) + t) * a) + ((z * y) + x)
	else:
		tmp = t_1
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	t_1 = Float64(Float64(z * Float64(Float64(b * a) + y)) + Float64(x + Float64(t * a)))
	tmp = 0.0
	if (z < -11820553527347888000.0)
		tmp = t_1;
	elseif (z < 4.7589743188364287e-122)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(b * z) + t) * a) + Float64(Float64(z * y) + x));
	else
		tmp = t_1;
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	t_1 = (z * ((b * a) + y)) + (x + (t * a));
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (z < -11820553527347888000.0)
		tmp = t_1;
	elseif (z < 4.7589743188364287e-122)
		tmp = (((b * z) + t) * a) + ((z * y) + x);
	else
		tmp = t_1;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := Block[{t$95$1 = N[(N[(z * N[(N[(b * a), $MachinePrecision] + y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(x + N[(t * a), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, If[Less[z, -11820553527347888000.0], t$95$1, If[Less[z, 4.7589743188364287e-122], N[(N[(N[(N[(b * z), $MachinePrecision] + t), $MachinePrecision] * a), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(z * y), $MachinePrecision] + x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], t$95$1]]]

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2024324 
(FPCore (x y z t a b)
  :name "Graphics.Rasterific.CubicBezier:cachedBezierAt from Rasterific-0.6.1"
  :precision binary64

  :alt
  (! :herbie-platform default (if (< z -11820553527347888000) (+ (* z (+ (* b a) y)) (+ x (* t a))) (if (< z 47589743188364287/1000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000) (+ (* (+ (* b z) t) a) (+ (* z y) x)) (+ (* z (+ (* b a) y)) (+ x (* t a))))))

  (+ (+ (+ x (* y z)) (* t a)) (* (* a z) b)))