Kahan p13 Example 2

Percentage Accurate: 99.9% → 99.9%
Time: 2.0s
Alternatives: 8
Speedup: 1.0×

Specification

?
\[\mathsf{TRUE}\left(\right)\]
\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_1 := 2 - \frac{\frac{2}{t}}{1 + \frac{1}{t}}\\ t_2 := t\_1 \cdot t\_1\\ \frac{1 + t\_2}{2 + t\_2} \end{array} \end{array} \]
(FPCore (t)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_1 (- 2.0 (/ (/ 2.0 t) (+ 1.0 (/ 1.0 t))))) (t_2 (* t_1 t_1)))
   (/ (+ 1.0 t_2) (+ 2.0 t_2))))
double code(double t) {
	double t_1 = 2.0 - ((2.0 / t) / (1.0 + (1.0 / t)));
	double t_2 = t_1 * t_1;
	return (1.0 + t_2) / (2.0 + t_2);
}
real(8) function code(t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: t_1
    real(8) :: t_2
    t_1 = 2.0d0 - ((2.0d0 / t) / (1.0d0 + (1.0d0 / t)))
    t_2 = t_1 * t_1
    code = (1.0d0 + t_2) / (2.0d0 + t_2)
end function
public static double code(double t) {
	double t_1 = 2.0 - ((2.0 / t) / (1.0 + (1.0 / t)));
	double t_2 = t_1 * t_1;
	return (1.0 + t_2) / (2.0 + t_2);
}
def code(t):
	t_1 = 2.0 - ((2.0 / t) / (1.0 + (1.0 / t)))
	t_2 = t_1 * t_1
	return (1.0 + t_2) / (2.0 + t_2)
function code(t)
	t_1 = Float64(2.0 - Float64(Float64(2.0 / t) / Float64(1.0 + Float64(1.0 / t))))
	t_2 = Float64(t_1 * t_1)
	return Float64(Float64(1.0 + t_2) / Float64(2.0 + t_2))
end
function tmp = code(t)
	t_1 = 2.0 - ((2.0 / t) / (1.0 + (1.0 / t)));
	t_2 = t_1 * t_1;
	tmp = (1.0 + t_2) / (2.0 + t_2);
end
code[t_] := Block[{t$95$1 = N[(2.0 - N[(N[(2.0 / t), $MachinePrecision] / N[(1.0 + N[(1.0 / t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, Block[{t$95$2 = N[(t$95$1 * t$95$1), $MachinePrecision]}, N[(N[(1.0 + t$95$2), $MachinePrecision] / N[(2.0 + t$95$2), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]]
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\begin{array}{l}
t_1 := 2 - \frac{\frac{2}{t}}{1 + \frac{1}{t}}\\
t_2 := t\_1 \cdot t\_1\\
\frac{1 + t\_2}{2 + t\_2}
\end{array}
\end{array}

Sampling outcomes in binary64 precision:

Local Percentage Accuracy vs ?

The average percentage accuracy by input value. Horizontal axis shows value of an input variable; the variable is choosen in the title. Vertical axis is accuracy; higher is better. Red represent the original program, while blue represents Herbie's suggestion. These can be toggled with buttons below the plot. The line is an average while dots represent individual samples.

Accuracy vs Speed?

Herbie found 8 alternatives:

AlternativeAccuracySpeedup
The accuracy (vertical axis) and speed (horizontal axis) of each alternatives. Up and to the right is better. The red square shows the initial program, and each blue circle shows an alternative.The line shows the best available speed-accuracy tradeoffs.

Initial Program: 99.9% accurate, 1.0× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_1 := 2 - \frac{\frac{2}{t}}{1 + \frac{1}{t}}\\ t_2 := t\_1 \cdot t\_1\\ \frac{1 + t\_2}{2 + t\_2} \end{array} \end{array} \]
(FPCore (t)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_1 (- 2.0 (/ (/ 2.0 t) (+ 1.0 (/ 1.0 t))))) (t_2 (* t_1 t_1)))
   (/ (+ 1.0 t_2) (+ 2.0 t_2))))
double code(double t) {
	double t_1 = 2.0 - ((2.0 / t) / (1.0 + (1.0 / t)));
	double t_2 = t_1 * t_1;
	return (1.0 + t_2) / (2.0 + t_2);
}
real(8) function code(t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: t_1
    real(8) :: t_2
    t_1 = 2.0d0 - ((2.0d0 / t) / (1.0d0 + (1.0d0 / t)))
    t_2 = t_1 * t_1
    code = (1.0d0 + t_2) / (2.0d0 + t_2)
end function
public static double code(double t) {
	double t_1 = 2.0 - ((2.0 / t) / (1.0 + (1.0 / t)));
	double t_2 = t_1 * t_1;
	return (1.0 + t_2) / (2.0 + t_2);
}
def code(t):
	t_1 = 2.0 - ((2.0 / t) / (1.0 + (1.0 / t)))
	t_2 = t_1 * t_1
	return (1.0 + t_2) / (2.0 + t_2)
function code(t)
	t_1 = Float64(2.0 - Float64(Float64(2.0 / t) / Float64(1.0 + Float64(1.0 / t))))
	t_2 = Float64(t_1 * t_1)
	return Float64(Float64(1.0 + t_2) / Float64(2.0 + t_2))
end
function tmp = code(t)
	t_1 = 2.0 - ((2.0 / t) / (1.0 + (1.0 / t)));
	t_2 = t_1 * t_1;
	tmp = (1.0 + t_2) / (2.0 + t_2);
end
code[t_] := Block[{t$95$1 = N[(2.0 - N[(N[(2.0 / t), $MachinePrecision] / N[(1.0 + N[(1.0 / t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, Block[{t$95$2 = N[(t$95$1 * t$95$1), $MachinePrecision]}, N[(N[(1.0 + t$95$2), $MachinePrecision] / N[(2.0 + t$95$2), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]]
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\begin{array}{l}
t_1 := 2 - \frac{\frac{2}{t}}{1 + \frac{1}{t}}\\
t_2 := t\_1 \cdot t\_1\\
\frac{1 + t\_2}{2 + t\_2}
\end{array}
\end{array}

Alternative 1: 99.9% accurate, 1.0× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_1 := 2 - \frac{\frac{2}{t}}{1 + \frac{1}{t}}\\ t_2 := t\_1 \cdot t\_1\\ \frac{1 + t\_2}{2 + t\_2} \end{array} \end{array} \]
(FPCore (t)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_1 (- 2.0 (/ (/ 2.0 t) (+ 1.0 (/ 1.0 t))))) (t_2 (* t_1 t_1)))
   (/ (+ 1.0 t_2) (+ 2.0 t_2))))
double code(double t) {
	double t_1 = 2.0 - ((2.0 / t) / (1.0 + (1.0 / t)));
	double t_2 = t_1 * t_1;
	return (1.0 + t_2) / (2.0 + t_2);
}
real(8) function code(t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: t_1
    real(8) :: t_2
    t_1 = 2.0d0 - ((2.0d0 / t) / (1.0d0 + (1.0d0 / t)))
    t_2 = t_1 * t_1
    code = (1.0d0 + t_2) / (2.0d0 + t_2)
end function
public static double code(double t) {
	double t_1 = 2.0 - ((2.0 / t) / (1.0 + (1.0 / t)));
	double t_2 = t_1 * t_1;
	return (1.0 + t_2) / (2.0 + t_2);
}
def code(t):
	t_1 = 2.0 - ((2.0 / t) / (1.0 + (1.0 / t)))
	t_2 = t_1 * t_1
	return (1.0 + t_2) / (2.0 + t_2)
function code(t)
	t_1 = Float64(2.0 - Float64(Float64(2.0 / t) / Float64(1.0 + Float64(1.0 / t))))
	t_2 = Float64(t_1 * t_1)
	return Float64(Float64(1.0 + t_2) / Float64(2.0 + t_2))
end
function tmp = code(t)
	t_1 = 2.0 - ((2.0 / t) / (1.0 + (1.0 / t)));
	t_2 = t_1 * t_1;
	tmp = (1.0 + t_2) / (2.0 + t_2);
end
code[t_] := Block[{t$95$1 = N[(2.0 - N[(N[(2.0 / t), $MachinePrecision] / N[(1.0 + N[(1.0 / t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, Block[{t$95$2 = N[(t$95$1 * t$95$1), $MachinePrecision]}, N[(N[(1.0 + t$95$2), $MachinePrecision] / N[(2.0 + t$95$2), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]]
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\begin{array}{l}
t_1 := 2 - \frac{\frac{2}{t}}{1 + \frac{1}{t}}\\
t_2 := t\_1 \cdot t\_1\\
\frac{1 + t\_2}{2 + t\_2}
\end{array}
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Initial program 100.0%

    \[\frac{1 + \left(2 - \frac{\frac{2}{t}}{1 + \frac{1}{t}}\right) \cdot \left(2 - \frac{\frac{2}{t}}{1 + \frac{1}{t}}\right)}{2 + \left(2 - \frac{\frac{2}{t}}{1 + \frac{1}{t}}\right) \cdot \left(2 - \frac{\frac{2}{t}}{1 + \frac{1}{t}}\right)} \]
  2. Add Preprocessing
  3. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 2: 60.0% accurate, 1.2× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_1 := 1 + \frac{1}{t}\\ t_2 := \frac{\frac{2}{t}}{t\_1}\\ \mathbf{if}\;t\_2 \leq 0.1:\\ \;\;\;\;1 + \left(2 - \left(2 - t\_2\right) \cdot t\_1\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{t\_2}{2 + \left(2 - \frac{t\_2}{t\_1}\right)}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]
(FPCore (t)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_1 (+ 1.0 (/ 1.0 t))) (t_2 (/ (/ 2.0 t) t_1)))
   (if (<= t_2 0.1)
     (+ 1.0 (- 2.0 (* (- 2.0 t_2) t_1)))
     (/ t_2 (+ 2.0 (- 2.0 (/ t_2 t_1)))))))
double code(double t) {
	double t_1 = 1.0 + (1.0 / t);
	double t_2 = (2.0 / t) / t_1;
	double tmp;
	if (t_2 <= 0.1) {
		tmp = 1.0 + (2.0 - ((2.0 - t_2) * t_1));
	} else {
		tmp = t_2 / (2.0 + (2.0 - (t_2 / t_1)));
	}
	return tmp;
}
real(8) function code(t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: t_1
    real(8) :: t_2
    real(8) :: tmp
    t_1 = 1.0d0 + (1.0d0 / t)
    t_2 = (2.0d0 / t) / t_1
    if (t_2 <= 0.1d0) then
        tmp = 1.0d0 + (2.0d0 - ((2.0d0 - t_2) * t_1))
    else
        tmp = t_2 / (2.0d0 + (2.0d0 - (t_2 / t_1)))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function
public static double code(double t) {
	double t_1 = 1.0 + (1.0 / t);
	double t_2 = (2.0 / t) / t_1;
	double tmp;
	if (t_2 <= 0.1) {
		tmp = 1.0 + (2.0 - ((2.0 - t_2) * t_1));
	} else {
		tmp = t_2 / (2.0 + (2.0 - (t_2 / t_1)));
	}
	return tmp;
}
def code(t):
	t_1 = 1.0 + (1.0 / t)
	t_2 = (2.0 / t) / t_1
	tmp = 0
	if t_2 <= 0.1:
		tmp = 1.0 + (2.0 - ((2.0 - t_2) * t_1))
	else:
		tmp = t_2 / (2.0 + (2.0 - (t_2 / t_1)))
	return tmp
function code(t)
	t_1 = Float64(1.0 + Float64(1.0 / t))
	t_2 = Float64(Float64(2.0 / t) / t_1)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (t_2 <= 0.1)
		tmp = Float64(1.0 + Float64(2.0 - Float64(Float64(2.0 - t_2) * t_1)));
	else
		tmp = Float64(t_2 / Float64(2.0 + Float64(2.0 - Float64(t_2 / t_1))));
	end
	return tmp
end
function tmp_2 = code(t)
	t_1 = 1.0 + (1.0 / t);
	t_2 = (2.0 / t) / t_1;
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (t_2 <= 0.1)
		tmp = 1.0 + (2.0 - ((2.0 - t_2) * t_1));
	else
		tmp = t_2 / (2.0 + (2.0 - (t_2 / t_1)));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end
code[t_] := Block[{t$95$1 = N[(1.0 + N[(1.0 / t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, Block[{t$95$2 = N[(N[(2.0 / t), $MachinePrecision] / t$95$1), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[t$95$2, 0.1], N[(1.0 + N[(2.0 - N[(N[(2.0 - t$95$2), $MachinePrecision] * t$95$1), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(t$95$2 / N[(2.0 + N[(2.0 - N[(t$95$2 / t$95$1), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]]]
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\begin{array}{l}
t_1 := 1 + \frac{1}{t}\\
t_2 := \frac{\frac{2}{t}}{t\_1}\\
\mathbf{if}\;t\_2 \leq 0.1:\\
\;\;\;\;1 + \left(2 - \left(2 - t\_2\right) \cdot t\_1\right)\\

\mathbf{else}:\\
\;\;\;\;\frac{t\_2}{2 + \left(2 - \frac{t\_2}{t\_1}\right)}\\


\end{array}
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Split input into 2 regimes
  2. if (/.f64 (/.f64 #s(literal 2 binary64) t) (+.f64 #s(literal 1 binary64) (/.f64 #s(literal 1 binary64) t))) < 0.10000000000000001

    1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\frac{1 + \left(2 - \frac{\frac{2}{t}}{1 + \frac{1}{t}}\right) \cdot \left(2 - \frac{\frac{2}{t}}{1 + \frac{1}{t}}\right)}{2 + \left(2 - \frac{\frac{2}{t}}{1 + \frac{1}{t}}\right) \cdot \left(2 - \frac{\frac{2}{t}}{1 + \frac{1}{t}}\right)} \]
    2. Add Preprocessing
    3. Taylor expanded in t around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1}{2} + {t}^{2}} \]
    4. Applied rewrites16.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{1 + \left(2 - \frac{\frac{2}{t}}{1 + \frac{1}{t}}\right) \cdot \left(2 - \frac{\frac{2}{t}}{1 + \frac{1}{t}}\right)} \]
    5. Taylor expanded in t around 0

      \[\leadsto 1 + {t}^{2} \cdot \color{blue}{\left(4 + t \cdot \left(12 \cdot t - 8\right)\right)} \]
    6. Applied rewrites17.4%

      \[\leadsto 1 + \left(2 - \color{blue}{\frac{\frac{2}{t}}{1 + \frac{1}{t}}}\right) \]
    7. Taylor expanded in t around 0

      \[\leadsto 1 + \left(2 - \left(2 + -2 \cdot t\right)\right) \]
    8. Applied rewrites21.2%

      \[\leadsto 1 + \left(2 - \left(2 - \frac{\frac{2}{t}}{1 + \frac{1}{t}}\right) \cdot \left(1 + \frac{1}{\color{blue}{t}}\right)\right) \]

    if 0.10000000000000001 < (/.f64 (/.f64 #s(literal 2 binary64) t) (+.f64 #s(literal 1 binary64) (/.f64 #s(literal 1 binary64) t)))

    1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\frac{1 + \left(2 - \frac{\frac{2}{t}}{1 + \frac{1}{t}}\right) \cdot \left(2 - \frac{\frac{2}{t}}{1 + \frac{1}{t}}\right)}{2 + \left(2 - \frac{\frac{2}{t}}{1 + \frac{1}{t}}\right) \cdot \left(2 - \frac{\frac{2}{t}}{1 + \frac{1}{t}}\right)} \]
    2. Add Preprocessing
    3. Taylor expanded in t around 0

      \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{1}}{2 + \left(2 - \frac{\frac{2}{t}}{1 + \frac{1}{t}}\right) \cdot \left(2 - \frac{\frac{2}{t}}{1 + \frac{1}{t}}\right)} \]
    4. Applied rewrites18.7%

      \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{\frac{\frac{2}{t}}{1 + \frac{1}{t}}}}{2 + \left(2 - \frac{\frac{2}{t}}{1 + \frac{1}{t}}\right) \cdot \left(2 - \frac{\frac{2}{t}}{1 + \frac{1}{t}}\right)} \]
    5. Taylor expanded in t around 0

      \[\leadsto \frac{\frac{\frac{2}{t}}{1 + \frac{1}{t}}}{2 + \color{blue}{{t}^{2} \cdot \left(4 + t \cdot \left(12 \cdot t - 8\right)\right)}} \]
    6. Applied rewrites18.7%

      \[\leadsto \frac{\frac{\frac{2}{t}}{1 + \frac{1}{t}}}{2 + \color{blue}{\left(2 - \frac{\frac{2}{t}}{1 + \frac{1}{t}}\right)}} \]
    7. Taylor expanded in t around 0

      \[\leadsto \frac{\frac{\frac{2}{t}}{1 + \frac{1}{t}}}{2 + \left(2 - \left(2 + -2 \cdot \color{blue}{t}\right)\right)} \]
    8. Applied rewrites96.9%

      \[\leadsto \frac{\frac{\frac{2}{t}}{1 + \frac{1}{t}}}{2 + \left(2 - \frac{\frac{\frac{2}{t}}{1 + \frac{1}{t}}}{1 + \color{blue}{\frac{1}{t}}}\right)} \]
  3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
  4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 3: 19.9% accurate, 2.2× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_1 := \frac{\frac{2}{t}}{1 + \frac{1}{t}}\\ 1 + \left(2 - t\_1\right) \cdot t\_1 \end{array} \end{array} \]
(FPCore (t)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_1 (/ (/ 2.0 t) (+ 1.0 (/ 1.0 t))))) (+ 1.0 (* (- 2.0 t_1) t_1))))
double code(double t) {
	double t_1 = (2.0 / t) / (1.0 + (1.0 / t));
	return 1.0 + ((2.0 - t_1) * t_1);
}
real(8) function code(t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: t_1
    t_1 = (2.0d0 / t) / (1.0d0 + (1.0d0 / t))
    code = 1.0d0 + ((2.0d0 - t_1) * t_1)
end function
public static double code(double t) {
	double t_1 = (2.0 / t) / (1.0 + (1.0 / t));
	return 1.0 + ((2.0 - t_1) * t_1);
}
def code(t):
	t_1 = (2.0 / t) / (1.0 + (1.0 / t))
	return 1.0 + ((2.0 - t_1) * t_1)
function code(t)
	t_1 = Float64(Float64(2.0 / t) / Float64(1.0 + Float64(1.0 / t)))
	return Float64(1.0 + Float64(Float64(2.0 - t_1) * t_1))
end
function tmp = code(t)
	t_1 = (2.0 / t) / (1.0 + (1.0 / t));
	tmp = 1.0 + ((2.0 - t_1) * t_1);
end
code[t_] := Block[{t$95$1 = N[(N[(2.0 / t), $MachinePrecision] / N[(1.0 + N[(1.0 / t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, N[(1.0 + N[(N[(2.0 - t$95$1), $MachinePrecision] * t$95$1), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\begin{array}{l}
t_1 := \frac{\frac{2}{t}}{1 + \frac{1}{t}}\\
1 + \left(2 - t\_1\right) \cdot t\_1
\end{array}
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Initial program 100.0%

    \[\frac{1 + \left(2 - \frac{\frac{2}{t}}{1 + \frac{1}{t}}\right) \cdot \left(2 - \frac{\frac{2}{t}}{1 + \frac{1}{t}}\right)}{2 + \left(2 - \frac{\frac{2}{t}}{1 + \frac{1}{t}}\right) \cdot \left(2 - \frac{\frac{2}{t}}{1 + \frac{1}{t}}\right)} \]
  2. Add Preprocessing
  3. Taylor expanded in t around 0

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1}{2} + {t}^{2}} \]
  4. Applied rewrites17.7%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{1 + \left(2 - \frac{\frac{2}{t}}{1 + \frac{1}{t}}\right) \cdot \left(2 - \frac{\frac{2}{t}}{1 + \frac{1}{t}}\right)} \]
  5. Taylor expanded in t around 0

    \[\leadsto 1 + \left(2 - \frac{\frac{2}{t}}{1 + \frac{1}{t}}\right) \cdot \left(t \cdot \color{blue}{\left(2 + -2 \cdot t\right)}\right) \]
  6. Applied rewrites20.0%

    \[\leadsto 1 + \left(2 - \frac{\frac{2}{t}}{1 + \frac{1}{t}}\right) \cdot \frac{\frac{2}{t}}{\color{blue}{1 + \frac{1}{t}}} \]
  7. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 4: 19.2% accurate, 2.2× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_1 := 1 + \frac{1}{t}\\ t_2 := \frac{\frac{2}{t}}{t\_1}\\ \mathbf{if}\;2 - t\_2 \leq 0.002:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_2\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_1\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]
(FPCore (t)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_1 (+ 1.0 (/ 1.0 t))) (t_2 (/ (/ 2.0 t) t_1)))
   (if (<= (- 2.0 t_2) 0.002) t_2 t_1)))
double code(double t) {
	double t_1 = 1.0 + (1.0 / t);
	double t_2 = (2.0 / t) / t_1;
	double tmp;
	if ((2.0 - t_2) <= 0.002) {
		tmp = t_2;
	} else {
		tmp = t_1;
	}
	return tmp;
}
real(8) function code(t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: t_1
    real(8) :: t_2
    real(8) :: tmp
    t_1 = 1.0d0 + (1.0d0 / t)
    t_2 = (2.0d0 / t) / t_1
    if ((2.0d0 - t_2) <= 0.002d0) then
        tmp = t_2
    else
        tmp = t_1
    end if
    code = tmp
end function
public static double code(double t) {
	double t_1 = 1.0 + (1.0 / t);
	double t_2 = (2.0 / t) / t_1;
	double tmp;
	if ((2.0 - t_2) <= 0.002) {
		tmp = t_2;
	} else {
		tmp = t_1;
	}
	return tmp;
}
def code(t):
	t_1 = 1.0 + (1.0 / t)
	t_2 = (2.0 / t) / t_1
	tmp = 0
	if (2.0 - t_2) <= 0.002:
		tmp = t_2
	else:
		tmp = t_1
	return tmp
function code(t)
	t_1 = Float64(1.0 + Float64(1.0 / t))
	t_2 = Float64(Float64(2.0 / t) / t_1)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (Float64(2.0 - t_2) <= 0.002)
		tmp = t_2;
	else
		tmp = t_1;
	end
	return tmp
end
function tmp_2 = code(t)
	t_1 = 1.0 + (1.0 / t);
	t_2 = (2.0 / t) / t_1;
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((2.0 - t_2) <= 0.002)
		tmp = t_2;
	else
		tmp = t_1;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end
code[t_] := Block[{t$95$1 = N[(1.0 + N[(1.0 / t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, Block[{t$95$2 = N[(N[(2.0 / t), $MachinePrecision] / t$95$1), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[N[(2.0 - t$95$2), $MachinePrecision], 0.002], t$95$2, t$95$1]]]
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\begin{array}{l}
t_1 := 1 + \frac{1}{t}\\
t_2 := \frac{\frac{2}{t}}{t\_1}\\
\mathbf{if}\;2 - t\_2 \leq 0.002:\\
\;\;\;\;t\_2\\

\mathbf{else}:\\
\;\;\;\;t\_1\\


\end{array}
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Split input into 2 regimes
  2. if (-.f64 #s(literal 2 binary64) (/.f64 (/.f64 #s(literal 2 binary64) t) (+.f64 #s(literal 1 binary64) (/.f64 #s(literal 1 binary64) t)))) < 2e-3

    1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\frac{1 + \left(2 - \frac{\frac{2}{t}}{1 + \frac{1}{t}}\right) \cdot \left(2 - \frac{\frac{2}{t}}{1 + \frac{1}{t}}\right)}{2 + \left(2 - \frac{\frac{2}{t}}{1 + \frac{1}{t}}\right) \cdot \left(2 - \frac{\frac{2}{t}}{1 + \frac{1}{t}}\right)} \]
    2. Add Preprocessing
    3. Taylor expanded in t around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1}{2} + {t}^{2} \cdot \left(1 + -2 \cdot t\right)} \]
    4. Applied rewrites3.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(2 - \frac{\frac{2}{t}}{1 + \frac{1}{t}}\right) \cdot \left(2 - \frac{\frac{2}{t}}{1 + \frac{1}{t}}\right)} \]
    5. Taylor expanded in t around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1}{2} + {t}^{2} \cdot \left(1 + t \cdot \left(t - 2\right)\right)} \]
    6. Applied rewrites17.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{\frac{2}{t}}{1 + \frac{1}{t}}} \]

    if 2e-3 < (-.f64 #s(literal 2 binary64) (/.f64 (/.f64 #s(literal 2 binary64) t) (+.f64 #s(literal 1 binary64) (/.f64 #s(literal 1 binary64) t))))

    1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\frac{1 + \left(2 - \frac{\frac{2}{t}}{1 + \frac{1}{t}}\right) \cdot \left(2 - \frac{\frac{2}{t}}{1 + \frac{1}{t}}\right)}{2 + \left(2 - \frac{\frac{2}{t}}{1 + \frac{1}{t}}\right) \cdot \left(2 - \frac{\frac{2}{t}}{1 + \frac{1}{t}}\right)} \]
    2. Add Preprocessing
    3. Taylor expanded in t around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1}{2} + {t}^{2} \cdot \left(1 + t \cdot \left(t - 2\right)\right)} \]
    4. Applied rewrites18.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 - \frac{\frac{2}{t}}{1 + \frac{1}{t}}} \]
    5. Taylor expanded in t around 0

      \[\leadsto t \cdot \color{blue}{\left(2 + t \cdot \left(2 \cdot t - 2\right)\right)} \]
    6. Applied rewrites21.2%

      \[\leadsto 1 + \color{blue}{\frac{1}{t}} \]
  3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
  4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 5: 19.0% accurate, 2.8× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_1 := 1 + \frac{1}{t}\\ 1 + \left(2 - \left(2 - \frac{\frac{2}{t}}{t\_1}\right) \cdot t\_1\right) \end{array} \end{array} \]
(FPCore (t)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_1 (+ 1.0 (/ 1.0 t))))
   (+ 1.0 (- 2.0 (* (- 2.0 (/ (/ 2.0 t) t_1)) t_1)))))
double code(double t) {
	double t_1 = 1.0 + (1.0 / t);
	return 1.0 + (2.0 - ((2.0 - ((2.0 / t) / t_1)) * t_1));
}
real(8) function code(t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: t_1
    t_1 = 1.0d0 + (1.0d0 / t)
    code = 1.0d0 + (2.0d0 - ((2.0d0 - ((2.0d0 / t) / t_1)) * t_1))
end function
public static double code(double t) {
	double t_1 = 1.0 + (1.0 / t);
	return 1.0 + (2.0 - ((2.0 - ((2.0 / t) / t_1)) * t_1));
}
def code(t):
	t_1 = 1.0 + (1.0 / t)
	return 1.0 + (2.0 - ((2.0 - ((2.0 / t) / t_1)) * t_1))
function code(t)
	t_1 = Float64(1.0 + Float64(1.0 / t))
	return Float64(1.0 + Float64(2.0 - Float64(Float64(2.0 - Float64(Float64(2.0 / t) / t_1)) * t_1)))
end
function tmp = code(t)
	t_1 = 1.0 + (1.0 / t);
	tmp = 1.0 + (2.0 - ((2.0 - ((2.0 / t) / t_1)) * t_1));
end
code[t_] := Block[{t$95$1 = N[(1.0 + N[(1.0 / t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, N[(1.0 + N[(2.0 - N[(N[(2.0 - N[(N[(2.0 / t), $MachinePrecision] / t$95$1), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] * t$95$1), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\begin{array}{l}
t_1 := 1 + \frac{1}{t}\\
1 + \left(2 - \left(2 - \frac{\frac{2}{t}}{t\_1}\right) \cdot t\_1\right)
\end{array}
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Initial program 100.0%

    \[\frac{1 + \left(2 - \frac{\frac{2}{t}}{1 + \frac{1}{t}}\right) \cdot \left(2 - \frac{\frac{2}{t}}{1 + \frac{1}{t}}\right)}{2 + \left(2 - \frac{\frac{2}{t}}{1 + \frac{1}{t}}\right) \cdot \left(2 - \frac{\frac{2}{t}}{1 + \frac{1}{t}}\right)} \]
  2. Add Preprocessing
  3. Taylor expanded in t around 0

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1}{2} + {t}^{2}} \]
  4. Applied rewrites17.7%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{1 + \left(2 - \frac{\frac{2}{t}}{1 + \frac{1}{t}}\right) \cdot \left(2 - \frac{\frac{2}{t}}{1 + \frac{1}{t}}\right)} \]
  5. Taylor expanded in t around 0

    \[\leadsto 1 + {t}^{2} \cdot \color{blue}{\left(4 + t \cdot \left(12 \cdot t - 8\right)\right)} \]
  6. Applied rewrites18.1%

    \[\leadsto 1 + \left(2 - \color{blue}{\frac{\frac{2}{t}}{1 + \frac{1}{t}}}\right) \]
  7. Taylor expanded in t around 0

    \[\leadsto 1 + \left(2 - \left(2 + -2 \cdot t\right)\right) \]
  8. Applied rewrites19.0%

    \[\leadsto 1 + \left(2 - \left(2 - \frac{\frac{2}{t}}{1 + \frac{1}{t}}\right) \cdot \left(1 + \frac{1}{\color{blue}{t}}\right)\right) \]
  9. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 6: 18.9% accurate, 4.6× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ 1 + \frac{\frac{2}{t}}{1 + \frac{1}{t}} \end{array} \]
(FPCore (t) :precision binary64 (+ 1.0 (/ (/ 2.0 t) (+ 1.0 (/ 1.0 t)))))
double code(double t) {
	return 1.0 + ((2.0 / t) / (1.0 + (1.0 / t)));
}
real(8) function code(t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = 1.0d0 + ((2.0d0 / t) / (1.0d0 + (1.0d0 / t)))
end function
public static double code(double t) {
	return 1.0 + ((2.0 / t) / (1.0 + (1.0 / t)));
}
def code(t):
	return 1.0 + ((2.0 / t) / (1.0 + (1.0 / t)))
function code(t)
	return Float64(1.0 + Float64(Float64(2.0 / t) / Float64(1.0 + Float64(1.0 / t))))
end
function tmp = code(t)
	tmp = 1.0 + ((2.0 / t) / (1.0 + (1.0 / t)));
end
code[t_] := N[(1.0 + N[(N[(2.0 / t), $MachinePrecision] / N[(1.0 + N[(1.0 / t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]
\begin{array}{l}

\\
1 + \frac{\frac{2}{t}}{1 + \frac{1}{t}}
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Initial program 100.0%

    \[\frac{1 + \left(2 - \frac{\frac{2}{t}}{1 + \frac{1}{t}}\right) \cdot \left(2 - \frac{\frac{2}{t}}{1 + \frac{1}{t}}\right)}{2 + \left(2 - \frac{\frac{2}{t}}{1 + \frac{1}{t}}\right) \cdot \left(2 - \frac{\frac{2}{t}}{1 + \frac{1}{t}}\right)} \]
  2. Add Preprocessing
  3. Taylor expanded in t around 0

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1}{2} + {t}^{2}} \]
  4. Applied rewrites17.7%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{1 + \left(2 - \frac{\frac{2}{t}}{1 + \frac{1}{t}}\right) \cdot \left(2 - \frac{\frac{2}{t}}{1 + \frac{1}{t}}\right)} \]
  5. Taylor expanded in t around 0

    \[\leadsto 1 + {t}^{2} \cdot \color{blue}{\left(4 + t \cdot \left(12 \cdot t - 8\right)\right)} \]
  6. Applied rewrites18.1%

    \[\leadsto 1 + \left(2 - \color{blue}{\frac{\frac{2}{t}}{1 + \frac{1}{t}}}\right) \]
  7. Taylor expanded in t around 0

    \[\leadsto 1 + t \cdot \left(2 + t \cdot \color{blue}{\left(t \cdot \left(2 + -2 \cdot t\right) - 2\right)}\right) \]
  8. Applied rewrites19.0%

    \[\leadsto 1 + \frac{\frac{2}{t}}{1 + \frac{1}{\color{blue}{t}}} \]
  9. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 7: 12.1% accurate, 12.3× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ 1 + \frac{1}{t} \end{array} \]
(FPCore (t) :precision binary64 (+ 1.0 (/ 1.0 t)))
double code(double t) {
	return 1.0 + (1.0 / t);
}
real(8) function code(t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = 1.0d0 + (1.0d0 / t)
end function
public static double code(double t) {
	return 1.0 + (1.0 / t);
}
def code(t):
	return 1.0 + (1.0 / t)
function code(t)
	return Float64(1.0 + Float64(1.0 / t))
end
function tmp = code(t)
	tmp = 1.0 + (1.0 / t);
end
code[t_] := N[(1.0 + N[(1.0 / t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]
\begin{array}{l}

\\
1 + \frac{1}{t}
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Initial program 100.0%

    \[\frac{1 + \left(2 - \frac{\frac{2}{t}}{1 + \frac{1}{t}}\right) \cdot \left(2 - \frac{\frac{2}{t}}{1 + \frac{1}{t}}\right)}{2 + \left(2 - \frac{\frac{2}{t}}{1 + \frac{1}{t}}\right) \cdot \left(2 - \frac{\frac{2}{t}}{1 + \frac{1}{t}}\right)} \]
  2. Add Preprocessing
  3. Taylor expanded in t around 0

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1}{2} + {t}^{2} \cdot \left(1 + t \cdot \left(t - 2\right)\right)} \]
  4. Applied rewrites10.9%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 - \frac{\frac{2}{t}}{1 + \frac{1}{t}}} \]
  5. Taylor expanded in t around 0

    \[\leadsto t \cdot \color{blue}{\left(2 + t \cdot \left(2 \cdot t - 2\right)\right)} \]
  6. Applied rewrites12.4%

    \[\leadsto 1 + \color{blue}{\frac{1}{t}} \]
  7. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 8: 3.5% accurate, 15.3× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \frac{2}{t} \end{array} \]
(FPCore (t) :precision binary64 (/ 2.0 t))
double code(double t) {
	return 2.0 / t;
}
real(8) function code(t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = 2.0d0 / t
end function
public static double code(double t) {
	return 2.0 / t;
}
def code(t):
	return 2.0 / t
function code(t)
	return Float64(2.0 / t)
end
function tmp = code(t)
	tmp = 2.0 / t;
end
code[t_] := N[(2.0 / t), $MachinePrecision]
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\frac{2}{t}
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Initial program 100.0%

    \[\frac{1 + \left(2 - \frac{\frac{2}{t}}{1 + \frac{1}{t}}\right) \cdot \left(2 - \frac{\frac{2}{t}}{1 + \frac{1}{t}}\right)}{2 + \left(2 - \frac{\frac{2}{t}}{1 + \frac{1}{t}}\right) \cdot \left(2 - \frac{\frac{2}{t}}{1 + \frac{1}{t}}\right)} \]
  2. Add Preprocessing
  3. Taylor expanded in t around 0

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1}{2} + {t}^{2} \cdot \left(1 + -2 \cdot t\right)} \]
  4. Applied rewrites10.4%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(2 - \frac{\frac{2}{t}}{1 + \frac{1}{t}}\right) \cdot \left(2 - \frac{\frac{2}{t}}{1 + \frac{1}{t}}\right)} \]
  5. Taylor expanded in t around 0

    \[\leadsto {t}^{2} \cdot \color{blue}{\left(4 + t \cdot \left(t \cdot \left(12 + -16 \cdot t\right) - 8\right)\right)} \]
  6. Applied rewrites3.6%

    \[\leadsto \frac{2}{\color{blue}{t}} \]
  7. Add Preprocessing

Reproduce

?
herbie shell --seed 2024321 
(FPCore (t)
  :name "Kahan p13 Example 2"
  :precision binary64
  :pre (TRUE)
  (/ (+ 1.0 (* (- 2.0 (/ (/ 2.0 t) (+ 1.0 (/ 1.0 t)))) (- 2.0 (/ (/ 2.0 t) (+ 1.0 (/ 1.0 t)))))) (+ 2.0 (* (- 2.0 (/ (/ 2.0 t) (+ 1.0 (/ 1.0 t)))) (- 2.0 (/ (/ 2.0 t) (+ 1.0 (/ 1.0 t))))))))