Graphics.Rendering.Plot.Render.Plot.Legend:renderLegendOutside from plot-0.2.3.4, C

Percentage Accurate: 99.9% → 99.9%

Time: 970.0ms

Alternatives: 4

Speedup: 1.0×

• 20.7% of points produce a very large (infinite) output. You may want to add a precondition.

Specification

\[\mathsf{TRUE}\left(\right)\]

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x \cdot \left(y + z\right) + z \cdot 5 \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (+ (* x (+ y z)) (* z 5.0)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (x * (y + z)) + (z * 5.0);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = (x * (y + z)) + (z * 5.0d0)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (x * (y + z)) + (z * 5.0);
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return (x * (y + z)) + (z * 5.0)

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(Float64(x * Float64(y + z)) + Float64(z * 5.0))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = (x * (y + z)) + (z * 5.0);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(N[(x * N[(y + z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * 5.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Initial Program: 99.9% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x \cdot \left(y + z\right) + z \cdot 5 \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (+ (* x (+ y z)) (* z 5.0)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (x * (y + z)) + (z * 5.0);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = (x * (y + z)) + (z * 5.0d0)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (x * (y + z)) + (z * 5.0);
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return (x * (y + z)) + (z * 5.0)

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(Float64(x * Float64(y + z)) + Float64(z * 5.0))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = (x * (y + z)) + (z * 5.0);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(N[(x * N[(y + z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * 5.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Alternative 1: 99.9% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x \cdot \left(y + z\right) + z \cdot 5 \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (+ (* x (+ y z)) (* z 5.0)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (x * (y + z)) + (z * 5.0);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = (x * (y + z)) + (z * 5.0d0)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (x * (y + z)) + (z * 5.0);
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return (x * (y + z)) + (z * 5.0)

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(Float64(x * Float64(y + z)) + Float64(z * 5.0))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = (x * (y + z)) + (z * 5.0);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(N[(x * N[(y + z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * 5.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 99.9%

   \[x \cdot \left(y + z\right) + z \cdot 5 \]
2. Add Preprocessing
3. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 2: 83.8% accurate, 0.8× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_0 := x \cdot \left(y + z\right)\\ \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -8.5 \cdot 10^{-96}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_0\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \leq 5.1 \cdot 10^{-49}:\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot 5\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_0\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_0 (* x (+ y z))))
   (if (<= x -8.5e-96) t_0 (if (<= x 5.1e-49) (* z 5.0) t_0))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double t_0 = x * (y + z);
	double tmp;
	if (x <= -8.5e-96) {
		tmp = t_0;
	} else if (x <= 5.1e-49) {
		tmp = z * 5.0;
	} else {
		tmp = t_0;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: t_0
    real(8) :: tmp
    t_0 = x * (y + z)
    if (x <= (-8.5d-96)) then
        tmp = t_0
    else if (x <= 5.1d-49) then
        tmp = z * 5.0d0
    else
        tmp = t_0
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double t_0 = x * (y + z);
	double tmp;
	if (x <= -8.5e-96) {
		tmp = t_0;
	} else if (x <= 5.1e-49) {
		tmp = z * 5.0;
	} else {
		tmp = t_0;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	t_0 = x * (y + z)
	tmp = 0
	if x <= -8.5e-96:
		tmp = t_0
	elif x <= 5.1e-49:
		tmp = z * 5.0
	else:
		tmp = t_0
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	t_0 = Float64(x * Float64(y + z))
	tmp = 0.0
	if (x <= -8.5e-96)
		tmp = t_0;
	elseif (x <= 5.1e-49)
		tmp = Float64(z * 5.0);
	else
		tmp = t_0;
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	t_0 = x * (y + z);
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (x <= -8.5e-96)
		tmp = t_0;
	elseif (x <= 5.1e-49)
		tmp = z * 5.0;
	else
		tmp = t_0;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := Block[{t$95$0 = N[(x * N[(y + z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[x, -8.5e-96], t$95$0, If[LessEqual[x, 5.1e-49], N[(z * 5.0), $MachinePrecision], t$95$0]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if x < -8.49999999999999983e-96 or 5.10000000000000026e-49 < x

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[x \cdot \left(y + z\right) + z \cdot 5 \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{5 \cdot z + x \cdot \left(y + z\right)} \]

   5. Applied rewrites 91.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(y + z\right)} \]

   if -8.49999999999999983e-96 < x < 5.10000000000000026e-49

   1. Initial program 99.8%

      \[x \cdot \left(y + z\right) + z \cdot 5 \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around inf

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(y + \left(z + 5 \cdot \frac{z}{x}\right)\right)} \]

   5. Applied rewrites 83.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot 5} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 3: 36.8% accurate, 2.8× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ z \cdot 5 \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (* z 5.0))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return z * 5.0;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = z * 5.0d0
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return z * 5.0;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return z * 5.0

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(z * 5.0)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = z * 5.0;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(z * 5.0), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 99.9%

   \[x \cdot \left(y + z\right) + z \cdot 5 \]
2. Add Preprocessing

3. Taylor expanded in x around inf

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(y + \left(z + 5 \cdot \frac{z}{x}\right)\right)} \]

5. Applied rewrites 35.6%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot 5} \]
6. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 4: 7.1% accurate, 4.3× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ y + z \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (+ y z))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return y + z;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = y + z
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return y + z;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return y + z

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(y + z)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = y + z;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(y + z), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 99.9%

   \[x \cdot \left(y + z\right) + z \cdot 5 \]
2. Add Preprocessing

3. Taylor expanded in x around 0

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{5 \cdot z + x \cdot \left(y + z\right)} \]

5. Applied rewrites 65.7%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(y + z\right)} \]

6. Taylor expanded in x around 0

   \[\leadsto x \cdot \color{blue}{\left(y + z\right)} \]

8. Applied rewrites 6.7%

   \[\leadsto y + \color{blue}{z} \]
9. Add Preprocessing

Developer Target 1: 97.9% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(x + 5\right) \cdot z + x \cdot y \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (+ (* (+ x 5.0) z) (* x y)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return ((x + 5.0) * z) + (x * y);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = ((x + 5.0d0) * z) + (x * y)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return ((x + 5.0) * z) + (x * y);
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return ((x + 5.0) * z) + (x * y)

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(x + 5.0) * z) + Float64(x * y))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = ((x + 5.0) * z) + (x * y);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(N[(N[(x + 5.0), $MachinePrecision] * z), $MachinePrecision] + N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2024321 
(FPCore (x y z)
  :name "Graphics.Rendering.Plot.Render.Plot.Legend:renderLegendOutside from plot-0.2.3.4, C"
  :precision binary64
  :pre (TRUE)

  :alt
  (! :herbie-platform default (+ (* (+ x 5) z) (* x y)))

  (+ (* x (+ y z)) (* z 5.0)))