Linear.Quaternion:$c/ from linear-1.19.1.3, A

Percentage Accurate: 98.6% → 98.6%

Time: 1.1s

Alternatives: 5

Speedup: 1.0×

• 34.4% of points produce a very large (infinite) output. You may want to add a precondition.

Specification

\[\mathsf{TRUE}\left(\right)\]

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot z\right) + z \cdot z\right) + z \cdot z \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (+ (+ (+ (* x y) (* z z)) (* z z)) (* z z)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (((x * y) + (z * z)) + (z * z)) + (z * z);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = (((x * y) + (z * z)) + (z * z)) + (z * z)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (((x * y) + (z * z)) + (z * z)) + (z * z);
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return (((x * y) + (z * z)) + (z * z)) + (z * z)

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(x * y) + Float64(z * z)) + Float64(z * z)) + Float64(z * z))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = (((x * y) + (z * z)) + (z * z)) + (z * z);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(N[(N[(N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Initial Program: 98.6% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot z\right) + z \cdot z\right) + z \cdot z \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (+ (+ (+ (* x y) (* z z)) (* z z)) (* z z)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (((x * y) + (z * z)) + (z * z)) + (z * z);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = (((x * y) + (z * z)) + (z * z)) + (z * z)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (((x * y) + (z * z)) + (z * z)) + (z * z);
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return (((x * y) + (z * z)) + (z * z)) + (z * z)

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(x * y) + Float64(z * z)) + Float64(z * z)) + Float64(z * z))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = (((x * y) + (z * z)) + (z * z)) + (z * z);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(N[(N[(N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Alternative 1: 98.6% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot z\right) + z \cdot z\right) + z \cdot z \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (+ (+ (+ (* x y) (* z z)) (* z z)) (* z z)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (((x * y) + (z * z)) + (z * z)) + (z * z);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = (((x * y) + (z * z)) + (z * z)) + (z * z)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (((x * y) + (z * z)) + (z * z)) + (z * z);
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return (((x * y) + (z * z)) + (z * z)) + (z * z)

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(x * y) + Float64(z * z)) + Float64(z * z)) + Float64(z * z))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = (((x * y) + (z * z)) + (z * z)) + (z * z);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(N[(N[(N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 98.7%

   \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot z\right) + z \cdot z\right) + z \cdot z \]
2. Add Preprocessing
3. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 2: 78.3% accurate, 1.4× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot z\right) + z \cdot z \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (+ (+ (* x y) (* z z)) (* z z)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return ((x * y) + (z * z)) + (z * z);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = ((x * y) + (z * z)) + (z * z)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return ((x * y) + (z * z)) + (z * z);
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return ((x * y) + (z * z)) + (z * z)

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(x * y) + Float64(z * z)) + Float64(z * z))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = ((x * y) + (z * z)) + (z * z);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(N[(N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 98.7%

   \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot z\right) + z \cdot z\right) + z \cdot z \]
2. Add Preprocessing

3. Taylor expanded in x around 0

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot {z}^{2}} + z \cdot z \]

5. Applied rewrites 79.3%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot z\right)} + z \cdot z \]
6. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 3: 74.4% accurate, 1.8× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \cdot z \leq 3.5 \cdot 10^{+149}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot y\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot z\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (if (<= (* z z) 3.5e+149) (* x y) (* z z)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z * z) <= 3.5e+149) {
		tmp = x * y;
	} else {
		tmp = z * z;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((z * z) <= 3.5d+149) then
        tmp = x * y
    else
        tmp = z * z
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z * z) <= 3.5e+149) {
		tmp = x * y;
	} else {
		tmp = z * z;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if (z * z) <= 3.5e+149:
		tmp = x * y
	else:
		tmp = z * z
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (Float64(z * z) <= 3.5e+149)
		tmp = Float64(x * y);
	else
		tmp = Float64(z * z);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((z * z) <= 3.5e+149)
		tmp = x * y;
	else
		tmp = z * z;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[LessEqual[N[(z * z), $MachinePrecision], 3.5e+149], N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision], N[(z * z), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (*.f64 z z) < 3.50000000000000011e149

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot z\right) + z \cdot z\right) + z \cdot z \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(2 \cdot {z}^{2} + x \cdot y\right)} + z \cdot z \]

   5. Applied rewrites 84.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot y} + z \cdot z \]

   6. Taylor expanded in x around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot {z}^{2} + \left(x \cdot y + {z}^{2}\right)} \]

   8. Applied rewrites 81.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot y} \]

   if 3.50000000000000011e149 < (*.f64 z z)

   1. Initial program 96.8%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot z\right) + z \cdot z\right) + z \cdot z \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(2 \cdot {z}^{2} + x \cdot y\right)} + z \cdot z \]

   5. Applied rewrites 69.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot y} + z \cdot z \]

   6. Taylor expanded in x around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot {z}^{2} + \left(x \cdot y + {z}^{2}\right)} \]

   8. Applied rewrites 11.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot y} \]

   9. Taylor expanded in x around inf

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(y + \left(2 \cdot \frac{{z}^{2}}{x} + \frac{{z}^{2}}{x}\right)\right)} \]

   11. Applied rewrites 69.2%

       \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot z} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 4: 77.7% accurate, 2.1× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x \cdot y + z \cdot z \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (+ (* x y) (* z z)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (x * y) + (z * z);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = (x * y) + (z * z)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (x * y) + (z * z);
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return (x * y) + (z * z)

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(Float64(x * y) + Float64(z * z))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = (x * y) + (z * z);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 98.7%

   \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot z\right) + z \cdot z\right) + z \cdot z \]
2. Add Preprocessing

3. Taylor expanded in x around 0

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(2 \cdot {z}^{2} + x \cdot y\right)} + z \cdot z \]

5. Applied rewrites 78.8%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot y} + z \cdot z \]
6. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 5: 53.0% accurate, 5.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x \cdot y \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (* x y))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x * y;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = x * y
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x * y;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return x * y

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(x * y)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = x * y;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 98.7%

   \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot z\right) + z \cdot z\right) + z \cdot z \]
2. Add Preprocessing

3. Taylor expanded in x around 0

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(2 \cdot {z}^{2} + x \cdot y\right)} + z \cdot z \]

5. Applied rewrites 78.8%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot y} + z \cdot z \]

6. Taylor expanded in x around 0

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot {z}^{2} + \left(x \cdot y + {z}^{2}\right)} \]

8. Applied rewrites 54.6%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot y} \]
9. Add Preprocessing

Developer Target 1: 98.6% accurate, 1.6× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(3 \cdot z\right) \cdot z + y \cdot x \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (+ (* (* 3.0 z) z) (* y x)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return ((3.0 * z) * z) + (y * x);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = ((3.0d0 * z) * z) + (y * x)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return ((3.0 * z) * z) + (y * x);
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return ((3.0 * z) * z) + (y * x)

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(3.0 * z) * z) + Float64(y * x))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = ((3.0 * z) * z) + (y * x);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(N[(N[(3.0 * z), $MachinePrecision] * z), $MachinePrecision] + N[(y * x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2024321 
(FPCore (x y z)
  :name "Linear.Quaternion:$c/ from linear-1.19.1.3, A"
  :precision binary64
  :pre (TRUE)

  :alt
  (! :herbie-platform default (+ (* (* 3 z) z) (* y x)))

  (+ (+ (+ (* x y) (* z z)) (* z z)) (* z z)))