Numeric.SpecFunctions:invIncompleteGamma from math-functions-0.1.5.2, C

Percentage Accurate: 100.0% → 100.0%
Time: 6.4s
Alternatives: 8
Speedup: N/A×

Specification

?
\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \frac{2.30753 + x \cdot 0.27061}{1 + x \cdot \left(0.99229 + x \cdot 0.04481\right)} - x \end{array} \]
(FPCore (x)
 :precision binary64
 (- (/ (+ 2.30753 (* x 0.27061)) (+ 1.0 (* x (+ 0.99229 (* x 0.04481))))) x))
double code(double x) {
	return ((2.30753 + (x * 0.27061)) / (1.0 + (x * (0.99229 + (x * 0.04481))))) - x;
}
real(8) function code(x)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    code = ((2.30753d0 + (x * 0.27061d0)) / (1.0d0 + (x * (0.99229d0 + (x * 0.04481d0))))) - x
end function
public static double code(double x) {
	return ((2.30753 + (x * 0.27061)) / (1.0 + (x * (0.99229 + (x * 0.04481))))) - x;
}
def code(x):
	return ((2.30753 + (x * 0.27061)) / (1.0 + (x * (0.99229 + (x * 0.04481))))) - x
function code(x)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(2.30753 + Float64(x * 0.27061)) / Float64(1.0 + Float64(x * Float64(0.99229 + Float64(x * 0.04481))))) - x)
end
function tmp = code(x)
	tmp = ((2.30753 + (x * 0.27061)) / (1.0 + (x * (0.99229 + (x * 0.04481))))) - x;
end
code[x_] := N[(N[(N[(2.30753 + N[(x * 0.27061), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / N[(1.0 + N[(x * N[(0.99229 + N[(x * 0.04481), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - x), $MachinePrecision]
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\frac{2.30753 + x \cdot 0.27061}{1 + x \cdot \left(0.99229 + x \cdot 0.04481\right)} - x
\end{array}

Sampling outcomes in binary64 precision:

Local Percentage Accuracy vs ?

The average percentage accuracy by input value. Horizontal axis shows value of an input variable; the variable is choosen in the title. Vertical axis is accuracy; higher is better. Red represent the original program, while blue represents Herbie's suggestion. These can be toggled with buttons below the plot. The line is an average while dots represent individual samples.

Accuracy vs Speed?

Herbie found 8 alternatives:

AlternativeAccuracySpeedup
The accuracy (vertical axis) and speed (horizontal axis) of each alternatives. Up and to the right is better. The red square shows the initial program, and each blue circle shows an alternative.The line shows the best available speed-accuracy tradeoffs.

Initial Program: 100.0% accurate, 1.0× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \frac{2.30753 + x \cdot 0.27061}{1 + x \cdot \left(0.99229 + x \cdot 0.04481\right)} - x \end{array} \]
(FPCore (x)
 :precision binary64
 (- (/ (+ 2.30753 (* x 0.27061)) (+ 1.0 (* x (+ 0.99229 (* x 0.04481))))) x))
double code(double x) {
	return ((2.30753 + (x * 0.27061)) / (1.0 + (x * (0.99229 + (x * 0.04481))))) - x;
}
real(8) function code(x)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    code = ((2.30753d0 + (x * 0.27061d0)) / (1.0d0 + (x * (0.99229d0 + (x * 0.04481d0))))) - x
end function
public static double code(double x) {
	return ((2.30753 + (x * 0.27061)) / (1.0 + (x * (0.99229 + (x * 0.04481))))) - x;
}
def code(x):
	return ((2.30753 + (x * 0.27061)) / (1.0 + (x * (0.99229 + (x * 0.04481))))) - x
function code(x)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(2.30753 + Float64(x * 0.27061)) / Float64(1.0 + Float64(x * Float64(0.99229 + Float64(x * 0.04481))))) - x)
end
function tmp = code(x)
	tmp = ((2.30753 + (x * 0.27061)) / (1.0 + (x * (0.99229 + (x * 0.04481))))) - x;
end
code[x_] := N[(N[(N[(2.30753 + N[(x * 0.27061), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / N[(1.0 + N[(x * N[(0.99229 + N[(x * 0.04481), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - x), $MachinePrecision]
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\frac{2.30753 + x \cdot 0.27061}{1 + x \cdot \left(0.99229 + x \cdot 0.04481\right)} - x
\end{array}

Alternative 1: 100.0% accurate, 0.7× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_0 := \mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(0.04481, x, 0.99229\right), x, 1\right)\\ \mathsf{fma}\left(x, \frac{0.27061}{t\_0}, \frac{2.30753}{t\_0} - x\right) \end{array} \end{array} \]
(FPCore (x)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_0 (fma (fma 0.04481 x 0.99229) x 1.0)))
   (fma x (/ 0.27061 t_0) (- (/ 2.30753 t_0) x))))
double code(double x) {
	double t_0 = fma(fma(0.04481, x, 0.99229), x, 1.0);
	return fma(x, (0.27061 / t_0), ((2.30753 / t_0) - x));
}
function code(x)
	t_0 = fma(fma(0.04481, x, 0.99229), x, 1.0)
	return fma(x, Float64(0.27061 / t_0), Float64(Float64(2.30753 / t_0) - x))
end
code[x_] := Block[{t$95$0 = N[(N[(0.04481 * x + 0.99229), $MachinePrecision] * x + 1.0), $MachinePrecision]}, N[(x * N[(0.27061 / t$95$0), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(2.30753 / t$95$0), $MachinePrecision] - x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\begin{array}{l}
t_0 := \mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(0.04481, x, 0.99229\right), x, 1\right)\\
\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \frac{0.27061}{t\_0}, \frac{2.30753}{t\_0} - x\right)
\end{array}
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Initial program 100.0%

    \[\frac{2.30753 + x \cdot 0.27061}{1 + x \cdot \left(0.99229 + x \cdot 0.04481\right)} - x \]
  2. Add Preprocessing
  3. Step-by-step derivation
    1. lift--.f64N/A

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{\frac{230753}{100000} + x \cdot \frac{27061}{100000}}{1 + x \cdot \left(\frac{99229}{100000} + x \cdot \frac{4481}{100000}\right)} - x} \]
    2. lift-/.f64N/A

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{\frac{230753}{100000} + x \cdot \frac{27061}{100000}}{1 + x \cdot \left(\frac{99229}{100000} + x \cdot \frac{4481}{100000}\right)}} - x \]
    3. lift-+.f64N/A

      \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{\frac{230753}{100000} + x \cdot \frac{27061}{100000}}}{1 + x \cdot \left(\frac{99229}{100000} + x \cdot \frac{4481}{100000}\right)} - x \]
    4. +-commutativeN/A

      \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{x \cdot \frac{27061}{100000} + \frac{230753}{100000}}}{1 + x \cdot \left(\frac{99229}{100000} + x \cdot \frac{4481}{100000}\right)} - x \]
    5. div-addN/A

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\frac{x \cdot \frac{27061}{100000}}{1 + x \cdot \left(\frac{99229}{100000} + x \cdot \frac{4481}{100000}\right)} + \frac{\frac{230753}{100000}}{1 + x \cdot \left(\frac{99229}{100000} + x \cdot \frac{4481}{100000}\right)}\right)} - x \]
    6. associate--l+N/A

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{x \cdot \frac{27061}{100000}}{1 + x \cdot \left(\frac{99229}{100000} + x \cdot \frac{4481}{100000}\right)} + \left(\frac{\frac{230753}{100000}}{1 + x \cdot \left(\frac{99229}{100000} + x \cdot \frac{4481}{100000}\right)} - x\right)} \]
    7. lift-*.f64N/A

      \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{x \cdot \frac{27061}{100000}}}{1 + x \cdot \left(\frac{99229}{100000} + x \cdot \frac{4481}{100000}\right)} + \left(\frac{\frac{230753}{100000}}{1 + x \cdot \left(\frac{99229}{100000} + x \cdot \frac{4481}{100000}\right)} - x\right) \]
    8. associate-/l*N/A

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \frac{\frac{27061}{100000}}{1 + x \cdot \left(\frac{99229}{100000} + x \cdot \frac{4481}{100000}\right)}} + \left(\frac{\frac{230753}{100000}}{1 + x \cdot \left(\frac{99229}{100000} + x \cdot \frac{4481}{100000}\right)} - x\right) \]
    9. lower-fma.f64N/A

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \frac{\frac{27061}{100000}}{1 + x \cdot \left(\frac{99229}{100000} + x \cdot \frac{4481}{100000}\right)}, \frac{\frac{230753}{100000}}{1 + x \cdot \left(\frac{99229}{100000} + x \cdot \frac{4481}{100000}\right)} - x\right)} \]
  4. Applied rewrites100.0%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \frac{0.27061}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(0.04481, x, 0.99229\right), x, 1\right)}, \frac{2.30753}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(0.04481, x, 0.99229\right), x, 1\right)} - x\right)} \]
  5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 2: 98.8% accurate, 0.4× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_0 := \frac{2.30753 + x \cdot 0.27061}{1 + x \cdot \left(0.99229 + x \cdot 0.04481\right)} - x\\ \mathbf{if}\;t\_0 \leq 1 \lor \neg \left(t\_0 \leq 4\right):\\ \;\;\;\;-x\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(-2.0191289437, x, 2.30753\right) - x\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]
(FPCore (x)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_0
         (-
          (/ (+ 2.30753 (* x 0.27061)) (+ 1.0 (* x (+ 0.99229 (* x 0.04481)))))
          x)))
   (if (or (<= t_0 1.0) (not (<= t_0 4.0)))
     (- x)
     (- (fma -2.0191289437 x 2.30753) x))))
double code(double x) {
	double t_0 = ((2.30753 + (x * 0.27061)) / (1.0 + (x * (0.99229 + (x * 0.04481))))) - x;
	double tmp;
	if ((t_0 <= 1.0) || !(t_0 <= 4.0)) {
		tmp = -x;
	} else {
		tmp = fma(-2.0191289437, x, 2.30753) - x;
	}
	return tmp;
}
function code(x)
	t_0 = Float64(Float64(Float64(2.30753 + Float64(x * 0.27061)) / Float64(1.0 + Float64(x * Float64(0.99229 + Float64(x * 0.04481))))) - x)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((t_0 <= 1.0) || !(t_0 <= 4.0))
		tmp = Float64(-x);
	else
		tmp = Float64(fma(-2.0191289437, x, 2.30753) - x);
	end
	return tmp
end
code[x_] := Block[{t$95$0 = N[(N[(N[(2.30753 + N[(x * 0.27061), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / N[(1.0 + N[(x * N[(0.99229 + N[(x * 0.04481), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - x), $MachinePrecision]}, If[Or[LessEqual[t$95$0, 1.0], N[Not[LessEqual[t$95$0, 4.0]], $MachinePrecision]], (-x), N[(N[(-2.0191289437 * x + 2.30753), $MachinePrecision] - x), $MachinePrecision]]]
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\begin{array}{l}
t_0 := \frac{2.30753 + x \cdot 0.27061}{1 + x \cdot \left(0.99229 + x \cdot 0.04481\right)} - x\\
\mathbf{if}\;t\_0 \leq 1 \lor \neg \left(t\_0 \leq 4\right):\\
\;\;\;\;-x\\

\mathbf{else}:\\
\;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(-2.0191289437, x, 2.30753\right) - x\\


\end{array}
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Split input into 2 regimes
  2. if (-.f64 (/.f64 (+.f64 #s(literal 230753/100000 binary64) (*.f64 x #s(literal 27061/100000 binary64))) (+.f64 #s(literal 1 binary64) (*.f64 x (+.f64 #s(literal 99229/100000 binary64) (*.f64 x #s(literal 4481/100000 binary64)))))) x) < 1 or 4 < (-.f64 (/.f64 (+.f64 #s(literal 230753/100000 binary64) (*.f64 x #s(literal 27061/100000 binary64))) (+.f64 #s(literal 1 binary64) (*.f64 x (+.f64 #s(literal 99229/100000 binary64) (*.f64 x #s(literal 4481/100000 binary64)))))) x)

    1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\frac{2.30753 + x \cdot 0.27061}{1 + x \cdot \left(0.99229 + x \cdot 0.04481\right)} - x \]
    2. Add Preprocessing
    3. Taylor expanded in x around inf

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot x} \]
    4. Step-by-step derivation
      1. mul-1-negN/A

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{neg}\left(x\right)} \]
      2. lower-neg.f6498.6

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-x} \]
    5. Applied rewrites98.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-x} \]

    if 1 < (-.f64 (/.f64 (+.f64 #s(literal 230753/100000 binary64) (*.f64 x #s(literal 27061/100000 binary64))) (+.f64 #s(literal 1 binary64) (*.f64 x (+.f64 #s(literal 99229/100000 binary64) (*.f64 x #s(literal 4481/100000 binary64)))))) x) < 4

    1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\frac{2.30753 + x \cdot 0.27061}{1 + x \cdot \left(0.99229 + x \cdot 0.04481\right)} - x \]
    2. Add Preprocessing
    3. Taylor expanded in x around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\frac{230753}{100000} + \frac{-20191289437}{10000000000} \cdot x\right)} - x \]
    4. Step-by-step derivation
      1. +-commutativeN/A

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\frac{-20191289437}{10000000000} \cdot x + \frac{230753}{100000}\right)} - x \]
      2. lower-fma.f64100.0

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(-2.0191289437, x, 2.30753\right)} - x \]
    5. Applied rewrites100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(-2.0191289437, x, 2.30753\right)} - x \]
  3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
  4. Final simplification99.4%

    \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\frac{2.30753 + x \cdot 0.27061}{1 + x \cdot \left(0.99229 + x \cdot 0.04481\right)} - x \leq 1 \lor \neg \left(\frac{2.30753 + x \cdot 0.27061}{1 + x \cdot \left(0.99229 + x \cdot 0.04481\right)} - x \leq 4\right):\\ \;\;\;\;-x\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(-2.0191289437, x, 2.30753\right) - x\\ \end{array} \]
  5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 3: 98.8% accurate, 0.4× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_0 := \frac{2.30753 + x \cdot 0.27061}{1 + x \cdot \left(0.99229 + x \cdot 0.04481\right)} - x\\ \mathbf{if}\;t\_0 \leq 1 \lor \neg \left(t\_0 \leq 4\right):\\ \;\;\;\;-x\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(-3.0191289437, x, 2.30753\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]
(FPCore (x)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_0
         (-
          (/ (+ 2.30753 (* x 0.27061)) (+ 1.0 (* x (+ 0.99229 (* x 0.04481)))))
          x)))
   (if (or (<= t_0 1.0) (not (<= t_0 4.0)))
     (- x)
     (fma -3.0191289437 x 2.30753))))
double code(double x) {
	double t_0 = ((2.30753 + (x * 0.27061)) / (1.0 + (x * (0.99229 + (x * 0.04481))))) - x;
	double tmp;
	if ((t_0 <= 1.0) || !(t_0 <= 4.0)) {
		tmp = -x;
	} else {
		tmp = fma(-3.0191289437, x, 2.30753);
	}
	return tmp;
}
function code(x)
	t_0 = Float64(Float64(Float64(2.30753 + Float64(x * 0.27061)) / Float64(1.0 + Float64(x * Float64(0.99229 + Float64(x * 0.04481))))) - x)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((t_0 <= 1.0) || !(t_0 <= 4.0))
		tmp = Float64(-x);
	else
		tmp = fma(-3.0191289437, x, 2.30753);
	end
	return tmp
end
code[x_] := Block[{t$95$0 = N[(N[(N[(2.30753 + N[(x * 0.27061), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / N[(1.0 + N[(x * N[(0.99229 + N[(x * 0.04481), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - x), $MachinePrecision]}, If[Or[LessEqual[t$95$0, 1.0], N[Not[LessEqual[t$95$0, 4.0]], $MachinePrecision]], (-x), N[(-3.0191289437 * x + 2.30753), $MachinePrecision]]]
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\begin{array}{l}
t_0 := \frac{2.30753 + x \cdot 0.27061}{1 + x \cdot \left(0.99229 + x \cdot 0.04481\right)} - x\\
\mathbf{if}\;t\_0 \leq 1 \lor \neg \left(t\_0 \leq 4\right):\\
\;\;\;\;-x\\

\mathbf{else}:\\
\;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(-3.0191289437, x, 2.30753\right)\\


\end{array}
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Split input into 2 regimes
  2. if (-.f64 (/.f64 (+.f64 #s(literal 230753/100000 binary64) (*.f64 x #s(literal 27061/100000 binary64))) (+.f64 #s(literal 1 binary64) (*.f64 x (+.f64 #s(literal 99229/100000 binary64) (*.f64 x #s(literal 4481/100000 binary64)))))) x) < 1 or 4 < (-.f64 (/.f64 (+.f64 #s(literal 230753/100000 binary64) (*.f64 x #s(literal 27061/100000 binary64))) (+.f64 #s(literal 1 binary64) (*.f64 x (+.f64 #s(literal 99229/100000 binary64) (*.f64 x #s(literal 4481/100000 binary64)))))) x)

    1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\frac{2.30753 + x \cdot 0.27061}{1 + x \cdot \left(0.99229 + x \cdot 0.04481\right)} - x \]
    2. Add Preprocessing
    3. Taylor expanded in x around inf

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot x} \]
    4. Step-by-step derivation
      1. mul-1-negN/A

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{neg}\left(x\right)} \]
      2. lower-neg.f6498.6

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-x} \]
    5. Applied rewrites98.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-x} \]

    if 1 < (-.f64 (/.f64 (+.f64 #s(literal 230753/100000 binary64) (*.f64 x #s(literal 27061/100000 binary64))) (+.f64 #s(literal 1 binary64) (*.f64 x (+.f64 #s(literal 99229/100000 binary64) (*.f64 x #s(literal 4481/100000 binary64)))))) x) < 4

    1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\frac{2.30753 + x \cdot 0.27061}{1 + x \cdot \left(0.99229 + x \cdot 0.04481\right)} - x \]
    2. Add Preprocessing
    3. Taylor expanded in x around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{230753}{100000} + \frac{-30191289437}{10000000000} \cdot x} \]
    4. Step-by-step derivation
      1. +-commutativeN/A

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{-30191289437}{10000000000} \cdot x + \frac{230753}{100000}} \]
      2. lower-fma.f64100.0

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(-3.0191289437, x, 2.30753\right)} \]
    5. Applied rewrites100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(-3.0191289437, x, 2.30753\right)} \]
  3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
  4. Final simplification99.4%

    \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\frac{2.30753 + x \cdot 0.27061}{1 + x \cdot \left(0.99229 + x \cdot 0.04481\right)} - x \leq 1 \lor \neg \left(\frac{2.30753 + x \cdot 0.27061}{1 + x \cdot \left(0.99229 + x \cdot 0.04481\right)} - x \leq 4\right):\\ \;\;\;\;-x\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(-3.0191289437, x, 2.30753\right)\\ \end{array} \]
  5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 4: 98.1% accurate, 0.4× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_0 := \frac{2.30753 + x \cdot 0.27061}{1 + x \cdot \left(0.99229 + x \cdot 0.04481\right)} - x\\ \mathbf{if}\;t\_0 \leq -2 \lor \neg \left(t\_0 \leq 4\right):\\ \;\;\;\;-x\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;2.30753\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]
(FPCore (x)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_0
         (-
          (/ (+ 2.30753 (* x 0.27061)) (+ 1.0 (* x (+ 0.99229 (* x 0.04481)))))
          x)))
   (if (or (<= t_0 -2.0) (not (<= t_0 4.0))) (- x) 2.30753)))
double code(double x) {
	double t_0 = ((2.30753 + (x * 0.27061)) / (1.0 + (x * (0.99229 + (x * 0.04481))))) - x;
	double tmp;
	if ((t_0 <= -2.0) || !(t_0 <= 4.0)) {
		tmp = -x;
	} else {
		tmp = 2.30753;
	}
	return tmp;
}
real(8) function code(x)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8) :: t_0
    real(8) :: tmp
    t_0 = ((2.30753d0 + (x * 0.27061d0)) / (1.0d0 + (x * (0.99229d0 + (x * 0.04481d0))))) - x
    if ((t_0 <= (-2.0d0)) .or. (.not. (t_0 <= 4.0d0))) then
        tmp = -x
    else
        tmp = 2.30753d0
    end if
    code = tmp
end function
public static double code(double x) {
	double t_0 = ((2.30753 + (x * 0.27061)) / (1.0 + (x * (0.99229 + (x * 0.04481))))) - x;
	double tmp;
	if ((t_0 <= -2.0) || !(t_0 <= 4.0)) {
		tmp = -x;
	} else {
		tmp = 2.30753;
	}
	return tmp;
}
def code(x):
	t_0 = ((2.30753 + (x * 0.27061)) / (1.0 + (x * (0.99229 + (x * 0.04481))))) - x
	tmp = 0
	if (t_0 <= -2.0) or not (t_0 <= 4.0):
		tmp = -x
	else:
		tmp = 2.30753
	return tmp
function code(x)
	t_0 = Float64(Float64(Float64(2.30753 + Float64(x * 0.27061)) / Float64(1.0 + Float64(x * Float64(0.99229 + Float64(x * 0.04481))))) - x)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((t_0 <= -2.0) || !(t_0 <= 4.0))
		tmp = Float64(-x);
	else
		tmp = 2.30753;
	end
	return tmp
end
function tmp_2 = code(x)
	t_0 = ((2.30753 + (x * 0.27061)) / (1.0 + (x * (0.99229 + (x * 0.04481))))) - x;
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((t_0 <= -2.0) || ~((t_0 <= 4.0)))
		tmp = -x;
	else
		tmp = 2.30753;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end
code[x_] := Block[{t$95$0 = N[(N[(N[(2.30753 + N[(x * 0.27061), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / N[(1.0 + N[(x * N[(0.99229 + N[(x * 0.04481), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - x), $MachinePrecision]}, If[Or[LessEqual[t$95$0, -2.0], N[Not[LessEqual[t$95$0, 4.0]], $MachinePrecision]], (-x), 2.30753]]
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\begin{array}{l}
t_0 := \frac{2.30753 + x \cdot 0.27061}{1 + x \cdot \left(0.99229 + x \cdot 0.04481\right)} - x\\
\mathbf{if}\;t\_0 \leq -2 \lor \neg \left(t\_0 \leq 4\right):\\
\;\;\;\;-x\\

\mathbf{else}:\\
\;\;\;\;2.30753\\


\end{array}
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Split input into 2 regimes
  2. if (-.f64 (/.f64 (+.f64 #s(literal 230753/100000 binary64) (*.f64 x #s(literal 27061/100000 binary64))) (+.f64 #s(literal 1 binary64) (*.f64 x (+.f64 #s(literal 99229/100000 binary64) (*.f64 x #s(literal 4481/100000 binary64)))))) x) < -2 or 4 < (-.f64 (/.f64 (+.f64 #s(literal 230753/100000 binary64) (*.f64 x #s(literal 27061/100000 binary64))) (+.f64 #s(literal 1 binary64) (*.f64 x (+.f64 #s(literal 99229/100000 binary64) (*.f64 x #s(literal 4481/100000 binary64)))))) x)

    1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\frac{2.30753 + x \cdot 0.27061}{1 + x \cdot \left(0.99229 + x \cdot 0.04481\right)} - x \]
    2. Add Preprocessing
    3. Taylor expanded in x around inf

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot x} \]
    4. Step-by-step derivation
      1. mul-1-negN/A

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{neg}\left(x\right)} \]
      2. lower-neg.f6499.3

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-x} \]
    5. Applied rewrites99.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-x} \]

    if -2 < (-.f64 (/.f64 (+.f64 #s(literal 230753/100000 binary64) (*.f64 x #s(literal 27061/100000 binary64))) (+.f64 #s(literal 1 binary64) (*.f64 x (+.f64 #s(literal 99229/100000 binary64) (*.f64 x #s(literal 4481/100000 binary64)))))) x) < 4

    1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\frac{2.30753 + x \cdot 0.27061}{1 + x \cdot \left(0.99229 + x \cdot 0.04481\right)} - x \]
    2. Add Preprocessing
    3. Step-by-step derivation
      1. lift--.f64N/A

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{\frac{230753}{100000} + x \cdot \frac{27061}{100000}}{1 + x \cdot \left(\frac{99229}{100000} + x \cdot \frac{4481}{100000}\right)} - x} \]
      2. lift-/.f64N/A

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{\frac{230753}{100000} + x \cdot \frac{27061}{100000}}{1 + x \cdot \left(\frac{99229}{100000} + x \cdot \frac{4481}{100000}\right)}} - x \]
      3. lift-+.f64N/A

        \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{\frac{230753}{100000} + x \cdot \frac{27061}{100000}}}{1 + x \cdot \left(\frac{99229}{100000} + x \cdot \frac{4481}{100000}\right)} - x \]
      4. +-commutativeN/A

        \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{x \cdot \frac{27061}{100000} + \frac{230753}{100000}}}{1 + x \cdot \left(\frac{99229}{100000} + x \cdot \frac{4481}{100000}\right)} - x \]
      5. div-addN/A

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\frac{x \cdot \frac{27061}{100000}}{1 + x \cdot \left(\frac{99229}{100000} + x \cdot \frac{4481}{100000}\right)} + \frac{\frac{230753}{100000}}{1 + x \cdot \left(\frac{99229}{100000} + x \cdot \frac{4481}{100000}\right)}\right)} - x \]
      6. associate--l+N/A

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{x \cdot \frac{27061}{100000}}{1 + x \cdot \left(\frac{99229}{100000} + x \cdot \frac{4481}{100000}\right)} + \left(\frac{\frac{230753}{100000}}{1 + x \cdot \left(\frac{99229}{100000} + x \cdot \frac{4481}{100000}\right)} - x\right)} \]
      7. lift-*.f64N/A

        \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{x \cdot \frac{27061}{100000}}}{1 + x \cdot \left(\frac{99229}{100000} + x \cdot \frac{4481}{100000}\right)} + \left(\frac{\frac{230753}{100000}}{1 + x \cdot \left(\frac{99229}{100000} + x \cdot \frac{4481}{100000}\right)} - x\right) \]
      8. associate-/l*N/A

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \frac{\frac{27061}{100000}}{1 + x \cdot \left(\frac{99229}{100000} + x \cdot \frac{4481}{100000}\right)}} + \left(\frac{\frac{230753}{100000}}{1 + x \cdot \left(\frac{99229}{100000} + x \cdot \frac{4481}{100000}\right)} - x\right) \]
      9. lower-fma.f64N/A

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \frac{\frac{27061}{100000}}{1 + x \cdot \left(\frac{99229}{100000} + x \cdot \frac{4481}{100000}\right)}, \frac{\frac{230753}{100000}}{1 + x \cdot \left(\frac{99229}{100000} + x \cdot \frac{4481}{100000}\right)} - x\right)} \]
    4. Applied rewrites100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \frac{0.27061}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(0.04481, x, 0.99229\right), x, 1\right)}, \frac{2.30753}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(0.04481, x, 0.99229\right), x, 1\right)} - x\right)} \]
    5. Taylor expanded in x around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{230753}{100000}} \]
    6. Step-by-step derivation
      1. Applied rewrites98.6%

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2.30753} \]
    7. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
    8. Final simplification98.9%

      \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\frac{2.30753 + x \cdot 0.27061}{1 + x \cdot \left(0.99229 + x \cdot 0.04481\right)} - x \leq -2 \lor \neg \left(\frac{2.30753 + x \cdot 0.27061}{1 + x \cdot \left(0.99229 + x \cdot 0.04481\right)} - x \leq 4\right):\\ \;\;\;\;-x\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;2.30753\\ \end{array} \]
    9. Add Preprocessing

    Alternative 5: 100.0% accurate, 1.1× speedup?

    \[\begin{array}{l} \\ \frac{2.30753 + x \cdot 0.27061}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(0.04481, x, 0.99229\right), x, 1\right)} - x \end{array} \]
    (FPCore (x)
     :precision binary64
     (- (/ (+ 2.30753 (* x 0.27061)) (fma (fma 0.04481 x 0.99229) x 1.0)) x))
    double code(double x) {
    	return ((2.30753 + (x * 0.27061)) / fma(fma(0.04481, x, 0.99229), x, 1.0)) - x;
    }
    
    function code(x)
    	return Float64(Float64(Float64(2.30753 + Float64(x * 0.27061)) / fma(fma(0.04481, x, 0.99229), x, 1.0)) - x)
    end
    
    code[x_] := N[(N[(N[(2.30753 + N[(x * 0.27061), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / N[(N[(0.04481 * x + 0.99229), $MachinePrecision] * x + 1.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - x), $MachinePrecision]
    
    \begin{array}{l}
    
    \\
    \frac{2.30753 + x \cdot 0.27061}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(0.04481, x, 0.99229\right), x, 1\right)} - x
    \end{array}
    
    Derivation
    1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\frac{2.30753 + x \cdot 0.27061}{1 + x \cdot \left(0.99229 + x \cdot 0.04481\right)} - x \]
    2. Add Preprocessing
    3. Step-by-step derivation
      1. lift-+.f64N/A

        \[\leadsto \frac{\frac{230753}{100000} + x \cdot \frac{27061}{100000}}{\color{blue}{1 + x \cdot \left(\frac{99229}{100000} + x \cdot \frac{4481}{100000}\right)}} - x \]
      2. +-commutativeN/A

        \[\leadsto \frac{\frac{230753}{100000} + x \cdot \frac{27061}{100000}}{\color{blue}{x \cdot \left(\frac{99229}{100000} + x \cdot \frac{4481}{100000}\right) + 1}} - x \]
      3. lift-*.f64N/A

        \[\leadsto \frac{\frac{230753}{100000} + x \cdot \frac{27061}{100000}}{\color{blue}{x \cdot \left(\frac{99229}{100000} + x \cdot \frac{4481}{100000}\right)} + 1} - x \]
      4. *-commutativeN/A

        \[\leadsto \frac{\frac{230753}{100000} + x \cdot \frac{27061}{100000}}{\color{blue}{\left(\frac{99229}{100000} + x \cdot \frac{4481}{100000}\right) \cdot x} + 1} - x \]
      5. lower-fma.f64100.0

        \[\leadsto \frac{2.30753 + x \cdot 0.27061}{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(0.99229 + x \cdot 0.04481, x, 1\right)}} - x \]
      6. lift-+.f64N/A

        \[\leadsto \frac{\frac{230753}{100000} + x \cdot \frac{27061}{100000}}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{\frac{99229}{100000} + x \cdot \frac{4481}{100000}}, x, 1\right)} - x \]
      7. +-commutativeN/A

        \[\leadsto \frac{\frac{230753}{100000} + x \cdot \frac{27061}{100000}}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{x \cdot \frac{4481}{100000} + \frac{99229}{100000}}, x, 1\right)} - x \]
      8. lift-*.f64N/A

        \[\leadsto \frac{\frac{230753}{100000} + x \cdot \frac{27061}{100000}}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{x \cdot \frac{4481}{100000}} + \frac{99229}{100000}, x, 1\right)} - x \]
      9. *-commutativeN/A

        \[\leadsto \frac{\frac{230753}{100000} + x \cdot \frac{27061}{100000}}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{\frac{4481}{100000} \cdot x} + \frac{99229}{100000}, x, 1\right)} - x \]
      10. lower-fma.f64100.0

        \[\leadsto \frac{2.30753 + x \cdot 0.27061}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(0.04481, x, 0.99229\right)}, x, 1\right)} - x \]
    4. Applied rewrites100.0%

      \[\leadsto \frac{2.30753 + x \cdot 0.27061}{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(0.04481, x, 0.99229\right), x, 1\right)}} - x \]
    5. Add Preprocessing

    Alternative 6: 100.0% accurate, 1.2× speedup?

    \[\begin{array}{l} \\ \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(0.27061, x, 2.30753\right)}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(0.04481, x, 0.99229\right), x, 1\right)} - x \end{array} \]
    (FPCore (x)
     :precision binary64
     (- (/ (fma 0.27061 x 2.30753) (fma (fma 0.04481 x 0.99229) x 1.0)) x))
    double code(double x) {
    	return (fma(0.27061, x, 2.30753) / fma(fma(0.04481, x, 0.99229), x, 1.0)) - x;
    }
    
    function code(x)
    	return Float64(Float64(fma(0.27061, x, 2.30753) / fma(fma(0.04481, x, 0.99229), x, 1.0)) - x)
    end
    
    code[x_] := N[(N[(N[(0.27061 * x + 2.30753), $MachinePrecision] / N[(N[(0.04481 * x + 0.99229), $MachinePrecision] * x + 1.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - x), $MachinePrecision]
    
    \begin{array}{l}
    
    \\
    \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(0.27061, x, 2.30753\right)}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(0.04481, x, 0.99229\right), x, 1\right)} - x
    \end{array}
    
    Derivation
    1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\frac{2.30753 + x \cdot 0.27061}{1 + x \cdot \left(0.99229 + x \cdot 0.04481\right)} - x \]
    2. Add Preprocessing
    3. Step-by-step derivation
      1. lift-+.f64N/A

        \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{\frac{230753}{100000} + x \cdot \frac{27061}{100000}}}{1 + x \cdot \left(\frac{99229}{100000} + x \cdot \frac{4481}{100000}\right)} - x \]
      2. +-commutativeN/A

        \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{x \cdot \frac{27061}{100000} + \frac{230753}{100000}}}{1 + x \cdot \left(\frac{99229}{100000} + x \cdot \frac{4481}{100000}\right)} - x \]
      3. lift-*.f64N/A

        \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{x \cdot \frac{27061}{100000}} + \frac{230753}{100000}}{1 + x \cdot \left(\frac{99229}{100000} + x \cdot \frac{4481}{100000}\right)} - x \]
      4. *-commutativeN/A

        \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{\frac{27061}{100000} \cdot x} + \frac{230753}{100000}}{1 + x \cdot \left(\frac{99229}{100000} + x \cdot \frac{4481}{100000}\right)} - x \]
      5. lower-fma.f64100.0

        \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(0.27061, x, 2.30753\right)}}{1 + x \cdot \left(0.99229 + x \cdot 0.04481\right)} - x \]
      6. lift-+.f64N/A

        \[\leadsto \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(\frac{27061}{100000}, x, \frac{230753}{100000}\right)}{\color{blue}{1 + x \cdot \left(\frac{99229}{100000} + x \cdot \frac{4481}{100000}\right)}} - x \]
      7. +-commutativeN/A

        \[\leadsto \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(\frac{27061}{100000}, x, \frac{230753}{100000}\right)}{\color{blue}{x \cdot \left(\frac{99229}{100000} + x \cdot \frac{4481}{100000}\right) + 1}} - x \]
      8. lift-*.f64N/A

        \[\leadsto \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(\frac{27061}{100000}, x, \frac{230753}{100000}\right)}{\color{blue}{x \cdot \left(\frac{99229}{100000} + x \cdot \frac{4481}{100000}\right)} + 1} - x \]
      9. *-commutativeN/A

        \[\leadsto \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(\frac{27061}{100000}, x, \frac{230753}{100000}\right)}{\color{blue}{\left(\frac{99229}{100000} + x \cdot \frac{4481}{100000}\right) \cdot x} + 1} - x \]
      10. lower-fma.f64100.0

        \[\leadsto \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(0.27061, x, 2.30753\right)}{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(0.99229 + x \cdot 0.04481, x, 1\right)}} - x \]
      11. lift-+.f64N/A

        \[\leadsto \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(\frac{27061}{100000}, x, \frac{230753}{100000}\right)}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{\frac{99229}{100000} + x \cdot \frac{4481}{100000}}, x, 1\right)} - x \]
      12. +-commutativeN/A

        \[\leadsto \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(\frac{27061}{100000}, x, \frac{230753}{100000}\right)}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{x \cdot \frac{4481}{100000} + \frac{99229}{100000}}, x, 1\right)} - x \]
      13. lift-*.f64N/A

        \[\leadsto \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(\frac{27061}{100000}, x, \frac{230753}{100000}\right)}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{x \cdot \frac{4481}{100000}} + \frac{99229}{100000}, x, 1\right)} - x \]
      14. *-commutativeN/A

        \[\leadsto \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(\frac{27061}{100000}, x, \frac{230753}{100000}\right)}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{\frac{4481}{100000} \cdot x} + \frac{99229}{100000}, x, 1\right)} - x \]
      15. lower-fma.f64100.0

        \[\leadsto \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(0.27061, x, 2.30753\right)}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(0.04481, x, 0.99229\right)}, x, 1\right)} - x \]
    4. Applied rewrites100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(0.27061, x, 2.30753\right)}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(0.04481, x, 0.99229\right), x, 1\right)} - x} \]
    5. Add Preprocessing

    Alternative 7: 98.5% accurate, 1.4× speedup?

    \[\begin{array}{l} \\ \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, 0.27061, 2.30753\right)}{\mathsf{fma}\left(0.99229, x, 1\right)} - x \end{array} \]
    (FPCore (x)
     :precision binary64
     (- (/ (fma x 0.27061 2.30753) (fma 0.99229 x 1.0)) x))
    double code(double x) {
    	return (fma(x, 0.27061, 2.30753) / fma(0.99229, x, 1.0)) - x;
    }
    
    function code(x)
    	return Float64(Float64(fma(x, 0.27061, 2.30753) / fma(0.99229, x, 1.0)) - x)
    end
    
    code[x_] := N[(N[(N[(x * 0.27061 + 2.30753), $MachinePrecision] / N[(0.99229 * x + 1.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - x), $MachinePrecision]
    
    \begin{array}{l}
    
    \\
    \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, 0.27061, 2.30753\right)}{\mathsf{fma}\left(0.99229, x, 1\right)} - x
    \end{array}
    
    Derivation
    1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\frac{2.30753 + x \cdot 0.27061}{1 + x \cdot \left(0.99229 + x \cdot 0.04481\right)} - x \]
    2. Add Preprocessing
    3. Taylor expanded in x around 0

      \[\leadsto \frac{\frac{230753}{100000} + x \cdot \frac{27061}{100000}}{\color{blue}{1 + \frac{99229}{100000} \cdot x}} - x \]
    4. Step-by-step derivation
      1. +-commutativeN/A

        \[\leadsto \frac{\frac{230753}{100000} + x \cdot \frac{27061}{100000}}{\color{blue}{\frac{99229}{100000} \cdot x + 1}} - x \]
      2. lower-fma.f6499.2

        \[\leadsto \frac{2.30753 + x \cdot 0.27061}{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(0.99229, x, 1\right)}} - x \]
    5. Applied rewrites99.2%

      \[\leadsto \frac{2.30753 + x \cdot 0.27061}{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(0.99229, x, 1\right)}} - x \]
    6. Step-by-step derivation
      1. lift-+.f64N/A

        \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{\frac{230753}{100000} + x \cdot \frac{27061}{100000}}}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\frac{99229}{100000}, x, 1\right)} - x \]
      2. +-commutativeN/A

        \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{x \cdot \frac{27061}{100000} + \frac{230753}{100000}}}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\frac{99229}{100000}, x, 1\right)} - x \]
      3. lift-*.f64N/A

        \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{x \cdot \frac{27061}{100000}} + \frac{230753}{100000}}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\frac{99229}{100000}, x, 1\right)} - x \]
      4. lower-fma.f6499.2

        \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, 0.27061, 2.30753\right)}}{\mathsf{fma}\left(0.99229, x, 1\right)} - x \]
    7. Applied rewrites99.2%

      \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, 0.27061, 2.30753\right)}}{\mathsf{fma}\left(0.99229, x, 1\right)} - x \]
    8. Add Preprocessing

    Alternative 8: 51.4% accurate, 39.0× speedup?

    \[\begin{array}{l} \\ 2.30753 \end{array} \]
    (FPCore (x) :precision binary64 2.30753)
    double code(double x) {
    	return 2.30753;
    }
    
    real(8) function code(x)
        real(8), intent (in) :: x
        code = 2.30753d0
    end function
    
    public static double code(double x) {
    	return 2.30753;
    }
    
    def code(x):
    	return 2.30753
    
    function code(x)
    	return 2.30753
    end
    
    function tmp = code(x)
    	tmp = 2.30753;
    end
    
    code[x_] := 2.30753
    
    \begin{array}{l}
    
    \\
    2.30753
    \end{array}
    
    Derivation
    1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\frac{2.30753 + x \cdot 0.27061}{1 + x \cdot \left(0.99229 + x \cdot 0.04481\right)} - x \]
    2. Add Preprocessing
    3. Step-by-step derivation
      1. lift--.f64N/A

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{\frac{230753}{100000} + x \cdot \frac{27061}{100000}}{1 + x \cdot \left(\frac{99229}{100000} + x \cdot \frac{4481}{100000}\right)} - x} \]
      2. lift-/.f64N/A

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{\frac{230753}{100000} + x \cdot \frac{27061}{100000}}{1 + x \cdot \left(\frac{99229}{100000} + x \cdot \frac{4481}{100000}\right)}} - x \]
      3. lift-+.f64N/A

        \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{\frac{230753}{100000} + x \cdot \frac{27061}{100000}}}{1 + x \cdot \left(\frac{99229}{100000} + x \cdot \frac{4481}{100000}\right)} - x \]
      4. +-commutativeN/A

        \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{x \cdot \frac{27061}{100000} + \frac{230753}{100000}}}{1 + x \cdot \left(\frac{99229}{100000} + x \cdot \frac{4481}{100000}\right)} - x \]
      5. div-addN/A

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\frac{x \cdot \frac{27061}{100000}}{1 + x \cdot \left(\frac{99229}{100000} + x \cdot \frac{4481}{100000}\right)} + \frac{\frac{230753}{100000}}{1 + x \cdot \left(\frac{99229}{100000} + x \cdot \frac{4481}{100000}\right)}\right)} - x \]
      6. associate--l+N/A

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{x \cdot \frac{27061}{100000}}{1 + x \cdot \left(\frac{99229}{100000} + x \cdot \frac{4481}{100000}\right)} + \left(\frac{\frac{230753}{100000}}{1 + x \cdot \left(\frac{99229}{100000} + x \cdot \frac{4481}{100000}\right)} - x\right)} \]
      7. lift-*.f64N/A

        \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{x \cdot \frac{27061}{100000}}}{1 + x \cdot \left(\frac{99229}{100000} + x \cdot \frac{4481}{100000}\right)} + \left(\frac{\frac{230753}{100000}}{1 + x \cdot \left(\frac{99229}{100000} + x \cdot \frac{4481}{100000}\right)} - x\right) \]
      8. associate-/l*N/A

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \frac{\frac{27061}{100000}}{1 + x \cdot \left(\frac{99229}{100000} + x \cdot \frac{4481}{100000}\right)}} + \left(\frac{\frac{230753}{100000}}{1 + x \cdot \left(\frac{99229}{100000} + x \cdot \frac{4481}{100000}\right)} - x\right) \]
      9. lower-fma.f64N/A

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \frac{\frac{27061}{100000}}{1 + x \cdot \left(\frac{99229}{100000} + x \cdot \frac{4481}{100000}\right)}, \frac{\frac{230753}{100000}}{1 + x \cdot \left(\frac{99229}{100000} + x \cdot \frac{4481}{100000}\right)} - x\right)} \]
    4. Applied rewrites100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \frac{0.27061}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(0.04481, x, 0.99229\right), x, 1\right)}, \frac{2.30753}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(0.04481, x, 0.99229\right), x, 1\right)} - x\right)} \]
    5. Taylor expanded in x around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{230753}{100000}} \]
    6. Step-by-step derivation
      1. Applied rewrites54.5%

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2.30753} \]
      2. Final simplification54.5%

        \[\leadsto 2.30753 \]
      3. Add Preprocessing

      Reproduce

      ?
      herbie shell --seed 2024320 
      (FPCore (x)
        :name "Numeric.SpecFunctions:invIncompleteGamma from math-functions-0.1.5.2, C"
        :precision binary64
        (- (/ (+ 2.30753 (* x 0.27061)) (+ 1.0 (* x (+ 0.99229 (* x 0.04481))))) x))