Data.Colour.RGBSpace.HSL:hsl from colour-2.3.3, E

Percentage Accurate: 99.7% → 99.8%
Time: 7.0s
Alternatives: 7
Speedup: 1.1×

Specification

?
\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x + \left(\left(y - x\right) \cdot 6\right) \cdot z \end{array} \]
(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (+ x (* (* (- y x) 6.0) z)))
double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x + (((y - x) * 6.0) * z);
}
real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = x + (((y - x) * 6.0d0) * z)
end function
public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x + (((y - x) * 6.0) * z);
}
def code(x, y, z):
	return x + (((y - x) * 6.0) * z)
function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(x + Float64(Float64(Float64(y - x) * 6.0) * z))
end
function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = x + (((y - x) * 6.0) * z);
end
code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(x + N[(N[(N[(y - x), $MachinePrecision] * 6.0), $MachinePrecision] * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]
\begin{array}{l}

\\
x + \left(\left(y - x\right) \cdot 6\right) \cdot z
\end{array}

Sampling outcomes in binary64 precision:

Local Percentage Accuracy vs ?

The average percentage accuracy by input value. Horizontal axis shows value of an input variable; the variable is choosen in the title. Vertical axis is accuracy; higher is better. Red represent the original program, while blue represents Herbie's suggestion. These can be toggled with buttons below the plot. The line is an average while dots represent individual samples.

Accuracy vs Speed?

Herbie found 7 alternatives:

AlternativeAccuracySpeedup
The accuracy (vertical axis) and speed (horizontal axis) of each alternatives. Up and to the right is better. The red square shows the initial program, and each blue circle shows an alternative.The line shows the best available speed-accuracy tradeoffs.

Initial Program: 99.7% accurate, 1.0× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x + \left(\left(y - x\right) \cdot 6\right) \cdot z \end{array} \]
(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (+ x (* (* (- y x) 6.0) z)))
double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x + (((y - x) * 6.0) * z);
}
real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = x + (((y - x) * 6.0d0) * z)
end function
public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x + (((y - x) * 6.0) * z);
}
def code(x, y, z):
	return x + (((y - x) * 6.0) * z)
function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(x + Float64(Float64(Float64(y - x) * 6.0) * z))
end
function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = x + (((y - x) * 6.0) * z);
end
code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(x + N[(N[(N[(y - x), $MachinePrecision] * 6.0), $MachinePrecision] * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]
\begin{array}{l}

\\
x + \left(\left(y - x\right) \cdot 6\right) \cdot z
\end{array}

Alternative 1: 99.8% accurate, 1.1× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \mathsf{fma}\left(y - x, z \cdot 6, x\right) \end{array} \]
(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (fma (- y x) (* z 6.0) x))
double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return fma((y - x), (z * 6.0), x);
}
function code(x, y, z)
	return fma(Float64(y - x), Float64(z * 6.0), x)
end
code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(N[(y - x), $MachinePrecision] * N[(z * 6.0), $MachinePrecision] + x), $MachinePrecision]
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\mathsf{fma}\left(y - x, z \cdot 6, x\right)
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Initial program 99.8%

    \[x + \left(\left(y - x\right) \cdot 6\right) \cdot z \]
  2. Add Preprocessing
  3. Step-by-step derivation
    1. lift-+.f64N/A

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \left(\left(y - x\right) \cdot 6\right) \cdot z} \]
    2. +-commutativeN/A

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(y - x\right) \cdot 6\right) \cdot z + x} \]
    3. lift-*.f64N/A

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(y - x\right) \cdot 6\right) \cdot z} + x \]
    4. lift-*.f64N/A

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(y - x\right) \cdot 6\right)} \cdot z + x \]
    5. associate-*l*N/A

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y - x\right) \cdot \left(6 \cdot z\right)} + x \]
    6. lower-fma.f64N/A

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y - x, 6 \cdot z, x\right)} \]
    7. *-commutativeN/A

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y - x, \color{blue}{z \cdot 6}, x\right) \]
    8. lower-*.f6499.8

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y - x, \color{blue}{z \cdot 6}, x\right) \]
  4. Applied rewrites99.8%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y - x, z \cdot 6, x\right)} \]
  5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 2: 98.6% accurate, 0.7× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -0.17 \lor \neg \left(z \leq 0.166\right):\\ \;\;\;\;\left(6 \cdot \left(y - x\right)\right) \cdot z\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(6 \cdot y, z, x\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]
(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= z -0.17) (not (<= z 0.166)))
   (* (* 6.0 (- y x)) z)
   (fma (* 6.0 y) z x)))
double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z <= -0.17) || !(z <= 0.166)) {
		tmp = (6.0 * (y - x)) * z;
	} else {
		tmp = fma((6.0 * y), z, x);
	}
	return tmp;
}
function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((z <= -0.17) || !(z <= 0.166))
		tmp = Float64(Float64(6.0 * Float64(y - x)) * z);
	else
		tmp = fma(Float64(6.0 * y), z, x);
	end
	return tmp
end
code[x_, y_, z_] := If[Or[LessEqual[z, -0.17], N[Not[LessEqual[z, 0.166]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(N[(6.0 * N[(y - x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] * z), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[(6.0 * y), $MachinePrecision] * z + x), $MachinePrecision]]
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\begin{array}{l}
\mathbf{if}\;z \leq -0.17 \lor \neg \left(z \leq 0.166\right):\\
\;\;\;\;\left(6 \cdot \left(y - x\right)\right) \cdot z\\

\mathbf{else}:\\
\;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(6 \cdot y, z, x\right)\\


\end{array}
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Split input into 2 regimes
  2. if z < -0.170000000000000012 or 0.166000000000000009 < z

    1. Initial program 99.7%

      \[x + \left(\left(y - x\right) \cdot 6\right) \cdot z \]
    2. Add Preprocessing
    3. Taylor expanded in x around inf

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(1 + -6 \cdot z\right)} \]
    4. Step-by-step derivation
      1. *-commutativeN/A

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 + -6 \cdot z\right) \cdot x} \]
      2. lower-*.f64N/A

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 + -6 \cdot z\right) \cdot x} \]
      3. +-commutativeN/A

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-6 \cdot z + 1\right)} \cdot x \]
      4. lower-fma.f6459.6

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(-6, z, 1\right)} \cdot x \]
    5. Applied rewrites59.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(-6, z, 1\right) \cdot x} \]
    6. Step-by-step derivation
      1. Applied rewrites59.6%

        \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z \cdot x, \color{blue}{-6}, x\right) \]
      2. Taylor expanded in z around inf

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{6 \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(y - x\right)\right)} \]
      3. Step-by-step derivation
        1. *-commutativeN/A

          \[\leadsto 6 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\left(y - x\right) \cdot z\right)} \]
        2. associate-*r*N/A

          \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(6 \cdot \left(y - x\right)\right) \cdot z} \]
        3. lower-*.f64N/A

          \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(6 \cdot \left(y - x\right)\right) \cdot z} \]
        4. lower-*.f64N/A

          \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(6 \cdot \left(y - x\right)\right)} \cdot z \]
        5. lower--.f6499.1

          \[\leadsto \left(6 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(y - x\right)}\right) \cdot z \]
      4. Applied rewrites99.1%

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(6 \cdot \left(y - x\right)\right) \cdot z} \]

      if -0.170000000000000012 < z < 0.166000000000000009

      1. Initial program 99.9%

        \[x + \left(\left(y - x\right) \cdot 6\right) \cdot z \]
      2. Add Preprocessing
      3. Taylor expanded in x around 0

        \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(6 \cdot y\right)} \cdot z \]
      4. Step-by-step derivation
        1. lower-*.f6498.5

          \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(6 \cdot y\right)} \cdot z \]
      5. Applied rewrites98.5%

        \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(6 \cdot y\right)} \cdot z \]
      6. Step-by-step derivation
        1. lift-+.f64N/A

          \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \left(6 \cdot y\right) \cdot z} \]
        2. +-commutativeN/A

          \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(6 \cdot y\right) \cdot z + x} \]
        3. lift-*.f64N/A

          \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(6 \cdot y\right) \cdot z} + x \]
        4. lower-fma.f6498.5

          \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(6 \cdot y, z, x\right)} \]
      7. Applied rewrites98.5%

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(6 \cdot y, z, x\right)} \]
    7. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
    8. Final simplification98.8%

      \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -0.17 \lor \neg \left(z \leq 0.166\right):\\ \;\;\;\;\left(6 \cdot \left(y - x\right)\right) \cdot z\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(6 \cdot y, z, x\right)\\ \end{array} \]
    9. Add Preprocessing

    Alternative 3: 75.7% accurate, 0.7× speedup?

    \[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -2.1 \cdot 10^{-100} \lor \neg \left(x \leq 4.6 \cdot 10^{-36}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(-6, z, 1\right) \cdot x\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(6 \cdot z\right) \cdot y\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]
    (FPCore (x y z)
     :precision binary64
     (if (or (<= x -2.1e-100) (not (<= x 4.6e-36)))
       (* (fma -6.0 z 1.0) x)
       (* (* 6.0 z) y)))
    double code(double x, double y, double z) {
    	double tmp;
    	if ((x <= -2.1e-100) || !(x <= 4.6e-36)) {
    		tmp = fma(-6.0, z, 1.0) * x;
    	} else {
    		tmp = (6.0 * z) * y;
    	}
    	return tmp;
    }
    
    function code(x, y, z)
    	tmp = 0.0
    	if ((x <= -2.1e-100) || !(x <= 4.6e-36))
    		tmp = Float64(fma(-6.0, z, 1.0) * x);
    	else
    		tmp = Float64(Float64(6.0 * z) * y);
    	end
    	return tmp
    end
    
    code[x_, y_, z_] := If[Or[LessEqual[x, -2.1e-100], N[Not[LessEqual[x, 4.6e-36]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(N[(-6.0 * z + 1.0), $MachinePrecision] * x), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[(6.0 * z), $MachinePrecision] * y), $MachinePrecision]]
    
    \begin{array}{l}
    
    \\
    \begin{array}{l}
    \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -2.1 \cdot 10^{-100} \lor \neg \left(x \leq 4.6 \cdot 10^{-36}\right):\\
    \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(-6, z, 1\right) \cdot x\\
    
    \mathbf{else}:\\
    \;\;\;\;\left(6 \cdot z\right) \cdot y\\
    
    
    \end{array}
    \end{array}
    
    Derivation
    1. Split input into 2 regimes
    2. if x < -2.10000000000000009e-100 or 4.59999999999999993e-36 < x

      1. Initial program 99.8%

        \[x + \left(\left(y - x\right) \cdot 6\right) \cdot z \]
      2. Add Preprocessing
      3. Taylor expanded in x around inf

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(1 + -6 \cdot z\right)} \]
      4. Step-by-step derivation
        1. *-commutativeN/A

          \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 + -6 \cdot z\right) \cdot x} \]
        2. lower-*.f64N/A

          \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 + -6 \cdot z\right) \cdot x} \]
        3. +-commutativeN/A

          \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-6 \cdot z + 1\right)} \cdot x \]
        4. lower-fma.f6484.7

          \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(-6, z, 1\right)} \cdot x \]
      5. Applied rewrites84.7%

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(-6, z, 1\right) \cdot x} \]

      if -2.10000000000000009e-100 < x < 4.59999999999999993e-36

      1. Initial program 99.7%

        \[x + \left(\left(y - x\right) \cdot 6\right) \cdot z \]
      2. Add Preprocessing
      3. Taylor expanded in x around 0

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{6 \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)} \]
      4. Step-by-step derivation
        1. *-commutativeN/A

          \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot 6} \]
        2. lower-*.f64N/A

          \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot 6} \]
        3. *-commutativeN/A

          \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(z \cdot y\right)} \cdot 6 \]
        4. lower-*.f6475.9

          \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(z \cdot y\right)} \cdot 6 \]
      5. Applied rewrites75.9%

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(z \cdot y\right) \cdot 6} \]
      6. Step-by-step derivation
        1. Applied rewrites75.9%

          \[\leadsto \left(6 \cdot z\right) \cdot \color{blue}{y} \]
      7. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
      8. Final simplification81.7%

        \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -2.1 \cdot 10^{-100} \lor \neg \left(x \leq 4.6 \cdot 10^{-36}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(-6, z, 1\right) \cdot x\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(6 \cdot z\right) \cdot y\\ \end{array} \]
      9. Add Preprocessing

      Alternative 4: 86.6% accurate, 0.7× speedup?

      \[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -4.4 \cdot 10^{+15}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(-6, z, 1\right) \cdot x\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \leq 110000000:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(6 \cdot y, z, x\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(z \cdot x, -6, x\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]
      (FPCore (x y z)
       :precision binary64
       (if (<= x -4.4e+15)
         (* (fma -6.0 z 1.0) x)
         (if (<= x 110000000.0) (fma (* 6.0 y) z x) (fma (* z x) -6.0 x))))
      double code(double x, double y, double z) {
      	double tmp;
      	if (x <= -4.4e+15) {
      		tmp = fma(-6.0, z, 1.0) * x;
      	} else if (x <= 110000000.0) {
      		tmp = fma((6.0 * y), z, x);
      	} else {
      		tmp = fma((z * x), -6.0, x);
      	}
      	return tmp;
      }
      
      function code(x, y, z)
      	tmp = 0.0
      	if (x <= -4.4e+15)
      		tmp = Float64(fma(-6.0, z, 1.0) * x);
      	elseif (x <= 110000000.0)
      		tmp = fma(Float64(6.0 * y), z, x);
      	else
      		tmp = fma(Float64(z * x), -6.0, x);
      	end
      	return tmp
      end
      
      code[x_, y_, z_] := If[LessEqual[x, -4.4e+15], N[(N[(-6.0 * z + 1.0), $MachinePrecision] * x), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[x, 110000000.0], N[(N[(6.0 * y), $MachinePrecision] * z + x), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[(z * x), $MachinePrecision] * -6.0 + x), $MachinePrecision]]]
      
      \begin{array}{l}
      
      \\
      \begin{array}{l}
      \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -4.4 \cdot 10^{+15}:\\
      \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(-6, z, 1\right) \cdot x\\
      
      \mathbf{elif}\;x \leq 110000000:\\
      \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(6 \cdot y, z, x\right)\\
      
      \mathbf{else}:\\
      \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(z \cdot x, -6, x\right)\\
      
      
      \end{array}
      \end{array}
      
      Derivation
      1. Split input into 3 regimes
      2. if x < -4.4e15

        1. Initial program 99.9%

          \[x + \left(\left(y - x\right) \cdot 6\right) \cdot z \]
        2. Add Preprocessing
        3. Taylor expanded in x around inf

          \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(1 + -6 \cdot z\right)} \]
        4. Step-by-step derivation
          1. *-commutativeN/A

            \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 + -6 \cdot z\right) \cdot x} \]
          2. lower-*.f64N/A

            \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 + -6 \cdot z\right) \cdot x} \]
          3. +-commutativeN/A

            \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-6 \cdot z + 1\right)} \cdot x \]
          4. lower-fma.f6493.9

            \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(-6, z, 1\right)} \cdot x \]
        5. Applied rewrites93.9%

          \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(-6, z, 1\right) \cdot x} \]

        if -4.4e15 < x < 1.1e8

        1. Initial program 99.7%

          \[x + \left(\left(y - x\right) \cdot 6\right) \cdot z \]
        2. Add Preprocessing
        3. Taylor expanded in x around 0

          \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(6 \cdot y\right)} \cdot z \]
        4. Step-by-step derivation
          1. lower-*.f6489.3

            \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(6 \cdot y\right)} \cdot z \]
        5. Applied rewrites89.3%

          \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(6 \cdot y\right)} \cdot z \]
        6. Step-by-step derivation
          1. lift-+.f64N/A

            \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \left(6 \cdot y\right) \cdot z} \]
          2. +-commutativeN/A

            \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(6 \cdot y\right) \cdot z + x} \]
          3. lift-*.f64N/A

            \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(6 \cdot y\right) \cdot z} + x \]
          4. lower-fma.f6489.3

            \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(6 \cdot y, z, x\right)} \]
        7. Applied rewrites89.3%

          \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(6 \cdot y, z, x\right)} \]

        if 1.1e8 < x

        1. Initial program 99.8%

          \[x + \left(\left(y - x\right) \cdot 6\right) \cdot z \]
        2. Add Preprocessing
        3. Taylor expanded in x around inf

          \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(1 + -6 \cdot z\right)} \]
        4. Step-by-step derivation
          1. *-commutativeN/A

            \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 + -6 \cdot z\right) \cdot x} \]
          2. lower-*.f64N/A

            \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 + -6 \cdot z\right) \cdot x} \]
          3. +-commutativeN/A

            \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-6 \cdot z + 1\right)} \cdot x \]
          4. lower-fma.f6489.5

            \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(-6, z, 1\right)} \cdot x \]
        5. Applied rewrites89.5%

          \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(-6, z, 1\right) \cdot x} \]
        6. Step-by-step derivation
          1. Applied rewrites89.5%

            \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z \cdot x, \color{blue}{-6}, x\right) \]
        7. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.
        8. Add Preprocessing

        Alternative 5: 61.3% accurate, 0.7× speedup?

        \[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -0.17 \lor \neg \left(z \leq 0.166\right):\\ \;\;\;\;\left(-6 \cdot z\right) \cdot x\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;1 \cdot x\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]
        (FPCore (x y z)
         :precision binary64
         (if (or (<= z -0.17) (not (<= z 0.166))) (* (* -6.0 z) x) (* 1.0 x)))
        double code(double x, double y, double z) {
        	double tmp;
        	if ((z <= -0.17) || !(z <= 0.166)) {
        		tmp = (-6.0 * z) * x;
        	} else {
        		tmp = 1.0 * x;
        	}
        	return tmp;
        }
        
        real(8) function code(x, y, z)
            real(8), intent (in) :: x
            real(8), intent (in) :: y
            real(8), intent (in) :: z
            real(8) :: tmp
            if ((z <= (-0.17d0)) .or. (.not. (z <= 0.166d0))) then
                tmp = ((-6.0d0) * z) * x
            else
                tmp = 1.0d0 * x
            end if
            code = tmp
        end function
        
        public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
        	double tmp;
        	if ((z <= -0.17) || !(z <= 0.166)) {
        		tmp = (-6.0 * z) * x;
        	} else {
        		tmp = 1.0 * x;
        	}
        	return tmp;
        }
        
        def code(x, y, z):
        	tmp = 0
        	if (z <= -0.17) or not (z <= 0.166):
        		tmp = (-6.0 * z) * x
        	else:
        		tmp = 1.0 * x
        	return tmp
        
        function code(x, y, z)
        	tmp = 0.0
        	if ((z <= -0.17) || !(z <= 0.166))
        		tmp = Float64(Float64(-6.0 * z) * x);
        	else
        		tmp = Float64(1.0 * x);
        	end
        	return tmp
        end
        
        function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
        	tmp = 0.0;
        	if ((z <= -0.17) || ~((z <= 0.166)))
        		tmp = (-6.0 * z) * x;
        	else
        		tmp = 1.0 * x;
        	end
        	tmp_2 = tmp;
        end
        
        code[x_, y_, z_] := If[Or[LessEqual[z, -0.17], N[Not[LessEqual[z, 0.166]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(N[(-6.0 * z), $MachinePrecision] * x), $MachinePrecision], N[(1.0 * x), $MachinePrecision]]
        
        \begin{array}{l}
        
        \\
        \begin{array}{l}
        \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -0.17 \lor \neg \left(z \leq 0.166\right):\\
        \;\;\;\;\left(-6 \cdot z\right) \cdot x\\
        
        \mathbf{else}:\\
        \;\;\;\;1 \cdot x\\
        
        
        \end{array}
        \end{array}
        
        Derivation
        1. Split input into 2 regimes
        2. if z < -0.170000000000000012 or 0.166000000000000009 < z

          1. Initial program 99.7%

            \[x + \left(\left(y - x\right) \cdot 6\right) \cdot z \]
          2. Add Preprocessing
          3. Taylor expanded in x around inf

            \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(1 + -6 \cdot z\right)} \]
          4. Step-by-step derivation
            1. *-commutativeN/A

              \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 + -6 \cdot z\right) \cdot x} \]
            2. lower-*.f64N/A

              \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 + -6 \cdot z\right) \cdot x} \]
            3. +-commutativeN/A

              \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-6 \cdot z + 1\right)} \cdot x \]
            4. lower-fma.f6459.6

              \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(-6, z, 1\right)} \cdot x \]
          5. Applied rewrites59.6%

            \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(-6, z, 1\right) \cdot x} \]
          6. Taylor expanded in z around inf

            \[\leadsto \left(-6 \cdot z\right) \cdot x \]
          7. Step-by-step derivation
            1. Applied rewrites59.0%

              \[\leadsto \left(-6 \cdot z\right) \cdot x \]

            if -0.170000000000000012 < z < 0.166000000000000009

            1. Initial program 99.9%

              \[x + \left(\left(y - x\right) \cdot 6\right) \cdot z \]
            2. Add Preprocessing
            3. Taylor expanded in x around inf

              \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(1 + -6 \cdot z\right)} \]
            4. Step-by-step derivation
              1. *-commutativeN/A

                \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 + -6 \cdot z\right) \cdot x} \]
              2. lower-*.f64N/A

                \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 + -6 \cdot z\right) \cdot x} \]
              3. +-commutativeN/A

                \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-6 \cdot z + 1\right)} \cdot x \]
              4. lower-fma.f6471.4

                \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(-6, z, 1\right)} \cdot x \]
            5. Applied rewrites71.4%

              \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(-6, z, 1\right) \cdot x} \]
            6. Taylor expanded in z around 0

              \[\leadsto 1 \cdot x \]
            7. Step-by-step derivation
              1. Applied rewrites70.0%

                \[\leadsto 1 \cdot x \]
            8. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
            9. Final simplification64.1%

              \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -0.17 \lor \neg \left(z \leq 0.166\right):\\ \;\;\;\;\left(-6 \cdot z\right) \cdot x\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;1 \cdot x\\ \end{array} \]
            10. Add Preprocessing

            Alternative 6: 61.3% accurate, 0.7× speedup?

            \[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -0.17 \lor \neg \left(z \leq 0.166\right):\\ \;\;\;\;\left(-6 \cdot x\right) \cdot z\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;1 \cdot x\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]
            (FPCore (x y z)
             :precision binary64
             (if (or (<= z -0.17) (not (<= z 0.166))) (* (* -6.0 x) z) (* 1.0 x)))
            double code(double x, double y, double z) {
            	double tmp;
            	if ((z <= -0.17) || !(z <= 0.166)) {
            		tmp = (-6.0 * x) * z;
            	} else {
            		tmp = 1.0 * x;
            	}
            	return tmp;
            }
            
            real(8) function code(x, y, z)
                real(8), intent (in) :: x
                real(8), intent (in) :: y
                real(8), intent (in) :: z
                real(8) :: tmp
                if ((z <= (-0.17d0)) .or. (.not. (z <= 0.166d0))) then
                    tmp = ((-6.0d0) * x) * z
                else
                    tmp = 1.0d0 * x
                end if
                code = tmp
            end function
            
            public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
            	double tmp;
            	if ((z <= -0.17) || !(z <= 0.166)) {
            		tmp = (-6.0 * x) * z;
            	} else {
            		tmp = 1.0 * x;
            	}
            	return tmp;
            }
            
            def code(x, y, z):
            	tmp = 0
            	if (z <= -0.17) or not (z <= 0.166):
            		tmp = (-6.0 * x) * z
            	else:
            		tmp = 1.0 * x
            	return tmp
            
            function code(x, y, z)
            	tmp = 0.0
            	if ((z <= -0.17) || !(z <= 0.166))
            		tmp = Float64(Float64(-6.0 * x) * z);
            	else
            		tmp = Float64(1.0 * x);
            	end
            	return tmp
            end
            
            function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
            	tmp = 0.0;
            	if ((z <= -0.17) || ~((z <= 0.166)))
            		tmp = (-6.0 * x) * z;
            	else
            		tmp = 1.0 * x;
            	end
            	tmp_2 = tmp;
            end
            
            code[x_, y_, z_] := If[Or[LessEqual[z, -0.17], N[Not[LessEqual[z, 0.166]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(N[(-6.0 * x), $MachinePrecision] * z), $MachinePrecision], N[(1.0 * x), $MachinePrecision]]
            
            \begin{array}{l}
            
            \\
            \begin{array}{l}
            \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -0.17 \lor \neg \left(z \leq 0.166\right):\\
            \;\;\;\;\left(-6 \cdot x\right) \cdot z\\
            
            \mathbf{else}:\\
            \;\;\;\;1 \cdot x\\
            
            
            \end{array}
            \end{array}
            
            Derivation
            1. Split input into 2 regimes
            2. if z < -0.170000000000000012 or 0.166000000000000009 < z

              1. Initial program 99.7%

                \[x + \left(\left(y - x\right) \cdot 6\right) \cdot z \]
              2. Add Preprocessing
              3. Taylor expanded in x around inf

                \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(1 + -6 \cdot z\right)} \]
              4. Step-by-step derivation
                1. *-commutativeN/A

                  \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 + -6 \cdot z\right) \cdot x} \]
                2. lower-*.f64N/A

                  \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 + -6 \cdot z\right) \cdot x} \]
                3. +-commutativeN/A

                  \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-6 \cdot z + 1\right)} \cdot x \]
                4. lower-fma.f6459.6

                  \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(-6, z, 1\right)} \cdot x \]
              5. Applied rewrites59.6%

                \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(-6, z, 1\right) \cdot x} \]
              6. Step-by-step derivation
                1. Applied rewrites59.6%

                  \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z \cdot x, \color{blue}{-6}, x\right) \]
                2. Taylor expanded in z around inf

                  \[\leadsto -6 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot z\right)} \]
                3. Step-by-step derivation
                  1. Applied rewrites59.0%

                    \[\leadsto \left(-6 \cdot x\right) \cdot \color{blue}{z} \]

                  if -0.170000000000000012 < z < 0.166000000000000009

                  1. Initial program 99.9%

                    \[x + \left(\left(y - x\right) \cdot 6\right) \cdot z \]
                  2. Add Preprocessing
                  3. Taylor expanded in x around inf

                    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(1 + -6 \cdot z\right)} \]
                  4. Step-by-step derivation
                    1. *-commutativeN/A

                      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 + -6 \cdot z\right) \cdot x} \]
                    2. lower-*.f64N/A

                      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 + -6 \cdot z\right) \cdot x} \]
                    3. +-commutativeN/A

                      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-6 \cdot z + 1\right)} \cdot x \]
                    4. lower-fma.f6471.4

                      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(-6, z, 1\right)} \cdot x \]
                  5. Applied rewrites71.4%

                    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(-6, z, 1\right) \cdot x} \]
                  6. Taylor expanded in z around 0

                    \[\leadsto 1 \cdot x \]
                  7. Step-by-step derivation
                    1. Applied rewrites70.0%

                      \[\leadsto 1 \cdot x \]
                  8. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
                  9. Final simplification64.1%

                    \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -0.17 \lor \neg \left(z \leq 0.166\right):\\ \;\;\;\;\left(-6 \cdot x\right) \cdot z\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;1 \cdot x\\ \end{array} \]
                  10. Add Preprocessing

                  Alternative 7: 36.6% accurate, 2.8× speedup?

                  \[\begin{array}{l} \\ 1 \cdot x \end{array} \]
                  (FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (* 1.0 x))
                  double code(double x, double y, double z) {
                  	return 1.0 * x;
                  }
                  
                  real(8) function code(x, y, z)
                      real(8), intent (in) :: x
                      real(8), intent (in) :: y
                      real(8), intent (in) :: z
                      code = 1.0d0 * x
                  end function
                  
                  public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
                  	return 1.0 * x;
                  }
                  
                  def code(x, y, z):
                  	return 1.0 * x
                  
                  function code(x, y, z)
                  	return Float64(1.0 * x)
                  end
                  
                  function tmp = code(x, y, z)
                  	tmp = 1.0 * x;
                  end
                  
                  code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(1.0 * x), $MachinePrecision]
                  
                  \begin{array}{l}
                  
                  \\
                  1 \cdot x
                  \end{array}
                  
                  Derivation
                  1. Initial program 99.8%

                    \[x + \left(\left(y - x\right) \cdot 6\right) \cdot z \]
                  2. Add Preprocessing
                  3. Taylor expanded in x around inf

                    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(1 + -6 \cdot z\right)} \]
                  4. Step-by-step derivation
                    1. *-commutativeN/A

                      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 + -6 \cdot z\right) \cdot x} \]
                    2. lower-*.f64N/A

                      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 + -6 \cdot z\right) \cdot x} \]
                    3. +-commutativeN/A

                      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-6 \cdot z + 1\right)} \cdot x \]
                    4. lower-fma.f6465.1

                      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(-6, z, 1\right)} \cdot x \]
                  5. Applied rewrites65.1%

                    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(-6, z, 1\right) \cdot x} \]
                  6. Taylor expanded in z around 0

                    \[\leadsto 1 \cdot x \]
                  7. Step-by-step derivation
                    1. Applied rewrites33.8%

                      \[\leadsto 1 \cdot x \]
                    2. Add Preprocessing

                    Developer Target 1: 99.8% accurate, 1.0× speedup?

                    \[\begin{array}{l} \\ x - \left(6 \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(x - y\right) \end{array} \]
                    (FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (- x (* (* 6.0 z) (- x y))))
                    double code(double x, double y, double z) {
                    	return x - ((6.0 * z) * (x - y));
                    }
                    
                    real(8) function code(x, y, z)
                        real(8), intent (in) :: x
                        real(8), intent (in) :: y
                        real(8), intent (in) :: z
                        code = x - ((6.0d0 * z) * (x - y))
                    end function
                    
                    public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
                    	return x - ((6.0 * z) * (x - y));
                    }
                    
                    def code(x, y, z):
                    	return x - ((6.0 * z) * (x - y))
                    
                    function code(x, y, z)
                    	return Float64(x - Float64(Float64(6.0 * z) * Float64(x - y)))
                    end
                    
                    function tmp = code(x, y, z)
                    	tmp = x - ((6.0 * z) * (x - y));
                    end
                    
                    code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(x - N[(N[(6.0 * z), $MachinePrecision] * N[(x - y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]
                    
                    \begin{array}{l}
                    
                    \\
                    x - \left(6 \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(x - y\right)
                    \end{array}
                    

                    Reproduce

                    ?
                    herbie shell --seed 2024320 
                    (FPCore (x y z)
                      :name "Data.Colour.RGBSpace.HSL:hsl from colour-2.3.3, E"
                      :precision binary64
                    
                      :alt
                      (! :herbie-platform default (- x (* (* 6 z) (- x y))))
                    
                      (+ x (* (* (- y x) 6.0) z)))