Graphics.Rasterific.CubicBezier:cachedBezierAt from Rasterific-0.6.1

Percentage Accurate: 91.9% → 96.6%

Time: 6.2s

Alternatives: 9

Speedup: 1.2×

• 31.9% of points produce a very large (infinite) output. You may want to add a precondition.

Specification

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b)
 :precision binary64
 (+ (+ (+ x (* y z)) (* t a)) (* (* a z) b)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	return ((x + (y * z)) + (t * a)) + ((a * z) * b);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    code = ((x + (y * z)) + (t * a)) + ((a * z) * b)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	return ((x + (y * z)) + (t * a)) + ((a * z) * b);
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b):
	return ((x + (y * z)) + (t * a)) + ((a * z) * b)

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(x + Float64(y * z)) + Float64(t * a)) + Float64(Float64(a * z) * b))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = ((x + (y * z)) + (t * a)) + ((a * z) * b);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := N[(N[(N[(x + N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(t * a), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(a * z), $MachinePrecision] * b), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Initial Program: 91.9% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b)
 :precision binary64
 (+ (+ (+ x (* y z)) (* t a)) (* (* a z) b)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	return ((x + (y * z)) + (t * a)) + ((a * z) * b);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    code = ((x + (y * z)) + (t * a)) + ((a * z) * b)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	return ((x + (y * z)) + (t * a)) + ((a * z) * b);
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b):
	return ((x + (y * z)) + (t * a)) + ((a * z) * b)

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(x + Float64(y * z)) + Float64(t * a)) + Float64(Float64(a * z) * b))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = ((x + (y * z)) + (t * a)) + ((a * z) * b);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := N[(N[(N[(x + N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(t * a), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(a * z), $MachinePrecision] * b), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Alternative 1: 96.6% accurate, 0.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_1 := \left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b\\ \mathbf{if}\;t\_1 \leq \infty:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_1\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, y\right) \cdot z\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_1 (+ (+ (+ x (* y z)) (* t a)) (* (* a z) b))))
   (if (<= t_1 INFINITY) t_1 (* (fma b a y) z))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double t_1 = ((x + (y * z)) + (t * a)) + ((a * z) * b);
	double tmp;
	if (t_1 <= ((double) INFINITY)) {
		tmp = t_1;
	} else {
		tmp = fma(b, a, y) * z;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	t_1 = Float64(Float64(Float64(x + Float64(y * z)) + Float64(t * a)) + Float64(Float64(a * z) * b))
	tmp = 0.0
	if (t_1 <= Inf)
		tmp = t_1;
	else
		tmp = Float64(fma(b, a, y) * z);
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := Block[{t$95$1 = N[(N[(N[(x + N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(t * a), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(a * z), $MachinePrecision] * b), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[t$95$1, Infinity], t$95$1, N[(N[(b * a + y), $MachinePrecision] * z), $MachinePrecision]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (+.f64 (+.f64 (+.f64 x (*.f64 y z)) (*.f64 t a)) (*.f64 (*.f64 a z) b)) < +inf.0

   1. Initial program 98.3%

      \[\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   if +inf.0 < (+.f64 (+.f64 (+.f64 x (*.f64 y z)) (*.f64 t a)) (*.f64 (*.f64 a z) b))

   1. Initial program 0.0%

      \[\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in z around inf

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(y + a \cdot b\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y + a \cdot b\right) \cdot z} \]

      2. lower-*.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y + a \cdot b\right) \cdot z} \]

      3. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(a \cdot b + y\right)} \cdot z \]

      4. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{b \cdot a} + y\right) \cdot z \]

      5. lower-fma.f64 85.7

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, y\right)} \cdot z \]

   5. Applied rewrites 85.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, y\right) \cdot z} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 2: 86.3% accurate, 1.2× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;t \leq -1.15 \cdot 10^{+58} \lor \neg \left(t \leq 1.75 \cdot 10^{+17}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(a, t, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, y, x\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, y\right), z, x\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= t -1.15e+58) (not (<= t 1.75e+17)))
   (fma a t (fma z y x))
   (fma (fma b a y) z x)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if ((t <= -1.15e+58) || !(t <= 1.75e+17)) {
		tmp = fma(a, t, fma(z, y, x));
	} else {
		tmp = fma(fma(b, a, y), z, x);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((t <= -1.15e+58) || !(t <= 1.75e+17))
		tmp = fma(a, t, fma(z, y, x));
	else
		tmp = fma(fma(b, a, y), z, x);
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := If[Or[LessEqual[t, -1.15e+58], N[Not[LessEqual[t, 1.75e+17]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(a * t + N[(z * y + x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[(b * a + y), $MachinePrecision] * z + x), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if t < -1.15000000000000001e58 or 1.75e17 < t

   1. Initial program 92.6%

      \[\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in t around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \left(a \cdot \left(b \cdot z\right) + y \cdot z\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(a \cdot \left(b \cdot z\right) + y \cdot z\right) + x} \]

      2. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z + a \cdot \left(b \cdot z\right)\right)} + x \]

      3. associate-*r* N/A

         \[\leadsto \left(y \cdot z + \color{blue}{\left(a \cdot b\right) \cdot z}\right) + x \]

      4. distribute-rgt-in N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(y + a \cdot b\right)} + x \]

      5. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y + a \cdot b\right) \cdot z} + x \]

      6. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y + a \cdot b, z, x\right)} \]

      7. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{a \cdot b + y}, z, x\right) \]

      8. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{b \cdot a} + y, z, x\right) \]

      9. lower-fma.f64 54.9

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, y\right)}, z, x\right) \]

   5. Applied rewrites 54.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, y\right), z, x\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in b around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \left(a \cdot t + y \cdot z\right)} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+r+ N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + a \cdot t\right) + y \cdot z} \]

      2. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(a \cdot t + x\right)} + y \cdot z \]

      3. associate-+l+ N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot t + \left(x + y \cdot z\right)} \]

      4. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(a, t, x + y \cdot z\right)} \]

      5. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(a, t, \color{blue}{y \cdot z + x}\right) \]

      6. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(a, t, \color{blue}{z \cdot y} + x\right) \]

      7. lower-fma.f64 93.6

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(a, t, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, y, x\right)}\right) \]

   8. Applied rewrites 93.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(a, t, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, y, x\right)\right)} \]

   if -1.15000000000000001e58 < t < 1.75e17

   1. Initial program 93.3%

      \[\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in t around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \left(a \cdot \left(b \cdot z\right) + y \cdot z\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(a \cdot \left(b \cdot z\right) + y \cdot z\right) + x} \]

      2. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z + a \cdot \left(b \cdot z\right)\right)} + x \]

      3. associate-*r* N/A

         \[\leadsto \left(y \cdot z + \color{blue}{\left(a \cdot b\right) \cdot z}\right) + x \]

      4. distribute-rgt-in N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(y + a \cdot b\right)} + x \]

      5. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y + a \cdot b\right) \cdot z} + x \]

      6. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y + a \cdot b, z, x\right)} \]

      7. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{a \cdot b + y}, z, x\right) \]

      8. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{b \cdot a} + y, z, x\right) \]

      9. lower-fma.f64 90.9

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, y\right)}, z, x\right) \]

   5. Applied rewrites 90.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, y\right), z, x\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 92.0%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;t \leq -1.15 \cdot 10^{+58} \lor \neg \left(t \leq 1.75 \cdot 10^{+17}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(a, t, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, y, x\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, y\right), z, x\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 3: 80.5% accurate, 1.2× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;b \leq -3.6 \cdot 10^{+241}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(z \cdot b, a, x\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;b \leq 1.5 \cdot 10^{+74}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(a, t, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, y, x\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(b \cdot a, z, x\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= b -3.6e+241)
   (fma (* z b) a x)
   (if (<= b 1.5e+74) (fma a t (fma z y x)) (fma (* b a) z x))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if (b <= -3.6e+241) {
		tmp = fma((z * b), a, x);
	} else if (b <= 1.5e+74) {
		tmp = fma(a, t, fma(z, y, x));
	} else {
		tmp = fma((b * a), z, x);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (b <= -3.6e+241)
		tmp = fma(Float64(z * b), a, x);
	elseif (b <= 1.5e+74)
		tmp = fma(a, t, fma(z, y, x));
	else
		tmp = fma(Float64(b * a), z, x);
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := If[LessEqual[b, -3.6e+241], N[(N[(z * b), $MachinePrecision] * a + x), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[b, 1.5e+74], N[(a * t + N[(z * y + x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[(b * a), $MachinePrecision] * z + x), $MachinePrecision]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if b < -3.59999999999999983e241

   1. Initial program 74.9%

      \[\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in y around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \left(a \cdot t + a \cdot \left(b \cdot z\right)\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. distribute-lft-in N/A

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(t + b \cdot z\right)} \]

      2. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(t + b \cdot z\right) + x} \]

      3. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(t + b \cdot z\right) \cdot a} + x \]

      4. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(t + b \cdot z, a, x\right)} \]

      5. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{b \cdot z + t}, a, x\right) \]

      6. lower-fma.f64 99.9

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, z, t\right)}, a, x\right) \]

   5. Applied rewrites 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(b, z, t\right), a, x\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in z around inf

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(b \cdot z, a, x\right) \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

   8. Applied rewrites 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z \cdot b, a, x\right) \]

   if -3.59999999999999983e241 < b < 1.5e74

   1. Initial program 94.7%

      \[\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in t around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \left(a \cdot \left(b \cdot z\right) + y \cdot z\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(a \cdot \left(b \cdot z\right) + y \cdot z\right) + x} \]

      2. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z + a \cdot \left(b \cdot z\right)\right)} + x \]

      3. associate-*r* N/A

         \[\leadsto \left(y \cdot z + \color{blue}{\left(a \cdot b\right) \cdot z}\right) + x \]

      4. distribute-rgt-in N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(y + a \cdot b\right)} + x \]

      5. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y + a \cdot b\right) \cdot z} + x \]

      6. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y + a \cdot b, z, x\right)} \]

      7. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{a \cdot b + y}, z, x\right) \]

      8. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{b \cdot a} + y, z, x\right) \]

      9. lower-fma.f64 72.3

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, y\right)}, z, x\right) \]

   5. Applied rewrites 72.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, y\right), z, x\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in b around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \left(a \cdot t + y \cdot z\right)} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+r+ N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + a \cdot t\right) + y \cdot z} \]

      2. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(a \cdot t + x\right)} + y \cdot z \]

      3. associate-+l+ N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot t + \left(x + y \cdot z\right)} \]

      4. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(a, t, x + y \cdot z\right)} \]

      5. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(a, t, \color{blue}{y \cdot z + x}\right) \]

      6. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(a, t, \color{blue}{z \cdot y} + x\right) \]

      7. lower-fma.f64 88.3

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(a, t, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, y, x\right)}\right) \]

   8. Applied rewrites 88.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(a, t, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, y, x\right)\right)} \]

   if 1.5e74 < b

   1. Initial program 91.3%

      \[\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in y around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \left(a \cdot t + a \cdot \left(b \cdot z\right)\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. distribute-lft-in N/A

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(t + b \cdot z\right)} \]

      2. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(t + b \cdot z\right) + x} \]

      3. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(t + b \cdot z\right) \cdot a} + x \]

      4. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(t + b \cdot z, a, x\right)} \]

      5. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{b \cdot z + t}, a, x\right) \]

      6. lower-fma.f64 82.4

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, z, t\right)}, a, x\right) \]

   5. Applied rewrites 82.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(b, z, t\right), a, x\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in t around 0

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(b \cdot z\right)} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

   8. Applied rewrites 72.3%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(b \cdot a, \color{blue}{z}, x\right) \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.
4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 4: 95.4% accurate, 1.2× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq 1.6 \cdot 10^{+181}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(a, \mathsf{fma}\left(b, z, t\right), \mathsf{fma}\left(z, y, x\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, y\right), z, x\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= z 1.6e+181) (fma a (fma b z t) (fma z y x)) (fma (fma b a y) z x)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if (z <= 1.6e+181) {
		tmp = fma(a, fma(b, z, t), fma(z, y, x));
	} else {
		tmp = fma(fma(b, a, y), z, x);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (z <= 1.6e+181)
		tmp = fma(a, fma(b, z, t), fma(z, y, x));
	else
		tmp = fma(fma(b, a, y), z, x);
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := If[LessEqual[z, 1.6e+181], N[(a * N[(b * z + t), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * y + x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[(b * a + y), $MachinePrecision] * z + x), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if z < 1.6e181

   1. Initial program 94.3%

      \[\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Add Preprocessing
   3. Step-by-step derivation

      1. lift-+.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b} \]

      2. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b + \left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right)} \]

      3. lift-+.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b + \color{blue}{\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right)} \]

      4. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b + \color{blue}{\left(t \cdot a + \left(x + y \cdot z\right)\right)} \]

      5. associate-+r+ N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b + t \cdot a\right) + \left(x + y \cdot z\right)} \]

      6. lift-*.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{\left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b} + t \cdot a\right) + \left(x + y \cdot z\right) \]

      7. lift-*.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{\left(a \cdot z\right)} \cdot b + t \cdot a\right) + \left(x + y \cdot z\right) \]

      8. associate-*l* N/A

         \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{a \cdot \left(z \cdot b\right)} + t \cdot a\right) + \left(x + y \cdot z\right) \]

      9. lift-*.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \left(a \cdot \left(z \cdot b\right) + \color{blue}{t \cdot a}\right) + \left(x + y \cdot z\right) \]

      10. *-commutative N/A

          \[\leadsto \left(a \cdot \left(z \cdot b\right) + \color{blue}{a \cdot t}\right) + \left(x + y \cdot z\right) \]

      11. distribute-lft-out N/A

          \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(z \cdot b + t\right)} + \left(x + y \cdot z\right) \]

      12. lower-fma.f64 N/A

          \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(a, z \cdot b + t, x + y \cdot z\right)} \]

      13. *-commutative N/A

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(a, \color{blue}{b \cdot z} + t, x + y \cdot z\right) \]

      14. lower-fma.f64 96.9

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(a, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, z, t\right)}, x + y \cdot z\right) \]

      15. lift-+.f64 N/A

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(a, \mathsf{fma}\left(b, z, t\right), \color{blue}{x + y \cdot z}\right) \]

      16. +-commutative N/A

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(a, \mathsf{fma}\left(b, z, t\right), \color{blue}{y \cdot z + x}\right) \]

      17. lift-*.f64 N/A

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(a, \mathsf{fma}\left(b, z, t\right), \color{blue}{y \cdot z} + x\right) \]

      18. *-commutative N/A

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(a, \mathsf{fma}\left(b, z, t\right), \color{blue}{z \cdot y} + x\right) \]

      19. lower-fma.f64 96.9

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(a, \mathsf{fma}\left(b, z, t\right), \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, y, x\right)}\right) \]

   4. Applied rewrites 96.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(a, \mathsf{fma}\left(b, z, t\right), \mathsf{fma}\left(z, y, x\right)\right)} \]

   if 1.6e181 < z

   1. Initial program 82.7%

      \[\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in t around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \left(a \cdot \left(b \cdot z\right) + y \cdot z\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(a \cdot \left(b \cdot z\right) + y \cdot z\right) + x} \]

      2. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z + a \cdot \left(b \cdot z\right)\right)} + x \]

      3. associate-*r* N/A

         \[\leadsto \left(y \cdot z + \color{blue}{\left(a \cdot b\right) \cdot z}\right) + x \]

      4. distribute-rgt-in N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(y + a \cdot b\right)} + x \]

      5. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y + a \cdot b\right) \cdot z} + x \]

      6. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y + a \cdot b, z, x\right)} \]

      7. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{a \cdot b + y}, z, x\right) \]

      8. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{b \cdot a} + y, z, x\right) \]

      9. lower-fma.f64 96.5

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, y\right)}, z, x\right) \]

   5. Applied rewrites 96.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, y\right), z, x\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 5: 74.7% accurate, 1.2× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -1.2 \cdot 10^{-22} \lor \neg \left(z \leq 3.2 \cdot 10^{-5}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, y\right) \cdot z\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(a, t, x\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= z -1.2e-22) (not (<= z 3.2e-5))) (* (fma b a y) z) (fma a t x)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z <= -1.2e-22) || !(z <= 3.2e-5)) {
		tmp = fma(b, a, y) * z;
	} else {
		tmp = fma(a, t, x);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((z <= -1.2e-22) || !(z <= 3.2e-5))
		tmp = Float64(fma(b, a, y) * z);
	else
		tmp = fma(a, t, x);
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := If[Or[LessEqual[z, -1.2e-22], N[Not[LessEqual[z, 3.2e-5]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(N[(b * a + y), $MachinePrecision] * z), $MachinePrecision], N[(a * t + x), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if z < -1.20000000000000001e-22 or 3.19999999999999986e-5 < z

   1. Initial program 86.6%

      \[\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in z around inf

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(y + a \cdot b\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y + a \cdot b\right) \cdot z} \]

      2. lower-*.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y + a \cdot b\right) \cdot z} \]

      3. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(a \cdot b + y\right)} \cdot z \]

      4. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{b \cdot a} + y\right) \cdot z \]

      5. lower-fma.f64 73.1

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, y\right)} \cdot z \]

   5. Applied rewrites 73.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, y\right) \cdot z} \]

   if -1.20000000000000001e-22 < z < 3.19999999999999986e-5

   1. Initial program 99.2%

      \[\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in t around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \left(a \cdot \left(b \cdot z\right) + y \cdot z\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(a \cdot \left(b \cdot z\right) + y \cdot z\right) + x} \]

      2. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z + a \cdot \left(b \cdot z\right)\right)} + x \]

      3. associate-*r* N/A

         \[\leadsto \left(y \cdot z + \color{blue}{\left(a \cdot b\right) \cdot z}\right) + x \]

      4. distribute-rgt-in N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(y + a \cdot b\right)} + x \]

      5. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y + a \cdot b\right) \cdot z} + x \]

      6. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y + a \cdot b, z, x\right)} \]

      7. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{a \cdot b + y}, z, x\right) \]

      8. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{b \cdot a} + y, z, x\right) \]

      9. lower-fma.f64 65.3

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, y\right)}, z, x\right) \]

   5. Applied rewrites 65.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, y\right), z, x\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in z around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + a \cdot t} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot t + x} \]

      2. lower-fma.f64 72.0

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(a, t, x\right)} \]

   8. Applied rewrites 72.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(a, t, x\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 72.5%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -1.2 \cdot 10^{-22} \lor \neg \left(z \leq 3.2 \cdot 10^{-5}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, y\right) \cdot z\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(a, t, x\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 6: 62.5% accurate, 1.2× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;t \leq -850000000000 \lor \neg \left(t \leq 1.75 \cdot 10^{+17}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(a, t, x\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(b \cdot a, z, x\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= t -850000000000.0) (not (<= t 1.75e+17)))
   (fma a t x)
   (fma (* b a) z x)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if ((t <= -850000000000.0) || !(t <= 1.75e+17)) {
		tmp = fma(a, t, x);
	} else {
		tmp = fma((b * a), z, x);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((t <= -850000000000.0) || !(t <= 1.75e+17))
		tmp = fma(a, t, x);
	else
		tmp = fma(Float64(b * a), z, x);
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := If[Or[LessEqual[t, -850000000000.0], N[Not[LessEqual[t, 1.75e+17]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(a * t + x), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[(b * a), $MachinePrecision] * z + x), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if t < -8.5e11 or 1.75e17 < t

   1. Initial program 92.1%

      \[\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in t around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \left(a \cdot \left(b \cdot z\right) + y \cdot z\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(a \cdot \left(b \cdot z\right) + y \cdot z\right) + x} \]

      2. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z + a \cdot \left(b \cdot z\right)\right)} + x \]

      3. associate-*r* N/A

         \[\leadsto \left(y \cdot z + \color{blue}{\left(a \cdot b\right) \cdot z}\right) + x \]

      4. distribute-rgt-in N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(y + a \cdot b\right)} + x \]

      5. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y + a \cdot b\right) \cdot z} + x \]

      6. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y + a \cdot b, z, x\right)} \]

      7. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{a \cdot b + y}, z, x\right) \]

      8. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{b \cdot a} + y, z, x\right) \]

      9. lower-fma.f64 57.3

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, y\right)}, z, x\right) \]

   5. Applied rewrites 57.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, y\right), z, x\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in z around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + a \cdot t} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot t + x} \]

      2. lower-fma.f64 72.4

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(a, t, x\right)} \]

   8. Applied rewrites 72.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(a, t, x\right)} \]

   if -8.5e11 < t < 1.75e17

   1. Initial program 93.7%

      \[\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in y around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \left(a \cdot t + a \cdot \left(b \cdot z\right)\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. distribute-lft-in N/A

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(t + b \cdot z\right)} \]

      2. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(t + b \cdot z\right) + x} \]

      3. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(t + b \cdot z\right) \cdot a} + x \]

      4. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(t + b \cdot z, a, x\right)} \]

      5. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{b \cdot z + t}, a, x\right) \]

      6. lower-fma.f64 72.2

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, z, t\right)}, a, x\right) \]

   5. Applied rewrites 72.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(b, z, t\right), a, x\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in t around 0

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(b \cdot z\right)} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

   8. Applied rewrites 64.8%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(b \cdot a, \color{blue}{z}, x\right) \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 68.2%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;t \leq -850000000000 \lor \neg \left(t \leq 1.75 \cdot 10^{+17}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(a, t, x\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(b \cdot a, z, x\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 7: 58.0% accurate, 1.3× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -6.6 \cdot 10^{+22} \lor \neg \left(z \leq 8.6 \cdot 10^{+220}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;\left(b \cdot a\right) \cdot z\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(a, t, x\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= z -6.6e+22) (not (<= z 8.6e+220))) (* (* b a) z) (fma a t x)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z <= -6.6e+22) || !(z <= 8.6e+220)) {
		tmp = (b * a) * z;
	} else {
		tmp = fma(a, t, x);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((z <= -6.6e+22) || !(z <= 8.6e+220))
		tmp = Float64(Float64(b * a) * z);
	else
		tmp = fma(a, t, x);
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := If[Or[LessEqual[z, -6.6e+22], N[Not[LessEqual[z, 8.6e+220]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(N[(b * a), $MachinePrecision] * z), $MachinePrecision], N[(a * t + x), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if z < -6.5999999999999996e22 or 8.5999999999999999e220 < z

   1. Initial program 82.5%

      \[\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in z around inf

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(y + a \cdot b\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y + a \cdot b\right) \cdot z} \]

      2. lower-*.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y + a \cdot b\right) \cdot z} \]

      3. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(a \cdot b + y\right)} \cdot z \]

      4. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{b \cdot a} + y\right) \cdot z \]

      5. lower-fma.f64 83.2

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, y\right)} \cdot z \]

   5. Applied rewrites 83.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, y\right) \cdot z} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in y around 0

      \[\leadsto \left(a \cdot b\right) \cdot z \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

   8. Applied rewrites 47.9%

      \[\leadsto \left(b \cdot a\right) \cdot z \]

   if -6.5999999999999996e22 < z < 8.5999999999999999e220

   1. Initial program 97.2%

      \[\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in t around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \left(a \cdot \left(b \cdot z\right) + y \cdot z\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(a \cdot \left(b \cdot z\right) + y \cdot z\right) + x} \]

      2. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z + a \cdot \left(b \cdot z\right)\right)} + x \]

      3. associate-*r* N/A

         \[\leadsto \left(y \cdot z + \color{blue}{\left(a \cdot b\right) \cdot z}\right) + x \]

      4. distribute-rgt-in N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(y + a \cdot b\right)} + x \]

      5. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y + a \cdot b\right) \cdot z} + x \]

      6. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y + a \cdot b, z, x\right)} \]

      7. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{a \cdot b + y}, z, x\right) \]

      8. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{b \cdot a} + y, z, x\right) \]

      9. lower-fma.f64 70.6

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, y\right)}, z, x\right) \]

   5. Applied rewrites 70.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, y\right), z, x\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in z around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + a \cdot t} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot t + x} \]

      2. lower-fma.f64 64.5

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(a, t, x\right)} \]

   8. Applied rewrites 64.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(a, t, x\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 59.7%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -6.6 \cdot 10^{+22} \lor \neg \left(z \leq 8.6 \cdot 10^{+220}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;\left(b \cdot a\right) \cdot z\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(a, t, x\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 8: 52.4% accurate, 4.3× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \mathsf{fma}\left(a, t, x\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b) :precision binary64 (fma a t x))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	return fma(a, t, x);
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	return fma(a, t, x)
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := N[(a * t + x), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 93.0%

   \[\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \]
2. Add Preprocessing

3. Taylor expanded in t around 0

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \left(a \cdot \left(b \cdot z\right) + y \cdot z\right)} \]
4. Step-by-step derivation

   1. +-commutative N/A

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(a \cdot \left(b \cdot z\right) + y \cdot z\right) + x} \]

   2. +-commutative N/A

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z + a \cdot \left(b \cdot z\right)\right)} + x \]

   3. associate-*r* N/A

      \[\leadsto \left(y \cdot z + \color{blue}{\left(a \cdot b\right) \cdot z}\right) + x \]

   4. distribute-rgt-in N/A

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(y + a \cdot b\right)} + x \]

   5. *-commutative N/A

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y + a \cdot b\right) \cdot z} + x \]

   6. lower-fma.f64 N/A

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y + a \cdot b, z, x\right)} \]

   7. +-commutative N/A

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{a \cdot b + y}, z, x\right) \]

   8. *-commutative N/A

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{b \cdot a} + y, z, x\right) \]

   9. lower-fma.f64 75.7

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, y\right)}, z, x\right) \]

5. Applied rewrites 75.7%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, y\right), z, x\right)} \]

6. Taylor expanded in z around 0

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + a \cdot t} \]
7. Step-by-step derivation

   1. +-commutative N/A

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot t + x} \]

   2. lower-fma.f64 52.4

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(a, t, x\right)} \]

8. Applied rewrites 52.4%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(a, t, x\right)} \]
9. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 9: 28.1% accurate, 5.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ a \cdot t \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b) :precision binary64 (* a t))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	return a * t;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    code = a * t
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	return a * t;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b):
	return a * t

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	return Float64(a * t)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = a * t;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := N[(a * t), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 93.0%

   \[\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \]
2. Add Preprocessing

3. Taylor expanded in t around inf

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot t} \]
4. Step-by-step derivation

   1. lower-*.f64 27.3

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot t} \]

5. Applied rewrites 27.3%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot t} \]
6. Add Preprocessing

Developer Target 1: 97.1% accurate, 0.8× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_1 := z \cdot \left(b \cdot a + y\right) + \left(x + t \cdot a\right)\\ \mathbf{if}\;z < -11820553527347888000:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_1\\ \mathbf{elif}\;z < 4.7589743188364287 \cdot 10^{-122}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(b \cdot z + t\right) \cdot a + \left(z \cdot y + x\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_1\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_1 (+ (* z (+ (* b a) y)) (+ x (* t a)))))
   (if (< z -11820553527347888000.0)
     t_1
     (if (< z 4.7589743188364287e-122)
       (+ (* (+ (* b z) t) a) (+ (* z y) x))
       t_1))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double t_1 = (z * ((b * a) + y)) + (x + (t * a));
	double tmp;
	if (z < -11820553527347888000.0) {
		tmp = t_1;
	} else if (z < 4.7589743188364287e-122) {
		tmp = (((b * z) + t) * a) + ((z * y) + x);
	} else {
		tmp = t_1;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8) :: t_1
    real(8) :: tmp
    t_1 = (z * ((b * a) + y)) + (x + (t * a))
    if (z < (-11820553527347888000.0d0)) then
        tmp = t_1
    else if (z < 4.7589743188364287d-122) then
        tmp = (((b * z) + t) * a) + ((z * y) + x)
    else
        tmp = t_1
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double t_1 = (z * ((b * a) + y)) + (x + (t * a));
	double tmp;
	if (z < -11820553527347888000.0) {
		tmp = t_1;
	} else if (z < 4.7589743188364287e-122) {
		tmp = (((b * z) + t) * a) + ((z * y) + x);
	} else {
		tmp = t_1;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b):
	t_1 = (z * ((b * a) + y)) + (x + (t * a))
	tmp = 0
	if z < -11820553527347888000.0:
		tmp = t_1
	elif z < 4.7589743188364287e-122:
		tmp = (((b * z) + t) * a) + ((z * y) + x)
	else:
		tmp = t_1
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	t_1 = Float64(Float64(z * Float64(Float64(b * a) + y)) + Float64(x + Float64(t * a)))
	tmp = 0.0
	if (z < -11820553527347888000.0)
		tmp = t_1;
	elseif (z < 4.7589743188364287e-122)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(b * z) + t) * a) + Float64(Float64(z * y) + x));
	else
		tmp = t_1;
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	t_1 = (z * ((b * a) + y)) + (x + (t * a));
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (z < -11820553527347888000.0)
		tmp = t_1;
	elseif (z < 4.7589743188364287e-122)
		tmp = (((b * z) + t) * a) + ((z * y) + x);
	else
		tmp = t_1;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := Block[{t$95$1 = N[(N[(z * N[(N[(b * a), $MachinePrecision] + y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(x + N[(t * a), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, If[Less[z, -11820553527347888000.0], t$95$1, If[Less[z, 4.7589743188364287e-122], N[(N[(N[(N[(b * z), $MachinePrecision] + t), $MachinePrecision] * a), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(z * y), $MachinePrecision] + x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], t$95$1]]]

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2024320 
(FPCore (x y z t a b)
  :name "Graphics.Rasterific.CubicBezier:cachedBezierAt from Rasterific-0.6.1"
  :precision binary64

  :alt
  (! :herbie-platform default (if (< z -11820553527347888000) (+ (* z (+ (* b a) y)) (+ x (* t a))) (if (< z 47589743188364287/1000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000) (+ (* (+ (* b z) t) a) (+ (* z y) x)) (+ (* z (+ (* b a) y)) (+ x (* t a))))))

  (+ (+ (+ x (* y z)) (* t a)) (* (* a z) b)))